Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #382077 > unrolled thread
| Started by | flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-11-24 20:15 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-11-28 06:51 +0000 |
| Articles | 9 on this page of 89 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-24 20:15 -0500
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-11-25 01:30 +0000
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:40 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-24 21:12 -0500
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-24 21:15 -0500
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:41 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-11-25 14:04 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-26 09:47 -0500
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-26 10:31 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:58 -0800
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 10:29 -0800
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 10:52 -0800
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 10:59 -0800
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-26 12:04 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 11:10 -0800
Facts about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 13:29 -0800
Re: Facts about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 15:12 -0800
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 11:07 -0800
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-26 11:32 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 11:03 -0800
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-11-25 08:37 +0100
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-25 07:55 -0500
The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... (was: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017.....) flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-25 09:35 -0500
Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-25 10:17 -0500
Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-11-25 16:42 +0100
Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-11-25 10:44 -0500
Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-11-25 18:33 +0100
Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:47 -0700
Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:46 -0700
Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-25 12:21 -0500
Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:46 -0700
Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:45 -0700
Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... (was: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017.....) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:43 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:43 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-11-28 07:19 -0600
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-28 09:07 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-11-28 10:32 -0600
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-28 09:46 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-29 09:04 -0800
Rot in Hell, Maggot! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-11-25 02:11 -0800
Re: Rot in Hell, Maggot! Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 23:46 -0800
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-11-25 06:25 -0500
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-11-25 11:42 +0000
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-11-25 07:57 -0500
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-11-25 16:15 +0000
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:40 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-11-25 18:35 -0500
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-11-26 00:47 +0000
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-11-25 20:01 -0500
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-25 17:03 -0800
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-11-27 09:13 -0500
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-11-27 17:20 +0000
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-11-27 15:22 -0500
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-11-28 08:03 -0600
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 21:48 -0700
70 known posters are "plonked" ( AutoIgnored ). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-11-25 16:38 -0800
70 posters are "Dropped" ( AutoIgnored ). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-11-25 17:27 -0800
"Noisy Kids" are limited to their 5 most recent posts, last 24 hours. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-11-25 17:34 -0800
Re: 70 known posters are "plonked" ( AutoIgnored ). Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-26 09:53 -0500
Re: 70 known posters are "plonked" ( AutoIgnored ). DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-11-27 09:53 -0500
Re: 70 known posters are "plonked" ( AutoIgnored ). Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-11-27 17:21 +0000
MrDFS's hallucinations. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-11-27 15:10 -0800
Re: MrDFS's hallucinations. flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-27 18:20 -0500
Re: MrDFS's hallucinations. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-28 09:23 -0500
Re: MrDFS's hallucinations. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-12-05 14:56 -0500
She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-05 19:51 -0800
Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-12-05 22:55 -0500
What, exactly, do you think is "weird" about me ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-05 20:39 -0800
Re: What, exactly, do you think is "weird" about me ? flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-12-05 23:43 -0500
I post whatever's on my mind, obviously. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-05 22:10 -0800
Re: What, exactly, do you think is "weird" about me ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-12-06 12:59 -0700
Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-12-07 08:15 -0500
Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-07 07:52 -0600
Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-12-07 11:15 -0500
Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 23:27 -0800
Re: I attract people like myself: male/macho. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 06:35 -0800
Re: I have no desire to hoard money and/or pay off a home loan. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 08:06 -0800
Re: She wanted more kids, I didn't. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 11:35 -0800
Re: She wanted more kids, I didn't. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 15:58 -0800
Re: We went our separate ways. flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-12-06 19:32 -0500
Re: She wanted more kids, I didn't. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 15:56 -0800
Re: Today's women can't be trusted. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 19:43 -0800
Re: Today's women can't be trusted. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 21:42 -0800
Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-06 08:57 -0800
Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-12-08 18:46 -0500
"My" kids don't miss me at all, not one bit. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-08 18:24 -0800
Re: "My" kids don't miss me at all, not one bit. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 19:00 -0800
Re: Breeders earn more, I guess. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 20:50 -0800
Re: 70 known posters are "plonked" ( AutoIgnored ). Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-11-28 06:51 +0000
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
| From | Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-06 15:56 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: She wanted more kids, I didn't. |
| Message-ID | <bd78b50a-6dbe-4398-b25b-489b81bb4f40@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #383003 |
On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 1:18:37 AM UTC+9, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > You ( Takuya Saitoh ) replied ( to me ): > > > Yes, they're mine. 1988, 4 years after our last kid, > > > we were having sex 8 times a week. > > > > She must have been a nymphomaniac, infected with > > the dopamine parasite Toxoplasma, or was it you, Jeff? > > Both of us; it takes two, right ? > > > Anyway, it was good for yo prostate > > and her psychology when it lasted.... > > > > Yet she choose the money, basic instinct > > to ensure the survival of her progeny... > > She wanted more kids, I didn't; > money was not an issue, we had plenty. Why didn't yo want more, you said to love kids? If yo can feed them why not to have more? Only in Japan we killed the kids and elderly in the past because there was not enough rice to eat, then we made Kokeshi...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-06 19:43 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Today's women can't be trusted. |
| Message-ID | <74a7f471-1d62-4083-a3aa-85ec26feb0d2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #383028 |
On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 10:10:29 AM UTC+9, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > You ( Takuya Saitoh ) replied ( to me ): > > > She wanted more kids, I didn't; > > > money was not an issue, we had plenty. > > > > Why didn't yo want more, you said to love kids? > > If yo can feed them why not to have more? > > Only in Japan we killed the kids and elderly in the past > > because there was not enough rice to eat, then we made Kokeshi... > > Food is nothing compared to schooling, housing, medical, etc. > > At the time, I wanted quality over quantity. > > Now I want no kids, zero; because I don't trust women. > Most Japanese youth feel the same way, no ? > Today's women can't be trusted. Better ask who you can actually trust? Yo can trust nobody, except yo Moi like Gohde would say...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-06 21:42 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Today's women can't be trusted. |
| Message-ID | <0df77917-52be-45ee-92bd-700f4a87f472@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #383028 |
On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 10:10:29 AM UTC+9, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > You ( Takuya Saitoh ) replied ( to me ): > > > She wanted more kids, I didn't; > > > money was not an issue, we had plenty. > > > > Why didn't yo want more, you said to love kids? > > If yo can feed them why not to have more? > > Only in Japan we killed the kids and elderly in the past > > because there was not enough rice to eat, then we made Kokeshi... > > Food is nothing compared to schooling, housing, medical, etc. > > At the time, I wanted quality over quantity. > > Now I want no kids, zero; because I don't trust women. > Most Japanese youth feel the same way, no ? > Today's women can't be trusted. The best way to deal with women is to predict their behavior and adapt to it. Far better than trusting them on anything.... Women behavior and fidelity depends on the 28d lunar cycle.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-06 08:57 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. |
| Message-ID | <5846EDE4.4954@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #382975 |
you got it backwards. She is not suppose to pursue you, you are suppose to pursue her. You get a club you hit her over the head.. you take her home.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-08 18:46 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. |
| Message-ID | <o2cr9h$uh3$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #382975 |
On 12/5/2016 10:51 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > I add to the code ( X.CPP ) from time to time. > One of the lesser changes I made 9 days ago: > > http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Diff.PNG > [ Red is the old code, Green is the new stuff ] Why do you code the way you do? It's like nothing else I've ever seen. Ever. >>> But I could sue you for libel ( I'm not a felon ). >> >> You'll have a heck of a time proving I knew you weren't a felon >> ( I figured you were, given your past posts about child support >> and not seeing your children ). > > No felony. My ex divorced me to marry her lover. > She cried when I told her I'd stop paying Child Support; > I cried when I lost "my" kids. That was that, thee end. That's a crappy ending for your children and you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-08 18:24 -0800 |
| Subject | "My" kids don't miss me at all, not one bit. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Dec.8--6.24P.Seattle.2016> |
| In reply to | #383330 |
You ( Mr. DFS ) replied ( to me ): > > No felony. My ex divorced me to marry her lover. > > She cried when I told her I'd stop paying Child Support; > > I cried when I lost "my" kids. That was that, thee end. > > That's a crappy ending for your children and you. No, not at all, everyone got what they wanted. Her new husband is very nice/rich/Mormon. They live high on the mountain, in a snooty neighborhood, with fancy cars, vacations, etc. Hard Fact: "My" kids don't miss me at all, not one bit. While I'm poor by society's standards, I feel quite rich. > > I add to the code ( X.CPP ) from time to time. > > One of the lesser changes I made 9 days ago: > > > > http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Diff.PNG > > [ Red is the old code, Green is the new stuff ] > > Why do you code the way you do ? > It's like nothing else I've ever seen. Ever. It's what works best for me. I love macros, e.g. LoopXx(). I enjoy long lines, 236 columns.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-08 19:00 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: "My" kids don't miss me at all, not one bit. |
| Message-ID | <3b6dbf16-8bd5-4945-8e68-4bdd6e59d542@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #383352 |
On Friday, December 9, 2016 at 11:24:36 AM UTC+9, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > You ( Mr. DFS ) replied ( to me ): > > > No felony. My ex divorced me to marry her lover. > > > She cried when I told her I'd stop paying Child Support; > > > I cried when I lost "my" kids. That was that, thee end. > > > > That's a crappy ending for your children and you. > > No, not at all, everyone got what they wanted. > > Her new husband is very nice/rich/Mormon. > They live high on the mountain, in a snooty neighborhood, > with fancy cars, vacations, etc. How do the Mormons get rich? Are the religious masses paying them fortune? Here in Japan, if yo register as religious cult, you exempt from paying any taxes! > Hard Fact: "My" kids don't miss me at all, not one bit. > > While I'm poor by society's standards, I feel quite rich. > > > > I add to the code ( X.CPP ) from time to time. > > > One of the lesser changes I made 9 days ago: > > > > > > http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Diff.PNG > > > [ Red is the old code, Green is the new stuff ] > > > > Why do you code the way you do ? > > It's like nothing else I've ever seen. Ever. > > It's what works best for me. > I love macros, e.g. LoopXx(). > I enjoy long lines, 236 columns.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-08 20:50 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Breeders earn more, I guess. |
| Message-ID | <963bb016-603e-42f9-bf43-0e941fb28d55@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #383356 |
On Friday, December 9, 2016 at 12:35:02 PM UTC+9, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > You ( Takuya Saitoh ) replied ( to me ): > > How do the Mormons get rich? > > Are the religious masses paying them fortune? > > Here in Japan, if yo register as religious cult, > > you exempt from paying any taxes! > > Mormons pay taxes, just like everyone else; > further, they give money to the Church. > > Breeders earn more, I guess. > My ex is richer than most Mormons. Because she chose the right guy and gave him what he needed (good sex). Same as with Melania who made it from immigrant whore to the president of the World...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sandman <mr@sandman.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-28 06:51 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: 70 known posters are "plonked" ( AutoIgnored ). |
| Message-ID | <sandman-b550bda489724068be6669ef92296171@individual.net> |
| In reply to | #382251 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <o1ervp$pvh$6@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote: > > Here, in "Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy", I read posts from > > just 6 Regular Posters, two of which are "Noisy Kids" > > who mostly fling insults. > > > I also read posts from 40 "Visitors/NymShifters". > > 70 known posters are "plonked" ( AutoIgnored ); to wit: > > > http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Cola_Regs.HTM > > Why am I +Trusted? > I really believe your Circle of +Trusted should also include Slimer, > owl, GreyCloud, flattie, Melzzzzz, the raging but focused asshole > known as Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks, Marti van Lin, DeskRabbit, Steve > Carroll (non-Snit posts), Kohlmann (non-Snit posts), Tattoo Vampire > and Sandman. Nah, I handed him his ass when it came to HTML validation/specification a few years back and he could never let go :) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYO9PaAAoJECFEwfBaA+jRA/oIAM7U9O1T9T5xyewA2UP9oS7u TBPI+A9PMQn3y+zHHvKZTVjd0l/6n1vN971emf6lLtCD2K0aWiUMUMQfrF5mFjMJ Y6inztGgSTGbR31e8udoZw/zOnCAYDiTGM7K/f7IHLjj0ac1hnH7dvwTv3SChTFA WbcadJvQ8o4K2e5QSmXWEHA9ajeeWm6Hj6H7Yc86hiB6XoW2OTS1rvz+wGkDEwZW xH7VPT/3+yQCij7ZvffhWj/MQMPBB26LzKqepbgt4JNKlHyoeCC7Aqz6JYn8GZxF oXF/cx1xh8FQHs8mVON4toGGRZJOlXHFbSedKJ+MzUISsjI1++vhU284+9Vh/+4= =aXI8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sandman
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web