Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #485936 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-25 03:21 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-01-25 22:16 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 165 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
OT: Satan's Playground — New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 03:21 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-25 07:03 -0600
Expecting to get facts from a fruit is pure insanity Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 05:24 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 13:33 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-25 09:19 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-25 15:27 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 16:18 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 20:15 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-25 13:59 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 22:02 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-25 14:18 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 22:39 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-25 15:10 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 23:23 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-25 16:22 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 07:19 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-26 17:36 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-30 07:22 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-30 14:45 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:14 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-30 15:56 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 08:02 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-30 16:13 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 08:16 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 02:25 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-30 10:19 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-30 16:00 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-31 07:05 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-30 10:18 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-30 10:24 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-30 16:01 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 02:27 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 08:34 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-30 15:59 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-03 19:25 -0700
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-30 15:56 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-03 19:23 -0700
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 02:23 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 02:21 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-30 15:53 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-31 07:20 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 16:22 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 02:20 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 22:07 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-26 21:51 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 07:31 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-25 10:06 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 09:10 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 16:17 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-25 12:33 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 20:12 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-25 16:44 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 23:17 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-28 08:11 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 20:04 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-25 16:42 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 21:50 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 23:11 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 23:25 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 23:29 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-26 22:03 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 04:13 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-27 05:49 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 07:44 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-27 09:40 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-27 09:54 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 10:27 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-27 18:43 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-27 15:16 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 16:45 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-28 04:33 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 08:17 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-28 10:05 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 12:44 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-28 18:21 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 20:00 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-29 03:32 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-29 08:41 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 17:45 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 08:14 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-29 09:44 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 10:44 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-29 20:25 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 07:58 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-30 09:42 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 11:04 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-31 05:19 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 06:50 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 06:58 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-31 08:58 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 10:39 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-31 11:33 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 11:58 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 12:23 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-31 12:31 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-31 21:11 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-31 13:20 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-01-31 21:47 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 22:48 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 06:52 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 07:25 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-01 11:08 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 11:36 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 11:50 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-01 13:24 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 11:15 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 11:52 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-03 19:27 -0700
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-03 19:28 -0700
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-01 20:25 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-01 14:31 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-01 13:28 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 13:56 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-01 22:04 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 14:27 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Tommy B <riceornice8p@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 23:11 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 15:15 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 21:48 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 07:42 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-04 07:11 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York flyer <snowflyer09o@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 13:53 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-02 04:49 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 05:22 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-02 16:06 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 08:29 -0800
You can't forge the "Path:" line. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-02 10:51 -0800
Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-02 10:57 -0800
Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 11:21 -0800
Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 12:08 -0800
Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-05 00:20 -0600
Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 22:49 -0800
Re: Google Groups users don't have to worry about getting banned. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 23:52 -0800
ProtonMail. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-04 23:05 -0800
Re: PutinMail. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-05 01:07 -0600
Re: ProtonMail. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 23:21 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-02 12:16 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 12:39 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-02 20:58 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-02 14:12 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 14:29 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-03 18:46 +0000
Google Groups doesn't let you alter the IP adress. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-02 10:45 -0800
Re: Google Groups doesn't let you alter the IP adress. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-02 19:02 +0000
You can't forge the "Path:" line, grasshopper. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-02 11:06 -0800
Re: You can't forge the "Path:" line, grasshopper. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-02 19:08 +0000
_YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-02 11:28 -0800
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-05 00:29 -0600
_YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-04 22:58 -0800
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-05 14:11 -0600
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-05 13:16 -0500
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-05 13:59 -0800
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-05 17:31 -0500
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2019-02-05 22:47 +0000
Re: _YOU_ can't forge the "Path:" line, idiot. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-05 14:54 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 12:54 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 17:48 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-31 22:32 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-28 12:16 -0700
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-27 23:39 +0000
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 08:31 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-28 07:18 -0600
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-25 12:31 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground New York silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-25 12:26 -0500
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-01-25 14:09 -0800
Re: OT: Satan's Playground — New York Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-25 22:16 +0000
Page 6 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-01 07:25 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <903d6d11-2edc-475f-b191-80e9c266a00f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486336 |
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 7:52:56 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 1:31:16 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: > > On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 2:59:02 PM UTC-5, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > -hh wrote: > > > > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > -hh wrote: > > > > > > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > > > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since ~2008; Area/Access Denial SME; go use DTIC for > > > > > > > > > literature searches. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Proof? And even if you did prove it, this doesn't mean you > > > > > > > > are intimately familiar with issues facing the people on the > > > > > > > > ground. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/1034816.pdf> > > > > > > > <https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/1032098.pdf> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's all I saw by searching on your name, if there's more, > > > > > > > and it's actually relevant, you're going to have to point it out. > > > > > > > > > > > > Your DTIC search was incomplete, as it was limited to only those > > > > > > pubs which are "DIST-A" (approved for public release). > > > > > > > > > > LOL! You sent me on this search... > > > > > > > > To which you've now provided independent confirmation that > > > > I do indeed have publications in DTIC. > > > > > > Not quite, what I've provided is a link to a couple of > > > irrelevant docs that bear a name for which you're > > > *claiming* the identity. > > > > Because posting from the domain that's been registered to that > > name for the last decade+ suddenly isn't good enough! Shocking! /S > > That presumes I believe you're the same person as the name > being used. I'm thinking back to when we had a discussion of > me proving my usenet 'lineage' back to 2003 or so, you poo > poo'd without really looking at the arguments I made. Had you, > you'd have seen how silly your position is. > > > > You were asked to back > > > your claim and those 2 docs don't cut it... even if > > > you were involved with them. > > > > Just because you don't know enough to know of applicability > > doesn't mean that there is none. > > Why don't you draw that connection for readers who may > not "know of applicability" towards your claim that you are > doing border security. > > > > > > ...now you tell me all I've found were items "approved > > > > > for public release", as if I could somehow gain access > > > > > to the stuff that *isn't*. > > > > > > > > Incorrect, for I made no assumptions on your credentials > > > > > > As I'm not the person who suggested he 'does' > > > border security, your new 'whataboutism' here is > > > just as irrelevant as most of what you've posted. > > > > No, you're just complaining that you lack the credentials > > to be allowed to see anything more than just a narrow slice. > > > LOL! Do you really think this red herring fools anyone? > > *You* suggested I search for something that you lead > me to believe would prove you 'do' border security. I go > do that and come up with things that don't convince me > of your expertise on matters that too many people doing > the job have asked for more/better fencing/barrier/wall. > > Now, you're trying yet another 'whataboutism' that points > away from the fact that you failed to prove your claim. > The only question left: Is anyone surprised by this? > > I doubt it... Honestly, what lie? Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! You're clueless! Are you being stupid on purpose? Why would you want to cap all commands on Fedora to what can be done on Macs? When I got here, I wanted to be equitable and open minded. I gave Desk Rabbit more than an intelligent person should. -- "You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention" Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-01 11:08 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <83068794-31b9-4d03-91d6-d19ba9c1506d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486336 |
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 9:52:56 AM UTC-5, Steve Carroll wrote: > -hh wrote: > > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > -hh wrote: > > > > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > ... > > > > > LOL! You sent me on this search... > > > > > > > > To which you've now provided independent confirmation > > > > that I do indeed have publications in DTIC. > > > > > > Not quite, what I've provided is a link to a couple of > > > irrelevant docs that bear a name for which you're > > > *claiming* the identity. > > > > Because posting from the domain that's been registered to that > > name for the last decade+ suddenly isn't good enough! Shocking! /S > > That presumes I believe you're the same person as the name > being used. Which arrogantly presumes that you're the only person that matters. > > > You were asked to back > > > your claim and those 2 docs don't cut it... even if > > > you were involved with them. > > > > Just because you don't know enough to know of applicability > > doesn't mean that there is none. > > Why don't you draw that connection for readers who may > not "know of applicability" towards your claim that you are > doing border security. Thermal injury risks to the eye includes those from Flash-Bangs; <https://www.abc15.com/news/national/border-patrol-official-defends-use-of-tear-gas-on-migrants-at-border-crossing> Of course, this connection will be claimed as still being inadequate, because you have to find a way to deny it, such as by claiming that a F/B isn't a physical wall. Of course it isn't, but the logical failure here is in assuming that a wall is the only possible tool with which to provide an Area Denial capability. > > > > > ...now you tell me all I've found were items "approved > > > > > for public release", as if I could somehow gain access > > > > > to the stuff that *isn't*. > > > > > > > > Incorrect, for I made no assumptions on your credentials > > > > > > As I'm not the person who suggested he 'does' > > > border security, your new 'whataboutism' here is > > > just as irrelevant as most of what you've posted. > > > > No, you're just complaining that you lack the credentials > > to be allowed to see anything more than just a narrow slice. > > LOL! Do you really think this red herring fools anyone? On the contrary: we all knew from the start that there's absolutely nothing in the world that could be posted online which would result in you publically reversing your entrenched position. That's why you're not really my audience. > *You* suggested I search for something that you lead > me to believe would prove you 'do' border security. I go > do that and come up with things that don't convince me > of your expertise on matters ... Because of *your* limitations, not mine. > ...that too many people doing the job have asked > for more/better fencing/barrier/wall. IIRC, didn't I previously ask for just who this is that's been asking for only more/better walls? In any event, the political rhetoric of walls/fences is a bad joke if they're serious, because that's a predetermination to a specific hardware solution before the actual capability requirements have been defined and analyzed. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-01 11:36 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <e798cc30-f968-421b-844e-353996b01b70@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486366 |
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 12:08:08 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 9:52:56 AM UTC-5, Steve Carroll wrote: > > -hh wrote: > > > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > -hh wrote: > > > > > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > > ... > > > > > > LOL! You sent me on this search... > > > > > > > > > > To which you've now provided independent confirmation > > > > > that I do indeed have publications in DTIC. > > > > > > > > Not quite, what I've provided is a link to a couple of > > > > irrelevant docs that bear a name for which you're > > > > *claiming* the identity. > > > > > > Because posting from the domain that's been registered to that > > > name for the last decade+ suddenly isn't good enough! Shocking! /S > > > > That presumes I believe you're the same person as the name > > being used. > > Which arrogantly presumes that you're the only person that matters. > > > > > > You were asked to back > > > > your claim and those 2 docs don't cut it... even if > > > > you were involved with them. > > > > > > Just because you don't know enough to know of applicability > > > doesn't mean that there is none. > > > > Why don't you draw that connection for readers who may > > not "know of applicability" towards your claim that you are > > doing border security. > > Thermal injury risks to the eye includes those from Flash-Bangs; > > <https://www.abc15.com/news/national/border-patrol-official-defends-use-of-tear-gas-on-migrants-at-border-crossing> > > Of course, this connection will be claimed as still being inadequate, > because you have to find a way to deny it, such as by claiming that > a F/B isn't a physical wall. Of course it isn't, but the logical > failure here is in assuming that a wall is the only possible tool > with which to provide an Area Denial capability. > > > > > > > > ...now you tell me all I've found were items "approved > > > > > > for public release", as if I could somehow gain access > > > > > > to the stuff that *isn't*. > > > > > > > > > > Incorrect, for I made no assumptions on your credentials > > > > > > > > As I'm not the person who suggested he 'does' > > > > border security, your new 'whataboutism' here is > > > > just as irrelevant as most of what you've posted. > > > > > > No, you're just complaining that you lack the credentials > > > to be allowed to see anything more than just a narrow slice. > > > > LOL! Do you really think this red herring fools anyone? > > On the contrary: we all knew from the start that there's absolutely > nothing in the world that could be posted online which would result > in you publically reversing your entrenched position. That's why > you're not really my audience. > > > > *You* suggested I search for something that you lead > > me to believe would prove you 'do' border security. I go > > do that and come up with things that don't convince me > > of your expertise on matters ... > > Because of *your* limitations, not mine. > > > ...that too many people doing the job have asked > > for more/better fencing/barrier/wall. > > IIRC, didn't I previously ask for just who this is that's > been asking for only more/better walls? > > In any event, the political rhetoric of walls/fences is a > bad joke if they're serious, because that's a predetermination > to a specific hardware solution before the actual capability > requirements have been defined and analyzed. > > > -hh Only what Prescott Computer Guy wants matters to Prescott Computer Guy. There is nothing Rudy Canoza can do to change that. It's a chance to cause harm and it is what it is. Rudy Canoza created at least 20 KVMS in the last year or so. Without Linux that would not be possible. You guys can only speculate from the perspective of a sociopath. Prescott Computer Guy's posts are nothing but an inconsequential brain dump. It's Prescott Computer Guy's problem but he does not care. Obviously he would rather blame Rudy Canoza than face reality. Did Prescott Computer Guy think that was clever? -- This broke the Internet https://youtu.be/OffkiSAsYo8 https://youtu.be/HMx0RyzbPgQ Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-01 11:50 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <e687dd08-9b3f-4e72-be20-2b670e62ce63@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486366 |
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 12:08:08 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 9:52:56 AM UTC-5, Steve Carroll wrote: > > -hh wrote: > > > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > -hh wrote: > > > > > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > > ... > > > > > > LOL! You sent me on this search... > > > > > > > > > > To which you've now provided independent confirmation > > > > > that I do indeed have publications in DTIC. > > > > > > > > Not quite, what I've provided is a link to a couple of > > > > irrelevant docs that bear a name for which you're > > > > *claiming* the identity. > > > > > > Because posting from the domain that's been registered to that > > > name for the last decade+ suddenly isn't good enough! Shocking! /S > > > > That presumes I believe you're the same person as the name > > being used. > > Which arrogantly presumes that you're the only person that matters. LOL! As you're trying to prove to *me* that you 'do' border security, that is the case in this instance. > > > > You were asked to back > > > > your claim and those 2 docs don't cut it... even if > > > > you were involved with them. > > > > > > Just because you don't know enough to know of applicability > > > doesn't mean that there is none. > > > > Why don't you draw that connection for readers who may > > not "know of applicability" towards your claim that you are > > doing border security. > > Thermal injury risks to the eye includes those from Flash-Bangs; > > <https://www.abc15.com/news/national/border-patrol-official-defends-use-of-tear-gas-on-migrants-at-border-crossing> Oh, yeah... that makes you eminently qualified to assess how much more/less barrier is needed <eyeroll>. Are you totally insane? > > > > > > ...now you tell me all I've found were items "approved > > > > > > for public release", as if I could somehow gain access > > > > > > to the stuff that *isn't*. > > > > > > > > > > Incorrect, for I made no assumptions on your credentials > > > > > > > > As I'm not the person who suggested he 'does' > > > > border security, your new 'whataboutism' here is > > > > just as irrelevant as most of what you've posted. > > > > > > No, you're just complaining that you lack the credentials > > > to be allowed to see anything more than just a narrow slice. > > > > LOL! Do you really think this red herring fools anyone? > > On the contrary: we all knew from the start that there's absolutely > nothing in the world that could be posted online which would result > in you publically reversing your entrenched position. That's why > you're not really my audience. Yet, *I* am the one you sent to fetch this irrelevant info ;) Face it, you're swimming upstream against the people who actually 'do' border security and you're trying to pretend that you're one of them when it's obvious you're not.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-01 13:24 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <e388024a-f52b-4a8a-92d3-1e2dc42dd0bd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486370 |
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 2:50:32 PM UTC-5, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 12:08:08 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: > > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 9:52:56 AM UTC-5, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > -hh wrote: > > > > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > -hh wrote: > > > > > > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > LOL! You sent me on this search... > > > > > > > > > > > > To which you've now provided independent confirmation > > > > > > that I do indeed have publications in DTIC. > > > > > > > > > > Not quite, what I've provided is a link to a couple of > > > > > irrelevant docs that bear a name for which you're > > > > > *claiming* the identity. > > > > > > > > Because posting from the domain that's been registered to that > > > > name for the last decade+ suddenly isn't good enough! Shocking! /S > > > > > > That presumes I believe you're the same person as the name > > > being used. > > > > Which arrogantly presumes that you're the only person that matters. > > LOL! As you're trying to prove to *me* that you 'do' border > security, that is the case in this instance. That's a revisionism attempt. The facts are that you tried to invoke a third party appeal to authority -- one who you never even identified, let alone quoted -- to support your claim: "Not for you, a person who disagrees with all manner of border experts that hold a contrary opinion to yours." I've simply stated that I have professional expertise in that field which supports my positions and I asked you to provide citations which substantiate that which you _claim_. Your response has not been to substantiate your claim, but to ask me to substantiate my background. In good faith, I've provided some substantiation, but you've chosen to reject it as inadequate. In the meantime, you've still not provided your substantiation. Pony up. > > > > > You were asked to back > > > > > your claim and those 2 docs don't cut it... even if > > > > > you were involved with them. > > > > > > > > Just because you don't know enough to know of applicability > > > > doesn't mean that there is none. > > > > > > Why don't you draw that connection for readers who may > > > not "know of applicability" towards your claim that you are > > > doing border security. > > > > Thermal injury risks to the eye includes those from Flash-Bangs; > > > > <https://www.abc15.com/news/national/border-patrol-official-defends-use-of-tear-gas-on-migrants-at-border-crossing> > > Oh, yeah... that makes you eminently qualified to assess > how much more/less barrier is needed <eyeroll>. > Are you totally insane? Nope. Pyrotechnics are just one material solution example which is employed for Area Denial. I didn't claim to be a "walls only" guy. FYI, I'm also not a "sensors only" guy, but I still do understand the capability & CONOP for which the TARS was redeployed to the Mexico border ~five years ago: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tethered_Aerostat_Radar_System> Simply put, it is cheap & effective to monitor crossings in remote regions and just let the crossers cross when they'll self-select themselves to move to strategic chokepoints for arrest (eg, highway). This is a classical "Defense in Depth" where you let them come to you at a place of your choosing and your strategic advantage. > > > > No, you're just complaining that you lack the credentials > > > > to be allowed to see anything more than just a narrow slice. > > > > > > LOL! Do you really think this red herring fools anyone? > > > > On the contrary: we all knew from the start that there's absolutely > > nothing in the world that could be posted online which would result > > in you publically reversing your entrenched position. That's why > > you're not really my audience. > > Yet, *I* am the one you sent to fetch this irrelevant info ;) Well, there's two basic options. The first is that I deliberately sent you on a wild goose chase because you've always been a flaming asshole. And I knew just what you would find and even though it had some relevancy, you would bitch and moan and whine about how it possibly couldn't be ever relevant at all. The second is that I'd forgotten that DTIC is mostly FOUO which is off limits to the general public. > Face it, you're swimming upstream against the people > who actually 'do' border security ... Oh, look: its still some vague external third party authority that Steve's trying to invoke. Wonder if we'll ever get an actual name and quote for what Steve's claimed that they've said? > ...and you're trying to pretend that you're one of them > when it's obvious you're not. Since free hasn't sufficed, pony up the money to do a FOIA request. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-02 11:15 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <64eb356e-2e2d-4931-8e31-a13c3c2ededc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486386 |
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 2:24:20 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 2:50:32 PM UTC-5, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 12:08:08 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: > > > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 9:52:56 AM UTC-5, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > -hh wrote: > > > > > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > > -hh wrote: > > > > > > > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > LOL! You sent me on this search... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To which you've now provided independent confirmation > > > > > > > that I do indeed have publications in DTIC. > > > > > > > > > > > > Not quite, what I've provided is a link to a couple of > > > > > > irrelevant docs that bear a name for which you're > > > > > > *claiming* the identity. > > > > > > > > > > Because posting from the domain that's been registered to that > > > > > name for the last decade+ suddenly isn't good enough! Shocking! /S > > > > > > > > That presumes I believe you're the same person as the name > > > > being used. > > > > > > Which arrogantly presumes that you're the only person that matters. > > > > LOL! As you're trying to prove to *me* that you 'do' border > > security, that is the case in this instance. > > That's a revisionism attempt. LOL! You're just blatantly lying now. Anyone can see that I asked you to prove your claim that you do border security, to which you then pointed in a direction for me to find the proof. So, yes, *I* am the person you provided links to, *I* am the person you sought to prove it to. You, acting like Snit, won't make it all go away ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-02 11:52 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <d043106e-7d63-4b1f-9b94-1e31bebbd03f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486470 |
On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 12:16:00 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 2:24:20 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: > > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 2:50:32 PM UTC-5, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 12:08:08 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: > > > > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 9:52:56 AM UTC-5, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > -hh wrote: > > > > > > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > > > -hh wrote: > > > > > > > > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > LOL! You sent me on this search... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To which you've now provided independent confirmation > > > > > > > > that I do indeed have publications in DTIC. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not quite, what I've provided is a link to a couple of > > > > > > > irrelevant docs that bear a name for which you're > > > > > > > *claiming* the identity. > > > > > > > > > > > > Because posting from the domain that's been registered to that > > > > > > name for the last decade+ suddenly isn't good enough! Shocking! /S > > > > > > > > > > That presumes I believe you're the same person as the name > > > > > being used. > > > > > > > > Which arrogantly presumes that you're the only person that matters. > > > > > > LOL! As you're trying to prove to *me* that you 'do' border > > > security, that is the case in this instance. > > > > That's a revisionism attempt. > > LOL! You're just blatantly lying now. Anyone can see that I asked > you to prove your claim that you do border security, to which you > then pointed in a direction for me to find the proof. So, yes, *I* > am the person you provided links to, *I* am the person you sought > to prove it to. You, acting like Snit, won't make it all go away ;) Real posters will not be seen once the druggies overindulge. That and there will perpetually be a snit thrower or more in an open news group (hint: the Script-Troller). The current tantrum aside, we've all seen who usually lashes out when he doesn't get a catch on his hook. What did Steven Carroll expect from the lying imbecile? That the Script-Troller swine has nothing to lose but time. He has nothing else. Especially not confidence. He lies that he uses Android, while actually he never timed it on anything but an emulator and actually played with it. the Script-Troller must realize that others can go get a Mac, right, medhead? Meanwhile, anyone can filter his posts, which renders *his* trolling harmless, just like the Script-Troller ;) It's like a prank call. the Script-Troller has already decided what he is going to say before he calls. What you say just a reaction. What Steven Carroll says doesn't matter. -- Curious how these posts are made? https://youtu.be/0ZNxaaKD7-c
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-03 19:27 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <gbpm7kF8a1qU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #486470 |
On 2/2/19 12:15 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 2:24:20 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: >> On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 2:50:32 PM UTC-5, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 12:08:08 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: >>>> On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 9:52:56 AM UTC-5, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> -hh wrote: >>>>>> Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>>> -hh wrote: >>>>>>>> Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> LOL! You sent me on this search... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To which you've now provided independent confirmation >>>>>>>> that I do indeed have publications in DTIC. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not quite, what I've provided is a link to a couple of >>>>>>> irrelevant docs that bear a name for which you're >>>>>>> *claiming* the identity. >>>>>> >>>>>> Because posting from the domain that's been registered to that >>>>>> name for the last decade+ suddenly isn't good enough! Shocking! /S >>>>> >>>>> That presumes I believe you're the same person as the name >>>>> being used. >>>> >>>> Which arrogantly presumes that you're the only person that matters. >>> >>> LOL! As you're trying to prove to *me* that you 'do' border >>> security, that is the case in this instance. >> >> That's a revisionism attempt. > > LOL! You're just blatantly lying now. Anyone can see that I asked > you to prove your claim that you do border security, to which you > then pointed in a direction for me to find the proof. So, yes, *I* > am the person you provided links to, *I* am the person you sought > to prove it to. You, acting like Snit, won't make it all go away ;) > What claim did I make here that you think I did not support? Oh. You are just begging for attention again. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-03 19:28 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <gbpm9kF8a1qU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #486370 |
On 2/1/19 12:50 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 12:08:08 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: >> On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 9:52:56 AM UTC-5, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> -hh wrote: >>>> Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> -hh wrote: >>>>>> Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>> LOL! You sent me on this search... >>>>>> >>>>>> To which you've now provided independent confirmation >>>>>> that I do indeed have publications in DTIC. >>>>> >>>>> Not quite, what I've provided is a link to a couple of >>>>> irrelevant docs that bear a name for which you're >>>>> *claiming* the identity. >>>> >>>> Because posting from the domain that's been registered to that >>>> name for the last decade+ suddenly isn't good enough! Shocking! /S >>> >>> That presumes I believe you're the same person as the name >>> being used. >> >> Which arrogantly presumes that you're the only person that matters. > > LOL! As you're trying to prove to *me* that you 'do' border > security, that is the case in this instance. > >>>>> You were asked to back >>>>> your claim and those 2 docs don't cut it... even if >>>>> you were involved with them. >>>> >>>> Just because you don't know enough to know of applicability >>>> doesn't mean that there is none. >>> >>> Why don't you draw that connection for readers who may >>> not "know of applicability" towards your claim that you are >>> doing border security. >> >> Thermal injury risks to the eye includes those from Flash-Bangs; >> >> <https://www.abc15.com/news/national/border-patrol-official-defends-use-of-tear-gas-on-migrants-at-border-crossing> > > Oh, yeah... that makes you eminently qualified to assess > how much more/less barrier is needed <eyeroll>. > Are you totally insane? > >>>>>>> ...now you tell me all I've found were items "approved >>>>>>> for public release", as if I could somehow gain access >>>>>>> to the stuff that *isn't*. >>>>>> >>>>>> Incorrect, for I made no assumptions on your credentials >>>>> >>>>> As I'm not the person who suggested he 'does' >>>>> border security, your new 'whataboutism' here is >>>>> just as irrelevant as most of what you've posted. >>>> >>>> No, you're just complaining that you lack the credentials >>>> to be allowed to see anything more than just a narrow slice. >>> >>> LOL! Do you really think this red herring fools anyone? >> >> On the contrary: we all knew from the start that there's absolutely >> nothing in the world that could be posted online which would result >> in you publically reversing your entrenched position. That's why >> you're not really my audience. > > Yet, *I* am the one you sent to fetch this irrelevant info ;) > > Face it, you're swimming upstream against the people > who actually 'do' border security and you're trying to > pretend that you're one of them when it's obvious > you're not. > You are begging for him to share things about his life. Are you looking to stalk and harass him as you did me? Do you need your family and the police to remind you how this is not a good choice in your life? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-01 20:25 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <11p9a00a8ba.32hou@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #486366 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > > In any event, the political rhetoric of walls/fences is a > bad joke if they're serious, because that's a predetermination > to a specific hardware solution before the actual capability > requirements have been defined and analyzed. > Problem: How to keep people from walking across border. Solution: OMG HOW CAN WE POSSIBLY DO THIS CALL DARPA!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-01 14:31 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <00b95eh625vfphvcbr8iklirgohobks5rg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #486378 |
owl wrote: > -hh wrote: >> >> In any event, the political rhetoric of walls/fences is a >> bad joke if they're serious, because that's a predetermination >> to a specific hardware solution before the actual capability >> requirements have been defined and analyzed. > >Problem: How to keep people from walking across border. >Solution: OMG HOW CAN WE POSSIBLY DO THIS CALL DARPA! Yeah, that was classic -highhorse. -- "China is still here." - "GreyCloud", providing "evidence" that The Great Wall worked as intended.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-01 13:28 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <55376159-f70b-40d0-ae08-c60ee6c3c452@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486379 |
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 3:31:35 PM UTC-5, chrisv wrote: > owl wrote: > > > -hh wrote: > >> > >> In any event, the political rhetoric of walls/fences is a > >> bad joke if they're serious, because that's a predetermination > >> to a specific hardware solution before the actual capability > >> requirements have been defined and analyzed. > > > >Problem: How to keep people from walking across border. > >Solution: OMG HOW CAN WE POSSIBLY DO THIS CALL DARPA! > > Yeah, that was classic -highhorse. Thanks for that reminder, because posting last month from a DARPA IP Address may help to also address owl's cynicism. Of course, he would try to argue that it still doesn't prove that I am me, but whoever me is, did attend DARPA. And even if it was as a janitor, that's a far bigger life accomplishment than that which owl, Steve, chrisv have proven! ;-P -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-01 13:56 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <2e19188c-e13a-477c-9375-dd0e8fe4261d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486388 |
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 2:28:25 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 3:31:35 PM UTC-5, chrisv wrote: > > owl wrote: > > > > > -hh wrote: > > >> > > >> In any event, the political rhetoric of walls/fences is a > > >> bad joke if they're serious, because that's a predetermination > > >> to a specific hardware solution before the actual capability > > >> requirements have been defined and analyzed. > > > > > >Problem: How to keep people from walking across border. > > >Solution: OMG HOW CAN WE POSSIBLY DO THIS CALL DARPA! > > > > Yeah, that was classic -highhorse. > > Thanks for that reminder, because posting last month from a > DARPA IP Address may help to also address owl's cynicism. > > Of course, he would try to argue that it still doesn't prove > that I am me, but whoever me is, did attend DARPA. And even > if it was as a janitor, that's a far bigger life accomplishment > than that which owl, Steve, chrisv have proven! ;-P > > > -hh I have known turnips who argue better than you do. You haven't been following him to completely ascertain the depths of the guy's perversion. No no. Steven Petruzzellis never agreed to stop flooding. He lied about his trolling which surprised nobody. Oh my! Right, Steven Petruzzellis is looking to produce an XML variable, which Rudy Canoza can get in seconds, that I taught myself. If he wasn't so lost he would get how dumb he looks. - "You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention" Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-01 22:04 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <s9z0b0803ag.a3gho4@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #486388 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 3:31:35 PM UTC-5, chrisv wrote: >> owl wrote: >> >> > -hh wrote: >> >> >> >> In any event, the political rhetoric of walls/fences is a >> >> bad joke if they're serious, because that's a predetermination >> >> to a specific hardware solution before the actual capability >> >> requirements have been defined and analyzed. >> > >> >Problem: How to keep people from walking across border. >> >Solution: OMG HOW CAN WE POSSIBLY DO THIS CALL DARPA! >> >> Yeah, that was classic -highhorse. > > Thanks for that reminder, because posting last month from a > DARPA IP Address may help to also address owl's cynicism. > > Of course, he would try to argue that it still doesn't prove > that I am me, but whoever me is, did attend DARPA. And even > if it was as a janitor, that's a far bigger life accomplishment > than that which owl, Steve, chrisv have proven! ;-P > Oooohhh. A DARPA IP address. You mean like this? (look up). All their base are belong to us.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-01 14:27 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <7e279ea0-aa5e-4c83-947a-c0135178367f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486390 |
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 3:04:19 PM UTC-7, owl wrote: > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 3:31:35 PM UTC-5, chrisv wrote: > >> owl wrote: > >> > >> > -hh wrote: > >> >> > >> >> In any event, the political rhetoric of walls/fences is a > >> >> bad joke if they're serious, because that's a predetermination > >> >> to a specific hardware solution before the actual capability > >> >> requirements have been defined and analyzed. > >> > > >> >Problem: How to keep people from walking across border. > >> >Solution: OMG HOW CAN WE POSSIBLY DO THIS CALL DARPA! > >> > >> Yeah, that was classic -highhorse. > > > > Thanks for that reminder, because posting last month from a > > DARPA IP Address may help to also address owl's cynicism. > > > > Of course, he would try to argue that it still doesn't prove > > that I am me, but whoever me is, did attend DARPA. And even > > if it was as a janitor, that's a far bigger life accomplishment > > than that which owl, Steve, chrisv have proven! ;-P > > > > Oooohhh. A DARPA IP address. You mean like this? (look up). > All their base are belong to us. In fact Klaus Schadenfreude's lies got bigger. So as might be expected I regret assisting Klaus Schadenfreude. While I am sure he loved it, being nice to him made things worse. He is a jerk; most people have plonked his socks. What he really needs is a bot that keeps switching names, then they'd have a possibility at being a fraction as bothersome as he is. You wishing for something does not make it true. Regardless of my reasoned dislike of Slrn, I even now continue to use it for newbies who have had difficulties with Windows 7. Lines of text containing hints and signs. By getting an education from 'lawyers' like that you get moral imperatives like 'liberalism'. Carried to its (il)logical progression, the push that it's 'gross' for a traditional dude to not wish to identify as a child is instituted. -- Live on Kickstarter! https://youtu.be/lF8yk7ul4Mw https://youtu.be/E3m_i-x92D0 http://tinyurl.com/proof-about-ebot Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tommy B <riceornice8p@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-01 23:11 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <q32jmp$1b0a$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #486390 |
On Fri, 01 Feb 2019 22:04:17 +0000, owl wrote: > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >> On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 3:31:35 PM UTC-5, chrisv wrote: >>> owl wrote: >>> >>> > -hh wrote: >>> >> >>> >> In any event, the political rhetoric of walls/fences is a bad joke >>> >> if they're serious, because that's a predetermination to a specific >>> >> hardware solution before the actual capability requirements have >>> >> been defined and analyzed. >>> > >>> >Problem: How to keep people from walking across border. >>> >Solution: OMG HOW CAN WE POSSIBLY DO THIS CALL DARPA! >>> >>> Yeah, that was classic -highhorse. >> >> Thanks for that reminder, because posting last month from a DARPA IP >> Address may help to also address owl's cynicism. >> >> Of course, he would try to argue that it still doesn't prove that I am >> me, but whoever me is, did attend DARPA. And even if it was as a >> janitor, that's a far bigger life accomplishment than that which owl, >> Steve, chrisv have proven! ;-P >> >> > Oooohhh. A DARPA IP address. You mean like this? (look up). > All their base are belong to us. This pompous assclown "hh" must enjoy being made a fool of. First Steve Carroll and now you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-01 15:15 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <6940955b-a7a9-40b3-b43d-237ed6944a70@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486395 |
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 4:11:26 PM UTC-7, Tommy B wrote: > On Fri, 01 Feb 2019 22:04:17 +0000, owl wrote: > > > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > >> On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 3:31:35 PM UTC-5, chrisv wrote: > >>> owl wrote: > >>> > >>> > -hh wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> In any event, the political rhetoric of walls/fences is a bad joke > >>> >> if they're serious, because that's a predetermination to a specific > >>> >> hardware solution before the actual capability requirements have > >>> >> been defined and analyzed. > >>> > > >>> >Problem: How to keep people from walking across border. > >>> >Solution: OMG HOW CAN WE POSSIBLY DO THIS CALL DARPA! > >>> > >>> Yeah, that was classic -highhorse. > >> > >> Thanks for that reminder, because posting last month from a DARPA IP > >> Address may help to also address owl's cynicism. > >> > >> Of course, he would try to argue that it still doesn't prove that I am > >> me, but whoever me is, did attend DARPA. And even if it was as a > >> janitor, that's a far bigger life accomplishment than that which owl, > >> Steve, chrisv have proven! ;-P > >> > >> > > Oooohhh. A DARPA IP address. You mean like this? (look up). > > All their base are belong to us. > > This pompous assclown "hh" must enjoy being made a fool of. > First Steve Carroll and now you. Who are you even talking to? Thus, my first statement stands literal and correct. It was bigdog who was openly asking how better to better his scams. What is your evidence? Over and over, the refrain is he wants to "talk tech", but the guy spends most of his time whining about "obsession". You likely think KDE handles the desktop well. Nope. Not compared to Windows. This is something you merely pretend to understand. -- Do not click this link!!! http://www.5z8.info/--INITIATE-CREDIT-CARD-XFER--_k7s1jt_inject_worm Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-01 21:48 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <97f83627-e7c1-48d3-9382-b2f5ec13138e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486396 |
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 4:15:32 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 4:11:26 PM UTC-7, Tommy B wrote: > > On Fri, 01 Feb 2019 22:04:17 +0000, owl wrote: > > > > > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > > >> On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 3:31:35 PM UTC-5, chrisv wrote: > > >>> owl wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > -hh wrote: > > >>> >> > > >>> >> In any event, the political rhetoric of walls/fences is a bad joke > > >>> >> if they're serious, because that's a predetermination to a specific > > >>> >> hardware solution before the actual capability requirements have > > >>> >> been defined and analyzed. > > >>> > > > >>> >Problem: How to keep people from walking across border. > > >>> >Solution: OMG HOW CAN WE POSSIBLY DO THIS CALL DARPA! > > >>> > > >>> Yeah, that was classic -highhorse. > > >> > > >> Thanks for that reminder, because posting last month from a DARPA IP > > >> Address may help to also address owl's cynicism. > > >> > > >> Of course, he would try to argue that it still doesn't prove that I am > > >> me, but whoever me is, did attend DARPA. And even if it was as a > > >> janitor, that's a far bigger life accomplishment than that which owl, > > >> Steve, chrisv have proven! ;-P > > >> > > >> > > > Oooohhh. A DARPA IP address. You mean like this? (look up). > > > All their base are belong to us. > > > > This pompous assclown "hh" must enjoy being made a fool of. > > First Steve Carroll and now you. > > > > Who are you even talking to? Thus, my first statement stands literal and correct. > > It was bigdog who was openly asking how better to better his scams. > > What is your evidence? > > Over and over, the refrain is he wants to "talk tech", but the guy spends most of his time whining about "obsession". You likely think KDE handles the desktop well. Nope. Not compared to Windows. This is something you merely pretend to understand. > > -- > Do not click this link!!! > http://www.5z8.info/--INITIATE-CREDIT-CARD-XFER--_k7s1jt_inject_worm > Jonas Eklundh Communication AB Only what Sigmond wants matters to Sigmond. There is nothing Klaus Schadenfreude can do to change that. It's a personality defect and it is what it is. Don't look now, but I think Sigmond has a serious brocrush on Klaus Schadenfreude. Who are you even speaking to? Nobody gets it, I barely understand it. I have a custom setup I use as well, but it's a bit different. - I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened http://www.5z8.info/--INITIATE-CREDIT-CARD-XFER--_k7s1jt_inject_worm Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-02 07:42 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <2cd82604-f92b-433d-a648-27f7d0b787f8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486419 |
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 10:48:52 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 4:15:32 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 4:11:26 PM UTC-7, Tommy B wrote: > > > On Fri, 01 Feb 2019 22:04:17 +0000, owl wrote: > > > > > > > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > > > >> On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 3:31:35 PM UTC-5, chrisv wrote: > > > >>> owl wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> > -hh wrote: > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> In any event, the political rhetoric of walls/fences is a bad joke > > > >>> >> if they're serious, because that's a predetermination to a specific > > > >>> >> hardware solution before the actual capability requirements have > > > >>> >> been defined and analyzed. > > > >>> > > > > >>> >Problem: How to keep people from walking across border. > > > >>> >Solution: OMG HOW CAN WE POSSIBLY DO THIS CALL DARPA! > > > >>> > > > >>> Yeah, that was classic -highhorse. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks for that reminder, because posting last month from a DARPA IP > > > >> Address may help to also address owl's cynicism. > > > >> > > > >> Of course, he would try to argue that it still doesn't prove that I am > > > >> me, but whoever me is, did attend DARPA. And even if it was as a > > > >> janitor, that's a far bigger life accomplishment than that which owl, > > > >> Steve, chrisv have proven! ;-P > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Oooohhh. A DARPA IP address. You mean like this? (look up). > > > > All their base are belong to us. > > > > > > This pompous assclown "hh" must enjoy being made a fool of. > > > First Steve Carroll and now you. > > > > > > > > Who are you even talking to? Thus, my first statement stands literal and correct. > > > > It was bigdog who was openly asking how better to better his scams. > > > > What is your evidence? > > > > Over and over, the refrain is he wants to "talk tech", but the guy spends most of his time whining about "obsession". You likely think KDE handles the desktop well. Nope. Not compared to Windows. This is something you merely pretend to understand. > > > > -- > > Do not click this link!!! > > http://www.5z8.info/--INITIATE-CREDIT-CARD-XFER--_k7s1jt_inject_worm > > Jonas Eklundh Communication AB > > > > Only what Sigmond wants matters to Sigmond. There is nothing Klaus Schadenfreude can do to change that. It's a personality defect and it is what it is. Don't look now, but I think Sigmond has a serious brocrush on Klaus Schadenfreude. > > Who are you even speaking to? > > Nobody gets it, I barely understand it. I have a custom setup I use as well, but it's a bit different. > > > > - > I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened > http://www.5z8.info/--INITIATE-CREDIT-CARD-XFER--_k7s1jt_inject_worm > Jonas Eklundh Communication This forum is a leaking porta potty. Jonas Eklundh's computer has more hard drives than Rudy Canoza's. Jonas Eklundh wins. Rudy Canoza loses. Any questions? Just absurd trolling. And I am rewarding that trolling. THAT is what the "Rudy Canoza circus" is. Complete tripe by an uneducated, misleading, Machiavellian, collaborating bozo who couldn't tell the truth if his life depended on it. Who *doesn't* know that this kind of drivel is Rudy Canoza's approach, not the approach of Jonas Eklundh? It is all just projection... the trolling, the forging, the writing of nonsense, the animosity... the diaper rash and eagerness to show how embarrassed he is over being kicked from the schoolyard for pissing in it again... all of it ;) Another successful Unity test. That is if you count the lowest common denominator of usage as a success. -- Top 15 Ways Rudy Canoza Trolls http://www.5z8.info/--INITIATE-CREDIT-CARD-XFER--_k7s1jt_inject_worm https://youtu.be/GPPqvw8iEBs Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-04 07:11 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Satan's Playground ? New York |
| Message-ID | <c9eg5ehv7b220mggvd8gffoklmqa0r6rrh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #486395 |
Tommy B wrote: > (snip) -highhorse is an asshole, no doubt, but the claimed opinion of a spineless nym-shifter, like you, means nothing at all. -- "What if the user has 4000 files on a recent used file list?" - some thing
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web