Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #242580 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-05-08 16:07 +0000 |
| Last post | 2014-05-08 21:03 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 415 — 31 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 16:07 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 09:11 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 18:35 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 09:41 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-08 11:51 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-08 12:46 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:43 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-08 14:59 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-08 18:09 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:37 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-08 22:02 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:40 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 02:46 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:48 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 02:42 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:49 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:35 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Richard Starkey <nobody@ringo.jpunix.net> - 2014-05-08 14:23 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:35 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 21:12 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 12:27 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... John Kennerson <nobody@isis.cpunk.us> - 2014-05-08 15:25 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 18:12 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-08 12:34 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 18:46 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:42 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-08 11:17 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:41 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-08 14:42 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 13:22 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-08 19:27 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 18:34 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 07:09 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-09 07:40 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 07:47 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-09 08:02 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 08:36 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 09:51 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 09:57 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 10:13 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 16:16 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 10:53 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 11:05 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 11:19 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 17:23 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 11:45 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 17:21 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 11:46 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 11:50 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-09 10:43 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-09 11:36 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 10:42 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-09 19:13 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-09 18:25 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 16:13 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 09:16 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 10:32 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 16:39 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 10:47 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 09:34 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 11:29 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 09:35 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 10:43 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 10:42 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-09 08:18 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-09 07:07 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-09 10:11 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-09 09:20 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-09 11:30 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 11:48 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 11:52 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 03:08 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 07:52 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 09:10 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 16:27 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 10:44 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 10:48 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 10:58 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-09 17:42 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 03:12 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-12 14:01 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 03:07 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-09 10:37 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 11:14 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 11:27 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 12:46 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 09:14 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 10:30 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 16:30 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 11:27 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 09:39 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 10:44 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 11:53 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 10:42 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 18:05 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 12:14 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 18:21 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 12:28 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 12:02 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 12:07 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-10 12:15 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-10 12:15 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 12:05 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-10 12:13 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-10 09:29 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-11 01:45 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 20:32 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-11 03:08 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 22:13 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 10:51 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-10 22:06 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-11 05:06 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 07:58 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 08:32 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 08:35 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:38 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:28 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:28 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 09:44 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 16:03 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:28 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:25 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 08:00 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 08:33 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 08:36 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:28 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:39 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:51 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-12 11:06 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 10:12 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-12 08:27 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:39 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:50 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 10:30 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:37 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:29 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-12 13:10 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:29 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 10:20 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:25 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 10:49 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 11:56 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 12:25 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 12:13 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 13:03 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:30 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 13:19 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 13:36 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 11:58 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-12 12:02 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:34 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-12 16:02 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 15:28 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 16:47 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:07 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:12 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:30 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 09:39 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-13 12:28 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-12 16:10 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-12 21:40 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-13 04:24 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 13:29 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:33 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 14:44 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:52 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 09:20 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 12:58 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:30 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 15:10 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:37 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 15:50 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-12 14:53 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 19:41 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:09 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 16:50 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:21 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 18:28 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-13 15:14 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:17 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 15:04 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 22:25 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:20 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:22 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:29 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:32 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:38 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:47 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:49 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:34 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:37 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:08 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:37 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 08:22 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:33 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 16:47 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:03 -0400
Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-14 19:02 -0700
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 22:31 -0400
Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-14 22:15 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 09:04 -0400
Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 06:23 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 10:39 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 16:48 +0200
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:08 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 16:13 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:26 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 16:35 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:54 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 17:01 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 12:08 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 22:31 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 12:56 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-16 18:06 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:39 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-17 10:31 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 08:22 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-17 16:45 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 09:01 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 16:22 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-17 21:32 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 15:47 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-17 19:30 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 16:34 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-18 14:02 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-18 18:53 +0000
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 21:47 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 15:49 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 07:35 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-17 19:24 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-18 01:07 +0100
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 17:22 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-17 22:55 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 20:29 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 21:52 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 18:56 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 16:26 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:49 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:01 -0700
Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 13:25 -0700
Re: Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 18:38 -0400
Re: Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-16 00:59 +0200
Re: Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:16 -0400
How would you do this, in Linux ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 16:02 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:18 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 17:20 -0600
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:46 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:03 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 16:51 -0700
How would you do this, in Linux ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 17:02 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 20:07 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-15 23:30 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 14:52 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 16:51 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 17:09 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 18:41 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 18:55 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 20:31 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 08:20 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-17 10:39 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 10:47 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-17 20:49 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 11:57 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-05-17 20:08 +0100
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-17 12:29 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2014-05-18 11:44 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-18 08:45 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 08:40 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 16:27 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-17 16:24 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-17 19:53 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-17 21:53 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-18 11:14 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-18 09:31 -0400
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 08:36 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 08:42 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-18 17:47 +0200
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 09:15 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-18 18:28 +0000
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 11:53 -0700
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-05-18 23:09 +0100
Re: How would you do this, in Linux ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-18 16:37 -0700
Re: Like @snit, @Hadron is hopeless. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:03 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:11 -0400
I like MicroSoft -because- it's mainstream. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 13:35 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:22 -0700
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 11:09 -0600
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 14:50 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 13:25 -0600
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 18:35 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-16 00:56 +0200
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:12 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 00:15 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 12:43 +0200
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 07:43 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 17:13 -0600
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:34 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-15 18:21 -0600
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 20:27 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Paul <nospam@needed.com> - 2014-05-15 16:15 -0400
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 12:42 +0200
Re: Windows 8's UI uses DirectX 11.1, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:00 -0400
DirectX 11.1 is now part of the Windows 8 SDK. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-14 22:21 -0700
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. Jesse <jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com> - 2014-05-14 22:02 -0500
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-15 06:51 -0500
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. ?? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <gregoryhall@home.fake> - 2014-05-15 18:53 -0400
Re: Dual Quad Cores, with a faster RAID controller. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-26 22:55 -0400
$999 Dell UltraSharp UP2414Q. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-26 21:32 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 08:20 +0200
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-15 04:33 -0700
I just bought a $430 graphics card. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 06:51 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:33 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 13:16 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 14:31 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:19 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 19:45 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:12 -0700
The Linux advantage. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-14 20:02 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-15 09:46 +0200
Re: The Linux advantage. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 02:09 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 11:29 +0200
Re: The Linux advantage. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 16:51 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage.  Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 09:55 +0200
Re: The Linux advantage. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 08:50 -0400
When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 06:35 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 10:47 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-15 09:56 -0500
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-15 10:05 -0500
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-15 12:00 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 12:03 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 22:47 +0000
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 19:05 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-15 23:51 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 07:41 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Siri Crews <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 04:57 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 18:10 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 18:21 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 18:45 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-16 18:57 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 20:40 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:54 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 18:16 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:53 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 10:03 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-20 10:11 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 21:09 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-21 07:51 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-20 16:22 +0000
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-20 10:16 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 13:29 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-20 18:53 +0000
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-20 12:11 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Tralfaz <directly_above_the_center_of_the_earth@santas_deer_poop_too_much.org> - 2014-05-20 16:24 +0000
The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-20 13:02 -0400
Re: The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.ca> - 2014-05-20 17:12 +0000
Re: The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-20 10:26 -0700
Re: The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 13:36 -0400
Re: The average troll has the brain of a Spider Monkey flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-20 14:11 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 13:47 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-20 14:19 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 18:41 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 19:20 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 20:43 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 18:17 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:52 -0700
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 00:09 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 12:44 +0200
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 12:56 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 13:25 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:55 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 14:17 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 14:35 -0600
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 11:09 -0400
Re: When you quote too much, I dump the post, unread. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:00 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-16 11:52 +0000
Re: The Linux advantage. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 12:01 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 09:15 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. "Steve Carroll." <fretwizzin@gmail.com> - 2014-05-16 09:19 -0700
Re: The Linux advantage. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 11:06 -0600
Re: The Linux advantage. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 13:27 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:57 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 14:18 -0400
The best relationships are all business, no bullshit. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 16:26 -0700
Re: The best relationships are all business, no bullshit. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-16 20:49 -0400
Re: The best relationships are all business, no bullshit. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 22:25 -0400
Compared to the internet, people are boring. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 20:25 -0700
Re: The best relationships are all business, no bullshit. Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-17 10:33 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:51 -0400
Re: The Linux advantage. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 14:40 -0600
Re: The Linux advantage. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-16 17:40 -0700
I automate Visual Studio Pro 2013, big time. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 16:07 -0700
Re: I automate Visual Studio Pro 2013, big time. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 19:17 -0400
100% off Visual Studio Ultimate 2013, today only. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 16:59 -0700
Visual Studio 2013 costs $500; $315 to upgrade. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 15:52 -0700
Re: Visual Studio 2013 costs $500; $315 to upgrade. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 17:11 -0600
Are you using Visual Studio Pro 2010 ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-16 16:51 -0700
Re: Are you using Visual Studio Pro 2010 ? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-16 19:54 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 12:52 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:10 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:11 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:20 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 18:32 -0600
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:39 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:41 -0700
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-13 15:16 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:06 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-13 17:29 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:30 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-13 17:39 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-10 09:11 -0500
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 11:24 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-09 00:53 +0000
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-08 21:02 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 07:35 -0400
Re: And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-08 21:03 -0400
Page 1 of 21 [1] 2 3 … 21 Next page →
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 16:07 +0000 |
| Subject | And Amazon's No. 1 selling Desktop is ... |
| Message-ID | <lkga38$ck2$5@dont-email.me> |
... you guessed it, the Asus Chromebox. http://snipurl.com/28w2vdi The more expensive model, with more memory and a faster processor, is at #10. "But they'll never sell." -- Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 09:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF90FABC.36C8F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #242580 |
On 5/8/14, 9:07 AM, in article lkga38$ck2$5@dont-email.me, "RonB" <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > ... you guessed it, the Asus Chromebox. > > > http://snipurl.com/28w2vdi > > The more expensive model, with more memory and a faster processor, is at > #10. > > "But they'll never sell." Who said they would never sell. I know I have always said they have a decent chance - they are inexpensive, focused, and do away with the biggest problems of desktop Linux. They are a perfect example of why your blaming of the boogieman is wrong. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 18:35 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <878uqc5iux.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #242582 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > On 5/8/14, 9:07 AM, in article lkga38$ck2$5@dont-email.me, "RonB" > <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > >> ... you guessed it, the Asus Chromebox. >> >> >> http://snipurl.com/28w2vdi >> >> The more expensive model, with more memory and a faster processor, is at >> #10. >> >> "But they'll never sell." > > Who said they would never sell. I know I have always said they have a decent > chance - they are inexpensive, focused, and do away with the biggest > problems of desktop Linux. They are a perfect example of why your blaming of > the boogieman is wrong. I'm surprised they are selling *well* (if indeed they are) because they offer nothing a good cheap laptop can provide especially something like an old thinkpad wiped and installed with Linux. The total lack of choice in what I could run on Chrome I would find very very limiting. I prefer to have choice. Clerly wRonG and turd don't. -- "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 09:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF9101E3.36C9E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #242590 |
On 5/8/14, 9:35 AM, in article 878uqc5iux.fsf@gmail.com, "Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > >> On 5/8/14, 9:07 AM, in article lkga38$ck2$5@dont-email.me, "RonB" >> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> ... you guessed it, the Asus Chromebox. >>> >>> >>> http://snipurl.com/28w2vdi >>> >>> The more expensive model, with more memory and a faster processor, is at >>> #10. >>> >>> "But they'll never sell." >> >> Who said they would never sell. I know I have always said they have a decent >> chance - they are inexpensive, focused, and do away with the biggest >> problems of desktop Linux. They are a perfect example of why your blaming of >> the boogieman is wrong. > > I'm surprised they are selling *well* (if indeed they are) because they > offer nothing a good cheap laptop can provide especially something like > an old thinkpad wiped and installed with Linux. > > The total lack of choice in what I could run on Chrome I would find very > very limiting. I prefer to have choice. Clerly wRonG and turd don't. Well, they are good for the limited use cases they serve... and for people who do not care about privacy or, well, being "Free". Ironic how the only way Linux sells well on any desktop is to completely give up on Stallman's ideals. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 11:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bt1qvuF3kfbU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #242592 |
On 2014-05-08 16:41:55 +0000, Snit said: > On 5/8/14, 9:35 AM, in article 878uqc5iux.fsf@gmail.com, "Hadron" > <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >> >>> On 5/8/14, 9:07 AM, in article lkga38$ck2$5@dont-email.me, "RonB" >>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> ... you guessed it, the Asus Chromebox. >>>> >>>> >>>> http://snipurl.com/28w2vdi >>>> >>>> The more expensive model, with more memory and a faster processor, is at >>>> #10. >>>> >>>> "But they'll never sell." >>> >>> Who said they would never sell. I know I have always said they have a decent >>> chance - they are inexpensive, focused, and do away with the biggest >>> problems of desktop Linux. They are a perfect example of why your blaming of >>> the boogieman is wrong. >> >> I'm surprised they are selling *well* (if indeed they are) because they >> offer nothing a good cheap laptop can provide especially something like >> an old thinkpad wiped and installed with Linux. >> >> The total lack of choice in what I could run on Chrome I would find very >> very limiting. I prefer to have choice. Clerly wRonG and turd don't. > > Well, they are good for the limited use cases they serve... and for people > who do not care about privacy or, well, being "Free". Ironic how the only > way Linux sells well on any desktop is to completely give up on Stallman's > ideals. You weren't supposed to notice that! -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 12:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <49gnm91vvg6nj5m955e7o7e9qk294e2lhd@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #242599 |
Lloyd E Parsons wrote: >> Ironic how the only >> way Linux sells well on any desktop is to completely give up on Stallman's >> ideals. Nothing "ironic" at all, actually. >You weren't supposed to notice that! Really? Who hasn't noticed that Stallman has rather radical viewpoints, and that his "all software should be Free" stance is really not viable? I've said it before: There's nothing wrong with closed-source software. There's nothing wrong with mixing open- and closed-source software. Both the open- and closed-source software models are needed, to optimally serve the market. Duh. -- "nOObs don't need fly by night garageware." - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 11:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF911E5E.36CD8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #242618 |
On 5/8/14, 10:46 AM, in article 49gnm91vvg6nj5m955e7o7e9qk294e2lhd@4ax.com, "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > Lloyd E Parsons wrote: > >>> Ironic how the only >>> way Linux sells well on any desktop is to completely give up on Stallman's >>> ideals. > > Nothing "ironic" at all, actually. > >> You weren't supposed to notice that! > > Really? Who hasn't noticed that Stallman has rather radical > viewpoints, and that his "all software should be Free" stance is > really not viable? > > I've said it before: There's nothing wrong with closed-source > software. There's nothing wrong with mixing open- and closed-source > software. Both the open- and closed-source software models are > needed, to optimally serve the market. > > Duh. So what is your problem with those of us who advocate such? LOL! -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 14:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <m56jlqe2gpph.pyu30xuutme5.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #242618 |
On Thu, 08 May 2014 12:46:38 -0500, chrisv wrote: > Lloyd E Parsons wrote: > >>> Ironic how the only >>> way Linux sells well on any desktop is to completely give up on Stallman's >>> ideals. > > Nothing "ironic" at all, actually. > >>You weren't supposed to notice that! > > Really? Who hasn't noticed that Stallman has rather radical > viewpoints, and that his "all software should be Free" stance is > really not viable? Roy Schestowitz. Homer. Many others from that Techrights den of vipers. > I've said it before: There's nothing wrong with closed-source > software. There's nothing wrong with mixing open- and closed-source > software. Both the open- and closed-source software models are > needed, to optimally serve the market. Obviously since you use the Windows program Agent. X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564 Are you still having troubles installing Linux, chrisv? Remember, we are here to help!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 18:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lkgvae$3kv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #242618 |
On 14-05-08 01:46 PM, chrisv wrote: > Lloyd E Parsons wrote: > >>> Ironic how the only >>> way Linux sells well on any desktop is to completely give up on Stallman's >>> ideals. > > Nothing "ironic" at all, actually. People don't realize that RMS is at best an influential figure but by no means a leader. If manufacturers and developers were to abide by every one of his rules, it would literally be impossible to make any kind of profit from software. His ideas for hardware design aren't bad though. I also begrudgingly agree with his ideas on how to compensate musicians for their work, especially in light of the news that musicians tend never to get any kind of compensation at all. >> You weren't supposed to notice that! > > Really? Who hasn't noticed that Stallman has rather radical > viewpoints, and that his "all software should be Free" stance is > really not viable? > > I've said it before: There's nothing wrong with closed-source > software. There's nothing wrong with mixing open- and closed-source > software. Both the open- and closed-source software models are > needed, to optimally serve the market. > > Duh. I would love for my desktop and laptop to have nothing but free software but using Nouveau means that my computers won't wake from sleep without freezing the computer entirely. That and gaming require the proprietary drivers. Luckily for all of us, every GPU manufacturers developers fairly excellent drivers for GNU/Linux. -- Silver Slimer Wikipedia & OpenMedia Supporter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 19:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF918D7F.36D48%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #242668 |
On 5/8/14, 3:09 PM, in article lkgvae$3kv$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
<slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote:
> On 14-05-08 01:46 PM, chrisv wrote:
>> Lloyd E Parsons wrote:
>>
>>>> Ironic how the only
>>>> way Linux sells well on any desktop is to completely give up on Stallman's
>>>> ideals.
>>
>> Nothing "ironic" at all, actually.
>
> People don't realize that RMS is at best an influential figure but by no
> means a leader.
He does have a cult following, though.
> If manufacturers and developers were to abide by every one of his rules, it
> would literally be impossible to make any kind of profit from software.
Right. They would be able to profit from hardware but not software. Push
this idea far enough and you have the quality of not just software going
down but music, books, etc.
> His ideas for hardware design aren't bad though. I also begrudgingly agree
> with his ideas on how to compensate musicians for their work, especially in
> light of the news that musicians tend never to get any kind of compensation at
> all.
Even there he is a loon.
<https://stallman.org/articles/end-war-on-sharing.html>
-----
The term "piracy" is used by record companies to demonize sharing
and cooperation by equating them to kidnaping, murder and theft.
-----
No: they are not equating pirating music with kidnapping and murder! He is
just pushing nonsense. And taking what is not yours is not simply "sharing
and cooperation", it is the *opposite* of cooperation - it is refusing to
cooperate with the rightful owners of what you are taking!
His ideas for funding musicians, from the same page:
-----
Fans of certain kinds of music could organize fan clubs which
would support the people who like that music.
-----
Gee, we could also have fan clubs for doctors and architects and plumbers!
No: this is silly.
-----
We could increase funds for existing government programs that
subsidize musical performance.
-----
How amazing liberal of you to accept this from him. We could do this with
all work - it is called Communism.
-----
Artists can fund expensive works through subscription, with the
funds to be returned if the work is not made.
-----
And how do they return the money they spent as they were making it? And by
subscription? Why not just pay them for the music when you buy a license to
it?
-----
Many musicians get more money from selling fan merchandise than
from their recordings. If they take the plunge into
merchandise-based funding, they have no reason to restrict
copying; quite the contrary.
----
And this should be - and is - a choice they now have. I am fine with that.
But as a choice!
-----
We could support musical artists with public funds distributed
directly to them in proportion to the cube root of their
popularity.
-----
We who? The government? Communism again.
-----
Support artists with voluntary payments.
-----
And do the same with mechanics, teachers, and silver smiths. No! Pay people
what they ask or do not use their services!
-----
...
--
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 22:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <536bfedd$0$45078$862e30e2@ngroups.net> |
| In reply to | #242618 |
chrisv wrote: > Nothing "ironic" at all, actually. I should have noted that Linus himself disagrees with Stallman and the FSF on some significant issues. > Who hasn't noticed that Stallman has rather radical viewpoints, > and that his "all software should be Free" stance is really not viable? Obviously, Stallman's GPLv2 was key to the success of Linux (which is why Linux-hating assholes like "Hadron" attack it). But Linus is much more pragmatic than is Stallman. Linus didn't set-out for Linux to conquer the world. That's just an unintended side-effect. 8) -- 'cola "advocates": software should be free of cost!' - DumFSck, lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 19:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF918E27.36D4B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #242669 |
On 5/8/14, 3:02 PM, in article 536bfedd$0$45078$862e30e2@ngroups.net, "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > chrisv wrote: > >> Nothing "ironic" at all, actually. > > I should have noted that Linus himself disagrees with Stallman and the FSF > on some significant issues. On many issues... Stallman is a whacked out cult leader. >> Who hasn't noticed that Stallman has rather radical viewpoints, >> and that his "all software should be Free" stance is really not viable? > > Obviously, Stallman's GPLv2 was key to the success of Linux (which is why > Linux-hating assholes like "Hadron" attack it). But Linus is much more > pragmatic than is Stallman. Yes, he is. Torvalds and most of the big names in the open source world do not follow the double-talk nonsense of Stallman. > Linus didn't set-out for Linux to conquer the world. That's just an > unintended side-effect. 8) -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 02:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lkhfhh$aue$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #242669 |
On Thu, 08 May 2014 22:02:05 +0000, chrisv wrote: > Obviously, Stallman's GPLv2 was key to the success of Linux (which is > why Linux-hating assholes like "Hadron" attack it). But Linus is much > more pragmatic than is Stallman. Yep. Some of the stuff Stallman says and writes is "out there" as far as I'm concerned, but the main reason for the character assassination by the iCultists and WinDrones is that he found a way to encourage Linux development while simultaneously disallowing any one company to monopolize Gnu/Linux. No one can steal Linux. And that eats away at the obsessive cranks, like Snit and "Lloyd." -- Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 19:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF91901B.36D59%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #242695 |
On 5/8/14, 7:46 PM, in article lkhfhh$aue$6@dont-email.me, "RonB" <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 08 May 2014 22:02:05 +0000, chrisv wrote: > >> Obviously, Stallman's GPLv2 was key to the success of Linux (which is >> why Linux-hating assholes like "Hadron" attack it). But Linus is much >> more pragmatic than is Stallman. > > Yep. Some of the stuff Stallman says and writes is "out there" as far as > I'm concerned, but the main reason for the character assassination by the > iCultists and WinDrones is that he found a way to encourage Linux > development while simultaneously disallowing any one company to monopolize > Gnu/Linux. Again: who cares what your imaginary friends think? Why do you talk about them so much? > No one can steal Linux. And that eats away at the obsessive > cranks, like Snit and "Lloyd." False accusation. Really - just a lie. But you cannot refute him or me so you lie about us. Do not worry, your cult-like herd of convenient friends will never call you out on your lies. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 02:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lkhfbb$aue$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #242618 |
On Thu, 08 May 2014 12:46:38 -0500, chrisv wrote: > Lloyd E Parsons wrote: > >>> Ironic how the only way Linux sells well on any desktop is to >>> completely give up on Stallman's ideals. > > Nothing "ironic" at all, actually. > >>You weren't supposed to notice that! > > Really? Who hasn't noticed that Stallman has rather radical viewpoints, > and that his "all software should be Free" stance is really not viable? > > I've said it before: There's nothing wrong with closed-source software. > There's nothing wrong with mixing open- and closed-source software. > Both the open- and closed-source software models are needed, to > optimally serve the market. > > Duh. Unlike iCultists and WinDrones who seem to thrall to brown-nosing their respective corporate leaders, Linux users often disagree with the "big- wigs" in the Linux community. Deal with the reality of it, "Lloyd." Unlike you, we are not slaves to corporate brands. -- Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 19:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF91905A.36D5A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #242694 |
On 5/8/14, 7:42 PM, in article lkhfbb$aue$5@dont-email.me, "RonB" <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 08 May 2014 12:46:38 -0500, chrisv wrote: > >> Lloyd E Parsons wrote: >> >>>> Ironic how the only way Linux sells well on any desktop is to >>>> completely give up on Stallman's ideals. >> >> Nothing "ironic" at all, actually. >> >>> You weren't supposed to notice that! >> >> Really? Who hasn't noticed that Stallman has rather radical viewpoints, >> and that his "all software should be Free" stance is really not viable? >> >> I've said it before: There's nothing wrong with closed-source software. >> There's nothing wrong with mixing open- and closed-source software. >> Both the open- and closed-source software models are needed, to >> optimally serve the market. >> >> Duh. > > Unlike iCultists and WinDrones who seem to thrall to brown-nosing their > respective corporate leaders, Linux users often disagree with the "big- > wigs" in the Linux community. What is it with you and your imaginary friends? I am fine with you having them - but why do you keep babbling about them in COLA? > Deal with the reality of it, "Lloyd." Unlike you, we are not slaves to > corporate brands. Who is? I mean, really, what the hell are you talking about? -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 11:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF911C93.36CCD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #242599 |
On 5/8/14, 9:51 AM, in article bt1qvuF3kfbU1@mid.individual.net, "Lloyd E Parsons" <lloydp21@live.com> wrote: > On 2014-05-08 16:41:55 +0000, Snit said: > >> On 5/8/14, 9:35 AM, in article 878uqc5iux.fsf@gmail.com, "Hadron" >> <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >>> >>>> On 5/8/14, 9:07 AM, in article lkga38$ck2$5@dont-email.me, "RonB" >>>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> ... you guessed it, the Asus Chromebox. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://snipurl.com/28w2vdi >>>>> >>>>> The more expensive model, with more memory and a faster processor, is at >>>>> #10. >>>>> >>>>> "But they'll never sell." >>>> >>>> Who said they would never sell. I know I have always said they have a >>>> decent >>>> chance - they are inexpensive, focused, and do away with the biggest >>>> problems of desktop Linux. They are a perfect example of why your blaming >>>> of >>>> the boogieman is wrong. >>> >>> I'm surprised they are selling *well* (if indeed they are) because they >>> offer nothing a good cheap laptop can provide especially something like >>> an old thinkpad wiped and installed with Linux. >>> >>> The total lack of choice in what I could run on Chrome I would find very >>> very limiting. I prefer to have choice. Clerly wRonG and turd don't. >> >> Well, they are good for the limited use cases they serve... and for people >> who do not care about privacy or, well, being "Free". Ironic how the only >> way Linux sells well on any desktop is to completely give up on Stallman's >> ideals. > > You weren't supposed to notice that! :) -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Starkey <nobody@ringo.jpunix.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 14:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <e595a561b55ad7c33fc462839ba2aa1a@ringo.jpunix.net> |
| In reply to | #242590 |
"Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote in message news:878uqc5iux.fsf@gmail.com... > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > >> On 5/8/14, 9:07 AM, in article lkga38$ck2$5@dont-email.me, "RonB" >> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> ... you guessed it, the Asus Chromebox. >>> >>> >>> http://snipurl.com/28w2vdi >>> >>> The more expensive model, with more memory and a faster processor, is at >>> #10. >>> >>> "But they'll never sell." >> >> Who said they would never sell. I know I have always said they have a decent >> chance - they are inexpensive, focused, and do away with the biggest >> problems of desktop Linux. They are a perfect example of why your blaming of >> the boogieman is wrong. > > I'm surprised they are selling *well* (if indeed they are) because they > offer nothing a good cheap laptop can provide especially something like > an old thinkpad wiped and installed with Linux. > > The total lack of choice in what I could run on Chrome I would find very > very limiting. I prefer to have choice. Clerly wRonG and turd don't. Because only about 2 dozen Chromebooks are for sale on Amazon, compared to several hundreds of different Windows laptops. It is only natural that the few Chromebook models would cluster at the top. That idiot is comparing the individual sales of a few specific Chromebook models against sales of hundreds of individual Windows models. The idiot then tries to claim that Chromebooks are outselling Windows computers which is complete buckshot. One or two specific Chromebook models are simply more popular than any one specific Windows computer out of the several hundred different models. There are lies, damn lies and statistics. This Chromebook statistic is grossly misleading. > -- > "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, > but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. > Just the opposite, in fact." LOL. Did someone really say this?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 11:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF911C6F.36CCC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #242625 |
On 5/8/14, 11:23 AM, in article e595a561b55ad7c33fc462839ba2aa1a@ringo.jpunix.net, "Richard Starkey" <nobody@ringo.jpunix.net> wrote: ... >> I'm surprised they are selling *well* (if indeed they are) because they >> offer nothing a good cheap laptop can provide especially something like >> an old thinkpad wiped and installed with Linux. >> >> The total lack of choice in what I could run on Chrome I would find very >> very limiting. I prefer to have choice. Clerly wRonG and turd don't. > > Because only about 2 dozen Chromebooks are for sale on Amazon, compared to > several hundreds of different Windows laptops. It is only natural that the > few Chromebook models would cluster at the top. Lower cost and fewer choices. Yes, that means they will show up at the top even with moderate sales compared to other classes. > That idiot is comparing the individual sales of a few specific Chromebook > models against sales of hundreds of individual Windows models. He does not understand the basics of what he is talking about - and often talks about his imaginary friends. It is very odd behavior. > > The idiot then tries to claim that Chromebooks are outselling Windows > computers which is complete buckshot. One or two specific Chromebook models > are simply more popular than any one specific Windows computer out of the > several hundred different models. > > There are lies, damn lies and statistics. This Chromebook statistic is grossly > misleading. Yes... but they still outsell all the "standard" desktop Linux options - assuming there are any even offered on Amazon. Essentially nobody wants them. ... -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 21:12 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87iopgccff.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #242625 |
Richard Starkey <nobody@ringo.jpunix.net> writes: > "Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote in message news:878uqc5iux.fsf@gmail.com... >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >> >>> On 5/8/14, 9:07 AM, in article lkga38$ck2$5@dont-email.me, "RonB" >>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> ... you guessed it, the Asus Chromebox. >>>> >>>> >>>> http://snipurl.com/28w2vdi >>>> >>>> The more expensive model, with more memory and a faster processor, is at >>>> #10. >>>> >>>> "But they'll never sell." >>> >>> Who said they would never sell. I know I have always said they have a decent >>> chance - they are inexpensive, focused, and do away with the biggest >>> problems of desktop Linux. They are a perfect example of why your blaming > of >>> the boogieman is wrong. >> >> I'm surprised they are selling *well* (if indeed they are) because they >> offer nothing a good cheap laptop can provide especially something like >> an old thinkpad wiped and installed with Linux. >> >> The total lack of choice in what I could run on Chrome I would find very >> very limiting. I prefer to have choice. Clerly wRonG and turd don't. > > Because only about 2 dozen Chromebooks are for sale on Amazon, compared to > several hundreds of different Windows laptops. It is only natural that the > few Chromebook models would cluster at the top. > > That idiot is comparing the individual sales of a few specific Chromebook models > against sales of hundreds of individual Windows models. > > The idiot then tries to claim that Chromebooks are outselling Windows computers > which is complete buckshot. One or two specific Chromebook models are simply > more popular than any one specific Windows computer out of the several hundred > different models. > > There are lies, damn lies and statistics. This Chromebook statistic is grossly > misleading. > >> -- >> "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, >> but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. >> Just the opposite, in fact." > > LOL. Did someone really say this? > Yup, turd. Otherwise known as "chrisv". Creepy Chris Ahlstrom, who also knows fuck all about EE, tried to support him. Laughable. -- "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 21 [1] 2 3 … 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web