Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #144172 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Warren <warrenf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-11-22 03:00 +0000 |
| Last post | 2024-11-23 19:05 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 940 — 57 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Warren <warrenf@gmail.com> - 2024-11-22 03:00 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2024-11-22 08:27 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-11-22 22:34 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-22 09:09 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-11-22 16:25 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-22 20:47 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-11-22 22:29 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-11-23 07:39 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2024-11-24 11:07 +1300
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Isaac Montara <IsaacMontara@nospam.com> - 2024-11-23 18:01 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 18:20 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 16:17 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 20:18 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 17:32 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 21:12 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 18:21 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-06 19:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-06 17:40 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-06 22:00 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2024-11-24 17:59 +1300
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 08:12 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 05:16 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-11-23 14:15 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 11:17 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-11-23 16:35 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 13:32 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 11:03 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 14:32 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 11:50 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-11-23 14:18 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 12:24 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-23 22:12 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting ILikeSushiRolls <none@none.invalid> - 2024-11-24 12:53 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-24 07:17 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Peter <confused@nospam.net> - 2024-11-24 21:39 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 16:45 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 13:51 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting anonymous <anon@anon.com> - 2024-11-25 01:11 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2024-11-24 17:26 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 11:13 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 15:26 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 12:42 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 16:10 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 13:22 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 16:48 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 13:53 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 17:46 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 14:59 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 18:11 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 15:42 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 19:08 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 16:10 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 20:03 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 17:32 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 21:10 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 18:12 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 21:38 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 20:16 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 11:30 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 11:29 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 14:28 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 11:25 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 11:24 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 11:23 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-23 19:14 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 20:13 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 18:14 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-23 21:39 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 07:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-24 13:28 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 14:39 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 12:21 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-24 15:38 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 12:54 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 16:06 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 13:48 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 11:50 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-24 18:20 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 18:33 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 16:09 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 19:20 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 16:23 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 19:50 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 17:09 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 20:34 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 17:44 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 21:03 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 18:17 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 21:37 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 18:42 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 21:58 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 18:59 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 22:19 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 19:32 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-24 22:48 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 19:52 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 23:20 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 23:46 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-25 06:18 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 14:29 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 17:51 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 15:12 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 18:26 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 10:59 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 10:55 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 11:31 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-02 11:16 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 14:09 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-02 13:26 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 14:55 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-03 08:47 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Pierre <pierrej@shaw.ca> - 2024-12-03 09:51 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 10:50 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:35 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:33 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-11-25 22:32 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 23:15 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 23:46 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-25 07:08 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-25 07:46 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-25 08:43 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-25 08:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-25 10:32 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 08:32 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-26 09:58 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 10:35 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 11:13 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 10:45 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-27 12:01 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 12:32 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 12:45 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-27 13:50 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 14:19 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-27 14:32 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 15:05 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 12:28 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 15:54 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 15:58 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-02 11:25 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 14:16 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-02 13:41 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 14:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-03 09:09 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-02 11:24 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-02 13:49 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 14:28 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-02 16:11 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 16:38 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-03 08:58 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-03 13:34 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-04 10:55 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-04 12:45 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-04 09:59 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-04 13:17 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-04 13:01 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-04 12:59 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-03 14:03 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-04 11:00 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-27 16:26 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 16:56 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-02 11:27 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-02 11:21 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 14:13 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-02 13:33 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 14:56 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-03 08:52 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 11:32 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 15:08 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 12:32 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 16:00 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 16:00 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-02 11:18 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 14:10 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-02 13:30 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 10:37 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-26 10:06 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-26 10:03 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 14:32 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 17:54 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 15:15 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-11-27 00:04 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 19:16 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Yon Wane <"yonwane-lol!"@pac2.com> - 2024-11-26 22:27 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 08:29 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 11:18 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting ppd382 <xyz@vote.com> - 2025-03-11 08:13 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Mai Keister <m.keister@altopia.net> - 2025-03-11 13:59 -0700
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "jubox@ovens.net" <jubox@ovens.net> - 2025-03-18 17:48 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting orangeneck <orangeneck@127.0.0.1> - 2025-03-29 22:06 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:42 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 14:31 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 17:53 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 15:13 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 18:28 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 15:38 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 18:58 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 16:16 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 19:42 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 17:33 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 20:48 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-27 06:25 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 11:17 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-06 19:28 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-07 13:18 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 17:03 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 14:17 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 17:39 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 15:40 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 18:53 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 16:01 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 19:19 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 16:45 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 20:14 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 17:31 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 20:43 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 17:48 -0800
Microsoft Linux Distro (was: Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-08 01:53 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 20:58 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:00 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:59 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:56 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:48 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:38 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:36 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 09:48 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 12:55 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 10:01 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 13:13 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 10:24 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-09 13:56 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 10:57 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 08:56 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 14:02 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 11:21 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 14:29 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 11:33 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 09:02 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Wayne Kerr <waynek@msu.edu> - 2024-12-14 21:50 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-14 13:17 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 09:01 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Wayne Kerr <waynek@msu.edu> - 2024-12-14 21:14 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-14 13:17 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-14 16:21 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-14 13:34 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-14 17:09 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-14 14:25 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-14 17:32 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-14 14:41 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-14 17:51 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-14 15:04 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-15 05:56 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-15 09:24 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-15 13:30 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 11:38 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 15:05 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 12:26 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 15:58 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 13:10 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 18:07 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-16 19:56 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 10:39 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:30 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:16 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 13:20 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:33 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 13:43 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:51 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 14:52 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 12:35 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-17 15:39 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:53 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:52 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:52 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-15 15:42 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-15 15:48 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-15 16:47 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-15 17:01 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-15 22:34 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 10:25 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-16 11:40 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 12:02 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-16 12:50 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 12:54 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 11:08 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 14:13 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 11:31 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 14:36 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 11:47 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 15:22 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 12:37 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 16:09 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 13:13 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 18:18 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:25 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 13:39 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:45 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 14:50 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 12:35 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-17 15:45 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:02 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:14 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:01 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 11:56 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 11:55 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 11:54 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 11:54 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 11:53 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 11:50 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 11:48 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 11:46 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 11:13 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 14:35 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 11:45 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 15:20 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 12:37 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 16:10 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 13:14 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 18:20 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:25 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 13:41 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:46 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 14:51 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 12:36 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 16:09 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-17 16:34 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 19:19 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 16:22 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 20:26 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 18:21 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-18 09:03 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-18 09:24 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-18 13:01 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-18 10:36 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-18 14:03 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:41 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting will <willford@yahoo.com> - 2024-12-21 01:50 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-20 17:01 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 20:19 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-20 17:42 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 20:50 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-20 17:53 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 21:57 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-20 19:06 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 22:17 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-21 10:10 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-21 16:10 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:43 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-20 22:05 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 22:15 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 23:31 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-21 08:44 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-21 10:11 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-21 16:13 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Din004 <din004@oracle.com> - 2024-12-25 10:44 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-25 09:26 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-25 11:55 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-26 02:07 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-25 23:07 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting alex <alex_@pintrest.com> - 2024-12-26 00:44 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-26 09:39 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Jon Ball <jon-ball@spectrum.com> - 2024-12-26 22:09 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-26 13:37 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting wasabi <lotso@jollyroger.com> - 2024-12-28 14:33 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 14:36 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 17:43 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 14:47 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 17:55 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 15:55 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 19:00 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 16:02 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 20:30 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 19:02 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 22:07 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 19:42 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 22:48 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 19:53 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 23:04 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 20:07 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 23:16 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 21:53 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 14:09 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 11:21 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 14:34 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 11:37 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 14:47 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 12:15 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 15:22 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 12:42 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 16:08 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 16:40 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 19:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 17:10 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot> - 2024-12-30 04:09 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Red Zone <redzone@trump.com> - 2024-12-30 19:45 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 14:57 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 12:05 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 15:27 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-30 21:25 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2024-12-31 00:54 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-31 06:38 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot> - 2024-12-30 16:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-31 06:36 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:52 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 12:56 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 16:13 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 16:42 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 20:00 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 17:10 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 21:46 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 18:52 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 22:09 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 19:22 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 22:27 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 19:39 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:57 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:56 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:54 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:51 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:50 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:49 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:47 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:45 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:44 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Petry F." <petry_f@hushmail.com> - 2024-12-29 04:25 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 21:54 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:42 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:41 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-28 21:52 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-30 18:23 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 10:30 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 13:42 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 11:23 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 14:55 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 11:58 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 15:25 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 18:07 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 15:19 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 18:41 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 15:43 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-31 06:30 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-31 06:28 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-31 06:27 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 12:04 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 15:26 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 15:13 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 18:23 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 15:40 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 19:14 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 23:04 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 11:52 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Byrd <byrd@someoem.com> - 2025-01-02 03:02 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 21:08 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-01 18:44 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 22:01 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 22:12 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Rudy Ball <rudyball@gmx.com> - 2025-01-03 19:02 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 11:20 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 15:19 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 14:54 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 18:40 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 16:18 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 19:28 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 17:11 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 20:24 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 17:40 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 20:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 19:39 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 14:29 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 12:36 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 20:53 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 18:19 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 21:29 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 18:32 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 21:47 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 19:03 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 22:14 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 19:39 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 22:50 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 23:32 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 08:11 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Clint <clintb@infiniti.net> - 2025-01-13 00:36 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-13 09:16 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 08:11 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Rudy Johnson <rudyj@google.com> - 2025-01-21 14:06 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-21 14:18 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Sadler <sadler@msn.com> - 2025-01-26 06:28 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Rudy Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> - 2025-01-22 03:46 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 08:10 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 08:09 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting AlphaHeater <AlphaHeater21@6959.concepte.store> - 2025-01-06 02:50 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 08:07 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 08:07 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 08:05 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 08:05 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 08:03 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 07:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 07:57 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-31 06:34 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-31 06:32 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-31 06:25 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-01 07:31 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-28 21:50 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2024-12-29 01:30 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-28 21:49 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting wasabi <lotso@jollyroger.com> - 2024-12-28 15:57 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 16:03 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-26 08:39 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 19:24 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-26 11:05 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting ND beat Indy <choke@choke.choke> - 2024-12-20 21:37 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-21 09:35 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 20:17 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-20 17:18 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 20:30 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:41 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:39 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:37 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Gary M. Stewart <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2024-12-25 21:48 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:36 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:34 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:32 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 14:06 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:29 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:28 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:27 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:25 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:23 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:21 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:20 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:19 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:18 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:16 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 11:42 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 15:16 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 12:33 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 16:04 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 13:13 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 18:18 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:20 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-16 16:29 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 17:53 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-16 19:51 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 10:38 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:29 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:18 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 13:23 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:31 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 13:20 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 13:15 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 13:14 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 11:40 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 15:08 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 12:29 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 16:01 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 13:30 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 18:24 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-16 21:11 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:28 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 13:11 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 13:09 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 13:03 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 13:02 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting hank <none@invalid.org> - 2024-12-16 00:02 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 09:06 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-14 18:21 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting hank <none@invalid.org> - 2024-12-15 23:06 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-15 15:41 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Duc Nguyen <dnguyen@somecorp.org> - 2024-12-15 19:10 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-15 22:50 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-15 22:42 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-15 22:35 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 08:56 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 08:51 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 08:49 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:34 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:32 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:31 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-07 23:59 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:30 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Rudy Canoza <rc@thejollykone.con> - 2024-12-08 04:06 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:02 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting T. Walz <tampons4sale@dont-email.me> - 2024-12-08 12:41 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:29 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:28 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:27 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-09 13:46 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 08:48 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:25 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 11:11 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 11:09 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 11:07 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 11:00 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:38 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:36 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:36 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:31 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:31 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-24 22:41 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 23:13 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 23:47 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-25 06:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-25 07:44 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-25 08:18 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-25 08:35 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-25 08:58 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-25 09:09 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-25 10:40 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 08:35 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-26 09:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 10:44 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 10:48 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:49 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:47 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 16:16 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 19:46 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 11:20 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:28 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:25 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:24 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-24 22:40 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 12:37 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 11:49 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 14:38 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 10:23 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 16:00 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 13:49 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:22 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:19 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 11:44 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 10:39 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 14:40 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 12:21 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 16:03 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 13:50 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 17:16 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 17:30 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 14:36 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 17:45 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 14:47 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 18:09 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 16:10 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 19:23 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 16:26 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 16:34 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 19:52 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 17:10 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 20:36 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 17:50 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 21:21 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 18:29 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 21:48 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 18:53 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 14:08 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-25 08:02 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-25 08:32 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-25 10:44 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 14:03 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 13:59 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 14:35 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 17:44 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 14:48 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 18:10 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 16:11 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 19:24 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 16:27 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 19:54 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 17:11 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 20:38 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 17:50 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 21:31 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 18:33 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 21:55 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 18:57 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 22:17 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 19:32 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-06 19:28 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:01 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:14 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:12 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:07 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:02 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:02 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:01 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-24 22:45 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-11-25 06:13 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:18 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-11-25 22:31 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:15 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-11-25 22:27 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-11-26 06:12 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-26 09:50 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-11-26 15:55 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 15:46 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 15:38 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 10:35 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 10:35 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 08:43 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-26 09:52 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 14:59 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting 13 <thisemailisreal@gymgyno.org> - 2024-11-24 19:33 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 14:30 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-11-25 22:25 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 08:42 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-11-26 15:56 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 15:50 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 10:30 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-26 09:47 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 14:29 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 14:29 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 14:27 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 13:56 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 13:53 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 13:51 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 11:35 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 11:22 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 11:19 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 11:16 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-11-23 15:27 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-11-23 18:34 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 13:23 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2024-11-23 20:06 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Mickey D <mickeydavis078XX@ptd.net> - 2024-11-23 21:18 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 18:20 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 13:12 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 11:15 -0600
Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 15:36 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 18:56 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 16:01 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 19:15 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 16:19 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 19:49 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 18:17 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 08:27 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 09:53 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 14:13 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 11:29 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-27 14:45 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 15:12 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 12:15 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 15:44 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 12:49 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 16:21 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 16:02 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 19:14 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-28 14:00 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-27 16:26 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 16:52 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-27 20:01 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-28 10:01 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-28 10:36 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-28 10:44 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-28 14:28 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-28 14:36 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-28 15:58 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-28 14:08 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-28 14:03 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-28 13:56 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-28 19:10 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-28 16:21 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-28 19:52 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-28 19:08 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-28 22:24 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-28 19:38 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-28 23:03 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-28 20:33 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-29 00:24 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-03 09:37 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-03 13:46 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-03 15:06 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-03 17:07 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-03 20:57 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-03 21:05 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-03 19:04 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-12-03 20:07 -0700
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-03 21:42 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-03 22:43 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-03 21:44 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-04 10:34 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-04 00:01 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-29 12:50 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-29 17:29 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-30 07:02 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-30 14:20 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-30 14:35 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-30 14:57 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-30 19:29 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-01 20:23 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-03 09:39 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-03 13:49 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-04 16:30 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-04 19:24 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-05 11:11 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-05 09:35 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-05 18:56 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-05 18:05 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-05 22:20 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-05 19:26 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-05 22:33 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-05 22:52 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-05 18:19 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-05 18:04 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-05 21:52 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-05 22:32 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-05 20:35 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-06 07:35 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-06 09:28 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-06 16:38 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-06 19:25 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-06 19:28 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-06 17:39 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-06 22:00 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-06 22:48 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 17:00 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 14:06 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-06 09:28 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-06 10:14 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-06 13:48 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-06 10:58 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 12:31 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-27 16:31 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 15:01 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 12:27 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 15:52 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-11-27 22:10 +0000
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 17:31 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-11-27 23:07 +0000
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 18:19 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-28 13:58 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-28 19:13 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-28 16:21 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-28 19:53 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-28 19:09 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-28 22:27 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-28 19:35 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-29 12:50 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-29 17:26 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-30 06:59 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2024-11-30 04:34 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-11-30 09:54 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-30 14:22 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-28 13:52 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2024-11-27 19:58 +1300
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 08:31 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2024-11-28 09:23 +1300
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 15:46 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 12:49 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 16:23 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 16:07 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 20:16 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 19:22 -0800
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-28 10:03 -0500
Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-28 14:05 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Wayne <wayne@ksu.e_> - 2024-11-23 19:57 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 15:27 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 12:44 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 16:12 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 13:23 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 16:50 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 13:54 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 17:49 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 15:00 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 18:16 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 15:44 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 19:11 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 16:16 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 20:16 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 17:31 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-11-23 19:43 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 21:07 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 18:14 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 13:09 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 13:08 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 13:03 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-25 16:06 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 12:56 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 12:54 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 12:54 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 12:53 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 12:51 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 12:45 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 12:44 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-11-23 22:06 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 14:13 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-11-23 22:36 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-11-23 23:42 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-11-24 01:49 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 18:18 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-11-24 02:52 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 12:42 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-25 16:15 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 16:43 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 12:40 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-25 14:41 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-11-23 23:20 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 18:49 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 16:04 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 19:31 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-11-23 18:36 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 16:37 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 20:49 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 18:01 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 21:14 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 18:20 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-11-24 00:19 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 20:25 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 13:50 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 13:32 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-23 13:58 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 14:31 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-23 21:51 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-11-23 23:55 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Bill Powell <bill@anarchists.org> - 2024-11-24 00:58 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-23 21:52 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 11:12 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-11-23 14:13 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting EndlessSept <pit@despair.org> - 2024-11-23 12:18 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-11-23 17:05 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 14:14 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-11-24 06:41 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 09:31 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 17:51 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 15:01 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 15:10 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 13:26 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 18:17 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 15:46 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 19:17 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-23 16:21 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 13:28 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 13:27 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com> - 2024-11-23 15:09 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 13:25 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-22 12:55 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2024-11-22 17:10 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-22 12:55 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2024-11-23 09:10 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2024-11-23 19:05 +0100
Page 4 of 47 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 47 Next page →
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-26 14:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vi5i2d$3jtcs$9@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #144410 |
On 2024-11-25 09:29, Scout wrote: > > > "Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:aj25kj1mjp2b0j8f90o5vkgol3nc85s9ir@4ax.com... >> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >> >>>>> you claimed: >>>>> >>>>> 'You're a sucker if you use Apple's crap hardware and software.' >>>>> >>>>> So I'll ask again. >>>> >>>> OK, well, you're paying a premium price for junk software. Is that >>>> clear enough? >>> >>> You haven't yet explained WHY it is "junk software". >>> >>> That much is entirely clear. >> >> >> It's a toy, it's not serious, > > So how many high end professionals find your system to be a "must have"? > >> I mean you have very specific >> applications for macOS that are large, e.g. video editing, but not >> everyone does these things. > > I see, so unless it's something EVERYONE uses.. then it's junk software.. > > In which metric Windows is FAR better than Linux. > > > >> For the average personal-computer user, >> it's just wasted potential, > > Windows > >> you have this nice hardware running >> inferior software, it's powered by Unix to be sure, and has that >> potential within it, but most never realize that. > > EVERY modern OS has Unix as it's base. > > Windows is powered by Unix. No. To be accurate, Windows is NOT powered by Unix. As far as the roots of the OS that began as Windows NT, and which is now Windows 11, it is mostly closely related to VMS. This is hardly surprising, as Microsoft hired Dave Cutler away from DEC to be lead architect on Windows NT. Dave Cutler is on record as having a particular disdain for Unix, BTW.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-25 11:25 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vi2nbg$30846$13@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #144264 |
"Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in message news:vhtvmr$1sst2$8@dont-email.me... > On 2024-11-23 17:03, Joel wrote: >> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >> >>>>> Now, why do you claim their software is "crap"... >>>>> >>>>> ...or is that just more of your bullshit? >>>> >>>> The software is where it really gets weird, the goofy Apple-centric >>>> interface, it's a fine Unix system under the hood to be sure, but who >>>> cares when Linux is a thing? >>> That's not an answer to why you claimed: >>> >>> 'You're a sucker if you use Apple's crap hardware and software.' >>> >>> So I'll ask again. >> >> >> OK, well, you're paying a premium price for junk software. Is that >> clear enough? >> > > You haven't yet explained WHY it is "junk software". Well, at least he's stopped blaming the hardware.... Now I would love to see the performance numbers between his OS and what he considers "junk software". > > That much is entirely clear.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-25 11:24 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vi2nbf$30846$12@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #144257 |
"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message news:5pu4kjhk95ei6nq88i8clllbu6n4m7u47b@4ax.com... > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>> Now, why do you claim their software is "crap"... >>>> >>>> ...or is that just more of your bullshit? >>> >>> The software is where it really gets weird, the goofy Apple-centric >>> interface, it's a fine Unix system under the hood to be sure, but who >>> cares when Linux is a thing? >>That's not an answer to why you claimed: >> >>'You're a sucker if you use Apple's crap hardware and software.' >> >>So I'll ask again. > > > OK, well, you're paying a premium price for junk software. Is that > clear enough? Show us that it's "junk software", then tell us why the professionals use it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-25 11:23 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vi2nbe$30846$11@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #144244 |
"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message news:agr4kjdc9u1ghe5f5it4pqjb203676cke9@4ax.com... > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>>> I'm dumbfounded by the prices of Apple's hardware. $2000 for >>>>> the Mac Studio with 32 GB RAM and 512 GB storage. What a piece of >>>>> shit. >>>> >>>> Sorry, but things aren't "shit" because of their price. >>>> >>>> Have you looked at the benchmarks for that machine... >>>> >>>> ...or better yet (since the Studio is quite a bit out-of-date), the Mac >>>> Mini with an M4Pro, 48GB of RAM and 1TB drive for the same price? >>> >>> I have 32 GB RAM and a 1 TB NVMe drive, admittedly my CPU is older, >>> but one doesn't always need more horsepower, I didn't break the bank >>> to get what I have. >> >>You're still not addressing your claim that the Mac in question is a >>"piece of shit". >> >>What a shocker. > > > Relative to its price. So, it's not about actual performance or the fact your job might be riding on it.. just as long as it's cheap.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-23 19:14 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vhtr60$1rqov$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #144231 |
On 11/23/24 6:11 PM, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> If Trump can call veterans losers and suckers, I sure as fucking hell >>>>>>> can call Apple victims such. >>>>>> >>>>>> How are those two related? "joel"? >>>>> >>>>> Related, no, metaphorically kind of the same use of language. >>>> >>>> OK. So? >>>> Why are YOU using it? >>> >>> Because I'm dumbfounded by the prices of Apple's hardware. $2000 for >>> the Mac Studio with 32 GB RAM and 512 GB storage. What a piece of >>> shit. >> >> Sorry, but things aren't "shit" because of their price. >> >> Have you looked at the benchmarks for that machine... >> >> ...or better yet (since the Studio is quite a bit out-of-date), the Mac >> Mini with an M4Pro, 48GB of RAM and 1TB drive for the same price? > > > I have 32 GB RAM and a 1 TB NVMe drive, admittedly my CPU is older, > but one doesn't always need more horsepower, I didn't break the bank > to get what I have. Except that suitability depends on what one's use case is, and it doesn't matter if we're talking about PCs or cars, or whatever. So yeah, if you're just drooling on USENET, then a 2017 vintage Mac laptop would do you perfectly fine ... I'll sell you one for $199. OTOH, if your work products merit completing them in a timely fashion, then computers are just like race cars: "Speed cost money. How fast can you afford to go?" >>>>>>> Winblows 11 isn't it. Winblows 10 >>>>>>> is a dead end. Macs are overpriced geekware. Linux rules the >>>>>>> desktop. >>>>>> Why do you fail to address a single question I actually asked? >>>>> >>>>> The answer is simple, I paid less to get high-end gear. Please remind me: just what's the specs of this claimed "high-end" gear? >>>> You paid a price in other ways... >>>> >>>> ...and you know it. >>>> >>>> What makes Apple's hardware "crap"? >>>> >>>> Cost is NOT an answer to that question. >>> >>> The price I paid in other ways is called using my brain. Apple drones >>> are sheep. Cost is the answer to the question because not everyone >>> can afford to purchase these elite devices from Apple, not everyone >>> would want to either given the goofiness of the OS. Linux is >>> difficult, I admit, unless one uses Mint casually, but you get so much >>> more bang for buck. >> >> Again, you fail to actually answer the question about in what way >> Apple's hardware is supposedly "crap". >> >> Try again. Seems that Joel's also not factored in his personal costs either, such as the value of not having to worry about stuff. > It's not crap in a literal sense, it's fine enough equipment, but > overpriced. One is paying for the Apple motif, more than the real > value of the hardware and software. It's a racket. Now not saying that you're a cheapskate <g>, but since you've raised this as a 'cost' based claim, even if you really mean 'value', what's your objective metrics which support this? What level of 'high-end' hardware at what initial deployment cost? And the other factor is ... for how long will it stay in service for? And since the future is usually very rosy, what's your track record on your prior hardware lifespans, and at what cost per unit time? For example, a $1500 PC that's still worth $100 when its 7 years old works out to $200/year: how does your historical baseline compare to that which you're being clearly critical of? -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-23 20:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nuu4kjhbujdhuq6sskv5nvlo175mg52ddu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #144247 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >On 11/23/24 6:11 PM, Joel wrote: >> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >> >> I have 32 GB RAM and a 1 TB NVMe drive, admittedly my CPU is older, >> but one doesn't always need more horsepower, I didn't break the bank >> to get what I have. > >Except that suitability depends on what one's use case is, and it >doesn't matter if we're talking about PCs or cars, or whatever. > >So yeah, if you're just drooling on USENET, then a 2017 vintage Mac >laptop would do you perfectly fine ... I'll sell you one for $199. > >OTOH, if your work products merit completing them in a timely fashion, >then computers are just like race cars: "Speed cost money. How fast can >you afford to go?" My CPU is a 2020 model, 10th gen Intel. My motherboard can accept 10th or 11th gen CPUs. >>>>>> I paid less to get high-end gear. > >Please remind me: just what's the specs of this claimed "high-end" gear? I have a Gigabyte AORUS motherboard, not some no-name junk that you'd get in a prefab box on Newegg for a hot price, I have a WD Blue NVMe drive, quality components through and through. You have to assemble your own hardware, to get a good value. Apple and other higher-end OEMs are gouging the crap out of people. >>>>> You paid a price in other ways... >>>>> >>>>> ...and you know it. >>>>> >>>>> What makes Apple's hardware "crap"? >>>>> >>>>> Cost is NOT an answer to that question. >>>> >>>> The price I paid in other ways is called using my brain. Apple drones >>>> are sheep. Cost is the answer to the question because not everyone >>>> can afford to purchase these elite devices from Apple, not everyone >>>> would want to either given the goofiness of the OS. Linux is >>>> difficult, I admit, unless one uses Mint casually, but you get so much >>>> more bang for buck. >>> >>> Again, you fail to actually answer the question about in what way >>> Apple's hardware is supposedly "crap". >>> >>> Try again. > >Seems that Joel's also not factored in his personal costs either, such >as the value of not having to worry about stuff. I live by my computer. As do a lot of people, who are less techy. They pay through the nose, for the privilege. I don't. >> It's not crap in a literal sense, it's fine enough equipment, but >> overpriced. One is paying for the Apple motif, more than the real >> value of the hardware and software. It's a racket. > >Now not saying that you're a cheapskate <g>, but since you've raised >this as a 'cost' based claim, even if you really mean 'value', what's >your objective metrics which support this? > >What level of 'high-end' hardware at what initial deployment cost? > >And the other factor is ... for how long will it stay in service for? > >And since the future is usually very rosy, what's your track record on >your prior hardware lifespans, and at what cost per unit time? > >For example, a $1500 PC that's still worth $100 when its 7 years old >works out to $200/year: how does your historical baseline compare to >that which you're being clearly critical of? I have a 650 watt power supply. I will replace the CPU fan, eventually, that's about the extent of the maintenance to expect. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-23 18:14 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vhu25a$1ur9m$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #144259 |
On 2024-11-23 17:13, Joel wrote: > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >> On 11/23/24 6:11 PM, Joel wrote: >>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>> >>> I have 32 GB RAM and a 1 TB NVMe drive, admittedly my CPU is older, >>> but one doesn't always need more horsepower, I didn't break the bank >>> to get what I have. >> >> Except that suitability depends on what one's use case is, and it >> doesn't matter if we're talking about PCs or cars, or whatever. >> >> So yeah, if you're just drooling on USENET, then a 2017 vintage Mac >> laptop would do you perfectly fine ... I'll sell you one for $199. >> >> OTOH, if your work products merit completing them in a timely fashion, >> then computers are just like race cars: "Speed cost money. How fast can >> you afford to go?" > > > My CPU is a 2020 model, 10th gen Intel. My motherboard can accept > 10th or 11th gen CPUs. > > >>>>>>> I paid less to get high-end gear. >> >> Please remind me: just what's the specs of this claimed "high-end" gear? > > > I have a Gigabyte AORUS motherboard, not some no-name junk that you'd > get in a prefab box on Newegg for a hot price, I have a WD Blue NVMe > drive, quality components through and through. You have to assemble > your own hardware, to get a good value. Apple and other higher-end > OEMs are gouging the crap out of people. And what do you charge for your time when you're working for other people? > > >>>>>> You paid a price in other ways... >>>>>> >>>>>> ...and you know it. >>>>>> >>>>>> What makes Apple's hardware "crap"? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cost is NOT an answer to that question. >>>>> >>>>> The price I paid in other ways is called using my brain. Apple drones >>>>> are sheep. Cost is the answer to the question because not everyone >>>>> can afford to purchase these elite devices from Apple, not everyone >>>>> would want to either given the goofiness of the OS. Linux is >>>>> difficult, I admit, unless one uses Mint casually, but you get so much >>>>> more bang for buck. >>>> >>>> Again, you fail to actually answer the question about in what way >>>> Apple's hardware is supposedly "crap". >>>> >>>> Try again. >> >> Seems that Joel's also not factored in his personal costs either, such >> as the value of not having to worry about stuff. > > > I live by my computer. As do a lot of people, who are less techy. > They pay through the nose, for the privilege. I don't. You pay for it in your time. > > >>> It's not crap in a literal sense, it's fine enough equipment, but >>> overpriced. One is paying for the Apple motif, more than the real >>> value of the hardware and software. It's a racket. >> >> Now not saying that you're a cheapskate <g>, but since you've raised >> this as a 'cost' based claim, even if you really mean 'value', what's >> your objective metrics which support this? >> >> What level of 'high-end' hardware at what initial deployment cost? >> >> And the other factor is ... for how long will it stay in service for? >> >> And since the future is usually very rosy, what's your track record on >> your prior hardware lifespans, and at what cost per unit time? >> >> For example, a $1500 PC that's still worth $100 when its 7 years old >> works out to $200/year: how does your historical baseline compare to >> that which you're being clearly critical of? > > > I have a 650 watt power supply. I will replace the CPU fan, > eventually, that's about the extent of the maintenance to expect. How is that even relevant to the questions you were just asked?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-23 21:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vhu3l6$1rqov$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #144259 |
On 11/23/24 8:13 PM, Joel wrote: > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >> On 11/23/24 6:11 PM, Joel wrote: >>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>> >>> I have 32 GB RAM and a 1 TB NVMe drive, admittedly my CPU is older, >>> but one doesn't always need more horsepower, I didn't break the bank >>> to get what I have. >> >> Except that suitability depends on what one's use case is, and it >> doesn't matter if we're talking about PCs or cars, or whatever. >> >> So yeah, if you're just drooling on USENET, then a 2017 vintage Mac >> laptop would do you perfectly fine ... I'll sell you one for $199. >> >> OTOH, if your work products merit completing them in a timely fashion, >> then computers are just like race cars: "Speed cost money. How fast can >> you afford to go?" > > > My CPU is a 2020 model, 10th gen Intel. My motherboard can accept > 10th or 11th gen CPUs. A "10th gen" Intel CPU would be 'Comet Lake' and there's many variations therein .. from an Xeon or i9 all the way down to Celeron (its below the i3 and Pentium Gold) .. so which one does your "high-end" system have? Here's the list: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet_Lake> And how does it benchmark against the Mac Studio that you've mentioned? I'll cut you a break by choosing the lowest end CPU ever sold in the Studio: the M1 Max cored 2,418 single-core and 12,629 for multi-core in the Geekbench 6 CPU Benchmark. FYI, the current model with the upper tier M2 Ultra is single-core 2,819 & multi-core 21,802. >>>>>>> I paid less to get high-end gear. >> >> Please remind me: just what's the specs of this claimed "high-end" gear? > > I have a Gigabyte AORUS motherboard, not some no-name junk that you'd > get in a prefab box on Newegg for a hot price, ... Sorry, doesn't mean much to me: what's its salient characteristics which relate to it being "high-end"? For example, is it PCI5 or 4? > ... I have a WD Blue NVMe drive, quality components through and through. I think you mentioned that its 1TB, right? And since you didn't mention it, I'm assuming the motherboard has it as a PCI4 single slot, so no boot drive RAID0 configuration. So then what does that benchmark at in, say, Blackmagic's Disk Speed Test software? How much above 7,000 MB/sec does it run while comparing it to the Studio? After all, you did claim "high-end", so you certainly must have done some confirmation testing rather than to just "trust me" assume. > You have to assemble > your own hardware, to get a good value. Apple and other higher-end > OEMs are gouging the crap out of people. There are some profit-centers to avoid for sure, but the adage of a DIY "White Box" generic PCs must always be profoundly cheaper is obsolete: a former (now retired) colleague used to run a side business where he fabricated "White Box" generic PCs to sell at a discount, but he shut down that business close to 20 years ago now, because he found that the competition within the OEM's resulted in narrow enough margins such that he wasn't really making money for his efforts...IIRC, he shut it down when it dropped below $50/unit for all of his assembly time. >>>>>> You paid a price in other ways... >>>>>> >>>>>> ...and you know it. >>>>>> >>>>>> What makes Apple's hardware "crap"? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cost is NOT an answer to that question. >>>>> >>>>> The price I paid in other ways is called using my brain. Apple drones >>>>> are sheep. Cost is the answer to the question because not everyone >>>>> can afford to purchase these elite devices from Apple, not everyone >>>>> would want to either given the goofiness of the OS. Linux is >>>>> difficult, I admit, unless one uses Mint casually, but you get so much >>>>> more bang for buck. >>>> >>>> Again, you fail to actually answer the question about in what way >>>> Apple's hardware is supposedly "crap". >>>> >>>> Try again. >> >> Seems that Joel's also not factored in his personal costs either, such >> as the value of not having to worry about stuff. > > > I live by my computer. As do a lot of people, who are less techy. > They pay through the nose, for the privilege. I don't. Not really what I was referring to. Suffice to say that some people consider their DIY assembly time to be free because they enjoy it as a hobby ... that's fine, so long as they make that claim clearly upfront. Where it gets disingenuous is when they try to claim their time costs nothing, but they won't spend an hour of their supposedly "free" time to come mow my lawn to prove that they don't value their time. >>> It's not crap in a literal sense, it's fine enough equipment, but >>> overpriced. One is paying for the Apple motif, more than the real >>> value of the hardware and software. It's a racket. >> >> Now not saying that you're a cheapskate <g>, but since you've raised >> this as a 'cost' based claim, even if you really mean 'value', what's >> your objective metrics which support this? >> >> What level of 'high-end' hardware at what initial deployment cost? >> >> And the other factor is ... for how long will it stay in service for? >> >> And since the future is usually very rosy, what's your track record on >> your prior hardware lifespans, and at what cost per unit time? >> >> For example, a $1500 PC that's still worth $100 when its 7 years old >> works out to $200/year: how does your historical baseline compare to >> that which you're being clearly critical of? Hmm...a whole bunch of silence here. Hope it was just overlooked by accident. > I have a 650 watt power supply. I will replace the CPU fan, > eventually, that's about the extent of the maintenance to expect. Worrying about rightsizing the PSU? And CPU fans? Oh, right: I *used to* have PCs that had those design issues. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-24 07:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <r886kjhprn1aar44mdrrganoma1ha78jtv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #144283 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >On 11/23/24 8:13 PM, Joel wrote: >>>> >>>> I have 32 GB RAM and a 1 TB NVMe drive, admittedly my CPU is older, >>>> but one doesn't always need more horsepower, I didn't break the bank >>>> to get what I have. >>> >>> Except that suitability depends on what one's use case is, and it >>> doesn't matter if we're talking about PCs or cars, or whatever. >>> >>> So yeah, if you're just drooling on USENET, then a 2017 vintage Mac >>> laptop would do you perfectly fine ... I'll sell you one for $199. >>> >>> OTOH, if your work products merit completing them in a timely fashion, >>> then computers are just like race cars: "Speed cost money. How fast can >>> you afford to go?" >> >> My CPU is a 2020 model, 10th gen Intel. My motherboard can accept >> 10th or 11th gen CPUs. > >A "10th gen" Intel CPU would be 'Comet Lake' and there's many variations >therein .. from an Xeon or i9 all the way down to Celeron (its below the >i3 and Pentium Gold) .. so which one does your "high-end" system have? > >Here's the list: ><https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet_Lake> > >And how does it benchmark against the Mac Studio that you've mentioned? > >I'll cut you a break by choosing the lowest end CPU ever sold in the >Studio: the M1 Max cored 2,418 single-core and 12,629 for multi-core in >the Geekbench 6 CPU Benchmark. FYI, the current model with the upper >tier M2 Ultra is single-core 2,819 & multi-core 21,802. It's an i5-10400, not the most high-end piece of the puzzle, that'd be the motherboard and power supply about equally so, but for my purposes it's as good as I really need. And could be replaced with an 11th gen i7, for example, without needing a different motherboard, although I'd need RAM to match it, too. >>>>>>>> I paid less to get high-end gear. >>> >>> Please remind me: just what's the specs of this claimed "high-end" gear? >> >> I have a Gigabyte AORUS motherboard, not some no-name junk that you'd >> get in a prefab box on Newegg for a hot price, ... > >Sorry, doesn't mean much to me: what's its salient characteristics >which relate to it being "high-end"? For example, is it PCI5 or 4? It's meant for elite gaming systems, I wanted it for the expandability, bragging rights, reliability over time. >> ... I have a WD Blue NVMe drive, quality components through and through. > >I think you mentioned that its 1TB, right? And since you didn't mention >it, I'm assuming the motherboard has it as a PCI4 single slot, so no >boot drive RAID0 configuration. So then what does that benchmark at in, >say, Blackmagic's Disk Speed Test software? > >How much above 7,000 MB/sec does it run while comparing it to the >Studio? After all, you did claim "high-end", so you certainly must have >done some confirmation testing rather than to just "trust me" assume. It's one of the better models from its time, there certainly are faster models today with today's motherboards. >> You have to assemble >> your own hardware, to get a good value. Apple and other higher-end >> OEMs are gouging the crap out of people. > >There are some profit-centers to avoid for sure, but the adage of a DIY >"White Box" generic PCs must always be profoundly cheaper is obsolete: >a former (now retired) colleague used to run a side business where he >fabricated "White Box" generic PCs to sell at a discount, but he shut >down that business close to 20 years ago now, because he found that the >competition within the OEM's resulted in narrow enough margins such that >he wasn't really making money for his efforts...IIRC, he shut it down >when it dropped below $50/unit for all of his assembly time. To get my computer, at the time I bought the parts, preassembled, would cost a fortune. To get a seemingly comparable one, you'd at best get some less than comparable parts. The only way to maximize value is to self-assemble. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-24 13:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vhvr8u$2994a$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #144294 |
On 11/24/24 7:59 AM, Joel wrote: > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >> On 11/23/24 8:13 PM, Joel wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I have 32 GB RAM and a 1 TB NVMe drive, admittedly my CPU is older, >>>>> but one doesn't always need more horsepower, I didn't break the bank >>>>> to get what I have. >>>> >>>> Except that suitability depends on what one's use case is, and it >>>> doesn't matter if we're talking about PCs or cars, or whatever. >>>> >>>> So yeah, if you're just drooling on USENET, then a 2017 vintage Mac >>>> laptop would do you perfectly fine ... I'll sell you one for $199. >>>> >>>> OTOH, if your work products merit completing them in a timely fashion, >>>> then computers are just like race cars: "Speed cost money. How fast can >>>> you afford to go?" >>> >>> My CPU is a 2020 model, 10th gen Intel. My motherboard can accept >>> 10th or 11th gen CPUs. >> >> A "10th gen" Intel CPU would be 'Comet Lake' and there's many variations >> therein .. from an Xeon or i9 all the way down to Celeron (its below the >> i3 and Pentium Gold) .. so which one does your "high-end" system have? >> >> Here's the list: >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet_Lake> >> >> And how does it benchmark against the Mac Studio that you've mentioned? >> >> I'll cut you a break by choosing the lowest end CPU ever sold in the >> Studio: the M1 Max cored 2,418 single-core and 12,629 for multi-core in >> the Geekbench 6 CPU Benchmark. FYI, the current model with the upper >> tier M2 Ultra is single-core 2,819 & multi-core 21,802. > > It's an i5-10400, not the most high-end piece of the puzzle, that'd be > the motherboard and power supply about equally so, but for my purposes > it's as good as I really need. Looks like the i5-10400 has a Geekbench of 1446 single and 5535 multi-core, which is 40%-60% lower than the original Mac Studio, so call it as roughly "half the horsepower". > And could be replaced with an 11th gen > i7, for example, without needing a different motherboard, although I'd > need RAM to match it, too. Browsing Geekbench to find parity to the original Studio I mentioned, I found some Intel Core i9's that are in the Studio's ballpark (eg, 24 core 13900 at 2827/16625)...but I don't know if it is socket-compatible. In any event, the i9-13900 24 core CPU retails for $542 on Amazon today, so that probably is close to what would notionally need to be added to however much you paid (which was how much?) to have rough CPU hardware parity to the original Studio for purposes of a value comparison. Sure, it would be nice if Apple sold more lower-end products, but you chose the Studio, so its what we're stuck with in a comparison. >>>>>>>>> I paid less to get high-end gear. >>>> >>>> Please remind me: just what's the specs of this claimed "high-end" gear? >>> >>> I have a Gigabyte AORUS motherboard, not some no-name junk that you'd >>> get in a prefab box on Newegg for a hot price, ... >> >> Sorry, doesn't mean much to me: what's its salient characteristics >> which relate to it being "high-end"? For example, is it PCI5 or 4? > > It's meant for elite gaming systems, I wanted it for the > expandability, bragging rights, reliability over time. Bragging rights? I certainly hope you're not saying that you paid more for a name(!). >>> ... I have a WD Blue NVMe drive, quality components through and through. >> >> I think you mentioned that its 1TB, right? And since you didn't mention >> it, I'm assuming the motherboard has it as a PCI4 single slot, so no >> boot drive RAID0 configuration. So then what does that benchmark at in, >> say, Blackmagic's Disk Speed Test software? >> >> How much above 7,000 MB/sec does it run while comparing it to the >> Studio? After all, you did claim "high-end", so you certainly must have >> done some confirmation testing rather than to just "trust me" assume. > > > It's one of the better models from its time, there certainly are > faster models today with today's motherboards. That's all nice ... but its sounding like more "brand name" bragging fluff: what is the no-BS hard data from a SSD performance test? FYI, as per <https://www.servethehome.com/wd-blue-sn570-1tb-nvme-ssd-review/2/> ...so it looks like you're in the 2800-3300 MB/s ballpark, so roughly half the bandwidth performance of the Studio you've criticized. >>> You have to assemble >>> your own hardware, to get a good value. Apple and other higher-end >>> OEMs are gouging the crap out of people. >> >> There are some profit-centers to avoid for sure, but the adage of a DIY >> "White Box" generic PCs must always be profoundly cheaper is obsolete: >> a former (now retired) colleague used to run a side business where he >> fabricated "White Box" generic PCs to sell at a discount, but he shut >> down that business close to 20 years ago now, because he found that the >> competition within the OEM's resulted in narrow enough margins such that >> he wasn't really making money for his efforts...IIRC, he shut it down >> when it dropped below $50/unit for all of his assembly time. > > To get my computer, at the time I bought the parts, preassembled, > would cost a fortune. How much more? More than the original Apple Studio's $1999 retail price? (or if you prefer, $2200 with a parity upgrade to 1TB SSD) > To get a seemingly comparable one, you'd at best get some less than > comparable parts. The only way to maximize value is to self-assemble. Which may or may not work, because 'value' relies on fungible components with adequate competition and economy of scale to limit markup. In any event, its looking to me that your system falls well short of the Studio hardware's performance, so trying to do a price comparison between the two without taking this into consideration is ineffective. Now I'm not saying that anyone needs the Studio's performance level: the point is that if one is going to critique price, the comparison must be a valid one. For PCs this traditionally means tweaking specs to be capability peers, even if one personally don't need XYZ capability: this adjustment is to compare Apples to Apples as best we can, because no one OEM seamlessly fills every segment of the market, so there will always be limitations in comparison attempts. This also means that when an individual's capability needs are below the minimum product offered by an OEM, its not the fault of the OEM that they've chosen to not compete in a particular market segment. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-24 14:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <j407kjd0ce6pm3qa435j0un1cofenjeghr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #144298 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> I paid less to get high-end gear. >>>>> >>>>> Please remind me: just what's the specs of this claimed "high-end" gear? >>>> >>>> I have a Gigabyte AORUS motherboard, not some no-name junk that you'd >>>> get in a prefab box on Newegg for a hot price, ... >>> >>> Sorry, doesn't mean much to me: what's its salient characteristics >>> which relate to it being "high-end"? For example, is it PCI5 or 4? >> >> It's meant for elite gaming systems, I wanted it for the >> expandability, bragging rights, reliability over time. > >Bragging rights? I certainly hope you're not saying that you paid more >for a name(!). The motherboard is more relevant to overall quality than a lot of people might realize. It's not paying for a name, it's paying for durability and quality. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-24 12:21 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vi01rf$2cgsl$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #144301 |
On 2024-11-24 11:39, Joel wrote: > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> I paid less to get high-end gear. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please remind me: just what's the specs of this claimed "high-end" gear? >>>>> >>>>> I have a Gigabyte AORUS motherboard, not some no-name junk that you'd >>>>> get in a prefab box on Newegg for a hot price, ... >>>> >>>> Sorry, doesn't mean much to me: what's its salient characteristics >>>> which relate to it being "high-end"? For example, is it PCI5 or 4? >>> >>> It's meant for elite gaming systems, I wanted it for the >>> expandability, bragging rights, reliability over time. >> >> Bragging rights? I certainly hope you're not saying that you paid more >> for a name(!). > > > The motherboard is more relevant to overall quality than a lot of > people might realize. It's not paying for a name, it's paying for > durability and quality. > You're the one who literally said: "bragging rights".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-24 15:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vi02rv$29cb7$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #144303 |
On 11/24/24 3:21 PM, Alan wrote: > On 2024-11-24 11:39, Joel wrote: >> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I paid less to get high-end gear. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please remind me: just what's the specs of this claimed "high- >>>>>>> end" gear? >>>>>> >>>>>> I have a Gigabyte AORUS motherboard, not some no-name junk that you'd >>>>>> get in a prefab box on Newegg for a hot price, ... >>>>> >>>>> Sorry, doesn't mean much to me: what's its salient characteristics >>>>> which relate to it being "high-end"? For example, is it PCI5 or 4? >>>> >>>> It's meant for elite gaming systems, I wanted it for the >>>> expandability, bragging rights, reliability over time. >>> >>> Bragging rights? I certainly hope you're not saying that you paid more >>> for a name(!). >> >> >> The motherboard is more relevant to overall quality than a lot of >> people might realize. It's not paying for a name, it's paying for >> durability and quality. >> > > You're the one who literally said: > "bragging rights". While also snipping a whole bunch of other objective metrics. Gosh, it musta been another "accident"... ...instead of a tacit admission through avoidance that he knows that he can't support his assertion that he made a rational product decision. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-24 12:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vi03qj$2cj1m$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #144305 |
On 2024-11-24 12:38, -hh wrote: > On 11/24/24 3:21 PM, Alan wrote: >> On 2024-11-24 11:39, Joel wrote: >>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I paid less to get high-end gear. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please remind me: just what's the specs of this claimed "high- >>>>>>>> end" gear? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have a Gigabyte AORUS motherboard, not some no-name junk that >>>>>>> you'd >>>>>>> get in a prefab box on Newegg for a hot price, ... >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry, doesn't mean much to me: what's its salient characteristics >>>>>> which relate to it being "high-end"? For example, is it PCI5 or 4? >>>>> >>>>> It's meant for elite gaming systems, I wanted it for the >>>>> expandability, bragging rights, reliability over time. >>>> >>>> Bragging rights? I certainly hope you're not saying that you paid more >>>> for a name(!). >>> >>> >>> The motherboard is more relevant to overall quality than a lot of >>> people might realize. It's not paying for a name, it's paying for >>> durability and quality. >>> >> >> You're the one who literally said: >> "bragging rights". > > > While also snipping a whole bunch of other objective metrics. > > Gosh, it musta been another "accident"... > > ...instead of a tacit admission through avoidance that he knows that he > can't support his assertion that he made a rational product decision. Funny that, ain't it? 😉
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-24 16:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9757kjp8pi1klqhk7didm6jdhgo3juutdn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #144305 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >On 11/24/24 3:21 PM, Alan wrote: >> On 2024-11-24 11:39, Joel wrote: >>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I paid less to get high-end gear. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please remind me: just what's the specs of this claimed "high- >>>>>>>> end" gear? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have a Gigabyte AORUS motherboard, not some no-name junk that you'd >>>>>>> get in a prefab box on Newegg for a hot price, ... >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry, doesn't mean much to me: what's its salient characteristics >>>>>> which relate to it being "high-end"? For example, is it PCI5 or 4? >>>>> >>>>> It's meant for elite gaming systems, I wanted it for the >>>>> expandability, bragging rights, reliability over time. >>>> >>>> Bragging rights? I certainly hope you're not saying that you paid more >>>> for a name(!). >>> >>> The motherboard is more relevant to overall quality than a lot of >>> people might realize. It's not paying for a name, it's paying for >>> durability and quality. >> >> You're the one who literally said: >> "bragging rights". > >While also snipping a whole bunch of other objective metrics. > >Gosh, it musta been another "accident"... > >...instead of a tacit admission through avoidance that he knows that he >can't support his assertion that he made a rational product decision. Incorrect. I don't care about benchmarks. I care about having a modern, reliable, functional system. And not breaking the bank to get it. Apple and M$ are endlessly requiring upgrades. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-24 13:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vi06uu$2dfb9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #144309 |
On 2024-11-24 13:06, Joel wrote: > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >> On 11/24/24 3:21 PM, Alan wrote: >>> On 2024-11-24 11:39, Joel wrote: >>>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I paid less to get high-end gear. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please remind me: just what's the specs of this claimed "high- >>>>>>>>> end" gear? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have a Gigabyte AORUS motherboard, not some no-name junk that you'd >>>>>>>> get in a prefab box on Newegg for a hot price, ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry, doesn't mean much to me: what's its salient characteristics >>>>>>> which relate to it being "high-end"? For example, is it PCI5 or 4? >>>>>> >>>>>> It's meant for elite gaming systems, I wanted it for the >>>>>> expandability, bragging rights, reliability over time. >>>>> >>>>> Bragging rights? I certainly hope you're not saying that you paid more >>>>> for a name(!). >>>> >>>> The motherboard is more relevant to overall quality than a lot of >>>> people might realize. It's not paying for a name, it's paying for >>>> durability and quality. >>> >>> You're the one who literally said: >>> "bragging rights". >> >> While also snipping a whole bunch of other objective metrics. >> >> Gosh, it musta been another "accident"... >> >> ...instead of a tacit admission through avoidance that he knows that he >> can't support his assertion that he made a rational product decision. > > > Incorrect. I don't care about benchmarks. I care about having a > modern, reliable, functional system. And not breaking the bank to get > it. Apple and M$ are endlessly requiring upgrades. > So you claim that Apple's hardware is "crap for the money"... ...but won't actually show how much you paid or how good it is. Got it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-25 11:50 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vi2nbk$30846$19@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #144312 |
"Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in message news:vi06uu$2dfb9$1@dont-email.me... > On 2024-11-24 13:06, Joel wrote: >> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>> On 11/24/24 3:21 PM, Alan wrote: >>>> On 2024-11-24 11:39, Joel wrote: >>>>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I paid less to get high-end gear. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Please remind me: just what's the specs of this claimed "high- >>>>>>>>>> end" gear? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have a Gigabyte AORUS motherboard, not some no-name junk that >>>>>>>>> you'd >>>>>>>>> get in a prefab box on Newegg for a hot price, ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry, doesn't mean much to me: what's its salient characteristics >>>>>>>> which relate to it being "high-end"? For example, is it PCI5 or 4? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's meant for elite gaming systems, I wanted it for the >>>>>>> expandability, bragging rights, reliability over time. >>>>>> >>>>>> Bragging rights? I certainly hope you're not saying that you paid >>>>>> more >>>>>> for a name(!). >>>>> >>>>> The motherboard is more relevant to overall quality than a lot of >>>>> people might realize. It's not paying for a name, it's paying for >>>>> durability and quality. >>>> >>>> You're the one who literally said: >>>> "bragging rights". >>> >>> While also snipping a whole bunch of other objective metrics. >>> >>> Gosh, it musta been another "accident"... >>> >>> ...instead of a tacit admission through avoidance that he knows that he >>> can't support his assertion that he made a rational product decision. >> >> >> Incorrect. I don't care about benchmarks. I care about having a >> modern, reliable, functional system. And not breaking the bank to get >> it. Apple and M$ are endlessly requiring upgrades. >> > > So you claim that Apple's hardware is "crap for the money"... > > ...but won't actually show how much you paid or how good it is. > > Got it. I bet he has worse performance than the system he claimed was 'junk'.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-24 18:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vi0ccj$2e8j1$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #144309 |
On 11/24/24 4:06 PM, Joel wrote: > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >> On 11/24/24 3:21 PM, Alan wrote: >>> ... >>> You're the one who literally said: >>> "bragging rights". >> >> While also snipping a whole bunch of other objective metrics. >> >> Gosh, it musta been another "accident"... >> >> ...instead of a tacit admission through avoidance that he knows that he >> can't support his assertion that he made a rational product decision. > > > Incorrect. I don't care about benchmarks. But you're trying to make comparisons of different products, so you need to have some objective methodology to assess each one's relative value. Without that, you're just making a blind "Oranges vs Kiwis" comparison without knowing what either fruit even tastes like. > I care about having a modern, reliable, functional system. And not > breaking the bank to get it. Apple and M$ are endlessly requiring upgrades. Just what upgrades are these which you're referring to? Be specific. Because Apple has been criticized for the past ~decade because most of their Macs' hardware is no longer user-upgradable, which makes your claim effectively impossible. In any event, I've already looked at what info you've provided and noted how CPU & RAM performance levels are roughly half of what you chose to compare them against: how much would it cost you to upgrade your current system to have double the performance on these two metrics? Not that you personally need it, but to determine if your claim that a Studio was overpriced truely is due to brand, not hardware specs. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-24 18:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2jd7kj5qtkqvmsbbne6apflr9e26cbke8o@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #144326 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>> he [JWC] knows that he >>> can't support his assertion that he made a rational product decision. >> >> Incorrect. I don't care about benchmarks. > >But you're trying to make comparisons of different products, so you need >to have some objective methodology to assess each one's relative value. >Without that, you're just making a blind "Oranges vs Kiwis" comparison >without knowing what either fruit even tastes like. I'm not doing data processing, I'm using a computer as an Internet portal, music player, that kind of thing. macOS and Winblows are grossly inferior to Linux, for my purposes. >> I care about having a modern, reliable, functional system. And not >> breaking the bank to get it. Apple and M$ are endlessly requiring upgrades. > >Just what upgrades are these which you're referring to? Be specific. > >Because Apple has been criticized for the past ~decade because most of >their Macs' hardware is no longer user-upgradable, which makes your >claim effectively impossible. > >In any event, I've already looked at what info you've provided and noted >how CPU & RAM performance levels are roughly half of what you chose to >compare them against: how much would it cost you to upgrade your >current system to have double the performance on these two metrics? > >Not that you personally need it, but to determine if your claim that a >Studio was overpriced truely is due to brand, not hardware specs. The upgrade is of the whole system, yes, that's the point. Landfills and third-world countries receive the wasted corporate crapware systems. Whereas my box is still virtually brand new, to me. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-11-24 16:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vi0f7p$2e73h$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #144328 |
On 2024-11-24 15:33, Joel wrote: > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > >>>> he [JWC] knows that he >>>> can't support his assertion that he made a rational product decision. >>> >>> Incorrect. I don't care about benchmarks. >> >> But you're trying to make comparisons of different products, so you need >> to have some objective methodology to assess each one's relative value. >> Without that, you're just making a blind "Oranges vs Kiwis" comparison >> without knowing what either fruit even tastes like. > > > I'm not doing data processing, I'm using a computer as an Internet > portal, music player, that kind of thing. macOS and Winblows are > grossly inferior to Linux, for my purposes. In what specific way is macOS "grossly inferior"? > > >>> I care about having a modern, reliable, functional system. And not >>> breaking the bank to get it. Apple and M$ are endlessly requiring upgrades. >> >> Just what upgrades are these which you're referring to? Be specific. >> >> Because Apple has been criticized for the past ~decade because most of >> their Macs' hardware is no longer user-upgradable, which makes your >> claim effectively impossible. >> >> In any event, I've already looked at what info you've provided and noted >> how CPU & RAM performance levels are roughly half of what you chose to >> compare them against: how much would it cost you to upgrade your >> current system to have double the performance on these two metrics? >> >> Not that you personally need it, but to determine if your claim that a >> Studio was overpriced truely is due to brand, not hardware specs. > > > The upgrade is of the whole system, yes, that's the point. Landfills > and third-world countries receive the wasted corporate crapware > systems. Whereas my box is still virtually brand new, to me. Is it?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 47 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 47 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web