Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #330554
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere |
| Date | 2015-11-03 01:13 +0000 |
| Organization | O.W.L. |
| Message-ID | <sfhe48.0af@rooftop.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <D25D4DBF.6278F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <asdf3.a93a@rooftop.invalid> <D25D53D8.627A7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <srheua.93a@rooftop.invalid> <D25D56CA.627BD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/2/15, 6:00 PM, in article srheua.93a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/2/15, 5:47 PM, in article asdf3.a93a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 11/2/15, 5:14 PM, in article sfhj39a.ara3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/2/15, 4:36 PM, in article seruf03ax.sa@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>> ... >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is it scientific not to allow discussion? Evolution is a theory, not >>>>>>>> a fact. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Curious: what do YOU mean by "evolution is a theory, not a fact"? Do you >>>>>>> even know what a scientific theory is? I bet not. >>>>>> >>>>>> Let me know when scientists create a living organism in a laboratory >>>>>> using just the chemical building blocks. >>>>> >>>>> If this is truly of interest to you then you can set up a Google news alert >>>>> for it... I am not going to contact you with any such news! But back to the >>>>> topic: I think it is clear you have no idea what a scientific theory even >>>>> is >>>>> - if you had you would have answered the question. But I shall give you >>>>> another chance: what do YOU think a scientific theory is? >>> >>> And you have no answer: you have NO clue what a theory is. Fine. That was my >>> point: you put evolution down for being a theory but you do not even know >>> what a scientific theory is! >> >> If it's a scientific theory, then it should be able make predictions. >> >>>> Are we going to evolve into something else? Can Evolutionary Theory >>>> predict what that something else is? >>> >> >> No answer to this question. Apparently Evolutionary Theory cannot make >> any predictions with its own model. > > I have no obligation to follow your ever off topic question. Comes down to > you have no idea what a scientific theory is yet use the idea that evolution > is a theory as something bad. > If it's not predictive, what good is it? > Complete ignorance on your part. > You are claiming this non-science is science. So show how it follows the Scientific Method.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-02 07:56 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 14:18 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 09:35 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 17:52 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 10:22 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 17:59 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 21:48 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 11:09 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 11:15 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 21:44 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 14:51 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-02 22:35 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-02 23:03 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-02 23:36 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 00:14 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 01:00 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 01:13 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 01:39 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:16 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:50 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 03:25 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 04:41 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 09:29 -0800
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 17:44 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 17:53 -0500
csiph-web