Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #155101 > unrolled thread
| Started by | bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-08-19 16:41 -0400 |
| Last post | 2026-08-21 21:53 -0400 |
| Articles | 10 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
ring-me feature? bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2026-08-19 16:41 -0400
Re: ring-me feature? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-08-19 20:29 -0500
Re: ring-me feature? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2026-08-21 15:24 -0700
Re: ring-me feature? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-08-21 21:03 -0500
Re: ring-me feature? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2026-08-21 19:21 -0700
Re: ring-me feature? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-08-22 00:42 -0500
Re: ring-me feature? Allodoxaphobia <trepidation@example.net> - 2026-08-20 15:46 +0000
Re: ring-me feature? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-08-21 12:01 -0400
Re: ring-me feature? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2026-08-21 15:21 -0700
Re: ring-me feature? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-08-21 21:53 -0400
| From | bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 16:41 -0400 |
| Subject | ring-me feature? |
| Message-ID | <4fWcnXw5r-6piBv3nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Is there a feature that produces a simulated call on demand for learning and trouble-shooting purposes? I'm thinking of the equivalent of asking someone else to call me. If the feature exists then it should ring on demand and be terminated after some blurb lasting x seconds when 'answered'.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 20:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <t6e5l6v6wnq6$.dlg@v.nguard.lh> |
| In reply to | #155101 |
bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> wrote: > Is there a feature that produces a simulated call on demand for learning > and trouble-shooting purposes? I'm thinking of the equivalent of asking > someone else to call me. If the feature exists then it should ring on > demand and be terminated after some blurb lasting x seconds when 'answered'. You don't have a secondary phone number (i.e., more than just your one mobile phone)? If in the USA, you could get a Google Voice account, and use it to dial out to your mobile phone. You didn't mention cost, or free only. https://abhandshake.com/test-call-generator/ They don't mention pricing, so it's probably very expensive, and geared toward commercial use. https://www.labnol.org/internet/schedule-phone-call/30453 That uses app automation to generate a simulated call. Not sure if that is useful to you since I don't know what you trying to test on your phone.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-21 15:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <116aj7e$ladq$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #155116 |
On 8/19/26 18:29, VanguardLH wrote:
> bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> wrote:
>
>> Is there a feature that produces a simulated call on demand for learning
>> and trouble-shooting purposes? I'm thinking of the equivalent of asking
>> someone else to call me. If the feature exists then it should ring on
>> demand and be terminated after some blurb lasting x seconds when 'answered'.
>
> You don't have a secondary phone number (i.e., more than just your one
> mobile phone)?
>
> If in the USA, you could get a Google Voice account, and use it to dial
> out to your mobile phone.
I assume you mean from your computer to your cell phone. I need to get
a decent (more than $2.00 at Temu) headset so I can do that. One of
these days.
> You didn't mention cost, or free only.
>
> https://abhandshake.com/test-call-generator/
> They don't mention pricing, so it's probably very expensive, and geared
> toward commercial use.
>
> https://www.labnol.org/internet/schedule-phone-call/30453
> That uses app automation to generate a simulated call. Not sure if that
> is useful to you since I don't know what you trying to test on your
> phone.
--
Cheers, Bev
"No matter how cynical I get, it's just never enough to keep up."
--Lily Tomlin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-21 21:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1p6cy2unvdhcz$.dlg@v.nguard.lh> |
| In reply to | #155178 |
The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: > VanguardLH wrote: > >> bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> wrote: >> >>> Is there a feature that produces a simulated call on demand for learning >>> and trouble-shooting purposes? ... >> >> If in the USA, you could get a Google Voice account, and use it to dial >> out to your mobile phone. > > I assume you mean from your computer to your cell phone. I need to > get a decent (more than $2.00 at Temu) headset so I can do that. One > of these days. The OP only mentioned ringing his cell phone, not conducting a voice call. Web-based calling will ring his phone.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-21 19:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <116b139$ohcf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #155181 |
On 8/21/26 19:03, VanguardLH wrote: > The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: > >> VanguardLH wrote: >> >>> bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Is there a feature that produces a simulated call on demand for learning >>>> and trouble-shooting purposes? ... >>> >>> If in the USA, you could get a Google Voice account, and use it to dial >>> out to your mobile phone. >> >> I assume you mean from your computer to your cell phone. I need to >> get a decent (more than $2.00 at Temu) headset so I can do that. One >> of these days. > > The OP only mentioned ringing his cell phone, not conducting a voice > call. Web-based calling will ring his phone. Same thing. I don't think you can make a google voice call to the cell phone that you're google-voice calling from. -- Cheers, Bev Little Mary took her skis upon the snow to frisk. Wasn't she a silly girl her little * ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-22 00:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1cl41tbw792fj$.dlg@v.nguard.lh> |
| In reply to | #155182 |
The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8/21/26 19:03, VanguardLH wrote: >> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> VanguardLH wrote: >>> >>>> bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is there a feature that produces a simulated call on demand for learning >>>>> and trouble-shooting purposes? ... >>>> >>>> If in the USA, you could get a Google Voice account, and use it to dial >>>> out to your mobile phone. >>> >>> I assume you mean from your computer to your cell phone. I need to >>> get a decent (more than $2.00 at Temu) headset so I can do that. One >>> of these days. >> >> The OP only mentioned ringing his cell phone, not conducting a voice >> call. Web-based calling will ring his phone. > > Same thing. I don't think you can make a google voice call to the cell > phone that you're google-voice calling from. Don't link your cell phone to your GV account.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Allodoxaphobia <trepidation@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-20 15:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <neolquF98pvU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #155101 |
On Wed, 19 Aug 2026 16:41:59 -0400, bad sector wrote: > > Is there a feature that produces a simulated call on demand for > learning and trouble-shooting purposes? I'm thinking of the equivalent > of asking someone else to call me. If the feature exists then it > should ring on demand and be terminated after some blurb lasting x > seconds when 'answered'. In the old POTS days, the local exchange would have a call-me-back number you could dial, hang up, and receive a call back to verify the line was working both ways and that the ringer worked. circa the 1960's and probably even much earlier.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-21 12:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mctg8ld242iqamhrbim0ascvagn8doakse@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #155136 |
In comp.mobile.android, on 20 Aug 2026 15:46:38 GMT, Allodoxaphobia <trepidation@example.net> wrote: >On Wed, 19 Aug 2026 16:41:59 -0400, bad sector wrote: >> >> Is there a feature that produces a simulated call on demand for >> learning and trouble-shooting purposes? I'm thinking of the equivalent >> of asking someone else to call me. If the feature exists then it >> should ring on demand and be terminated after some blurb lasting x >> seconds when 'answered'. > >In the old POTS days, the local exchange would have a call-me-back >number you could dial, hang up, and receive a call back to verify >the line was working both ways and that the ringer worked. > >circa the 1960's and probably even much earlier. Yes, in 1966 in Chicago it was 1197. Late they changed it to 1191. I don't think they publicized it, however. I saw the phone man use it and I think I asked him what the number was. Sad to say, I forget the number in NYC in the 70's. Later, none of the three worked in NY.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-21 15:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <116aj0t$ladq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #155136 |
On 8/20/26 08:46, Allodoxaphobia wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2026 16:41:59 -0400, bad sector wrote:
>>
>> Is there a feature that produces a simulated call on demand for
>> learning and trouble-shooting purposes? I'm thinking of the equivalent
>> of asking someone else to call me. If the feature exists then it
>> should ring on demand and be terminated after some blurb lasting x
>> seconds when 'answered'.
>
> In the old POTS days, the local exchange would have a call-me-back
> number you could dial, hang up, and receive a call back to verify
> the line was working both ways and that the ringer worked.
It was also good for convincing someone that you had to leave
immediately to deal with something urgent. That's what my friends and I
used it for with our parents.
> circa the 1960's and probably even much earlier.
Definitely the 50s. Number wasn't publicized, you had to know somebody
who knew it.
--
Cheers, Bev
"No matter how cynical I get, it's just never enough to keep up."
--Lily Tomlin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-21 21:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <u70i8lp8dd87ure164h0doc5nvdid9mk41@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #155177 |
In comp.mobile.android, on Fri, 21 Aug 2026 15:21:16 -0700, The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >On 8/20/26 08:46, Allodoxaphobia wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Aug 2026 16:41:59 -0400, bad sector wrote: >>> >>> Is there a feature that produces a simulated call on demand for >>> learning and trouble-shooting purposes? I'm thinking of the equivalent >>> of asking someone else to call me. If the feature exists then it >>> should ring on demand and be terminated after some blurb lasting x >>> seconds when 'answered'. >> >> In the old POTS days, the local exchange would have a call-me-back >> number you could dial, hang up, and receive a call back to verify >> the line was working both ways and that the ringer worked. > >It was also good for convincing someone that you had to leave >immediately to deal with something urgent. That's what my friends and I >used it for with our parents. >> circa the 1960's and probably even much earlier. > >Definitely the 50s. Number wasn't publicized, you had to know somebody >who knew it. Maybe there is a number like that now. If we only knew someone.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web