Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #474813 > unrolled thread
| Started by | maureenshoopie@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-11-02 06:20 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-11-03 10:07 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 166 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus maureenshoopie@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 06:20 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 07:59 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-02 11:42 -0400
Andy Rubin’s ex-wife, Rie Rubin. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-02 09:26 -0700
Re: Andy Rubin’s ex-wife, Rie Rubin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 16:21 -0400
Re: Andy Rubin’s ex-wife, Rie Rubin. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 20:16 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-02 11:45 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 21:17 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 10:08 +0100
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-03 14:42 -0400
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 12:36 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 12:22 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 12:52 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-03 03:30 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-03 14:46 -0400
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-03 13:50 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 14:11 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-03 17:30 -0400
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 15:49 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-03 18:15 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 18:36 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 20:11 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 00:19 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 11:30 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 20:17 +0100
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 12:28 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 11:50 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 11:34 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-04 15:03 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-04 20:16 +0000
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 21:33 +0000
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 19:18 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 23:46 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 21:33 +0000
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 14:42 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 16:08 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 15:28 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 00:17 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 07:26 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 19:08 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 07:22 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 07:06 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 10:08 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 08:14 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:34 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:37 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 11:11 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 10:49 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 09:08 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:20 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 09:27 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 12:14 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 17:32 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 15:41 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 07:03 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 05:20 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 08:06 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 09:11 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:22 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 14:53 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 13:22 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 14:23 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-05 16:07 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 19:35 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-05 17:38 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 21:01 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-05 18:37 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 21:56 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 20:04 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 19:23 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 08:03 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-06 06:30 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 06:53 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 08:08 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 08:19 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 09:45 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-06 12:46 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 10:51 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-06 12:36 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 10:55 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 12:23 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 10:11 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 11:15 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-06 13:45 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 11:59 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 05:53 +0000
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 04:47 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-07 08:53 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-07 06:17 -0800
How many "friends" can you afford ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-07 06:29 -0800
Re: How many "friends" can you afford ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 06:51 -0800
Re: How many "friends" can you afford ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 11:46 -0500
I work a bit, take a rest, then continue. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-09 10:35 -0800
Re: I work a bit, take a rest, then continue. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 22:07 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 11:35 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 10:47 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 11:03 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 12:22 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-07 18:05 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-08 09:02 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 11:36 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 12:36 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-06 11:59 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 12:27 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 14:13 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 16:19 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 14:41 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 12:55 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 13:41 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-06 14:31 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 15:00 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 15:18 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 16:25 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-06 19:31 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 20:38 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 20:59 -0800
Hysterical Women (Democrats) ban "substandard" (affordable) housing. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-06 21:13 -0800
Re: Hysterical Women (Democrats) ban "substandard" (affordable) housing. proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-07 01:13 -0500
Re: Hysterical Women (Democrats) ban "substandard" (affordable) housing. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 23:20 -0800
Re: Hysterical Women (Democrats) ban "substandard" (affordable) housing. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 12:06 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-07 04:45 -0800
We hate the sin not the sinner. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-07 06:18 -0800
Re: We hate the sin not the sinner. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 06:36 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 08:38 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 11:34 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-07 14:47 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 16:19 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 19:08 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 05:29 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 16:50 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 19:07 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-08 03:32 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 03:55 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 07:36 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-08 08:55 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 08:37 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 09:08 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-08 11:10 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 17:33 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 11:38 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-07 07:02 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 08:54 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 11:32 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 04:46 +0000
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 21:05 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 10:46 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 10:04 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 20:00 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 19:07 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 20:05 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:36 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 12:10 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 12:52 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-04 17:53 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 16:10 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 19:23 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 12:20 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 12:36 -0700
Don't work for Google. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-02 08:43 -0700
Re: Don't work for Google. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-02 11:48 -0400
Re: Don't work for Google. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-02 11:00 -0500
Re: Don't work for Google. Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 10:07 +0100
Re: Don't work for Google. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 02:29 -0700
Re: Don't work for Google. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 09:16 -0700
Re: Don't work for Google. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 09:01 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 10:07 +0100
Page 2 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-03 18:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <158109b3-99bc-40df-9e27-09c5b153f3a6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475119 |
On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 6:15:53 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: > On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 5:30:32 PM UTC-4, SilverSlimer wrote: > > On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote: > > > Slimmer wrote: > > >>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, > > >>>> to get what they want. > > >>> > > >>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what? > > >> > > >> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about > > >> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do. > > > > > > Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”. > > > > Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie that > > a woman WON'T tell to get ahead. > > ...HE lied. /S > > > -hh Unlike the intelligent people in here, Flooder Steve Carroll relies on right wing media to build his convictions on subjects. As such, he only thinks of and speaks of the sanctioned stories which also are the ones which portray free thought in a acutely hopeful and brave view. Translation of Flooder Steve Carroll speak: His "problem solving proficiency" side tracked him from a peripheral he insists does not exists that Klaus Schadenfreude found in _seconds_ for this application. Don't get too bigheaded, Flooder Steve Carroll, sometimes "your shills" are just that. If Klaus Schadenfreude has 'file.pdf' open in an application such as emacs and you want to change its name to 'mack.pdf' via a bash script when color-picking with crayons, Klaus Schadenfreude's video might be of value. A persistent, relentless, posting itch, regardless of content - like gunky Mac-using streetwalkers, and well-lubricated sheep, deactivated with wit for his own individual requirements. I've worked for the OEM PC industry for almost 50 years. I've served multibillion corporations making deals with government agencies and the worlds largest companies. Never, not even once, were we ever under a contractual obligation not to pre-install any OS we wanted. We sold AIX, DUnix, HP-UX, and more with Microsoft OSs. -- Get Rich Slow! https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/RSikBcWxBLo Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-03 20:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3d9d1f6a-bb6b-4862-b14f-df6283870a29@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475119 |
On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 6:15:53 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: > On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 5:30:32 PM UTC-4, SilverSlimer wrote: > > On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote: > > > Slimmer wrote: > > >>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, > > >>>> to get what they want. > > >>> > > >>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what? > > >> > > >> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about > > >> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do. > > > > > > Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”. > > > > Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie that > > a woman WON'T tell to get ahead. > > ...HE lied. /S > > > -hh My point of view: Even if somebody was just learning just for fun, the claim that attaining knowledge as being one of having "not anything" to show for it does not work for me because you will have the wisdom to show for it and wisdom is beyond Jeremy. Jeremy gets off on that Klaus Schadenfreude is on the other end. Imagine if Jeremy walked up to a footstool and delivered the punch line. It wouldn't be amusing. Despite Jeremy's claim that he has "no interest in making enemies" (a lie as evidenced by the fact that he destroyed CSMA with his crap) he was quoted asking programmers how they would trick someone to give up their password. -- Get Rich Slow https://youtu.be/BUjnZhKk1Bg http://www.5z8.info/gruesome-gunshot-wounds_t5z0au_cockdock.gif Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 00:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e4e21c11-30bf-4f60-bc24-3d2c8458ba61@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475119 |
On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 6:15:53 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 5:30:32 PM UTC-4, SilverSlimer wrote:
> > On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote:
> > > Slimmer wrote:
> > >>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary,
> > >>>> to get what they want.
> > >>>
> > >>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what?
> > >>
> > >> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about
> > >> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do.
> > >
> > > Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”.
> >
> > Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie that
> > a woman WON'T tell to get ahead.
>
> ...HE lied. /S
>
>
> -hh
Marek admitted Carroll repeatedly asked him to lie:
Marek <NPWdnVgF_NwsozXEnZ2dnUU7-YvNnZ2d@giganews.com>:
-----
When I first tried to broker peace between you [Steve Carroll] and
Snit, you emailed me over and over again asking be to lie about
Glasser.
-----
And then Marek later admitted he DOES lie, but claimed he does it simply because it pleases him to do so:
Marek <keCdnc7hoMqpfy3EnZ2dnUU7-YHNnZ2d@giganews.com>:
-----
| Why do you post your attacks and insults and lies if not to please
| the herd?
I do it to please me, Snit.
-----
Whatever his reason for lying, even Marek admits he lies and attacks and insults.
--
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened
http://www.5z8.info/-php-deactivate_phishing_filter-48-_e3m8dt_malicious-cookie
http://bit.ly/2oNYRgv
Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 11:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g48s6kFc663U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475119 |
On 11/3/18 6:15 PM, -hh wrote: > On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 5:30:32 PM UTC-4, SilverSlimer wrote: >> On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote: >>> Slimmer wrote: >>>>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, >>>>>> to get what they want. >>>>> >>>>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what? >>>> >>>> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about >>>> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do. >>> >>> Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”. >> >> Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie that >> a woman WON'T tell to get ahead. > > ...HE lied. /S What evidence do you have he lied? Well, other than what is discussed here: <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 20:17 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <87h8gwirel.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #475208 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > On 11/3/18 6:15 PM, -hh wrote: >> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 5:30:32 PM UTC-4, SilverSlimer wrote: >>> On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote: >>>> Slimmer wrote: >>>>>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, >>>>>>> to get what they want. >>>>>> >>>>>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what? >>>>> >>>>> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about >>>>> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do. >>>> >>>> Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”. >>> >>> Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie that >>> a woman WON'T tell to get ahead. >> >> ...HE lied. /S > > What evidence do you have he lied? > > Well, other than what is discussed here: > > <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> Kavanaugh didn't lie. The women lied. Take it to the bank. -- chrisv alias turdv is a turd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 12:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g48vjkFcv4gU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475225 |
On 11/4/18 12:17 PM, Hadron Quark wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > >> On 11/3/18 6:15 PM, -hh wrote: >>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 5:30:32 PM UTC-4, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>> On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote: >>>>> Slimmer wrote: >>>>>>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, >>>>>>>> to get what they want. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what? >>>>>> >>>>>> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about >>>>>> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do. >>>>> >>>>> Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”. >>>> >>>> Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie that >>>> a woman WON'T tell to get ahead. >>> >>> ...HE lied. /S >> >> What evidence do you have he lied? >> >> Well, other than what is discussed here: >> >> <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> > > Kavanaugh didn't lie. The women lied. Take it to the bank. I would love to see your support of this. With evidence... like the link I showed gives evidence. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 11:50 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <3a148092-d255-4eb7-91b0-fa05cd4a319c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475227 |
On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 12:28:56 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 11/4/18 12:17 PM, Hadron Quark wrote: > > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > > > >> On 11/3/18 6:15 PM, -hh wrote: > >>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 5:30:32 PM UTC-4, SilverSlimer wrote: > >>>> On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote: > >>>>> Slimmer wrote: > >>>>>>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, > >>>>>>>> to get what they want. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about > >>>>>> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do. > >>>>> > >>>>> Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”. > >>>> > >>>> Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie that > >>>> a woman WON'T tell to get ahead. > >>> > >>> ...HE lied. /S > >> > >> What evidence do you have he lied? > >> > >> Well, other than what is discussed here: > >> > >> <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> > > > > Kavanaugh didn't lie. The women lied. Take it to the bank. > > I would love to see your support of this. With evidence... like the link > I showed gives evidence. > > > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Gee, no on saw more forgeries coming. LOL! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.28 Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWJpfjAAoJEC03b6bOr/+drC0P/RZBxcLK8eFZ7QUKjlqJRqfj 66udasAYnovhi+C1bpBxXZIm8Xxg2+JDdVoMfw/d+5R8+KpEXpxK+4y9GB8NuBBz 98+LuNNIus0cXJ6goCyKZj5FUajHYIhgoEAb+O8F0pYMcqv08R39IddgVEQCasDZ 9QPXlQco0QOSD49BArlDa7qgwi17Rs2zkYnw27jEIVEuYlfhqj2T7Mcirwby4JD3 +1Geq5kCdeCtMG+z6gAdth0akrSMlYLAnixbYolEFm6wtg7DW2BrwVo7NTY8Zuy1 UjRrn8JAoHrCec82HulrBBEXC/dhti2SIszDnt1GnZSTB33p1plQgklUmmqN8Qvu To/TAz07YWAeUHcYSyHzmJuVbL0r9emcQD/AfB8CxAhh+p5F5kc2hfwAOmJ4cGpV +kIqUp7N1UXqSOXnFyxYz4HJv9/c0UPNXSY2QDPmaWd7AFrB80BcOw2yVS30jQwo QhBtvoj2t/FJi/G7KnIpGYl3ZFy7QxtNL6PnPW5y46EjzDbNEnMbETTxAzI24QGw x5xgyhdiyRnpCvyHFd21d09bYOrBHH6qe3NMVTRBPjh1MUaw1E8WhQo916Zvk4jz pD23EIt9uk79a2aD+EbC/vZHLPGTqlbI1bmYV5KlzJusIO2i939Cs/AhYcdM8mEQ WqdC0S1YIC7GfYk7riFe =F3OP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Puppy Videos https://youtu.be/48_DdtLGR9s Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 11:34 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4210b387-5367-4f1b-b70b-f30378ba57f3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475225 |
On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 12:17:24 PM UTC-7, Hadron Quark wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > > > On 11/3/18 6:15 PM, -hh wrote: > >> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 5:30:32 PM UTC-4, SilverSlimer wrote: > >>> On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote: > >>>> Slimmer wrote: > >>>>>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, > >>>>>>> to get what they want. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what? > >>>>> > >>>>> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about > >>>>> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do. > >>>> > >>>> Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”. > >>> > >>> Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie that > >>> a woman WON'T tell to get ahead. > >> > >> ...HE lied. /S > > > > What evidence do you have he lied? > > > > Well, other than what is discussed here: > > > > <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> > > Kavanaugh didn't lie. The women lied. Take it to the bank. > > -- > chrisv alias turdv is a turd Too much glue for you, Gluey. Steven Carroll will be destroyed once the druggies overindulge. That, and there will repeatedly be a mentally unstable element or two in an unmoderated news group. The specifics of the bullshit aside, we've all seen who frequently lashes out when he doesn't get his way. My view: Even if you were merely stealing classes from colleges, the claim that attaining know-how as being one of having "zilch" to show for it doesn't work for me because you'll obviously have the knowledge to show for it and know-how is something you can show off. Klaus 'The Moron' Schadenfreude is commonly seen declaring "THERE IS NO" when it comes to text on a website where info is there multiple times... but Klaus 'The Moron' Schadenfreude is just too dull-witted or lazy to recognize any information he reads. Translation of Klaus 'The Moron' Schadenfreude speak: His "troubleshooting mastery" made it so he could not find a module he insists does not exists that does exist on this application. -- My Snoring Solution https://youtu.be/D_so1dvjeyI Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 15:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <XfIDD.600756$cL2.468686@fx43.iad> |
| In reply to | #475225 |
On 2018-11-04 2:17 p.m., Hadron Quark wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > >> On 11/3/18 6:15 PM, -hh wrote: >>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 5:30:32 PM UTC-4, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>> On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote: >>>>> Slimmer wrote: >>>>>>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, >>>>>>>> to get what they want. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what? >>>>>> >>>>>> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about >>>>>> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do. >>>>> >>>>> Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”. >>>> >>>> Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie that >>>> a woman WON'T tell to get ahead. >>> >>> ...HE lied. /S >> >> What evidence do you have he lied? >> >> Well, other than what is discussed here: >> >> <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> > > Kavanaugh didn't lie. The women lied. Take it to the bank. It has since been revealed that one of the Kavanaugh accusers ADMITTED to have lied and Snit, the resident moron, is still trying to get us to believe that Kavanaugh is guilty. -- SilverSlimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 20:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prnk36$3pn$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #475232 |
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 15:03:04 -0500, SilverSlimer, tweeted: > On 2018-11-04 2:17 p.m., Hadron Quark wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >> >>> On 11/3/18 6:15 PM, -hh wrote: >>>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 5:30:32 PM UTC-4, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>> On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote: >>>>>> Slimmer wrote: >>>>>>>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, >>>>>>>>> to get what they want. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about >>>>>>> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do. >>>>>> >>>>>> Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”. >>>>> >>>>> Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie that >>>>> a woman WON'T tell to get ahead. >>>> >>>> ...HE lied. /S >>> >>> What evidence do you have he lied? >>> >>> Well, other than what is discussed here: >>> >>> <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> >> >> Kavanaugh didn't lie. The women lied. Take it to the bank. > > It has since been revealed that one of the Kavanaugh accusers ADMITTED > to have lied and Snit, the resident moron, is still trying to get us to > believe that Kavanaugh is guilty. All the Kavanaugh accusers either lied or are suffering from fake memories. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/nov/3/another-kavanaugh-accuser-admits-fabricating-rape-/ Liberals are losing their minds over Trump :) -- Do not write below this line ____________________________
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 21:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prnoju$67e$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #475236 |
On 2018-11-04, Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 15:03:04 -0500, SilverSlimer, tweeted: >> On 2018-11-04 2:17 p.m., Hadron Quark wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >>> >>>> On 11/3/18 6:15 PM, -hh wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 5:30:32 PM UTC-4, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote: >>>>>>> Slimmer wrote: >>>>>>>>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, >>>>>>>>>> to get what they want. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about >>>>>>>> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”. >>>>>> >>>>>> Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie that >>>>>> a woman WON'T tell to get ahead. >>>>> >>>>> ...HE lied. /S >>>> >>>> What evidence do you have he lied? >>>> >>>> Well, other than what is discussed here: >>>> >>>> <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> >>> >>> Kavanaugh didn't lie. The women lied. Take it to the bank. >> >> It has since been revealed that one of the Kavanaugh accusers ADMITTED >> to have lied and Snit, the resident moron, is still trying to get us to >> believe that Kavanaugh is guilty. > > All the Kavanaugh accusers either lied or are suffering from fake memories. > > https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/nov/3/another-kavanaugh-accuser-admits-fabricating-rape-/ > > Liberals are losing their minds over Trump :) Something that small is pretty easy to lose. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 19:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g49njgFhusoU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475236 |
On 11/4/18 1:16 PM, Spooge wrote: > On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 15:03:04 -0500, SilverSlimer, tweeted: >> On 2018-11-04 2:17 p.m., Hadron Quark wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >>> >>>> On 11/3/18 6:15 PM, -hh wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 5:30:32 PM UTC-4, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote: >>>>>>> Slimmer wrote: >>>>>>>>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, >>>>>>>>>> to get what they want. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about >>>>>>>> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”. >>>>>> >>>>>> Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie that >>>>>> a woman WON'T tell to get ahead. >>>>> >>>>> ...HE lied. /S >>>> >>>> What evidence do you have he lied? >>>> >>>> Well, other than what is discussed here: >>>> >>>> <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> >>> >>> Kavanaugh didn't lie. The women lied. Take it to the bank. >> >> It has since been revealed that one of the Kavanaugh accusers ADMITTED >> to have lied and Snit, the resident moron, is still trying to get us to >> believe that Kavanaugh is guilty. > > All the Kavanaugh accusers either lied or are suffering from fake memories. > > https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/nov/3/another-kavanaugh-accuser-admits-fabricating-rape-/ > > Liberals are losing their minds over Trump :) > Neither "Ms. Munro-Leighton" nor "Jane Doe" are even mentioned in the evidence I showed against Kavanaugh. <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> This suggests even you know you have no counter. Fair enough. The fact others may have lied about Kavanaugh is not relevant (though if they were to try to become SCOTUS justices I would not back them either). -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 23:46 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <48f43dab-cbb4-4148-a19e-10d737d6f4a0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475280 |
On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:18:27 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 11/4/18 1:16 PM, Spooge wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 15:03:04 -0500, SilverSlimer, tweeted: > >> On 2018-11-04 2:17 p.m., Hadron Quark wrote: > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > >>> > >>>> On 11/3/18 6:15 PM, -hh wrote: > >>>>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 5:30:32 PM UTC-4, SilverSlimer wrote: > >>>>>> On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote: > >>>>>>> Slimmer wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, > >>>>>>>>>> to get what they want. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about > >>>>>>>> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie that > >>>>>> a woman WON'T tell to get ahead. > >>>>> > >>>>> ...HE lied. /S > >>>> > >>>> What evidence do you have he lied? > >>>> > >>>> Well, other than what is discussed here: > >>>> > >>>> <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> > >>> > >>> Kavanaugh didn't lie. The women lied. Take it to the bank. > >> > >> It has since been revealed that one of the Kavanaugh accusers ADMITTED > >> to have lied and Snit, the resident moron, is still trying to get us to > >> believe that Kavanaugh is guilty. > > > > All the Kavanaugh accusers either lied or are suffering from fake memories. > > > > https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/nov/3/another-kavanaugh-accuser-admits-fabricating-rape-/ > > > > Liberals are losing their minds over Trump :) > > > Neither "Ms. Munro-Leighton" nor "Jane Doe" are even mentioned in the > evidence I showed against Kavanaugh. > > <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> > > This suggests even you know you have no counter. Fair enough. > > The fact others may have lied about Kavanaugh is not relevant (though if > they were to try to become SCOTUS justices I would not back them either). > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> Asking Klaus Schadenfreude to stop trolling, as fruitless as it is, is different than showing his trolling. My main idea was that good people stay here *to* face idiots. It is not like honest people do not quickly figure out what this group is, Steve Carroll especially. Linus Torvalds is a false advocate's only reason for living. It's a prolonged story, and Klaus Schadenfreude is simultaneously unable to stop his trolling remarks, while posting with nyms that speak just like him. -- Do not click this link! http://www.5z8.info/freeanimalporn.com-start-download_s9j7do_dogporn Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 21:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prnoid$67e$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #475232 |
On 2018-11-04, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > On 2018-11-04 2:17 p.m., Hadron Quark wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >> >>> On 11/3/18 6:15 PM, -hh wrote: >>>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 5:30:32 PM UTC-4, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>> On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote: >>>>>> Slimmer wrote: >>>>>>>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, >>>>>>>>> to get what they want. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about >>>>>>> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do. >>>>>> >>>>>> Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”. >>>>> >>>>> Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie that >>>>> a woman WON'T tell to get ahead. >>>> >>>> ...HE lied. /S >>> >>> What evidence do you have he lied? The voice in "Snit's" tiny little head that tells him to repeat everything he hears, told him "HE lied." The fact that Kavanaugh who has a lifetime record of treating women respectfully (unlike, say, Clinton) doesn't even register with the tiny little idiot voice in his tiny little idiot brain. >>> Well, other than what is discussed here: >>> >>> <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> >> >> Kavanaugh didn't lie. The women lied. Take it to the bank. > > It has since been revealed that one of the Kavanaugh accusers ADMITTED > to have lied and Snit, the resident moron, is still trying to get us to > believe that Kavanaugh is guilty. > -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 14:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <cf252151-e378-4edb-b964-dee20d2e0571@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475244 |
On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 2:33:03 PM UTC-7, RonB wrote: > On 2018-11-04, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > > On 2018-11-04 2:17 p.m., Hadron Quark wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > >> > >>> On 11/3/18 6:15 PM, -hh wrote: > >>>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 5:30:32 PM UTC-4, SilverSlimer wrote: > >>>>> On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote: > >>>>>> Slimmer wrote: > >>>>>>>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, > >>>>>>>>> to get what they want. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about > >>>>>>> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”. > >>>>> > >>>>> Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie that > >>>>> a woman WON'T tell to get ahead. > >>>> > >>>> ...HE lied. /S > >>> > >>> What evidence do you have he lied? > > The voice in "Snit's" tiny little head that tells him to repeat everything > he hears, told him "HE lied." The fact that Kavanaugh who has a lifetime > record of treating women respectfully (unlike, say, Clinton) doesn't even > register with the tiny little idiot voice in his tiny little idiot brain. > > >>> Well, other than what is discussed here: > >>> > >>> <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> > >> > >> Kavanaugh didn't lie. The women lied. Take it to the bank. > > > > It has since been revealed that one of the Kavanaugh accusers ADMITTED > > to have lied and Snit, the resident moron, is still trying to get us to > > believe that Kavanaugh is guilty. > > > > > -- > The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux. I'd help Klaus Schadenfreude directly but he's an imbecile who twists what you say to achieve his yearning to call everyone a sock. LXDE is definitely my second favorite DE and the only one I suggest to computer users. Primary interface is GNOME, though. A great search feature is all you want after Klaus Schadenfreude messes things up. Just about everything Klaus Schadenfreude says about anyone is dishonest as everyone knows. Klaus Schadenfreude is four seconds away from being in Jeff Relf's kill filter. Everyone is Klaus Schadenfreude -- the oldest gag in the book. From what I've seen it looks like the LXQt ecosystem needs more and more resources. -- Puppy Videos! https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.sys.mac.system/6m_7Z7rQ6Hg http://www.5z8.info/killallimmigrants_j6f7mm_gruesome-gunshot-wounds http://www.5z8.info/trojan_p4g1zy_how-to-skin-a-gerbil Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 16:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g49cf5FfmuoU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475244 |
On 11/4/18 2:33 PM, RonB wrote: > On 2018-11-04, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: >> On 2018-11-04 2:17 p.m., Hadron Quark wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >>> >>>> On 11/3/18 6:15 PM, -hh wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 5:30:32 PM UTC-4, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote: >>>>>>> Slimmer wrote: >>>>>>>>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, >>>>>>>>>> to get what they want. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about >>>>>>>> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”. >>>>>> >>>>>> Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie that >>>>>> a woman WON'T tell to get ahead. >>>>> >>>>> ...HE lied. /S >>>> >>>> What evidence do you have he lied? > > The voice in "Snit's" tiny little head that tells him to repeat everything > he hears, told him "HE lied." The fact that Kavanaugh who has a lifetime > record of treating women respectfully (unlike, say, Clinton) doesn't even > register with the tiny little idiot voice in his tiny little idiot brain. See: this is you just lashing out with insecurity. You are not refuting anything I said. Not even trying. You just howl. Notice below I give evidence of why he is likely lying. >>>> Well, other than what is discussed here: >>>> >>>> <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> >>> >>> Kavanaugh didn't lie. The women lied. Take it to the bank. >> >> It has since been revealed that one of the Kavanaugh accusers ADMITTED >> to have lied and Snit, the resident moron, is still trying to get us to >> believe that Kavanaugh is guilty. >> > > -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 15:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <88c638cc-b0d9-4ef9-a4c0-7547b57d1528@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475263 |
On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 4:08:24 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 11/4/18 2:33 PM, RonB wrote: > > On 2018-11-04, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > >> On 2018-11-04 2:17 p.m., Hadron Quark wrote: > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > >>> > >>>> On 11/3/18 6:15 PM, -hh wrote: > >>>>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 5:30:32 PM UTC-4, SilverSlimer wrote: > >>>>>> On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote: > >>>>>>> Slimmer wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, > >>>>>>>>>> to get what they want. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about > >>>>>>>> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie that > >>>>>> a woman WON'T tell to get ahead. > >>>>> > >>>>> ...HE lied. /S > >>>> > >>>> What evidence do you have he lied? > > > > The voice in "Snit's" tiny little head that tells him to repeat everything > > he hears, told him "HE lied." The fact that Kavanaugh who has a lifetime > > record of treating women respectfully (unlike, say, Clinton) doesn't even > > register with the tiny little idiot voice in his tiny little idiot brain. > > See: this is you just lashing out with insecurity. You are not refuting > anything I said. Not even trying. You just howl. Notice below I give > evidence of why he is likely lying. > > >>>> Well, other than what is discussed here: > >>>> > >>>> <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> > >>> > >>> Kavanaugh didn't lie. The women lied. Take it to the bank. > >> > >> It has since been revealed that one of the Kavanaugh accusers ADMITTED > >> to have lied and Snit, the resident moron, is still trying to get us to > >> believe that Kavanaugh is guilty. > >> > > > > > > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> Who are you even speaking to? That is the problem now and younger students don't understand why older people are better; people from past generations should know better than to fall for communism. I'm well aware the junk I link to from YouTube is complete beginner level. That said, it is good enough. These posts are clearly not automated, they are made by Jonas Eklundh Communication AB who is a glue sniffing loser with a personal vendetta who has way too much time on his hands. All that he cares about is that Jonas Eklundh Communication AB gets to impart his robocall and then hang up and giggle about it. The fact that Desk Rabbit is an innocent patsy on the other end of the phone is the game. Does Desk Rabbit believe the lies Jonas Eklundh Communication AB is spewing? If Desk Rabbit has 'b.txt' open in an application such as LibreOffice Writer and Jonas Eklundh Communication AB wants to change its name to 'windows.txt' via a bash script, that might be useful, if only to see it attach to a VPN display. -- Do not click this link!! https://youtu.be/m37dF5X2S-4 Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 00:17 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <755a9933-1772-49ff-85d6-3116072175f8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475267 |
On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 4:29:01 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 4:08:24 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > > On 11/4/18 2:33 PM, RonB wrote: > > > On 2018-11-04, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > > >> On 2018-11-04 2:17 p.m., Hadron Quark wrote: > > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > > >>> > > >>>> On 11/3/18 6:15 PM, -hh wrote: > > >>>>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 5:30:32 PM UTC-4, SilverSlimer wrote: > > >>>>>> On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote: > > >>>>>>> Slimmer wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, > > >>>>>>>>>> to get what they want. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this misogyny is ... what? > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about > > >>>>>>>> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie that > > >>>>>> a woman WON'T tell to get ahead. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> ...HE lied. /S > > >>>> > > >>>> What evidence do you have he lied? > > > > > > The voice in "Snit's" tiny little head that tells him to repeat everything > > > he hears, told him "HE lied." The fact that Kavanaugh who has a lifetime > > > record of treating women respectfully (unlike, say, Clinton) doesn't even > > > register with the tiny little idiot voice in his tiny little idiot brain. > > > > See: this is you just lashing out with insecurity. You are not refuting > > anything I said. Not even trying. You just howl. Notice below I give > > evidence of why he is likely lying. > > > > >>>> Well, other than what is discussed here: > > >>>> > > >>>> <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> > > >>> > > >>> Kavanaugh didn't lie. The women lied. Take it to the bank. > > >> > > >> It has since been revealed that one of the Kavanaugh accusers ADMITTED > > >> to have lied and Snit, the resident moron, is still trying to get us to > > >> believe that Kavanaugh is guilty. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> > > > > Who are you even speaking to? That is the problem now and younger students don't understand why older people are better; people from past generations should know better than to fall for communism. I'm well aware the junk I link to from YouTube is complete beginner level. That said, it is good enough. > > These posts are clearly not automated, they are made by Jonas Eklundh Communication AB who is a glue sniffing loser with a personal vendetta who has way too much time on his hands. All that he cares about is that Jonas Eklundh Communication AB gets to impart his robocall and then hang up and giggle about it. The fact that Desk Rabbit is an innocent patsy on the other end of the phone is the game. > > Does Desk Rabbit believe the lies Jonas Eklundh Communication AB is spewing? If Desk Rabbit has 'b.txt' open in an application such as LibreOffice Writer and Jonas Eklundh Communication AB wants to change its name to 'windows.txt' via a bash script, that might be useful, if only to see it attach to a VPN display. > > -- > Do not click this link!! > https://youtu.be/m37dF5X2S-4 > Jonas Eklundh Communication AB It's trivial to distort the truth by focusing on a small number of isolated examples different from what is something more common like C++. What holds more weight from an advocacy vantage point are the regular circumstances. I am working on code which will be more than anything Klaus Schadenfreude can do! Just look at your attempts and look at Snit's, there is nothing for Snit to learn from a fool like Klaus Schadenfreude. But hey, let him keep making a cretin of himself. It is not like anyone believes him. -- I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened!! http://alt.conspiracy.narkive.com/QcWYJ4Px/the-mentally-ill-mark-s-bilk http://comp.os.linux.advocacy.narkive.com/711dskzA/steven-petruzzellis-admits-he-can-not-back-his-claims-about-snit http://www.5z8.info/php-start_GPS_tracking-user_j3m3lg_whitepower Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 07:26 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <31h0udpm1egjk3v2t280evgl3t68fr8jun@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #475244 |
RonB wrote: >The fact that Kavanaugh who has a lifetime >record of treating women respectfully (unlike, say, Clinton) doesn't even >register with the tiny little idiot voice in his tiny little idiot brain. Well, if it did happen, it very likely could have been in isolated incident, perpetrated by a drunken young person. It doesn't necessarily make him a bad person. -- "you're an idiot if you think a Linux based OS is as easy to setup and configure as a Mac." - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 19:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g49n0uFhreaU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475232 |
On 11/4/18 1:03 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On 2018-11-04 2:17 p.m., Hadron Quark wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >> >>> On 11/3/18 6:15 PM, -hh wrote: >>>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 5:30:32 PM UTC-4, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>> On 2018-11-03 4:50 p.m., -hh wrote: >>>>>> Slimmer wrote: >>>>>>>>> History has shown that women will lie, repeatedly if necessary, >>>>>>>>> to get what they want. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And men will lie even more vehemently, so the point here of this >>>>>>>> misogyny is ... what? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Telling the truth is not misogyny. Let me know when men lie about >>>>>>> sexually harrassed to the same degree as women do. >>>>>> >>>>>> Your statement was “lie”, not “lie about sexual harassment”. >>>>> >>>>> Most of the time it's sexual harrassment. However, there is no lie >>>>> that >>>>> a woman WON'T tell to get ahead. >>>> >>>> ...HE lied. /S >>> >>> What evidence do you have he lied? >>> >>> Well, other than what is discussed here: >>> >>> <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> >> >> Kavanaugh didn't lie. The women lied. Take it to the bank. > > It has since been revealed that one of the Kavanaugh accusers ADMITTED > to have lied By all means show support. I will listen. > and Snit, the resident moron, is still trying to get us to > believe that Kavanaugh is guilty. I am noting the evidence suggests he is. Even if he is not, though, during the hearings he proved he was not capable. And his first decision showed it very well -- he (and others) decided that many Native Americans should have extra hurdles to vote and it might even be illegal for them to. There is no way that is a reasonable position. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web