Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #241195 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-05-02 11:06 +0000 |
| Last post | 2014-05-08 14:54 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 218 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
No one wants Surface tablets Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-02 11:06 +0000
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Sinister Midget <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2014-05-02 11:36 +0000
Re: No one wants Linux. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-02 07:44 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-02 13:16 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-02 10:37 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-02 11:24 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-03 02:33 +0000
Re: No one wants Linux. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-03 10:08 +0100
Re: No one wants Linux. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-03 07:25 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-03 07:09 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-03 08:59 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-03 12:57 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-03 13:54 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-03 14:31 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-03 16:58 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-03 08:58 -0700
No one wants Surface Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-03 12:46 -0400
Re: No one wants Surface flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-03 12:48 -0400
Re: No one wants Surface Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-03 12:42 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-06 07:16 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-06 07:32 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-06 07:46 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-06 09:12 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-06 15:29 +0100
Re: No one wants Linux. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-06 10:57 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-06 12:32 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-06 12:30 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-06 12:36 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-06 10:53 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-06 13:07 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-06 21:14 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-06 18:34 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-06 15:38 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-06 12:38 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-06 13:11 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-06 13:41 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-06 14:06 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-06 12:14 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-06 11:20 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-03 08:56 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-06 06:55 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-06 08:11 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-06 14:26 +0200
Re: No one wants Linux. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-06 07:44 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-06 08:04 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2014-05-06 17:00 +0200
Re: No one wants Linux. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-06 12:44 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-06 13:58 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-06 13:09 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-06 11:17 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-06 13:40 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-06 12:13 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-06 17:23 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-06 11:16 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-06 13:03 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-06 13:16 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-06 13:22 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-06 13:46 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-06 12:08 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-06 17:44 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 12:56 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-06 13:10 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-06 11:34 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-06 13:40 -0700
Many want Linux. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-06 21:10 -0400
Re: Many want Linux. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-06 21:13 -0400
Re: Many want Linux. Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-06 21:33 -0400
Re: Many want Linux. Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-06 21:30 -0400
Re: Many want Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-06 19:25 -0700
Re: Many want Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-06 18:36 -0700
Re: Many want Linux. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-06 23:40 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-06 12:43 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-06 13:14 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-06 11:33 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-06 13:44 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-06 12:09 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-06 12:41 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-06 13:13 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-06 13:25 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-06 13:42 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-06 14:49 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-06 15:55 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-06 13:51 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-07 01:21 +0200
Re: No one wants Linux. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-06 20:33 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-07 03:01 +0200
Re: No one wants Linux. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-06 21:09 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-07 10:22 +0100
Re: No one wants Linux. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-07 06:47 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-07 13:20 +0100
Re: No one wants Linux. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-07 14:38 +0200
Re: No one wants Linux. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-07 07:54 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-07 22:52 +0100
Re: No one wants Linux. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-08 06:58 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 08:24 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-07 10:16 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 19:01 +0200
Re: No one wants Linux. tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-08 01:18 +0200
Re: No one wants Linux. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-07 18:18 -0600
Re: No one wants Linux. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-08 09:01 +0100
Re: No one wants Linux. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-12 14:00 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 11:16 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 20:17 +0200
Re: No one wants Linux. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 11:33 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-06 21:21 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-06 18:34 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-06 21:50 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-06 19:21 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-06 21:04 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-06 20:51 -0600
Re: No one wants Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-06 20:23 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-06 11:19 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-06 14:30 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-06 08:00 -0500
Re: No one wants Linux. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-06 09:10 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-06 09:21 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-06 09:40 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-06 08:57 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-06 09:56 -0700
Re: No one wants Linux. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-03 08:53 -0400
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-02 08:04 -0400
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-02 08:57 -0400
Re: No one wants Surface tablets flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-02 09:04 -0400
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-02 09:16 -0400
Re: No one wants Surface tablets flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-02 09:25 -0400
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-02 10:55 -0400
Re: No one wants Surface tablets White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-02 16:04 +0100
Re: No one wants Surface tablets flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-02 11:20 -0400
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-02 11:27 -0400
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-02 17:35 +0200
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-02 09:03 -0700
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-02 11:31 -0700
Re: No one wants Surface tablets GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-02 11:01 -0600
Re: No one wants Surface tablets GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-02 10:58 -0600
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-02 12:03 -0500
Re: No one wants Surface tablets flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-02 13:53 -0400
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-02 13:34 -0500
Re: No one wants Surface tablets JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-02 14:04 -0500
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-02 14:26 -0500
Re: No one wants Surface tablets flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-02 15:49 -0400
Re: No one wants Surface tablets JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-02 14:59 -0500
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-02 15:20 -0500
Re: No one wants Surface tablets JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-02 16:00 -0500
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-02 23:11 +0200
Re: No one wants Surface tablets flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-02 17:13 -0400
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-03 00:11 +0200
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-02 22:11 -0500
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-02 18:05 -0700
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-02 22:05 -0500
My C# macro/extension hides the sign·in button. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-03 00:41 -0700
Re: No one wants Surface tablets GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-02 13:28 -0600
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-02 14:30 -0500
Re: No one wants Surface tablets GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-02 13:28 -0600
Re: No one wants Surface tablets GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-02 13:26 -0600
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-02 14:29 -0500
Re: No one wants Surface tablets GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-02 14:43 -0600
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2014-05-02 14:36 +0100
Re: No one wants Surface tablets flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-02 09:39 -0400
Re: No one wants Surface tablets "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2014-05-02 16:37 +0200
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-02 16:12 -0500
Re: No one wants Surface tablets JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-02 16:53 -0500
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-02 22:14 -0500
Re: No one wants Surface tablets Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-02 23:01 -0700
Re: Many want Linux. Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-06 20:14 -0500
Re: Many want Linux. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-06 21:15 -0400
Re: No one wants Linux. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-06 23:42 -0400
Re: Many want Linux. Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-06 20:14 -0500
Re: Many want Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-06 18:35 -0700
Re: Many want Linux. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-07 05:53 -0400
Re: Many want Linux. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-07 11:16 +0100
Re: Many want Linux. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 12:21 +0200
Re: Many want Linux. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 10:25 +0000
Re: Many want Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 08:23 -0700
Re: Many want Linux. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-07 11:08 -0500
Re: Many want Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 09:32 -0700
Re: Many want Linux. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-07 11:45 -0500
Re: Many want Linux. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-07 13:10 -0500
Re: Many want Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 11:20 -0700
Re: Many want Linux. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-07 13:25 -0500
Re: Many want Linux. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 20:39 +0200
Re: Many want Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 12:11 -0700
Re: Many want Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 12:12 -0700
Re: Many want Linux. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-07 13:16 -0500
Re: Many want Linux. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-07 13:26 -0500
Re: Many want Linux. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-07 13:48 -0500
Re: Many want Linux. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-07 12:49 -0600
Re: No one wants Linux. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-07 18:41 -0400
Re: Many want Linux. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 23:47 +0000
Re: Many want Linux. Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 16:57 -0700
Re: Many want Linux. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-07 22:14 -0500
Re: Many want Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 20:54 -0700
Re: Many want Linux. Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-07 09:05 -0400
Re: Many want Linux. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-07 10:11 -0400
Re: Many want Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 08:38 -0700
Re: Many want Linux. Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-07 12:34 -0400
Re: Many want Linux. side job scooter <sjs@aol.com> - 2014-05-08 00:16 +0000
Re: Many want Linux. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-07 20:24 -0400
Re: Many want Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 17:55 -0700
Re: Many want Linux. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-07 22:17 -0500
Re: Many want Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 20:51 -0700
Re: Many want Linux. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-08 05:55 -0400
Re: Many want Linux. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-08 07:03 -0500
Re: Many want Linux. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-08 08:47 -0400
Re: Many want Linux. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 00:28 +0000
Re: Many want Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 17:54 -0700
Re: Many want Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 17:57 -0700
Re: Many want Linux. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-07 22:04 -0400
Re: Many want Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 19:13 -0700
Re: Many want Linux. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-07 22:16 -0500
Re: Many want Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 20:53 -0700
Re: Many want Linux. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 11:44 -0700
Re: Many want Linux. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:40 -0500
Re: Many want Linux. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 12:57 -0700
Re: Many want Linux. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 13:26 -0700
Re: Many want Linux. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-08 05:54 -0400
Re: Many want Linux. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-08 11:14 +0100
Re: Many want Linux. Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-08 09:15 -0400
Re: Many want Linux. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 14:54 +0200
Page 6 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 11 Next page →
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 14:00 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: No one wants Linux. |
| Message-ID | <lkr277$nl6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #242459 |
On 5/7/2014 7:18 PM, tinus61 wrote: > I caught "Hadron" red handed, when the *LIAR* forged his headers, > pretending to use "Pine" as his mailer, The only thing you caught was a long-lasting case of Linux Idiotitis. > although development of Pine was > already deprecated for *7* years. You said something similar (and just as stupid) back then, in June 2012: <quote> The sneering bitch also *pretended* to use Pine as his mailer, about two months ago. Unfortunately for stupid Larry, development on Pine was ceased 6 (yes *SIX*) years ago. </quote> You can't be so clueless as to think that just because development has ceased, the program can no longer be installed and used? You can download a .deb package from here: https://www.washington.edu/pine/getpine/linux.html And you can get alpine from the Debian repos. I tried to build it from source for my Manjaro system, but got some strange errors. > Apparently nobody noticed :-( I noticed you made yourself look like a fool in your rush to attack Hadron. turdv does the same thing, often.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 11:16 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: No one wants Linux. |
| Message-ID | <be7cf0f3-7829-4f30-aaad-71f7d73ed03f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #243171 |
On Monday, May 12, 2014 12:00:06 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > On 5/7/2014 7:18 PM, tinus61 wrote: > > > > > > > I caught "Hadron" red handed, when the *LIAR* forged his headers, > > > pretending to use "Pine" as his mailer, > > > > The only thing you caught was a long-lasting case of Linux Idiotitis. > > > > > > > although development of Pine was > > > already deprecated for *7* years. > > > > You said something similar (and just as stupid) back then, in June 2012: > > > > <quote> > > The sneering bitch also *pretended* to use Pine as his mailer, about > > two months ago. Unfortunately for stupid Larry, development on Pine > > was ceased 6 (yes *SIX*) years ago. > > </quote> > > > > You can't be so clueless as to think that just because development has > > ceased, the program can no longer be installed and used? > > > > You can download a .deb package from here: > > https://www.washington.edu/pine/getpine/linux.html > > > > And you can get alpine from the Debian repos. > > > > I tried to build it from source for my Manjaro system, but got some > > strange errors. > > > > > > > > > > > Apparently nobody noticed :-( > > > > > > I noticed you made yourself look like a fool in your rush to attack > > Hadron. turdv does the same thing, often. As does Hadron... he's doing it in his rush to attack me for pointing to the "wrongs" Snit asks for proof of while screaming "stalker!". Maybe your point is being made more than you or even Hadron realize... maybe he should stop using Linux ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 20:17 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: No one wants Linux. |
| Message-ID | <87mwemzwrs.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #243171 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes: > On 5/7/2014 7:18 PM, tinus61 wrote: > >> I caught "Hadron" red handed, when the *LIAR* forged his headers, >> pretending to use "Pine" as his mailer, > > The only thing you caught was a long-lasting case of Linux Idiotitis. Yup. > >> although development of Pine was >> already deprecated for *7* years. > > You said something similar (and just as stupid) back then, in June 2012: > > <quote> > The sneering bitch also *pretended* to use Pine as his mailer, about > two months ago. Unfortunately for stupid Larry, development on Pine > was ceased 6 (yes *SIX*) years ago. > </quote> > > You can't be so clueless as to think that just because development has ceased, > the program can no longer be installed and used? I also have NO clue what he's talking about. I've used gnus for years and no others. I think the anal syphilis has rotted his brain. > > You can download a .deb package from here: > https://www.washington.edu/pine/getpine/linux.html > > And you can get alpine from the Debian repos. > > I tried to build it from source for my Manjaro system, but got some strange > errors. > >> Apparently nobody noticed :-( > > I noticed you made yourself look like a fool in your rush to attack Hadron. > turdv does the same thing, often. > He's also talking through his wizards pocket of an arse. It must hurt to be constantly clueless but so wanting to be a Linux 1337 for sMarti. -- "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 11:33 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: No one wants Linux. |
| Message-ID | <e81f6baf-520e-4b35-b25e-528fbcf3e4b6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #242459 |
On Wednesday, May 7, 2014 5:18:52 PM UTC-6, tinus61 wrote: (snip) > I caught "Hadron" red handed, when the *LIAR* forged his headers, > pretending to use "Pine" as his mailer, although development of Pine was > already deprecated for *7* years. Wouldn't surprise me at all to find out this happened.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-06 21:21 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: No one wants Linux. |
| Message-ID | <lkc1rk$88f$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #242206 |
On 14-05-06 08:33 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: > On Wed, 07 May 2014 01:21:12 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >> flatfish+++ wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 06 May 2014 14:49:05 -0500, chrisv wrote: >>> >>>> JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>> >>>>> You like pretending you are Stalin >>>> >>>> Ohh... That will get "Hadron's" juices flowing. What a fantasy. >>>> >>>> Committees, 5-year plans... If only *he* was dictator! *He* would >>>> determine what the "right amount" of choice is... >>>> >>>> Too bad that I could pull more "common sense" from my ass than >>>> "Hadron" has in his head. >>> >>> Yet Hadron is able to install Linux, Debian Linux at that >> >> He wasn't able to install Ubuntu, for crying out loud >> It has to be assumed that using a life-linux is way beyond his >> "capabilities" > > Plenty of people can't install Ubuntu. > Less true now than in the past but still true. > > It's irrelevant anyway. > Hadron posts from Linux using a Linux news program. > > Chrisv doesn't. > > Hadron can discuss specifics about Linux. > > Chrisv cannot. > > Why the Linux community protects what is obviously a reverse troll, a > foul one at that, is beyond me. > > And you loons claim you are not part of a herd/cult. > Laughable. All good points but Hadron is still the greatest definition of an asshole I've ever seen. I think that the reason the herd is against him is because of that and not because of his supposed lack of knowledge or whatever. -- Silver Slimer Wikipedia & OpenMedia Supporter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-06 18:34 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: No one wants Linux. |
| Message-ID | <CF8EDBC0.369E7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #242222 |
On 5/6/14, 6:21 PM, in article lkc1rk$88f$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >>> He wasn't able to install Ubuntu, for crying out loud >>> It has to be assumed that using a life-linux is way beyond his >>> "capabilities" >> >> Plenty of people can't install Ubuntu. >> Less true now than in the past but still true. >> >> It's irrelevant anyway. >> Hadron posts from Linux using a Linux news program. >> >> Chrisv doesn't. >> >> Hadron can discuss specifics about Linux. >> >> Chrisv cannot. >> >> Why the Linux community protects what is obviously a reverse troll, a >> foul one at that, is beyond me. >> >> And you loons claim you are not part of a herd/cult. >> Laughable. > > All good points but Hadron is still the greatest definition of an > asshole I've ever seen. I think that the reason the herd is against him > is because of that and not because of his supposed lack of knowledge or > whatever. How is he an "asshole"? -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-06 21:50 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: No one wants Linux. |
| Message-ID | <6z3zcmonn76i.1bp959jlwvcov$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #242222 |
On Tue, 06 May 2014 21:21:55 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 14-05-06 08:33 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: >> On Wed, 07 May 2014 01:21:12 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> >>> flatfish+++ wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 06 May 2014 14:49:05 -0500, chrisv wrote: >>>> >>>>> JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> You like pretending you are Stalin >>>>> >>>>> Ohh... That will get "Hadron's" juices flowing. What a fantasy. >>>>> >>>>> Committees, 5-year plans... If only *he* was dictator! *He* would >>>>> determine what the "right amount" of choice is... >>>>> >>>>> Too bad that I could pull more "common sense" from my ass than >>>>> "Hadron" has in his head. >>>> >>>> Yet Hadron is able to install Linux, Debian Linux at that >>> >>> He wasn't able to install Ubuntu, for crying out loud >>> It has to be assumed that using a life-linux is way beyond his >>> "capabilities" >> >> Plenty of people can't install Ubuntu. >> Less true now than in the past but still true. >> >> It's irrelevant anyway. >> Hadron posts from Linux using a Linux news program. >> >> Chrisv doesn't. >> >> Hadron can discuss specifics about Linux. >> >> Chrisv cannot. >> >> Why the Linux community protects what is obviously a reverse troll, a >> foul one at that, is beyond me. >> >> And you loons claim you are not part of a herd/cult. >> Laughable. > > All good points but Hadron is still the greatest definition of an > asshole I've ever seen. I think that the reason the herd is against him > is because of that and not because of his supposed lack of knowledge or > whatever. Hadron is stuck on snit providing evidence of his TECHNICAL claims. And I think you and I can agree that snit does provide his evidence. However, that is NOT the problem with snit and that is where Hadron goes wrong. Look at snit's history. The pages sandman has. The 163 people list etc. Trouble just seems to follow snit everywhere he goes. lol ! -- flatfish+++ 163 Reasons not to deal with Michael "Snit" Glasser, the Prescott Computer Guy http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-06 19:21 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: No one wants Linux. |
| Message-ID | <CF8EE6AC.369FF%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #242238 |
On 5/6/14, 6:50 PM, in article 6z3zcmonn76i.1bp959jlwvcov$.dlg@40tude.net, "flatfish+++" <phlatphish@yahoo.com> wrote: >> All good points but Hadron is still the greatest definition of an >> asshole I've ever seen. I think that the reason the herd is against him >> is because of that and not because of his supposed lack of knowledge or >> whatever. > > Hadron is stuck on snit providing evidence of his TECHNICAL claims. He notes I support my points well, even if I respond to those who troll me to the point that it becomes horribly boring. > And I think you and I can agree that snit does provide his evidence. Yup. And it often pisses those off who want to disagree - as it did with yu when I proved you hunch about Onion Knight wrong using technical knowledge. > However, that is NOT the problem with snit and that is where Hadron > goes wrong. > > Look at snit's history. > The pages sandman has. > The 163 people list etc. The list does not have 163 people, but even if it did so what? None of those people are *me*. You cannot show *me* doing as you accuse. And that pisses you off, too. > Trouble just seems to follow snit everywhere he goes. > lol No - only in COLA and CSMA, two groups filled with dishonest people. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-06 21:04 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: No one wants Linux. |
| Message-ID | <f2b5fd2f-d88a-4975-8791-8a63420e1a31@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #242238 |
On Tuesday, May 6, 2014 7:50:20 PM UTC-6, flatfish+++ wrote: > On Tue, 06 May 2014 21:21:55 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > > > > > On 14-05-06 08:33 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: > > >> On Wed, 07 May 2014 01:21:12 +0200, Peter K�hlmann wrote: > > >> > > >>> flatfish+++ wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> On Tue, 06 May 2014 14:49:05 -0500, chrisv wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> JEDIDIAH wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> You like pretending you are Stalin > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Ohh... That will get "Hadron's" juices flowing. What a fantasy. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Committees, 5-year plans... If only *he* was dictator! *He* would > > >>>>> determine what the "right amount" of choice is... > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Too bad that I could pull more "common sense" from my ass than > > >>>>> "Hadron" has in his head. > > >>>> > > >>>> Yet Hadron is able to install Linux, Debian Linux at that > > >>> > > >>> He wasn't able to install Ubuntu, for crying out loud > > >>> It has to be assumed that using a life-linux is way beyond his > > >>> "capabilities" > > >> > > >> Plenty of people can't install Ubuntu. > > >> Less true now than in the past but still true. > > >> > > >> It's irrelevant anyway. > > >> Hadron posts from Linux using a Linux news program. > > >> > > >> Chrisv doesn't. > > >> > > >> Hadron can discuss specifics about Linux. > > >> > > >> Chrisv cannot. > > >> > > >> Why the Linux community protects what is obviously a reverse troll, a > > >> foul one at that, is beyond me. > > >> > > >> And you loons claim you are not part of a herd/cult. > > >> Laughable. > > > > > > All good points but Hadron is still the greatest definition of an > > > asshole I've ever seen. I think that the reason the herd is against him > > > is because of that and not because of his supposed lack of knowledge or > > > whatever. > > > > Hadron is stuck on snit providing evidence of his TECHNICAL claims. > > And I think you and I can agree that snit does provide his evidence. He has but not consistently... there have been *plenty* of times where Snit's "evidence" for some of his technical claims are just as goofy as his non tech ones. One good recent "tech" example is regarding what he claims is his business... look at his *many* recent f*ckups on that topic... right down to his easily solved issue with a Linux server. Today we find out that he doesn't know when, where, why or how to use a simple redirect. How is it possible to run your own web development company, have a Master's in IT and not know that?! This is the musical equivalent of not being able to play a C chord on the piano because your main instrument is the guitar. > However, that is NOT the problem with snit and that is where Hadron > > goes wrong. Where he goes wrong is the same place Snit does, trying to sell alternative reality to people they *have* to know won't buy it (it's been going on far too long for them to not know). > Look at snit's history. > > The pages sandman has. > > The 163 people list etc. That's far from complete and it's not by chance. Those people... and all the ones not on it, have written *many* hundreds (probably more like many thousands) of posts like this about Snit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-06 20:51 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: No one wants Linux. |
| Message-ID | <vKWdnT83po4rAvTOnZ2dnUVZ_hOdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #242206 |
On 5/6/2014 6:33 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: > On Wed, 07 May 2014 01:21:12 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >> flatfish+++ wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 06 May 2014 14:49:05 -0500, chrisv wrote: >>> >>>> JEDIDIAH wrote: >>>> >>>>> You like pretending you are Stalin >>>> >>>> Ohh... That will get "Hadron's" juices flowing. What a fantasy. >>>> >>>> Committees, 5-year plans... If only *he* was dictator! *He* would >>>> determine what the "right amount" of choice is... >>>> >>>> Too bad that I could pull more "common sense" from my ass than >>>> "Hadron" has in his head. >>> >>> Yet Hadron is able to install Linux, Debian Linux at that >> >> He wasn't able to install Ubuntu, for crying out loud >> It has to be assumed that using a life-linux is way beyond his >> "capabilities" > > Plenty of people can't install Ubuntu. > Less true now than in the past but still true. > > It's irrelevant anyway. > Hadron posts from Linux using a Linux news program. > > Chrisv doesn't. > > Hadron can discuss specifics about Linux. > > Chrisv cannot. > > Why the Linux community protects what is obviously a reverse troll, a > foul one at that, is beyond me. > > And you loons claim you are not part of a herd/cult. > Laughable. > > They all give ThunderTurd a pass. -- We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true -- Robert Wilensky, 1997
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-06 20:23 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: No one wants Linux. |
| Message-ID | <CF8EF552.36A1A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #242253 |
On 5/6/14, 7:51 PM, in article vKWdnT83po4rAvTOnZ2dnUVZ_hOdnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>> He wasn't able to install Ubuntu, for crying out loud >>> It has to be assumed that using a life-linux is way beyond his >>> "capabilities" >> >> Plenty of people can't install Ubuntu. >> Less true now than in the past but still true. >> >> It's irrelevant anyway. >> Hadron posts from Linux using a Linux news program. >> >> Chrisv doesn't. >> >> Hadron can discuss specifics about Linux. >> >> Chrisv cannot. >> >> Why the Linux community protects what is obviously a reverse troll, a >> foul one at that, is beyond me. >> >> And you loons claim you are not part of a herd/cult. >> Laughable. >> >> > They all give ThunderTurd a pass. Silver Slimer, I believe, has spoken well of Thunderbird. Then again, he has also noted it is wrong to say NASA denounced global climate change... but he will not call you out on your deep ignorance and dishonesty on the issue, just as you will never note the NRA video stands unrefuted (not the "NSA" video as I posted previously - oops... both absurd groups but they are not the same!) -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-06 11:19 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: No one wants Linux. |
| Message-ID | <CF8E75D2.36965%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #242147 |
On 5/6/14, 10:41 AM, in article slrnlmi7mh.bhh.jedi@nomad.mishnet, "JEDIDIAH" <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote: > On 2014-05-06, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: >> On 2014-05-06 12:26:07 +0000, Peter Köhlmann said: >> >>> flatfish+++ wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 06 May 2014 06:55:41 -0500, chrisv wrote: >>>> >>>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Flounder has been spining that same sour record for many years. >>>>> >>>>> The troll is *obviously* mentally-ill. >>>>> >>>>>> However, >>>>>> at first the clownfish was talking about "0.24%". Now the figure he >>>>>> intones about is near 10 times that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sounds like progress to me. >>>>> >>>>> Plus Linux is coming to dominate what is the *future* of computing. >>>>> >>>>> LOL >>>>> >>>>> Poor trolls. Sucks to be them. >>>> >>>> Yea sure does <rolls eyes> ! >>> >>> It does already >>> >>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/linux-market-share >>>> >>> >>> Keep on proving that with the exception of tradional desktop linux is eating >>> all other OSs lunch. >> >> Since business is all about profits, show where Linux is producing fat >> profits for anyone. > > It's only about profit if your name is Koch. > > If your name isn't Koch, then it's about the quality and diversity of the > options the market is providing you. And that is the problem with desktop Linux: it offers lower quality and choice. It is simply not a good solution in most cases, even being free. > You have this strange delusion of grandeur. > > [deletia] > > At this point, people like you have you have been whining about about the > death of Linux for longer than most of the other alternatives were even > around. Linux has never come alive on the desktop... it is DOA... and years later. No boogieman required to understand why. > That's not a bad "actual and real world result" really. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-06 14:30 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: No one wants Linux. |
| Message-ID | <12lihyoo0ty59$.1dx6b1fiqu9x5.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #242147 |
On Tue, 6 May 2014 12:41:37 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote: > On 2014-05-06, Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: >> On 2014-05-06 12:26:07 +0000, Peter Köhlmann said: >> >>> flatfish+++ wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 06 May 2014 06:55:41 -0500, chrisv wrote: >>>> >>>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Flounder has been spining that same sour record for many years. >>>>> >>>>> The troll is *obviously* mentally-ill. >>>>> >>>>>> However, >>>>>> at first the clownfish was talking about "0.24%". Now the figure he >>>>>> intones about is near 10 times that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sounds like progress to me. >>>>> >>>>> Plus Linux is coming to dominate what is the *future* of computing. >>>>> >>>>> LOL >>>>> >>>>> Poor trolls. Sucks to be them. >>>> >>>> Yea sure does <rolls eyes> ! >>> >>> It does already >>> >>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/linux-market-share >>>> >>> >>> Keep on proving that with the exception of tradional desktop linux is eating >>> all other OSs lunch. >> >> Since business is all about profits, show where Linux is producing fat >> profits for anyone. > > It's only about profit if your name is Koch. Or George Soros. Next.... -- flatfish+++ 163 Reasons not to deal with Michael "Snit" Glasser, the Prescott Computer Guy http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-06 08:00 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: No one wants Linux. |
| Message-ID | <uimhm91nkuv3m97ecbcfmvn7cii25ubece@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #242070 |
Peter Köhlmann wrote: > mentally-ill troll wrote: > >> chrisv wrote: >>> >>> Plus Linux is coming to dominate what is the *future* of computing. >>> >>> LOL >>> >>> Poor trolls. Sucks to be them. >> >> Yea sure does <rolls eyes> ! Huh? Mobile computing is not the future? In the not-too-distant future, mobile computers will become so cheap and powerful that stationary "desktop" computers will be much less than half the market. >It does already > >> http://www.netmarketshare.com/linux-market-share > >Keep on proving that with the exception of tradional desktop linux is eating >all other OSs lunch. Poor Flathead. It really must suck to be mentally-ill, *and* fighting a losing war. -- "You can have multiple desktops on Windows too." - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-06 09:10 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: No one wants Linux. |
| Message-ID | <1hi7b2fd3qbi4.wstmjzp7yzdv$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #242078 |
On Tue, 06 May 2014 08:00:50 -0500, chrisv wrote: > Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >> mentally-ill troll wrote: >> >>> chrisv wrote: >>>> >>>> Plus Linux is coming to dominate what is the *future* of computing. >>>> >>>> LOL >>>> >>>> Poor trolls. Sucks to be them. >>> >>> Yea sure does <rolls eyes> ! > > Huh? Mobile computing is not the future? > > In the not-too-distant future, mobile computers will become so cheap > and powerful that stationary "desktop" computers will be much less > than half the market. It's not a matter of power it's a matter of ergonomics. There are some things that are just difficult to do on a mobile computer, laptop aside. Personally I think the cloud is the long term model. >>It does already >> >>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/linux-market-share >> >>Keep on proving that with the exception of tradional desktop linux is eating >>all other OSs lunch. > > Poor Flathead. It really must suck to be mentally-ill, *and* fighting > a losing war. War? What war? I'm not at war. Are you? I use what works for me, as I have said many times. Right now it's Windows. After Vista it was almost OSX. Someday it might be Linux. The only people that seem to be at war are the Linux cult. -- flatfish+++ 163 Reasons not to deal with Michael "Snit" Glasser, the Prescott Computer Guy http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-06 09:21 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: No one wants Linux. |
| Message-ID | <lkanko$q8t$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #242079 |
On 05/06/2014 09:10 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: > On Tue, 06 May 2014 08:00:50 -0500, chrisv wrote: > >> Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> >>> mentally-ill troll wrote: >>> >>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Plus Linux is coming to dominate what is the *future* of computing. >>>>> >>>>> LOL >>>>> >>>>> Poor trolls. Sucks to be them. >>>> >>>> Yea sure does <rolls eyes> ! >> >> Huh? Mobile computing is not the future? >> >> In the not-too-distant future, mobile computers will become so cheap >> and powerful that stationary "desktop" computers will be much less >> than half the market. > > It's not a matter of power it's a matter of ergonomics. > There are some things that are just difficult to do on a mobile > computer, laptop aside. > > Personally I think the cloud is the long term model. > >>> It does already >>> >>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/linux-market-share >>> >>> Keep on proving that with the exception of tradional desktop linux is eating >>> all other OSs lunch. >> >> Poor Flathead. It really must suck to be mentally-ill, *and* fighting >> a losing war. > > War? > What war? > I'm not at war. > Are you? > > I use what works for me, as I have said many times. > Right now it's Windows. After Vista it was almost OSX. > Someday it might be Linux. > > The only people that seem to be at war are the Linux cult. The war they fight is on several fronts: hygiene, social graces, earning power...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-06 09:40 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: No one wants Linux. |
| Message-ID | <sfvyucf1cze$.12011yn29jjwg.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #242082 |
On Tue, 06 May 2014 09:21:28 -0400, DFS wrote: > On 05/06/2014 09:10 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: >> On Tue, 06 May 2014 08:00:50 -0500, chrisv wrote: >> >>> Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>> >>>> mentally-ill troll wrote: >>>> >>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Plus Linux is coming to dominate what is the *future* of computing. >>>>>> >>>>>> LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> Poor trolls. Sucks to be them. >>>>> >>>>> Yea sure does <rolls eyes> ! >>> >>> Huh? Mobile computing is not the future? >>> >>> In the not-too-distant future, mobile computers will become so cheap >>> and powerful that stationary "desktop" computers will be much less >>> than half the market. >> >> It's not a matter of power it's a matter of ergonomics. >> There are some things that are just difficult to do on a mobile >> computer, laptop aside. >> >> Personally I think the cloud is the long term model. >> >>>> It does already >>>> >>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/linux-market-share >>>> >>>> Keep on proving that with the exception of tradional desktop linux is eating >>>> all other OSs lunch. >>> >>> Poor Flathead. It really must suck to be mentally-ill, *and* fighting >>> a losing war. >> >> War? >> What war? >> I'm not at war. >> Are you? >> >> I use what works for me, as I have said many times. >> Right now it's Windows. After Vista it was almost OSX. >> Someday it might be Linux. >> >> The only people that seem to be at war are the Linux cult. > > > The war they fight is on several fronts: hygiene, social graces, earning > power... Lol! The plight of the Linux basement dweller :) -- flatfish+++ 163 Reasons not to deal with Michael "Snit" Glasser, the Prescott Computer Guy http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-06 08:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: No one wants Linux. |
| Message-ID | <CF8E5475.36913%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #242079 |
On 5/6/14, 6:10 AM, in article 1hi7b2fd3qbi4.wstmjzp7yzdv$.dlg@40tude.net, "flatfish+++" <phlatphish@yahoo.com> wrote: ... >> Huh? Mobile computing is not the future? >> >> In the not-too-distant future, mobile computers will become so cheap >> and powerful that stationary "desktop" computers will be much less >> than half the market. > > It's not a matter of power it's a matter of ergonomics. > There are some things that are just difficult to do on a mobile > computer, laptop aside. > > Personally I think the cloud is the long term model. I think it will be a part of the mix, but desktop computers are not going away - and software will continue to run there for the foreseeable future. >>> It does already >>> >>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/linux-market-share >>> >>> Keep on proving that with the exception of tradional desktop linux is eating >>> all other OSs lunch. >> >> Poor Flathead. It really must suck to be mentally-ill, *and* fighting >> a losing war. > > War? > What war? > I'm not at war. > Are you? Sure you are. Look at your .sig. You are at war with the truth... attacking someone who beat you in an online debate by trying to hurt them in a personal and professional way. It is truly reprehensible. > I use what works for me, as I have said many times. > Right now it's Windows. After Vista it was almost OSX. > Someday it might be Linux. > > The only people that seem to be at war are the Linux cult. In terms of OSs, sure. But you make the "war" personal and even professional. That is an even worse sickness. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-06 09:56 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: No one wants Linux. |
| Message-ID | <aed654c3-5783-445b-bc85-01ac5377bcc9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #242099 |
On Tuesday, May 6, 2014 3:57:25 PM UTC, Snit wrote: > On 5/6/14, 6:10 AM, in article 1hi7b2fd3qbi4.wstmjzp7yzdv$.dlg@40tude.net, > > "flatfish+++" <phlatphish@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > ... > > >> Huh? Mobile computing is not the future? > > >> > > >> In the not-too-distant future, mobile computers will become so cheap > > >> and powerful that stationary "desktop" computers will be much less > > >> than half the market. > > > > > > It's not a matter of power it's a matter of ergonomics. > > > There are some things that are just difficult to do on a mobile > > > computer, laptop aside. > > > > > > Personally I think the cloud is the long term model. > > > > I think it will be a part of the mix, but desktop computers are not going > > away - and software will continue to run there for the foreseeable future. > > > > >>> It does already > > >>> > > >>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/linux-market-share > > >>> > > >>> Keep on proving that with the exception of tradional desktop linux is eating > > >>> all other OSs lunch. > > >> > > >> Poor Flathead. It really must suck to be mentally-ill, *and* fighting > > >> a losing war. > > > > > > War? > > > What war? > > > I'm not at war. > > > Are you? > > > > Sure you are. Look at your .sig. You are at war with the truth... attacking > > someone who beat you in an online debate by trying to hurt them in a > > personal and professional way. It is truly reprehensible. > > > > > I use what works for me, as I have said many times. > > > Right now it's Windows. After Vista it was almost OSX. > > > Someday it might be Linux. > > > > > > The only people that seem to be at war are the Linux cult. > > > > In terms of OSs, sure. But you make the "war" personal and even > > professional. That is an even worse sickness. > > > > -- > > * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> > > * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> > > * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> > > * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> > > * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> > > * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> > > * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> > > * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> > > * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> Another forum ruined by Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy of Prescott, Arizona 86301 http://prescottcomputerguy.com The best web design in Prescott, AZ is shown here http://prescottcomputerguy.com/web-design.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-03 08:53 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: No one wants Linux. |
| Message-ID | <112jzyl2s4ogt$.5edkmkzcxelg$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #241473 |
On Sat, 3 May 2014 02:33:47 +0000 (UTC), Tattoo Vampire wrote: > flatfish+++ wrote: > >> After 20 years of being free, desktop Linux still hovers at less than >> 2 percent of market share. >> >> Something has to be pretty darn foul when consumers won't take it >> even for free. > > Works fine for me and that's all that I care about. :-D Like I say, use what works for you! Being part of the one percent club isn't always bad :) > Now, how about those shitty Surface sales? They are indeed poor. Tough market, pricing, arriving late on the scene and the bad press Windows 8 is getting isn't helping. -- flatfish+++ 163 Reasons not to deal with Michael "Snit" Glasser, the Prescott Computer Guy http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web