Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #242580 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-05-08 16:07 +0000 |
| Last post | 2014-05-08 21:03 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 415 — 31 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 16:07 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 09:11 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 18:35 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 09:41 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-08 11:51 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-08 12:46 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:43 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-08 14:59 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-08 18:09 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:37 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-08 22:02 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:40 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 02:46 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:48 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 02:42 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:49 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:35 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Richard Starkey <nobody@ringo.jpunix.net> - 2014-05-08 14:23 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:35 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 21:12 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 12:27 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... John Kennerson <nobody@isis.cpunk.us> - 2014-05-08 15:25 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 18:12 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-08 12:34 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 18:46 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:42 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-08 11:17 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:41 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-08 14:42 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 13:22 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-08 19:27 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 18:34 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 07:09 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-09 07:40 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 07:47 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-09 08:02 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 08:36 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 09:51 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 09:57 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 10:13 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 16:16 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 10:53 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 11:05 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 11:19 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 17:23 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 11:45 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 17:21 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 11:46 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 11:50 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-09 10:43 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-09 11:36 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 10:42 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-09 19:13 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-09 18:25 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 16:13 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 09:16 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 10:32 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 16:39 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 10:47 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 09:34 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 11:29 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 09:35 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 10:43 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 10:42 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-09 08:18 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-09 07:07 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-09 10:11 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-09 09:20 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-09 11:30 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 11:48 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 11:52 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 03:08 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 07:52 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 09:10 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 16:27 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 10:44 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 10:48 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 10:58 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-09 17:42 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 03:12 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-12 14:01 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 03:07 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-09 10:37 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 11:14 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 11:27 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 12:46 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 09:14 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 10:30 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 16:30 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 11:27 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 09:39 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 10:44 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 11:53 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 10:42 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 18:05 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 12:14 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 18:21 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 12:28 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 12:02 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 12:07 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 12:15 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-10 12:15 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 12:05 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-10 12:13 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-10 09:29 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-11 01:45 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 20:32 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-11 03:08 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 22:13 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 10:51 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 22:06 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-11 05:06 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 07:58 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 08:32 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 08:35 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:38 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:28 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:28 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 09:44 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 16:03 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:28 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:25 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 08:00 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 08:33 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 08:36 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:28 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:39 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:51 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-12 11:06 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 10:12 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-12 08:27 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:39 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:50 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 10:30 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:37 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:29 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-12 13:10 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:29 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 10:20 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:25 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 10:49 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 11:56 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 12:25 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 12:13 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 13:03 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:30 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 13:19 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 13:36 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 11:58 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-12 12:02 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:34 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-12 16:02 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 15:28 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 16:47 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:07 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:12 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:30 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 09:39 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-13 12:28 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-12 16:10 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-12 21:40 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-13 04:24 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 13:29 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:33 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 14:44 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:52 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 09:20 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 12:58 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:30 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 15:10 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:37 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 15:50 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:53 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 19:41 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:09 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 16:50 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:21 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 18:28 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-13 15:14 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:17 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 15:04 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 22:25 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:20 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:22 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:29 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:32 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:38 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:47 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:49 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:34 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:37 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:08 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:37 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 08:22 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:33 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 16:47 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:03 -0400
Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-14 19:02 -0700
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 22:31 -0400
Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-14 22:15 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 09:04 -0400
Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 06:23 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 10:39 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 16:48 +0200
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:08 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 16:13 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:26 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 16:35 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:54 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 17:01 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 12:08 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 22:31 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 12:56 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-16 18:06 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:39 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-17 10:31 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 08:22 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-17 16:45 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 09:01 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 16:22 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-17 21:32 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 15:47 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-17 19:30 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 16:34 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-18 14:02 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-18 18:53 +0000
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 21:47 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 15:49 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 07:35 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-17 19:24 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-18 01:07 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 17:22 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-17 22:55 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 20:29 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 21:52 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 18:56 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 16:26 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:49 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:01 -0700
Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 13:25 -0700
Re: Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 18:38 -0400
Re: Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-16 00:59 +0200
Re: Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:16 -0400
How would you do this, in Linux ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 16:02 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:18 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 17:20 -0600
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:46 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:03 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 16:51 -0700
How would you do this, in Linux ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 17:02 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 20:07 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-15 23:30 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 14:52 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 16:51 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 17:09 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 18:41 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 18:55 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 20:31 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 08:20 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-17 10:39 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 10:47 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-17 20:49 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 11:57 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-05-17 20:08 +0100
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 12:29 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2014-05-18 11:44 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-18 08:45 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 08:40 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 16:27 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-17 16:24 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-17 19:53 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 21:53 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-18 11:14 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-18 09:31 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 08:36 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 08:42 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-18 17:47 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 09:15 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-18 18:28 +0000
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 11:53 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-05-18 23:09 +0100
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 16:37 -0700
Re: Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:03 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:11 -0400
I like MicroSoft -because- it's mainstream. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 13:35 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:22 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 11:09 -0600
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 14:50 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 13:25 -0600
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 18:35 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-16 00:56 +0200
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:12 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 00:15 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 12:43 +0200
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 07:43 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 17:13 -0600
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:34 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 18:21 -0600
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 20:27 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Paul <nospam@needed.com> - 2014-05-15 16:15 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 12:42 +0200
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:00 -0400
DirectX 11.1 is now part of the Windows 8 SDK. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-14 22:21 -0700
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. Jesse <jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com> - 2014-05-14 22:02 -0500
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-15 06:51 -0500
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. ?? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <gregoryhall@home.fake> - 2014-05-15 18:53 -0400
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-26 22:55 -0400
$999 Dell UltraSharp UP2414Q. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-26 21:32 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 08:20 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-15 04:33 -0700
I just bought a $430 graphics card. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 06:51 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:33 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 13:16 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 14:31 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:19 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 19:45 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:12 -0700
The Linux advantage. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-14 20:02 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-15 09:46 +0200
Re: The Linux advantage. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 02:09 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 11:29 +0200
Re: The Linux advantage. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 16:51 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage.  Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 09:55 +0200
Re: The Linux advantage. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 08:50 -0400
When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 06:35 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 10:47 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-15 09:56 -0500
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-15 10:05 -0500
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-15 12:00 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 12:03 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 22:47 +0000
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:05 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-15 23:51 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 07:41 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Siri Crews <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 04:57 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 18:10 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 18:21 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 18:45 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 18:57 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 20:40 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:54 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 18:16 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:53 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 10:03 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-20 10:11 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 21:09 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-21 07:51 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-20 16:22 +0000
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-20 10:16 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 13:29 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-20 18:53 +0000
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-20 12:11 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Tralfaz <directly_above_the_center_of_the_earth@santas_deer_poop_too_much.org> - 2014-05-20 16:24 +0000
The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-20 13:02 -0400
Re: The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-20 17:12 +0000
Re: The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-20 10:26 -0700
Re: The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 13:36 -0400
Re: The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-20 14:11 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 13:47 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 14:19 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 18:41 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 19:20 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 20:43 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 18:17 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:52 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 00:09 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 12:44 +0200
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 12:56 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 13:25 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:55 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 14:17 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 14:35 -0600
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:09 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:00 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-16 11:52 +0000
Re: The Linux advantage. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 12:01 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 09:15 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. "Steve Carroll." <fretwizzin@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 09:19 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 11:06 -0600
Re: The Linux advantage. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 13:27 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:57 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 14:18 -0400
The best relationships are all business, no bullshit. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 16:26 -0700
Re: The best relationships are all business, no bullshit. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 20:49 -0400
Re: The best relationships are all business, no bullshit. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 22:25 -0400
Compared to the internet, people are boring. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 20:25 -0700
Re: The best relationships are all business, no bullshit. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-17 10:33 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:51 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 14:40 -0600
Re: The Linux advantage. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:40 -0700
I automate Visual Studio Pro 2013, big time. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 16:07 -0700
Re: I automate Visual Studio Pro 2013, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 19:17 -0400
100% off Visual Studio Ultimate 2013, today only. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 16:59 -0700
Visual Studio 2013 costs $500; $315 to upgrade. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 15:52 -0700
Re: Visual Studio 2013 costs $500; $315 to upgrade. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 17:11 -0600
Are you using Visual Studio Pro 2010 ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 16:51 -0700
Re: Are you using Visual Studio Pro 2010 ? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 19:54 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 12:52 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:10 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:11 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:20 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 18:32 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:39 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:41 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-13 15:16 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:06 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-13 17:29 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:30 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-13 17:39 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 09:11 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 11:24 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-09 00:53 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-08 21:02 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 07:35 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-08 21:03 -0400
Page 17 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 … 21 Next page →
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 11:29 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: The Linux advantage. |
| Message-ID | <87fvkbbda8.fsf@development.richardriley.net> |
| In reply to | #243812 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > On 5/15/14, 12:46 AM, in article ll1rbo$mka$2@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >> wrote: >> >>> DFS, Windows has X11 and Unix·like consoles, >>> and you can write apps for them, e.g. slrn; >>> so, obviously, you can't call that "a Linux advantage". >> >> It is a variant of X. A bad one. >> And yes, you can write programs for that. >> Unbelievable ugly ones, since they have to rely on very basic stuff. >> What you see on every desktop linux is not "X11" at all, it is programs >> written for a DE like Gnome or KDE, which provide *much* more GUI stuff than >> X11 alone can do. >> >> In short, your claim is not utterly wrong. It is still stupid bollocks >> > And yet when you are shown how a Linux distro screws up cut and paste you > claim this is because it is "standard X behaviour": > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Peter Köhlmann, in reference to <http://goo.gl/IjlkV>: > ----- > You both show just *again* your incredible cluelessness. That is > *standard* X behaviour, you cretins. That Snot Michael Glasser > knows *nothing* about that is normal, he is the worst "IT teacher" > of all time. He knows nothing usefull about computing. > ----- > The video, of course, shows things other than just standard X > behavior. Peter never showed any understanding of this. > > Message-Id: <4985cb95$0$32676$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> > <http://goo.gl/0R2qow> > > --------------------------------------------------------------- You're picking at straws there. Peter was talking shit about X cut and paste as that wasnt the point since each WM/DE combo does it best *sometimes* to alter that. However we are not talking about that : rather the "X11 tyoe consoles" and other such apps - Relf is taking shit again. -- "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 16:51 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The Linux advantage. |
| Message-ID | <CF9AA123.375EB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243814 |
On 5/15/14, 2:29 AM, in article 87fvkbbda8.fsf@development.richardriley.net, "Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > >> On 5/15/14, 12:46 AM, in article ll1rbo$mka$2@dont-email.me, "Peter >> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> DFS, Windows has X11 and Unix·like consoles, >>>> and you can write apps for them, e.g. slrn; >>>> so, obviously, you can't call that "a Linux advantage". >>> >>> It is a variant of X. A bad one. >>> And yes, you can write programs for that. >>> Unbelievable ugly ones, since they have to rely on very basic stuff. >>> What you see on every desktop linux is not "X11" at all, it is programs >>> written for a DE like Gnome or KDE, which provide *much* more GUI stuff than >>> X11 alone can do. >>> >>> In short, your claim is not utterly wrong. It is still stupid bollocks >>> >> And yet when you are shown how a Linux distro screws up cut and paste you >> claim this is because it is "standard X behaviour": >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Peter Köhlmann, in reference to <http://goo.gl/IjlkV>: >> ----- >> You both show just *again* your incredible cluelessness. That is >> *standard* X behaviour, you cretins. That Snot Michael Glasser >> knows *nothing* about that is normal, he is the worst "IT teacher" >> of all time. He knows nothing usefull about computing. >> ----- >> The video, of course, shows things other than just standard X >> behavior. Peter never showed any understanding of this. >> >> Message-Id: <4985cb95$0$32676$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> >> <http://goo.gl/0R2qow> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------- > > You're picking at straws there. Peter was talking shit about X cut and > paste as that wasnt the point since each WM/DE combo does it best > *sometimes* to alter that. However we are not talking about that : > rather the "X11 tyoe consoles" and other such apps - Relf is taking shit > again. > Ah, you have caught me in two mistakes in as many days. My apologies... and thank you. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 09:55 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: The Linux advantage.  |
| Message-ID | <87lhu3tr09.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #243777 |
Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> writes: > DFS, Windows has X11 and Unix·like consoles, > and you can write apps for them, e.g. slrn; > so, obviously, you can't call that "a Linux advantage". You're joking, right? You generally dont have "X11 type apps". X11 sits way down and no one programs to those primitives, Have you met Jed? He's equally as pompous yet clueless. Amazing. > > Better yet, write your own console·like apps; to wit: > > http://Jeff-Relf.Me/X.CPP http://Jeff-Relf.Me/X.PNG > http://Jeff-Relf.Me/X.HTM http://Jeff-Relf.Me/X.EXE -- "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 08:50 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: The Linux advantage. |
| Message-ID | <ll2d6s$7il$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243777 |
On 14-05-14 11:02 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > DFS, Windows has X11 and Unix·like consoles, > and you can write apps for them, e.g. slrn; > so, obviously, you can't call that "a Linux advantage". > > Better yet, write your own console·like apps; to wit: > > http://Jeff-Relf.Me/X.CPP http://Jeff-Relf.Me/X.PNG > http://Jeff-Relf.Me/X.HTM http://Jeff-Relf.Me/X.EXE Why don't you ever quote anyone? Nobody reading your stuff has any idea who the hell you're talking to and what the hell you're referring to. Just quoting would make it a lot easier for us to communicate with you. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 06:35 -0700 |
| Subject | When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.15{6.35.Seattle.2014}> |
| In reply to | #243826 |
@Silver·Slimer, You asked/told me: > Why don't you ever quote anyone? Nobody reading your stuff has any idea > who the hell you're talking to and what the hell you're referring to. > Just quoting would make it a lot easier for us to communicate with you. When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. If you're new to the (sub)thread, and lost, check the parent post, like I do.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 10:47 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. |
| Message-ID | <ll2k2t$pt9$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243839 |
On 14-05-15 09:35 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > @Silver·Slimer, You asked/told me: >> Why don't you ever quote anyone? Nobody reading your stuff has any idea >> who the hell you're talking to and what the hell you're referring to. >> Just quoting would make it a lot easier for us to communicate with you. > > When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. > > If you're new to the (sub)thread, and lost, > check the parent post, like I do. All I can tell you is that a lot of people get upset when people use newsreaders such as Windows Live Mail because it quotes at the bottom. Even though it makes it easier for people to read (because the most important content is at the top), it's upsetting because you often don't know what the person is quoting. Therefore, the quotes themselves seem to be important. In your case, you not only don't quote but you also change the subject header. For people who prefer to read posts by date rather than by thread, it makes it hard to follow you. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 09:56 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. |
| Message-ID | <btk2soF1palU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #243844 |
On 2014-05-15 14:47:57 +0000, Silver Slimer said: > On 14-05-15 09:35 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> @Silver·Slimer, You asked/told me: >>> Why don't you ever quote anyone? Nobody reading your stuff has any idea >>> who the hell you're talking to and what the hell you're referring to. >>> Just quoting would make it a lot easier for us to communicate with you. >> >> When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. >> >> If you're new to the (sub)thread, and lost, >> check the parent post, like I do. > > All I can tell you is that a lot of people get upset when people use > newsreaders such as Windows Live Mail because it quotes at the bottom. > Even though it makes it easier for people to read (because the most > important content is at the top), it's upsetting because you often don't > know what the person is quoting. Therefore, the quotes themselves seem > to be important. > > In your case, you not only don't quote but you also change the subject > header. For people who prefer to read posts by date rather than by > thread, it makes it hard to follow you. You could do what I do, when a subject gets changed as Jeff does, with no quoting, I just assume he really doesn't want to be part of the conversation and just ignore him. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 10:05 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. |
| Message-ID | <7il9n9th60bei67s9saf8gu3r91n6pc817@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #243846 |
Lloyd E Parsons wrote: > Slimer said: >> >> Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> >> In your case, you not only don't quote but you also change the subject >> header. For people who prefer to read posts by date rather than by >> thread, it makes it hard to follow you. Trying to talk sense to Relf, eh, "Slimer"? Are you too stupid to understand that the sociopath is impervious to such advice? He's still posting in HTML, isn't he? >You could do what I do, when a subject gets changed as Jeff does, with >no quoting, I just assume he really doesn't want to be part of the >conversation and just ignore him. Better yet, just plonk the annoying bastard. -- "If Linux had gotten to the market on time and would have been presented in an effective way, many more people would be using it, too. But that did not happen and the chance is forever lost." - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 12:00 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. |
| Message-ID | <ll2oaf$pkn$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243847 |
chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > -- > "If Linux had gotten to the market on time and would have been > presented in an effective way, many more people would be using it, > too. But that did not happen and the chance is forever lost." - > "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark Jeezuz, what a propagandist! -- One way to make your old car run better is to look up the price of a new model.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 12:03 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. |
| Message-ID | <ll2ofn$qt9$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243858 |
On 14-05-15 12:00 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> -- >> "If Linux had gotten to the market on time and would have been >> presented in an effective way, many more people would be using it, >> too. But that did not happen and the chance is forever lost." - >> "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark > > Jeezuz, what a propagandist! I laughed at a Chris Ahlstrom post. This is the dawn of a new age. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 22:47 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. |
| Message-ID | <ll3g65$hkm$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243858 |
On Thu, 15 May 2014 12:00:16 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> -- >> "If Linux had gotten to the market on time and would have been >> presented in an effective way, many more people would be using it, >> too. But that did not happen and the chance is forever lost." - "True >> Linux advocate" Hadron Quark > > Jeezuz, what a propagandist! How many billions of dollars does Apple have? And they still can't get a significant chunk of the desktop monopoly. Microsoft inherited their monopoly from IBM and they kept it with ruthless (and illegal) attacks against their competitors. Unfortunately for Microsoft, their desktop monopoly is becoming much less significant. -- Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 19:05 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. |
| Message-ID | <ll3h89$q0p$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243890 |
On 14-05-15 06:47 PM, RonB wrote: > On Thu, 15 May 2014 12:00:16 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > >> chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> -- >>> "If Linux had gotten to the market on time and would have been >>> presented in an effective way, many more people would be using it, >>> too. But that did not happen and the chance is forever lost." - "True >>> Linux advocate" Hadron Quark >> >> Jeezuz, what a propagandist! > > How many billions of dollars does Apple have? And they still can't get a > significant chunk of the desktop monopoly. Microsoft inherited their > monopoly from IBM and they kept it with ruthless (and illegal) attacks > against their competitors. Unfortunately for Microsoft, their desktop > monopoly is becoming much less significant. Again, agreed. I was willing to give the corporation the benefit of the doubt even though I had every reason to believe they were spying on all Windows and Hotmail users in addition to ADMITTING it last month. However, the moment they decided to try and make me believe that my hardware was incompatible... with my hardware and refused to allow me to install the OS I paid for on the computer which required it because a simple HD was changed, I knew that they had crossed a line which should never be crossed. It's all Ubuntu for me from now on and I have no reason to prevent myself from donating to it and other GNU/Linux projects like I did for two years in the past going forward. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-15 23:51 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. |
| Message-ID | <ll41vk$i83$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243896 |
On 05/15/2014 07:05 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: > Again, agreed. I was willing to give the corporation the benefit of > the doubt even though I had every reason to believe they were spying > on all Windows and Hotmail users in addition to ADMITTING it last > month. However, the moment they decided to try and make me believe > that my hardware was incompatible... with my hardware and refused to > allow me to install the OS I paid for on the computer which required > it because a simple HD was changed, I knew that they had crossed a > line which should never be crossed. It's all Ubuntu for me from now > on and I have no reason to prevent myself from donating to it and > other GNU/Linux projects like I did for two years in the past going > forward. You keep threatening to move to Linux... you sound like you've been talking to yourself in the mirror: "It's all Ubuntu from here on out! (smack yourself in the head)... Windows is garbage (slap yourself hard)... Microsoft has gotten my last dollar! (punch the mirror and shatter it)... heh! But it'll be just like that story you told about the PlayStation and SSX game: some blowout Windows game will come along and you'll boot it right back up. Can't fool us... don't fool yourself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-16 07:41 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. |
| Message-ID | <ll4thb$dmo$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243956 |
On 14-05-15 11:51 PM, DFS wrote: > On 05/15/2014 07:05 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: > >> Again, agreed. I was willing to give the corporation the benefit of >> the doubt even though I had every reason to believe they were spying >> on all Windows and Hotmail users in addition to ADMITTING it last >> month. However, the moment they decided to try and make me believe >> that my hardware was incompatible... with my hardware and refused to >> allow me to install the OS I paid for on the computer which required >> it because a simple HD was changed, I knew that they had crossed a >> line which should never be crossed. It's all Ubuntu for me from now >> on and I have no reason to prevent myself from donating to it and >> other GNU/Linux projects like I did for two years in the past going >> forward. > > You keep threatening to move to Linux... you sound like you've been > talking to yourself in the mirror: > > "It's all Ubuntu from here on out! (smack yourself in the head)... > Windows is garbage (slap yourself hard)... Microsoft has gotten my last > dollar! (punch the mirror and shatter it)... On my laptop, the move has already been made. I'm only waiting to finish out the remaining games which are exclusive to Windows before moving my desktop to Ubuntu as well. > But it'll be just like that story you told about the PlayStation and SSX > game: some blowout Windows game will come along and you'll boot it right > back up. > > Can't fool us... don't fool yourself. It's possible, and had I still been 22 there is a possibility that I'd be swayed that easily. I'm 35 now though and I can easily say no to games nowadays. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Crews <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-16 04:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. |
| Message-ID | <chine.bleu-6198D1.04572516052014@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #243978 |
In article <ll4thb$dmo$1@dont-email.me>, Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote: > > "It's all Ubuntu from here on out! (smack yourself in the head)... > > Windows is garbage (slap yourself hard)... Microsoft has gotten my last > > dollar! (punch the mirror and shatter it)... > > On my laptop, the move has already been made. I'm only waiting to finish > out the remaining games which are exclusive to Windows before moving my > desktop to Ubuntu as well. When are they going to port X.BAT. from the Cyber 170? -- :-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' Icke's razor: Given two equally plausible explanations, choose the weirder.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-16 18:10 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. |
| Message-ID | <ll62dk$rqk$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243978 |
On 5/16/2014 7:41 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 14-05-15 11:51 PM, DFS wrote: >> On 05/15/2014 07:05 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: >> >>> Again, agreed. I was willing to give the corporation the benefit of >>> the doubt even though I had every reason to believe they were spying >>> on all Windows and Hotmail users in addition to ADMITTING it last >>> month. However, the moment they decided to try and make me believe >>> that my hardware was incompatible... with my hardware and refused to >>> allow me to install the OS I paid for on the computer which required >>> it because a simple HD was changed, I knew that they had crossed a >>> line which should never be crossed. It's all Ubuntu for me from now >>> on and I have no reason to prevent myself from donating to it and >>> other GNU/Linux projects like I did for two years in the past going >>> forward. >> >> You keep threatening to move to Linux... you sound like you've been >> talking to yourself in the mirror: >> >> "It's all Ubuntu from here on out! (smack yourself in the head)... >> Windows is garbage (slap yourself hard)... Microsoft has gotten my last >> dollar! (punch the mirror and shatter it)... > > On my laptop, the move has already been made. I'm only waiting to finish > out the remaining games which are exclusive to Windows before moving my > desktop to Ubuntu as well. Good luck with that. Depending on the xfce theme in use, I can barely read the tabs on my Excel 2003 sheets when they're opened in LibreOffice. Linux has some cool things going, but office software isn't one of them. >> But it'll be just like that story you told about the PlayStation and SSX >> game: some blowout Windows game will come along and you'll boot it right >> back up. >> >> Can't fool us... don't fool yourself. > > It's possible, and had I still been 22 there is a possibility that I'd > be swayed that easily. I'm 35 now though and I can easily say no to > games nowadays. Didn't you say you had like 100 games in your Steam acct? I don't see 'Just Say No To Games' in your future. By comparison, I have 5: Alice Madness Returns, Half-Life 2, Portal, Portal2, and RAGE (weird - I bought RAGE at BestBuy and installed it via discs - wonder how it got registered in Steam?) Was looking at Linux img mgmt software just now, and an ad for preordering 'Wolfenstein The New Order' popped up. http://www.wolfenstein.com/en-us $59.96 at Amazon http://www.amazon.com/Wolfenstein-The-New-Order-PC/dp/B00CPKUV9I/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1400277528&sr=8-2 My 60 or so Windows game titles (I've only played a few in the last 5 years). ======================================================== Age of Empires Alice - by American McGhee Alice: Madness Returns Aliens vs. Predators - Gold Edition Bioshock Bioshock 2 Black and White Bode Miller - Alpine Skiing Call of Duty Chronicles of Riddick Clive Barker's Undying Combat Flight Simulator Crysis Descent - Freespace the Great War Deus Ex Doom 3 Far Cry FEAR Final Doom Grand Theft Auto III Half-Life 1.0 Half Life 1.0 - Opposing Force Half-Life 1.0 - Initial Encounter Half-Life 1.0 - Platinum Collection Half-Life 2.0 Half-Life 2.0 Episode One Heretic II Hexen II Hexen II - Mission Pack - Portal of Praevus Homeworld - Game of Year Edition Links LS 1998 Mass Effect 2 Max Payne Medal of Honor: Allied Assault Midtown Madness 2 Motocross Madness 2 Myst III - Exile Need for Speed - Porsche Unleashed Need for Speed 2 No One Lives Forever 2 - A Spy In H.A.R.M.S. Way Painkiller Portal 1 Portal 2 PowerChess 98 Quake 2 Quake 2 - Mission Pack - Ground Zero Quake 2 - Mission Pack - The Reckoning Quake 3 - Arena Quake 4 Rage Return to Castle Wolfenstein Serious Sam - 1st Encounter Silent Hill 4 - The Room Sim Isle Star Wars Episode 1 Racer system shock 2 Unreal Unreal Gold Unreal Mission Pack 1 - Return to Na Dali Unreal Tournament Unreal Tournament 2004 ======================================================== I got Mass Effect 2 for PC real cheap ($4.99 or $9.99) at BestBuy. I might try it out this weekend.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-16 18:21 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. |
| Message-ID | <27mcl1d8txjr.ldlpr22g0zju.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #244042 |
On Fri, 16 May 2014 18:10:59 -0400, DFS wrote: > On 5/16/2014 7:41 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >> On 14-05-15 11:51 PM, DFS wrote: >>> On 05/15/2014 07:05 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>> >>>> Again, agreed. I was willing to give the corporation the benefit of >>>> the doubt even though I had every reason to believe they were spying >>>> on all Windows and Hotmail users in addition to ADMITTING it last >>>> month. However, the moment they decided to try and make me believe >>>> that my hardware was incompatible... with my hardware and refused to >>>> allow me to install the OS I paid for on the computer which required >>>> it because a simple HD was changed, I knew that they had crossed a >>>> line which should never be crossed. It's all Ubuntu for me from now >>>> on and I have no reason to prevent myself from donating to it and >>>> other GNU/Linux projects like I did for two years in the past going >>>> forward. >>> >>> You keep threatening to move to Linux... you sound like you've been >>> talking to yourself in the mirror: >>> >>> "It's all Ubuntu from here on out! (smack yourself in the head)... >>> Windows is garbage (slap yourself hard)... Microsoft has gotten my last >>> dollar! (punch the mirror and shatter it)... >> >> On my laptop, the move has already been made. I'm only waiting to finish >> out the remaining games which are exclusive to Windows before moving my >> desktop to Ubuntu as well. > > Good luck with that. > > Depending on the xfce theme in use, I can barely read the tabs on my > Excel 2003 sheets when they're opened in LibreOffice. > > Linux has some cool things going, but office software isn't one of them. I've seen this a zillion times before and the end result is always the same. Silver Slimer will return to Windows at some point because of the quality of the applications. The freedom aspect of Linux is a noble one but it doesn't last. Personally, I'm tired of spending a lot of money for DAW applications and plugins. And I'm really sick and tired of the registration/DRM aspect of it. The pirates click on setup.exe and it's installed. I have to visit web sites, download installers that basically ask for my first born and so forth. I would love to use FOSS but for DAW work it's a porker. I paid for Harrison MixBus (Professional Ardour if you will) and it's a great program but it's no ProTools or Cubase or even Studio One or Reaper or Sonar. LibraOffice is decent but it's slow, buggy and seems to have a habit of changing the colors in my spreadsheets. Amarok is good on paper. In practice it's a buggy, bloated mess. And on and on it goes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-16 18:45 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. |
| Message-ID | <ll64dc$746$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #244043 |
On 14-05-16 06:21 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: > I've seen this a zillion times before and the end result is always > the same. Silver Slimer will return to Windows at some point because > of the quality of the applications. > > The freedom aspect of Linux is a noble one but it doesn't last. That's entirely possible. I have a habit of changing my mind when it comes to the OS. If Ubuntu does something unforgivable, Windows is coming right back on I have to admit. > LibraOffice is decent but it's slow, buggy and seems to have a habit > of changing the colors in my spreadsheets. I guess it's OK if your needs are minimal as mine are. I generally only need something which is just slightly better than a text editor. > Amarok is good on paper. In practice it's a buggy, bloated mess. Agreed, but it has excellent features which only Banshee can emulate. The most important for me is the fact that it saves ratings to files. Banshee only does so with MP3 but Amarok seems to do so with M4A as well. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-16 18:57 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. |
| Message-ID | <7ebe5becza1g.6sghi4yrr69z.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #244047 |
On Fri, 16 May 2014 18:45:00 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 14-05-16 06:21 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: > >> I've seen this a zillion times before and the end result is always >> the same. Silver Slimer will return to Windows at some point because >> of the quality of the applications. >> >> The freedom aspect of Linux is a noble one but it doesn't last. > > That's entirely possible. I have a habit of changing my mind when it > comes to the OS. If Ubuntu does something unforgivable, Windows is > coming right back on I have to admit. I've done it dozens of times over the years. And it's always the applications that make me leave Linux. >> LibraOffice is decent but it's slow, buggy and seems to have a habit >> of changing the colors in my spreadsheets. > > I guess it's OK if your needs are minimal as mine are. I generally only > need something which is just slightly better than a text editor. Same here, but it can't seem to get things correct. I have no macros or anything complex like that. >> Amarok is good on paper. In practice it's a buggy, bloated mess. > > Agreed, but it has excellent features which only Banshee can emulate. > The most important for me is the fact that it saves ratings to files. > Banshee only does so with MP3 but Amarok seems to do so with M4A as well. Try Clementine. Seemed pretty good to me last time I used it under LinuxMint.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-16 20:40 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. |
| Message-ID | <ll6b6n$bq2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #244050 |
On 14-05-16 06:57 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: >> That's entirely possible. I have a habit of changing my mind when it >> comes to the OS. If Ubuntu does something unforgivable, Windows is >> coming right back on I have to admit. > > I've done it dozens of times over the years. > And it's always the applications that make me leave Linux. Well, I can't help but notice that the latest version of Rhythmbox has support for encoding music into Opus. I've been looking forward to this for a while and have heard that Opus is the best sounding lossy codec out there. I'm curious to hear how good it sounds and it's cool to see that GNU/Linux supports it way before Windows ever will. >>> LibraOffice is decent but it's slow, buggy and seems to have a habit >>> of changing the colors in my spreadsheets. >> >> I guess it's OK if your needs are minimal as mine are. I generally only >> need something which is just slightly better than a text editor. > > Same here, but it can't seem to get things correct. > I have no macros or anything complex like that. I'm sure that the LibreOffice guys did everything that they could to make it work right but the fact that the format isn't truly open didn't allow them to implement it properly. I wouldn't be surprised to discover that the documents end up looking awful in LibreOffice not because they developers implemented it badly but rather because Microsoft Office didn't follow its own guidelines. >> Agreed, but it has excellent features which only Banshee can emulate. >> The most important for me is the fact that it saves ratings to files. >> Banshee only does so with MP3 but Amarok seems to do so with M4A as well. > > Try Clementine. > Seemed pretty good to me last time I used it under LinuxMint. If I'm not mistaken, it's a Qt application. I have no interest in anything coming in from the KDE side of things. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 17 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 … 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web