Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #341814

Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue

From owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue
Date 2016-01-26 23:20 +0000
Organization O.W.L.
Message-ID <fhgjeuoa03.fa@rooftop.invalid> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <n85eit$82p$2@dont-email.me> <ghjsoe03.ap2@rooftop.invalid> <n88g46$k5e$2@dont-email.me> <gjdkcmnb893.a3@rooftop.invalid> <n88r59$35m$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> wrote:
> On 2016-01-26 4:16 PM, owl wrote:
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>> On 1/26/2016 10:54 AM, owl wrote:
>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 1/19/2016 4:48 AM, owl wrote:
>>>>>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 13/01/2016 13:31, John Gohde wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, January 5, 2016 at 6:51:01 AM UTC-5, Desk Rabbit wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 04/01/2016 19:58, Vile Strong wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> One of the highly useful capabilities of the Linux OS is
>>>>>>>>>> the tmpfs, which is a temporary file system located entirely
>>>>>>>>>> in RAM.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The user can invoke a tmpfs any time and of any size with
>>>>>>>>>> the command:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> mount -t tmpfs -o size=XG,mode=0777 tmpfs /mount-point
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A tmpfs can be used for a variety of purposes, such as the speedy
>>>>>>>>>> compile of a large program or a very quick "scratch" storage
>>>>>>>>>> for very large data processing.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Does Microsoft Windows have this capability?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> FUCK NO!!!!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's another testament to the superiority of Linux over
>>>>>>>>>> Microsoft.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And of course, your given example doesn't work
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [root@mail ~]# mount -t tmpfs -o size=XG,mode=0777 tmpfs /mnt/tmpfs
>>>>>>>>> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on tmpfs,
>>>>>>>>>            missing codepage or helper program, or other error
>>>>>>>>>            (for several filesystems (e.g. nfs, cifs) you might
>>>>>>>>>            need a /sbin/mount.<type> helper program)
>>>>>>>>>            In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
>>>>>>>>>            dmesg | tail  or so
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's the size=XG that's wrong, you need to specify a number i.e. 1G for
>>>>>>>>> one gigabyte.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OR IF YOU HAD A BRAIN, rodent, the ue of an "X" script should have been self-explanatory.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh do explain what an "X" script is in this context great Linux master.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This should be good........
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It can't possibly be as good as you running a command as root without
>>>>>> scrutinizing it first.  :)
>>>>>
>>>>> mount needs "scrutinizing"?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You be the judge.
>>>>
>>>> root@lowtide:~# mount |grep sda1
>>>> /dev/sda1 on / type ext4 (rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,data=ordered)
>>>> /dev/sda1 on /mnt/blah type ext4 (rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,data=ordered)
>>>> root@lowtide:~# cat /foo
>>>> cat: /foo: No such file or directory
>>>> root@lowtide:~# echo "nah" > /mnt/blah/foo
>>>> root@lowtide:~# cat /foo
>>>> nah
>>>> root@lowtide:~#
>>>
>>>
>>> geeekkkk!!!!
>>>
>>> Plus, you pulled a twerp move and contrived a bogus mount scenario. 
>>> Back to the basement you go.
>>>
>> 
>> Not bogus.  If the intent was to mount /dev/sdb1 under /mnt/blah,
>> not scrutinizing the mount command could lead to disaster. 
> 
> Thought you'd be interested in this:
> <http://www.ronpaul.com/2016-01-25/congress-is-writing-the-president-a-blank-check-for-war/>
> 

They're just calling Obama's bluff.  He asked for a new AUMF.  He won't
do anything.  Merkel won't let him.
 

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 05:31 -0800
  Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-01-18 10:34 +0000
    Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-19 09:48 +0000
      Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-01-20 15:07 +0000
        Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-20 19:23 +0000
          Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-01-21 09:44 +0000
            Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-21 10:48 +0000
              Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-01-21 11:05 +0000
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-21 13:11 +0000
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-01-21 16:52 +0000
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-21 18:30 +0000
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-01-22 09:47 +0000
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-01-22 14:11 +0100
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-22 12:59 -0500
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-01-22 22:33 +0100
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-01-22 15:22 -0700
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-23 09:34 -0500
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-25 07:19 -0600
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-25 08:59 -0500
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-01-25 10:22 -0500
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-01-25 14:58 +0000
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-01-25 11:23 -0500
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-01-25 18:38 +0100
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-25 12:52 -0500
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:58 -0500
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-25 17:35 -0500
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-26 18:39 +0000
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-03-22 11:35 -0700
      Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-25 10:24 -0500
        Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-01-25 15:36 +0000
          Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-25 11:18 -0500
            Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-26 15:58 +0000
          Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-26 17:16 +0000
        Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-26 15:54 +0000
          Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-26 14:09 -0500
            Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-26 21:16 +0000
              Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-01-26 17:17 -0500
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-26 23:20 +0000
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-01-27 12:11 -0700
                Re: Linux Tmpfs Virtue owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-27 21:26 +0000

csiph-web