Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #331566 > unrolled thread
| Started by | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-07 20:57 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-11-09 06:20 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 119 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2015-11-07 20:57 +0000
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 21:03 +0000
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2015-11-07 21:19 +0000
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2015-12-22 22:20 +0100
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-07 16:48 -0500
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-07 18:43 -0500
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-07 18:32 -0700
Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2015-11-08 11:02 +0000
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Saint George <stgeorge@england.eng> - 2015-11-08 14:57 +0000
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine saneearth <sane@theearth.com> - 2015-11-08 15:55 +0000
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@hub.hob> - 2015-11-08 13:03 -0500
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine totsob <sane@theearth.com> - 2015-11-10 05:30 -0600
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@hub.hob> - 2015-11-10 08:22 -0500
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-09 07:35 -0600
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Saint George <stgeorge@england.eng> - 2015-11-09 14:54 +0000
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-09 10:21 -0500
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:10 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-09 09:28 -0600
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-09 10:34 -0500
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Saint George <stgeorge@england.eng> - 2015-11-09 17:14 +0000
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-09 14:53 -0600
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 15:07 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-09 23:21 +0100
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 22:26 +0000
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 15:32 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-09 23:36 +0100
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:10 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 10:15 +0100
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 14:01 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-09 20:43 -0600
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 10:14 +0100
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-10 10:29 -0600
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 14:03 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 14:02 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-10 09:04 -0500
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 15:33 +0100
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-10 08:49 -0600
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 15:02 +0000
Quiet, Turdv. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 14:05 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-11 09:34 -0500
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 14:04 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-11-10 02:02 +0100
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:08 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 15:31 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-10 09:02 -0500
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 14:10 +0000
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 10:42 -0500
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 14:06 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 17:11 -0500
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:06 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:12 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-11-09 21:24 +0100
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 15:33 -0500
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 16:57 -0800
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 16:51 -0500
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 17:02 -0500
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-09 23:12 +0100
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 17:33 -0500
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 17:45 -0500
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:15 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:13 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 16:54 -0800
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:20 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:20 -0800
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 14:11 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-09 14:51 -0600
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:24 +0000
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Saint George <stgeorge@england.eng> - 2015-11-09 21:37 +0000
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-09 16:06 -0600
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 17:27 -0500
Yeah, we know you are an Idiot, Turdv. So what else is new? GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:23 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-09 16:05 -0600
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-09 23:41 +0000
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 16:49 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:23 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:22 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 15:08 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Saint George <stgeorge@england.eng> - 2015-11-09 22:26 +0000
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 22:27 +0000
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 15:30 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-09 16:36 -0600
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-10 00:12 +0000
You are getting really lame and senile JED. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:25 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2015-11-10 08:49 +0000
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-10 07:34 -0600
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2015-11-10 13:59 +0000
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 15:30 +0100
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2015-11-10 15:37 +0000
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 07:51 -0800
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-10 10:36 -0600
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 17:19 +0000
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 14:14 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 14:12 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-10 22:24 +0000
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 17:09 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 10:17 -0500
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-08 11:08 -0500
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 11:18 -0500
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-08 15:49 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2015-11-10 08:24 +0000
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 14:15 -0700
Re: Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-08 11:04 -0500
Trading software developed for Windoze only, no Linux support at all! Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 22:40 -0800
Re: Trading software developed for Windoze only, no Linux support at all! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-11-09 07:49 +0100
Re: Trading software developed for Windoze only, no Linux support at all! Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 00:18 -0800
Re: Trading software developed for Windoze only, no Linux support at all! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-09 06:20 -0500
Re: Trading software developed for Windoze only, no Linux support at all! Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 05:30 -0800
Re: Trading software developed for Windoze only, no Linux support at all! Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 08:36 -0500
Re: Trading software developed for Windoze only, no Linux support at all! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-09 10:19 -0500
Re: Trading software developed for Windoze only, no Linux support at all! William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-11-09 17:35 +0000
And you can't even afford to go on the stock market, luser. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:15 -0700
And now, show the link. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:14 -0700
Re: Trading software developed for Windoze only, no Linux support at all! Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 17:15 -0800
Re: Trading software developed for Windoze only, no Linux support at all! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-10 06:01 -0500
Re: Trading software developed for Windoze only, no Linux support at all! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-10 09:01 -0500
Re: Trading software developed for Windoze only, no Linux support at all! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 09:57 -0500
Re: Trading software developed for Windoze only, no Linux support at all! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 14:17 -0700
So name one. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:14 -0700
Re: Trading software developed for Windoze only, no Linux support at all! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-09 06:20 -0500
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 20:57 +0000 |
| Subject | Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 CPU desktop machine |
| Message-ID | <7Bt%x.64926$XO1.18360@fx38.am4> |
Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 Core desktop machines ------------------------------------------------------------------- Its no brainer, Linux has beaten Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 core desktop machines for a long time now. Linux runs on the best parallel machines and the best desktops with dozens of CPU cores all running Linux. Have been doing so for years. Fake browser stats used by Appil and Windopws trolls never cut any mustard with power desktop Linux users. True desktop power is 64 core desktops running Linux. Used by real engineers to stock traders.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 21:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <da7794Fj5k8U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #331566 |
On Sat, 07 Nov 2015 20:57:38 +0000, 7 wrote: > Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 Core desktop machines > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Its no brainer, Linux has beaten Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 core > desktop machines for a long time now. > > Linux runs on the best parallel machines and the best desktops with > dozens of CPU cores all running Linux. > > Have been doing so for years. > > Fake browser stats used by Appil and Windopws trolls never cut any > mustard with power desktop Linux users. True desktop power is 64 core > desktops running Linux. Used by real engineers to stock traders. A quick google search shows that while Linux can be the OS, so can Windows. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 21:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <CVt%x.45757$Nk3.30746@fx34.am4> |
| In reply to | #331569 |
Lloyd Parsons wrote: >> Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 Core desktop machines >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Its no brainer, Linux has beaten Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 core >> desktop machines for a long time now. >> >> Linux runs on the best parallel machines and the best desktops with >> dozens of CPU cores all running Linux. >> >> Have been doing so for years. >> >> Fake browser stats used by Appil and Windopws trolls never cut any >> mustard with power desktop Linux users. True desktop power is 64 core >> desktops running Linux. Used by real engineers to stock traders. > > A quick google search shows that It shows what the original post reported, namely Linux beats Appil and Microshaft on 64 Core desktop machines. Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 Core desktop machines ------------------------------------------------------------------- Its no brainer, Linux has beaten Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 core desktop machines for a long time now. Linux runs on the best parallel machines and the best desktops with dozens of CPU cores all running Linux. Have been doing so for years. Fake browser stats used by Appil and Windopws trolls never cut any mustard with power desktop Linux users. True desktop power is 64 core desktops running Linux. Used by real engineers to stock traders.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-22 22:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n5cer7$ptu$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #331571 |
Distro flipping clown of Cola, Joseph - "cuckoo "7" - Michael wrote: > >>> Linux > Does it have Grub 2, tard? http://hmarco.org/bugs/CVE-2015-8370-Grub2-authentication-bypass.html b.t.w. You should better post to: alt.os.linux.is-for-turds alt.os.linux.is-for-buffoons alt.os.linux.is-for-geeks alt.os.linux.is-for-morons alt.os.linux.is-for-nerds alt.os.linux.is-for-poofters alt.os.linux.is-a-four-letter-word alt.os.linux.is-a-joke alt.os.linux.is-for-affected-queers alt.os.linux.is-for-idiots alt.os.linux.is-for-old-pcs alt.os.linux.is-for-pedophiles alt.os.linux.is-for-pinheads alt.os.linux.is-for-ponces alt.os.linux.is-for-poofters alt.os.linux.is-for-pussies alt.os.linux.is-for-retards alt.os.linux.is-one-huge-kludge alt.os.linux.is-rooted BWAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 16:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1lrfe$1s8$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #331566 |
On 2015-11-07 3:57 PM, 7 wrote: > Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 Core desktop machines > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Its no brainer, Linux has beaten Appil and Microshaft to run on > 64 core desktop machines for a long time now. > > Linux runs on the best parallel machines and the best desktops with dozens > of CPU cores all running Linux. The addition of Linux has made the computer worthless. > Have been doing so for years. > > Fake browser stats used by Appil and Windopws trolls never cut any mustard > with power desktop Linux users. True desktop power is 64 core desktops > running Linux. Used by real engineers to stock traders. Let me know once you find a person who actually has a 64-core machine at home. I'm sure he'd be all too happy to waste its potential by putting Linux on it. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 18:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <201511071843357987-BL@LinuxProfessionalscom> |
| In reply to | #331566 |
On 2015-11-07 20:57:38 +0000, 7 said: > Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 Core desktop machines > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Its no brainer, Linux has beaten Appil and Microshaft to run on > 64 core desktop machines for a long time now. > > Linux runs on the best parallel machines and the best desktops with dozens > of CPU cores all running Linux. > > Have been doing so for years. > > Fake browser stats used by Appil and Windopws trolls never cut any mustard > with power desktop Linux users. True desktop power is 64 core desktops > running Linux. Used by real engineers to stock traders. There is no practical limit to the number of cores OS X can run other than the thread pointer size. If that is a word, then it would be 65536 threads (or cores). It's more than a byte as I have well over 256 threads running at present (4 cores/HT = 8 threads at a time) and the user thread limit (as running) is over 700 threads. The license limit is whatever number Apple ship. In a high end Mac Pro that would be 8 hard cores. Some people have slapped in 15 core (30 thread) CPU's into Mac Pros and gotten that many cores running. So while someone might be playing out there, that does not limit OS X. I don't know about Windows but I doubt there are serious constraints there either.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 18:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <iYKdnf4uz_-yO6PLnZ2dnUU7-a2dnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #331566 |
On 11/07/15 13:57, 7 wrote: > Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 Core desktop machines > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Its no brainer, Linux has beaten Appil and Microshaft to run on > 64 core desktop machines for a long time now. > > Linux runs on the best parallel machines and the best desktops with dozens > of CPU cores all running Linux. > > Have been doing so for years. > > Fake browser stats used by Appil and Windopws trolls never cut any mustard > with power desktop Linux users. True desktop power is 64 core desktops > running Linux. Used by real engineers to stock traders. > > > Who... gives... a... shit? -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 11:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lZF%x.83155$wR.33997@fx43.am4> |
| In reply to | #331610 |
GreyCloud wrote: > Who... gives Linux gives. And learning to support 64 core desktop Linux PCs earns you more employment opportunities. Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 Core desktop machines ------------------------------------------------------------------- Its no brainer, Linux has beaten Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 core desktop machines for a long time now. Linux runs on the best parallel machines and the best desktops with dozens of CPU cores all running Linux. Have been doing so for years. Fake browser stats used by Appil and Windopws trolls never cut any mustard with power desktop Linux users. True desktop power is 64 core desktops running Linux. Used by real engineers to stock traders.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saint George <stgeorge@england.eng> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 14:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n1nnnj$ojm$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #331627 |
On 08/11/2015 11:02 am, 7 wrote: > GreyCloud wrote: > > >> Who... gives > > Linux gives. > > And learning to support 64 core desktop Linux PCs > earns you more employment opportunities. > > > > Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 Core desktop machines > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Its no brainer, Linux has beaten Appil and Microshaft to run on > 64 core desktop machines for a long time now. > > Linux runs on the best parallel machines and the best desktops with dozens > of CPU cores all running Linux. > > Have been doing so for years. > > Fake browser stats used by Appil and Windopws trolls never cut any mustard > with power desktop Linux users. True desktop power is 64 core desktops > running Linux. Used by real engineers to stock traders. > No it didn't, Windows and OS X went 64 bit at the same time x86_64 CPUs became available... Nothing special about Linux, it just a rip-off of UNIX®...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | saneearth <sane@theearth.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 15:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <563f707d$0$31061$c3e8da3$b1356c67@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #331643 |
On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 14:57:01 +0000, Saint George wrote: > On 08/11/2015 11:02 am, 7 wrote: >> GreyCloud wrote: >> >> >>> Who... gives >> >> Linux gives. >> >> And learning to support 64 core desktop Linux PCs earns you more >> employment opportunities. >> >> >> >> Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 Core desktop machines >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Its no brainer, Linux has beaten Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 core >> desktop machines for a long time now. >> >> Linux runs on the best parallel machines and the best desktops with >> dozens of CPU cores all running Linux. >> >> Have been doing so for years. >> >> Fake browser stats used by Appil and Windopws trolls never cut any >> mustard with power desktop Linux users. True desktop power is 64 core >> desktops running Linux. Used by real engineers to stock traders. >> >> > No it didn't, Windows and OS X went 64 bit at the same time x86_64 CPUs > became available... > > Nothing special about Linux, it just a rip-off of UNIX®... The keyword is "core" not "bit". Windows also runs now on 64 core processors, but the first servers with 64 "core" processors had Linux. It is not a big deal either way.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@hub.hob> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 13:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <20151108130358.00001459@hub.hob> |
| In reply to | #331660 |
On 08 Nov 2015 15:55:42 GMT saneearth <sane@theearth.com> wrote: > On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 14:57:01 +0000, Saint George wrote: > > > On 08/11/2015 11:02 am, 7 wrote: > >> GreyCloud wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Who... gives > >> > >> Linux gives. > >> > >> And learning to support 64 core desktop Linux PCs earns you more > >> employment opportunities. > >> > >> > >> > >> Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 Core desktop machines > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Its no brainer, Linux has beaten Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 > >> core desktop machines for a long time now. > >> > >> Linux runs on the best parallel machines and the best desktops with > >> dozens of CPU cores all running Linux. > >> > >> Have been doing so for years. > >> > >> Fake browser stats used by Appil and Windopws trolls never cut any > >> mustard with power desktop Linux users. True desktop power is 64 > >> core desktops running Linux. Used by real engineers to stock > >> traders. > >> > >> > > No it didn't, Windows and OS X went 64 bit at the same time x86_64 > > CPUs became available... > > > > Nothing special about Linux, it just a rip-off of UNIX®... > > The keyword is "core" not "bit". Windows also runs now on 64 core > processors, but the first servers with 64 "core" processors had > Linux. It is not a big deal either way. Then STFU!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | totsob <sane@theearth.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 05:30 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <9al34b52mtfj1npsc775u25upln9ni1jhi@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #331693 |
On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 13:03:58 -0500, burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@hub.hob> wrote: >On 08 Nov 2015 15:55:42 GMT >saneearth <sane@theearth.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 14:57:01 +0000, Saint George wrote: >> >> > On 08/11/2015 11:02 am, 7 wrote: >> >> GreyCloud wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> Who... gives >> >> >> >> Linux gives. >> >> >> >> And learning to support 64 core desktop Linux PCs earns you more >> >> employment opportunities. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 Core desktop machines >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> Its no brainer, Linux has beaten Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 >> >> core desktop machines for a long time now. >> >> >> >> Linux runs on the best parallel machines and the best desktops with >> >> dozens of CPU cores all running Linux. >> >> >> >> Have been doing so for years. >> >> >> >> Fake browser stats used by Appil and Windopws trolls never cut any >> >> mustard with power desktop Linux users. True desktop power is 64 >> >> core desktops running Linux. Used by real engineers to stock >> >> traders. >> >> >> >> >> > No it didn't, Windows and OS X went 64 bit at the same time x86_64 >> > CPUs became available... >> > >> > Nothing special about Linux, it just a rip-off of UNIX®... >> >> The keyword is "core" not "bit". Windows also runs now on 64 core >> processors, but the first servers with 64 "core" processors had >> Linux. It is not a big deal either way. > >Then STFU! Oh, go play in your right wing fantasy land you little pussy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@hub.hob> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 08:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <20151110082205.00003221@hub.hob> |
| In reply to | #332219 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 05:30:58 -0600 totsob <sane@theearth.com> wrote: > On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 13:03:58 -0500, burfordTjustice > <burfordTjustice@hub.hob> wrote: > > >On 08 Nov 2015 15:55:42 GMT > >saneearth <sane@theearth.com> wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 14:57:01 +0000, Saint George wrote: > >> > >> > On 08/11/2015 11:02 am, 7 wrote: > >> >> GreyCloud wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>> Who... gives > >> >> > >> >> Linux gives. > >> >> > >> >> And learning to support 64 core desktop Linux PCs earns you more > >> >> employment opportunities. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Linux beats Appil and Microshaft to run on 64 Core desktop > >> >> machines > >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> > >> >> Its no brainer, Linux has beaten Appil and Microshaft to run on > >> >> 64 core desktop machines for a long time now. > >> >> > >> >> Linux runs on the best parallel machines and the best desktops > >> >> with dozens of CPU cores all running Linux. > >> >> > >> >> Have been doing so for years. > >> >> > >> >> Fake browser stats used by Appil and Windopws trolls never cut > >> >> any mustard with power desktop Linux users. True desktop power > >> >> is 64 core desktops running Linux. Used by real engineers to > >> >> stock traders. > >> >> > >> >> > >> > No it didn't, Windows and OS X went 64 bit at the same time > >> > x86_64 CPUs became available... > >> > > >> > Nothing special about Linux, it just a rip-off of UNIX®... > >> > >> The keyword is "core" not "bit". Windows also runs now on 64 core > >> processors, but the first servers with 64 "core" processors had > >> Linux. It is not a big deal either way. > > > >Then STFU! > > Oh, go play in your right wing fantasy land you little pussy. You are very weak, practice then try getting off the porch again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 07:35 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <a5814bp8dricrc2bcvl4bu864c7a8knmjg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #331643 |
Saint George wrote: >No it didn't, Windows and OS X went 64 bit at the same time x86_64 CPUs >became available... > >Nothing special about Linux, it just a rip-off of UNIX®... Idiot. -- 'It's easy to hide behind some pedantic argument that "Linux is just a kernel" or Linux is only an OS and doesn't manufacture anything.' - trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel", attacking Free software over the labor practices of a company that happens to use it
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saint George <stgeorge@england.eng> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 14:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n1qbv6$qs4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #331846 |
On 09/11/2015 01:35 pm, chrisv wrote: > Saint George wrote: > >> No it didn't, Windows and OS X went 64 bit at the same time x86_64 CPUs >> became available... >> >> Nothing special about Linux, it just a rip-off of UNIX®... > > Idiot. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix#/media/File:Unix_history-simple.svg Linux, MacOS X, x.BSD, Solaris - all UNIX like clones...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 10:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1qdiu$1ad$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #331867 |
Saint George wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On 09/11/2015 01:35 pm, chrisv wrote: >> Saint George wrote: >> >>> No it didn't, Windows and OS X went 64 bit at the same time x86_64 CPUs >>> became available... >>> >>> Nothing special about Linux, it just a rip-off of UNIX®... >> >> Idiot. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix#/media/File:Unix_history-simple.svg > > Linux, MacOS X, x.BSD, Solaris - all UNIX like clones... Just like Windows NT is a VMS like clone. http://windowsitpro.com/windows-client/windows-nt-and-vms-rest-story -- Every cloud engenders not a storm. -- William Shakespeare, "Henry VI"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 13:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4o2dnZFD0KVXYN3LnZ2dnUU7-RudnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #331881 |
On 11/09/15 08:21, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Saint George wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On 09/11/2015 01:35 pm, chrisv wrote: >>> Saint George wrote: >>> >>>> No it didn't, Windows and OS X went 64 bit at the same time x86_64 CPUs >>>> became available... >>>> >>>> Nothing special about Linux, it just a rip-off of UNIX®... >>> >>> Idiot. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix#/media/File:Unix_history-simple.svg >> >> Linux, MacOS X, x.BSD, Solaris - all UNIX like clones... > > Just like Windows NT is a VMS like clone. > > http://windowsitpro.com/windows-client/windows-nt-and-vms-rest-story > Far from it. Where is the name$table in NT at, Chris? Or the process$table or command$table at in NT? -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 09:28 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <tmd14bpvtlfcsf1npjot5n205mn22u9m47@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #331867 |
Saint George wrote: > chrisv wrote: >> >> Saint George wrote: >>> >>> No it didn't, Windows and OS X went 64 bit at the same time x86_64 CPUs >>> became available... >>> >>> Nothing special about Linux, it just a rip-off of UNIX®... >> >> Idiot. > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix#/media/File:Unix_history-simple.svg > >Linux, MacOS X, x.BSD, Solaris - all UNIX like clones... I would not object to someone merely stating that Linux is a "UNIX like clone", idiot. -- 'This notion that average people can "negotiate complexities" is demonstrably false even with simple things like restaurant menus, car options (leather seats, etc) and flavors of jams/ice-cream.' - trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel", lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 10:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1qebt$4qs$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #331883 |
chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > -- > 'This notion that average people can "negotiate complexities" is > demonstrably false even with simple things like restaurant menus, car > options (leather seats, etc) and flavors of jams/ice-cream.' - > trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel", lying shamelessly LOL -- Your love life will be happy and harmonious.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saint George <stgeorge@england.eng> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 17:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n1qk50$q82$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #331883 |
On 09/11/2015 03:28 pm, chrisv wrote: > Saint George wrote: > >> chrisv wrote: >>> >>> Saint George wrote: >>>> >>>> No it didn't, Windows and OS X went 64 bit at the same time x86_64 CPUs >>>> became available... >>>> >>>> Nothing special about Linux, it just a rip-off of UNIX®... >>> >>> Idiot. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix#/media/File:Unix_history-simple.svg >> >> Linux, MacOS X, x.BSD, Solaris - all UNIX like clones... > > I would not object to someone merely stating that Linux is a "UNIX > like clone", idiot. > What's the matter, truth hurts?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web