Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366160

Re: If you see a liberal

Path csiph.com!xmission!news.alt.net!not-for-mail
From "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: If you see a liberal
Date Sun, 21 Aug 2016 06:00:12 +0000 (UTC)
Organization O.W.L.
Lines 31
Message-ID <fhgkcsof983.aji@perch.invalid> (permalink)
References <ghjadiw93r.age@perch.invalid> <D3DE5419.79B8C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <fhvcms1df.lo83ah@perch.invalid> <D3DE6391.79B9B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <adfhjvc.mzcv893@perch.invalid> <D3DE6AED.79BA2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <fhjdsa983.v@perch.invalid> <D3DE75EC.79BAE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <fhjau0v83.ag32tt@perch.invalid> <D3DE86AC.79BBC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <fhjcis983.ajfu@perch.invalid> <D3DE8F53.79BC3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host common.perch.invalid
Xref csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:366160

Show key headers only | View raw

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/20/16, 10:21 PM, in article fhjcis983.ajfu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
> ...
>>>> I don't shun the rule of law.
>>> 
>>> Look at the start of the thread. You threw law and morality away to not only
>>> wish death on people but to call on others to engage in violence based on a
>>> video you saw depicting a small number of people acting poorly.
>> 
>> You libtard monkeys act like that everywhere you go.
> 
> See: from you we get name calling and attacks against whole groups of people
> based on the action of a very few. Reminds me of how many in the US attack
> all Muslims. A tiny, tiny fraction act poorly so ALL are deemed bad. Same
> with other groups: Christians, blacks, whites, atheists, etc.
> 
> It is reprehensible and AGAINST the rule of law and basic morality.
> 
>>> There is no defense for your actions... other than to say you were just
>>> trolling.
>> 
>> I stand by my words.
> 
> Hence why you are a self-described hypocrite.
> 

Nope.  I'm for rule of law.  We just need a law that says all liberals
must shower.  Does Zykon B work on cockroaches?

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-20 22:17 +0000
  Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 16:56 -0700
    Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 00:18 +0000
      Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 17:27 -0700
        Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 00:49 +0000
          Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 18:38 -0700
            Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 01:51 +0000
              Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 19:44 -0700
                Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 03:08 +0000
                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 20:15 -0700
                Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 03:34 +0000
                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 21:02 -0700
                Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 04:22 +0000
                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 22:14 -0700
                Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 05:21 +0000
                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 22:50 -0700
                Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 06:00 +0000
                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 23:16 -0700
                Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 06:35 +0000
                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 10:01 -0700
                Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 07:58 -0400
                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:19 -0700
            Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 07:54 -0400
              Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:16 -0700
          Re: If you see a liberal DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 01:07 -0400
            Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 05:15 +0000
              Re: If you see a liberal DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 09:35 -0400
                Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 15:13 +0000
                Re: If you see a liberal Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-21 12:22 -0400
                Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-21 11:06 -0600
                Re: If you see a liberal DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 18:38 -0400
                Re: If you see a liberal Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-21 19:08 -0400
                Re: If you see a liberal chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-22 06:59 -0500
                So, now you are an outhouse attendent? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-22 12:23 -0600
        Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-21 11:04 -0600
          Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 10:08 -0700
            Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 18:42 +0000
              Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 12:25 -0700
              Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-22 12:25 -0600
                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 11:39 -0700
                Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 11:53 -0600
                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:07 -0700
                Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:54 -0600
                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:40 -0700
                Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 08:36 -0400
                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:24 -0700
            Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-22 12:24 -0600
              Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 11:26 -0700
                Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 11:55 -0600
                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:05 -0700
                Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:54 -0600
                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:38 -0700
                Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:09 -0400
                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:25 -0700
                Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 14:09 -0600
                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:20 -0700
        Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 07:52 -0400
          Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:15 -0700
  Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-21 11:03 -0600
  Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 07:49 -0400
    Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 15:54 +0000
    Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:19 -0700
      Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 17:33 +0000
        Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:39 -0700
          Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 17:46 +0000
            Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:01 -0700
            Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:41 -0400
              Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:51 -0700
              Re: If you see a liberal Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 12:22 -0700
                Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 16:00 -0400
                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:04 -0700
        Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:39 -0400
          Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 18:54 +0000

csiph-web