Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #242580 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-05-08 16:07 +0000 |
| Last post | 2014-05-08 21:03 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 415 — 31 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 16:07 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 09:11 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 18:35 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 09:41 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-08 11:51 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-08 12:46 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:43 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-08 14:59 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-08 18:09 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:37 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-08 22:02 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:40 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 02:46 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:48 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 02:42 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:49 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:35 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Richard Starkey <nobody@ringo.jpunix.net> - 2014-05-08 14:23 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:35 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 21:12 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 12:27 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... John Kennerson <nobody@isis.cpunk.us> - 2014-05-08 15:25 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 18:12 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-08 12:34 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 18:46 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:42 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-08 11:17 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:41 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-08 14:42 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 13:22 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-08 19:27 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 18:34 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 07:09 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-09 07:40 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 07:47 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-09 08:02 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 08:36 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 09:51 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 09:57 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 10:13 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 16:16 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 10:53 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 11:05 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 11:19 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 17:23 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 11:45 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 17:21 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 11:46 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 11:50 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-09 10:43 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-09 11:36 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 10:42 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-09 19:13 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-09 18:25 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 16:13 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 09:16 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 10:32 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 16:39 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 10:47 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 09:34 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 11:29 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 09:35 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 10:43 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 10:42 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-09 08:18 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-09 07:07 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-09 10:11 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-09 09:20 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-09 11:30 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 11:48 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 11:52 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 03:08 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 07:52 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 09:10 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 16:27 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 10:44 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 10:48 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 10:58 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-09 17:42 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 03:12 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-12 14:01 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 03:07 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-09 10:37 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 11:14 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 11:27 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 12:46 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 09:14 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 10:30 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 16:30 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 11:27 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 09:39 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 10:44 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 11:53 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 10:42 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 18:05 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 12:14 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 18:21 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 12:28 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 12:02 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 12:07 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 12:15 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-10 12:15 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 12:05 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-10 12:13 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-10 09:29 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-11 01:45 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 20:32 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-11 03:08 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 22:13 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 10:51 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 22:06 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-11 05:06 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 07:58 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 08:32 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 08:35 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:38 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:28 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:28 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 09:44 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 16:03 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:28 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:25 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 08:00 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 08:33 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 08:36 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:28 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:39 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:51 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-12 11:06 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 10:12 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-12 08:27 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:39 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:50 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 10:30 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:37 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:29 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-12 13:10 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:29 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 10:20 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:25 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 10:49 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 11:56 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 12:25 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 12:13 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 13:03 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:30 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 13:19 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 13:36 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 11:58 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-12 12:02 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:34 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-12 16:02 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 15:28 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 16:47 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:07 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:12 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:30 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 09:39 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-13 12:28 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-12 16:10 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-12 21:40 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-13 04:24 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 13:29 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:33 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 14:44 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:52 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 09:20 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 12:58 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:30 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 15:10 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:37 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 15:50 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:53 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 19:41 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:09 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 16:50 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:21 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 18:28 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-13 15:14 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:17 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 15:04 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 22:25 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:20 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:22 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:29 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:32 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:38 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:47 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:49 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:34 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:37 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:08 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:37 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 08:22 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:33 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 16:47 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:03 -0400
Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-14 19:02 -0700
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 22:31 -0400
Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-14 22:15 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 09:04 -0400
Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 06:23 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 10:39 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 16:48 +0200
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:08 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 16:13 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:26 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 16:35 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:54 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 17:01 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 12:08 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 22:31 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 12:56 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-16 18:06 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:39 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-17 10:31 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 08:22 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-17 16:45 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 09:01 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 16:22 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-17 21:32 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 15:47 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-17 19:30 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 16:34 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-18 14:02 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-18 18:53 +0000
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 21:47 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 15:49 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 07:35 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-17 19:24 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-18 01:07 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 17:22 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-17 22:55 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 20:29 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 21:52 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 18:56 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 16:26 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:49 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:01 -0700
Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 13:25 -0700
Re: Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 18:38 -0400
Re: Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-16 00:59 +0200
Re: Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:16 -0400
How would you do this, in Linux ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 16:02 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:18 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 17:20 -0600
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:46 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:03 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 16:51 -0700
How would you do this, in Linux ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 17:02 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 20:07 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-15 23:30 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 14:52 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 16:51 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 17:09 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 18:41 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 18:55 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 20:31 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 08:20 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-17 10:39 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 10:47 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-17 20:49 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 11:57 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-05-17 20:08 +0100
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 12:29 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2014-05-18 11:44 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-18 08:45 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 08:40 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 16:27 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-17 16:24 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-17 19:53 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 21:53 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-18 11:14 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-18 09:31 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 08:36 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 08:42 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-18 17:47 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 09:15 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-18 18:28 +0000
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 11:53 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-05-18 23:09 +0100
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 16:37 -0700
Re: Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:03 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:11 -0400
I like MicroSoft -because- it's mainstream. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 13:35 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:22 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 11:09 -0600
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 14:50 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 13:25 -0600
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 18:35 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-16 00:56 +0200
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:12 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 00:15 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 12:43 +0200
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 07:43 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 17:13 -0600
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:34 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 18:21 -0600
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 20:27 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Paul <nospam@needed.com> - 2014-05-15 16:15 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 12:42 +0200
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:00 -0400
DirectX 11.1 is now part of the Windows 8 SDK. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-14 22:21 -0700
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. Jesse <jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com> - 2014-05-14 22:02 -0500
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-15 06:51 -0500
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. ?? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <gregoryhall@home.fake> - 2014-05-15 18:53 -0400
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-26 22:55 -0400
$999 Dell UltraSharp UP2414Q. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-26 21:32 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 08:20 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-15 04:33 -0700
I just bought a $430 graphics card. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 06:51 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:33 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 13:16 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 14:31 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:19 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 19:45 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:12 -0700
The Linux advantage. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-14 20:02 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-15 09:46 +0200
Re: The Linux advantage. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 02:09 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 11:29 +0200
Re: The Linux advantage. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 16:51 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage.  Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 09:55 +0200
Re: The Linux advantage. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 08:50 -0400
When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 06:35 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 10:47 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-15 09:56 -0500
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-15 10:05 -0500
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-15 12:00 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 12:03 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 22:47 +0000
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:05 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-15 23:51 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 07:41 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Siri Crews <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 04:57 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 18:10 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 18:21 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 18:45 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 18:57 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 20:40 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:54 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 18:16 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:53 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 10:03 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-20 10:11 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 21:09 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-21 07:51 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-20 16:22 +0000
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-20 10:16 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 13:29 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-20 18:53 +0000
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-20 12:11 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Tralfaz <directly_above_the_center_of_the_earth@santas_deer_poop_too_much.org> - 2014-05-20 16:24 +0000
The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-20 13:02 -0400
Re: The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-20 17:12 +0000
Re: The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-20 10:26 -0700
Re: The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 13:36 -0400
Re: The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-20 14:11 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 13:47 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 14:19 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 18:41 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 19:20 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 20:43 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 18:17 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:52 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 00:09 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 12:44 +0200
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 12:56 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 13:25 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:55 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 14:17 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 14:35 -0600
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:09 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:00 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-16 11:52 +0000
Re: The Linux advantage. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 12:01 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 09:15 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. "Steve Carroll." <fretwizzin@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 09:19 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 11:06 -0600
Re: The Linux advantage. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 13:27 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:57 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 14:18 -0400
The best relationships are all business, no bullshit. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 16:26 -0700
Re: The best relationships are all business, no bullshit. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 20:49 -0400
Re: The best relationships are all business, no bullshit. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 22:25 -0400
Compared to the internet, people are boring. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 20:25 -0700
Re: The best relationships are all business, no bullshit. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-17 10:33 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:51 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 14:40 -0600
Re: The Linux advantage. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:40 -0700
I automate Visual Studio Pro 2013, big time. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 16:07 -0700
Re: I automate Visual Studio Pro 2013, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 19:17 -0400
100% off Visual Studio Ultimate 2013, today only. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 16:59 -0700
Visual Studio 2013 costs $500; $315 to upgrade. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 15:52 -0700
Re: Visual Studio 2013 costs $500; $315 to upgrade. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 17:11 -0600
Are you using Visual Studio Pro 2010 ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 16:51 -0700
Re: Are you using Visual Studio Pro 2010 ? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 19:54 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 12:52 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:10 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:11 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:20 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 18:32 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:39 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:41 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-13 15:16 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:06 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-13 17:29 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:30 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-13 17:39 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 09:11 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 11:24 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-09 00:53 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-08 21:02 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 07:35 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-08 21:03 -0400
Page 16 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 14 15 [16] 17 18 … 21 Next page →
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-16 12:42 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. |
| Message-ID | <87sioa57jy.fsf@development.richardriley.net> |
| In reply to | #243878 |
Paul <nospam@needed.com> writes: > Silver Slimer wrote: >> On 14-05-15 01:09 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>> On 5/15/2014 8:39 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>> On 14-05-15 09:23 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>> @Silver·Slimer, When I say "DirectX 11.1 is faster", >>>>> I'm comparing it with prior versions, not OpenGL. >>>>> >>>>> Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time; >>>>> so my DirectX 11.1 code interacts with Win8 >>>>> in away that OpenGL would not, could not. >>>>> >>>>> Again: >>>>> >>>>> Mozilla FireFox/Thunderbird uses DirectX. >>>>> Linux/Unix never had the best graphics. >>>>> >>>>> DirectX 11.1 has improved support for hardware accelerated decoding -- >>>>> "WindowsCodecs.H", >>>>> .JPG, h264 ( .MP4, .MKV ), etc. >>>>> >>>>> This shows how I mix Consolas with MS Mincho: >>>>> http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Glyph.JPG >>>>> http://Jeff-Relf.Me/DirectX.CPP >>>> I await to see how DirectX 11.1 compares with the latest OpenGL. If >>>> there is no comparison whatsoever and DirectX wins handily, I'll be >>>> forced to keep my gaming PC on Windows. >>> http://www.pcgamer.com/2012/08/07/khronos-releases-opengl-4-3/#null >>> >>> This may help give an idea of to what is happening. >> >> It's not entirely clear as benchmarks aren't really offered. I get the >> impression that the end result will be that performance will strictly >> depend on the engine being used. Some will run better in GNU/Linux than >> Windows because they'll be made with OpenGL and use an engine A whereas >> some games will run better in Windows than in GNU/Linux because they >> were made with DirectX in mind. In the end, nothing will really change. >> > > There's more to it than that. > > On Windows, the OpenGL driver on regular desktop cards, > is slowed down on purpose. That's to make you buy a > "certified OpenGL card" for CAD applications. So you As opposed to turning off a few pipelines at the HW level... please... dont be such an idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-16 13:00 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. |
| Message-ID | <ll5g7i$ha2$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243878 |
On 05/15/2014 04:15 PM, Paul wrote: > There's more to it than that. > > On Windows, the OpenGL driver on regular desktop cards, > is slowed down on purpose. ha! Where do you paranoid bozos come from?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 22:21 -0700 |
| Subject | DirectX 11.1 is now part of the Windows 8 SDK. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.14{22.21.Seattle.2014}> |
| In reply to | #243773 |
DirectX 11.1 is now part of the Windows 8 SDK; no longer is it a separate SDK. Oddly, Visual Studio 2013 omits the Windows 8 SDK. ·········· @Silver·Slimer, I know nothing about OpenGL. Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time; so you must allow for multiple back buffers. And, to do that, you need a good graphics card. Also, Mozilla FireFox/Thunderbird uses DirectX; so, likely, OpenGL is -not- the way to go. Besides, Linux/Unix never had the best graphics. DirectX 11.1 has improved support for hardware accelerated decoding -- "WindowsCodecs.H", .JPG, h264 ( .MP4, .MKV ), etc. DirectX 11.1, on Windows 8, is faster because, for the first time ever, it has integerated Direct3D, Direct2D, hard/soft·ware decoders, and DirectWrite into one nice, integrated package.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jesse <jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 22:02 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. |
| Message-ID | <618d$53742e54$17750dbd$17298@nntpswitch.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #243772 |
Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> My Linux SysOp "friend" ( Jesse Rehmer, he hates me,
I hate no one. Seriously.
> BlueWorldHosting.COM ) uses a:
>
> Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller.
> Gen III PowerEdge 2950
> http://images.esellerpro.com/2131/I/789/85/SPImage%20023.JPG
>
> At home, for me, it's a different story....
>
> Fuck the Razer Naga, the Logitech g600 rules.
> http://Jeff-Relf.Me/g600.JPG
> http://Jeff-Relf.Me/g600.TXT
>
> And you ( DFS ) didn't even mention monitors.
> Mine is a 4K/UHD, IPS, 185 dpi
> on a nVidia Quadro K600, DisplayPort.
>
> DirectX 11.1, on Windows 8,
> in mindblowingly -fast- !
>
> http://Jeff-Relf.Me/DirectX.CPP
> Visual C++ 2013, is a small (one-file) example of how to:
> -- Use DirectX 11.1, Direct2D 1.1, DirectWrite, and Direct3D.
> -- Replace DirectDraw/GDI+, etc.
> -- Draw to a back buffer at a high fps (frames per second).
> -- Draw properly scaled/smoothed .JPG files, hardware accelerated.
> -- Draw to/from/within bitmaps.
> -- Discover if a font exists or not ("FindFamilyName()").
> -- Discover if a glyph exists in a font ("HasCharacter()").
> -- Discover the width/height of a glyph ("GlyphWH()").
>
> Note: This code needs Windows 8 or later.
> ScreenShot (4K/UHD): http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Glyph.JPG
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 06:51 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. ?? |
| Message-ID | <3fa9n9pp6ibk3nab5ar583ue01uggvcl6o@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #243778 |
Jesse wrote: >Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: *plonk* -- "MS does not have and never had a monopoly." - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <gregoryhall@home.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 18:53 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. ?? |
| Message-ID | <g9han9po6kuag3oe7dfjrnjrc68r0lo9lb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #243778 |
On Wed, 14 May 2014 22:02:42 -0500, Jesse <jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com> wrote: >Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> My Linux SysOp "friend" ( Jesse Rehmer, he hates me, > >I hate no one. Seriously. What about me? I bet I come close. -- Sir Gregory
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-26 22:55 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. |
| Message-ID | <lm0use$lno$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243772 |
On 5/14/2014 10:02 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > My Linux SysOp "friend" ( Jesse Rehmer, he hates me, > BlueWorldHosting.COM ) uses a: > > Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. > Gen III PowerEdge 2950 > http://images.esellerpro.com/2131/I/789/85/SPImage%20023.JPG > > At home, for me, it's a different story.... > > Fuck the Razer Naga, the Logitech g600 rules. > http://Jeff-Relf.Me/g600.JPG > http://Jeff-Relf.Me/g600.TXT Pretty sweet setup you have there - for an asylum inmate. > And you ( DFS ) didn't even mention monitors. > Mine is a 4K/UHD, IPS, 185 dpi > on a nVidia Quadro K600, DisplayPort. I've been meaning to ask how you liked that monitor. How do you like that monitor?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-26 21:32 -0700 |
| Subject | $999 Dell UltraSharp UP2414Q. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.26{21.32.Seattle.2014}> |
| In reply to | #244775 |
@DFS, You asked me: > > My monitor is a 4K/UHD, IPS, 185 dpi, > > $999 Dell UltraSharp UP2414Q, 24 inch, > > on a nVidia Quadro K600, DisplayPort. > > How do you like that monitor? I love it. It's about 18 inches from my face. It's swivelled portrait; so, in a maximized window, browsing or editing, I see a lot of text. Right now, I'm editing this post in a Visual Studio tab, 150 columns wide, 117 rows deep. I love that. http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Visual-Studio-2013-Toolbars.PNG But, in portait, it's only 29 Hz (fps); so, when the camera pans a scene, in a video, it jitters/studders. 99.9% of the time that doesn't matter, no jitter/studder. The video games I wrote/play look fine. Also, an unscaled 1080p/HD video is tiny, at the bottom of my screen, while I edit and/or browse. Often, I'm only listening, not watching; i.e. the video isn't even on the screen. My $160, 40 Watt, 200 core, Quadro K600 graphics card uses twice the watts of my (diskless) PC. My CPU is fanless, as is my 500 Watt powersupply. I bought a $430, 50 Watt, 400 core, Quadro K2000 video card, to see if it'd remove the (rare) studder... it had no effect at all, no improvement. If my monitor were 120 Hz, I'd need a more powerful, hotter/louder CPU; so it wouldn't be worth it, not for me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 08:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87siob8sw0.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #243728 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes: > On 5/14/2014 5:47 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >> On 2014-05-14, Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: >>> On 14-05-14 05:22 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>> >>>>>> ...nope, just not that concerned with minutia. >>>>>> >>>>>> Actually knowing something about the subject... That's another matter. >>>>>> >>>>>> Especially when you are quoting a pile of crap you probably don't understand. >>>>> >>>>> Speaking of quoting a pile of crap, your article basically has you >>>>> admitting that you're an idiot. Good job. >>>> >>>> Something we have known for 15 years, at least. >>>> Jeb is a green screen junkie who evidently never leaves his basement >> >> ...more of this nonsense. >> >> [deletia] >> >> Mine is probably bigger and newer than yours in all respects. > > So a HardInfo listing won't be a problem - you won't have anything to be > embarrassed about. > A P4 with 2 Megs of RAM running OpenSUSE will outperform that. Just ask any "advocate".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 04:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4e552dc3-824b-463e-ac44-e824814b770e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #243728 |
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 7:03:41 PM UTC-4, DFS wrote: > On 5/14/2014 5:47 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: > > > Mine is probably bigger and newer than yours in all respects. > > So a HardInfo listing won't be a problem - you won't have anything to be > embarrassed about. > > > Here's my Windows System Info: > > C:\Users\DFS>systeminfo > > Host Name: DFS-WIN7PRO > OS Name: Microsoft Windows 7 Professional > OS Version: 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1 Build 7601 > OS Manufacturer: Microsoft Corporation > OS Configuration: Standalone Workstation > OS Build Type: Multiprocessor Free > Registered Owner: DFS > Registered Organization: > Product ID: [redacted] > Original Install Date: 3/2/2014, 4:01:08 PM > System Boot Time: 5/14/2014, 5:59:20 PM > System Manufacturer: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. > System Model: P55A-UD3 > System Type: x64-based PC > Processor(s): 1 Processor(s) Installed. > [01]: Intel64 Family 6 Model 30 Stepping 5 > GenuineIntel ~1330 Mhz > BIOS Version: Award Software International, Inc. F6, > 2/11/2010 > Windows Directory: C:\Windows > System Directory: C:\Windows\system32 > Boot Device: \Device\HarddiskVolume1 > System Locale: en-us;English (United States) > Input Locale: en-us;English (United States) > Time Zone: (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) > Total Physical Memory: 4,091 MB > Available Physical Memory: 2,224 MB > Virtual Memory: Max Size: 8,181 MB > Virtual Memory: Available: 5,756 MB > Virtual Memory: In Use: 2,425 MB > Page File Location(s): C:\pagefile.sys > Domain: WORKGROUP Here's what the setup was of the August 2012 COLA Winner for "Top Hardware": CPU: 3.2GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon W3565 RAM: 24GB; Video: ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1GB) Monitor: 22" LCD Boot: PCIe OWC Accelsior 240GB SSD (700+MB/s in 16x slot) Data1: 4TB RAID0 internal Boot/Backup: 1TB OEM internal Time/Backup: 2TB internal * Time/primary 3TB external * Time/Backup2: 3TB external (presently on-site) * Boot/Backup2: 1TB external (presently on-site) * Data/Backup-A: 1TB (presently off-site) * Data/Backup-B: 2TB RAID1 external * Data/Backup-C: 1TB RADI1 external (presently on-site) * 200GB - Compact Flash media * 2x Hyperdrive HD-80 (photography "digial wallet") @ 120GB (max allowed capacity) * USB2 2.5" IDE 128GB - hardware spare for HD-80s, configured as a "giant thumb drive". * Linux NAS: 1.75TB (too small & slow) https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/suUIKVF8scY/sfOIbVfZbzUJ > > You have a very warped and outdated view of what a Unix user is. > > If so, it comes from you low-end bozos here on cola: RonG with his $120 > Mint crapbox, Walrus 7 with his �20 computers off eBay, rapskat with his > $50 Linux system, the constant talk about how well Linux runs on > dumpster-level hardware... it's depressing. > > > If anything, we're the early adopters. ...of systems that have already been discarded ...twice before. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 06:51 -0700 |
| Subject | I just bought a $430 graphics card. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.15{6.51.Seattle.2014}> |
| In reply to | #243819 |
<PRE Style='White-Space: PRE !important; Font-Size: 18px !important;Font-Family: monospace !important;'> Hugh wrote: > Here's what the setup was of the > August 2012 COLA Winner for "Top Hardware": > > Video: ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1GB) > Monitor: 22" LCD I just bought a $430 graphics card: nVidia Quadro K2000 Supports 3 DisplayPort monitors and 1 DVI. 384 CUDA Parallel-Processing Cores. 2 GB GDDR5 Frame Buffer Memory. 51 Watts Max. ( -very- low power usage ). https://www.google.com/search?q=Quadro+K2000 It should be almost 4 time faster than my current card, the Quadro K600.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 15:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF993D2F.374BB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243698 |
On 5/14/14, 2:29 PM, in article ll0n7t$m8v$4@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: > On 14-05-14 05:22 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: > >>>> ...nope, just not that concerned with minutia. >>>> >>>> Actually knowing something about the subject... That's another matter. >>>> >>>> Especially when you are quoting a pile of crap you probably don't >>>> understand. >>> >>> Speaking of quoting a pile of crap, your article basically has you >>> admitting that you're an idiot. Good job. >> >> Something we have known for 15 years, at least. >> Jeb is a green screen junkie who evidently never leaves his basement >> because he has absolutely no clue what people in the real world have >> to say. >> >> When he was posting as jedi, I used to think he was a bot of some >> sort because he has a very obtuse way of thinking/writing. > > The worst part for me was that I was being nice to him for a while > before he decided to just call me names. It looks like there's no reason > to be nice to a lot of the people here. To me the fact you and others are not nice is no reason for me to sink to your level. And even with you spewing your attacks against me I am still willing to give you another chance to be a reasonable person. I rarely hold grudges. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 13:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF991D20.3748B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243519 |
On 5/13/14, 3:17 PM, in article lku5ll$h7h$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: > On 14-05-13 04:14 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >> On 2014-05-13, Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> wrote: >>> On 14-05-12 05:50 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: >>> >>>>>> So pick another 'something' that I cannot do on Windows or OSX that you >>>>>> can do with Linux on the desktop. I'm all ears!! :) >>>>> >>>>> GNU/Linux would be a lot more compelling if the free software developed >>>>> primarily for IT weren't available on Windows or OS X *AT ALL* but that >>>> >>>> For IT? >>>> >>>> You've wandered off the reservation kid. >>>> >>>> IT is not the area where non-DOS platforms has the problems. >>> >>> I don't think you have even the faintest idea of what we're talking about. >>> >> >> You are truely a legend in your own mind. > > And you've provided additional evidence of being a complete imbecile by > misspelling a simple word like "truly." Ah, yes, you have now sank to spelling flames. Amazingly insightful of you! But do not worry, as long as you dance to Carroll's tune he will accept you with his loving, manipulative arms. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 14:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3417b79e-4e66-4ffb-bbfe-d7a735cff45b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #243681 |
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 8:16:16 PM UTC, Snit wrote: > On 5/13/14, 3:17 PM, in article lku5ll$h7h$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" > > <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: > > > > > On 14-05-13 04:14 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: > > >> On 2014-05-13, Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> wrote: > > >>> On 14-05-12 05:50 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote: > > >>> > > >>>>>> So pick another 'something' that I cannot do on Windows or OSX that you > > >>>>>> can do with Linux on the desktop. I'm all ears!! :) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> GNU/Linux would be a lot more compelling if the free software developed > > >>>>> primarily for IT weren't available on Windows or OS X *AT ALL* but that > > >>>> > > >>>> For IT? > > >>>> > > >>>> You've wandered off the reservation kid. > > >>>> > > >>>> IT is not the area where non-DOS platforms has the problems. > > >>> > > >>> I don't think you have even the faintest idea of what we're talking about. > > >>> > > >> > > >> You are truely a legend in your own mind. > > > > > > And you've provided additional evidence of being a complete imbecile by > > > misspelling a simple word like "truly." > > > > Ah, yes, you have now sank to spelling flames. Amazingly insightful of you! > > > > But do not worry, as long as you dance to Carroll's tune he will accept you > > with his loving, manipulative arms. > Says the person who mixes up "their" and "there" in every other post. > > -- > > * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> > > * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> > > * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> > > * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> > > * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> > > * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> > > * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> > > * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> > > * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> Another forum ruined by Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy of Prescott, Arizona 86301 http://prescottcomputerguy.com The best website design in Prescott, AZ is shown at his own site http://prescottcomputerguy.com/web-design.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 19:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll0tms$9tv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243206 |
On 5/12/2014 3:37 PM, Lloyd E Parsons wrote: > On 2014-05-12 19:10:46 +0000, Silver Slimer said: > >> On 14-05-12 02:19 PM, Lloyd E Parsons wrote: >>> On 2014-05-12 16:56:00 +0000, chrisv said: >>> >>>> JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>> >>>>> As a user of a minority platform yourself, that is a really retarded >>>>> argument to make. >>>> >>>> Despite Linux having many compelling differences, most stay away >>>> because if the relative lack of third-party support. Windwoes has the >>>> apps. Simple as that. >>> >>> None of Linux's differences are compelling on the desktop. It just is >>> not the strength of Linux no matter how much you wish it was. >> >> To be completely honest, there are certain things about the GNU/Linux >> desktop which are compelling. It's good to know that if ever I need >> software to do something which suddenly became a need, there likely is a >> program available in the repositories. It's also pretty refreshing to >> know that many of the things I would usually have to PAY to do in >> Windows (if open-source software weren't available in Windows and OS X), >> cost me nothing to do in GNU/Linux like ripping DVDs and/or CDs. > > I've done that in the past, never paid for a program to do rips with > yet. Not on Windows, not on OSX. > > So pick another 'something' that I cannot do on Windows or OSX that you > can do with Linux on the desktop. I'm all ears!! :) Not much, but the few things can be nice * package mgmt (eg sudo pacman -S gedit-plugins) of virtually all software * easy install/switching of desktops * free of cost Lots of techie stuff not available in Windows * contact and get responses from the actual developers * comprehensible and standardized filesystem hierarchy * fix crapware bugs with the actual source * save user config in separate /home partition = reinstall OS and keep your user config * dead simple to do C/C++ console coding (create simple Makefile, write code, make it, run it) * well-integrated terminal (some editors, like Geany, even have a terminal embedded in the GUI interface) * man pages * strip off ALL GUI components and boot/run it from command prompt On the other hand, Windows has the best apps and games, better peripheral hardware support, more responsive GUI, and a more consistent look and feel. On the power user/geek side, Windows has better system monitors (Resource Monitor, Performance Monitor, System Diagnostics), far superior Event logging, an ODBC administrator, Group and Security Policies. The interfaces for managing/admin Windows blow Linux interfaces away. And PowerShell on Windows seems to have duplicated most bash commands and functionality: http://cecs.wright.edu/~pmateti/Courses/233/Labs/Scripting/bashVsPowerShellTable.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 19:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ll0v6d$hq3$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243735 |
On 14-05-14 07:19 PM, DFS wrote: >> So pick another 'something' that I cannot do on Windows or OSX that you >> can do with Linux on the desktop. I'm all ears!! :) > > Not much, but the few things can be nice > > * package mgmt (eg sudo pacman -S gedit-plugins) of virtually > all software > * easy install/switching of desktops > * free of cost Being free of cost is excellent but particularly interesting for people who need to re-install after a while. If you have a Windows 7 desktop and after three years need to re-install, you're installing a 2009 OS and then have to do 5 years worth of updates IN ADDITION to re-installing all of your software and drivers. GNU/Linux's free nature allows the user to instead install a more recent version of the same OS (at no charge) in less time. The fact that the software is in the repositories as well ensures that re-installing software won't lead to any kind of malware being installed simultaneously. That's a gigantic advantage. > Lots of techie stuff not available in Windows > * contact and get responses from the actual developers As well as the ability to financially support them in exchange for certain bugs being fixed or features being implemented... or simply just to support them. > * comprehensible and standardized filesystem hierarchy Agreed. I have to agree that I much prefer the ways everything is organized in GNU/Linux despite the fact that I was born into DOS. > * fix crapware bugs with the actual source If you're capable. :P > * save user config in separate /home partition > = reinstall OS and keep your user config The first one can be accomplished with Windows by using a separate HD for the system and for the user's files. I did this for the longest time. Or, simply by creating a separate partition and ensuring that Windows stores all personal stuff in that separate partition. However, GNU/Linux allows me to do this more simply and at installation time. In no way is there a way to re-install Windows and keep user configuration though. A big plus to GNU/Linux. > * dead simple to do C/C++ console coding (create simple Makefile, write > code, make it, run it) It should be mentioned that the programming tools in GNU/Linux are also free. Anyone wishing to learn how to program can do so more easily and much more cheaply within GNU/Linux. > * well-integrated terminal (some editors, like Geany, even have a > terminal embedded in the GUI interface) And some of us prefer copying/moving files from within a terminal regardless of the fact that it's possible to perform those tasks within the GUI as in Windows or on OS X. Obviously though, these things can be accomplished within the commercial operating systems as well. > * man pages For absolutely every program. Very good point. > * strip off ALL GUI components and boot/run it from command prompt It is essentially possible for people to do all of their computing directly from within the CLI. It's obviously not always pretty but a lot of people prefer the general responsiveness and feeling of control of CLI-based programs to whatever the GUI offers. > On the other hand, Windows has the best apps and games, better > peripheral hardware support, more responsive GUI, and a more consistent > look and feel. On the power user/geek side, Windows has better system > monitors (Resource Monitor, Performance Monitor, System Diagnostics), > far superior Event logging, an ODBC administrator, Group and Security > Policies. The interfaces for managing/admin Windows blow Linux > interfaces away. It should be noted that Windows has better peripheral hardware support for RECENT hardware. For anything older than five years, Windows has terrible support and happens to be infinitely inferior to GNU/Linux which NEVER loses support for hardware and only gains it with each kernel release. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 17:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF995491.374E6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243741 |
On 5/14/14, 4:45 PM, in article ll0v6d$hq3$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: ... >> * comprehensible and standardized filesystem hierarchy > > Agreed. I have to agree that I much prefer the ways everything is > organized in GNU/Linux despite the fact that I was born into DOS. I really like the way OS X handles the User folder (though it is not perfect). Specifically things like Preferences and QuickTime extensions and the like are easy to find and move in and out of their folders to test things. This has been *reduced* in Mavericks by caching of plist files. I wish there was an easy way to flush that cache (maybe a button in the folder like the Trash has for emptying). This way you could toss preference files and test things more easily. >> * fix crapware bugs with the actual source > > If you're capable. :P > >> * save user config in separate /home partition >> = reinstall OS and keep your user config > > The first one can be accomplished with Windows by using a separate HD > for the system and for the user's files. I did this for the longest > time. Or, simply by creating a separate partition and ensuring that > Windows stores all personal stuff in that separate partition. However, > GNU/Linux allows me to do this more simply and at installation time. In > no way is there a way to re-install Windows and keep user configuration > though. A big plus to GNU/Linux. This is the norm for OS X as well. Heck, I recently re-installed my OS as part of troubleshooting (odd graphics error I sometimes run into... not a big deal but just weird). >> * dead simple to do C/C++ console coding (create simple Makefile, write >> code, make it, run it) > > It should be mentioned that the programming tools in GNU/Linux are also > free. Anyone wishing to learn how to program can do so more easily and > much more cheaply within GNU/Linux. Agreed. >> * well-integrated terminal (some editors, like Geany, even have a >> terminal embedded in the GUI interface) > > And some of us prefer copying/moving files from within a terminal > regardless of the fact that it's possible to perform those tasks within > the GUI as in Windows or on OS X. Obviously though, these things can be > accomplished within the commercial operating systems as well. Right. Still, if you live and breath in the CLI Linux is a great choice. ... >> On the other hand, Windows has the best apps and games, better >> peripheral hardware support, more responsive GUI, and a more consistent >> look and feel. On the power user/geek side, Windows has better system >> monitors (Resource Monitor, Performance Monitor, System Diagnostics), >> far superior Event logging, an ODBC administrator, Group and Security >> Policies. The interfaces for managing/admin Windows blow Linux >> interfaces away. > > It should be noted that Windows has better peripheral hardware support > for RECENT hardware. For anything older than five years, Windows has > terrible support and happens to be infinitely inferior to GNU/Linux > which NEVER loses support for hardware and only gains it with each > kernel release. Largely true. Also, the claim that Windows has the best apps is not always true, though it sometimes is. OS X has a lot of the best-of-class apps as well. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-14 20:02 -0700 |
| Subject | The Linux advantage. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.14{20.02.Seattle.2014}> |
| In reply to | #243735 |
DFS, Windows has X11 and Unix·like consoles, and you can write apps for them, e.g. slrn; so, obviously, you can't call that "a Linux advantage". Better yet, write your own console·like apps; to wit: http://Jeff-Relf.Me/X.CPP http://Jeff-Relf.Me/X.PNG http://Jeff-Relf.Me/X.HTM http://Jeff-Relf.Me/X.EXE
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 09:46 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: The Linux advantage. |
| Message-ID | <ll1rbo$mka$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243777 |
wrote: > DFS, Windows has X11 and Unix·like consoles, > and you can write apps for them, e.g. slrn; > so, obviously, you can't call that "a Linux advantage". It is a variant of X. A bad one. And yes, you can write programs for that. Unbelievable ugly ones, since they have to rely on very basic stuff. What you see on every desktop linux is not "X11" at all, it is programs written for a DE like Gnome or KDE, which provide *much* more GUI stuff than X11 alone can do. In short, your claim is not utterly wrong. It is still stupid bollocks
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 02:09 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The Linux advantage. |
| Message-ID | <CF99D261.3754D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243806 |
On 5/15/14, 12:46 AM, in article ll1rbo$mka$2@dont-email.me, "Peter
Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
> wrote:
>
>> DFS, Windows has X11 and Unix·like consoles,
>> and you can write apps for them, e.g. slrn;
>> so, obviously, you can't call that "a Linux advantage".
>
> It is a variant of X. A bad one.
> And yes, you can write programs for that.
> Unbelievable ugly ones, since they have to rely on very basic stuff.
> What you see on every desktop linux is not "X11" at all, it is programs
> written for a DE like Gnome or KDE, which provide *much* more GUI stuff than
> X11 alone can do.
>
> In short, your claim is not utterly wrong. It is still stupid bollocks
>
And yet when you are shown how a Linux distro screws up cut and paste you
claim this is because it is "standard X behaviour":
---------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Köhlmann, in reference to <http://goo.gl/IjlkV>:
-----
You both show just *again* your incredible cluelessness. That is
*standard* X behaviour, you cretins. That Snot Michael Glasser
knows *nothing* about that is normal, he is the worst "IT teacher"
of all time. He knows nothing usefull about computing.
-----
The video, of course, shows things other than just standard X
behavior. Peter never showed any understanding of this.
Message-Id: <4985cb95$0$32676$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
<http://goo.gl/0R2qow>
---------------------------------------------------------------
--
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 16 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 14 15 [16] 17 18 … 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web