Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #340173 > unrolled thread

DooFuS is Running Windows XP

Started byJohn Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com>
First post2016-01-09 05:44 -0800
Last post2016-01-10 16:24 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 37 — 8 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  DooFuS is Running Windows XP John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 05:44 -0800
    Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-09 16:44 -0500
      Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-09 21:54 +0000
        Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-09 17:29 -0500
          Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 14:37 -0800
          Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-09 22:53 +0000
        Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-09 17:44 -0500
          Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 14:47 -0800
          Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-09 23:08 +0000
            Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-10 17:03 -0500
              Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-01-11 00:04 +0100
              Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-10 23:17 +0000
          Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-10 10:24 -0500
            Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-10 16:48 +0100
              Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-10 11:28 -0500
                Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-10 18:12 +0100
                  Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-10 12:27 -0500
                    Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-10 18:34 +0100
                      Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-10 19:40 -0500
              Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-10 14:04 -0500
      Poor Stupid DooFuS is too dumb to even use a telephone John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 14:43 -0800
        Re: Poor Stupid DooFuS is too dumb to even use a telephone DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-09 17:46 -0500
          Re: Poor Stupid DooFuS is too dumb to even use a telephone John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 14:51 -0800
            Re: Poor Stupid DooFuS is too dumb to even use a telephone owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-09 23:40 +0000
    Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-01-09 22:24 +0000
      Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 14:38 -0800
      Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-09 23:21 +0000
        Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-01-09 23:40 +0000
          Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-09 23:47 +0000
            Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-01-10 00:05 +0000
              Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-10 00:14 +0000
                Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-01-10 16:22 +0000
                  Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-10 20:38 +0000
              Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-10 10:32 -0500
            Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-10 10:30 -0500
              Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-01-10 16:18 +0000
                Re: DooFuS is Running Windows XP Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-01-10 16:24 +0000

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#340173 — DooFuS is Running Windows XP

FromJohn Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-09 05:44 -0800
SubjectDooFuS is Running Windows XP
Message-ID<cf60f055-6720-41dc-9197-5d66de9ac364@googlegroups.com>
On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 11:04:51 PM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/zgbgbq3
> On 1/8/2016 12:35 PM, Slimer wrote:
> > On 2016-01-08 11:38 AM, DFS wrote:
> >> On 1/7/2016 10:29 PM, John Gohde wrote:
> >>
> >>> A very impressive list of software coming from a well known @#$%^&*
> >>>
> >>> Too bad the picture of your desktop does NOT remotely support your
> >>> fantasy.
> >>>
> >>> Moi told you so - LOL.
> >>
> >>
> >> You're too stupid for words, GodHesBroke.  You think every installed app
> >> has to be on the taskbar or desktop.
> >>
> >> my start menu: http://i.imgur.com/NZjh3S6.jpg
> >>
> >> my desktop:    http://i.imgur.com/GiqeC25.jpg
> >
> > Is that XP?
> 
> 
> It's my old system:
> 
> WinServer 2003 Standard, P4 300GHz chip, 2GB memory, Radeon 9600 video
> 
> As I mentioned in the post the other day, the Radeon 5770 video card in 
> my main system died.  I'm using this old computer until I get a new 
> graphics card.



Lookie, Stupid DooFuS publicly admits to using Windows XP.

Poor Stupid DooFuS his crap graphic card gave out and he has no more. Perhaps, the fool should go to his local Goodwill Computer Store?  What is the matter Stupid DooFuS, never heard of using the Internet along with overnight FedEx?

Poor Stupid DooFuS is too broke to buy a new graphics card.

Do you want Moi to buy you one and send it to you by FedEx?

Yeah, your new name is Stupid DooFuS.
--
Je suis Moi, Ubuntu/Linux DE

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#340189

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2016-01-09 16:44 -0500
Message-ID<n6rus8$eup$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#340173
On 1/9/2016 8:44 AM, John Gohde wrote:
> On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 11:04:51 PM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
> http://tinyurl.com/zgbgbq3
>> On 1/8/2016 12:35 PM, Slimer wrote:
>>> On 2016-01-08 11:38 AM, DFS wrote:
>>>> On 1/7/2016 10:29 PM, John Gohde wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> A very impressive list of software coming from a well known
>>>>> @#$%^&*
>>>>>
>>>>> Too bad the picture of your desktop does NOT remotely support
>>>>> your fantasy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Moi told you so - LOL.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're too stupid for words, GodHesBroke.  You think every
>>>> installed app has to be on the taskbar or desktop.
>>>>
>>>> my start menu: http://i.imgur.com/NZjh3S6.jpg
>>>>
>>>> my desktop:    http://i.imgur.com/GiqeC25.jpg
>>>
>>> Is that XP?
>>
>>
>> It's my old system:
>>
>> WinServer 2003 Standard, P4 300GHz chip, 2GB memory, Radeon 9600
>> video
>>
>> As I mentioned in the post the other day, the Radeon 5770 video
>> card in my main system died.  I'm using this old computer until I
>> get a new graphics card.
>
>
>
> Lookie, Stupid DooFuS publicly admits to using Windows XP.


Where did I admit to that, dumbshit?



> Poor Stupid DooFuS his crap graphic card gave out and he has no more.
>  Perhaps, the fool should go to his local Goodwill Computer Store?

If you knew what you were talking about, you'd know it was a decent 
video card for its time: HIS Radeon HD 5770, DirectX 11 compatible, 
128-bit interface, 1GB video memory, PCI Express 2.0 x16, low power 
consumption at load.  I paid $163 for it in early 2010, and used ones 
today still sell for $100+.



> What is the matter Stupid DooFuS, never heard of using the Internet

Once the card died I couldn't use the Internet, fool.  So I had to break 
out this old system.


> along with overnight FedEx?

overnight?  I'm too smart to waste money like that in a
non-critical situation.  Why is it broke people like you ALWAYS make bad 
financial decisions?



> Poor Stupid DooFuS is too broke to buy a new graphics card.

I'm too smart to buy an expensive graphics card I don't need.



> Do you want Moi to buy you one and send it to you by FedEx?

Sure.  From a good online friend like you, I'll accept only a brand new, 
in the box, EVGA GeForce Titan X SuperClock.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814487130

Let me know when you've purchased it (post a pic of you holding the 
sealed box, and a pic of the receipt), and I'll let you know where to 
send it.

Thanks in advance, GodHeLies!



> Yeah, your new name is Stupid DooFuS. -- Je suis Moi, Ubuntu/Linux
> DE

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#340191

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2016-01-09 21:54 +0000
Message-ID<ghvnbmd9384.pfe@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#340189
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 1/9/2016 8:44 AM, John Gohde wrote:
>> On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 11:04:51 PM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
>> http://tinyurl.com/zgbgbq3
>>> On 1/8/2016 12:35 PM, Slimer wrote:
>>>> On 2016-01-08 11:38 AM, DFS wrote:
>>>>> On 1/7/2016 10:29 PM, John Gohde wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> A very impressive list of software coming from a well known
>>>>>> @#$%^&*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Too bad the picture of your desktop does NOT remotely support
>>>>>> your fantasy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Moi told you so - LOL.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You're too stupid for words, GodHesBroke.  You think every
>>>>> installed app has to be on the taskbar or desktop.
>>>>>
>>>>> my start menu: http://i.imgur.com/NZjh3S6.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> my desktop:    http://i.imgur.com/GiqeC25.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Is that XP?
>>>
>>>
>>> It's my old system:
>>>
>>> WinServer 2003 Standard, P4 300GHz chip, 2GB memory, Radeon 9600
>>> video
>>>
>>> As I mentioned in the post the other day, the Radeon 5770 video
>>> card in my main system died.  I'm using this old computer until I
>>> get a new graphics card.
>>
>>
>>
>> Lookie, Stupid DooFuS publicly admits to using Windows XP.
> 
> 
> Where did I admit to that, dumbshit?
> 

Server 2003 is XP.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#340197

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2016-01-09 17:29 -0500
Message-ID<n6s1gh$h68$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#340191
On 1/9/2016 4:54 PM, owl wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>> On 1/9/2016 8:44 AM, John Gohde wrote:
>>> On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 11:04:51 PM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
>>> http://tinyurl.com/zgbgbq3
>>>> On 1/8/2016 12:35 PM, Slimer wrote:
>>>>> On 2016-01-08 11:38 AM, DFS wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/7/2016 10:29 PM, John Gohde wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A very impressive list of software coming from a well known
>>>>>>> @#$%^&*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Too bad the picture of your desktop does NOT remotely support
>>>>>>> your fantasy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Moi told you so - LOL.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're too stupid for words, GodHesBroke.  You think every
>>>>>> installed app has to be on the taskbar or desktop.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> my start menu: http://i.imgur.com/NZjh3S6.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> my desktop:    http://i.imgur.com/GiqeC25.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that XP?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's my old system:
>>>>
>>>> WinServer 2003 Standard, P4 300GHz chip, 2GB memory, Radeon 9600
>>>> video
>>>>
>>>> As I mentioned in the post the other day, the Radeon 5770 video
>>>> card in my main system died.  I'm using this old computer until I
>>>> get a new graphics card.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Lookie, Stupid DooFuS publicly admits to using Windows XP.
>>
>>
>> Where did I admit to that, dumbshit?
>>
>
> Server 2003 is XP.


owl is idiot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#340201

FromJohn Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-09 14:37 -0800
Message-ID<0fb003db-8af5-411b-9252-387cb2178d7a@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#340197
On Saturday, January 9, 2016 at 5:30:13 PM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
> On 1/9/2016 4:54 PM, owl wrote:
> > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> >> On 1/9/2016 8:44 AM, John Gohde wrote:
> >>> On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 11:04:51 PM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
> >>> http://tinyurl.com/zgbgbq3
> >>>> On 1/8/2016 12:35 PM, Slimer wrote:
> >>>>> On 2016-01-08 11:38 AM, DFS wrote:
> >>>>>> On 1/7/2016 10:29 PM, John Gohde wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> A very impressive list of software coming from a well known
> >>>>>>> @#$%^&*
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Too bad the picture of your desktop does NOT remotely support
> >>>>>>> your fantasy.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Moi told you so - LOL.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You're too stupid for words, GodHesBroke.  You think every
> >>>>>> installed app has to be on the taskbar or desktop.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> my start menu: http://i.imgur.com/NZjh3S6.jpg
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> my desktop:    http://i.imgur.com/GiqeC25.jpg
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is that XP?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> It's my old system:
> >>>>
> >>>> WinServer 2003 Standard, P4 300GHz chip, 2GB memory, Radeon 9600
> >>>> video
> >>>>
> >>>> As I mentioned in the post the other day, the Radeon 5770 video
> >>>> card in my main system died.  I'm using this old computer until I
> >>>> get a new graphics card.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Lookie, Stupid DooFuS publicly admits to using Windows XP.
> >>
> >>
> >> Where did I admit to that, dumbshit?
> >>
> >
> > Server 2003 is XP.
> 
> 
> owl is idiot.


Stupid DooFuS just loves his XP.

Cheers ...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#340210

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2016-01-09 22:53 +0000
Message-ID<thgjdi93.jgia@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#340197
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 1/9/2016 4:54 PM, owl wrote:
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>> On 1/9/2016 8:44 AM, John Gohde wrote:
>>>> On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 11:04:51 PM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/zgbgbq3
>>>>> On 1/8/2016 12:35 PM, Slimer wrote:
>>>>>> On 2016-01-08 11:38 AM, DFS wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/7/2016 10:29 PM, John Gohde wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A very impressive list of software coming from a well known
>>>>>>>> @#$%^&*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Too bad the picture of your desktop does NOT remotely support
>>>>>>>> your fantasy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Moi told you so - LOL.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're too stupid for words, GodHesBroke.  You think every
>>>>>>> installed app has to be on the taskbar or desktop.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> my start menu: http://i.imgur.com/NZjh3S6.jpg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> my desktop:    http://i.imgur.com/GiqeC25.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is that XP?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It's my old system:
>>>>>
>>>>> WinServer 2003 Standard, P4 300GHz chip, 2GB memory, Radeon 9600
>>>>> video
>>>>>
>>>>> As I mentioned in the post the other day, the Radeon 5770 video
>>>>> card in my main system died.  I'm using this old computer until I
>>>>> get a new graphics card.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Lookie, Stupid DooFuS publicly admits to using Windows XP.
>>>
>>>
>>> Where did I admit to that, dumbshit?
>>>
>>
>> Server 2003 is XP.
> 
> 
> owl is idiot.
> 

XP 64-bit == NT 5.2
Server 2003 == NT 5.2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_XP_Professional_x64_Edition
<quote>
Windows XP Professional x64 Edition uses the same kernel and code tree
as Windows Server 2003[3] and is serviced by the same service pack.[4]
</quote>

This duality has been true of all Windows workstation/server OSes from the
dawn of time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_NT

There you will see that
Server 2016 (when released) == Windows 10
Server 2012 R2 == Windows 8.1
Server 2012 == Windows 8
Server 2008 R2 == Windows 7
Server 2008 == Windows Vista
etc., all the way back to Windows NT 3.1 (Workstation)/Advanced Server

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#340206

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2016-01-09 17:44 -0500
Message-ID<n6s2di$om8$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#340191
On 1/9/2016 4:54 PM, owl wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>> On 1/9/2016 8:44 AM, John Gohde wrote:
>>> On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 11:04:51 PM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
>>> http://tinyurl.com/zgbgbq3
>>>> On 1/8/2016 12:35 PM, Slimer wrote:
>>>>> On 2016-01-08 11:38 AM, DFS wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/7/2016 10:29 PM, John Gohde wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A very impressive list of software coming from a well known
>>>>>>> @#$%^&*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Too bad the picture of your desktop does NOT remotely support
>>>>>>> your fantasy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Moi told you so - LOL.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're too stupid for words, GodHesBroke.  You think every
>>>>>> installed app has to be on the taskbar or desktop.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> my start menu: http://i.imgur.com/NZjh3S6.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> my desktop:    http://i.imgur.com/GiqeC25.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that XP?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's my old system:
>>>>
>>>> WinServer 2003 Standard, P4 300GHz chip, 2GB memory, Radeon 9600
>>>> video
>>>>
>>>> As I mentioned in the post the other day, the Radeon 5770 video
>>>> card in my main system died.  I'm using this old computer until I
>>>> get a new graphics card.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Lookie, Stupid DooFuS publicly admits to using Windows XP.
>>
>>
>> Where did I admit to that, dumbshit?
>>
>
> Server 2003 is XP.


Which version of XP would run 1TB of RAM?

Don't let me down, fella.  Be all the Linux idiot you can be.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#340208

FromJohn Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-09 14:47 -0800
Message-ID<c2e7c298-fa64-48a6-968c-636f77f06bf0@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#340206
On Saturday, January 9, 2016 at 5:45:42 PM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
> On 1/9/2016 4:54 PM, owl wrote:
> > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> >> On 1/9/2016 8:44 AM, John Gohde wrote:
> >>> On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 11:04:51 PM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
> >>> http://tinyurl.com/zgbgbq3
> >>>> On 1/8/2016 12:35 PM, Slimer wrote:
> >>>>> On 2016-01-08 11:38 AM, DFS wrote:
> >>>>>> On 1/7/2016 10:29 PM, John Gohde wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> A very impressive list of software coming from a well known
> >>>>>>> @#$%^&*
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Too bad the picture of your desktop does NOT remotely support
> >>>>>>> your fantasy.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Moi told you so - LOL.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You're too stupid for words, GodHesBroke.  You think every
> >>>>>> installed app has to be on the taskbar or desktop.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> my start menu: http://i.imgur.com/NZjh3S6.jpg
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> my desktop:    http://i.imgur.com/GiqeC25.jpg
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is that XP?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> It's my old system:
> >>>>
> >>>> WinServer 2003 Standard, P4 300GHz chip, 2GB memory, Radeon 9600
> >>>> video
> >>>>
> >>>> As I mentioned in the post the other day, the Radeon 5770 video
> >>>> card in my main system died.  I'm using this old computer until I
> >>>> get a new graphics card.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Lookie, Stupid DooFuS publicly admits to using Windows XP.
> >>
> >>
> >> Where did I admit to that, dumbshit?
> >>
> >
> > Server 2003 is XP.
> 
> 
> Which version of XP would run 1TB of RAM?


Ooooh!  How far does that RAM take you without a graphics card, Stupid DooFuS?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#340211

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2016-01-09 23:08 +0000
Message-ID<ghjdsue92.af0a3w@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#340206
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 1/9/2016 4:54 PM, owl wrote:
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>> On 1/9/2016 8:44 AM, John Gohde wrote:
>>>> On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 11:04:51 PM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/zgbgbq3
>>>>> On 1/8/2016 12:35 PM, Slimer wrote:
>>>>>> On 2016-01-08 11:38 AM, DFS wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/7/2016 10:29 PM, John Gohde wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A very impressive list of software coming from a well known
>>>>>>>> @#$%^&*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Too bad the picture of your desktop does NOT remotely support
>>>>>>>> your fantasy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Moi told you so - LOL.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're too stupid for words, GodHesBroke.  You think every
>>>>>>> installed app has to be on the taskbar or desktop.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> my start menu: http://i.imgur.com/NZjh3S6.jpg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> my desktop:    http://i.imgur.com/GiqeC25.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is that XP?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It's my old system:
>>>>>
>>>>> WinServer 2003 Standard, P4 300GHz chip, 2GB memory, Radeon 9600
>>>>> video
>>>>>
>>>>> As I mentioned in the post the other day, the Radeon 5770 video
>>>>> card in my main system died.  I'm using this old computer until I
>>>>> get a new graphics card.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Lookie, Stupid DooFuS publicly admits to using Windows XP.
>>>
>>>
>>> Where did I admit to that, dumbshit?
>>>
>>
>> Server 2003 is XP.
> 
> 
> Which version of XP would run 1TB of RAM?
> 
> Don't let me down, fella.  Be all the Linux idiot you can be.
> 
 
XP is artificially throttled.  So what?  It's the same kernel.
Just like your Server 2003 Standard Edition is artificially
throttled to 32 GB on x64, even though XP x64 could address 128GB:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa366778(v=vs.85).aspx

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#340281

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2016-01-10 17:03 -0500
Message-ID<n6ukc0$o1h$6@dont-email.me>
In reply to#340211
On 1/9/2016 6:08 PM, owl wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>> On 1/9/2016 4:54 PM, owl wrote:
>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>> On 1/9/2016 8:44 AM, John Gohde wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 11:04:51 PM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/zgbgbq3
>>>>>> On 1/8/2016 12:35 PM, Slimer wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2016-01-08 11:38 AM, DFS wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 1/7/2016 10:29 PM, John Gohde wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A very impressive list of software coming from a well known
>>>>>>>>> @#$%^&*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Too bad the picture of your desktop does NOT remotely support
>>>>>>>>> your fantasy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Moi told you so - LOL.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're too stupid for words, GodHesBroke.  You think every
>>>>>>>> installed app has to be on the taskbar or desktop.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> my start menu: http://i.imgur.com/NZjh3S6.jpg
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> my desktop:    http://i.imgur.com/GiqeC25.jpg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is that XP?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's my old system:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WinServer 2003 Standard, P4 300GHz chip, 2GB memory, Radeon 9600
>>>>>> video
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As I mentioned in the post the other day, the Radeon 5770 video
>>>>>> card in my main system died.  I'm using this old computer until I
>>>>>> get a new graphics card.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Lookie, Stupid DooFuS publicly admits to using Windows XP.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Where did I admit to that, dumbshit?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Server 2003 is XP.
>>
>>
>> Which version of XP would run 1TB of RAM?
>>
>> Don't let me down, fella.  Be all the Linux idiot you can be.
>>
>
> XP is artificially throttled.  So what?  It's the same kernel.


So what?  Sharing substantially the same (not /the same/) kernel doesn't 
make them the same OS.

Server 2003 <> XP, no matter what drooling Linux liars say.

The Windows Server versions have significantly more and different 
capabilities than the desktop versions.



> Just like your Server 2003 Standard Edition is artificially
> throttled to 32 GB on x64, even though XP x64 could address 128GB:
> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa366778(v=vs.85).aspx

Artificial memory and CPU/core throttling is one of the ways MS and 
RedHat differentiate their desktop vs server products in order to 
extract max. revenue from their victims ^^^ customers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#340286

FromPeter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
Date2016-01-11 00:04 +0100
Message-ID<n6uns3$7bu$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#340281
DFS wrote:

> On 1/9/2016 6:08 PM, owl wrote:
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>> On 1/9/2016 4:54 PM, owl wrote:
>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 1/9/2016 8:44 AM, John Gohde wrote:
>>>>>> On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 11:04:51 PM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/zgbgbq3
>>>>>>> On 1/8/2016 12:35 PM, Slimer wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2016-01-08 11:38 AM, DFS wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 1/7/2016 10:29 PM, John Gohde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A very impressive list of software coming from a well known
>>>>>>>>>> @#$%^&*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Too bad the picture of your desktop does NOT remotely support
>>>>>>>>>> your fantasy.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Moi told you so - LOL.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You're too stupid for words, GodHesBroke.  You think every
>>>>>>>>> installed app has to be on the taskbar or desktop.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> my start menu: http://i.imgur.com/NZjh3S6.jpg
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> my desktop:    http://i.imgur.com/GiqeC25.jpg
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is that XP?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's my old system:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WinServer 2003 Standard, P4 300GHz chip, 2GB memory, Radeon 9600
>>>>>>> video
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As I mentioned in the post the other day, the Radeon 5770 video
>>>>>>> card in my main system died.  I'm using this old computer until I
>>>>>>> get a new graphics card.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lookie, Stupid DooFuS publicly admits to using Windows XP.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Where did I admit to that, dumbshit?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Server 2003 is XP.
>>>
>>>
>>> Which version of XP would run 1TB of RAM?
>>>
>>> Don't let me down, fella.  Be all the Linux idiot you can be.
>>>
>>
>> XP is artificially throttled.  So what?  It's the same kernel.
> 
> 
> So what?  Sharing substantially the same (not /the same/) kernel doesn't
> make them the same OS.
> 
> Server 2003 <> XP, no matter what drooling Linux liars say.
> 
> The Windows Server versions have significantly more and different
> capabilities than the desktop versions.
> 

But not because of a different kernel
The sever version has simply more services running. The kernel is basically 
the same. As is the case with linux. Desktop and server have the same 
kernel, just with different services running

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#340287

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2016-01-10 23:17 +0000
Message-ID<ghsjdue92.jgua93@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#340281
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 1/9/2016 6:08 PM, owl wrote:
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>> On 1/9/2016 4:54 PM, owl wrote:
>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 1/9/2016 8:44 AM, John Gohde wrote:
>>>>>> On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 11:04:51 PM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/zgbgbq3
>>>>>>> On 1/8/2016 12:35 PM, Slimer wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2016-01-08 11:38 AM, DFS wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 1/7/2016 10:29 PM, John Gohde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A very impressive list of software coming from a well known
>>>>>>>>>> @#$%^&*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Too bad the picture of your desktop does NOT remotely support
>>>>>>>>>> your fantasy.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Moi told you so - LOL.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You're too stupid for words, GodHesBroke.  You think every
>>>>>>>>> installed app has to be on the taskbar or desktop.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> my start menu: http://i.imgur.com/NZjh3S6.jpg
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> my desktop:    http://i.imgur.com/GiqeC25.jpg
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is that XP?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's my old system:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WinServer 2003 Standard, P4 300GHz chip, 2GB memory, Radeon 9600
>>>>>>> video
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As I mentioned in the post the other day, the Radeon 5770 video
>>>>>>> card in my main system died.  I'm using this old computer until I
>>>>>>> get a new graphics card.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lookie, Stupid DooFuS publicly admits to using Windows XP.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Where did I admit to that, dumbshit?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Server 2003 is XP.
>>>
>>>
>>> Which version of XP would run 1TB of RAM?
>>>
>>> Don't let me down, fella.  Be all the Linux idiot you can be.
>>>
>>
>> XP is artificially throttled.  So what?  It's the same kernel.
> 
> 
> So what?  Sharing substantially the same (not /the same/) kernel doesn't 
> make them the same OS.

The same kernel.  NT 5.2.

> 
> Server 2003 <> XP, no matter what drooling Linux liars say.

Sure it is.

anon@lowtide:~/code$ cat NT-5.2.c
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
 printf("BLAHMAX: %d\n",BLAHMAX);
 return 0;
}
anon@lowtide:~/code$ gcc -Wall -DBLAHMAX=100 -o XP NT-5.2.c
anon@lowtide:~/code$ ./XP
BLAHMAX: 100
anon@lowtide:~/code$ gcc -Wall -DBLAHMAX=10000 -o Server2003 NT-5.2.c
anon@lowtide:~/code$ ./Server2003
BLAHMAX: 10000
anon@lowtide:~/code$ 


> 
> The Windows Server versions have significantly more

Except when it doesn't.

> and different 
> capabilities than the desktop versions.
> 

Different installed utilities does not make a different OS, unless
you think that a Debian base installation is a somehow a different
OS after running apt-get a few times.

> 
> 
>> Just like your Server 2003 Standard Edition is artificially
>> throttled to 32 GB on x64, even though XP x64 could address 128GB:
>> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa366778(v=vs.85).aspx
> 
> Artificial memory and CPU/core throttling is one of the ways MS and 
> RedHat differentiate their desktop vs server products in order to 
> extract max. revenue from their victims ^^^ customers.
> 

Licensing differences do not make a different OS.
"Windows XP x64" is a workstation license for NT 5.2.
"Windows Server 2003" is a server license for NT 5.2.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#340243

FromSlimer <.m@nsn.s>
Date2016-01-10 10:24 -0500
Message-ID<n6tstu$tk6$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#340206
On 2016-01-09 5:44 PM, DFS wrote:
> On 1/9/2016 4:54 PM, owl wrote:
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>> On 1/9/2016 8:44 AM, John Gohde wrote:
>>>> On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 11:04:51 PM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/zgbgbq3
>>>>> On 1/8/2016 12:35 PM, Slimer wrote:
>>>>>> On 2016-01-08 11:38 AM, DFS wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/7/2016 10:29 PM, John Gohde wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A very impressive list of software coming from a well known
>>>>>>>> @#$%^&*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Too bad the picture of your desktop does NOT remotely support
>>>>>>>> your fantasy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Moi told you so - LOL.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're too stupid for words, GodHesBroke.  You think every
>>>>>>> installed app has to be on the taskbar or desktop.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> my start menu: http://i.imgur.com/NZjh3S6.jpg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> my desktop:    http://i.imgur.com/GiqeC25.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is that XP?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It's my old system:
>>>>>
>>>>> WinServer 2003 Standard, P4 300GHz chip, 2GB memory, Radeon 9600
>>>>> video
>>>>>
>>>>> As I mentioned in the post the other day, the Radeon 5770 video
>>>>> card in my main system died.  I'm using this old computer until I
>>>>> get a new graphics card.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Lookie, Stupid DooFuS publicly admits to using Windows XP.
>>>
>>>
>>> Where did I admit to that, dumbshit?
>>>
>>
>> Server 2003 is XP.
> 
> 
> Which version of XP would run 1TB of RAM?
> 
> Don't let me down, fella.  Be all the Linux idiot you can be.

1TB of RAM. Damn... Of course, I still remember being a teenager and
imagining that it would be crazy to have 16GB of RAM. It's amazing that
now, with so much more memory than we used to have, the overall desktop
experience hasn't changed very significantly.


-- 
Slimer
EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW, Mozilla & PETA supporter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#340254

FromMelzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com>
Date2016-01-10 16:48 +0100
Message-ID<20160110164815.6ee8d27f@maxa-pc>
In reply to#340243
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 10:24:15 -0500
Slimer <.m@nsn.s> wrote:

> On 2016-01-09 5:44 PM, DFS wrote:
> > On 1/9/2016 4:54 PM, owl wrote:  
> >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:  
> >>> On 1/9/2016 8:44 AM, John Gohde wrote:  
> >>>> On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 11:04:51 PM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
> >>>> http://tinyurl.com/zgbgbq3  
> >>>>> On 1/8/2016 12:35 PM, Slimer wrote:  
> >>>>>> On 2016-01-08 11:38 AM, DFS wrote:  
> >>>>>>> On 1/7/2016 10:29 PM, John Gohde wrote:
> >>>>>>>  
> >>>>>>>> A very impressive list of software coming from a well known
> >>>>>>>> @#$%^&*
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Too bad the picture of your desktop does NOT remotely support
> >>>>>>>> your fantasy.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Moi told you so - LOL.  
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You're too stupid for words, GodHesBroke.  You think every
> >>>>>>> installed app has to be on the taskbar or desktop.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> my start menu: http://i.imgur.com/NZjh3S6.jpg
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> my desktop:    http://i.imgur.com/GiqeC25.jpg  
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Is that XP?  
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It's my old system:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> WinServer 2003 Standard, P4 300GHz chip, 2GB memory, Radeon 9600
> >>>>> video
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As I mentioned in the post the other day, the Radeon 5770 video
> >>>>> card in my main system died.  I'm using this old computer until
> >>>>> I get a new graphics card.  
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Lookie, Stupid DooFuS publicly admits to using Windows XP.  
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Where did I admit to that, dumbshit?
> >>>  
> >>
> >> Server 2003 is XP.  
> > 
> > 
> > Which version of XP would run 1TB of RAM?
> > 
> > Don't let me down, fella.  Be all the Linux idiot you can be.  
> 
> 1TB of RAM. Damn... Of course, I still remember being a teenager and
> imagining that it would be crazy to have 16GB of RAM. It's amazing
> that now, with so much more memory than we used to have, the overall
> desktop experience hasn't changed very significantly.
> 
> 

From 16MB of RAM to 16GB in 20years ;)
Desktop experience changed significantly, yes.
While 64GB is now possible 32GB would be norm, and 8GB enough.
Technologies like garbage collector and run time compilers are made
possible with plenty of RAM...
While this is completely useless for experience, makes programming
easier.
Virtual machines and jailed environments are also made possible...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#340261

FromSlimer <.m@nsn.s>
Date2016-01-10 11:28 -0500
Message-ID<n6u0me$b0b$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#340254
On 2016-01-10 10:48 AM, Melzzzzz wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 10:24:15 -0500
> Slimer <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> 
>> On 2016-01-09 5:44 PM, DFS wrote:
>>> On 1/9/2016 4:54 PM, owl wrote:  
>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:  
>>>>> On 1/9/2016 8:44 AM, John Gohde wrote:  
>>>>>> On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 11:04:51 PM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/zgbgbq3  
>>>>>>> On 1/8/2016 12:35 PM, Slimer wrote:  
>>>>>>>> On 2016-01-08 11:38 AM, DFS wrote:  
>>>>>>>>> On 1/7/2016 10:29 PM, John Gohde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>> A very impressive list of software coming from a well known
>>>>>>>>>> @#$%^&*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Too bad the picture of your desktop does NOT remotely support
>>>>>>>>>> your fantasy.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Moi told you so - LOL.  
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You're too stupid for words, GodHesBroke.  You think every
>>>>>>>>> installed app has to be on the taskbar or desktop.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> my start menu: http://i.imgur.com/NZjh3S6.jpg
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> my desktop:    http://i.imgur.com/GiqeC25.jpg  
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is that XP?  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's my old system:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WinServer 2003 Standard, P4 300GHz chip, 2GB memory, Radeon 9600
>>>>>>> video
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As I mentioned in the post the other day, the Radeon 5770 video
>>>>>>> card in my main system died.  I'm using this old computer until
>>>>>>> I get a new graphics card.  
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lookie, Stupid DooFuS publicly admits to using Windows XP.  
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Where did I admit to that, dumbshit?
>>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Server 2003 is XP.  
>>>
>>>
>>> Which version of XP would run 1TB of RAM?
>>>
>>> Don't let me down, fella.  Be all the Linux idiot you can be.  
>>
>> 1TB of RAM. Damn... Of course, I still remember being a teenager and
>> imagining that it would be crazy to have 16GB of RAM. It's amazing
>> that now, with so much more memory than we used to have, the overall
>> desktop experience hasn't changed very significantly.
>>
>>
> 
> From 16MB of RAM to 16GB in 20years ;)

I used to think that 16MB of RAM would provide me with an excellent
desktop experience until I actually upgraded to that amount. I don't
think I felt comfortable with the way a GUI operated UNTIL I got to 8GB.

> Desktop experience changed significantly, yes.

In what way?

> While 64GB is now possible 32GB would be norm, and 8GB enough.
> Technologies like garbage collector and run time compilers are made
> possible with plenty of RAM...
> While this is completely useless for experience, makes programming
> easier.
> Virtual machines and jailed environments are also made possible...

Ah, good point.

-- 
Slimer
EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW, Mozilla & PETA supporter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#340264

FromMelzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com>
Date2016-01-10 18:12 +0100
Message-ID<20160110181216.18e5efb2@maxa-pc>
In reply to#340261
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 11:28:32 -0500
Slimer <.m@nsn.s> wrote:

> On 2016-01-10 10:48 AM, Melzzzzz wrote:
> 
> > Desktop experience changed significantly, yes.  
> 
> In what way?
> 

In a way that you can do lot more things now then before...
Say you want to open large document or rip DVDs/CDs. Experience with
16MB of RAM is completely different than that with 16GB...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#340265

FromSlimer <.m@nsn.s>
Date2016-01-10 12:27 -0500
Message-ID<n6u44t$r37$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#340264
On 2016-01-10 12:12 PM, Melzzzzz wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 11:28:32 -0500
> Slimer <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> 
>> On 2016-01-10 10:48 AM, Melzzzzz wrote:
>>
>>> Desktop experience changed significantly, yes.  
>>
>> In what way?
>>
> 
> In a way that you can do lot more things now then before...
> Say you want to open large document or rip DVDs/CDs. Experience with
> 16MB of RAM is completely different than that with 16GB...

You can do more tasks, that's a given but the actual GUI itself is not
much different.


-- 
Slimer
EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW, Mozilla & PETA supporter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#340266

FromMelzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com>
Date2016-01-10 18:34 +0100
Message-ID<20160110183414.6ff509d3@maxa-pc>
In reply to#340265
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:27:27 -0500
Slimer <.m@nsn.s> wrote:

> On 2016-01-10 12:12 PM, Melzzzzz wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 11:28:32 -0500
> > Slimer <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> >   
> >> On 2016-01-10 10:48 AM, Melzzzzz wrote:
> >>  
> >>> Desktop experience changed significantly, yes.    
> >>
> >> In what way?
> >>  
> > 
> > In a way that you can do lot more things now then before...
> > Say you want to open large document or rip DVDs/CDs. Experience with
> > 16MB of RAM is completely different than that with 16GB...  
> 
> You can do more tasks, that's a given but the actual GUI itself is not
> much different.
> 
> 

How do you imagine different?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#340291

FromSlimer <.m@nsn.s>
Date2016-01-10 19:40 -0500
Message-ID<n6utgn$suc$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#340266
On 2016-01-10 12:34 PM, Melzzzzz wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:27:27 -0500
> Slimer <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> 
>> On 2016-01-10 12:12 PM, Melzzzzz wrote:
>>> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 11:28:32 -0500
>>> Slimer <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>>   
>>>> On 2016-01-10 10:48 AM, Melzzzzz wrote:
>>>>  
>>>>> Desktop experience changed significantly, yes.    
>>>>
>>>> In what way?
>>>>  
>>>
>>> In a way that you can do lot more things now then before...
>>> Say you want to open large document or rip DVDs/CDs. Experience with
>>> 16MB of RAM is completely different than that with 16GB...  
>>
>> You can do more tasks, that's a given but the actual GUI itself is not
>> much different.
>>
>>
> 
> How do you imagine different? 

Watch the Minority Report to see what a kid in the 90s would have
expected by now. :)


-- 
Slimer
EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW, Mozilla & PETA supporter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#340272

FromChris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Date2016-01-10 14:04 -0500
Message-ID<n6u9un$ir4$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#340254
Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 10:24:15 -0500
> Slimer <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>
>> On 2016-01-09 5:44 PM, DFS wrote:
>> > On 1/9/2016 4:54 PM, owl wrote:  
>> >>
>> >> Server 2003 is XP.  
>> > 
>> > Which version of XP would run 1TB of RAM?
>> > Don't let me down, fella.  Be all the Linux idiot you can be.  

LOL, Doof called owl a "Linux idiot".

-- 
This was the most unkindest cut of all.
		-- William Shakespeare, "Julius Caesar"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web