Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #684189

Re: Manjaro

From p.dean@invalid.net (Peter Dean)
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Manjaro
Date 2025-01-17 04:48 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <vmcne4$3ti7e$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <3XPhP.178097$FOb4.105024@fx15.iad> <vma4h2$3cep3$1@dont-email.me> <s38iP.189209$FOb4.34325@fx15.iad>

Show all headers | View raw

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 1/16/25 12:13 AM, Peter Dean wrote:
>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> Why the heck would anyone use anything else?
>>>
>>> 1) NVIDIA is supported out of the box and works perfectly.
>>> 2) Wake from suspend works consistently.
>>> 3) Unlike Fedora, waking from sleep won't maximize brightness before
>>> turning off the backlight entirely.
>>> 4) Unlike Ubuntu-based distributions like Pop!_OS, opening up an
>>> application doesn't momentarily freeze the computer.
>>>
>>> Seriously, does anyone know of an issue with this distribution? I can't
>>> yet find one.
>>>
>> 
>> Manjaro is pointless.  Just use arch.
> 
> As it is, Manjaro is robust and user-friendly. Arch makes no guarantee 
> to its stability and is anything but friendly to the user.
> 

You have that backwards.  Your Manjaro is far more likely to break than arch.
And user friendly?  What does that even mean?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyADkmRVe0U

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Manjaro CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-15 09:50 -0500
  Re: Manjaro p.dean@invalid.net (Peter Dean) - 2025-01-16 05:13 +0000
    Re: Manjaro CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-16 08:44 -0500
      Re: Manjaro p.dean@invalid.net (Peter Dean) - 2025-01-17 04:48 +0000
        Re: Manjaro RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 07:04 +0000
        Re: Manjaro CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-17 08:48 -0500
    Re: Manjaro RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 07:01 +0000
  Re: Manjaro RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 07:01 +0000
    Re: Manjaro RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 07:30 +0000
      Re: Manjaro p.dean@invalid.net (Peter Dean) - 2025-01-17 08:26 +0000
        Re: Manjaro RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 02:07 +0000

csiph-web