Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #724535 > unrolled thread

Re: In the atheist bible, is homosexuality condemned?

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: In the atheist bible, is homosexuality condemned? Hang Newsom <winery@fraud.cal> - 2026-10-22 23:02 +0200
    Re: In the atheist bible, is homosexuality condemned? Blaine <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-10-22 15:20 -0600
    Re: In the atheist bible, is homosexuality condemned? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-10-22 22:55 -0700

#724535 — Re: In the atheist bible, is homosexuality condemned?

On 31 Jul 2026, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> posted some
news:6a6d27d5$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com: 

> On Jul 31, 2026 at 5:05:11 AM MST, "Attila" wrote
><7r3p6ltqemka54cf1oq17po3fidptca2ga@4ax.com>:
> 
>> On 31 Jul 2026 08:42:17 GMT, Brock McNuggets
>> <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>> <6a6c5fe9$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> wrote:
> 
> ...
>>>> 
>>>> Prove that with evidence.  Provide a link to where I said
>>>> that.
>>> 
>>> You repeatedly said you do not want due process for those you think
>>> are here illegally.
> 
> You ignored this to troll.
> 
> Keep in mind the main differences between liberal and conservative
> world views:
> 
> * Liberals: support equal rights and environmental protection, with a
> focus on investing in the future and building a stronger tie between
> productivity and financial reward.

That's total bullshit.  Liberals support using everyone else's money BUT 
THEIR OWN to fund their pet projects that encompass fraud, surrender of 
sovereignty, murder of children, and rule of lawless.

> Liberals want evidence-based regulation and oversight to help ensure
> clean air and water, safe food, and human rights. 

Bullshit.  They want CONTROL.

Liberals are so fucking stupid that they think they can control the sun, 
stars, moon, and weather.

Not a damned one of them can explain what happened to over 4,000 feet of 
additional water that used to cover the surface of planet Earth.  They 
think poisonous battery powered cars are the future.  All it will take is 
one major volcanic eruption to kill those vehicles for two years.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#724536

Hang Newsom wrote:
> On 31 Jul 2026, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> posted some
> news:6a6d27d5$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
> 
>> On Jul 31, 2026 at 5:05:11 AM MST, "Attila" wrote
>> <7r3p6ltqemka54cf1oq17po3fidptca2ga@4ax.com>:
>>
>>> On 31 Jul 2026 08:42:17 GMT, Brock McNuggets
>>> <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>> <6a6c5fe9$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Prove that with evidence.  Provide a link to where I said
>>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> You repeatedly said you do not want due process for those you think
>>>> are here illegally.
>>
>> You ignored this to troll.
>>
>> Keep in mind the main differences between liberal and conservative
>> world views:
>>
>> * Liberals: support equal rights and environmental protection, with a
>> focus on investing in the future and building a stronger tie between
>> productivity and financial reward.
> 
> That's total bullshit.  Liberals support using everyone else's money BUT
> THEIR OWN to fund their pet projects that encompass fraud, surrender of
> sovereignty, murder of children, and rule of lawless.

also, pizza dough & pizza sauce.

-- 
Can you strip away so we may start again?
"There’s a switch and they don't
seem authentic or themselves. It
feels like I’m an unnecessary
body and it’s a waste of time to
even be there." -- Grim, playful Blaine.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#724545

On Oct 22, 2026 at 2:02 PM, Hang Newsom wrote in
482299d4b18d869a98458d909d9a7e0e@dizum.com:
> On 31 Jul 2026, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> posted
> some news:6a6d27d5$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
> 
>> On Jul 31, 2026 at 5:05:11 AM MST, "Attila" wrote
>> <7r3p6ltqemka54cf1oq17po3fidptca2ga@4ax.com>:
>> 
>>> On 31 Jul 2026 08:42:17 GMT, Brock McNuggets
>>> <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>> <6a6c5fe9$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> wrote:
>> 
>> ...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Prove that with evidence. Provide a link to where I said that.
>>>> 
>>>> You repeatedly said you do not want due process for those you think
>>>> are here illegally.
>> 
>> You ignored this to troll.
>> 
>> Keep in mind the main differences between liberal and conservative
>> world views:
>> 
>> * Liberals: support equal rights and environmental protection, with a
>> focus on investing in the future and building a stronger tie between
>> productivity and financial reward.
> 
> That's total bullshit. Liberals support using everyone else's money
> BUT THEIR OWN to fund their pet projects that encompass fraud,
> surrender of sovereignty, murder of children, and rule of lawless.

A claim you will not back. An emotional based claim.

Remember, where conservatives TEND to focus on emotion and feelings,
liberals TEND to focus on evidence-based-policies and equal rights. You
FEEL that way and to you that makes it true. Not that liberals are
immune from such, but in general we tend to look to evidence.
> 
>> Liberals want evidence-based regulation and oversight to help ensure
>> clean air and water, safe food, and human rights.
> 
> Bullshit. They want CONTROL.

Nope. If anything they want to remove government control. Get the
government out of the bedroom, out of religion, etc. But do have safety
nets up to prevent Christians or Muslims or gun owners or other groups
from harming / forcing their will on others. If you are trans, gay,
black, white, Asian, Muslim, Christian, atheist, or whatever -- all
good. Conservatives push for special entitlements for those they
identify with, and the rich.
> 
> Liberals are so fucking stupid that they think they can control the
> sun, stars, moon, and weather.

Again, that is your FEELINGS. I get it. And to you that makes it true.
But I like evidence. You have none. You will not convince me without
EVIDENCE.

> Not a damned one of them can explain what happened to over 4,000 feet
> of additional water that used to cover the surface of planet Earth.

Nothing happened to it, because it was never there. The highest sea
level anyone has reconstructed in the last 540 million years is the
Cretaceous, at roughly 100 to 220 meters above today's (about 330 to 720
feet), depending on the method. 4,000 feet is about 1,200 meters, five
to ten times higher than the best estimates. The Cretaceous high came
from two things, ice-free poles and shallower ocean basins from fast
seafloor spreading. It was not extra water. The total volume of water on
Earth has stayed about the same.

https://www.uu.nl/en/news/Sea-level-up-to-540-million-years-ago
https://www.e-education.psu.edu/earth103/node/733

But that is evidence, and for conservatives, in general, that is not the
focus. Feelings is. So we just speak different languages.

> They think poisonous battery powered cars are the future. All it will
> take is one major volcanic eruption to kill those vehicles for two
> years.

Volcanic ash is fine glass particles that clog air filters fast, and any
that gets past a filter abrades the engine's precision parts. USGS tells
drivers to change oil and air filters constantly and not to drive
without an air filter at all. An EV has no combustion air intake to
choke, so it has no ash-in-the-cylinders failure mode. Ash does foul
cabin filters, brakes and exposed moving parts on every kind of car, EVs
included, and heavy ashfall can take down power lines and transformers.
Those are real costs, but they hit the gas pump and the refinery's
electrical supply just as hard as the charger.

https://volcanoes.usgs.gov/volcanic_ash/vehicles.html
https://pnsn.org/outreach/volcanichazards/ash-falls

Again: evidence. Facts. As a liberal I focus on that over the feelings
you focus on.

-- 
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace
with you.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web