Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.ipad > #46299 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Bert <bert@iphouse.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-03-11 18:50 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-03-12 10:28 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 98 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.ipad
Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-03-11 18:50 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-11 14:54 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-11 18:58 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-11 15:01 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-03-11 22:44 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-11 23:06 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-03-12 18:15 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-11 19:32 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2015-03-11 12:39 -0700
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-11 19:47 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-11 19:57 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Adair Bordon <Adair@not_my_real_email.com> - 2015-03-11 22:29 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2015-03-13 13:47 -0700
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-11 20:50 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-03-11 22:45 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-11 23:05 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-03-12 18:18 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-12 18:45 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-12 19:41 -0500
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-03-13 16:27 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-13 13:10 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-03-13 17:12 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-13 17:17 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-03-13 17:25 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-13 18:02 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-03-13 18:44 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-13 19:03 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-03-13 19:46 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-13 16:45 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-13 21:24 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-13 14:06 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-03-13 18:41 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release bj <address_is@invalid.invalid> - 2015-03-13 13:43 -0500
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-13 19:05 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-03-13 19:46 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-13 16:45 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-13 21:11 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-13 21:55 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-13 16:45 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2015-03-13 13:50 -0700
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-13 17:03 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release bj <address_is@invalid.invalid> - 2015-03-14 12:54 -0500
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-14 14:04 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release bj <address_is@invalid.invalid> - 2015-03-14 15:06 -0500
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-14 16:08 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release bj <address_is@invalid.invalid> - 2015-03-14 16:30 -0500
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-14 21:41 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-13 17:47 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-03-13 18:43 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-12 01:59 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-03-12 18:17 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-12 18:47 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-03-12 20:20 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-12 16:26 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Peter Crosland <g6jns@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-03-12 19:13 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-03-12 20:20 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Peter Crosland <g6jns@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-03-12 21:22 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-03-13 16:24 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Peter Crosland <g6jns@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-03-13 22:39 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-12 15:53 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-12 21:35 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-03-13 16:26 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-13 13:09 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-12 00:02 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-03-12 07:34 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-12 12:56 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-03-12 14:50 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-12 15:01 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-03-12 15:19 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-12 11:28 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-12 15:35 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-03-12 19:20 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-12 15:53 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release bj <address_is@invalid.invalid> - 2015-03-12 20:12 -0500
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-12 11:11 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-12 21:33 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-03-13 09:05 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Peter Crosland <g6jns@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-03-13 11:15 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-03-14 09:01 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Peter Crosland <g6jns@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-03-14 12:12 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-03-14 14:06 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-14 13:01 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-14 19:54 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Peter Crosland <g6jns@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-03-14 17:18 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-14 13:42 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-03-14 18:52 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-14 15:41 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Peter Crosland <g6jns@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-03-14 20:26 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-14 16:28 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Peter Crosland <g6jns@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-03-14 20:49 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-14 16:58 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-03-15 10:24 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-15 09:07 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Peter Crosland <g6jns@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-03-15 18:38 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-14 21:39 +0000
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-14 08:21 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-13 12:20 -0400
Re: Apple fixes major oversight with iOS 8.2 release nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-12 10:28 -0400
Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 Next page →
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 13:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <130320151310086495%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #46405 |
In article <XnsA45C74B403D0DVeebleFetzer@127.0.0.1>, Bert <bert@iphouse.com> wrote: > >>> Why turn it off? > >> > >> Why turn it on if I'm not using it? > > > > Because you are a "worry-wart"?!? > > And what kind of wart are you, who is so, so very concnerned about how I > use Bluetooth on my iPad? so turn it off. nobody cares. however, be aware you are losing functionality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bert <bert@iphouse.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 17:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA45C7C4F7E4D4VeebleFetzer@127.0.0.1> |
| In reply to | #46408 |
In news:130320151310086495%nospam@nospam.invalid nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > so turn it off. nobody cares. That's funny. Care to explain the content of this thread, and your participation in it? -- bert@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 17:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cmgke2FmctlU10@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #46409 |
On 2015-03-13, Bert <bert@iphouse.com> wrote: > In news:130320151310086495%nospam@nospam.invalid nospam ><nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> so turn it off. nobody cares. > > That's funny. > > Care to explain the content of this thread, and your participation in > it? That's easy: It's one thing to turn off Bluetooth, but it's another to claim the *reason* for doing so is nebulous security or power saving reasons without any evidence whatsoever to back up those assertions. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bert <bert@iphouse.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 17:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA45C7E98CDB97VeebleFetzer@127.0.0.1> |
| In reply to | #46410 |
In news:cmgke2FmctlU10@mid.individual.net Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > On 2015-03-13, Bert <bert@iphouse.com> wrote: >> In news:130320151310086495%nospam@nospam.invalid nospam >><nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >>> so turn it off. nobody cares. >> >> That's funny. >> >> Care to explain the content of this thread, and your participation in >> it? > > That's easy: Remember: "nobody cares." > It's one thing to turn off Bluetooth, but it's another to > claim the *reason* for doing so is nebulous security or power saving > reasons without any evidence whatsoever to back up those assertions. So, where, exactly did I make any claims about security or power saving, or anything at all beyond that I turned it off? You guys are hallucinating. And that's funny too. -- bert@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 18:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cmgn25FmctlU11@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #46411 |
On 2015-03-13, Bert <bert@iphouse.com> wrote: > In news:cmgke2FmctlU10@mid.individual.net Jolly Roger ><jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > >> On 2015-03-13, Bert <bert@iphouse.com> wrote: >>> In news:130320151310086495%nospam@nospam.invalid nospam >>><nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> so turn it off. nobody cares. >>> >>> That's funny. >>> >>> Care to explain the content of this thread, and your participation in >>> it? >> >> That's easy: > > Remember: "nobody cares." Nobody cares whether you enable Bluetooth. People do care if you spread misinformation about why you do it though. It's a simple distinction. >> It's one thing to turn off Bluetooth, but it's another to >> claim the *reason* for doing so is nebulous security or power saving >> reasons without any evidence whatsoever to back up those assertions. > > So, where, exactly did I make any claims about security or power saving, > or anything at all beyond that I turned it off? You may not have but others certainly did - hence this thread. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bert <bert@iphouse.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 18:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA45C8BEBE4AC5VeebleFetzer@127.0.0.1> |
| In reply to | #46415 |
In news:cmgn25FmctlU11@mid.individual.net Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > On 2015-03-13, Bert <bert@iphouse.com> wrote: >> In news:cmgke2FmctlU10@mid.individual.net Jolly Roger >><jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-03-13, Bert <bert@iphouse.com> wrote: >>>> In news:130320151310086495%nospam@nospam.invalid nospam >>>><nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> so turn it off. nobody cares. >>>> >>>> That's funny. >>>> >>>> Care to explain the content of this thread, and your participation >>>> in it? >>> >>> That's easy: >> >> Remember: "nobody cares." > > Nobody cares whether you enable Bluetooth. People do care if you > spread misinformation about why you do it though. It's a simple > distinction. > >>> It's one thing to turn off Bluetooth, but it's another to >>> claim the *reason* for doing so is nebulous security or power saving >>> reasons without any evidence whatsoever to back up those assertions. >> >> So, where, exactly did I make any claims about security or power >> saving, or anything at all beyond that I turned it off? > > You may not have but others certainly did - hence this thread. So it would appear that your beef is actually with some of your own fanbois. Good luck with that. -- bert@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 19:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cmgqjqFmctlU13@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #46420 |
So to recap: 1. Other people have a discussion about Bluetooth. 2. You butt in asking why we are having this discussion. 3. You dislike the answer, so you sling insults. Nice try, but troll failure. Good luck with that. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bert <bert@iphouse.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 19:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA45C965D5F617VeebleFetzer@127.0.0.1> |
| In reply to | #46422 |
In news:cmgqjqFmctlU13@mid.individual.net Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > So to recap: > > 1. Other people have a discussion about Bluetooth. > 2. You butt in asking why we are having this discussion. > 3. You dislike the answer, so you sling insults. Hallucinating again. I started this thread, remarking that the iOS 8.2 update left my Bluetooth enabled. All the rest is on you and your little friends. > Nice try, but troll failure. > > Good luck with that. -- bert@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 16:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <130320151645090543%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #46424 |
In article <XnsA45C965D5F617VeebleFetzer@127.0.0.1>, Bert <bert@iphouse.com> wrote: > > So to recap: > > > > 1. Other people have a discussion about Bluetooth. > > 2. You butt in asking why we are having this discussion. > > 3. You dislike the answer, so you sling insults. > > Hallucinating again. > > I started this thread, remarking that the iOS 8.2 update left my > Bluetooth enabled. and it was pointed out to you that was *intentional*. it should be *on*. bluetooth on is *required* for a significant amount of functionality and having it on has zero downside and having it off has a huge downside.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 21:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cmh2t3FtecrU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #46424 |
On 2015-03-13, Bert <bert@iphouse.com> wrote: > In news:cmgqjqFmctlU13@mid.individual.net Jolly Roger ><jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > >> So to recap: >> >> 1. Other people have a discussion about Bluetooth. >> 2. You butt in asking why we are having this discussion. >> 3. You dislike the answer, so you sling insults. > > I started this thread, remarking that the iOS 8.2 update left my > Bluetooth enabled. You don't own this thread. Others have and will participate, whether you like it or not. And we will discuss aspects of this topic that may not pertain directly to you. The world doesn't revolve around little, old you. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 14:06 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <130320151406540887%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #46411 |
In article <XnsA45C7E98CDB97VeebleFetzer@127.0.0.1>, Bert <bert@iphouse.com> wrote: > > It's one thing to turn off Bluetooth, but it's another to > > claim the *reason* for doing so is nebulous security or power saving > > reasons without any evidence whatsoever to back up those assertions. > > So, where, exactly did I make any claims about security or power saving, > or anything at all beyond that I turned it off? the other person mentioned security. what are *your* reasons? other than security or power saving, what possible reason could there be to turn it off? and why are you ignoring all of the benefits for leaving it on? do you even know what they are?? (no).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bert <bert@iphouse.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 18:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA45C8B7B42813VeebleFetzer@127.0.0.1> |
| In reply to | #46416 |
In news:130320151406540887%nospam@nospam.invalid nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > what are *your* reasons? Somebody in this thread just said "nobody cares." Oh wait, that was you wasn't it? -- bert@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bj <address_is@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 13:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1147726162447964389.458106address_is-invalid.invalid@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #46416 |
nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <XnsA45C7E98CDB97VeebleFetzer@127.0.0.1>, Bert > <bert@iphouse.com> wrote: > >>> It's one thing to turn off Bluetooth, but it's another to >>> claim the *reason* for doing so is nebulous security or power saving >>> reasons without any evidence whatsoever to back up those assertions. >> >> So, where, exactly did I make any claims about security or power saving, >> or anything at all beyond that I turned it off? > > the other person mentioned security. > > what are *your* reasons? > > other than security or power saving, what possible reason could there > be to turn it off? > > and why are you ignoring all of the benefits for leaving it on? do you > even know what they are?? (no). It would be nice of you to say what a few of those benefits are (if there are any) that I don't know I'm missing. bj
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 19:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cmgqoaFmctlU14@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #46418 |
On 2015-03-13, bj <address_is@invalid.invalid> wrote: > > It would be nice of you to say what a few of those benefits are (if there > are any) that I don't know I'm missing. I won't speak for nospam, but I know several (but certainly not all) have already been mentioned in this thread. I doubt anyone is interested in repeating them, nor interested in making an exhaustive list for you. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bert <bert@iphouse.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 19:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA45C9673A52CBVeebleFetzer@127.0.0.1> |
| In reply to | #46423 |
In news:cmgqoaFmctlU14@mid.individual.net Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > I doubt anyone is interested in repeating them, nor interested in > making an exhaustive list for you. You really have no idea, do you? -- bert@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 16:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <130320151645090597%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #46425 |
In article <XnsA45C9673A52CBVeebleFetzer@127.0.0.1>, Bert <bert@iphouse.com> wrote: > > > I doubt anyone is interested in repeating them, nor interested in > > making an exhaustive list for you. > > You really have no idea, do you? his point is that several people have listed the various things bluetooth is used for and you and others are refusing to acknowledge all of the benefits, so why keep listing it over and over when it's clear that you aren't interested in an answer. nevertheless, a more exhaustive list is in another post.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 21:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cmh243FtecrU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #46430 |
On 2015-03-13, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <XnsA45C9673A52CBVeebleFetzer@127.0.0.1>, Bert ><bert@iphouse.com> wrote: > >> >> > I doubt anyone is interested in repeating them, nor interested in >> > making an exhaustive list for you. >> >> You really have no idea, do you? > > his point is that several people have listed the various things > bluetooth is used for and you and others are refusing to acknowledge > all of the benefits, so why keep listing it over and over when it's > clear that you aren't interested in an answer. > > nevertheless, a more exhaustive list is in another post. Exactly. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 21:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnmg6n8r.4lv.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #46425 |
Okay, so one time? In band camp? Bert <bert@iphouse.com> was all, like: > In news:cmgqoaFmctlU14@mid.individual.net Jolly Roger > <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >> I doubt anyone is interested in repeating them, nor interested in >> making an exhaustive list for you. > You really have no idea, do you? Great reading comprehension there, troll. -- http://2blog.kreme.com And east is east and west is west and if you take cranberries and stew them like applesauce they taste much more like prunes than rhubarb does.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 16:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <130320151645070480%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #46418 |
In article <1147726162447964389.458106address_is-invalid.invalid@news.giganews.com>, bj <address_is@invalid.invalid> wrote: > > and why are you ignoring all of the benefits for leaving it on? do you > > even know what they are?? (no). > > It would be nice of you to say what a few of those benefits are (if there > are any) that I don't know I'm missing. it's been mentioned several times in this thread but here's a longer list (and possibly not complete): location services, airdrop, continuity, instant hotspot, game center, multi-peer connectivity, ibeacon, bluetooth le devices and applewatch. the watch doesn't affect anyone *yet* but it will for some. the point is that bluetooth is *way* more than for just a keyboard or headset and is used in all sorts of ways that people don't realize and *without* needing to explicitly pair to another device.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-13 13:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <rIGdnU7107rg0J7InZ2dnUU7-RWdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #46428 |
>>> and why are you ignoring all of the benefits for leaving it on? do you
>>> even know what they are?? (no).
>>
>> It would be nice of you to say what a few of those benefits are (if there
>> are any) that I don't know I'm missing.
>
> it's been mentioned several times in this thread but here's a longer
> list (and possibly not complete):
>
> location services, airdrop, continuity, instant hotspot, game center,
> multi-peer connectivity, ibeacon, bluetooth le devices and applewatch.
For me, I don't use those. Isn't cellular also used for locations? That
is enabled manually (caps suck) when not on wifi.
--
"He who cannot pick up an ant, and wants to pick up an elephant will
some day see his folly." --African
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
\ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.ipad
csiph-web