Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #470630 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-10-04 17:17 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-10-14 07:28 -0700 |
| Articles | 14 on this page of 214 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 17:17 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-05 15:48 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 17:32 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 19:37 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 07:23 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 17:00 -0700
Popular politician's rowdy teen years -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-06 05:07 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 05:32 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 09:13 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-06 16:49 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-07 14:15 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 14:33 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 08:04 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 23:58 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-08 07:17 -0500
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 05:43 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-08 15:06 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 01:15 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 18:41 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-12 07:47 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-12 14:14 +0200
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 05:43 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 01:40 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-13 05:41 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-13 12:13 +0200
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-13 05:59 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-13 04:14 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-13 14:02 +0200
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 05:21 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-13 13:48 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 14:13 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-13 18:45 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:03 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 21:12 -0700
Who isn't "owned", you ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-13 20:20 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-13 23:51 -0400
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 21:43 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 11:21 -0400
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 08:51 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 10:40 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 12:12 -0400
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 11:25 -0500
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 12:46 -0400
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 12:01 -0500
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 14:10 -0400
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 13:22 -0500
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 11:27 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 11:42 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-15 13:43 -0400
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 13:25 -0500
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-15 16:07 -0400
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 13:32 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 22:36 +0200
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-15 16:43 -0400
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 14:03 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-15 16:46 -0400
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-16 06:48 -0500
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 05:24 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-16 14:10 -0400
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 09:39 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-15 13:39 -0400
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 10:56 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 20:56 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-14 07:26 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 09:06 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-14 10:14 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-14 10:15 -0700
Just an opinion pieces written by a crack pot Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 10:18 -0700
Re: Just an opinion pieces written by a crack pot Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 11:47 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 10:52 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 11:15 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-14 12:03 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 12:34 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 13:21 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 13:37 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-14 15:07 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 15:30 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 16:45 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-14 19:44 -0700
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 00:46 +0200
Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-14 10:05 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-14 10:09 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:13 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-13 12:16 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 09:32 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:52 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 10:56 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 11:20 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-13 05:40 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-13 12:11 +0200
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-13 10:41 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 08:30 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 10:59 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:09 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 07:52 -0500
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 10:59 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 08:20 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-12 08:36 -0500
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 01:46 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 18:56 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 19:12 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-13 05:42 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 03:46 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:18 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-13 12:23 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 10:55 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 10:44 +0200
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-15 05:21 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 03:08 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-15 05:22 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 08:26 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 05:44 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-15 09:02 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 07:18 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 17:26 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 16:24 +0200
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 07:49 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 11:46 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 09:07 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 17:28 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-15 14:26 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 12:15 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-15 21:32 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 19:00 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 08:10 +0200
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 23:40 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-16 11:08 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 17:23 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 14:14 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 13:29 -0500
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 20:41 +0200
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-15 14:33 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 14:10 -0500
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 00:13 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 20:20 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 00:33 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 21:16 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 20:02 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 01:29 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 06:40 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 06:47 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-16 17:58 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 06:51 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 15:07 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-16 06:51 -0500
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-16 12:20 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-16 12:58 -0500
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 11:10 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-16 13:23 -0500
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 11:35 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-16 13:37 -0500
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 15:23 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 20:31 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 13:12 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 15:23 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-16 18:47 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 15:52 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 21:48 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-16 14:08 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 15:21 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-16 14:08 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 00:11 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 20:18 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 00:30 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 21:12 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 06:43 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 06:47 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 08:38 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-16 15:13 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 17:22 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 07:42 -0500
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 08:52 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-12 12:44 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 13:13 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 16:51 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 14:47 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 01:39 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-13 06:55 +0200
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 22:18 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-13 05:49 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-13 06:03 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:43 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 10:54 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-15 05:16 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 17:20 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-15 14:31 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 00:15 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:41 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 09:48 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-13 15:16 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 12:27 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 12:40 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 12:48 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 12:56 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 15:00 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 17:37 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-13 10:34 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-13 16:35 +0200
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-13 11:00 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 10:59 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 13:58 -0500
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 12:30 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:49 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-24 21:18 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-25 08:32 -0400
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 11:04 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-12 12:26 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-12 21:47 +0200
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 15:33 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-12 17:04 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 17:22 -0700
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 01:48 +0000
Re: Popular politician's rowdy teen years Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-13 11:03 -0700
RonB is an Ass. Enough said ... Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 07:28 -0700
Page 11 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-15 13:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vlo9sdlqjac819bs5rlk58cluuimckhuev@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #471849 |
SilverSlimer wrote: >I'm using the Democratic standards for rape in calling Booker a >rapist. Apparently, challenging a woman to a debate is now sufficient to >earn that badge On what basis do you make that ridiculous claim? ><https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/aug/10/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-wont-debate-ben-shapiro-j/> I searched that page, and found no instances of "rape" or "rapist". -- "The recent spanking the usual suspects got on the subject of Mono was priceless." - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-15 12:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <904e1f17-8675-4318-a88b-e7f0fcc09417@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #472193 |
On Monday, October 15, 2018 at 11:58:13 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: > SilverSlimer wrote: > > >I'm using the Democratic standards for rape in calling Booker a > >rapist. Apparently, challenging a woman to a debate is now sufficient to > >earn that badge > > On what basis do you make that ridiculous claim? > > ><https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/aug/10/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-wont-debate-ben-shapiro-j/> > > I searched that page, and found no instances of "rape" or "rapist". > > -- > "The recent spanking the usual suspects got on the subject of Mono was > priceless." - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark You're clueless! What did Snit expect from the lying imbecile? That Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh numbskull has nothing to blow but time. He has nothing else, especially not a life. BTW, I've already proved that his use of "herd" to describe COLA denizens is defamation of character, since he's likening them to mindless sheep. -- My Snoring Solution! https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/smzXrBhsWf4 http://tinyurl.com/proof-about-ebot https://youtu.be/48_DdtLGR9s Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-13 16:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ppt7nn$32c$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #471841 |
On 2018-10-13, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > On 2018-10-12 9:39 p.m., RonB wrote: >> On 2018-10-12, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>> >>>> >>> >>> Whatever happened, Kavanaugh proved himself unfit for a lifetime appointment >>> to the highest court in the land with his sneering non-responses and >>> a partisan and basically kooky diatribe and veiled threats about "what goes >>> around comes around". >>> >>> Some judge he is. >> >> No, Kavanaugh did NOT "prove himself unfit." He proved himself a man who >> will stand up to lies and character assassination and vigorously defend >> himself. I'm glad he wasn't a milksop. Time for people to fight back against >> the sleazy tactics of the slimy Democrats. I wasn't even a fan of Trump's >> choice when he first announced Kavanaugh's name. Now I think he's EXACTLY >> the right man for the job. Especially in this time of unhinged Democrat >> mobs. > > Well summarized. > >> By "what goes around, comes around," he meant the Democrats have lowered the >> bar to total sleaze and that their own appointments would probably meet the >> same kind of slimy attacks. But, of course, the sleazy, lying Democrats >> would miss the point and try to make his response "evil." That's what lying >> Democrats always do — attack in the most uncivil, sleazy, underhanded way, >> then whine, teary-eyed with crocodile tears, when someone defends themselves >> using some of their own tactics. Worthless slime. First time I'm going to >> vote in 22 years and it's not FOR the Republicans, it's AGAINST the slimy >> Democrats. > > The worst part about the whole thing is that they are now calling for > violence ><https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/10/10/eric-holder-when-they-go-low-we-kick-them-thats-what-this-new-democratic-party-is-about/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.93eefe17f668> ><https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/10/09/hillary-clinton-cnn-interview/1578636002/> > yet blaming the conservatives and the centrist for what _they_ are doing ><https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2018/07/05/rap-sheet-acts-of-media-approved-violence-and-harassment-against-trump-supporters/>. > If anyone had a _doubt_ that these people were evil, the evidence is > suddenly impossible to ignore. A vote for the Democrats is a vote > against American values and against the very good which has allowed the > West in general to become the world powerhouse that it is. > >> And, another thing you (and the slimy Democrats in general) can't get. >> Justice Kavanaugh was not acting as a judge at the hearing, he was acting as >> a defendant, defending himself against character assassination and serious, >> lying charges, that had ZERO evidence, ZERO witnesses and ZERO credibility. >> He had the right to be mad. If he hadn't been mad I wouldn't have considered >> a man. > > It's a testament to the man that he was able to control himself as much > as he was. When he got angry, they attacked his "temperament." When he > cried in referencing what his daughter did, they attacked his > "weakness." Meanwhile, they considered a blatant liar who was > traumatized by someone supposedly rubbing against her as "courageous." > There is no satisfying these monsters and they need to go. None of them > was any worse than Cory Booker though and I recommend that anyone who > hasn't seen it watch the way an admitted rapist (Booker) attacked > Kavanaugh in questioning. No matter what he would have done or said, he would have been attacked by the Main Stream Media Fake News Networks. They're in collusion with the reptilian slime party, the Democrats. It was all an orchestrated smear campaign and it's why I'm voting for the first time in 22 years. Not FOR the Republicans, but AGAINST the slimy, reptilian Democrats. They've crossed a line that's even too low for politicians — and that took some doing. I hope the moron Democrats keep Kavanaugh front and center. The more they talk about him, the more votes they're going to lose. Because even Democrats, those not in the Soros mobs or infected with the reptilian sleaze disease, know this character assassination attack was extremely unfair and unwarranted. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-24 21:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <RR8AD.398272$MN2.121571@fx02.iad> |
| In reply to | #471841 |
On 10/13/2018 10:34 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: 98. 915 posts: Forte Agent on Windows 99. 60 posts: Thunderbird on Linux 100. 944 posts: Pan on Linux This post: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 So you made it to 1004 posts from Linux before the GuhNoo hurt became too much to bear. 101. Last 49 posts: Mozilla on Windows 22941 total posts Last post made on 2018-10-24 0.6s
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-25 08:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <oJiAD.458401$8r2.352550@fx34.iad> |
| In reply to | #473455 |
On 2018-10-24 9:18 p.m., DFS wrote: > On 10/13/2018 10:34 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > > > 98. 915 posts: Forte Agent on Windows > 99. 60 posts: Thunderbird on Linux > 100. 944 posts: Pan on Linux > > This post: > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 > Thunderbird/60.2.1 > > > So you made it to 1004 posts from Linux before the GuhNoo hurt became > too much to bear. > > > 101. Last 49 posts: Mozilla on Windows > 22941 total posts > Last post made on 2018-10-24 > 0.6s Actually, no. I would have continued to use Linux and truly had no reason to move away even though some software that I could, theoretically, use in class are Windows-only. What ended up happening is that my Media (D:) hard disk was starting to fail. It was set up as my /home. It started off with something like 2048 bad sectors and on the next check, it had already moved up to 2060 and so on. As such, I had to remove it and replace it with an SSD counterpart. That worked for a moment and then the connector inside the laptop which allowed me to use the motherboard's built-in SATA interface also failed. Unfortunately, there is no way to get that connector on eBay and MSI doesn't respond to sales e-mails so I changed that SSD into a portable drive and bought two 256GB M.2s to use as a replacement 512GB media drive for the 1TB HD I lost. Of course, these two 256GB drives are set up in RAID0 which theoretically should work in Linux but simply doesn't for whatever reason. As such, I went to Windows. All I can say about the whole thing is thank God that Linux detected the bad sectors, kept my data intact until I made the switch and allowed me to move to another system seamlessly. -- SilverSlimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-13 11:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g2eqdmF6ta1U11@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #471769 |
On 10/12/18 6:39 PM, RonB wrote: > On 2018-10-12, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> >> >> Whatever happened, Kavanaugh proved himself unfit for a lifetime appointment >> to the highest court in the land with his sneering non-responses and >> a partisan and basically kooky diatribe and veiled threats about "what goes >> around comes around". >> >> Some judge he is. > > No, Kavanaugh did NOT "prove himself unfit." Sure he did... during his interview. But right wingers seldom care about how fit someone is as long as they will push their agenda. To be fair, the left is much the same -- if this had been the other way around and a liberal judge had made just as poor of a showing the Democrats would not have dropped their support. > He proved himself a man who > will stand up to lies and character assassination and vigorously defend > himself. I'm glad he wasn't a milksop. Time for people to fight back against > the sleazy tactics of the slimy Democrats. I wasn't even a fan of Trump's > choice when he first announced Kavanaugh's name. Now I think he's EXACTLY > the right man for the job. Especially in this time of unhinged Democrat > mobs. > > By "what goes around, comes around," he meant the Democrats have lowered the > bar to total sleaze and that their own appointments would probably meet the > same kind of slimy attacks. But, of course, the sleazy, lying Democrats > would miss the point and try to make his response "evil." That's what lying > Democrats always do — attack in the most uncivil, sleazy, underhanded way, > then whine, teary-eyed with crocodile tears, when someone defends themselves > using some of their own tactics. Worthless slime. First time I'm going to > vote in 22 years and it's not FOR the Republicans, it's AGAINST the slimy > Democrats. > > And, another thing you (and the slimy Democrats in general) can't get. > Justice Kavanaugh was not acting as a judge at the hearing, he was acting as > a defendant, defending himself against character assassination and serious, > lying charges, that had ZERO evidence, ZERO witnesses and ZERO credibility. > He had the right to be mad. If he hadn't been mad I wouldn't have considered > a man. > -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-12 12:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g2car2Flv3pU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #471332 |
On 10/9/18 6:15 PM, RonB wrote: > On 2018-10-08, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>> The bottom line... this is the problem with 100% hearsay evidence, >>> people start picking and choosing who to believe, which is absurd. >> >> For the record, I think that the outcome was the correct one. I don't >> think that Ford was lying. But, without proof, we should not be >> punishing people for something that they allegedly did *decades* >> earlier. > > I think Ford was lying through her teeth. Nothing about her testimony fits > the character of Justice Kavanaugh. Liking beer and raping women are two > completely different things — and the women who know (and knew) Justice > Kavanaugh say that he was always a gentleman with them and always respected > women. I see that, before Ford's letter was "leaked," she happened to have > flown (she does that a lot for someone so afraid of flying) to a city in > Delaware where one of the chief engineer's of the assault on Justice > Kavanaugh's character lived. Getting the story straight? > Ford may or may not have lied. Irrelevant. We know Kavanaugh did. We know he showed bias that should have excluded him from his appointment. But the Republicans did not care. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-12 21:47 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87tvlrosl8.fsf@yahoo.com> |
| In reply to | #471713 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > On 10/9/18 6:15 PM, RonB wrote: >> On 2018-10-08, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> Steve Carroll wrote: >>> >>>> The bottom line... this is the problem with 100% hearsay evidence, >>>> people start picking and choosing who to believe, which is absurd. >>> >>> For the record, I think that the outcome was the correct one. I don't >>> think that Ford was lying. But, without proof, we should not be >>> punishing people for something that they allegedly did *decades* >>> earlier. >> >> I think Ford was lying through her teeth. Nothing about her testimony fits >> the character of Justice Kavanaugh. Liking beer and raping women are two >> completely different things — and the women who know (and knew) Justice >> Kavanaugh say that he was always a gentleman with them and always respected >> women. I see that, before Ford's letter was "leaked," she happened to have >> flown (she does that a lot for someone so afraid of flying) to a city in >> Delaware where one of the chief engineer's of the assault on Justice >> Kavanaugh's character lived. Getting the story straight? >> > > Ford may or may not have lied. Irrelevant. We know Kavanaugh did. We know he > showed bias that should have excluded him from his appointment. > > But the Republicans did not care. He most certainly did not. He's a good man. Better than you. He was a judge for 12 years. Exemplary record. On top of his community work shame on you. -- any of the subatomic particles (such as protons and neutrons) that are made up of quarks and are subject to the strong force.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-12 15:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b49875f5-03e5-4362-81df-f4afc0e1d2bf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #471731 |
On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 12:47:17 PM UTC-7, Silicon Vee wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > > > On 10/9/18 6:15 PM, RonB wrote: > >> On 2018-10-08, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>> Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> > >>>> The bottom line... this is the problem with 100% hearsay evidence, > >>>> people start picking and choosing who to believe, which is absurd. > >>> > >>> For the record, I think that the outcome was the correct one. I don't > >>> think that Ford was lying. But, without proof, we should not be > >>> punishing people for something that they allegedly did *decades* > >>> earlier. > >> > >> I think Ford was lying through her teeth. Nothing about her testimony fits > >> the character of Justice Kavanaugh. Liking beer and raping women are two > >> completely different things — and the women who know (and knew) Justice > >> Kavanaugh say that he was always a gentleman with them and always respected > >> women. I see that, before Ford's letter was "leaked," she happened to have > >> flown (she does that a lot for someone so afraid of flying) to a city in > >> Delaware where one of the chief engineer's of the assault on Justice > >> Kavanaugh's character lived. Getting the story straight? > >> > > > > Ford may or may not have lied. Irrelevant. We know Kavanaugh did. We know he > > showed bias that should have excluded him from his appointment. > > > > But the Republicans did not care. > > He most certainly did not. He's a good man. Better than you. > > He was a judge for 12 years. Exemplary record. On top of his community > work shame on you. > > > > -- > any of the subatomic particles (such as protons and neutrons) that are > made up of quarks and are subject to the strong force. Usenet is a self-governing protocol based on virtue that Steve Carroll lacks. Despite Steve Carroll's claim that he has "no experience in making a spam bot" (a lie as evidenced by the fact that he hacked Jonas Eklundh's Gmail account) he was seen asking IT departments how they would trick someone to give up their password. LOL! Until Steve Carroll offers up his 'first-rate' GNU/Linux program for evaluation, there is no challenge, just wild claims. I do not grasp that. Unawareness is unawareness and there are all kinds of people who are in agreement with it. Several are even lawyers.Don't look now, but I think Steve Carroll has a serious woody for Jonas Eklundh. Frankly I do not really give a shit. -- E-commerce Simplified http://www.5z8.info/myspace-of-sex_q7q7zl_instant-purchase http://tinyurl.com/proof-about-ebot http://www.5z8.info/myspace-of-sex_q7q7zl_instant-purchase Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-12 17:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g2cr42Fpbh1U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #471731 |
On 10/12/18 12:47 PM, Silicon Vee wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > >> On 10/9/18 6:15 PM, RonB wrote: >>> On 2018-10-08, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> >>>>> The bottom line... this is the problem with 100% hearsay evidence, >>>>> people start picking and choosing who to believe, which is absurd. >>>> >>>> For the record, I think that the outcome was the correct one. I don't >>>> think that Ford was lying. But, without proof, we should not be >>>> punishing people for something that they allegedly did *decades* >>>> earlier. >>> >>> I think Ford was lying through her teeth. Nothing about her testimony fits >>> the character of Justice Kavanaugh. Liking beer and raping women are two >>> completely different things — and the women who know (and knew) Justice >>> Kavanaugh say that he was always a gentleman with them and always respected >>> women. I see that, before Ford's letter was "leaked," she happened to have >>> flown (she does that a lot for someone so afraid of flying) to a city in >>> Delaware where one of the chief engineer's of the assault on Justice >>> Kavanaugh's character lived. Getting the story straight? >>> >> >> Ford may or may not have lied. Irrelevant. We know Kavanaugh did. We know he >> showed bias that should have excluded him from his appointment. >> >> But the Republicans did not care. > > He most certainly did not. He's a good man. Better than you. > > He was a judge for 12 years. Exemplary record. On top of his community > work shame on you. > > > He proved himself unqualified in his interview. He also has a pretty bad record, including arguing for special entitlements to religious organizations [1][2], is against net neutrality (granting special entitlements to the wealthy) [3], works to limit controls on pollution (granting special entitlements to the wealthy) [4]. I will grant, on the latter, that he at least is not openly denying man-made global climate change... as so many other conservatives do. Burt even if NONE of those matter (and you can find decisions from any judge which are questionable), his utter disaster of a job interview should have lead to him not being confirmed. [1] https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/425C0AE29F10AFD785257E4B00767BF5/$file/13-5368.pdf [2] http://www.aei.org/publication/from-the-bench-the-constitutional-statesmanship-of-chief-justice-william-rehnquist/ [3] https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/06F8BFD079A89E13852581130053C3F8/$file/15-1063-1673357.pdf [4] https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/19346B280C78405C85257A61004DC0E5/$file/11-1302-1390314.pdf -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-12 17:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <897ea202-0eb6-46cd-ae16-254a3ec3661d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #471754 |
On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 5:04:22 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 10/12/18 12:47 PM, Silicon Vee wrote: > > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > > > >> On 10/9/18 6:15 PM, RonB wrote: > >>> On 2018-10-08, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>> Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> The bottom line... this is the problem with 100% hearsay evidence, > >>>>> people start picking and choosing who to believe, which is absurd. > >>>> > >>>> For the record, I think that the outcome was the correct one. I don't > >>>> think that Ford was lying. But, without proof, we should not be > >>>> punishing people for something that they allegedly did *decades* > >>>> earlier. > >>> > >>> I think Ford was lying through her teeth. Nothing about her testimony fits > >>> the character of Justice Kavanaugh. Liking beer and raping women are two > >>> completely different things — and the women who know (and knew) Justice > >>> Kavanaugh say that he was always a gentleman with them and always respected > >>> women. I see that, before Ford's letter was "leaked," she happened to have > >>> flown (she does that a lot for someone so afraid of flying) to a city in > >>> Delaware where one of the chief engineer's of the assault on Justice > >>> Kavanaugh's character lived. Getting the story straight? > >>> > >> > >> Ford may or may not have lied. Irrelevant. We know Kavanaugh did. We know he > >> showed bias that should have excluded him from his appointment. > >> > >> But the Republicans did not care. > > > > He most certainly did not. He's a good man. Better than you. > > > > He was a judge for 12 years. Exemplary record. On top of his community > > work shame on you. > > > > > > > > He proved himself unqualified in his interview. He also has a pretty bad > record, including arguing for special entitlements to religious > organizations [1][2], is against net neutrality (granting special > entitlements to the wealthy) [3], works to limit controls on pollution > (granting special entitlements to the wealthy) [4]. I will grant, on the > latter, that he at least is not openly denying man-made global climate > change... as so many other conservatives do. > > Burt even if NONE of those matter (and you can find decisions from any > judge which are questionable), his utter disaster of a job interview > should have lead to him not being confirmed. > > [1] > https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/425C0AE29F10AFD785257E4B00767BF5/$file/13-5368.pdf > > [2] > http://www.aei.org/publication/from-the-bench-the-constitutional-statesmanship-of-chief-justice-william-rehnquist/ > > [3] > https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/06F8BFD079A89E13852581130053C3F8/$file/15-1063-1673357.pdf > > [4] > https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/19346B280C78405C85257A61004DC0E5/$file/11-1302-1390314.pdf > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> What Klaus Schadenfreude does is certainly technically correct. flatfish+++ is a fool; most people have kf'd his flooding. What he really can not make is a script that keeps switching names, then flood posts have a possibility at being nearly as idiotic as he is. flatfish+++ suffers from senile lies so, to him, everything, even giving him back what he dishes out, are "abuses". Who doesn't know this? I think the point is far from just to get innocent posters to listen to him. The point is likely to piss me off for flooding outside groups he knows I frequent. That's what flatfish+++ does when he gets upset. He quickly creates a flood, starts a trolling thread so he can claim he didn't do it. Don't blame me it was my left hand... and then he responds to his own post with his right hand. You hacked it and deleted competing systems and your "extensive experience" lead you to that opinion, how amazing. - I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100012978552519 http://www.5z8.info/dont-just-drizzle_y8q4ut_5waystokillwithamelon http://www.5z8.info/creditscore_g7f8du_launchexe Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-13 01:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pprisk$rv6$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #471731 |
On 2018-10-12, Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > >> On 10/9/18 6:15 PM, RonB wrote: >>> On 2018-10-08, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> >>>>> The bottom line... this is the problem with 100% hearsay evidence, >>>>> people start picking and choosing who to believe, which is absurd. >>>> >>>> For the record, I think that the outcome was the correct one. I don't >>>> think that Ford was lying. But, without proof, we should not be >>>> punishing people for something that they allegedly did *decades* >>>> earlier. >>> >>> I think Ford was lying through her teeth. Nothing about her testimony fits >>> the character of Justice Kavanaugh. Liking beer and raping women are two >>> completely different things — and the women who know (and knew) Justice >>> Kavanaugh say that he was always a gentleman with them and always respected >>> women. I see that, before Ford's letter was "leaked," she happened to have >>> flown (she does that a lot for someone so afraid of flying) to a city in >>> Delaware where one of the chief engineer's of the assault on Justice >>> Kavanaugh's character lived. Getting the story straight? >>> >> >> Ford may or may not have lied. Irrelevant. We know Kavanaugh did. We know he >> showed bias that should have excluded him from his appointment. >> >> But the Republicans did not care. > > He most certainly did not. He's a good man. Better than you. > > He was a judge for 12 years. Exemplary record. On top of his community > work shame on you. Always treated women with respect, had a spotless reputation. (Still does in my estimation.) Not that the slimy Democrats didn't try to besmirch his name. Typical lying assholes. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-13 11:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g2eqb6F6ta1U10@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #471773 |
On 10/12/18 6:48 PM, RonB wrote: > On 2018-10-12, Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >> >>> On 10/9/18 6:15 PM, RonB wrote: >>>> On 2018-10-08, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The bottom line... this is the problem with 100% hearsay evidence, >>>>>> people start picking and choosing who to believe, which is absurd. >>>>> >>>>> For the record, I think that the outcome was the correct one. I don't >>>>> think that Ford was lying. But, without proof, we should not be >>>>> punishing people for something that they allegedly did *decades* >>>>> earlier. >>>> >>>> I think Ford was lying through her teeth. Nothing about her testimony fits >>>> the character of Justice Kavanaugh. Liking beer and raping women are two >>>> completely different things — and the women who know (and knew) Justice >>>> Kavanaugh say that he was always a gentleman with them and always respected >>>> women. I see that, before Ford's letter was "leaked," she happened to have >>>> flown (she does that a lot for someone so afraid of flying) to a city in >>>> Delaware where one of the chief engineer's of the assault on Justice >>>> Kavanaugh's character lived. Getting the story straight? >>>> >>> >>> Ford may or may not have lied. Irrelevant. We know Kavanaugh did. We know he >>> showed bias that should have excluded him from his appointment. >>> >>> But the Republicans did not care. >> >> He most certainly did not. He's a good man. Better than you. >> >> He was a judge for 12 years. Exemplary record. On top of his community >> work shame on you. > > Always treated women with respect, had a spotless reputation. (Still does in > my estimation.) Not that the slimy Democrats didn't try to besmirch his > name. Typical lying assholes. > He showed himself as utterly incapable and unqualified during his interview. Why does that not matter to those on the right? I think H. Clinton is horrid... but she conducted herself FAR better during her time in a similar position speaking to Congress. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-14 07:28 -0700 |
| Subject | RonB is an Ass. Enough said ... |
| Message-ID | <ac33b4f7-04a4-47fa-8638-baaa9b13f97e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #470630 |
On Thursday, October 4, 2018 at 1:17:04 PM UTC-4, RonB wrote: > "I was a thug for a big part of my growing up,..." > > "I got into fights. I drank and did — and consumed substances that weren't > always legal." > > "I might have drank a six-pack in an hour before going back to class, things > like that." > > And he admits to using cocaine and pot. > > His name? Barack Obama. > > And nary a peep from self-righteous, hypocritical Democrats. > > https://tinyurl.com/y8v3rnvw RonB is an Ass. Enough said ...
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web