Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #686761 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-02-27 13:03 -0600 |
| Last post | 2025-03-11 20:50 -0700 |
| Articles | 4 on this page of 24 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Mercury Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-27 13:03 -0600
Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-28 10:24 -0800
Re: Mercury Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 12:34 -0600
Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-28 11:35 -0800
Re: Mercury Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 18:01 -0600
Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-28 22:51 -0800
Re: Mercury % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 07:15 -0700
Re: Mercury Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 10:41 -0600
Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-01 12:57 -0800
Re: Mercury Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 15:48 -0600
Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-01 14:00 -0800
Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-01 23:17 -0800
Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-04 23:14 -0800
Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-05 11:20 -0800
Re: Mercury vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-03-06 04:56 +0000
Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-05 21:35 -0800
Re: Mercury vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-03-06 05:38 +0000
Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-06 13:34 -0800
Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-10 22:35 -0700
Re: Mercury Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-03-06 08:32 +0100
Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-06 13:31 -0800
Re: Mercury Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-03-08 08:17 +0100
Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-11 17:41 -0700
Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-11 20:50 -0700
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-06 13:31 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <67CA1436.1ECE@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #687106 |
Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am Donnerstag000006, 06.03.2025 um 06:35 schrieb The Starmaker: > > >>> Can you name the Primary Colors? > >>> > >>> If you ask that question to ANYBODY..they will all give you the WRONG > >>> answers. > >>> > >>> > >>> Here is the right answer: red, blue, green and yellow. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> definition: > >>> pri·ma·ry a primary color. > >>> > >>> https://www.google.com/search?q=define+primary&oq=define+primary > >> > >> Not true for light: > >> > >> With color-picker(1), if I mix red and green, I get yellow. > >> > >> https://imgur.com/ZBxIObk > > > > Another person as inglish for a second language.. > > > > The Question reads: "Can you name the Primary Colors?" > > > > you named 3, you're missing the color Blue. > > > > > There are no such things as 'the primary colours', because color itself > is a function of the (human) eyes and brain. > > But 'human eyes' are actually specific to us as human beings and > therefore not 'primary'. > > What we humans regard as colour is created by three types of cells in > the eyes, which are receptive for certain spectra in the visible range, > which we humans call 'red', 'green' and 'blue'. > > With these three types of cell we can see colours in the visible part of > the vast range of possible em-frequencies. > > Other creatures have different eyes and can see diffent colours, > possibly with a different set of primary colours (for which we have no > names). > > TH I gave everybody a link so they can understand the definition of the word..."primary". The link states: definition: a primary color. And dis German guy sez "There are no such things as 'the primary colours'"! Is anybody surprised? I cannot even ask dat German guy to name 'a primary color' since he tinks "There are no such things as 'primary colours'" i guess he thinks the World Belongs To Him. he gots his own fucking dictionary!!!! My Kampftictionary. Vhy does he put a u in colors???? ENGLISH is the Offical Language of the United States!...and tomorrow the ...VORLD! So learn inglish quick, or death by hanging. And learn how to spel "colors" corecttly! -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-08 08:17 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <m3296qFtednU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #687115 |
Am Donnerstag000006, 06.03.2025 um 22:31 schrieb The Starmaker: > Thomas Heger wrote: >> >> Am Donnerstag000006, 06.03.2025 um 06:35 schrieb The Starmaker: >> >>>>> Can you name the Primary Colors? >>>>> >>>>> If you ask that question to ANYBODY..they will all give you the WRONG >>>>> answers. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Here is the right answer: red, blue, green and yellow. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> definition: >>>>> pri·ma·ry a primary color. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.google.com/search?q=define+primary&oq=define+primary >>>> >>>> Not true for light: >>>> >>>> With color-picker(1), if I mix red and green, I get yellow. >>>> >>>> https://imgur.com/ZBxIObk >>> >>> Another person as inglish for a second language.. >>> >>> The Question reads: "Can you name the Primary Colors?" >>> >>> you named 3, you're missing the color Blue. >>> >>> >> There are no such things as 'the primary colours', because color itself >> is a function of the (human) eyes and brain. >> >> But 'human eyes' are actually specific to us as human beings and >> therefore not 'primary'. >> >> What we humans regard as colour is created by three types of cells in >> the eyes, which are receptive for certain spectra in the visible range, >> which we humans call 'red', 'green' and 'blue'. >> >> With these three types of cell we can see colours in the visible part of >> the vast range of possible em-frequencies. >> >> Other creatures have different eyes and can see diffent colours, >> possibly with a different set of primary colours (for which we have no >> names). >> >> TH > > > I gave everybody a link so they can understand the definition of the > word..."primary". > > > The link states: > > definition: > a primary color. > > > > And dis German guy sez "There are no such things as 'the primary > colours'"! Look at this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trichromacy Quote: "The normal explanation of trichromacy is that the organism's retina contains three types of color receptors (called cone cells in vertebrates) with different absorption spectra. In actuality, the number of such receptor types may be greater than three, since different types may be active at different light intensities. In vertebrates with three types of cone cells, at low light intensities the rod cells may contribute to color vision. Humans and other animals that are trichromatsHumans and some other mammals have evolved trichromacy based partly on pigments inherited from early vertebrates. In fish and birds, for example, four pigments are used for vision. " > > Is anybody surprised? > > > > > I cannot even ask dat German guy to name 'a primary color' since he > tinks "There are no such things as 'primary colours'" > Well, you need to specify, to which kind of beings you refer with 'primary colour'. Humans have three primary colours, which are called 'red, blue and green'. ... TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-11 17:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <67D0D829.8A4@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #687173 |
Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am Donnerstag000006, 06.03.2025 um 22:31 schrieb The Starmaker: > > Thomas Heger wrote: > >> > >> Am Donnerstag000006, 06.03.2025 um 06:35 schrieb The Starmaker: > >> > >>>>> Can you name the Primary Colors? > >>>>> > >>>>> If you ask that question to ANYBODY..they will all give you the WRONG > >>>>> answers. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Here is the right answer: red, blue, green and yellow. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> definition: > >>>>> pri·ma·ry a primary color. > >>>>> > >>>>> https://www.google.com/search?q=define+primary&oq=define+primary > >>>> > >>>> Not true for light: > >>>> > >>>> With color-picker(1), if I mix red and green, I get yellow. > >>>> > >>>> https://imgur.com/ZBxIObk > >>> > >>> Another person as inglish for a second language.. > >>> > >>> The Question reads: "Can you name the Primary Colors?" > >>> > >>> you named 3, you're missing the color Blue. > >>> > >>> > >> There are no such things as 'the primary colours', because color itself > >> is a function of the (human) eyes and brain. > >> > >> But 'human eyes' are actually specific to us as human beings and > >> therefore not 'primary'. > >> > >> What we humans regard as colour is created by three types of cells in > >> the eyes, which are receptive for certain spectra in the visible range, > >> which we humans call 'red', 'green' and 'blue'. > >> > >> With these three types of cell we can see colours in the visible part of > >> the vast range of possible em-frequencies. > >> > >> Other creatures have different eyes and can see diffent colours, > >> possibly with a different set of primary colours (for which we have no > >> names). > >> > >> TH > > > > > > I gave everybody a link so they can understand the definition of the > > word..."primary". > > > > > > The link states: > > > > definition: > > a primary color. > > > > > > > > And dis German guy sez "There are no such things as 'the primary > > colours'"! > > Look at this: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trichromacy > > Quote: > "The normal explanation of trichromacy is that the organism's retina > contains three types of color receptors (called cone cells in > vertebrates) with different absorption spectra. In actuality, the number > of such receptor types may be greater than three, since different types > may be active at different light intensities. In vertebrates with three > types of cone cells, at low light intensities the rod cells may > contribute to color vision. > > Humans and other animals that are trichromatsHumans and some other > mammals have evolved trichromacy based partly on pigments inherited from > early vertebrates. In fish and birds, for example, four pigments are > used for vision. " > > > > > Is anybody surprised? > > > > > > > > > > I cannot even ask dat German guy to name 'a primary color' since he > > tinks "There are no such things as 'primary colours'" > > > Well, you need to specify, to which kind of beings you refer with > 'primary colour'. > > Humans have three primary colours, which are called 'red, blue and green'. > > ... > > TH Are you saying Yellow is not a primary color???? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-11 20:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <67D1048F.2020@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #687346 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > Am Donnerstag000006, 06.03.2025 um 22:31 schrieb The Starmaker: > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > >> > > >> Am Donnerstag000006, 06.03.2025 um 06:35 schrieb The Starmaker: > > >> > > >>>>> Can you name the Primary Colors? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> If you ask that question to ANYBODY..they will all give you the WRONG > > >>>>> answers. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Here is the right answer: red, blue, green and yellow. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> definition: > > >>>>> pri·ma·ry a primary color. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> https://www.google.com/search?q=define+primary&oq=define+primary > > >>>> > > >>>> Not true for light: > > >>>> > > >>>> With color-picker(1), if I mix red and green, I get yellow. > > >>>> > > >>>> https://imgur.com/ZBxIObk > > >>> > > >>> Another person as inglish for a second language.. > > >>> > > >>> The Question reads: "Can you name the Primary Colors?" > > >>> > > >>> you named 3, you're missing the color Blue. > > >>> > > >>> > > >> There are no such things as 'the primary colours', because color itself > > >> is a function of the (human) eyes and brain. > > >> > > >> But 'human eyes' are actually specific to us as human beings and > > >> therefore not 'primary'. > > >> > > >> What we humans regard as colour is created by three types of cells in > > >> the eyes, which are receptive for certain spectra in the visible range, > > >> which we humans call 'red', 'green' and 'blue'. > > >> > > >> With these three types of cell we can see colours in the visible part of > > >> the vast range of possible em-frequencies. > > >> > > >> Other creatures have different eyes and can see diffent colours, > > >> possibly with a different set of primary colours (for which we have no > > >> names). > > >> > > >> TH > > > > > > > > > I gave everybody a link so they can understand the definition of the > > > word..."primary". > > > > > > > > > The link states: > > > > > > definition: > > > a primary color. > > > > > > > > > > > > And dis German guy sez "There are no such things as 'the primary > > > colours'"! > > > > Look at this: > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trichromacy > > > > Quote: > > "The normal explanation of trichromacy is that the organism's retina > > contains three types of color receptors (called cone cells in > > vertebrates) with different absorption spectra. In actuality, the number > > of such receptor types may be greater than three, since different types > > may be active at different light intensities. In vertebrates with three > > types of cone cells, at low light intensities the rod cells may > > contribute to color vision. > > > > Humans and other animals that are trichromatsHumans and some other > > mammals have evolved trichromacy based partly on pigments inherited from > > early vertebrates. In fish and birds, for example, four pigments are > > used for vision. " > > > > > > > > Is anybody surprised? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I cannot even ask dat German guy to name 'a primary color' since he > > > tinks "There are no such things as 'primary colours'" > > > > > Well, you need to specify, to which kind of beings you refer with > > 'primary colour'. > > > > Humans have three primary colours, which are called 'red, blue and green'. > > > > ... > > > > TH > > Are you saying Yellow is not a primary color???? > Since Wiki is your choice of reading true facts... Listed here is: Red is a primary color Blue is a primary color Yellow is a primary color Green is a primary color https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_symbolism -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web