Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.ipad > #14363 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-08-18 11:22 +0000 |
| Last post | 2012-08-21 04:44 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 236 — 27 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.ipad
does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-18 11:22 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera John Young <jy@scallawags.net> - 2012-08-18 07:36 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-08-18 12:49 +0100
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Todd Allcock <elecconnec@AnoOspamL.com> - 2012-08-18 09:04 -0600
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-08-18 16:24 +0100
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-19 12:06 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-19 06:42 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-21 04:44 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2012-08-21 06:38 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-21 08:04 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-21 08:30 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2012-08-21 09:36 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 09:39 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2012-08-21 10:14 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2012-08-21 15:05 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2012-08-21 15:21 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2012-08-21 16:04 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 16:13 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2012-08-21 19:10 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 19:29 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2012-08-21 20:43 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2012-08-21 21:07 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2012-08-22 02:14 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 23:31 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2012-08-22 02:14 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 15:24 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2012-08-21 15:51 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 16:08 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-21 18:06 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera John Young <jy@scallawags.net> - 2012-08-21 21:48 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 19:29 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2012-08-21 20:33 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-21 22:10 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2012-08-21 22:23 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 23:31 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2012-08-21 23:55 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 19:29 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2012-08-21 19:40 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-21 22:09 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 23:31 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-22 01:38 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 19:29 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-22 15:14 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-21 18:01 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2012-08-21 19:03 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-21 22:17 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2012-08-22 00:37 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2012-08-22 00:55 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-22 10:59 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Tom Stiller <tom_stiller@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-22 14:28 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2012-08-22 15:03 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-22 15:39 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2012-08-22 12:46 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-22 15:37 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2012-08-22 15:58 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2012-08-22 16:10 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-22 20:03 -0500
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2012-08-22 20:20 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 09:06 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2012-08-23 12:32 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 12:54 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2012-08-23 14:33 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 15:20 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-23 16:11 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-23 20:53 -0500
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2012-08-23 21:05 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-22 20:01 -0500
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVEsPAM}me.com> - 2012-08-22 20:44 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera salgud <spamboy6547@comcast.net> - 2012-08-23 08:12 -0600
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-24 17:10 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2012-08-24 14:20 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-08-25 08:03 +1000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-25 09:21 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-25 09:42 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-25 13:01 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-08-26 08:22 +1000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-26 11:41 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-08-27 07:38 +1000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-26 17:48 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-08-27 11:19 +1000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-27 17:13 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-08-28 08:05 +1000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-27 18:44 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-08-28 11:27 +1000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-27 20:31 -0500
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2012-08-24 21:41 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2012-08-24 22:29 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-25 09:22 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-25 09:38 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-22 01:38 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-21 22:23 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-22 15:14 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-22 08:24 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-22 11:03 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2012-08-19 23:55 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-21 05:31 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2012-08-18 09:45 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-19 12:06 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-19 08:31 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-18 07:19 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera "zulu" <zulu.romeotangohotel@ntlworld.com> - 2012-08-18 16:41 +0100
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-18 13:32 -0500
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera "zulu" <zulu.romeotangohotel@ntlworld.com> - 2012-08-18 19:45 +0100
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-18 12:07 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2012-08-18 19:54 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-18 17:07 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2012-08-18 21:54 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera "zulu" <zulu.romeotangohotel@ntlworld.com> - 2012-08-19 08:16 +0100
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-19 12:06 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-19 08:31 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-21 04:44 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-18 19:29 -0500
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2012-08-18 19:51 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera "zulu" <zulu.romeotangohotel@ntlworld.com> - 2012-08-19 08:11 +0100
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2012-08-19 20:33 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera "zulu" <zulu.romeotangohotel@ntlworld.com> - 2012-08-20 08:40 +0100
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2012-08-20 11:29 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Todd Allcock <elecconec@AnoOspamL.com> - 2012-08-20 09:43 -0600
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-20 08:55 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera "zulu" <zulu.romeotangohotel@ntlworld.com> - 2012-08-20 16:57 +0100
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-19 12:06 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera "zulu" <zulu.romeotangohotel@ntlworld.com> - 2012-08-19 15:26 +0100
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-19 08:31 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-21 04:44 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-20 23:41 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-21 13:50 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 09:37 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-19 11:45 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-21 04:52 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-20 23:41 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-21 13:50 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-19 10:53 -0500
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2012-08-19 23:49 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-19 17:40 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2012-08-20 06:42 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-20 17:14 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2012-08-20 23:04 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-21 05:32 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera sbt <dogbreath@chaseabone.com.invalid> - 2012-08-18 07:30 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-18 10:19 -0500
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2012-08-18 09:54 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-18 11:41 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-19 12:06 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-19 11:22 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera "Douglas C. Neidermeyer" <sgt@arms.omega.faber.edu> - 2012-08-18 12:12 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera claudel@sonic.net (Claude V. Lucas) - 2012-08-18 16:16 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2012-08-18 22:01 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2012-08-19 04:37 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Gerry <once@around-the-block.org> - 2012-08-18 10:03 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2012-08-18 19:42 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2012-08-18 22:04 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera "Douglas C. Neidermeyer" <sgt@arms.omega.faber.edu> - 2012-08-19 15:44 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-08-19 15:53 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera "Douglas C. Neidermeyer" <sgt@arms.omega.faber.edu> - 2012-08-19 19:34 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-21 05:32 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera "Charles" <charlesschuler@comcast.net> - 2012-08-18 18:07 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2012-08-19 04:33 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Todd Allcock <elecconnec@AnoOspamL.com> - 2012-08-19 00:55 -0600
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-19 12:06 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-19 08:31 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-21 04:44 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2012-08-19 23:31 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-19 17:40 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2012-08-20 06:23 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera "Douglas C. Neidermeyer" <sgt@arms.omega.faber.edu> - 2012-08-20 08:38 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera MrTallyman <MrTallyman@BananaCountersRUs.org> - 2012-08-20 06:29 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-20 07:32 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-20 08:55 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-20 09:21 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-20 10:19 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-20 11:52 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Todd Allcock <elecconnec@AnoOspamL.com> - 2012-08-20 12:03 -0600
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera "Douglas C. Neidermeyer" <sgt@arms.omega.faber.edu> - 2012-08-20 12:27 -0400
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-20 10:13 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Todd Allcock <elecconnec@AnoOspamL.com> - 2012-08-20 09:24 -0600
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2012-08-20 19:25 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2012-08-20 19:20 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-20 08:55 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-20 09:31 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-20 10:19 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-20 12:02 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-20 12:23 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-20 13:25 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-20 15:12 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-20 18:23 -0500
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-20 19:24 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-20 21:47 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-20 21:42 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-20 23:41 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-21 13:50 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 09:37 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-22 01:38 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 19:29 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-21 07:23 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 09:37 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-22 01:38 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 19:29 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-21 22:33 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-21 22:31 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-21 06:28 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 00:06 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-21 13:22 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 09:37 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera "zulu" <zulu.romeotangohotel@ntlworld.com> - 2012-08-21 20:50 +0100
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 12:59 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera "zulu" <zulu.romeotangohotel@ntlworld.com> - 2012-08-21 22:46 +0100
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-22 01:38 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-21 22:34 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-22 15:14 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-22 08:24 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2012-08-20 22:59 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-20 16:36 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-20 21:26 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2012-08-21 06:31 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 00:06 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-21 07:29 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 09:37 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-22 01:38 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 19:29 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-21 07:25 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 09:37 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-22 01:38 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2012-08-20 19:28 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-21 06:10 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-21 05:32 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-19 12:06 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-08-19 06:48 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-21 04:44 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-19 08:31 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2012-08-19 23:46 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-19 17:40 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2012-08-20 06:35 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-20 08:55 -0700
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Todd Allcock <elecconnec@AnoOspamL.com> - 2012-08-19 22:01 -0600
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-21 05:32 +0000
Re: does anyone use their iPad as a camera Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> - 2012-08-21 04:44 +0000
Page 2 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 12 Next page →
| From | Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 20:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <k11khb$ssg$1@reader1.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #14698 |
On 2012-08-22 02:29:01 +0000, nospam said:
> In article <2012082119103550073-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
> Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>
>>> if he bought the d70 kit, he probably has the 18-70mm, but he might
>>> have the older non-stabilized 18-55mm.
>>
>> The original 18-70mm kit lens was a surprisingly good over performer.
>
> yes it was.
I'm going from memory, but I'm pretty certain that the lens they have
is *not* stabilized (ie. no VR). It's still been a great camera, up
until when it stopped working and they got a quote of $200+ to fix it -
if they even can. $700 for a D3200 - including a longer ranged VR lens -
starts looking pretty good. They got like 7 years out of the camera,
and while not used daily, it was dragged all over the place with the kids.
Come to think of it, they may have two lenses. I'm not sure. All the
old lens that work on the D-70 should work on a D3200, right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 21:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2012082121073527544-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #14708 |
On 2012-08-21 20:43:39 -0700, Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> said:
> On 2012-08-22 02:29:01 +0000, nospam said:
>
>> In article <2012082119103550073-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
>> Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> if he bought the d70 kit, he probably has the 18-70mm, but he might
>>>> have the older non-stabilized 18-55mm.
>>>
>>> The original 18-70mm kit lens was a surprisingly good over performer.
>>
>> yes it was.
>
> I'm going from memory, but I'm pretty certain that the lens they have
> is *not* stabilized (ie. no VR). It's still been a great camera, up
> until when it stopped working and they got a quote of $200+ to fix it -
> if they even can. $700 for a D3200 - including a longer ranged VR lens -
> starts looking pretty good. They got like 7 years out of the camera,
> and while not used daily, it was dragged all over the place with the kids.
>
> Come to think of it, they may have two lenses. I'm not sure. All the
> old lens that work on the D-70 should work on a D3200, right?
...er, possibly, if they have the 18-70mm non-VR it will work just
fine. If they have any lenses requiring an in camera focus motor they
will not work as most would wish with the D3200, but they can always go
to the Nikon side to check on lens compatibility and you will find this
for the D3200.
"AF NIKKOR for F3AF not Supported
AF-S, AF-I: All Functions Supported
AI-P NIKKOR: All Functions Supported Except Autofocus and 3D Color
Matrix Metering II
Electronic Rangefinder can be used if Maximum Aperture is f/5.6 or Faster
IX NIKKOR Lenses Cannot be Used
Non-CPU: Autofocus not supported. Can be used in mode M, but exposure
meter does not function.
Other AF NIKKOR: All Functions Supported Except autofocus and 3D Color
Matrix Metering II
Type G or D AF NIKKOR: All Functions Supported Except Autofocus
Type D PC NIKKOR: All Functions Supported Except Autofocus and some
Shooting Modes"
--
Regards,
Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-22 02:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <k127ua$opi$2@reader1.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #14709 |
On 2012-08-22 04:07:35 +0000, Savageduck said: > On 2012-08-21 20:43:39 -0700, Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> said: >> Come to think of it, they may have two lenses. I'm not sure. All the >> old lens that work on the D-70 should work on a D3200, right? > > ...er, possibly, if they have the 18-70mm non-VR it will work just > fine. If they have any lenses requiring an in camera focus motor they > will not work as most would wish with the D3200, but they can always go > to the Nikon side to check on lens compatibility and you will find this > for the D3200. Very cool. Thanks!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 23:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <210820122331164733%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #14708 |
In article <k11khb$ssg$1@reader1.panix.com>, Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> wrote: > Come to think of it, they may have two lenses. I'm not sure. All the > old lens that work on the D-70 should work on a D3200, right? that depends what you mean by 'work'. just about every nikon lens from the late 1970s will mount and work, but some lenses may not autofocus. if the lens has an internal focus motor (af-s in nikon lens lingo), then it will autofocus on a d3200. most nikon lenses made in the last decade or so have an internal motor, including the 18-70mm, which was the d70 kit lens. if the lens does not have an internal focus motor, the lens will mount and function properly (the meter will work, aperture will stop down, etc.), however, it will not autofocus because the d3200 and other low end nikon slrs do not have an internal focus motor to drive the lens. you will have to manually focus it, however, autofocus system is still enabled and you will get focus confirmation, so it's not *too* bad.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-22 02:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <k127t8$opi$1@reader1.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #14719 |
On 2012-08-22 06:31:16 +0000, nospam said: > In article <k11khb$ssg$1@reader1.panix.com>, Bread > <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> wrote: > >> Come to think of it, they may have two lenses. I'm not sure. All the >> old lens that work on the D-70 should work on a D3200, right? > > that depends what you mean by 'work'. > > just about every nikon lens from the late 1970s will mount and work, > but some lenses may not autofocus. Very cool. Thanks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 15:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <210820121524443214%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #14665 |
In article <k110mp$7j9$1@reader1.panix.com>, Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> wrote: > A friend, however, has a d-70 (maybe it's a d-80? I forget) which has > now died and is interested in replacing it. A few years ago, when we > got our d-90, I'd have recommended the same. But it's been 4 years and > that's a _long_ time in digital photography. > > Any strong recommendations? how much does he want to spend and how many (and which) lenses does he have? assuming he wants to stay with nikon, there is the new nikon d3200 with 24 mp (about $700, red or black), as well as the previous d3100 (about $500 with rebate that expires this week) and the d5100 (about $650 w/rebate, also expiring). the d7000 is very nice ($1200), as is the d300s ($1700), but both are due for a replacement very soon, maybe even this week given that the rebates are expiring. the android coolpix is expected to be announced but maybe there will be more.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 15:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <k113e7$dpc$1@reader1.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #14667 |
On 2012-08-21 22:24:44 +0000, nospam said: > In article <k110mp$7j9$1@reader1.panix.com>, Bread > <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> wrote: > >> A friend, however, has a d-70 (maybe it's a d-80? I forget) which has >> now died and is interested in replacing it. A few years ago, when we >> got our d-90, I'd have recommended the same. But it's been 4 years and >> that's a _long_ time in digital photography. >> >> Any strong recommendations? > > how much does he want to spend and how many (and which) lenses does he > have? > > assuming he wants to stay with nikon, there is the new nikon d3200 with > 24 mp (about $700, red or black), as well as the previous d3100 (about > $500 with rebate that expires this week) and the d5100 (about $650 > w/rebate, also expiring). I suspect that they'd be into the 5-700 price range, inasmuch as I don't think they would care about the marginal difference an extra $1000 would make above that. As I understand it, the current crop in that $700 or so range is pretty amazing - certainly lots better than their old D70. Does anyone really need 24 megapixels? Is that what we're up to now? I thought the quality-vs-quantity thing was settled and now we were more focused on quality. How big those files must be. I'll suggest they take a look at the D3200. Just looked at it on dpreview and it looks like a pretty smart replacement for their old D70. Thanks! Very helpful. Hopefully, I'll get a few more years out of my D-90. I've really been enjoying it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 16:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <210820121608592500%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #14670 |
In article <k113e7$dpc$1@reader1.panix.com>, Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> wrote: > >> A friend, however, has a d-70 (maybe it's a d-80? I forget) which has > >> now died and is interested in replacing it. A few years ago, when we > >> got our d-90, I'd have recommended the same. But it's been 4 years and > >> that's a _long_ time in digital photography. > >> > >> Any strong recommendations? > > > > how much does he want to spend and how many (and which) lenses does he > > have? > > > > assuming he wants to stay with nikon, there is the new nikon d3200 with > > 24 mp (about $700, red or black), as well as the previous d3100 (about > > $500 with rebate that expires this week) and the d5100 (about $650 > > w/rebate, also expiring). > > I suspect that they'd be into the 5-700 price range, inasmuch as I > don't think they would care about the marginal difference an extra > $1000 would make above that. As I understand it, the current crop in > that $700 or so range is pretty amazing - certainly lots better than > their old D70. they're quite a bit better than the d70, especially dynamic range & high iso. > Does anyone really need 24 megapixels? Is that what we're up to now? > I thought the quality-vs-quantity thing was settled and now we were > more focused on quality. How big those files must be. I'll suggest > they take a look at the D3200. Just looked at it on dpreview and it > looks like a pretty smart replacement for their old D70. most people don't need 24 mp, but it does let you crop and still have a usable image, which is cheaper than buying a longer lens. but if that's not enough, there is the d800 with 36 mp. > Thanks! Very helpful. Hopefully, I'll get a few more years out of my > D-90. I've really been enjoying it. an excellent camera, and a used one could be an option for him too. another thing to keep in mind is which lenses he has, because if any of them need a focus motor in the camera, his choices are limited to the d90, d7000 and d300s (or replace the lenses). most lenses don't so that may not be an issue, but if he wants to use older lenses, then it might be.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 18:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <michelle-228CFA.18060221082012@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #14657 |
In article <210820120939471389%nospam@nospam.invalid>, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > > As always this is one of those times you should discount the megapixel > > race, the D70 is a very capable camera at 6.3MP. > > it is, but it's also an old camera. modern slrs are quite a bit better > than the d70. The D70s is about seven years old; we can't all keep buying new cameras every time a new model is released. but even though it is old, it is still generates superior quality pictures compared to the iOS devices. -- Tea Party Patriots is to Patriotism as People's Democratic Republic is to Democracy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Young <jy@scallawags.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 21:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jy-3518BA.21485921082012@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #14680 |
In article <michelle-228CFA.18060221082012@news.eternal-september.org>, Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: > but even though it is old, it is still generates superior quality pictures > compared to the iOS devices. My 4s with the right camera app can outdo the D70 in most situations. For some people the iPad3 is far superior.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 19:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <210820121929113243%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #14695 |
In article <jy-3518BA.21485921082012@news.eternal-september.org>, John Young <jy@scallawags.net> wrote: > My 4s with the right camera app can outdo the D70 in most situations. that's unlikely. something might be wrong with your d70.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 20:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2012082120330211272-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #14695 |
On 2012-08-21 18:48:59 -0700, John Young <jy@scallawags.net> said: > In article <michelle-228CFA.18060221082012@news.eternal-september.org>, > Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: > >> but even though it is old, it is still generates superior quality pictures >> compared to the iOS devices. > > My 4s with the right camera app can outdo the D70 in most situations. > For some people the iPad3 is far superior. In your dreams! It seems you are a rabid advocate iOS photography and lack of understanding regarding the physical limitations of the 4S camera. I own and use a 4S with several apps, and none of those combinations can match the performance of my other cameras, a Canon G11, a Nikon D300s, and yes, a Nikon D70. I get reasonably acceptable images from my 4S, but what I get from my D300s, my G11, and my D70 are far superior to the 4s product. Ultimately in photography, size matters, and I am not referring to the consumer megapixel race. So I will stick to my DSLR for anything I consider worth working on, and i will reserve my iphone 4S for those times i don't have anything more capable handy. For you to contemplate: A 4S shot, not bad, but pretty much a snapshot and cleaned up in Photoshop. < http://db.tt/jzZlmAo7 > Two G11 shots. < http://db.tt/kNbjk2A0 > < http://db.tt/wyKW5yB2 > Two D300S shots: < http://db.tt/w0bdoUro > < http://db.tt/XvdIPNwE > ...and a D70 shot: < http://db.tt/pjNfsqGg > -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 22:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <michelle-4464B1.22101121082012@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #14695 |
In article <jy-3518BA.21485921082012@news.eternal-september.org>, John Young <jy@scallawags.net> wrote: > > but even though it is old, it is still generates superior quality > > pictures compared to the iOS devices. > > My 4s with the right camera app can outdo the D70 in most situations. Outdo in what respects? BTW, it's a D70s, a slight upgrade from the D70. -- Tea Party Patriots is to Patriotism as People's Democratic Republic is to Democracy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 22:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2012082122234350878-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #14712 |
On 2012-08-21 22:10:11 -0700, Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> said: > In article <jy-3518BA.21485921082012@news.eternal-september.org>, > John Young <jy@scallawags.net> wrote: > >>> but even though it is old, it is still generates superior quality >>> pictures compared to the iOS devices. >> >> My 4s with the right camera app can outdo the D70 in most situations. > > Outdo in what respects? BTW, it's a D70s, a slight upgrade from the D70. The major upgrade was a slight change to the LCD and most importantly a firmware upgrade which was easily applied to the D70 making the only difference the LCD. There is no functional difference between a D70 with the firmware upgrade and a D70S. ...and a D70, or a D70S has got mobile device cameras, iOS, or Android beat in all but pocketable convenience. -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 23:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <210820122331194917%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #14715 |
In article <2012082122234350878-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> > Outdo in what respects? BTW, it's a D70s, a slight upgrade from the D70.
>
> The major upgrade was a slight change to the LCD and most importantly a
> firmware upgrade which was easily applied to the D70 making the only
> difference the LCD.
the firmware added everything that the d70s had that wasn't a physical
change, which was the lcd as you mentioned, plus a wired remote jack
that most people probably didn't use.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 23:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2012082123550984492-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #14721 |
On 2012-08-21 23:31:19 -0700, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> said:
> In article <2012082122234350878-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
> Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>
>>> Outdo in what respects? BTW, it's a D70s, a slight upgrade from the D70.
>>
>> The major upgrade was a slight change to the LCD and most importantly a
>> firmware upgrade which was easily applied to the D70 making the only
>> difference the LCD.
>
> the firmware added everything that the d70s had that wasn't a physical
> change, which was the lcd as you mentioned, plus a wired remote jack
> that most people probably didn't use.
Yup!
My D70 uses the small IR remote.
--
Regards,
Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 19:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <210820121929042809%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #14680 |
In article <michelle-228CFA.18060221082012@news.eternal-september.org>, Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: > > > As always this is one of those times you should discount the megapixel > > > race, the D70 is a very capable camera at 6.3MP. > > > > it is, but it's also an old camera. modern slrs are quite a bit better > > than the d70. > > The D70s is about seven years old; we can't all keep buying new cameras > every time a new model is released. who said you had to buy a new camera every time a new one is released? how often do you buy apple products? are you still using the same mac you had in 2005? there wasn't an iphone then, but i seem to recall you've had at least two iphones. > but even though it is old, it is still generates superior quality pictures > compared to the iOS devices. my point was that if a 7 year old slr can do better than an ios device, then a current dslr (or even a modern p&s) will be *much* better.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 19:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2012082119403943658-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #14699 |
On 2012-08-21 19:29:04 -0700, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> said: > In article <michelle-228CFA.18060221082012@news.eternal-september.org>, > Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: > >>>> As always this is one of those times you should discount the megapixel >>>> race, the D70 is a very capable camera at 6.3MP. >>> >>> it is, but it's also an old camera. modern slrs are quite a bit better >>> than the d70. >> >> The D70s is about seven years old; we can't all keep buying new cameras >> every time a new model is released. > > who said you had to buy a new camera every time a new one is released? > > how often do you buy apple products? > > are you still using the same mac you had in 2005? there wasn't an > iphone then, but i seem to recall you've had at least two iphones. > >> but even though it is old, it is still generates superior quality pictures >> compared to the iOS devices. > > my point was that if a 7 year old slr can do better than an ios device, > then a current dslr (or even a modern p&s) will be *much* better. Agreed. There is no getting away from the handicap of physical sensor size found in the camera of any mobile device, iOS or Android. ...and no App is going to compensate for that. -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 22:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <michelle-BBD7A0.22091221082012@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #14699 |
In article <210820121929042809%nospam@nospam.invalid>, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > > > > As always this is one of those times you should discount the > > > > megapixel race, the D70 is a very capable camera at 6.3MP. > > > > > > it is, but it's also an old camera. modern slrs are quite a bit > > > better than the d70. > > > > The D70s is about seven years old; we can't all keep buying new > > cameras every time a new model is released. > > who said you had to buy a new camera every time a new one is released? then why bother to say that it's an old camera? > are you still using the same mac you had in 2005? Nope. I am using the same Mac I had in July 2007, though. -- Tea Party Patriots is to Patriotism as People's Democratic Republic is to Democracy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-21 23:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <210820122331184836%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #14711 |
In article <michelle-BBD7A0.22091221082012@news.eternal-september.org>, Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: > > > > > As always this is one of those times you should discount the > > > > > megapixel race, the D70 is a very capable camera at 6.3MP. > > > > > > > > it is, but it's also an old camera. modern slrs are quite a bit > > > > better than the d70. > > > > > > The D70s is about seven years old; we can't all keep buying new > > > cameras every time a new model is released. > > > > who said you had to buy a new camera every time a new one is released? > > then why bother to say that it's an old camera? because if a camera from 7 years ago beats an iphone, then one from this year will blow well past it because today's cameras are quite a bit better than cameras from 7 years ago.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.ipad
csiph-web