Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #73228 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-01-09 10:11 +0000 |
| Last post | 2021-01-10 10:58 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 391 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 10:11 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Dieter Britz <dieterhansbritz@gmail.com> - 2021-01-09 13:01 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-09 08:16 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 09:34 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-09 12:35 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 11:09 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:49 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:34 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-09 12:41 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 17:47 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-09 14:29 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-09 12:56 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-09 21:29 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 21:03 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:24 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2021-01-09 08:58 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:27 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-09 12:38 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 09:12 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2021-01-09 18:03 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 12:16 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:53 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-10 11:45 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 14:03 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 09:54 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 17:02 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 12:26 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 12:20 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 15:20 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 23:29 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 10:38 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 17:40 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 12:52 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 20:08 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 14:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 13:51 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 05:45 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 09:38 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 03:26 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 19:56 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 07:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-14 10:15 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-14 18:42 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 16:39 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2021-01-11 09:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-11 10:27 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 22:44 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 19:00 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-11 10:27 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-11 17:51 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 13:33 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 08:40 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 20:22 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 10:53 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 18:01 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 12:59 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 20:08 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 14:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 20:19 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 15:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-12 22:51 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-13 02:36 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-13 16:19 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 10:56 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-11 16:34 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-11 10:35 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-11 19:24 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 04:39 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:39 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:29 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Dieter Britz <dieterhansbritz@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:38 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-10 08:55 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 15:41 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 21:48 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-10 19:47 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-11 15:22 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 13:35 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 10:05 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-11 16:20 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-11 13:05 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-11 18:15 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 21:48 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 10:13 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 15:23 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 15:47 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-12 13:11 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-12 15:02 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-12 15:17 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 10:19 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-12 08:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-12 13:41 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 05:51 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people KenW <ken1943@invalid.net> - 2021-01-12 15:58 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-12 18:15 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 07:46 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 21:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-13 02:36 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 14:31 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-12 14:47 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 15:26 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 19:46 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-01-13 08:07 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 08:37 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-13 12:31 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:49 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 11:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-13 16:07 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 18:57 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 21:39 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 22:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 06:02 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 21:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-18 09:10 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 08:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:06 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 12:51 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 09:58 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-18 18:24 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-20 00:18 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-18 18:23 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 14:14 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 13:21 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:42 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 16:16 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 09:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 14:23 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 14:21 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 10:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 15:27 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:13 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:27 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 13:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 15:46 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 09:19 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 13:03 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:25 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 13:38 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-20 21:44 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:44 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-21 19:19 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 11:39 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:52 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:55 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:48 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 22:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:50 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 15:30 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-20 21:46 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:48 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-21 19:20 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 08:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:59 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 15:19 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 16:35 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:40 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 14:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 16:17 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 14:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 17:46 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 10:23 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:42 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 14:20 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 17:46 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 10:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 15:28 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:28 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:47 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Leo <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2021-01-18 20:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 20:42 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 17:45 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:18 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-20 00:28 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 23:42 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 17:43 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-19 11:24 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 05:39 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 08:07 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 19:33 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 11:35 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 15:37 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 14:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 14:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 19:54 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 20:00 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:33 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-21 05:46 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 03:05 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 10:29 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:44 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:00 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:20 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:35 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 10:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:13 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-21 17:27 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:48 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 15:04 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 10:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 19:25 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 14:33 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 11:57 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:20 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 19:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 19:28 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 20:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 22:09 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 12:01 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:25 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 14:29 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 19:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 15:02 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 11:50 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 12:01 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:31 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:47 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-22 10:06 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 09:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 10:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:36 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 13:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:08 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:35 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 11:43 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:46 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 03:02 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:23 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-21 06:06 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:42 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:15 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:47 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 12:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:04 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:20 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:53 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:19 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 19:59 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 15:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 10:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:33 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 07:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 10:33 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 09:27 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 21:20 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 15:46 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 14:12 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:52 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:24 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:44 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:55 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 17:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 12:54 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:07 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:41 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 19:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:32 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 13:09 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 12:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 15:19 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 14:46 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-13 16:14 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:53 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 16:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 22:19 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 14:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-13 13:49 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 13:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:40 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 08:15 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Hergen Lehmann <hlehmann.expires.5-11@snafu.de> - 2021-01-13 22:09 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-13 20:17 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bernd Froehlich <befr@eaglesoft.de> - 2021-01-14 08:02 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 09:43 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-14 07:49 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-14 14:43 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-14 23:53 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 12:15 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 14:34 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 21:28 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-14 17:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 23:02 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 19:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 12:17 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:50 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 13:17 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:34 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:10 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:21 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 13:37 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:41 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:23 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:43 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:51 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:54 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 12:50 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:21 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:13 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 19:50 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-15 06:39 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 18:38 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-15 22:29 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 16:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-15 08:28 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 18:42 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-15 22:29 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 16:16 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-15 21:37 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 17:24 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-15 23:00 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 19:29 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 01:04 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 20:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 11:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 08:48 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 14:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 10:24 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 15:43 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 13:25 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 19:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 16:31 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 23:57 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 19:21 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-17 13:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-17 16:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 11:54 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 13:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:44 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2021-01-16 09:59 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 21:08 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 09:08 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2021-01-16 02:49 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 04:51 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 12:07 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 08:37 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 14:01 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:59 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 13:07 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-18 12:24 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:43 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-16 16:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-15 07:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 03:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-15 11:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 08:07 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 13:06 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 04:16 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-12 22:27 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 11:16 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-13 02:36 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:13 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 15:19 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 07:53 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 13:35 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:58 +0000
Page 15 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15] 16 17 … 20 Next page →
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-20 18:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ruaqa5$u8l$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73897 |
On 2021-01-20 6:41 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > >>>>> Trump's financial status is irrelevant to what collateral >>>>> there is for those particular loans due soon. And my >>>>> source for that is just as good as his, fuckwit. >>>> >>>> He doesn't need a source, sunshine. >>> >>> I don’t either, shitshine. >> >> Yeah... ...you do. >> >> Because you made a claim that I DON'T accept. > > You have always been, and always will be > completely and utterly irrelevant. What > you may or may not accept in spades. > > You are free to research that yourself if you don’t accept it. > > I don’t bother to save everything I read just in case > some pathological liar doesn’t accept it when I state it. > >>>> You accepted what he DID claim which was about loans coming due >>> >>> Nope, I knew that already, from months ago. >> >> Right. And them went on to claim that those loans had "fuck all >> collateral". > > Nope, state that. > >> That's a claim. > > Nope, a statement of fact. > >>>> and nothing about collateral at all. >>> >>> Pity about what I came across months ago. >> >> Which you won't present here for what reason? > > I don’t bother to save everything I read just in case > some pathological liar doesn’t accept it when I state it. > > You are free to research that if you don’t believe it. Got it: You have NOTHING. > >>> <reams of your shit any 3 year old could >>> leave for dead flushed where it belongs> >>> >>>>>> ...or are you going to claim I'm misquoting you about that? >>>>> >>>>> You clearly did just that and were stupid enough to leave the >>>>> original this time too. >>> >>>> I used a neutral term in place of your hyperbole. >>> >>> There is no hyperbole in what I said, its fact. >> >> Your support for that claim is where? > > Don’t need any, you are free to > research that if you don’t believe it. Your job to provide support for YOUR claims, sunshine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 14:15 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6s9uuFngpdU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73901 |
"Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message news:ruaqa5$u8l$2@dont-email.me... > On 2021-01-20 6:41 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >>>>>> Trump's financial status is irrelevant to what collateral >>>>>> there is for those particular loans due soon. And my >>>>>> source for that is just as good as his, fuckwit. >>>>> >>>>> He doesn't need a source, sunshine. >>>> >>>> I don’t either, shitshine. >>> >>> Yeah... ...you do. >>> >>> Because you made a claim that I DON'T accept. >> >> You have always been, and always will be >> completely and utterly irrelevant. What >> you may or may not accept in spades. >> >> You are free to research that yourself if you don’t accept it. >> >> I don’t bother to save everything I read just in case >> some pathological liar doesn’t accept it when I state it. >> >>>>> You accepted what he DID claim which was about loans coming due >>>> >>>> Nope, I knew that already, from months ago. >>> >>> Right. And them went on to claim that those loans had "fuck all >>> collateral". >> >> Nope, state that. >> >>> That's a claim. >> >> Nope, a statement of fact. >> >>>>> and nothing about collateral at all. >>>> >>>> Pity about what I came across months ago. >>> >>> Which you won't present here for what reason? >> >> I don’t bother to save everything I read just in case >> some pathological liar doesn’t accept it when I state it. >> >> You are free to research that if you don’t believe it. > Got it: Nope. > You have NOTHING. Neither do you on your original claim. >>>> <reams of your shit any 3 year old could >>>> leave for dead flushed where it belongs> >>>> >>>>>>> ...or are you going to claim I'm misquoting you about that? >>>>>> >>>>>> You clearly did just that and were stupid enough to leave the >>>>>> original this time too. >>>> >>>>> I used a neutral term in place of your hyperbole. >>>> >>>> There is no hyperbole in what I said, its fact. >>> >>> Your support for that claim is where? >> >> Don’t need any, you are free to >> research that if you don’t believe it. > > Your job to provide support for YOUR claims, sunshine. We all swooned when you did that with your original claim, shitshine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-20 19:51 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ruatoj$ffs$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73904 |
On 2021-01-20 7:15 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > > "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message > news:ruaqa5$u8l$2@dont-email.me... >> On 2021-01-20 6:41 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>> Trump's financial status is irrelevant to what collateral >>>>>>> there is for those particular loans due soon. And my >>>>>>> source for that is just as good as his, fuckwit. >>>>>> >>>>>> He doesn't need a source, sunshine. >>>>> >>>>> I don’t either, shitshine. >>>> >>>> Yeah... ...you do. >>>> >>>> Because you made a claim that I DON'T accept. >>> >>> You have always been, and always will be >>> completely and utterly irrelevant. What >>> you may or may not accept in spades. >>> >>> You are free to research that yourself if you don’t accept it. >>> >>> I don’t bother to save everything I read just in case >>> some pathological liar doesn’t accept it when I state it. >>> >>>>>> You accepted what he DID claim which was about loans coming due >>>>> >>>>> Nope, I knew that already, from months ago. >>>> >>>> Right. And them went on to claim that those loans had "fuck all >>>> collateral". >>> >>> Nope, state that. >>> >>>> That's a claim. >>> >>> Nope, a statement of fact. >>> >>>>>> and nothing about collateral at all. >>>>> >>>>> Pity about what I came across months ago. >>>> >>>> Which you won't present here for what reason? >>> >>> I don’t bother to save everything I read just in case >>> some pathological liar doesn’t accept it when I state it. >>> >>> You are free to research that if you don’t believe it. > >> Got it: > > Nope. > >> You have NOTHING. > > Neither do you on your original claim. I didn't make an original claim, sunshine. I asked you to support YOUR claim. And as always... ...you've got NOTHING. > >>>>> <reams of your shit any 3 year old could >>>>> leave for dead flushed where it belongs> >>>>> >>>>>>>> ...or are you going to claim I'm misquoting you about that? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You clearly did just that and were stupid enough to leave the >>>>>>> original this time too. >>>>> >>>>>> I used a neutral term in place of your hyperbole. >>>>> >>>>> There is no hyperbole in what I said, its fact. >>>> >>>> Your support for that claim is where? >>> >>> Don’t need any, you are free to >>> research that if you don’t believe it. >> >> Your job to provide support for YOUR claims, sunshine. > > We all swooned when you did that with your original claim, shitshine. Quote my "original claim".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 10:32 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6rsssFl7erU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73846 |
Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote > sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote: >> Chris wrote >>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Mayayana wrote >>>>> Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >>>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into the >>>>> white >>>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, that he >>>>> was >>>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>>> | >>>>> >>>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >>>>> just another dirty lie. >>>> >>>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted for >>>> him >>>> because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he wasn't a >>>> Democrat. I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger >>>> military, a pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already >>>> here, and the elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama >>>> introduced. >>>> Instead I got inane tweets. Still, he's not Hillary. >>> >>> Trump is a brand. He sold the brand to his voters and all they got were >>> slogans. His whole presidency was a grift to fill his pockets and >>> improve >>> his brand. Unfortunately for him, he didn't realise that it came with >>> responsibility and consequences. He's now seriously damaged (hopefully >>> fatally) his brand. No-one wants anything to do with him. He's also too >>> afraid to go back to NY and is going to hide in Florida. Although, who >>> knows how long for as his neighbours have already made it clear he's not >>> allowed to reside at Mar-a-lago. >> >> Amusingly, his efforts to sell his hotel in D.C. have been unsuccessful, >> not just because of the unrealistic price he's demanding, but also >> because a condition of the sale is to retain the Trump name on the >> property. Eventually he'll have to sell it at a much lower price than >> he's asking, and remove the condition that the buyer retain the Trump >> name, or the bank will foreclose. Or perhaps Sheldon Adelson will step >> in and bail him out and buy the property and keep the Trump name on the >> hotel, though that will negatively affect bookings. > He's going to have a really hard time trying to cash in > on his what should have been his Presidential "bonus". Bullshit when almost half of those who bothered to vote voted for him and are stupid enough to believe that Biden stole the election using voting fraud. > He's also got that huge loan with Deutsche > Bank which is due in a couple of years. And that bank gets to wear the fact that they have fuck all in the way of viable collateral for those loans. > He'll probably be able to con his > followers into giving him money. Corse he will and there are plenty of them too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-13 10:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rtncpj$eps$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73502 |
On 1/13/2021 8:37 AM, The Real Bev wrote: > On 01/13/2021 07:07 AM, Ken Blake wrote: >> On 1/12/2021 4:26 PM, The Real Bev wrote: >>> >>> I don't listen to news. Ever. Is it pronounced PAR-lerr or the French >>> way: par-LAY? >> >> I don't listen to news either and I know nothing about parler. But it >> took only a few seconds to find on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parler >> that it's pronounced PAR-ler. > > I heard it pronounced that way by some news commentator this morning. On > to the next first-world problem... > > I was going to join, but they wanted my cell number to send me a > confirmation code. No. Even so, it's just WRONG to shut them down. > Period. Give me a break. They were shut down for violating the terms of service of Apple, Google, and Amazon. These are private companies that are not under any obligation to provide a platform to anyone that wants one and that doesn't follow the terms of service that they agreed to. Republicans are always promoting the free market. If a bakery doesn't want to bake a cake for gay couple's wedding then the bakery doesn't have to. If a business is boycotted by people that don't like the politics of the owner--whether left or right, that's the free market. If advertisers refuse to advertise on Tucker Carlson's show, that's the free market. Deal with it. Parler is certainly free to self-host, or to find another host provider, and that's exactly what they are saying they will do. They can certainly find a host provider that doesn't have any restrictions on any speech. There are hosting services outside the U.S. that would be thrilled to provide hosting services for a social media company that allows posts that advocate violence, that encourage the overthrow of the United States Government, and that spread false information. Probably Trump has already asked Putin to help out with this. The much bigger issue is the mobile app. While Parler can certainly just do a web-based service, that will be much less popular than a mobile app. Android users could always side-load an app, but few will do that. It'd be really hard for iPhone and iPad users since they'd have to jailbreak to load an app not present on the Apple App store.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-13 13:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <130120211309574010%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #73515 |
In article <rtncpj$eps$1@dont-email.me>, sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote: > The much bigger issue is the mobile app. While Parler can certainly just > do a web-based service, that will be much less popular than a mobile > app. Android users could always side-load an app, but few will do that. > It'd be really hard for iPhone and iPad users since they'd have to > jailbreak to load an app not present on the Apple App store. no they don't. jailbreaking is not required to sideload on iphones. it's a little more effort than on android, but not impossible.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-13 10:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rtnfgu$3cp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73515 |
On 01/13/2021 10:05 AM, sms wrote:
> The much bigger issue is the mobile app. While Parler can certainly just
> do a web-based service, that will be much less popular than a mobile
> app. Android users could always side-load an app, but few will do that.
> It'd be really hard for iPhone and iPad users since they'd have to
> jailbreak to load an app not present on the Apple App store.
The problem in communication now is that it's ALL done by private
companies. At what point does freedom of speech become nonexistent not
by governmental action but by commercial entities?
--
Cheers, Bev
"Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority."
-- U.S. Supreme Court, McIntyre v Ohio Elections,1995
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-13 12:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rtnk66$6dc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73522 |
On 1/13/2021 10:52 AM, The Real Bev wrote: > On 01/13/2021 10:05 AM, sms wrote: > >> The much bigger issue is the mobile app. While Parler can certainly just >> do a web-based service, that will be much less popular than a mobile >> app. Android users could always side-load an app, but few will do that. >> It'd be really hard for iPhone and iPad users since they'd have to >> jailbreak to load an app not present on the Apple App store. > > The problem in communication now is that it's ALL done by private > companies. At what point does freedom of speech become nonexistent not > by governmental action but by commercial entities? Not "ALL" but mostly. When was it not done by private companies? Other than entities like Stars and Stripes and Voice of America, both of which have been attacked by right-wing Republicans recently, newspapers, radio, and TV stations have always been private entities. Trump tried to shut down Stars and Stripes and almost succeeded <https://www.stripes.com/news/us/pentagon-will-reverse-shutdown-order-for-stars-and-stripes-1.644638>. VOA has been under attack as well <https://www.voanews.com/usa/voa-director-reassigns-white-house-correspondent>. Anyone can start up a new media company to promote their agenda. Look at Fox, Washington Examiner, OAN, Gab, Parler, etc.. None of them are truthful, but no one stops them from saying whatever they want. It's more that they can't get advertisers because of their false rhetoric. Who would advertise on Parler or Tucker Carlson other than the My Pillow guy? Parler will be back, they just need to find a web hosting company that doesn't have terms of service that they are unwilling to abide by. And they'll have to rely on a web-based model since Apple and Google won't allow their app to be distributed on their app stores.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-13 15:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <130120211519079014%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #73531 |
In article <rtnk66$6dc$1@dont-email.me>, sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote: > > Parler will be back, no they won't. they're gone. > they just need to find a web hosting company that > doesn't have terms of service that they are unwilling to abide by. which is very unlikely. they also need to pay off their mountain of debts, including legal fees for their silly lawsuit against amazon and after they lose, almost certainly amazon's legal fees. > And > they'll have to rely on a web-based model since Apple and Google won't > allow their app to be distributed on their app stores. which will make it at best, a curiosity, assuming they can find hosting, which is not a given.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-13 14:46 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rtnt7p$5i8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73531 |
On 01/13/2021 12:11 PM, sms wrote:
> On 1/13/2021 10:52 AM, The Real Bev wrote:
>> On 01/13/2021 10:05 AM, sms wrote:
>>
>>> The much bigger issue is the mobile app. While Parler can certainly just
>>> do a web-based service, that will be much less popular than a mobile
>>> app. Android users could always side-load an app, but few will do that.
>>> It'd be really hard for iPhone and iPad users since they'd have to
>>> jailbreak to load an app not present on the Apple App store.
>>
>> The problem in communication now is that it's ALL done by private
>> companies. At what point does freedom of speech become nonexistent not
>> by governmental action but by commercial entities?
>
> Not "ALL" but mostly.
There's still usenet, but I wonder how long that could last under
concerted attack? My ISP dropped it because of expense and low usage.
--
Cheers, Bev
*Are you *sure* there's a hyphen in "anal-retentive?"*
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | AJL <noemail@none.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-13 16:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <rtnuse$jej$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73558 |
On 1/13/2021 3:46 PM, The Real Bev wrote: > There's still usenet, but I wonder how long that could last under > concerted attack? Probably more likely to just die out from us old posters dying out.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-13 15:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rto151$vas$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73560 |
On 01/13/2021 03:14 PM, AJL wrote: > On 1/13/2021 3:46 PM, The Real Bev wrote: > >> There's still usenet, but I wonder how long that could last under >> concerted attack? > > Probably more likely to just die out from us old posters dying out. "No point in surgery, it will just shrivel up, turn black and fall off by itself." -- Cheers, Bev Guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-13 16:55 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rto4qe$jnc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73558 |
On 1/13/2021 2:46 PM, The Real Bev wrote: <snip> > There's still usenet, but I wonder how long that could last under > concerted attack? My ISP dropped it because of expense and low usage. Very few ISPs still support it. There are tens of thousands of newsgroups, most of which have either been destroyed by trolls and spammers, or have been abandoned as irrelevant. Some Usenet groups have been removed in the past because they discussed subjects that were inappropriate, though not illegal. Let's hope that Trump doesn't discover Usenet.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-13 22:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <130120212219171553%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #73569 |
In article <rto4qe$jnc$1@dont-email.me>, sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote: > > > There's still usenet, but I wonder how long that could last under > > concerted attack? My ISP dropped it because of expense and low usage. > > Very few ISPs still support it. true, however, there are many third party usenet providers. > There are tens of thousands of > newsgroups, most of which have either been destroyed by trolls and > spammers, or have been abandoned as irrelevant. true for the discussion groups, but very much not true for the binary groups which is the bulk of usenet (and not just because binaries are bigger either). > Some Usenet groups have > been removed in the past because they discussed subjects that were > inappropriate, though not illegal. unlikely, but if that were to happen, the group would reappear under a different name or the discussion would move to another existing group.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-14 14:30 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i69s6hF55cgU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73569 |
sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote > The Real Bev wrote >> There's still usenet, but I wonder how long that could last under >> concerted attack? My ISP dropped it because of expense and low usage. > Very few ISPs still support it. They are irrelevant while news servers are still available. > There are tens of thousands of newsgroups, most > of which have either been destroyed by trolls and > spammers, or have been abandoned as irrelevant. Mostly just unused now. > Some Usenet groups have been removed in > the past because they discussed subjects that > were inappropriate, though not illegal. Very little of that happened. > Let's hope that Trump doesn't discover Usenet. Even if he did, few have even heard of it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | AJL <noemail@none.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-13 13:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <rtnmd3$m52$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73522 |
On 1/13/2021 11:52 AM, The Real Bev wrote: > The problem in communication now is that it's ALL done by private > companies. At what point does freedom of speech become nonexistent > not by governmental action but by commercial entities? You've never had legal freedom of speech protection when using a private entity. Only from (US) governments.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-13 13:33 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rtnp04$9qq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73539 |
On 1/13/2021 12:49 PM, AJL wrote: > On 1/13/2021 11:52 AM, The Real Bev wrote: > >> The problem in communication now is that it's ALL done by private >> companies. At what point does freedom of speech become nonexistent >> not by governmental action but by commercial entities? > > You've never had legal freedom of speech protection when using a private > entity. Only from (US) governments. Exactly. The government can't stop you from saying whatever you want, but private entities aren't required to provide a platform for you to say it. We used to have the Fairness Doctrine which guaranteed access to private media entities for different political viewpoints. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously in 1969 that the Fairness Doctrine was not only constitutional but essential to democracy. Republicans eliminated the Fairness Doctrine in 1987 when Reagan was president. Perhaps now they wish that they hadn't done that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-13 15:40 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rto0cp$qu2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73539 |
On 01/13/2021 12:49 PM, AJL wrote:
> On 1/13/2021 11:52 AM, The Real Bev wrote:
>
>> The problem in communication now is that it's ALL done by private
>> companies. At what point does freedom of speech become nonexistent
>> not by governmental action but by commercial entities?
>
> You've never had legal freedom of speech protection when using a private
> entity. Only from (US) governments.
I know. But it's only recently become a problem. Would anyone have
believed "cancel culture" was possible ten years ago?
--
Cheers, Bev
"Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the
American Public." -- H.L. Mencken
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-18 08:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ru4c6h$389$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73562 |
On 1/13/2021 3:40 PM, The Real Bev wrote: > On 01/13/2021 12:49 PM, AJL wrote: >> On 1/13/2021 11:52 AM, The Real Bev wrote: >> >>> The problem in communication now is that it's ALL done by private >>> companies. At what point does freedom of speech become nonexistent >>> not by governmental action but by commercial entities? >> >> You've never had legal freedom of speech protection when using a private >> entity. Only from (US) governments. > > I know. But it's only recently become a problem. Would anyone have > believed "cancel culture" was possible ten years ago? > When overthrow of out electoral system becomes the primary message, some companies have a problem with that. Some voters too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hergen Lehmann <hlehmann.expires.5-11@snafu.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-13 22:09 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <h444dh-lgjg1.ln1@hergen.spdns.de> |
| In reply to | #73522 |
Am 13.01.21 um 19:52 schrieb The Real Bev: > The problem in communication now is that it's ALL done by private > companies. You can still gather like-minded people around you and communicate with them directly (or protest along them), as it was the case back when the "freedom of speech" concept was conceived. > At what point does freedom of speech become nonexistent not > by governmental action but by commercial entities? That's already the case. Say something considered "inappropriate" by the advertisement companies (or accidentally use some snippet which triggers the copyright enforcement filters) and you will be censored immediately. Sometimes, a single controversial word is enough. Repeat this on a regular basis, and all of those fancy "social media" companies will ban you. If you intend to rely on some commercial company to express your thoughts, you're lost.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 15 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15] 16 17 … 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web