Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.mobile.ipad > #36180 > unrolled thread

Chicken Little

Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.ipad

Contents

  Chicken Little Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-06-02 12:12 -0700
    Re: Chicken Little Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-02 19:21 +0000
      Re: Chicken Little android <here@there.was> - 2014-06-03 08:42 +0200
    Re: Chicken Little jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2014-06-03 08:14 +1200
      Re: Chicken Little Fred Moore <fmoore@gcfn.org> - 2014-06-02 17:03 -0400
      Re: Chicken Little Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-03 09:11 +1200
        Re: Chicken Little jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2014-06-03 09:54 +1200
          Re: Chicken Little Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-03 18:39 +1200
            Re: Chicken Little jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2014-06-03 22:09 +1200
    Re: Chicken Little erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-06-02 16:56 -0500
    Re: Chicken Little Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2014-06-02 19:07 -0700
      Re: Chicken Little Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-06-02 19:35 -0700
        Re: Chicken Little Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-06-02 20:54 -0700
    Re: Chicken Little android <here@there.was> - 2014-06-03 08:41 +0200
    Re: Chicken Little Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@gmail.com> - 2014-06-06 06:24 +0200
      Re: Chicken Little Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-06-05 22:12 -0700
        Re: Chicken Little FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2014-06-06 04:07 -0400
          Re: Chicken Little Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-06 13:49 +0000
          Re: Chicken Little Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-06-06 08:28 -0700
        Re: Chicken Little FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2014-06-06 04:11 -0400
          Re: Chicken Little Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-06 13:52 +0000
            Re: Chicken Little nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-06-06 11:32 -0400
              Re: Chicken Little George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2014-06-06 15:44 -0500
              Re: Chicken Little George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2014-06-06 15:47 -0500
        Re: Chicken Little Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-06-06 10:23 +0100
          Re: Chicken Little Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-06 13:53 +0000
            Re: Chicken Little George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2014-06-06 15:42 -0500
              Re: Chicken Little Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@gmail.com> - 2014-06-07 13:15 +0200
                Re: Chicken Little Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-07 14:31 +0000
                  Re: Chicken Little JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-06-07 13:29 -0400
                Re: Chicken Little George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2014-06-07 16:10 -0500
            Re: Chicken Little Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@gmail.com> - 2014-06-07 13:15 +0200
              Re: Chicken Little Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-06-07 14:20 +0000
              Re: Chicken Little "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-06-08 11:46 +1000
                Re: Chicken Little JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-06-08 14:13 -0400
                  Re: Chicken Little "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-06-09 07:26 +1000
                    Re: Chicken Little George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2014-06-08 20:47 -0500
                      Re: Chicken Little "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-06-09 14:53 +1000
                        Re: Chicken Little JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-06-09 13:12 -0400
                          Re: Chicken Little George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2014-06-09 13:04 -0500
                            Re: Chicken Little Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-06-10 09:34 +1200
                          Re: Chicken Little "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-06-10 06:43 +1000
                  Re: Chicken Little George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2014-06-08 20:45 -0500
        Re: Chicken Little Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-06-06 08:03 -0500
        Re: Chicken Little Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@gmail.com> - 2014-06-07 13:12 +0200

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#36180 — Chicken Little

Chicken Little is screaming that Apple is doomed because it didn't
introduce any new hardware at the WWDC keynote this morning.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#36181

On 2014-06-02, Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
> Chicken Little is screaming that Apple is doomed because it didn't
> introduce any new hardware at the WWDC keynote this morning.

Best to ignore all the crack-pot idiots for the next few days.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36270

In article <bv416eF5iniU1@mid.individual.net>,
 Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

> On 2014-06-02, Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
> > Chicken Little is screaming that Apple is doomed because it didn't
> > introduce any new hardware at the WWDC keynote this morning.
> 
> Best to ignore all the crack-pot idiots for the next few days.

to plonk or not to plonk... ;-p
-- 
teleportation kills
http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36187

Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:

> Chicken Little is screaming that Apple is doomed because it didn't
> introduce any new hardware at the WWDC keynote this morning.

Well I heard Apple is doomed because they're in the acquisition business
again (Beats), and thus apparently fresh out of internal creativity.
Doomed they say! DOOOOOOMMMED!
-- 
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36192

On 6/2/14, 4:14 p, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote:
> Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
>
>> Chicken Little is screaming that Apple is doomed because it didn't
>> introduce any new hardware at the WWDC keynote this morning.
>
> Well I heard Apple is doomed because they're in the acquisition business
> again (Beats), and thus apparently fresh out of internal creativity.
> Doomed they say! DOOOOOOMMMED!

Apple? Apple who?   Applejack? Big Apple? Crabapple?

Oh, you must mean that tiny startup Apple Computer! Nah, some Windows 
guys, and they should know, told me Apple went out of business in 1983.

-- 
I certainly feel like the product of quantum fluctuations on many days 
of the week, don't you?   --Stephen Hawking

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36195

In article <1lmno3v.1f504e31ryhih7N%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz>, Jamie
Kahn Genet <jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> wrote:

> Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
> 
> > Chicken Little is screaming that Apple is doomed because it didn't
> > introduce any new hardware at the WWDC keynote this morning.
> 
> Well I heard Apple is doomed because they're in the acquisition business
> again (Beats), and thus apparently fresh out of internal creativity.
> Doomed they say! DOOOOOOMMMED!

I think you misheard them talking about Apple's new campus design,
which is domed they say! DOMMMMED!  ;-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36198

Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

> In article <1lmno3v.1f504e31ryhih7N%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz>, Jamie
> Kahn Genet <jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> wrote:
> 
> > Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Chicken Little is screaming that Apple is doomed because it didn't
> > > introduce any new hardware at the WWDC keynote this morning.
> > 
> > Well I heard Apple is doomed because they're in the acquisition business
> > again (Beats), and thus apparently fresh out of internal creativity.
> > Doomed they say! DOOOOOOMMMED!
> 
> I think you misheard them talking about Apple's new campus design,
> which is domed they say! DOMMMMED!  ;-)

Domed AND doomed I hear! Because don't ya know when companies start
building expensive and innovative HQs they're inevitably about to fail
big time?
-- 
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36268

In article <1lmnssb.8391mb3vkagN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz>, Jamie
Kahn Genet <jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> wrote:

> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
> 
> > In article <1lmno3v.1f504e31ryhih7N%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz>, Jamie
> > Kahn Genet <jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> wrote:
> > 
> > > Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Chicken Little is screaming that Apple is doomed because it didn't
> > > > introduce any new hardware at the WWDC keynote this morning.
> > > 
> > > Well I heard Apple is doomed because they're in the acquisition business
> > > again (Beats), and thus apparently fresh out of internal creativity.
> > > Doomed they say! DOOOOOOMMMED!
> > 
> > I think you misheard them talking about Apple's new campus design,
> > which is domed they say! DOMMMMED!  ;-)
> 
> Domed AND doomed I hear! Because don't ya know when companies start
> building expensive and innovative HQs they're inevitably about to fail
> big time?

You misheard. Apple buying Beats with their over-powerful base, what
was really said was "Apple is boomed they say, BOOOOMMMED!"  ;-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36271

Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

> In article <1lmnssb.8391mb3vkagN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz>, Jamie
> Kahn Genet <jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> wrote:
> 
> > Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > In article <1lmno3v.1f504e31ryhih7N%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz>, Jamie
> > > Kahn Genet <jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Chicken Little is screaming that Apple is doomed because it didn't
> > > > > introduce any new hardware at the WWDC keynote this morning.
> > > > 
> > > > Well I heard Apple is doomed because they're in the acquisition business
> > > > again (Beats), and thus apparently fresh out of internal creativity.
> > > > Doomed they say! DOOOOOOMMMED!
> > > 
> > > I think you misheard them talking about Apple's new campus design,
> > > which is domed they say! DOMMMMED!  ;-)
> > 
> > Domed AND doomed I hear! Because don't ya know when companies start
> > building expensive and innovative HQs they're inevitably about to fail
> > big time?
> 
> You misheard. Apple buying Beats with their over-powerful base, what
> was really said was "Apple is boomed they say, BOOOOMMMED!"  ;-)

LOL. Thanks for the chuckle - that really tickled me :-)
-- 
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36199

In article <020620141212394785%michelle@michelle.org>,
 Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:

> Chicken Little is screaming that Apple is doomed because it didn't
> introduce any new hardware at the WWDC keynote this morning.

giggles 8-)

-- 
Erilar, biblioholic medievalist

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36245

In article <020620141212394785%michelle@michelle.org>,
 Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:

> Chicken Little is screaming that Apple is doomed because it didn't
> introduce any new hardware at the WWDC keynote this morning.

Chicken Little?

That's what I had for dinner.

The loudest, most unproductive chicken ends up being Sunday dinner...

-- 
DeeDee, don't press that button!  DeeDee!  NO!  Dee...
[I filter all Goggle Groups posts, so any reply may be automatically ignored]

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36246

In article <vilain-0626B2.19075502062014@news.individual.net>, Michael
Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> wrote:

> In article <020620141212394785%michelle@michelle.org>,
>  Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
> 
> > Chicken Little is screaming that Apple is doomed because it didn't
> > introduce any new hardware at the WWDC keynote this morning.
> 
> Chicken Little?
> 
> That's what I had for dinner.
> 
> The loudest, most unproductive chicken ends up being Sunday dinner...

But today is Monday.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36257

On 2014-06-03 02:35:15 +0000, Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> said:

> In article <vilain-0626B2.19075502062014@news.individual.net>, Michael
> Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> wrote:
> 
>> In article <020620141212394785%michelle@michelle.org>,
>> Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> Chicken Little is screaming that Apple is doomed because it didn't
>>> introduce any new hardware at the WWDC keynote this morning.
>> 
>> Chicken Little?
>> 
>> That's what I had for dinner.
>> 
>> The loudest, most unproductive chicken ends up being Sunday dinner...
> 
> But today is Monday.

Left overs.

-- 
Regards,

Savageduck

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36269

In article <020620141212394785%michelle@michelle.org>,
 Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:

> Chicken Little is screaming that Apple is doomed because it didn't
> introduce any new hardware at the WWDC keynote this morning.

The apple will fall in the autumn... ;-p
-- 
teleportation kills
http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36373

Michelle Steiner writes:

> Chicken Little is screaming that Apple is doomed because it didn't
> introduce any new hardware at the WWDC keynote this morning.

I'm sure geeks may feel that way, but Apple is in the mainstream now, and
mainstream, ordinary users don't need to see new hardware every six months. Or
even new software, for that matter.

I just wish the IT industry were as stable as many other industries. It's fun
when you work with computers for the sake of working with computers, but not
when you use computers purely as tools, and you still have a life outside the
computer world.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36378

In article <6ig2p9ht5l290li6p0qh98t8na4slhp01k@4ax.com>, Mxsmanic
<mxsmanic@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Chicken Little is screaming that Apple is doomed because it didn't
> > introduce any new hardware at the WWDC keynote this morning.
> 
> I'm sure geeks may feel that way, but Apple is in the mainstream now, and
> mainstream, ordinary users don't need to see new hardware every six months. Or
> even new software, for that matter.

That screaming is from "Wall Street analysts" and tech writers for
magazines, newspapers, and web sites.  Geeks and ordinary users don't
care all that much.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36392

In article <050620142212226272%michelle@michelle.org>,
 Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:

> In article <6ig2p9ht5l290li6p0qh98t8na4slhp01k@4ax.com>, Mxsmanic
> <mxsmanic@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Chicken Little is screaming that Apple is doomed because it didn't
> > > introduce any new hardware at the WWDC keynote this morning.
> > 
> > I'm sure geeks may feel that way, but Apple is in the mainstream now, and
> > mainstream, ordinary users don't need to see new hardware every six months. 
> > Or
> > even new software, for that matter.
> 
> That screaming is from "Wall Street analysts" and tech writers for
> magazines, newspapers, and web sites.  Geeks and ordinary users don't
> care all that much.

Can we go back to calling Apple "beleaguered" again?

I really miss reading that!

-- 
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience. -Twain

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36402

On 2014-06-06, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Can we go back to calling Apple "beleaguered" again?
>
> I really miss reading that!

+1

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36412

In article <fredp151-774709.04074306062014@news.eternal-september.org>,
FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:

> Can we go back to calling Apple "beleaguered" again?
> 
> I really miss reading that!

*laugh*

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36394

In article <050620142212226272%michelle@michelle.org>,
 Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:

> In article <6ig2p9ht5l290li6p0qh98t8na4slhp01k@4ax.com>, Mxsmanic
> <mxsmanic@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Chicken Little is screaming that Apple is doomed because it didn't
> > > introduce any new hardware at the WWDC keynote this morning.
> > 
> > I'm sure geeks may feel that way, but Apple is in the mainstream now, and
> > mainstream, ordinary users don't need to see new hardware every six months. 
> > Or
> > even new software, for that matter.
> 
> That screaming is from "Wall Street analysts" and tech writers for
> magazines, newspapers, and web sites.  Geeks and ordinary users don't
> care all that much.

Even better...  I found the "Apple Death Knell" counter... an oldie, but 
a goodie.

http://www.macobserver.com/article/2002/10/29.5.shtml

"It happens every few weeks: Someone new jumps on the bandwagon loudly 
proclaiming that Apple will soon be dead. It's been happening since the 
early 1980s, and still Apple, and its doom sayers, keep chugging along. 
We decided that it would be interesting to collect these stories, 
prognostications, predictions, and premature eulogies in a sort of 
testimonial of buffoonery, and we are calling it The Apple Death Knell 
Counter.
We shall keep a running total of the number of times that Apple has been 
declared dead or dying, with links to each one (whenever possible), the 
date it was published, and the person who so blithely set upon the path 
of being utterly wrong. With luck, we'll eventually get back to the 
primordial Death Knell, whose peals have rung on long past their normal 
life spans."

-- 
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience. -Twain

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.ipad

csiph-web