Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #243146 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-05-12 12:36 -0400 |
| Last post | 2014-05-13 09:08 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 211 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 12:36 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 12:18 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 13:07 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 14:53 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 14:26 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 13:31 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2014-05-12 21:25 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 14:47 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 20:23 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 15:12 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 14:38 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 15:13 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:08 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:19 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:51 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-13 15:23 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-13 15:48 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 13:57 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:20 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 15:22 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 09:40 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:19 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-14 00:49 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 19:09 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 15:14 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-14 20:55 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-15 06:47 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 16:58 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-14 06:48 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 10:27 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 10:53 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 17:25 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 12:28 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 09:42 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 22:39 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 19:41 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 08:46 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:04 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:41 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 12:22 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 09:37 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 18:38 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 09:52 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 12:54 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:59 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:24 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 12:32 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 15:15 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 15:13 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:21 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:26 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:31 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:35 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:41 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:50 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:36 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 19:09 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 12:59 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 16:47 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-14 20:51 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:30 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:05 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-13 15:21 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 14:45 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-13 17:38 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 14:48 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 14:24 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 15:48 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:19 -0600
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 16:53 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 17:14 -0600
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:19 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-13 15:18 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:16 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 15:12 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:24 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:28 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:37 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:44 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:48 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:51 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 16:51 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 00:29 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 19:16 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:13 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 19:32 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:49 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 20:10 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 20:21 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 20:34 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:49 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 22:58 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 23:15 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 23:19 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 20:29 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 08:19 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 08:56 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:18 -0700
Real Life girl$$$ aren't that hot. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 03:21 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 08:49 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 08:17 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:30 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:32 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:21 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-13 07:02 -0500
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 10:17 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:06 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:10 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:41 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:19 -0600
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:13 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 18:40 -0600
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-12 21:22 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2014-05-12 20:50 -0600
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 10:08 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:13 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-13 11:18 -0600
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 13:52 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-13 12:55 -0600
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 17:47 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-13 20:09 -0600
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 22:22 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 19:39 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 07:38 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 10:24 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 08:30 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 19:43 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 11:21 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 10:16 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 15:37 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 16:56 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 16:01 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-13 11:16 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:18 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 16:38 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-13 12:27 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 09:42 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 18:35 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 10:39 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 09:41 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 09:45 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 08:33 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-14 15:58 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 08:25 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:12 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:29 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-14 17:35 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 18:40 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:48 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 09:50 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:42 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-14 17:57 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 10:07 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-14 18:36 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 10:51 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-14 18:55 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 11:51 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 14:41 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2014-05-14 20:48 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 14:50 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 14:51 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 12:04 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 12:07 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 14:30 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 11:55 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 10:09 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 09:49 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:54 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 17:23 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 08:39 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 08:33 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-13 12:26 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 18:51 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 18:33 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 09:21 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 09:38 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 17:21 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-14 15:54 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 12:14 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 18:36 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-14 17:46 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 09:54 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 10:03 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 19:34 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 10:44 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:27 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 16:56 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 08:14 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 10:18 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 11:31 +0200
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 10:59 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 16:02 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 11:11 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:17 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:39 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 16:37 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 11:45 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 16:58 +0100
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:50 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 09:08 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-13 11:06 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 11:11 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:13 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-13 11:30 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-13 11:34 -0400
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:38 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:48 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-13 11:21 -0600
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 10:28 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 10:43 -0700
Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 09:08 -0700
Page 3 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 11 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 09:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF98E9CA.3743D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243632 |
On 5/14/14, 9:22 AM, in article ll058g$g14$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: > On 14-05-14 10:53 AM, DFS wrote: > >>> As it is, both Apple and Google are a lot more influential in the >>> tech world than they are. Other than Windows or Office, Microsoft has >>> absolutely nothing anymore. >> >> What a stupid statement. Entirely worthy of Hypocrite Homer or JED or >> some of the other ignorant dumbasses that haunt cola. >> >> >> http://www.microsoft.com/investor/EarningsAndFinancials/Financials/fy10/Q4/Se >> gmentRevenues.aspx > > Their earnings don't make them influential. It simply determines whether > the company is healthy or not. As it is, they're healthy. However, do > you believe other companies are looking at what Microsoft is doing and > imitating them? No? Therefore, they're not influential. > > The statement isn't stupid, it's your interpretation of it that is. If they are not influential then why do so many open source project seek to copy them? Why are Open Office and LibreOffice made to be clones of MS Office (minus the Ribbon, though I believe there are extensions to do that, too). Why do so many Linux DE's use the same basic look at MS's task bar, notification area, and Start Button, merely adding their own twist to it? Where do you think Apple got the idea for contextual menus and drag indicators. Sure, MS does a lot of copying and they are not leaders in design and innovation in the same way Apple is... but they have been very influential in the industry. >>> Their phone OS is insignificant, their >>> search engine is more or less insignificant, their browser is >>> insignificant and the market share for all of them is either small is >>> dropping. >> >> IE market share of 21%, which is a little higher than Firefox's - is >> "insignificant"? >> >> You're really sounding like a cola idiot. Why? > > The market share of IE is diminishing and anyone who tries Chrome, > Firefox or Opera even for five minutes is able to determine that they're > a lot better than IE even if they know little or nothing about them. While I agree IE is not the best, the idea anyone can tell this is just silly. > Thus, it's likely that IE's market share will decrease even more, > especially in light of the recent showstopping bugs. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 18:38 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87vbt8jox1.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #243632 |
Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> writes: > On 14-05-14 10:53 AM, DFS wrote: > >>> As it is, both Apple and Google are a lot more influential in the >>> tech world than they are. Other than Windows or Office, Microsoft has >>> absolutely nothing anymore. >> >> What a stupid statement. Entirely worthy of Hypocrite Homer or JED or >> some of the other ignorant dumbasses that haunt cola. >> >> >> http://www.microsoft.com/investor/EarningsAndFinancials/Financials/fy10/Q4/SegmentRevenues.aspx > > Their earnings don't make them influential. It simply determines whether > the company is healthy or not. As it is, they're healthy. However, do > you believe other companies are looking at what Microsoft is doing and > imitating them? No? Therefore, they're not influential. Wow. You really are an idiot. You think people dont take note of the company that provides the office SW for over 90% of the world's business desktops? You're deluded or stupid. A combination of the two most likely. > > The statement isn't stupid, it's your interpretation of it that is. No. Your statement is. > >>> Their phone OS is insignificant, their >>> search engine is more or less insignificant, their browser is >>> insignificant and the market share for all of them is either small is >>> dropping. >> >> IE market share of 21%, which is a little higher than Firefox's - is >> "insignificant"? >> >> You're really sounding like a cola idiot. Why? > > The market share of IE is diminishing and anyone who tries Chrome, > Firefox or Opera even for five minutes is able to determine that they're > a lot better than IE even if they know little or nothing about them. Says who? IE was crap but has come on a lot. > Thus, it's likely that IE's market share will decrease even more, > especially in light of the recent showstopping bugs. Aha. Another COLA visionary. LOL. You sure like the sound of your own whiny little voice. -- "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 09:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF98ED68.3744C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243642 |
On 5/14/14, 9:38 AM, in article 87vbt8jox1.fsf@gmail.com, "Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote: > Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> writes: > >> On 14-05-14 10:53 AM, DFS wrote: >> >>>> As it is, both Apple and Google are a lot more influential in the >>>> tech world than they are. Other than Windows or Office, Microsoft has >>>> absolutely nothing anymore. >>> >>> What a stupid statement. Entirely worthy of Hypocrite Homer or JED or >>> some of the other ignorant dumbasses that haunt cola. >>> >>> >>> http://www.microsoft.com/investor/EarningsAndFinancials/Financials/fy10/Q4/S >>> egmentRevenues.aspx >> >> Their earnings don't make them influential. It simply determines whether >> the company is healthy or not. As it is, they're healthy. However, do >> you believe other companies are looking at what Microsoft is doing and >> imitating them? No? Therefore, they're not influential. > > Wow. You really are an idiot. > > You think people dont take note of the company that provides the office > SW for over 90% of the world's business desktops? > > You're deluded or stupid. A combination of the two most likely. He is back in his worship of open source phase. Give him a month and watch it not work well for him... then he will leave it and bad mouth open source again. All the while he will bad-mouth Apple more than he used to because he thinks that is somehow an attack against me. He is all about emotion... he shuns reasoning. >> The statement isn't stupid, it's your interpretation of it that is. > > No. Your statement is. > >> >>>> Their phone OS is insignificant, their >>>> search engine is more or less insignificant, their browser is >>>> insignificant and the market share for all of them is either small is >>>> dropping. >>> >>> IE market share of 21%, which is a little higher than Firefox's - is >>> "insignificant"? >>> >>> You're really sounding like a cola idiot. Why? >> >> The market share of IE is diminishing and anyone who tries Chrome, >> Firefox or Opera even for five minutes is able to determine that they're >> a lot better than IE even if they know little or nothing about them. > > Says who? > > IE was crap but has come on a lot. Yes, it has. Still not my preferred browser but lots of people use it and like it - even those who have seen the competition. >> Thus, it's likely that IE's market share will decrease even more, >> especially in light of the recent showstopping bugs. > > Aha. Another COLA visionary. > > LOL. You sure like the sound of your own whiny little voice. > -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 12:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll073c$u5j$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243642 |
On 14-05-14 12:38 PM, Hadron wrote: >>>> As it is, both Apple and Google are a lot more influential in the >>>> tech world than they are. Other than Windows or Office, Microsoft has >>>> absolutely nothing anymore. >>> >>> What a stupid statement. Entirely worthy of Hypocrite Homer or JED or >>> some of the other ignorant dumbasses that haunt cola. >>> >>> >>> http://www.microsoft.com/investor/EarningsAndFinancials/Financials/fy10/Q4/SegmentRevenues.aspx >> >> Their earnings don't make them influential. It simply determines whether >> the company is healthy or not. As it is, they're healthy. However, do >> you believe other companies are looking at what Microsoft is doing and >> imitating them? No? Therefore, they're not influential. > > Wow. You really are an idiot. > > You think people dont take note of the company that provides the office > SW for over 90% of the world's business desktops? > > You're deluded or stupid. A combination of the two most likely. By that token, I suppose that the rest of the technological companies will be imitating Windows 8 and pushing very hard for every one of their devices to sport a touchscreen. Oh wait, NOBODY is imitating Windows 8 and neither Apple nor Google care about touchscreens? But I thought Microsoft was influential! You obviously don't seem to understand the word "influential." Go back to licking the crust from Snit's asshole. >> The statement isn't stupid, it's your interpretation of it that is. > > No. Your statement is. Actually, I was wrong. You're the stupid one. >> The market share of IE is diminishing and anyone who tries Chrome, >> Firefox or Opera even for five minutes is able to determine that they're >> a lot better than IE even if they know little or nothing about them. > > Says who? > > IE was crap but has come on a lot. It has improved but it still provides the absolute worst experience of the three. It doesn't respect HTML standards, it lets through the greatest number of ads and does little to stop tracking of any kind. The only areas where IE performs well is in hardware acceleration (who cares, seriously?) and start-up time (due to the fact that parts of it load with Windows). In every other area, IE fails miserably. Since reading isn't your strength, I am bundling a video for you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6oEDWoaPi4 . >> Thus, it's likely that IE's market share will decrease even more, >> especially in light of the recent showstopping bugs. > > Aha. Another COLA visionary. > > LOL. You sure like the sound of your own whiny little voice. By all means, you should look up photos of me and determine whether I the adjectives "little" or "whiny" apply. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 19:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll1013$lmb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243632 |
On 5/14/2014 12:22 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 14-05-14 10:53 AM, DFS wrote: > >>> As it is, both Apple and Google are a lot more influential in the >>> tech world than they are. Other than Windows or Office, Microsoft has >>> absolutely nothing anymore. >> >> What a stupid statement. Entirely worthy of Hypocrite Homer or JED or >> some of the other ignorant dumbasses that haunt cola. >> >> >> http://www.microsoft.com/investor/EarningsAndFinancials/Financials/fy10/Q4/SegmentRevenues.aspx > > Their earnings don't make them influential. It simply determines whether > the company is healthy or not. As it is, they're healthy. However, do > you believe other companies are looking at what Microsoft is doing and > imitating them? No? Therefore, they're not influential. > > The statement isn't stupid, it's your interpretation of it that is. Your claim is extremely ignorant, though I should've asked you to clarify what you meant by 'influential'. They're not doing too well - not driving the industry - in smartphones or tablets, so if that's what you mean by 'influential' you're correct. But many MS products are influential in the IT world: Windows Server, Exchange Server, SQL Server, SharePoint, Visual Studio. In the general world/media: Windows/Office (as you said), XBox, Kinect, some games, Skype They make/made a LOT of products: http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifeselectindex >>> Their phone OS is insignificant, their >>> search engine is more or less insignificant, their browser is >>> insignificant and the market share for all of them is either small is >>> dropping. >> >> IE market share of 21%, which is a little higher than Firefox's - is >> "insignificant"? >> >> You're really sounding like a cola idiot. Why? > > The market share of IE is diminishing and anyone who tries Chrome, > Firefox or Opera even for five minutes is able to determine that they're > a lot better than IE even if they know little or nothing about them. I think IE is a good browser. So are Chrome, Firefox and Opera. (I use Opera on Windows, and Chrome on Linux) > Thus, it's likely that IE's market share will decrease even more, > especially in light of the recent showstopping bugs.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 09:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a1ebf26c-517e-47b1-b972-605a09095792@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #243611 |
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 8:53:44 AM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > On 5/14/2014 10:27 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: > > > On 14-05-14 07:48 AM, chrisv wrote: > > >>> troll wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Once again, you've demonstrated an incredible lack of knowledge. > > >> > > >> Once again, you've demonstrated how incredibly dishonest you are. > > >> > > >> To the average consumer, they are "brand X". > > >> > > >> They have a very limited selection, and they can't offer the same > > >> values as the larger OEM's. > > >> > > >> It is not required that one company have 100 fscking percent of a > > >> market, for an unhealthy competitive environment to exist. > > >> > > >> Duh and double duh. > > >> > > >> Sufficient market power for unfair (and effective) anti-competitive > > >> behavior can be obtained without having 100 fscking percent of the > > >> market. > > >> > > >> Duh and double huh. > > > > > > Microsoft does NOT have the market power you keep believing them to > > > have. > > > > I agree. But the whining ninnies here on cola insist on being victims > > of Microsoft. Damn near everyone has been a victim of MS' business tactics to some extent and no amount of hand wringing or spinning can change that fact. Trying to pretend the past hasn't played a large part of the current landscape is bullshit and you know it, which is why statements like this exist: "Microsoft's predatory campaign has caused significant anticompetitive effects, has injured consumers, and threatens to cause even greater harm in the future." http://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/f2600/2613toc_htm.htm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 12:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll05qn$kgs$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243633 |
On 14-05-14 12:24 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 8:53:44 AM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >> On 5/14/2014 10:27 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >> >>> On 14-05-14 07:48 AM, chrisv wrote: >> >>>>> troll wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Once again, you've demonstrated an incredible lack of knowledge. >> >>>> >> >>>> Once again, you've demonstrated how incredibly dishonest you are. >> >>>> >> >>>> To the average consumer, they are "brand X". >> >>>> >> >>>> They have a very limited selection, and they can't offer the same >> >>>> values as the larger OEM's. >> >>>> >> >>>> It is not required that one company have 100 fscking percent of a >> >>>> market, for an unhealthy competitive environment to exist. >> >>>> >> >>>> Duh and double duh. >> >>>> >> >>>> Sufficient market power for unfair (and effective) anti-competitive >> >>>> behavior can be obtained without having 100 fscking percent of the >> >>>> market. >> >>>> >> >>>> Duh and double huh. >> >>> >> >>> Microsoft does NOT have the market power you keep believing them to >> >>> have. >> >> >> >> I agree. But the whining ninnies here on cola insist on being victims >> >> of Microsoft. > > Damn near everyone has been a victim of MS' business tactics to some extent and no amount of hand wringing or spinning can change that fact. Trying to pretend the past hasn't played a large part of the current landscape is bullshit and you know it, which is why statements like this exist: > > "Microsoft's predatory campaign has caused significant anticompetitive effects, has injured consumers, and threatens to cause even greater harm in the future." > > http://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/f2600/2613toc_htm.htm To concentrate all of our time on Microsoft's anti-competitive practises would be to only paint half of a picture. They've also shown a complete disregard for the privacy of their users. Skype is continuously monitored by the NSA and the company regularly spies on Hotmail users ( http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/21/hotmail-spying_n_5003855.html ). Why, exactly, should we continue to give them our hard-earned money knowing that respecting us is not one of their priorities? -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 15:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <slrnln7jno.40d.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #243595 |
On 2014-05-14, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> troll wrote:
>>>
>>> Once again, you've demonstrated an incredible lack of knowledge.
>
> Once again, you've demonstrated how incredibly dishonest you are.
>
> To the average consumer, they are "brand X".
>
> They have a very limited selection, and they can't offer the same
> values as the larger OEM's.
No. They're just Brand X.
The rest doesn't matter.
[deletia]
--
Apple: Because the individual is not statistically meaningful. |||
/ | \
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 15:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <slrnln7jik.40d.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #243520 |
On 2014-05-13, Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote:
> On 14-05-13 04:23 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>> On 2014-05-13, Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> wrote:
>>> On 14-05-12 04:13 PM, chrisv wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> People are free to use GNU/Linux or buy a Mac.
>>>>
>>>> The fact that it's possible to find an alternative does not mean there
>>>> is no monopoly.
>>>>
>>>> There is nothing resembling a level playing field in the market. The
>>>> fact that one must often pay a premium just to avoid the
>>>> market-leader's product is proof-enough of that.
>>>>
>>>> Idiot.
>>>
>>> Name-calling. The true mark of a "man."
>>>
>>> Who is forcing you to pay a premium exactly? Is it impossible for you to
>>> buy a System76 computer which doesn't come with Windows? As far as I
>>
>> Some vendor that no one ever heard of and is not present at your
>> local mall certainly has no relevance in a discussion about monopoly law.
>
> System76 is one of the top five largest suppliers of GNU/Linux machines.
> Once again, you've demonstrated an incredible lack of knowledge.
That doesn't really contradict anything I said.
--
Apple: Because the individual is not statistically meaningful. |||
/ | \
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 17:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll0mp0$m8v$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243684 |
On 14-05-14 04:13 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>> Who is forcing you to pay a premium exactly? Is it impossible for you to >>>> buy a System76 computer which doesn't come with Windows? As far as I >>> >>> Some vendor that no one ever heard of and is not present at your >>> local mall certainly has no relevance in a discussion about monopoly law. >> >> System76 is one of the top five largest suppliers of GNU/Linux machines. >> Once again, you've demonstrated an incredible lack of knowledge. > > That doesn't really contradict anything I said. You insinuated that System76 is "some vendor no one ever heard of." -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 17:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1am58nscunf0e.vibdvsd2xj9h.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #243692 |
On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:21:36 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 14-05-14 04:13 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: > >>>>> Who is forcing you to pay a premium exactly? Is it impossible for you to >>>>> buy a System76 computer which doesn't come with Windows? As far as I >>>> >>>> Some vendor that no one ever heard of and is not present at your >>>> local mall certainly has no relevance in a discussion about monopoly law. >>> >>> System76 is one of the top five largest suppliers of GNU/Linux machines. >>> Once again, you've demonstrated an incredible lack of knowledge. >> >> That doesn't really contradict anything I said. > > You insinuated that System76 is "some vendor no one ever heard of." Jeb is clueless as usual. It's on the first page of Google hits for "pre-loaded Linux computers"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 17:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll0nc9$m8v$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243695 |
On 14-05-14 05:26 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: > On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:21:36 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > >> On 14-05-14 04:13 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >> >>>>>> Who is forcing you to pay a premium exactly? Is it impossible for you to >>>>>> buy a System76 computer which doesn't come with Windows? As far as I >>>>> >>>>> Some vendor that no one ever heard of and is not present at your >>>>> local mall certainly has no relevance in a discussion about monopoly law. >>>> >>>> System76 is one of the top five largest suppliers of GNU/Linux machines. >>>> Once again, you've demonstrated an incredible lack of knowledge. >>> >>> That doesn't really contradict anything I said. >> >> You insinuated that System76 is "some vendor no one ever heard of." > > Jeb is clueless as usual. > > It's on the first page of Google hits for "pre-loaded Linux > computers" It's also the main sponsor of the Linux Action Show. In fact, they send the guys machines to play with while they record their show. To me, that speaks volumes about the profitability of the enterprise. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 17:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <bdeyb306qrc2$.q101zw1qj7md.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #243701 |
On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:31:54 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 14-05-14 05:26 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: >> On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:21:36 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >> >>> On 14-05-14 04:13 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>> >>>>>>> Who is forcing you to pay a premium exactly? Is it impossible for you to >>>>>>> buy a System76 computer which doesn't come with Windows? As far as I >>>>>> >>>>>> Some vendor that no one ever heard of and is not present at your >>>>>> local mall certainly has no relevance in a discussion about monopoly law. >>>>> >>>>> System76 is one of the top five largest suppliers of GNU/Linux machines. >>>>> Once again, you've demonstrated an incredible lack of knowledge. >>>> >>>> That doesn't really contradict anything I said. >>> >>> You insinuated that System76 is "some vendor no one ever heard of." >> >> Jeb is clueless as usual. >> >> It's on the first page of Google hits for "pre-loaded Linux >> computers" > > It's also the main sponsor of the Linux Action Show. In fact, they send > the guys machines to play with while they record their show. To me, that > speaks volumes about the profitability of the enterprise. They are a good company and if more of the hypocrite Linux "advocates" supported them, they might even become a great company and make lot's of money while promoting Linux. But the Linux "advocates" are the biggest hypocrites on the planet and since they also tend to be cheap they will support Microsoft loaded machines instead of paying a little more for a Linux vendor's machine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 17:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll0nth$1gi$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243706 |
On 14-05-14 05:35 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: > On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:31:54 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > >> On 14-05-14 05:26 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>> On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:21:36 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >>> >>>> On 14-05-14 04:13 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>> Who is forcing you to pay a premium exactly? Is it impossible for you to >>>>>>>> buy a System76 computer which doesn't come with Windows? As far as I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Some vendor that no one ever heard of and is not present at your >>>>>>> local mall certainly has no relevance in a discussion about monopoly law. >>>>>> >>>>>> System76 is one of the top five largest suppliers of GNU/Linux machines. >>>>>> Once again, you've demonstrated an incredible lack of knowledge. >>>>> >>>>> That doesn't really contradict anything I said. >>>> >>>> You insinuated that System76 is "some vendor no one ever heard of." >>> >>> Jeb is clueless as usual. >>> >>> It's on the first page of Google hits for "pre-loaded Linux >>> computers" >> >> It's also the main sponsor of the Linux Action Show. In fact, they send >> the guys machines to play with while they record their show. To me, that >> speaks volumes about the profitability of the enterprise. > > They are a good company and if more of the hypocrite Linux > "advocates" supported them, they might even become a great company > and make lot's of money while promoting Linux. > > But the Linux "advocates" are the biggest hypocrites on the planet > and since they also tend to be cheap they will support Microsoft > loaded machines instead of paying a little more for a Linux vendor's > machine. The hypocrisy here truly is alarming. When I first came here, I expected the advocates to be equipped with ThinkPenguin computers (overpriced computers using dated technology which just happens to have free drivers). I'm surprised that they're instead feeding the Microsoft machine by being cheapskates. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 17:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ym0ftp4qhqac$.2cogypznfxjv$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #243710 |
On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:41:05 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 14-05-14 05:35 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: >> On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:31:54 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >> >>> On 14-05-14 05:26 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>>> On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:21:36 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 14-05-14 04:13 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>> Who is forcing you to pay a premium exactly? Is it impossible for you to >>>>>>>>> buy a System76 computer which doesn't come with Windows? As far as I >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Some vendor that no one ever heard of and is not present at your >>>>>>>> local mall certainly has no relevance in a discussion about monopoly law. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> System76 is one of the top five largest suppliers of GNU/Linux machines. >>>>>>> Once again, you've demonstrated an incredible lack of knowledge. >>>>>> >>>>>> That doesn't really contradict anything I said. >>>>> >>>>> You insinuated that System76 is "some vendor no one ever heard of." >>>> >>>> Jeb is clueless as usual. >>>> >>>> It's on the first page of Google hits for "pre-loaded Linux >>>> computers" >>> >>> It's also the main sponsor of the Linux Action Show. In fact, they send >>> the guys machines to play with while they record their show. To me, that >>> speaks volumes about the profitability of the enterprise. >> >> They are a good company and if more of the hypocrite Linux >> "advocates" supported them, they might even become a great company >> and make lot's of money while promoting Linux. >> >> But the Linux "advocates" are the biggest hypocrites on the planet >> and since they also tend to be cheap they will support Microsoft >> loaded machines instead of paying a little more for a Linux vendor's >> machine. > > The hypocrisy here truly is alarming. When I first came here, I expected > the advocates to be equipped with ThinkPenguin computers (overpriced > computers using dated technology which just happens to have free > drivers). I'm surprised that they're instead feeding the Microsoft > machine by being cheapskates. They rationalize their purchases like no other group I have ever seen. In the professional audio groups there are people who will NEVER buy certain products no matter how good the offer is. And that goes for computer systems as well. They tend to practice what they preach. Linux "advocates"? They go where cheap is in and then at the same time complain about the very company and products they are supporting with their money. It's bizarre.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 15:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF993E0C.374C2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243715 |
On 5/14/14, 2:50 PM, in article ym0ftp4qhqac$.2cogypznfxjv$.dlg@40tude.net, "flatfish+++" <phlatphish@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> But the Linux "advocates" are the biggest hypocrites on the planet >>> and since they also tend to be cheap they will support Microsoft >>> loaded machines instead of paying a little more for a Linux vendor's >>> machine. >> >> The hypocrisy here truly is alarming. When I first came here, I expected >> the advocates to be equipped with ThinkPenguin computers (overpriced >> computers using dated technology which just happens to have free >> drivers). I'm surprised that they're instead feeding the Microsoft >> machine by being cheapskates. > > They rationalize their purchases like no other group I have ever > seen. > In the professional audio groups there are people who will NEVER buy > certain products no matter how good the offer is. And that goes for > computer systems as well. They tend to practice what they preach. > > Linux "advocates"? > They go where cheap is in and then at the same time complain about > the very company and products they are supporting with their money. > > It's bizarre. I use what works. I have tools from Apple, from the open source community, from Microsoft, from Logitech, from Cisco, from Motorola, from View Sonic, and from many more - I do not get the obsession with sticking to a single company or development method. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 19:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll0t3k$5p3$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243715 |
On 14-05-14 05:50 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: > On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:41:05 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > >> On 14-05-14 05:35 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>> On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:31:54 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >>> >>>> On 14-05-14 05:26 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:21:36 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 14-05-14 04:13 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Who is forcing you to pay a premium exactly? Is it impossible for you to >>>>>>>>>> buy a System76 computer which doesn't come with Windows? As far as I >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Some vendor that no one ever heard of and is not present at your >>>>>>>>> local mall certainly has no relevance in a discussion about monopoly law. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> System76 is one of the top five largest suppliers of GNU/Linux machines. >>>>>>>> Once again, you've demonstrated an incredible lack of knowledge. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That doesn't really contradict anything I said. >>>>>> >>>>>> You insinuated that System76 is "some vendor no one ever heard of." >>>>> >>>>> Jeb is clueless as usual. >>>>> >>>>> It's on the first page of Google hits for "pre-loaded Linux >>>>> computers" >>>> >>>> It's also the main sponsor of the Linux Action Show. In fact, they send >>>> the guys machines to play with while they record their show. To me, that >>>> speaks volumes about the profitability of the enterprise. >>> >>> They are a good company and if more of the hypocrite Linux >>> "advocates" supported them, they might even become a great company >>> and make lot's of money while promoting Linux. >>> >>> But the Linux "advocates" are the biggest hypocrites on the planet >>> and since they also tend to be cheap they will support Microsoft >>> loaded machines instead of paying a little more for a Linux vendor's >>> machine. >> >> The hypocrisy here truly is alarming. When I first came here, I expected >> the advocates to be equipped with ThinkPenguin computers (overpriced >> computers using dated technology which just happens to have free >> drivers). I'm surprised that they're instead feeding the Microsoft >> machine by being cheapskates. > > They rationalize their purchases like no other group I have ever > seen. > In the professional audio groups there are people who will NEVER buy > certain products no matter how good the offer is. And that goes for > computer systems as well. They tend to practice what they preach. > > Linux "advocates"? > They go where cheap is in and then at the same time complain about > the very company and products they are supporting with their money. > > It's bizarre. See, I can forgive that. What I can't forgive is the fact that they don't see anything wrong with using proprietary software. In my case, though Nouveau does an awful job and is crash-prone, it would be my objective to use it as much as possible instead of NVIDIA's drivers to make as clean a desktop as possible. I'd even use free codecs for my music and video within reason. I'm surprised that they're not pushing for the same thing. It seems like hypocrisy not to. However, I understand their position anyway as GNU/Linux is indeed all about freedom and choice. You can choose to live a clean computing life or you can choose to just use what does the best job. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-16 12:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll5g5o$ha2$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243710 |
On 5/14/2014 5:41 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: > The hypocrisy here truly is alarming. When I first came here, I expected > the advocates to be equipped with ThinkPenguin computers (overpriced > computers using dated technology which just happens to have free > drivers). I'm surprised that they're instead feeding the Microsoft > machine by being cheapskates. Not only that - some of them actually have jobs developing on and for Windows. Most run Windows at work. Like this bozo Goblin: Goob: I don't have a Windows job. DFS: What OS do you use at work? Goob: Windows. heh!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 16:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <slrnln7p3j.us4.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #243692 |
On 2014-05-14, Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote:
> On 14-05-14 04:13 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>
>>>>> Who is forcing you to pay a premium exactly? Is it impossible for you to
>>>>> buy a System76 computer which doesn't come with Windows? As far as I
>>>>
>>>> Some vendor that no one ever heard of and is not present at your
>>>> local mall certainly has no relevance in a discussion about monopoly law.
>>>
>>> System76 is one of the top five largest suppliers of GNU/Linux machines.
>>> Once again, you've demonstrated an incredible lack of knowledge.
>>
>> That doesn't really contradict anything I said.
>
> You insinuated that System76 is "some vendor no one ever heard of."
>
>> That doesn't really contradict anything I said.
--
Apple: Because the individual is not statistically meaningful. |||
/ | \
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 20:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll132v$3rt$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243718 |
JEDIDIAH wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On 2014-05-14, Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: >> On 14-05-14 04:13 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >> >>>>>> Who is forcing you to pay a premium exactly? Is it impossible for you to >>>>>> buy a System76 computer which doesn't come with Windows? As far as I >>>>> >>>>> Some vendor that no one ever heard of and is not present at your >>>>> local mall certainly has no relevance in a discussion about monopoly law. >>>> >>>> System76 is one of the top five largest suppliers of GNU/Linux machines. >>>> Once again, you've demonstrated an incredible lack of knowledge. >>> >>> That doesn't really contradict anything I said. >> >> You insinuated that System76 is "some vendor no one ever heard of." > >>> That doesn't really contradict anything I said. He probably thinks more people have heard of System76 than know that Android is based on Linux. -- Our way is peace. -- Septimus, the Son Worshiper, "Bread and Circuses", stardate 4040.7.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web