Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #243146 > unrolled thread

Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL

Started bySilver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm>
First post2014-05-12 12:36 -0400
Last post2014-05-13 09:08 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 211 — 17 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 12:36 -0400
    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 12:18 -0500
      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 13:07 -0500
        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 14:53 -0400
          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 14:26 -0500
        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 13:31 -0500
        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2014-05-12 21:25 +0200
          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 14:47 -0500
      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 20:23 +0200
        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 15:12 -0400
          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 14:38 -0500
            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-12 15:13 -0500
              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:08 -0400
                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:19 -0700
                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:51 -0700
                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-13 15:23 -0500
                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-13 15:48 -0500
                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 13:57 -0700
                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:20 -0400
                      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 15:22 -0700
                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 09:40 -0400
                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:19 -0400
                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-14 00:49 +0200
                      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 19:09 -0400
                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 15:14 -0500
                          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-14 20:55 -0400
                            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-15 06:47 -0500
                      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 16:58 -0700
                      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-14 06:48 -0500
                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 10:27 -0400
                          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 10:53 -0400
                            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 17:25 +0200
                              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 12:28 -0400
                                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 09:42 -0700
                                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 22:39 -0400
                                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 19:41 -0700
                                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 08:46 -0400
                                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:04 -0700
                              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:41 -0700
                            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 12:22 -0400
                              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 09:37 -0700
                              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 18:38 +0200
                                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 09:52 -0700
                                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 12:54 -0400
                              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:59 -0400
                            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:24 -0700
                              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 12:32 -0400
                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 15:15 -0500
                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 15:13 -0500
                      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:21 -0400
                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:26 -0400
                          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:31 -0400
                            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:35 -0400
                              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:41 -0400
                                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:50 -0400
                                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 15:36 -0700
                                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 19:09 -0400
                                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-16 12:59 -0400
                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 16:47 -0500
                          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-14 20:51 -0400
              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:30 -0700
            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:05 -0400
              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-13 15:21 -0500
            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 14:45 +0200
            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-13 17:38 -0400
      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 14:48 -0400
        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 14:24 -0500
          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 15:48 -0400
            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:19 -0600
            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-12 16:53 -0500
              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 17:14 -0600
              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:19 -0400
                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-13 15:18 -0500
                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:16 -0400
                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 15:12 -0500
                      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:24 -0400
                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:28 -0400
                          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:37 -0400
                            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:44 -0400
                              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 17:48 -0400
                                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 17:51 -0400
                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 16:51 -0500
                          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 00:29 +0200
                          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 19:16 -0400
                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:13 -0400
                          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 19:32 -0400
                            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:49 -0400
                              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 20:10 -0400
                                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 20:21 -0400
                                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 20:34 -0400
                                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:49 -0700
                                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 22:58 -0400
                                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 23:15 -0400
                                      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 23:19 -0400
                                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 20:29 -0700
                                      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 08:19 +0200
                                      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 08:56 -0400
                                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:18 -0700
                                    Real Life girl$$$ aren't that hot.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-05-15 03:21 -0700
                                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 08:49 -0400
                                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 08:17 +0200
                                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:30 -0700
                              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:32 -0700
                            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:21 -0700
              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-13 07:02 -0500
                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 10:17 -0400
                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:06 -0700
                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:10 -0700
                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:41 -0700
        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:19 -0600
          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:13 -0400
            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 18:40 -0600
              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-12 21:22 -0400
                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2014-05-12 20:50 -0600
                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 10:08 -0400
                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:13 -0700
                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-13 11:18 -0600
                      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 13:52 -0400
                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-13 12:55 -0600
                          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 17:47 -0400
                            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-13 20:09 -0600
                              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 22:22 -0400
                                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 19:39 -0700
                                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 07:38 +0200
                                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 10:24 -0400
                                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 08:30 -0700
                              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 19:43 -0700
    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 11:21 +0100
      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 10:16 -0400
        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 15:37 +0100
          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 16:56 +0200
            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 16:01 +0100
            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-13 11:16 -0400
              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:18 -0700
              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 16:38 +0100
                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-13 12:27 -0400
                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 09:42 -0700
                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 18:35 +0100
                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 10:39 -0700
                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 09:41 -0400
                      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 09:45 -0400
                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 08:33 -0700
                      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-14 15:58 +0100
                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 08:25 -0700
                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:12 -0700
                          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:29 -0700
                          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-14 17:35 +0100
                            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 18:40 +0200
                              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:48 -0700
                              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 09:50 -0700
                            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:42 -0700
                              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-14 17:57 +0100
                                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 10:07 -0700
                                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-14 18:36 +0100
                                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 10:51 -0700
                                      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-14 18:55 +0100
                                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 11:51 -0700
                                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 14:41 -0400
                                      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2014-05-14 20:48 +0200
                                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 14:50 -0400
                                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 14:51 -0400
                                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 12:04 -0700
                                      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 12:07 -0700
                                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 14:30 -0700
                                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 11:55 -0700
                                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 10:09 -0700
                            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 09:49 -0700
                              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:54 -0700
                      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 17:23 +0200
                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 08:39 -0700
                      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 08:33 -0700
            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-13 12:26 -0400
              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 18:51 +0200
              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 18:33 +0100
                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 09:21 -0400
                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 09:38 -0400
                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 17:21 +0200
                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-14 15:54 +0100
                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 12:14 -0400
                      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 18:36 +0200
                      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-14 17:46 +0100
                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 09:54 -0700
                          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 10:03 -0700
                          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 19:34 +0200
                            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 10:44 -0700
                        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:27 -0400
                          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 16:56 -0700
                          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 08:14 +0200
                          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-15 10:18 +0100
                            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 11:31 +0200
          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 10:59 -0400
            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 16:02 +0100
              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 11:11 -0400
                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:17 -0700
                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:39 -0700
                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 16:37 +0100
                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 11:45 -0400
                    Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2014-05-13 16:58 +0100
                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:50 -0700
                  Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 09:08 -0700
            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-13 11:06 -0400
              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 11:11 -0400
                Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:13 -0700
      Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-13 11:30 -0400
        Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-13 11:34 -0400
          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:38 -0700
          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:48 -0700
            Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-13 11:21 -0600
              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 10:28 -0700
              Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 10:43 -0700
          Re: Things That Drive Me Nuts About OpenGL Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 09:08 -0700

Page 10 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11  Next page →

#243647

FromWhite Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk>
Date2014-05-14 17:46 +0100
Message-ID<bthkvfFe8ilU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#243629
On 14/05/2014 17:14, DFS wrote:

> On 5/14/2014 10:54 AM, White Spirit wrote:

>> On 14/05/2014 14:21, DFS wrote:

>>> On 5/13/2014 1:33 PM, White Spirit wrote:

>>>> According to Hadron but that's his jealousy over the fact that I am
>>>> employed as a developer.  Quite why he has such issues is open to
>>>> conjecture; you can tell very easily from his demeanour on this group
>>>> that he feels threatened by pretty much everyone using Linux here.

>>> He's not threatened in the least by you twats.  If anything, he feels
>>> sad for all the Linux idiots here.

>> Yeah, right.  He displays all the classic symptoms.

>>>> No; I don't make things up - although you would of course prefer
>>>> that to
>>>> be true.

>>> You said once that your family was involved in slave trading.

>> I don't recall saying that.  Perhaps you can find the article; no doubt
>> I was winding someone up.

> "...my family didn't make their fortune in the slave trade in order that
> I could attend the best schools in England..."

> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/ddLum5mWup4/jl9k-VcS20QJ

Hilarious!  I'd forgotten I made that post.

>>> You claimed your code was "used by international recording stars whose
>>> names would blow your mind..."

>> That's not exactly what I said.

> But it's very, very close.  What's the exact quote?

> Google screwed up their previously works-well Advanced Group Search and
> made it extremely difficult to find exact Usenet posts and quotes.

I said it was used by names that would crack the ground (or earth) if 
dropped.

>> It is used for a variety of purposes
>> including live performances, television etc. by people involved in the
>> lighting industry and yes, some of the most successful bands and
>> musicians do make use of it.

> How do we know you're not just 'winding someone up' with this claim?

That's the beauty of Usenet; you don't but it pisses off people like you 
and Hadron nevertheless.

>>> You said "python is not a programming language".

>> An obvious reference to Ray Lopez when quoted in context.

> Liar.

> Dopez was nowhere around.  You responded directly to Rex Ballard in the
> thread 'Top 10 Programming Languages'.

> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/ddLum5mWup4%5B1-25-false%5D

I can see why that thread got your knickers in such a twist; my entire 
contribution was trolling of the highest order and it galls you that I 
could be so much more successful at it than you.

>>> So who can tell which of your babbling is made up?

>> Anyone who is not an idiot, deliberate or otherwise.

> So of the 3 claims you made, how do we (if not in IT) know which is your
> bullshit and which isn't?

Why do you even care?  You trolls are the ones who like to accuse people 
of lying the whole time whereas any of your claims get a 'free pass' to 
use the terminology adopted by Flatchest.

> You've been acting the same 'post idiocy and run' fool for at least 4
> years.  Why?

Because you amuse me.  Since you're inacapable of engaging in honest 
debate, it's the only use you have left.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243654

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2014-05-14 09:54 -0700
Message-ID<CF98EDDF.37455%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#243647
On 5/14/14, 9:46 AM, in article bthkvfFe8ilU1@mid.individual.net, "White
Spirit" <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> wrote:

>> Dopez was nowhere around.  You responded directly to Rex Ballard in the
>> thread 'Top 10 Programming Languages'.
> 
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/ddLum5mWup4%5B
>> 1-25-false%5D
> 
> I can see why that thread got your knickers in such a twist; my entire
> contribution was trolling of the highest order and it galls you that I
> could be so much more successful at it than you.

I commend you for admitting you merely troll for attention. Yes, it is
obvious you do - lying and spewing utter nonsense just because you want
someone to pay attention to you.

Rather pathetic.


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243658

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2014-05-14 10:03 -0700
Message-ID<d206fb44-7f25-4a0d-9cd2-99bafc5ea31c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#243654
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 10:54:39 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> On 5/14/14, 9:46 AM, in article bthkvfFe8ilU1@mid.individual.net, "White
> 
> Spirit" <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> >> Dopez was nowhere around.  You responded directly to Rex Ballard in the
> 
> >> thread 'Top 10 Programming Languages'.
> 
> > 
> 
> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/ddLum5mWup4%5B
> 
> >> 1-25-false%5D
> 
> > 
> 
> > I can see why that thread got your knickers in such a twist; my entire
> 
> > contribution was trolling of the highest order and it galls you that I
> 
> > could be so much more successful at it than you.
> 
> 
> 
> I commend you for admitting you merely troll for attention. Yes, it is
> 
> obvious you do - lying and spewing utter nonsense just because you want
> 
> someone to pay attention to you.
> 
> 
> 
> Rather pathetic.

As opposed to you, who does all that and much more while only occasionally admitting to some of it. 

By the way, care to explain how it is "obvious", you know, being that you, a known liar, are the one making the claim? 

Careful here, Snit... the moment you produce people other than yourself as "evidence" you will then validate your quotes list, a thing you've claimed has no validity. Oops!  And you *know* what happens if you decide to use the 'admission' angle... poor Snit... reality is just entirely against him ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243665

FromHadron<hadronquark@gmail.com>
Date2014-05-14 19:34 +0200
Message-ID<87mwekjmcd.fsf@gmail.com>
In reply to#243654
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:

> On 5/14/14, 9:46 AM, in article bthkvfFe8ilU1@mid.individual.net, "White
> Spirit" <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>> Dopez was nowhere around.  You responded directly to Rex Ballard in the
>>> thread 'Top 10 Programming Languages'.
>> 
>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/ddLum5mWup4%5B
>>> 1-25-false%5D
>> 
>> I can see why that thread got your knickers in such a twist; my entire
>> contribution was trolling of the highest order and it galls you that I
>> could be so much more successful at it than you.
>
> I commend you for admitting you merely troll for attention. Yes, it is
> obvious you do - lying and spewing utter nonsense just because you want
> someone to pay attention to you.
>
> Rather pathetic.

Ah the old "I was trolling" routine.

Yes funny how many COLA liars, when called on their lies, were suddenly
"trolling". The problem for liars is that they need a good memory. White
Spurt and Creepy don't.

-- 
"I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." 
The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree.
PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243667

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2014-05-14 10:44 -0700
Message-ID<2f67d6bf-67a5-45b0-b925-dc83327d284a@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#243665
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 11:34:26 AM UTC-6, Hadron wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:
> 
> 
> 
> > On 5/14/14, 9:46 AM, in article bthkvfFe8ilU1@mid.individual.net, "White
> 
> > Spirit" <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> >
> 
> >>> Dopez was nowhere around.  You responded directly to Rex Ballard in the
> 
> >>> thread 'Top 10 Programming Languages'.
> 
> >> 
> 
> >>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/ddLum5mWup4%5B
> 
> >>> 1-25-false%5D
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> I can see why that thread got your knickers in such a twist; my entire
> 
> >> contribution was trolling of the highest order and it galls you that I
> 
> >> could be so much more successful at it than you.
> 
> >
> 
> > I commend you for admitting you merely troll for attention. Yes, it is
> 
> > obvious you do - lying and spewing utter nonsense just because you want
> 
> > someone to pay attention to you.
> 
> >
> 
> > Rather pathetic.
> 
> 
> 
> Ah the old "I was trolling" routine.
> 
> 
> 
> Yes funny how many COLA liars, when called on their lies, were suddenly
> 
> "trolling". The problem for liars is that they need a good memory.

What's far more "funny" is you saying this to who you are... as if Snit's well known, decade+ history of lying doesn't exist.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243738

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2014-05-14 19:27 -0400
Message-ID<ll0u5r$cap$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#243647
On 5/14/2014 12:46 PM, White Spirit wrote:
> On 14/05/2014 17:14, DFS wrote:
>
>> On 5/14/2014 10:54 AM, White Spirit wrote:
>
>>> On 14/05/2014 14:21, DFS wrote:
>
>>>> On 5/13/2014 1:33 PM, White Spirit wrote:
>
>>>>> According to Hadron but that's his jealousy over the fact that I am
>>>>> employed as a developer.  Quite why he has such issues is open to
>>>>> conjecture; you can tell very easily from his demeanour on this group
>>>>> that he feels threatened by pretty much everyone using Linux here.
>
>>>> He's not threatened in the least by you twats.  If anything, he feels
>>>> sad for all the Linux idiots here.
>
>>> Yeah, right.  He displays all the classic symptoms.
>
>>>>> No; I don't make things up - although you would of course prefer
>>>>> that to be true.
>
>>>> You said once that your family was involved in slave trading.
>
>>> I don't recall saying that.  Perhaps you can find the article; no doubt
>>> I was winding someone up.
>
>> "...my family didn't make their fortune in the slave trade in order that
>> I could attend the best schools in England..."
>
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/ddLum5mWup4/jl9k-VcS20QJ
>>
>
> Hilarious!  I'd forgotten I made that post.

You just claimed "I don't make things up".  So, is that made up or not?



>>>> You claimed your code was "used by international recording stars whose
>>>> names would blow your mind..."
>
>>> That's not exactly what I said.
>
>> But it's very, very close.  What's the exact quote?
>
>> Google screwed up their previously works-well Advanced Group Search and
>> made it extremely difficult to find exact Usenet posts and quotes.
>
> I said it was used by names that would crack the ground (or earth) if
> dropped.

What's the exact quote?  You have it in your newsreader, don't you? It's 
from ~March 2011


>>> It is used for a variety of purposes
>>> including live performances, television etc. by people involved in the
>>> lighting industry and yes, some of the most successful bands and
>>> musicians do make use of it.
>
>> How do we know you're not just 'winding someone up' with this claim?
>
> That's the beauty of Usenet; you don't but it pisses off people like you
> and Hadron nevertheless.


I'm not pissed.


>>>> You said "python is not a programming language".
>
>>> An obvious reference to Ray Lopez when quoted in context.
>
>> Liar.
>
>> Dopez was nowhere around.  You responded directly to Rex Ballard in the
>> thread 'Top 10 Programming Languages'.
>
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/ddLum5mWup4%5B1-25-false%5D
>>
>
> I can see why that thread got your knickers in such a twist; my entire
> contribution was trolling of the highest order and it galls you that I
> could be so much more successful at it than you.

You're a liar.  You believed then (and probably still do) that python 
wasn't a programming language.

You only call it "trolling" now, after everyone in that thread made you 
look like a fool.



>>>> So who can tell which of your babbling is made up?
>
>>> Anyone who is not an idiot, deliberate or otherwise.
>
>> So of the 3 claims you made, how do we (if not in IT) know which is your
>> bullshit and which isn't?
>
> Why do you even care?  You trolls are the ones who like to accuse people
> of lying the whole time whereas any of your claims get a 'free pass' to
> use the terminology adopted by Flatchest.


Which "troll claims" are you referring to?  I question everyone who 
makes outlandish claims.

But the fact is, almost 100% of the outlandish claims made on cola are 
made by Linux idiots:

* you (more bugs in OSX than Snit's KDE video, my systems are enjoyed
   by millions of people).

* Rex Ballard (dozens of bullshit claims).

* Walrus 7 (developed a "global financial transaction system" that
   analyzed 500,000,000 data points in 30 mintues using SQLite and
   Gambas on a low-level PC)

* Jim (rode 220 miles in 8 hours on a mtn bike)

* Hypocrite Homer (he and a small team could do the Munich Linux
   migration in 6 months)

* Linuxiac (Linux is 8X quicker than Windows, even for gaming)

* Dopez (Windows advocate): almost too many bullshit boasts to mention:
   self-made millionaire by age 30, chess master, 140IQ, rocket
   scientist, Ph.D., SQL guru, D.C. power broker, counseled Bill Gates,
   is black, makes $300/hr as a 'consultant', sold code to a Silicon
   Valley venture capitalist)

* Gortard ("Hotmail went down hundreds of times in 2008")

* raytard ("I had one or two minor issues in 7 years of using Gentoo")

* Kohlmann (claimed he's the ONLY person to ever write an
   entire BIOS by himself)


In short, most of the Linux "advocates" who ever stunk up this place.

flattie once claimed she had perfect pitch - something 1 in 10K people 
have.  So I asked for proof, and she made a screen recording of an 
online test I asked her to do.

If you can't prove your grandiose claims - and YOU can't - don't make them.



>> You've been acting the same 'post idiocy and run' fool for at least 4
>> years.  Why?
>
> Because you amuse me.

You act a fool because of me?

Now that's smart!



> Since you're inacapable of engaging in honest
> debate, it's the only use you have left.


Where was I dishonest?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243747

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2014-05-14 16:56 -0700
Message-ID<CF9950A2.374DC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#243738
On 5/14/14, 4:27 PM, in article ll0u5r$cap$1@dont-email.me, "DFS"
<nospam@dfs.com> wrote:

>>> So of the 3 claims you made, how do we (if not in IT) know which is your
>>> bullshit and which isn't?
>> 
>> Why do you even care?  You trolls are the ones who like to accuse people
>> of lying the whole time whereas any of your claims get a 'free pass' to
>> use the terminology adopted by Flatchest.
> 
> 
> Which "troll claims" are you referring to?  I question everyone who
> makes outlandish claims.
> 
> But the fact is, almost 100% of the outlandish claims made on cola are
> made by Linux idiots:
> 
> * you (more bugs in OSX than Snit's KDE video, my systems are enjoyed
>    by millions of people).
> 
> * Rex Ballard (dozens of bullshit claims).
> 
> * Walrus 7 (developed a "global financial transaction system" that
>    analyzed 500,000,000 data points in 30 mintues using SQLite and
>    Gambas on a low-level PC)
> 
> * Jim (rode 220 miles in 8 hours on a mtn bike)
> 
> * Hypocrite Homer (he and a small team could do the Munich Linux
>    migration in 6 months)
> 
> * Linuxiac (Linux is 8X quicker than Windows, even for gaming)
> 
> * Dopez (Windows advocate): almost too many bullshit boasts to mention:
>    self-made millionaire by age 30, chess master, 140IQ, rocket
>    scientist, Ph.D., SQL guru, D.C. power broker, counseled Bill Gates,
>    is black, makes $300/hr as a 'consultant', sold code to a Silicon
>    Valley venture capitalist)
> 
> * Gortard ("Hotmail went down hundreds of times in 2008")
> 
> * raytard ("I had one or two minor issues in 7 years of using Gentoo")
> 
> * Kohlmann (claimed he's the ONLY person to ever write an
>    entire BIOS by himself)
> 
> 
> In short, most of the Linux "advocates" who ever stunk up this place.

Great list... even if incomplete. Heck, my list of Köhlmann's comments is
quite lengthy and well referenced.

> flattie once claimed she had perfect pitch - something 1 in 10K people
> have.  So I asked for proof, and she made a screen recording of an
> online test I asked her to do.

I would love to see this!

> If you can't prove your grandiose claims - and YOU can't - don't make them.



-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243798

FromHadron<hadronquark@gmail.com>
Date2014-05-15 08:14 +0200
Message-ID<8761l7a7rr.fsf@gmail.com>
In reply to#243738
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes:

> On 5/14/2014 12:46 PM, White Spirit wrote:
>> On 14/05/2014 17:14, DFS wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/14/2014 10:54 AM, White Spirit wrote:
>>
>>>> On 14/05/2014 14:21, DFS wrote:
>>
>>>>> On 5/13/2014 1:33 PM, White Spirit wrote:
>>
>>>>>> According to Hadron but that's his jealousy over the fact that I am
>>>>>> employed as a developer.  Quite why he has such issues is open to
>>>>>> conjecture; you can tell very easily from his demeanour on this group
>>>>>> that he feels threatened by pretty much everyone using Linux here.
>>
>>>>> He's not threatened in the least by you twats.  If anything, he feels
>>>>> sad for all the Linux idiots here.
>>
>>>> Yeah, right.  He displays all the classic symptoms.
>>
>>>>>> No; I don't make things up - although you would of course prefer
>>>>>> that to be true.
>>
>>>>> You said once that your family was involved in slave trading.
>>
>>>> I don't recall saying that.  Perhaps you can find the article; no doubt
>>>> I was winding someone up.
>>
>>> "...my family didn't make their fortune in the slave trade in order that
>>> I could attend the best schools in England..."
>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/ddLum5mWup4/jl9k-VcS20QJ
>>>
>>
>> Hilarious!  I'd forgotten I made that post.
>
> You just claimed "I don't make things up".  So, is that made up or not?
>
>>>>> You claimed your code was "used by international recording stars whose
>>>>> names would blow your mind..."
>>
>>>> That's not exactly what I said.
>>
>>> But it's very, very close.  What's the exact quote?
>>
>>> Google screwed up their previously works-well Advanced Group Search and
>>> made it extremely difficult to find exact Usenet posts and quotes.
>>
>> I said it was used by names that would crack the ground (or earth) if
>> dropped.
>
> What's the exact quote?  You have it in your newsreader, don't you? It's from
> ~March 2011
>
>>>> It is used for a variety of purposes
>>>> including live performances, television etc. by people involved in the
>>>> lighting industry and yes, some of the most successful bands and
>>>> musicians do make use of it.
>>
>>> How do we know you're not just 'winding someone up' with this claim?
>>
>> That's the beauty of Usenet; you don't but it pisses off people like you
>> and Hadron nevertheless.
>
> I'm not pissed.
>
>>>>> You said "python is not a programming language".
>>
>>>> An obvious reference to Ray Lopez when quoted in context.
>>
>>> Liar.
>>
>>> Dopez was nowhere around.  You responded directly to Rex Ballard in the
>>> thread 'Top 10 Programming Languages'.
>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/ddLum5mWup4%5B1-25-false%5D
>>>
>>
>> I can see why that thread got your knickers in such a twist; my entire
>> contribution was trolling of the highest order and it galls you that I
>> could be so much more successful at it than you.
>
> You're a liar.  You believed then (and probably still do) that python wasn't a
> programming language.
>
> You only call it "trolling" now, after everyone in that thread made you look
> like a fool.
>
>>>>> So who can tell which of your babbling is made up?
>>
>>>> Anyone who is not an idiot, deliberate or otherwise.
>>
>>> So of the 3 claims you made, how do we (if not in IT) know which is your
>>> bullshit and which isn't?
>>
>> Why do you even care?  You trolls are the ones who like to accuse people
>> of lying the whole time whereas any of your claims get a 'free pass' to
>> use the terminology adopted by Flatchest.
>
> Which "troll claims" are you referring to?  I question everyone who makes
> outlandish claims.
>
> But the fact is, almost 100% of the outlandish claims made on cola are made by
> Linux idiots:
>
> * you (more bugs in OSX than Snit's KDE video, my systems are enjoyed
>   by millions of people).
>
> * Rex Ballard (dozens of bullshit claims).
>
> * Walrus 7 (developed a "global financial transaction system" that
>   analyzed 500,000,000 data points in 30 mintues using SQLite and
>   Gambas on a low-level PC)
>
> * Jim (rode 220 miles in 8 hours on a mtn bike)
>
> * Hypocrite Homer (he and a small team could do the Munich Linux
>   migration in 6 months)
>
> * Linuxiac (Linux is 8X quicker than Windows, even for gaming)
>
> * Dopez (Windows advocate): almost too many bullshit boasts to mention:
>   self-made millionaire by age 30, chess master, 140IQ, rocket
>   scientist, Ph.D., SQL guru, D.C. power broker, counseled Bill Gates,
>   is black, makes $300/hr as a 'consultant', sold code to a Silicon
>   Valley venture capitalist)
>
> * Gortard ("Hotmail went down hundreds of times in 2008")
>
> * raytard ("I had one or two minor issues in 7 years of using Gentoo")
>
> * Kohlmann (claimed he's the ONLY person to ever write an
>   entire BIOS by himself)
>
> In short, most of the Linux "advocates" who ever stunk up this place.
>
> flattie once claimed she had perfect pitch - something 1 in 10K people have.  So
> I asked for proof, and she made a screen recording of an online test I asked her
> to do.
>
> If you can't prove your grandiose claims - and YOU can't - don't make them.
>
>>> You've been acting the same 'post idiocy and run' fool for at least 4
>>> years.  Why?
>>
>> Because you amuse me.
>
> You act a fool because of me?
>
> Now that's smart!
>
>> Since you're inacapable of engaging in honest
>> debate, it's the only use you have left.

Honest "debate"? Spurt, telling lies and making big short claims isnt
debating old boy.

>
> Where was I dishonest?
>

Almost never. If not ever.


-- 
"I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." 
The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree.
PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243813

FromWhite Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk>
Date2014-05-15 10:18 +0100
Message-ID<btjf2pFppq1U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#243738
On 15/05/2014 00:27, DFS wrote:

> On 5/14/2014 12:46 PM, White Spirit wrote:

>> On 14/05/2014 17:14, DFS wrote:

>>> On 5/14/2014 10:54 AM, White Spirit wrote:

>>>>>> No; I don't make things up - although you would of course prefer
>>>>>> that to be true.

>>>>> You said once that your family was involved in slave trading.

>>>> I don't recall saying that.  Perhaps you can find the article; no doubt
>>>> I was winding someone up.

>>> "...my family didn't make their fortune in the slave trade in order that
>>> I could attend the best schools in England..."

>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/ddLum5mWup4/jl9k-VcS20QJ

>> Hilarious!  I'd forgotten I made that post.

> You just claimed "I don't make things up".  So, is that made up or not?

It certainly wasn't expected to be taken literally.  If you interepret 
that as me making things up then that is a characteristic of your 
dishonesty that you asked me about below.

>>>>> You claimed your code was "used by international recording stars whose
>>>>> names would blow your mind..."

>>>> That's not exactly what I said.

>>> But it's very, very close.  What's the exact quote?

>>> Google screwed up their previously works-well Advanced Group Search and
>>> made it extremely difficult to find exact Usenet posts and quotes.

>> I said it was used by names that would crack the ground (or earth) if
>> dropped.

> What's the exact quote?  You have it in your newsreader, don't you? It's
> from ~March 2011

I don't keep articles from three years ago.

>>>> It is used for a variety of purposes
>>>> including live performances, television etc. by people involved in the
>>>> lighting industry and yes, some of the most successful bands and
>>>> musicians do make use of it.

>>> How do we know you're not just 'winding someone up' with this claim?

>> That's the beauty of Usenet; you don't but it pisses off people like you
>> and Hadron nevertheless.

> I'm not pissed.

Of course you're not.

>>>>> You said "python is not a programming language".

>>>> An obvious reference to Ray Lopez when quoted in context.

>>> Liar.

>>> Dopez was nowhere around.  You responded directly to Rex Ballard in the
>>> thread 'Top 10 Programming Languages'.

>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/ddLum5mWup4%5B1-25-false%5D

>> I can see why that thread got your knickers in such a twist; my entire
>> contribution was trolling of the highest order and it galls you that I
>> could be so much more successful at it than you.

> You're a liar.  You believed then (and probably still do) that python
> wasn't a programming language.

You're the liar and it is obvious from that thread.

> You only call it "trolling" now, after everyone in that thread made you
> look like a fool.

Liar.

>>>>> So who can tell which of your babbling is made up?

>>>> Anyone who is not an idiot, deliberate or otherwise.

>>> So of the 3 claims you made, how do we (if not in IT) know which is your
>>> bullshit and which isn't?

>> Why do you even care?  You trolls are the ones who like to accuse people
>> of lying the whole time whereas any of your claims get a 'free pass' to
>> use the terminology adopted by Flatchest.

> Which "troll claims" are you referring to?  I question everyone who
> makes outlandish claims.

Really?  Why not ask Flatchest to prove that she is as successful in the 
music industry as she claims?

> But the fact is, almost 100% of the outlandish claims made on cola are
> made by Linux idiots:

> * you (more bugs in OSX than Snit's KDE video, my systems are enjoyed
>    by millions of people).

Both of those are true.

> flattie once claimed she had perfect pitch - something 1 in 10K people
> have.  So I asked for proof, and she made a screen recording of an
> online test I asked her to do.

> If you can't prove your grandiose claims - and YOU can't - don't make them.

There is nothing grandiose about anything I have claimed.

Ask Flatchest to prove her music credentials.

>>> You've been acting the same 'post idiocy and run' fool for at least 4
>>> years.  Why?

>> Because you amuse me.

> You act a fool because of me?

> Now that's smart!

It interests me to observe how people react.  For example, I post one 
article about bugs in Mavericks and all the COLA trolls have been 
jumping up and down ever since.  I find it fascinating how one article 
(that contained nothing untrue) can create such a chain reaction.

I find it even more interesting how one-sided the demands for proof are 
on COLA, which was the ultimate purpose behind me posting that article.

>> Since you're inacapable of engaging in honest
>> debate, it's the only use you have left.

> Where was I dishonest?

See above.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243815

FromHadron<hadronquark@gmail.com>
Date2014-05-15 11:31 +0200
Message-ID<87bnuzbd7q.fsf@development.richardriley.net>
In reply to#243813
White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> writes:

> On 15/05/2014 00:27, DFS wrote:
>
>> On 5/14/2014 12:46 PM, White Spirit wrote:
>
>>> On 14/05/2014 17:14, DFS wrote:
>
>>>> On 5/14/2014 10:54 AM, White Spirit wrote:
>
>>>>>>> No; I don't make things up - although you would of course prefer
>>>>>>> that to be true.
>
>>>>>> You said once that your family was involved in slave trading.
>
>>>>> I don't recall saying that.  Perhaps you can find the article; no doubt
>>>>> I was winding someone up.
>
>>>> "...my family didn't make their fortune in the slave trade in order that
>>>> I could attend the best schools in England..."
>
>>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/ddLum5mWup4/jl9k-VcS20QJ
>
>>> Hilarious!  I'd forgotten I made that post.
>
>> You just claimed "I don't make things up".  So, is that made up or not?
>
> It certainly wasn't expected to be taken literally.  If you interepret that as
> me making things up then that is a characteristic of your dishonesty that you
> asked me about below.
>
>>>>>> You claimed your code was "used by international recording stars whose
>>>>>> names would blow your mind..."
>
>>>>> That's not exactly what I said.
>
>>>> But it's very, very close.  What's the exact quote?
>
>>>> Google screwed up their previously works-well Advanced Group Search and
>>>> made it extremely difficult to find exact Usenet posts and quotes.
>
>>> I said it was used by names that would crack the ground (or earth) if
>>> dropped.
>
>> What's the exact quote?  You have it in your newsreader, don't you? It's
>> from ~March 2011
>
> I don't keep articles from three years ago.
>
>>>>> It is used for a variety of purposes
>>>>> including live performances, television etc. by people involved in the
>>>>> lighting industry and yes, some of the most successful bands and
>>>>> musicians do make use of it.
>
>>>> How do we know you're not just 'winding someone up' with this claim?
>
>>> That's the beauty of Usenet; you don't but it pisses off people like you
>>> and Hadron nevertheless.
>
>> I'm not pissed.
>
> Of course you're not.
>
>>>>>> You said "python is not a programming language".
>
>>>>> An obvious reference to Ray Lopez when quoted in context.
>
>>>> Liar.
>
>>>> Dopez was nowhere around.  You responded directly to Rex Ballard in the
>>>> thread 'Top 10 Programming Languages'.
>
>>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/ddLum5mWup4%5B1-25-false%5D
>
>>> I can see why that thread got your knickers in such a twist; my entire
>>> contribution was trolling of the highest order and it galls you that I
>>> could be so much more successful at it than you.
>
>> You're a liar.  You believed then (and probably still do) that python
>> wasn't a programming language.
>
> You're the liar and it is obvious from that thread.

Erm no. Nice try.

>
>> You only call it "trolling" now, after everyone in that thread made you
>> look like a fool.
>
> Liar.

Actually I dont see anyone rushing to your defence. And the reason is
you're a cocky blow hard that thought he could carve a niche here
through boasts and lies.

You are a liar.

http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243374

FromSilver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c>
Date2014-05-13 10:59 -0400
Message-ID<lktc0d$40c$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#243371
On 14-05-13 10:37 AM, White Spirit wrote:
> On 13/05/2014 15:16, Silver Slimer wrote:
> 
>> On 14-05-13 06:21 AM, White Spirit wrote:
> 
>>> On 12/05/2014 17:36, Silver Slimer wrote:
> 
>>>> Some of it might explain why most new games use DirectX rather than
>>>> OpenGL which would have made it easy to port games to all three
>>>> platforms.
> 
>>>> http://richg42.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/things-that-drive-me-nuts-about-opengl.html?spref=tw
>>>>
> 
>>> As if you understand the issues in the first place.
> 
>> I re-posted someone else's blog post not because I was taking credit for
>> it but because I found it interesting. Your sentence is therefore
>> unwarranted.
> 
> I'm just giving you a taste of your own medicine.  It's funny how you,
> DFS, Hardon, Flatchest and Snit can be relied upon to get upset whenever
> I do so.

Did I ever claim that you weren't knowledgeable about something? If so,
I apologize.

-- 
Silver Slimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243376

FromWhite Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk>
Date2014-05-13 16:02 +0100
Message-ID<bteqghFq8v3U2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#243374
On 13/05/2014 15:59, Silver Slimer wrote:

> On 14-05-13 10:37 AM, White Spirit wrote:

>> On 13/05/2014 15:16, Silver Slimer wrote:

>>> On 14-05-13 06:21 AM, White Spirit wrote:

>>>> On 12/05/2014 17:36, Silver Slimer wrote:

>>>>> Some of it might explain why most new games use DirectX rather than
>>>>> OpenGL which would have made it easy to port games to all three
>>>>> platforms.

>>>>> http://richg42.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/things-that-drive-me-nuts-about-opengl.html?spref=tw

>>>> As if you understand the issues in the first place.

>>> I re-posted someone else's blog post not because I was taking credit for
>>> it but because I found it interesting. Your sentence is therefore
>>> unwarranted.

>> I'm just giving you a taste of your own medicine.  It's funny how you,
>> DFS, Hardon, Flatchest and Snit can be relied upon to get upset whenever
>> I do so.

> Did I ever claim that you weren't knowledgeable about something? If so,
> I apologize.

To be fair, you have behaved more reasonably recently so it was churlish 
of me to have another dig at you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243379

FromSilver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c>
Date2014-05-13 11:11 -0400
Message-ID<lktcmi$8tp$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#243376
On 14-05-13 11:02 AM, White Spirit wrote:
> On 13/05/2014 15:59, Silver Slimer wrote:
> 
>> On 14-05-13 10:37 AM, White Spirit wrote:
> 
>>> On 13/05/2014 15:16, Silver Slimer wrote:
> 
>>>> On 14-05-13 06:21 AM, White Spirit wrote:
> 
>>>>> On 12/05/2014 17:36, Silver Slimer wrote:
> 
>>>>>> Some of it might explain why most new games use DirectX rather than
>>>>>> OpenGL which would have made it easy to port games to all three
>>>>>> platforms.
> 
>>>>>> http://richg42.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/things-that-drive-me-nuts-about-opengl.html?spref=tw
>>>>>>
> 
>>>>> As if you understand the issues in the first place.
> 
>>>> I re-posted someone else's blog post not because I was taking credit
>>>> for
>>>> it but because I found it interesting. Your sentence is therefore
>>>> unwarranted.
> 
>>> I'm just giving you a taste of your own medicine.  It's funny how you,
>>> DFS, Hardon, Flatchest and Snit can be relied upon to get upset whenever
>>> I do so.
> 
>> Did I ever claim that you weren't knowledgeable about something? If so,
>> I apologize.
> 
> To be fair, you have behaved more reasonably recently so it was churlish
> of me to have another dig at you.

I don't hate advocates or anything but I do hate being attacked by
people because they think I'm associated with Snit, "lied" (without
providing evidence) or because they think I'm insulting. The reality is
that if you insult me without any reason to, I'll freely insult you back
and mine will definitely be a lot more potent. However, you've been a
decent person and I think we can have pretty good discussions going forward.


-- 
Silver Slimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243392

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2014-05-13 08:17 -0700
Message-ID<CF978589.37285%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#243379
On 5/13/14, 8:11 AM, in article lktcmi$8tp$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
<ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote:

>>>> I'm just giving you a taste of your own medicine.  It's funny how you,
>>>> DFS, Hardon, Flatchest and Snit can be relied upon to get upset whenever
>>>> I do so.
>> 
>>> Did I ever claim that you weren't knowledgeable about something? If so,
>>> I apologize.
>> 
>> To be fair, you have behaved more reasonably recently so it was churlish
>> of me to have another dig at you.
> 
> I don't hate advocates or anything but I do hate being attacked by
> people because they think I'm associated with Snit, "lied" (without
> providing evidence)

So you hate when people claim someone lied but cannot provide evidence...
just as you do with me. Thank you for admitting you hate your own actions.

> or because they think I'm insulting.

You do not want people to react to your insults? LOL! Such an entitlement
attitude from you!

> The reality is that if you insult me without any reason to, I'll freely insult
> you back and mine will definitely be a lot more potent. However, you've been a
> decent person and I think we can have pretty good discussions going forward.

I am capable of having a decent discussion with just about anyone... even
folks such as you and White Spirit who make claims you cannot support.


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243399

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2014-05-13 08:39 -0700
Message-ID<2ca13579-06bc-4064-b54b-57e9134373cf@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#243392
On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 3:17:13 PM UTC, Snit wrote:
> On 5/13/14, 8:11 AM, in article lktcmi$8tp$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
> 
> <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> >>>> I'm just giving you a taste of your own medicine.  It's funny how you,
> 
> >>>> DFS, Hardon, Flatchest and Snit can be relied upon to get upset whenever
> 
> >>>> I do so.
> 
> >> 
> 
> >>> Did I ever claim that you weren't knowledgeable about something? If so,
> 
> >>> I apologize.
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> To be fair, you have behaved more reasonably recently so it was churlish
> 
> >> of me to have another dig at you.
> 
> > 
> 
> > I don't hate advocates or anything but I do hate being attacked by
> 
> > people because they think I'm associated with Snit, "lied" (without
> 
> > providing evidence)
> 
> 
> 
> So you hate when people claim someone lied but cannot provide evidence...
> 
> just as you do with me. Thank you for admitting you hate your own actions.
> 
> 
> 
> > or because they think I'm insulting.
> 
> 
> 
> You do not want people to react to your insults? LOL! Such an entitlement
> 
> attitude from you!
> 
> 
> 
> > The reality is that if you insult me without any reason to, I'll freely insult
> 
> > you back and mine will definitely be a lot more potent. However, you've been a
> 
> > decent person and I think we can have pretty good discussions going forward.
> 
> 
> 
> I am capable of having a decent discussion with just about anyone... even
> 
> folks such as you and White Spirit who make claims you cannot support.
> 
> 
You can not have a decent conversation with anyone. You run.
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
> 
> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
> 
> * Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
> 
> * Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
> 
> * Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
> 
> * Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
> 
> * Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
> 
> * Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
> 
> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

Another forum ruined by 
Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy of Prescott, Arizona 86301 
http://prescottcomputerguy.com 
The best website design in Prescott, AZ is shown at his own site 
http://prescottcomputerguy.com/web-design.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243396

FromWhite Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk>
Date2014-05-13 16:37 +0100
Message-ID<btesibFqn3kU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#243379
On 13/05/2014 16:11, Silver Slimer wrote:

> On 14-05-13 11:02 AM, White Spirit wrote:

>> To be fair, you have behaved more reasonably recently so it was churlish
>> of me to have another dig at you.

> I don't hate advocates or anything but I do hate being attacked by
> people because they think I'm associated with Snit, "lied" (without
> providing evidence) or because they think I'm insulting. The reality is
> that if you insult me without any reason to, I'll freely insult you back
> and mine will definitely be a lot more potent. However, you've been a
> decent person and I think we can have pretty good discussions going forward.

What can be more potent an insult than associating someone with Snit?  :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243403

FromSilver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c>
Date2014-05-13 11:45 -0400
Message-ID<lktenj$q72$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#243396
On 14-05-13 11:37 AM, White Spirit wrote:
> On 13/05/2014 16:11, Silver Slimer wrote:
> 
>> On 14-05-13 11:02 AM, White Spirit wrote:
> 
>>> To be fair, you have behaved more reasonably recently so it was churlish
>>> of me to have another dig at you.
> 
>> I don't hate advocates or anything but I do hate being attacked by
>> people because they think I'm associated with Snit, "lied" (without
>> providing evidence) or because they think I'm insulting. The reality is
>> that if you insult me without any reason to, I'll freely insult you back
>> and mine will definitely be a lot more potent. However, you've been a
>> decent person and I think we can have pretty good discussions going
>> forward.
> 
> What can be more potent an insult than associating someone with Snit?  :)

Being called Snit.

-- 
Silver Slimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243408

FromWhite Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk>
Date2014-05-13 16:58 +0100
Message-ID<btetojFqvuqU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#243403
On 13/05/2014 16:45, Silver Slimer wrote:

> On 14-05-13 11:37 AM, White Spirit wrote:

>> On 13/05/2014 16:11, Silver Slimer wrote:

>>> On 14-05-13 11:02 AM, White Spirit wrote:

>>>> To be fair, you have behaved more reasonably recently so it was churlish
>>>> of me to have another dig at you.

>>> I don't hate advocates or anything but I do hate being attacked by
>>> people because they think I'm associated with Snit, "lied" (without
>>> providing evidence) or because they think I'm insulting. The reality is
>>> that if you insult me without any reason to, I'll freely insult you back
>>> and mine will definitely be a lot more potent. However, you've been a
>>> decent person and I think we can have pretty good discussions going
>>> forward.

>> What can be more potent an insult than associating someone with Snit?  :)

> Being called Snit.

True.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243405

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2014-05-13 08:50 -0700
Message-ID<e11c5147-4de4-49f1-95cd-075659b72429@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#243396
On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 9:37:46 AM UTC-6, White Spirit wrote:
> On 13/05/2014 16:11, Silver Slimer wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > On 14-05-13 11:02 AM, White Spirit wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> >> To be fair, you have behaved more reasonably recently so it was churlish
> 
> >> of me to have another dig at you.
> 
> 
> 
> > I don't hate advocates or anything but I do hate being attacked by
> 
> > people because they think I'm associated with Snit, "lied" (without
> 
> > providing evidence) or because they think I'm insulting. The reality is
> 
> > that if you insult me without any reason to, I'll freely insult you back
> 
> > and mine will definitely be a lot more potent. However, you've been a
> 
> > decent person and I think we can have pretty good discussions going forward.
> 
> 
> 
> What can be more potent an insult than associating someone with Snit?  :)

Even associations with 'the Devil', Hitler, Stalin, etc. pale in comparison. That's quite a feat! LOL!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243409

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2014-05-13 09:08 -0700
Message-ID<CF979176.372A2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#243396
On 5/13/14, 8:37 AM, in article btesibFqn3kU1@mid.individual.net, "White
Spirit" <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> wrote:

> On 13/05/2014 16:11, Silver Slimer wrote:
> 
>> On 14-05-13 11:02 AM, White Spirit wrote:
> 
>>> To be fair, you have behaved more reasonably recently so it was churlish
>>> of me to have another dig at you.
> 
>> I don't hate advocates or anything but I do hate being attacked by
>> people because they think I'm associated with Snit, "lied" (without
>> providing evidence) or because they think I'm insulting. The reality is
>> that if you insult me without any reason to, I'll freely insult you back
>> and mine will definitely be a lot more potent. However, you've been a
>> decent person and I think we can have pretty good discussions going forward.
> 
> What can be more potent an insult than associating someone with Snit?  :)

For people who hate evidence, logic, and reason you are absolutely correct!


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 10 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web