Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #243490
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: OT: Global Climate Change Debate |
| Date | 2014-05-13 20:35 +0000 |
| Organization | OK by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand |
| Message-ID | <ghem.a3p0@rooftop.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <CF97B9C5.372F4%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <hgu00a3.gf@rooftop.invalid> <CF97C414.37309%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <nvhd00a.3r@rooftop.invalid> <CF97CD89.3731C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 5/13/14, 12:52 PM, in article nvhd00a.3r@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>> <http://goo.gl/6LV04> [Slate.com] >>> ----- >>> First of all, why do people believe conspiracy theories? >>> >>> There are number of factors, but probably one of the most >>> important ones in this instance is that, paradoxically, it gives >>> people a sense of control. People hate randomness, they dread the >>> sort of random occurrences that can destroy their lives, so as a >>> mechanism against that dread, it turns out that it¹s much easier >>> to believe in a conspiracy. Then you have someone to blame, it¹s >>> not just randomness. >>> >>> What are the psychological forces at play in conspiracy thinking? >>> >>> Basically what¹s happening in any conspiracy theory is that people >>> have a need or a motivation to believe in this theory, and it¹s >>> psychologically different from evidence-based thinking. A >>> conspiracy theory is immune to evidence, and that can pretty well >>> serve as the definition of one. If you reject evidence, or >>> reinterpret the evidence to be confirmation of your theory, or you >>> ignore mountains of evidence to focus on just one thing, you¹re >>> probably a conspiracy theorist. We call that a self-sealing nature >>> of reasoning. >>> ----- >>> >>> That is why you believe your conspiracy theories. >> >> Slate dot com == a bunch of insane faggots, so I guess your latest appeal- >> to-authority logical fallacy just blew up in your face. > > It is a lovely explanation for your belief in idiotic conspiracy theories. > But if you want others, here you go (and, yes, I know none of this will stop > you from pushing your irrational BS... your beliefs in conspiracy nonsense > help you deal with your feelings of being out of control): > > <http://goo.gl/f3pqK2> [Psychology Today] > ----- Psychology Today? Really? Have you ever met *anyone* in the field of pyschology who didn't start life as a kook and spend the rest of it seeking to find out what the fuck was wrong with them? <snip remainder of appeal-to-authority logical fallacies>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
OT: Global Climate Change Debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:40 -0700
Re: OT: Global Climate Change Debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 12:25 +0000
Re: OT: Global Climate Change Debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: OT: Global Climate Change Debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 09:35 -0700
Re: OT: Global Climate Change Debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 18:40 +0000
Re: OT: Global Climate Change Debate Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 14:43 -0400
Re: OT: Global Climate Change Debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 18:52 +0000
Re: OT: Global Climate Change Debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 12:00 -0700
Re: OT: Global Climate Change Debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 19:34 +0000
Re: OT: Global Climate Change Debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 12:44 -0700
Re: OT: Global Climate Change Debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 19:52 +0000
Re: OT: Global Climate Change Debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 13:24 -0700
Re: OT: Global Climate Change Debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 20:35 +0000
Re: OT: Global Climate Change Debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 13:55 -0700
Re: OT: Global Climate Change Debate GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-13 15:29 -0600
Re: OT: Global Climate Change Debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 14:29 -0700
Re: OT: Global Climate Change Debate GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-13 15:28 -0600
Re: OT: Global Climate Change Debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 14:30 -0700
Re: OT: Global Climate Change Debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 12:01 -0700
Re: OT: Global Climate Change Debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 11:44 -0700
csiph-web