Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #242585 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-05-08 16:18 +0000 |
| Last post | 2014-05-09 09:51 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 72 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 16:18 +0000
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 18:44 +0200
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:41 -0700
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-08 11:45 -0500
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2014-05-08 19:33 +0100
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 11:47 -0700
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-08 14:44 -0500
Windows, the OS that hides that it is VMS Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-08 16:42 -0400
Re: Windows, the OS that hides that it is VMS Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 22:45 +0200
Re: Windows, the OS that hides that it is VMS Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 13:49 -0700
Re: Windows, the OS that hides that it is VMS Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 13:46 -0700
Re: Windows, the OS that hides that it is VMS RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 02:26 +0000
Re: Windows, the OS that hides that it is VMS Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-09 02:38 +0000
Re: Windows, the OS that hides that it is VMS Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-09 05:52 -0400
Re: Windows, the OS that hides that it is VMS flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 07:37 -0400
Re: Windows, the OS that hides that it is VMS chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 06:56 -0500
Re: Windows, the OS that hides that it is VMS Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:39 -0700
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-05-08 23:25 +0200
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2014-05-08 23:20 +0100
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-08 19:53 -0400
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 07:34 -0400
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 09:18 -0400
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 02:39 +0000
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 19:50 -0700
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-08 14:46 -0500
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 02:21 +0000
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 02:24 +0000
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-08 23:20 -0400
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 10:35 +0200
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-09 11:08 +0200
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 09:38 +0000
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 06:51 -0500
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 14:19 +0200
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 08:59 -0400
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 13:34 +0200
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 08:58 -0400
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-09 08:03 -0500
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 08:45 -0500
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 10:09 -0400
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-09 06:49 -0500
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 13:52 +0200
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 09:30 -0400
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 15:33 +0200
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 07:55 -0400
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-09 08:17 -0700
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 10:51 -0700
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 07:24 -0500
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-09 13:33 +0100
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-09 10:06 -0400
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-09 09:21 -0500
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-09 09:46 -0500
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 09:28 -0400
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-09 09:09 -0400
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2014-05-09 15:20 +0100
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 10:40 -0400
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2014-05-16 11:50 +0100
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2014-05-16 11:52 +0100
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 12:59 -0400
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-16 07:31 -0400
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-16 06:46 -0500
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 12:59 -0400
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2014-05-16 18:15 +0100
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-16 12:39 -0500
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-16 16:44 -0400
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 13:01 -0400
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2014-05-16 18:46 +0100
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-16 13:10 -0500
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-16 16:46 -0400
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 16:53 -0400
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-09 04:38 -0700
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 13:40 +0200
Re: An Android All-In-One @ #9 in Desktops? Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-09 09:51 -0400
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 07:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1qhp8ysy2mgni$.1wjnia1oyo778$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #242677 |
On Thu, 8 May 2014 19:53:45 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Lusotec wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> Lloyd E Parsons wrote: >>> But for all of that if you were to tell the vast majority of Android >>> users that they are using Linux, you'd get a questioning look and then >>> "what's Linux"! :) >> >> But for all of that if you were to tell the vast majority of Windows >> users that they are using NT kernel, you'd get a questioning look and then >> "what's NT kernel"! :) >> >> But for all of that if you were to tell the vast majority of iOS >> users that they are using XNU, you'd get a questioning look and then >> "what's iOS" and "what's XNU"! :) >> >> For how long will the anti-Linux horde continue to use these idiotic >> arguments? >> >> Get some new material, seriously! > > Lloyd is the Henny Youngman of COLA. Take my Linux! Please!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 09:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lkikj5$dqi$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #242719 |
On 5/9/2014 7:34 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: > On Thu, 8 May 2014 19:53:45 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > >> Lusotec wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> Lloyd E Parsons wrote: >>>> But for all of that if you were to tell the vast majority of Android >>>> users that they are using Linux, you'd get a questioning look and then >>>> "what's Linux"! :) >>> >>> But for all of that if you were to tell the vast majority of Windows >>> users that they are using NT kernel, you'd get a questioning look and then >>> "what's NT kernel"! :) >>> >>> But for all of that if you were to tell the vast majority of iOS >>> users that they are using XNU, you'd get a questioning look and then >>> "what's iOS" and "what's XNU"! :) >>> >>> For how long will the anti-Linux horde continue to use these idiotic >>> arguments? >>> >>> Get some new material, seriously! >> >> Lloyd is the Henny Youngman of COLA. > > Take my Linux! > Please! ha! Good one!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 02:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lkhf5k$aue$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #242672 |
On Thu, 08 May 2014 23:20:20 +0100, Lusotec wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Lloyd E Parsons wrote: >> But for all of that if you were to tell the vast majority of Android >> users that they are using Linux, you'd get a questioning look and then >> "what's Linux"! :) > > But for all of that if you were to tell the vast majority of Windows > users that they are using NT kernel, you'd get a questioning look and > then "what's NT kernel"! :) > > But for all of that if you were to tell the vast majority of iOS users > that they are using XNU, you'd get a questioning look and then "what's > iOS" and "what's XNU"! :) > > For how long will the anti-Linux horde continue to use these idiotic > arguments? > > Get some new material, seriously! It simply doesn't matter. These WinDrones and iCultists can't get past "branding" and all the greed it implies. They can't imagine Linux existing without being a corporate "brand." Yeah, Linux is community developed. It's free, people can use without paying for it -- and all that money you think someone should be getting for the Linux "brand," for all those Linux boxes just doesn't exist. Linux makes corporations money -- lots of it, but the Linux "brand" doesn't. Android (Linux) exists. Chrome OS (Linux) exists. Red Hat (Linux) exists. CentOS (Linux) exists. Linux Mint (Linux) exists. Ubuntu (Linux) exists. Kindles (Linux) exist. Nooks (Linux) exist. Thousands and thousands of embedded devices using Linux exist. But the "brand" Linux is virtually non-existent. And no one who actually uses Linux gives a rat's ass about the Linux "brand." Branding is of utmost importance to money grubbers, not Linux users. When WinDrones and iCultists figure out this simple point, they'll come a long way to understanding why we find their empty arguments a waste of time. We speak two different languages. Go back to your Mac and Windows brands, brag about being reamed by the corporations who foist their expensive hobbyware on you -- we don't care. The question is, why are obsessed with Linux, "Lloyd?" -- Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 19:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF91909D.36D5B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #242692 |
On 5/8/14, 7:39 PM, in article lkhf5k$aue$4@dont-email.me, "RonB" <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 08 May 2014 23:20:20 +0100, Lusotec wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Lloyd E Parsons wrote: >>> But for all of that if you were to tell the vast majority of Android >>> users that they are using Linux, you'd get a questioning look and then >>> "what's Linux"! :) >> >> But for all of that if you were to tell the vast majority of Windows >> users that they are using NT kernel, you'd get a questioning look and >> then "what's NT kernel"! :) >> >> But for all of that if you were to tell the vast majority of iOS users >> that they are using XNU, you'd get a questioning look and then "what's >> iOS" and "what's XNU"! :) >> >> For how long will the anti-Linux horde continue to use these idiotic >> arguments? >> >> Get some new material, seriously! > > It simply doesn't matter. These WinDrones and iCultists can't get past > "branding" and all the greed it implies. Who cares what your imaginary friends do or what they think? They are *imaginary*! Deal with it! > They can't imagine Linux existing without being a corporate "brand." Yeah, > Linux is community developed. It's free, people can use without paying for it > -- and all that money you think someone should be getting for the Linux > "brand," for all those Linux boxes just doesn't exist. Linux makes > corporations money -- lots of it, but the Linux "brand" doesn't. Android > (Linux) exists. Chrome OS (Linux) exists. Red Hat (Linux) exists. CentOS > (Linux) exists. Linux Mint (Linux) exists. Ubuntu (Linux) exists. Kindles > (Linux) exist. Nooks (Linux) exist. Thousands and thousands of embedded > devices using Linux exist. But the "brand" Linux is virtually non-existent. > And no one who actually uses Linux gives a rat's ass about the Linux "brand." > Branding is of utmost importance to money grubbers, not Linux users. When > WinDrones and iCultists figure out this simple point, they'll come a long way > to understanding why we find their empty arguments a waste of time. We speak > two different languages. > > Go back to your Mac and Windows brands, brag about being reamed by the > corporations who foist their expensive hobbyware on you -- we don't care. The > question is, why are obsessed with Linux, "Lloyd?" Why are you obsessing over your imaginary friends and what they say... and then babbling about it in public? -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 14:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vfmnm9l5j46u5tik24auvjnheuchna1vdq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #242626 |
Lusotec wrote: > Lloyd E Parsons wrote: >> >> they could have just as well picked any other *nix kernel. > >Yes, they could. Google had choices, but chose Linux, and 'Rhoid thinks that reflects poorly upon Linux? He's stupidier than I thought! 'Rhoid is right "up there" with the DumbFSck, who must think that people have decided that McDonald's makes the "best hamburger". -- 'You (the lame Linux "community") have always decided on one "best distro".' - DumFSck, lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 02:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lkhe33$aue$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #242626 |
On Thu, 08 May 2014 19:33:56 +0100, Lusotec wrote: >> And considering that all Android uses is a heavily modified kernel, > > Android *never* used a "heavily modified [Linux] kernel" and today > Android runs on a main line Linux. Don't let the facts get in the way of your FUD, "Lloyd." Or is it possible you REALLY are this clueless? (Don't answer, I don't care one way or the other.) -- Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 02:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lkhe8b$aue$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #242626 |
On Thu, 08 May 2014 19:33:56 +0100, Lusotec wrote: >> they could have just as well picked any other *nix kernel. > > Yes, they could. They could have chosen a kernel like on of the BSDs > that even has a less restrictive license. Google is not much of a fan of > GPL so a BSD license would have been a big plus. Yet, they choose Linux > and that really bothers the anti-Linux horde. Yeah, they could have picked BSD -- but the Linux kernel is vastly more popular with many more thousands of developers worldwide. Perhaps you can go to Google and explain to them how they could have possibly been even more successful, "Lloyd." :) Meanwhile, I think Google seems to doing "okay" with Linux, don't you? -- Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 23:20 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lkhhhh$55v$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #242626 |
On 5/8/2014 2:33 PM, Lusotec wrote: > Android *never* used a "heavily modified [Linux] kernel" Where do you get your fantasies from? "the massive chore of completely integrating the code bases is not complete." http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/app-builder/linux-kernel-33-reunites-android-and-linuxs-mainline/1089 Also: http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/android-kernel-problems.html Also: "At LinuxCon, Torvalds explained, that “there's still a lot of merger to be done. ... but that eventually Android and Linux would come back to a common kernel, but it will probably not be for four to five years.” http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/linus-torvalds-on-android-the-linux-fork/9426
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 10:35 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87zjir4ads.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #242704 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes: > On 5/8/2014 2:33 PM, Lusotec wrote: > >> Android *never* used a "heavily modified [Linux] kernel" > > Where do you get your fantasies from? > > "the massive chore of completely integrating the code bases is not complete." > > http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/app-builder/linux-kernel-33-reunites-android-and-linuxs-mainline/1089 > > Also: http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/android-kernel-problems.html > > Also: "At LinuxCon, Torvalds explained, that “there's still a lot of merger to > be done. ... but that eventually Android and Linux would come back to a common > kernel, but it will probably not be for four to five years.” > > http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/linus-torvalds-on-android-the-linux-fork/9426 > User space is hugely different but the core kernel isn't that far from the (at the time) Linux kernel. It was modified but whether you can say "heavily" is another issue. -- "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 11:08 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <lki5uq$eb9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #242709 |
The lying imbecile Hadron Larry snotted: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes: > >> On 5/8/2014 2:33 PM, Lusotec wrote: >> >>> Android *never* used a "heavily modified [Linux] kernel" >> >> Where do you get your fantasies from? >> >> "the massive chore of completely integrating the code bases is not >> complete." >> >> http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/app-builder/linux-kernel-33-reunites-android-and-linuxs-mainline/1089 >> >> Also: http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/android-kernel-problems.html >> >> Also: "At LinuxCon, Torvalds explained, that “there's still a lot of >> merger to be done. ... but that eventually Android and Linux would come >> back to a common kernel, but it will probably not be for four to five >> years.” >> >> http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/linus-torvalds-on-android-the-linux-fork/9426 >> > > User space is hugely different No, it isn't. For that reason Qt runs nativly on Android And you can easily install the Debian shell and X. Available in the Google store. That those are not pre-installed does not mean that android is "hugely different" > but the core kernel isn't that far from > the (at the time) Linux kernel. It was modified but whether you can say > "heavily" is another issue. > By now the merger is nearly complete. That link from DFS is 3 years old
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 09:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lki7mt$or3$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #242711 |
On Fri, 09 May 2014 11:08:42 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > By now the merger is nearly complete. That link from DFS is 3 years old DuFuS never has been able to figure out the age of "news" stories. -- Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 06:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <r5gpm9te28oheir3ub7t7sv57834jcch2r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #242712 |
RonB wrote: > Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> >> By now the merger is nearly complete. That link from DFS is 3 years old > >DuFuS never has been able to figure out the age of "news" stories. Yeah, I might be able to dig-up an article that says that Dumfsck and Quack are not lying pieces of shit, but it would have to have been written before they were born... -- "(What Micheal Dell said) negates every 'idiotic lie' cola losers have ever drooled about Microsoft controlling OEMs." - DumFSck, lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 14:19 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87a9ar401h.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #242731 |
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> writes: > RonB wrote: > >> Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>> >>> By now the merger is nearly complete. That link from DFS is 3 years old >> >>DuFuS never has been able to figure out the age of "news" stories. > > Yeah, I might be able to dig-up an article that says that Dumfsck and > Quack are not lying pieces of shit, but it would have to have been > written before they were born... What lies, turd? Be specific. -- "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 08:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lkijf6$4hg$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #242712 |
On 5/9/2014 5:38 AM, RonB wrote: > On Fri, 09 May 2014 11:08:42 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >> By now the merger is nearly complete. That link from DFS is 3 years old > > DuFuS never has been able to figure out the age of "news" stories. RonG has never been able to read his fellow liars (in this case Lusotec) say things like "never".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 13:34 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87r443423n.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #242711 |
Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> writes: > The lying imbecile Hadron Larry snotted: > >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes: >> >>> On 5/8/2014 2:33 PM, Lusotec wrote: >>> >>>> Android *never* used a "heavily modified [Linux] kernel" >>> >>> Where do you get your fantasies from? >>> >>> "the massive chore of completely integrating the code bases is not >>> complete." >>> >>> http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/app-builder/linux-kernel-33-reunites-android-and-linuxs-mainline/1089 >>> >>> Also: http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/android-kernel-problems.html >>> >>> Also: "At LinuxCon, Torvalds explained, that “there's still a lot of >>> merger to be done. ... but that eventually Android and Linux would come >>> back to a common kernel, but it will probably not be for four to five >>> years.” >>> >>> http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/linus-torvalds-on-android-the-linux-fork/9426 >>> >> >> User space is hugely different > > No, it isn't. For that reason Qt runs nativly on Android > And you can easily install the Debian shell and X. Available in the Google > store. > That those are not pre-installed does not mean that android is "hugely > different" User space is HUGELY different. Do you know what "user space" is? This is the first link I bothered to google for you: http://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2013/05/13/what-are-the-major-changes-that-android-made-to-the-linux-kernel/ do NOT say you weren't provided it. Running "X" or "Debian shell" is NOT Android. Android is the modified kernel and the HUGELY DIFFERENT (from Linux based OS installations) USER SPACE. > >> but the core kernel isn't that far from >> the (at the time) Linux kernel. It was modified but whether you can say >> "heavily" is another issue. >> > > By now the merger is nearly complete. That link from DFS is 3 years old > -- "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 08:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lkijdp$4hg$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #242711 |
On 5/9/2014 5:08 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > The lying imbecile Hadron Larry snotted: > >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes: >> >>> On 5/8/2014 2:33 PM, Lusotec wrote: >>> >>>> Android *never* used a "heavily modified [Linux] kernel" >>> >>> Where do you get your fantasies from? >>> >>> "the massive chore of completely integrating the code bases is not >>> complete." >>> >>> http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/app-builder/linux-kernel-33-reunites-android-and-linuxs-mainline/1089 >>> >>> Also: http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/android-kernel-problems.html >>> >>> Also: "At LinuxCon, Torvalds explained, that “there's still a lot of >>> merger to be done. ... but that eventually Android and Linux would come >>> back to a common kernel, but it will probably not be for four to five >>> years.” >>> >>> http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/linus-torvalds-on-android-the-linux-fork/9426 >>> >> >> User space is hugely different > > No, it isn't. For that reason Qt runs nativly on Android > And you can easily install the Debian shell and X. Available in the Google > store. > That those are not pre-installed does not mean that android is "hugely > different" > >> but the core kernel isn't that far from >> the (at the time) Linux kernel. It was modified but whether you can say >> "heavily" is another issue. >> > > By now the merger is nearly complete. That link from DFS is 3 years old I know they're older links - that's because Lusotec said "never".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 08:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bt421vFhmotU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #242740 |
On 2014-05-09 12:58:25 +0000, DFS said: > On 5/9/2014 5:08 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> The lying imbecile Hadron Larry snotted: >> >>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes: >>> >>>> On 5/8/2014 2:33 PM, Lusotec wrote: >>>> >>>>> Android *never* used a "heavily modified [Linux] kernel" >>>> >>>> Where do you get your fantasies from? >>>> >>>> "the massive chore of completely integrating the code bases is not >>>> complete." >>>> >>>> http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/app-builder/linux-kernel-33-reunites-android-and-linuxs-mainline/1089 >>>> >>>> >>>> Also: http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/android-kernel-problems.html >>>> >>>> Also: "At LinuxCon, Torvalds explained, that “there's still a lot of >>>> merger to be done. ... but that eventually Android and Linux would come >>>> back to a common kernel, but it will probably not be for four to five >>>> years.” >>>> >>>> http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/linus-torvalds-on-android-the-linux-fork/9426 >>>> >>>> >>> >>> User space is hugely different >> >> No, it isn't. For that reason Qt runs nativly on Android >> And you can easily install the Debian shell and X. Available in the Google >> store. >> That those are not pre-installed does not mean that android is "hugely >> different" >> >>> but the core kernel isn't that far from >>> the (at the time) Linux kernel. It was modified but whether you can say >>> "heavily" is another issue. >>> >> >> By now the merger is nearly complete. That link from DFS is 3 years old > > > I know they're older links - that's because Lusotec said "never". Yep, he did say that! -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 08:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <rhmpm9lcmpcqs78j6sd3trhf3e9gm29q7i@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #242744 |
Lloyd E Parsons wrote: > DumFSck wrote: >> >> I know they're older links - that's because Lusotec said "never". > >Yep, he did say that! Idiots. In the same sentence, Lusotec wrote "and today Android runs on a main line Linux", which is an *admission* that it did not always run on a "main line Linux". So, while I admit that I don't understand Lusotec's point when he wrote that Android *never* used a "heavily modified [Linux] kernel", he must have had one, and it is *not* that it has always used the "standard" Linux kernel. *Some* people ask for clarification when there is an unclear point, instead of going on the attack and behaving like retarded little children. -- "Mono is a wonderful attempt to bring applications developed for Windows to the Linux desktop" - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 10:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lkinj3$482$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #242755 |
On 5/9/2014 9:45 AM, chrisv wrote: > Lloyd E Parsons wrote: > >> DumFSck wrote: >>> >>> I know they're older links - that's because Lusotec said "never". >> >> Yep, he did say that! > > Idiots. > > In the same sentence, Lusotec wrote "and today Android runs on a main > line Linux", which is an *admission* that it did not always run on a > "main line Linux". > > So, while I admit that I don't understand Lusotec's point when he > wrote that Android *never* used a "heavily modified [Linux] kernel", > he must have had one, and it is *not* that it has always used the > "standard" Linux kernel. > > *Some* people ask for clarification when there is an unclear point, Some people are stupid and need clarification of such a simple issue. The past and current differences between the Android and 'mainline' Linux kernels are irrelevant, anyway. The lame Linux "community" always has and always will dance and shout and label the Apache-licensed Android as "Linux" because it's widely used. It matters not one whit to you hypocrites that it's not Free software and totally violates the spirit if not the letter of Linux/FOSS. > instead of going on the attack and behaving like retarded little > children. heh! More hypocrisy. First thing you and the other stupid shits did is attack me when I showed the Android kernel was [in the past] heavily modified.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-09 06:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bt3tmtFgq58U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #242704 |
On 2014-05-09 03:20:08 +0000, DFS said: > On 5/8/2014 2:33 PM, Lusotec wrote: > >> Android *never* used a "heavily modified [Linux] kernel" > > > Where do you get your fantasies from? > > > > "the massive chore of completely integrating the code bases is not complete." > > http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/app-builder/linux-kernel-33-reunites-android-and-linuxs-mainline/1089 > > > > > Also: http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/android-kernel-problems.html > > > Also: "At LinuxCon, Torvalds explained, that “there's still a lot of > merger to be done. ... but that eventually Android and Linux would come > back to a common kernel, but it will probably not be for four to five > years.” > > http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/linus-torvalds-on-android-the-linux-fork/9426 > I guess this means the Linux 'advocates' are again incorrect about their favorite hobby OS... :) -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web