Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #467165
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.14--3.13pm.Seattle.2018> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <E4GdnYJxhuqNdQfGnZ2dnUU7-TnNnZ2d@giganews.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.13--4.00pm.Seattle.2018> <q8Wdneocv4m-RAbGnZ2dnUU7-bHNnZ2d@giganews.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.14--1.00pm.Seattle.2018> <6b2dnUSMse1MiwHGnZ2dnUU7-K_NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.checkmate |
| Subject | The tastiest soup in a putrid swamp. |
| Organization | usenet-news.net |
| Date | 2018-09-14 15:13 -0700 |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
> can you explain why you believe that M-theory is "random" and "useless"?
"M-theory" isn't a theory, like evolution;
it's just the latest roll of the dice.
> Why-is-M-Theory-the-leading-candidate-for-theory-of-everything ?
Because it's the tastiest soup in a putrid swamp.
2016, NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope found
the brightest objects known to man: gamma-ray blazars,
Two Trillion times the sun's output.
They're young, of course, just 1.4 billion years old,
multi-billion-solar-mass black holes, in "Active Galactic Nuclei".
Like The Known Universe itself, blazars had more exergy,
less entropy, when they were younger.
At the start, there was "no entropy" ("no time, no space"), just "eXergy"
( a type of energy that can do physical work, force * distance ).
Everything decays, even gravity; hence the arrow of time.
Entropy converts blazars into SpaceTime. Gravity is residual eXergy.
Eventually, this eXergy will be consumed away, replaced with entropy,
leaving us with a uniform heat bath that has all of the energy
but none of the eXergy.
Einstein's Cosmological Constant ( 1.11 * 10^−52 / Meters^2 ) tells us
that outer space is growing EXPONENTIALLY, gravity is dying off;
-- i.e. the "Heat Death" predicted by Lord Kelvin, 1852,
is the most likley outcome.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"String Theory" is a useless, unfalsifiable, random hypothesis. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-13 15:09 -0700
Re: "String Theory" is a useless, unfalsifiable, random hypothesis. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-13 17:10 -0500
"String Theory" is a useless, unfalsifiable, random hypothesis. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-13 15:31 -0700
Re: "String Theory" is a useless, unfalsifiable, random hypothesis. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 15:33 -0700
Re: "String Theory" is a useless, unfalsifiable, random hypothesis. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-13 17:44 -0500
Re: "String Theory" is a useless, unfalsifiable, random hypothesis. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-13 17:43 -0500
Too many paint chips. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-13 16:00 -0700
Re: Too many paint chips. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-14 10:52 -0500
StrawMan Inc. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-14 13:00 -0700
Re: StrawMan Inc. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-14 15:15 -0500
The tastiest soup in a putrid swamp. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-14 15:13 -0700
Re: "String Theory" is a useless, unfalsifiable, random hypothesis. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 08:01 -0700
csiph-web