Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.mobile.android > #146079 > unrolled thread

EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025

Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android

Contents

  EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Isaac Montara <IsaacMontara@nospam.com> - 2025-01-03 00:09 -0500
    Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> - 2025-01-03 09:47 +0000
      Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2025-01-03 10:04 +0000
        Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> - 2025-01-03 10:08 +0000
          Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2025-01-03 11:33 +0000
            Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 13:12 +0000
              Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2025-01-03 19:03 +0000
                Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 11:22 -0800
                  Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-01-08 13:46 -0500
          Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 13:12 +0000
        Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 10:14 +0000
          Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 MikeS <MikeS@fred.com> - 2025-01-03 10:29 +0000
            Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 13:20 +0000
              Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2025-01-03 19:07 +0000
                Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 11:22 -0800
          Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Pamela <pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 16:17 +0000
            Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-01-05 16:29 +0000
              Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 16:45 +0000
                Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> - 2025-01-05 17:25 +0000
                  Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 17:33 +0000
                    Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> - 2025-01-05 17:44 +0000
                      Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 17:47 +0000
                        Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> - 2025-01-05 18:05 +0000
                          Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-01-05 20:19 +0000
                            Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> - 2025-01-05 20:44 +0000
                              Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2025-01-06 10:15 +1300
                              Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-05 22:29 +0100
    Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-08 21:02 +0100
      Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-08 12:20 -0800
        Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-08 22:44 +0100
      Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-01-08 20:37 +0000
        Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> - 2025-01-08 20:44 +0000
          Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-08 22:57 +0100
        Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-01-09 16:22 +0000
          Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-09 20:46 +0100
            Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-01-09 20:49 +0000
              Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-09 22:01 +0100
                Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-01-10 00:36 +0000
                  Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-09 17:52 -0800
                  Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-10 04:17 +0100
                    Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-01-10 06:43 +0000
                      Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-10 00:47 -0800
                Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-10 15:47 +0000
                  Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-10 20:29 +0100
                    Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-01-10 21:20 +0000
                      Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-10 22:42 +0100
                        Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-01-10 23:13 +0000
                          Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-11 03:18 +0100
                            Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-01-11 05:18 +0000
                              Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-11 15:27 +0100
                                Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-01-11 17:32 +0000
                                  Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-01-13 18:00 +0100
                                    Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-13 09:15 -0800
                                      Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-01-14 11:41 +0100
                                        Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2025-01-14 13:17 +0100
                                          Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-01-14 16:16 +0100
                                            Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2025-01-14 20:55 +0100
                                              Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-14 14:07 -0800
                                          Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-01-14 16:11 +0100
                                            Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2025-01-14 20:52 +0100
                                              Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-14 20:00 +0000
                                                Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-14 23:11 +0100
                                              Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-01-15 07:01 +0100
                                                Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 11:22 +0000
                                                  Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-01-15 13:23 +0100
                                      Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2025-01-14 09:56 -0700
                                  Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-13 23:22 +0100
                                    Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-01-14 07:46 +0100
                                      Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-14 13:33 +0100
                                        Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-14 14:26 +0000
                                          Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-14 23:05 +0100
                                            Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-01-23 04:03 +0000
                                              Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-22 20:31 -0800
                                        Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-01-14 17:54 +0100
                                          Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-14 23:05 +0100
                                            Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-01-15 21:36 +0100
                                              Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-01-23 04:14 +0000
                                                Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-22 20:32 -0800
                                                  Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-23 10:20 +0100
                  Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-01-10 21:15 +0000
                    Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> - 2025-01-10 17:16 -0600
                    Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-01-11 22:19 +0100
                      Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-01-12 16:38 +0000
                        Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-01-12 21:31 +0100
                          Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-01-12 22:36 +0000
                            Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-01-13 07:37 +0100
                              Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Siard <xx@xx.invalid> - 2025-01-13 11:32 +0100
                                Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-01-13 18:09 +0100
                                Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-13 09:13 -0800
                                Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-01-13 20:35 +0100
                                Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-13 23:32 +0100
                              Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-13 21:31 +0000
                                Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-01-14 07:18 +0100
                                  Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-14 07:37 +0000
                            Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-01-13 18:05 +0100
    Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-25 12:13 -0800
      Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Isaac Montara <IsaacMontara@nospam.com> - 2025-01-25 17:39 -0500
        Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-25 16:59 -0800
          Re: EU new labelling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-26 03:22 +0100
          Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Isaac Montara <IsaacMontara@nospam.com> - 2025-01-25 21:44 -0500
            Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-25 19:57 -0800
            Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-26 17:39 -0800
              Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-27 12:57 +0100
                Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-27 10:31 -0800
                Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2025-01-28 10:25 +1300
                  Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Peter <confused@nospam.net> - 2025-01-27 21:38 +0000
                    Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-27 13:56 -0800
                      Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-28 01:39 +0100
                        Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-27 16:41 -0800
                          Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-28 12:38 +0100
                            Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-28 12:39 -0800
                              Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-28 23:21 +0100
                                Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-28 14:35 -0800
            Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025 Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-27 07:32 +0000

Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6  Next page →

#146382

On 1/10/2025 3:15 PM, Marion wrote:
> I'm extremely consistent.

nope, you nym shyft often.

-- 
I Stand With Israel!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#146395

Marion,

> How I react to you depends on what YOU say, Frank.

Whohoo, a tautology  (read: meaningless statements are meaningless).

> I'm extremely consistent.

Absolutily.

If someone disagrees with you, you insult them by telling them they are
dumb. Full stop.

The only way to keep you from insulting someone is by them agreeing with
/whatever/ you say.

The only one, between your ears, who knows what the truth is is you, and
*only* you.

... even if you cannot support such claims or even just explain them.

... and nonwithstanding your never-ending stream of "gimme, gimme, gimme"
hair-brained questions (with you asking *us* for knowledge *you*, obviously,
do not have - but still we are the "dumb" ones. Go figure).

Kiddo, you are a mental case.

And by the way, hospitals get faster-and-faster with those sex-change
operations, don't they ?  Just a week ago you where andrew, and now you are
already up-and-about as marion.

Regards,
Rudy Wieser

p.s
I tried to find one of your tutorials, by using, as you posted it, the
pictures name, its description, and even your old "arlen holder" nym.   None
of the search engines I tried returned a hit.   Your posting "for posterity"
of your "tutorials" seems to have had a very short shelf life...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#146399

On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 22:19:14 +0100, R.Wieser wrote :


> I tried to find one of your tutorials, by using, as you posted it, the
> pictures name, its description, and even your old "arlen holder" nym.   None
> of the search engines I tried returned a hit.   Your posting "for posterity"
> of your "tutorials" seems to have had a very short shelf life...

Hi Rudy,

I'm trying to get back to kind-hearted writing of helpful tutorials, so
it's not good that people like you & Carlos whine like little girls here.

Your whole life you've been told you are stupid; that statement shows why.
Same with Carlos. You *hate* that you're stupid. So you blame me for that.

To wit, for the iPhone newsgroup:
 <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/search?q=tutorial%20arlen>

For the Android newsgroup:
 <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/search?q=tutorial%20arlen>

For someone to say they can't find the tutorials just means they are
stupid. Yet for you to conclude they don't exist is *why* you're stupid.

For the Windows newsgroup:
 <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.microsoft.windows/search?q=tutorial%20arlen>

There are so many of them, I can't even find them all myself, Rudy.
But just one page is more added value than you've added your whole life.

For the Linux newsgroup:
 <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.os.linux/search?q=tutorial%20arlen>

People like you & Carlos were told by everyone that you're stupid.
The reason is obvious given neither of you has any value to add.

All you can do is whine & cry that everyone is smarter than you are.
Please reply with just one purposefully helpful tutorial you wrote.

Carlos: Respond with just one tutorial that you've written.
Rudy: Same with you. Just one purposefully helpful tutorial you wrote.

Name just one.

Now can we get back to writing kind-hearted helpful tutorials please?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#146400

"Marion",

> I'm trying to get back to kind-hearted writing of helpful tutorials, so
> it's not good that people like you & Carlos whine like little girls here.

Are you denying that you insult people (and) calling them stupid ?

Are you denying that you copy-pasted something I wrote and tried to make it 
sound that I agreed with you about something completely different ?

Are you denying that you claimed that someone who's response did not even 
come /near/ your question was the only one who understood your question ?

> Your whole life you've been told you are stupid; that statement shows 
> why.Same with Carlos. You *hate* that you're stupid. So you blame me for 
> that.

:-)  Kiddo, you are making claims about my life you have no way of knowing. 
The only reason you doing it is to convince yourself.  You call everyone 
dumb because *you* can't cope with the idea that you aren't the smartest 
person around, or even in this newsgroup.

> All you can do is whine & cry that everyone is smarter than you are.

I encounter "dumber" and "smarter" people regulary, even in this newsgroup. 
Its a fact of life.  The first I can, when they ask, help with what I know, 
and I can learn from the others.

> Please reply with just one purposefully helpful tutorial you wrote.

If I did, that would help *me* ... how ?      And no, your assessment of 
what I, or anyone else for that matter, created would be directly suspect, 
as you consider yourself the best-of-the-best, no matter what.

Besides, I have no wish to see you butcher something I wrote into one of 
those "tutorials" you like(d) to churn out.

I also remember that time where you tried to demand that I should prove my 
worth to you - by giving you exactly the answers you needed, and you where 
very pushy about it (gee, I wonder why...).

Thats right, this is not the first time you are trying to play this game 
with me.

Also, its *you* who measures someones worth by the number of tutorials they 
write.  I certainly don't.

> Rudy: Same with you. Just one purposefully helpful tutorial you wrote.

I will think of that after I see you post your own first "purposefully 
helpful" tutorial.

And no, putting a billboard saying "prime land, ready for house-building" in 
the middle of a snake and crocodile swamp does not magically make it so.

> Now can we get back to writing kind-hearted helpful tutorials please?

Beside the problem that most, or not all of them are downright garbage, how 
is your "asking that others do all the legwork for impossible "requests" in 
any way "kindharted" or even just "helpfull" to them ?

How is your "all of you are dumb!" shrieking the moment someone disagrees 
with you in any way "kindharted" or "helpfull" ?

No kiddo, it doesn't even matter if your tutorials where actually upto snuff 
when you treat the people from which you get your knowledge that way.

Regards,
Rudy Wieser

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#146401

On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:31:33 +0100, R.Wieser wrote :

> Also, its *you* who measures someones worth by the number of tutorials they 
> write.  I certainly don't.

Can we get back to helping people learn how to use their mobile devices?
Please reply with just one purposefully helpful tutorial you've written.
Thanks!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#146403

"Marion".,

> Can we get back to helping people learn how to use their mobile devices?

Ah yes, the famous "I don't like this conversation anymore" evasion attempt.

Kiddo, in my previous reply you've been presented with a number of questions 
and rebuttals which you can't/refuse to deal with, and are now trying to 
make a run for it.  Just like your dropping of your "andrew" nym and coming 
back with this "marion" one.  Noone has noticed that either, no sirree! /s

Kiddo, you may think you are a smooth operator, but you are *way* to 
obvious - even to someone like me.

Than again, you still thinking that you can get away with such shennigans 
but me (again) picking up on them might just mean I'm (much) smarter than 
you. :-p

> Please reply with just one purposefully helpful tutorial you've written.

[quote= previous reply]
Besides, I have no wish to see you butcher something I wrote into one of
those "tutorials" you like(d) to churn out.

I also remember that time where you tried to demand that I should prove my
worth to you - by giving you exactly the answers you needed, and you where
very pushy about it (gee, I wonder why...).
[/quote]

A rather famous (to me) quote:
"insanity is to do the same thing over-and-over again while expecting 
different results".

Regards,
Rudy Wieser

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#146406

R.Wieser:
> "Marion":
> > Can we get back to helping people learn how to use their mobile
> > devices?
> 
> Ah yes, the famous "I don't like this conversation anymore" evasion
> attempt.  ...etc.

I would certainly welcome an end to all this hate talk.
As far as I can see, 'Marion' has no evil intentions, and everyone has
his peculiarities.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#146410

On 13.01.25 11:32, Siard wrote:
> R.Wieser:
>> "Marion":
>>> Can we get back to helping people learn how to use their mobile
>>> devices?
>>
>> Ah yes, the famous "I don't like this conversation anymore" evasion
>> attempt.  ...etc.
> 
> I would certainly welcome an end to all this hate talk.
> As far as I can see, 'Marion' has no evil intentions, and everyone has
> his peculiarities.

I strongly disagree. Marion as she calls herself is an absolute newbie
and tries to guide what is right and what is wrong. One more wrong step
and she disappears in my killfile like all other Arlen-identities.

-- 
"Roma locuta, causa finita." (Augustinus)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#146411

On 2025-01-13 02:32, Siard wrote:
> R.Wieser:
>> "Marion":
>>> Can we get back to helping people learn how to use their mobile
>>> devices?
>>
>> Ah yes, the famous "I don't like this conversation anymore" evasion
>> attempt.  ...etc.
> 
> I would certainly welcome an end to all this hate talk.
> As far as I can see, 'Marion' has no evil intentions, and everyone has
> his peculiarities.

Then you can't see very far is all I can tell you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#146414

Siard,

> I would certainly welcome an end to all this hate talk.

How is confronting someone with his own bad behaviour "hate talk" ?  Is that 
some new woke "alternate truth" thing perhaps ?

> As far as I can see, 'Marion' has no evil intentions,

Neither does a zonked out drunkard, but I still don't have to accept him 
barfing all over me either.

> and everyone has his peculiarities.

True.

One of "marion"s peculiarities is being abusive toward any-and-everyone who 
doesn't agree with him.  And I/we do not need to accept that.

Another "peculiarity" of him is to ask/cajole others into doing shitloads of 
work for him, stuff he could easily do himself - Which I definitily consider 
to be a form of, as you call it, evil.

And do notice that our esteemed "marion" here doesn't (wish to) respond to 
pretty-much anything I confront him with.  Shall we also white-wash that as 
a "peculiarity" ?

Nah, I don't think so.

Regards,
Rudy Wieser

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#146418

On 2025-01-13 11:32, Siard wrote:
> R.Wieser:
>> "Marion":
>>> Can we get back to helping people learn how to use their mobile
>>> devices?
>>
>> Ah yes, the famous "I don't like this conversation anymore" evasion
>> attempt.  ...etc.
> 
> I would certainly welcome an end to all this hate talk.
> As far as I can see, 'Marion' has no evil intentions, and everyone has
> his peculiarities.

No evil intentions? How about "her" insults when we don't agree with 
"her"? He has been doing that for years.

I can talk with his multiple identities as long as he remains civil. 
Which is difficult because changing names is a highly trollish 
behaviour. Finding out a new identity puts me in a bad humour.

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#146415

R.Wieser <address@is.invalid> wrote:
>
> 
> A rather famous (to me) quote:
> "insanity is to do the same thing over-and-over again while expecting 
> different results".

Right. So why bother with Marion at all? You are only driving yourself
insane. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#146419

Chris,

>> A rather famous (to me) quote:
>> "insanity is to do the same thing over-and-over again while expecting
>> different results".
>
> Right. So why bother with Marion at all?

You mean now ?   I normally don't, but was named/adressed directly*, and 
I've been learned that its anti-social not to respond.

* which kept the converation outof my killfile bin.  Normally I don't see 
arlens post - up until he changes his nym again.

> You are only driving yourself insane.

What makes you think I'm not already, know it, and consider that to be /my/ 
"peculiarity"  :-)

"They coming to take me away, ha ha, hee hee, ho ho."

Regards,
Rudy Wieser

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#146421

R.Wieser <address@is.invalid> wrote:
> Chris,
> 
>>> A rather famous (to me) quote:
>>> "insanity is to do the same thing over-and-over again while expecting
>>> different results".
>> 
>> Right. So why bother with Marion at all?
> 
> You mean now ?   I normally don't, but was named/adressed directly*, and 
> I've been learned that its anti-social not to respond.

That's fair. I've done the same in the past. 

> * which kept the converation outof my killfile bin.  Normally I don't see 
> arlens post - up until he changes his nym again.
> 
>> You are only driving yourself insane.
> 
> What makes you think I'm not already, know it, and consider that to be /my/ 
> "peculiarity"  :-)
> 
> "They coming to take me away, ha ha, hee hee, ho ho."

:) 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#146409

On 12.01.25 23:36, Marion wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:31:33 +0100, R.Wieser wrote :
> 
>> Also, its *you* who measures someones worth by the number of tutorials they 
>> write.  I certainly don't.
> 
> Can we get back to helping people learn how to use their mobile devices?
> Please reply with just one purposefully helpful tutorial you've written.
> Thanks!

That is certainly not the purpose of the Usenet, Troll.

-- 
"Roma locuta, causa finita." (Augustinus)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#146517

On 2025-01-02 21:09, Isaac Montara wrote:
> Anyone know how existing & new Google, Samsung & Apple phones are faring?
> https://energy-efficient-products.ec.europa.eu/product-list/smartphones- 
> and-tablets_en
> 
> 1. Resistance to accidental drops or scratches   & protection from dust 
> & water
> 
> 2. Sufficiently durable batteries which can withstand   at least 800 
> charge and discharge cycles   while retaining at least 80% of their 
> initial capacity
> 
> 3. Rules on disassembly and repair, including obligations   for 
> producers to make critical spare parts available   within 5-10 working 
> days, and for 7 years after
>    the end of sales of the product model on the EU market
> 
> 4. Availability of operating system upgrades for longer periods   (at 
> least 5 years from the date of the end of placement on   the market of 
> the last unit of a product model)
> 
> 5. Non-discriminatory access for professional repairers   to any 
> software or firmware needed for the replacement

And the mandate for USB C for charging is already about to impact future 
innovations:

'Oppo’s next foldable is about as thin as USB-C allows'

<https://www.theverge.com/2025/1/20/24347690/oppo-find-n5-oneplus-open-2-thinnest-usb-c-ipx9>

'Oppo’s upcoming Find N5 foldable phone is barely thicker than its own 
USB-C port when unfurled, according to photos released by the company.'

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#146518

On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 12:13:17 -0800, Alan wrote:

> And the mandate for USB C for charging is already about to impact future 
> innovations:

Thank your lucky stars that the lightning cable is no longer allowed.

That kind of non-standard "innovation" belongs in the garbage heap.

Besides, Apple hasn't innovated a single iPhone thing since Jobs died.

Well, Apple removed a few things, if you want to call that innovation.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#146519

On 2025-01-25 14:39, Isaac Montara wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 12:13:17 -0800, Alan wrote:
> 
>> And the mandate for USB C for charging is already about to impact 
>> future innovations:
> 
> Thank your lucky stars that the lightning cable is no longer allowed.

Why?

> 
> That kind of non-standard "innovation" belongs in the garbage heap.

Why?

> 
> Besides, Apple hasn't innovated a single iPhone thing since Jobs died.
> 
> Well, Apple removed a few things, if you want to call that innovation.

I notice nothing you say address the substance of what I wrote.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#146520 — Re: EU new labelling regulations June 20th 2025

On 2025-01-26 01:59, Alan wrote:
> On 2025-01-25 14:39, Isaac Montara wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 12:13:17 -0800, Alan wrote:
>>
>>> And the mandate for USB C for charging is already about to impact 
>>> future innovations:
>>
>> Thank your lucky stars that the lightning cable is no longer allowed.
> 
> Why?
> 
>>
>> That kind of non-standard "innovation" belongs in the garbage heap.
> 
> Why?
> 
>>
>> Besides, Apple hasn't innovated a single iPhone thing since Jobs died.
>>
>> Well, Apple removed a few things, if you want to call that innovation.
> 
> I notice nothing you say address the substance of what I wrote.

Notice that Isaac Montara is Arlen, so that is not strange.


Aside that, I wouldn't care less about this particular impact on 
innovation :-)

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#146521

On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 16:59:40 -0800, Alan wrote:

>> Thank your lucky stars that the lightning cable is no longer allowed.
> 
> Why?
> 
>> 
>> That kind of non-standard "innovation" belongs in the garbage heap.
> 
> Why?
> 
>> 
>> Besides, Apple hasn't innovated a single iPhone thing since Jobs died.
>> 
>> Well, Apple removed a few things, if you want to call that innovation.
> 
> I notice nothing you say address the substance of what I wrote.

Apple making the cable different from all other cables just so that Apple
can sell more lightning cables for their own profit, isn't innovation. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android

csiph-web