Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366024 > unrolled thread

Help With Pan Anomaly

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Help With Pan Anomaly Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-19 00:47 +0000
    Re: Help With Pan Anomaly Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-19 01:02 +0000
      Re: Help With Pan Anomaly "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-19 01:43 +0000
      Re: Help With Pan Anomaly Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 19:01 -0700
      Re: Help With Pan Anomaly Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-08-19 15:06 +0100
        Re: Help With Pan Anomaly fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 10:15 -0700
          Re: Help With Pan Anomaly DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-19 15:39 -0400
            Re: Help With Pan Anomaly Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-19 22:28 +0000
              Re: Help With Pan Anomaly DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-19 18:31 -0400
          Re: Help With Pan Anomaly GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-19 13:40 -0600
          Re: Help With Pan Anomaly Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-08-22 14:53 +0100
            Re: Help With Pan Anomaly fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-08-22 09:06 -0700
              Re: Google and CraigsList think I'm a "bot". The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-23 09:08 -0700
              Re: Can you tweak Windows 10 like this ( bellow ) ? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-26 19:50 +0000
    Re: Help With Pan Anomaly "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-19 01:36 +0000

#366024 — Help With Pan Anomaly

OK, Linux advocates.  Prove your worth.

I keep getting a strange warning when running Pan,
which is, by the way, the very best newsreader anywhere.

(Sorry, Microshit chumps.  Pan is not OFFICIALLY available
for that junk OS.)

Pan emits this warning whenever I open a window for message
editing:

pan: WARNING **: Error loading plugin: libhunspell-1.3.so.0:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Why this warning?

Pan itself does not require hunspell.  Pan is compiled
with gtkspell.

However, gtkspell requires enchant, which in turn requires
hunspell.

But the hunspell version on my system is libhunspell-1.4.so.0.

So why is Pan spewing this message about libhunspell-1.3.so.0
which nothing should ever be calling?

So come on Linux advocates.  Prove your worth and solve
this puzzle.

My configuration parameters for Pan are as follows:

./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-gtkspell --disable-nls --with-dbus=no

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#366026

On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:47:23 +0000, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote:

> OK, Linux advocates.  Prove your worth.
> 

None of the Linux deadbeats on this group will ever
solve the problem.

Fortunately, Gentoo Linux came to the rescue.

Gentoo has a utility called revdep-rebuild, which helps
in untangling the dependency thicket.  On my system,
revdep-rebuild revealed that enchant has unresolved
dependencies and needed to be rebuilt.  That fixed the
problem.

Gentoo is, by far, the best Linux distro.  Gentoo is
the only distro worthy of being called a Linux distro.

But the candy-ass deadbeats on this NG prefer Hannah Montana.

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366029

Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:47:23 +0000, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote:
> 
>> OK, Linux advocates.  Prove your worth.
>> 
> 
> None of the Linux deadbeats on this group will ever
> solve the problem.
> 
> Fortunately, Gentoo Linux came to the rescue.
> 
> Gentoo has a utility called revdep-rebuild, which helps
> in untangling the dependency thicket.

You're welcome.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366032

On 8/18/16, 6:02 PM, in article np5lrl02vof@news3.newsguy.com, "Adlbifhr
Mjduhgfks" <am@random.us> wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:47:23 +0000, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote:
> 
>> OK, Linux advocates.  Prove your worth.
>> 
> 
> None of the Linux deadbeats on this group will ever
> solve the problem.
> 
> Fortunately, Gentoo Linux came to the rescue.
> 
> Gentoo has a utility called revdep-rebuild, which helps
> in untangling the dependency thicket.  On my system,
> revdep-rebuild revealed that enchant has unresolved
> dependencies and needed to be rebuilt.  That fixed the
> problem.

There are no dependency problems on Linux. You must have made that up. :)

> Gentoo is, by far, the best Linux distro.  Gentoo is
> the only distro worthy of being called a Linux distro.
> 
> But the candy-ass deadbeats on this NG prefer Hannah Montana.
> 
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
> 



-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366047

On 19/08/2016 02:02, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:47:23 +0000, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote:
>
>> OK, Linux advocates.  Prove your worth.
>>
>
> None of the Linux deadbeats on this group will ever
> solve the problem.
>
> Fortunately, Gentoo Linux came to the rescue.
>
> Gentoo has a utility called revdep-rebuild, which helps
> in untangling the dependency thicket.  On my system,
> revdep-rebuild revealed that enchant has unresolved
> dependencies and needed to be rebuilt.  That fixed the
> problem.
>
> Gentoo is, by far, the best Linux distro.  Gentoo is
> the only distro worthy of being called a Linux distro.
>
> But the candy-ass deadbeats on this NG prefer Hannah Montana.
>
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>

Having fun fucking about with your operating system whilst the rest of 
us are earning $$ or relaxing?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366056

On Friday, August 19, 2016 at 10:06:45 AM UTC-4, Desk Rabbit wrote:

> 
> Having fun fucking about with your operating system whilst the rest of 
> us are earning $$ or relaxing?
>

Well, you have no qualms about taking precious time away from
your earning/relaxing activities to post your critical drivel
to C.O.L.A.

Furthermore, for you it is a SIGNIFICANT amount of time because
you must precede each and every post with a frantic Internet search
to fill in the tremendous voids of your knowledge and expertise.

For example, you had never before known of par2cmdline or par2tbb
and had to query Google for sufficient background information to
allow you to construct a response.  Think of how many beers you could
have quaffed in that same amount of time.

Obviously, your repetitive rants about GNU/Linux as a waste of time
are pure bluster because YOU are the most experienced in the art of
useless temporizing.

You come to C.O.L.A. because you believe that you can get away
with your subterfuge, but not all are so easily fooled.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366067

On 8/19/2016 1:15 PM, fr314159@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, August 19, 2016 at 10:06:45 AM UTC-4, Desk Rabbit wrote:
>
>>
>> Having fun fucking about with your operating system whilst the rest of
>> us are earning $$ or relaxing?
>>
>
> Well, you have no qualms about taking precious time away from
> your earning/relaxing activities to post your critical drivel
> to C.O.L.A.
>
> Furthermore, for you it is a SIGNIFICANT amount of time because
> you must precede each and every post with a frantic Internet search
> to fill in the tremendous voids of your knowledge and expertise.
>
> For example, you had never before known of par2cmdline or par2tbb
> and had to query Google for sufficient background information to
> allow you to construct a response.  Think of how many beers you could
> have quaffed in that same amount of time.
>
> Obviously, your repetitive rants about GNU/Linux as a waste of time
> are pure bluster because YOU are the most experienced in the art of
> useless temporizing.
>
> You come to C.O.L.A. because you believe that you can get away
> with your subterfuge, but not all are so easily fooled.


That's rich.  It's YOU, Feeb, who thinks he's saying something important 
with your ignorant, repetitive drools about 'Try that with Microshit 
Windows' and 'Can't do that with Windows'.  You're almost always wrong.

Most of the Linux idiots here have done the same thing.  I shut them ALL 
down.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366086

On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 15:39:02 -0400, DFS wrote:

> 
> That's rich... [snip worthless jibber jabber]
>

What's it to YOU?

In case you hadn't noticed, I was not responding to YOUR
dumb-fuck ass.  I was responding to this OTHER dumb-fuck
ass.

So butt out.  Do you think you have some special entitlement
to stick your fatuous nose wherever you please?  You're worse
than an old woman busybody.  Let this OTHER dumb-fuck asshole
fight his own battles.  I don't recall him asking for assistance.

No one wants to hear your utterly lame pronouncements.  You have
demonstrated time and time again your intellectual inferiority.

So beat it.  Scram.  Vamoose.

Fucking Microshit loser.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366088

On 8/19/2016 6:28 PM, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 15:39:02 -0400, DFS wrote:
>
>>
>> That's rich... [snip worthless jibber jabber]
>>
>
> What's it to YOU?
>
> In case you hadn't noticed, I was not responding to YOUR
> dumb-fuck ass.  I was responding to this OTHER dumb-fuck
> ass.
>
> So butt out.  Do you think you have some special entitlement
> to stick your fatuous nose wherever you please?  You're worse
> than an old woman busybody.  Let this OTHER dumb-fuck asshole
> fight his own battles.  I don't recall him asking for assistance.
>
> No one wants to hear your utterly lame pronouncements.  You have
> demonstrated time and time again your intellectual inferiority.
>
> So beat it.  Scram.  Vamoose.
>
> Fucking Microshit loser.


I see I hit a sore spot, Feeb: you can't stand that your stupid 'only 
GuhNoo' idiocy doesn't stand up to scrutiny.

Get it right, or get out.  You heah?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366069

On 08/19/16 11:15, fr314159@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, August 19, 2016 at 10:06:45 AM UTC-4, Desk Rabbit wrote:
>
>>
>> Having fun fucking about with your operating system whilst the rest of
>> us are earning $$ or relaxing?
>>
>
> Well, you have no qualms about taking precious time away from
> your earning/relaxing activities to post your critical drivel
> to C.O.L.A.
>
> Furthermore, for you it is a SIGNIFICANT amount of time because
> you must precede each and every post with a frantic Internet search
> to fill in the tremendous voids of your knowledge and expertise.
>
> For example, you had never before known of par2cmdline or par2tbb
> and had to query Google for sufficient background information to
> allow you to construct a response.  Think of how many beers you could
> have quaffed in that same amount of time.
>
> Obviously, your repetitive rants about GNU/Linux as a waste of time
> are pure bluster because YOU are the most experienced in the art of
> useless temporizing.
>
> You come to C.O.L.A. because you believe that you can get away
> with your subterfuge, but not all are so easily fooled.
>
>
Says Frog #314159.

"Hey fred, I've got the scalpel ready."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366245

On 19/08/2016 18:15, fr314159@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, August 19, 2016 at 10:06:45 AM UTC-4, Desk Rabbit wrote:
>
>>
>> Having fun fucking about with your operating system whilst the rest of
>> us are earning $$ or relaxing?
>>
>
> Well, you have no qualms about taking precious time away from
> your earning/relaxing activities to post your critical drivel
> to C.O.L.A.
>
> Furthermore, for you it is a SIGNIFICANT amount of time because
> you must precede each and every post with a frantic Internet search
> to fill in the tremendous voids of your knowledge and expertise.
>
> For example, you had never before known of par2cmdline or par2tbb
> and had to query Google for sufficient background information to
> allow you to construct a response.  Think of how many beers you could
> have quaffed in that same amount of time.
>
> Obviously, your repetitive rants about GNU/Linux as a waste of time
> are pure bluster because YOU are the most experienced in the art of
> useless temporizing.
>
> You come to C.O.L.A. because you believe that you can get away
> with your subterfuge, but not all are so easily fooled.
>
>

My apologies for the late response but I'd been at two parties over the 
weekend, the last one finished at 4am with a bunch of great musicians 
just jamming into the early hours, I then had a great day with family, 
spent more time this morning with my daughter and just came into work 
this afternoon to do a bit of catching up.

I can't remember what your rant was about and I don't really care any 
more as I'm totally chilled and no doubt you were just ranting about 
some stupid GNU nonsense that you claim can't be done under Windows only 
to be proven utterly wrong again.

The safe bet is to assume that whatever you say is complete nonsense 
because 99.99999% of the time it is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366260

On Monday, August 22, 2016 at 9:53:41 AM UTC-4, Desk Rabbit wrote:

> 
> I can't remember ... 
>

Feigning amnesia is a womanish tactic.

Which operating system do women prefer?  It is Microshit Windows
all the way.

GNU/Linux doesn't attract pussies.

Could there ever be a better portrait of superiority?

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

GNU/Linux.  For REAL men, of REAL men, and by REAL men -- only.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366353 — Re: Google and CraigsList think I'm a "bot".

Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> 
> MsStarmaker wrote:
> > For example...i do a harmless search and i get this from Google:
> > " Our systems have detected unusual traffic from your computer network.
> >   Please try your request again later. "  Why did this happen ?
> 
> It happens to me too.
> CraigsList recently banned "me" ( my IP address ) for 24 hours.
> 
> Thirty or so people are using "my" IP address;
> so Google and CraigsList think I'm a "bot".
> 
> An IP address is _not_ a person.


If Google thinks you are a bot, how could they be wrong? Maybe you are a bot.

Is Jeff-Relf.Me a person, or a computer simulation of a person? Cause there is all kinds of strange
persons with strange names inside my computer. Are they persons, bots or computer simulated persons?

And what are they doing in my computer????

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#367126 — Re: Can you tweak Windows 10 like this ( bellow ) ?

Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> writes:

>Subject: Re: Can you tweak Windows 10 like this ( bellow ) ?
                                                   ^^^^^^

>Can you tweak Windows 10 like this ( bellow ) ?
                                      ^^^^^^

Is Relf the reincarnation of He Whose Name Shall Not Be Mentioned?

(if so, we're all doomed.... HWNSNBM with actual, but misguided 
intelligence?)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366028

Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> wrote:
> OK, Linux advocates.  Prove your worth.
> 
> I keep getting a strange warning when running Pan,
> which is, by the way, the very best newsreader anywhere.
> 
> (Sorry, Microshit chumps.  Pan is not OFFICIALLY available
> for that junk OS.)
> 
> Pan emits this warning whenever I open a window for message
> editing:
> 
> pan: WARNING **: Error loading plugin: libhunspell-1.3.so.0:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> 
> Why this warning?
> 
> Pan itself does not require hunspell.  Pan is compiled
> with gtkspell.
> 
> However, gtkspell requires enchant, which in turn requires
> hunspell.
> 
> But the hunspell version on my system is libhunspell-1.4.so.0.
> 
> So why is Pan spewing this message about libhunspell-1.3.so.0
> which nothing should ever be calling?
> 
> So come on Linux advocates.  Prove your worth and solve
> this puzzle.
> 
> My configuration parameters for Pan are as follows:
> 
> ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-gtkspell --disable-nls --with-dbus=no
> 

Try revdep-rebuild, tard.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web