Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #154741 > unrolled thread
| Started by | micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-08-06 21:29 -0400 |
| Last post | 2026-08-11 21:02 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 180 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-08-06 21:29 -0400
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-08-07 09:15 -0400
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-08-07 16:42 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-07 15:50 +0100
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2026-08-07 17:30 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2026-08-07 17:30 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2026-08-07 17:27 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-08-07 22:09 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-08-10 02:28 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-08-10 17:41 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-10 09:24 -0800
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-11 10:38 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-11 02:01 -0800
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-11 12:32 +0100
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-11 08:19 -0800
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-14 19:20 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-15 10:24 +0100
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-15 12:08 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-15 11:51 +0100
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-15 13:40 +0100
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-08-11 13:28 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-08-11 13:27 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-11 12:39 +0100
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2026-08-15 10:38 -0700
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-08-11 13:58 +0000
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-08-11 14:12 +0000
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-08-12 20:36 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-08-12 20:40 +0000
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-11 08:19 -0800
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-11 08:52 -0800
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-08-12 20:44 +0200
Storage media availability over time (was: Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others?) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-16 09:20 +0100
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-16 10:01 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-08-18 14:00 +0200
Re: Storage media availability over time "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-18 15:22 +0200
Re: Storage media availability over time Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-08-18 15:44 +0000
Re: Storage media availability over time Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-18 19:22 +0100
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-18 18:15 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-19 07:58 +0100
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-18 23:15 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-08-19 15:36 +0000
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-19 08:23 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-08-19 16:59 +0000
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-19 10:04 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-19 20:15 +0200
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-19 10:19 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-19 20:29 +0200
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-19 11:57 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-19 22:13 +0200
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-19 12:50 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-08-20 00:21 +0000
Re: Storage media availability over time Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-08-20 23:08 +0200
Re: Storage media availability over time "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-19 19:11 +0200
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-19 09:44 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-19 19:56 +0200
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-19 10:11 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-19 20:17 +0200
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-19 10:24 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-19 20:35 +0200
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-19 12:04 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-19 22:15 +0200
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-19 13:02 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-08-20 17:26 +0000
Re: Storage media availability over time Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-08-19 17:33 +0000
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-19 09:51 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-08-19 18:48 +0000
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-19 12:13 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-08-19 20:25 +0000
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-19 12:55 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-20 01:16 +0200
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-19 20:32 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-08-20 00:08 +0000
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-19 20:36 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-08-20 06:03 +0000
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-19 22:19 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-08-20 12:45 +0000
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-20 06:22 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-08-20 15:22 +0000
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-20 08:48 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-08-20 18:18 +0000
Re: Storage media availability over time [Android Newsreader] Dave Royal <dave@dave123royal.com> - 2026-08-20 19:48 +0100
Re: Storage media availability over time [Android Newsreader] AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-08-20 21:07 +0000
Re: Storage media availability over time Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-08-20 14:35 +0000
Re: Storage media availability over time AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-08-20 15:36 +0000
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-20 08:53 -0800
Re: Storage media availability over time Old Macdonald <eieio@patch.corn> - 2026-08-19 17:37 -0700
Re: Storage media availability over time Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-08-20 14:39 +0000
Re: Storage media availability over time knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-19 18:17 -0400
Re: Storage media availability over time AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-08-19 23:45 +0000
Re: Storage media availability over time Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-08-20 23:06 +0200
Re: Storage media availability over time Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-08-20 23:04 +0200
Re: Storage media availability over time Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com> - 2026-08-20 21:09 +0000
Re: Storage media availability over time Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-08-20 23:01 +0200
Re: Storage media availability over time Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-08-18 13:29 +0200
Re: Storage media availability over time Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-18 08:47 -0800
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-14 19:28 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-15 10:22 +0100
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-15 08:50 -0800
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-08-10 02:27 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-10 08:34 -0800
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-08-10 13:02 -0400
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-08-11 06:20 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-08-11 14:37 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-08-11 10:21 -0400
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-11 08:18 -0800
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-08-12 06:00 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-11 20:47 -0800
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-08-12 17:03 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-08-12 20:41 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-08-13 18:59 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-08-15 07:56 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-15 11:00 +0100
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-15 08:34 -0800
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-15 12:10 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-08-15 19:33 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-08-16 06:23 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-08-17 18:18 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-08-17 17:41 +0000
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-08-18 05:24 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-08-18 10:19 +0000
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-08-14 00:21 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-14 20:23 -0800
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-08-14 00:20 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-14 19:37 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-08-15 19:34 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-08-15 20:09 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-08-10 17:38 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-08-10 11:49 -0400
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2026-08-10 18:04 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-08-11 06:33 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-08-11 05:54 +0000
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2026-08-11 10:10 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-08-11 10:18 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-15 10:30 +0100
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-08-15 15:19 +0000
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2026-08-11 10:01 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-08-11 10:11 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-11 10:34 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Siard <saylor259@mailbox.org> - 2026-08-07 16:57 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-08-10 02:32 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Siard <saylor259@mailbox.org> - 2026-08-10 09:25 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-10 08:47 +0100
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-10 09:40 -0800
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-07 19:15 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2026-08-07 22:34 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-10 08:28 -0800
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-11 10:42 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-10 17:40 +0100
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-10 09:28 -0800
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-08 11:43 +0100
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-08-08 20:57 -0400
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-08-09 14:33 +0000
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-08-09 14:28 -0400
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-10 08:32 -0800
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-08-09 18:34 -0400
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-08-10 02:20 -0400
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-10 07:31 +0100
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Dave Royal <dave@dave123royal.com> - 2026-08-10 08:59 +0100
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Philippe <p.naudin+nntp@free.fr> - 2026-08-10 11:06 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-10 10:33 +0100
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Dave Royal <dave@dave123royal.com> - 2026-08-10 10:51 +0100
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-08-10 10:25 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-10 09:43 +0100
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-08-10 10:34 -0400
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-11 10:24 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-08-10 09:42 -0400
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-09 09:49 +0100
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-09 15:21 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-08-09 14:21 -0400
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-09 22:31 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-08-09 19:33 -0400
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-10 02:48 +0200
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-08-10 02:25 -0400
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-08-09 14:43 +0000
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-08-10 13:21 -0400
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-08-10 18:01 +0000
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-08-10 14:55 -0400
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-08-10 19:19 +0000
[OT] non-Unix fingers (was: Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others?) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-11 01:00 +0100
Re: SD card vs. Esim? Samsung vs. others? Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2026-08-11 21:02 +0100
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | AJL <noemail@none.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 15:36 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Storage media availability over time |
| Message-ID | <1164iir$2ovg0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #155073 |
On 8/19/26 12:15 AM, Maria Sophia wrote: >Google, for example, just like Apple, does not provide the sd card because I haven't used my card slot in many years. When my 7 year old phone finally does go bad my reasons for a choice of a new one won't depend on a card slot. In fact I'll probably look for one that doesn't have one. Just an extra hole to get dirt in. I have 100GB available online for the data I need so I'll likely not use all that much internal storage either. I suspect most of the buying public is like me and are quite happy with no slot. And Google and the competition are likely just giving the general market what it wants. >they make far more billions by having you buy back the functionality. My online 100GB Google storage costs me less than $2 a month (US) so they won't be making all that much $$ back from me. YMMV...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 08:23 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Storage media availability over time |
| Message-ID | <1164l9c$2el3$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #155074 |
AJL wrote: >>Google, for example, just like Apple, does not provide the sd card because > > I haven't used my card slot in many years. When my 7 year old phone finally > does go bad my reasons for a choice of a new one won't depend on a card > slot. In fact I'll probably look for one that doesn't have one. Just an > extra hole to get dirt in. I have 100GB available online for the data I > need so I'll likely not use all that much internal storage either. I > suspect most of the buying public is like me and are quite happy with no > slot. And Google and the competition are likely just giving the general > market what it wants. > >>they make far more billions by having you buy back the functionality. > > My online 100GB Google storage costs me less than $2 a month (US) so they > won't be making all that much $$ back from me. YMMV... Hi AJL, Yes. I understand you. Both of us have had this conversation in the past, where the good news is neither of us is changing our stripes. We're consistent. :) Over a 50 year storage life, 2 bucks a month is only $1K totally wasted. For the USA, where wealth predominates over efficiency, that's nothing. As for "most of the buying public is like you", I can't say that, but if we look at the fact that 60% of the phones today have the slot, I think not. I think what's the case is in the USA, where wealth and Internet is endemic, it's no big deal to waste money on internal & cloud storage costs. But I think in most of the world, where the ability to waste money on frivolous things like cloud storage & constant Internet is less than here. Otherwise, why are most of the phones of today coming with sd card slots? Personally, I think the real answer is that wasting money is an American thing, where most of the world doesn't want to waste money for no reason. Add to that the "style" issue where it seems the higher the cost of the phone, the less chance it has of having sd slot hardware, which, if that is true, then that alone is strong evidence that wasting money is a style thing more so than an economic thing. It's like having a gas guzzling car like a Ferrari. It's more of a style thing saying "I can waste money all I want". Which, after all, is fundamentally your basic argument, is it not? You can easily afford to waste money. That comes out in all your posts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | AJL <noemail@none.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 16:59 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Storage media availability over time |
| Message-ID | <1164ndj$2qp3e$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #155075 |
On 8/19/26 9:23 AM, Maria Sophia wrote: >Over a 50 year storage life, 2 bucks a month [for AJL's Google 100GB online storage] is only $1K totally wasted. >For the USA, where wealth predominates over efficiency, that's nothing. In 50 years I'll be 135 years old so I'll probably not spend quite that much. And if you actually worry about a few cents (US) a day you really need a better retirement income... >It's like having a gas guzzling car like a Ferrari. >It's more of a style thing saying "I can waste money all I want". I'll be happy to waste a few cents a day on a Ferrari. Just tell me where... >Which, after all, is fundamentally your basic argument, is it not? >You can easily afford to waste money. That comes out in all your posts. That's true. I do enjoy my toy's. I'm down to 2 tablets and this Chromebook now so time for a new gadget. Maybe back to Windows again? Time will tell. Amazon recently broke my heart with its latest update by breaking my side-loaded Google apps on my Fire tablets so they've now gone to the great-grandkids. Lose-win?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 10:04 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Storage media availability over time |
| Message-ID | <1164r6p$20st$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #155077 |
AJL wrote: >>Over a 50 year storage life, 2 bucks a month [for AJL's Google 100GB online storage] is only $1K totally wasted. >>For the USA, where wealth predominates over efficiency, that's nothing. > > In 50 years I'll be 135 years old so I'll probably not spend quite that > much. And if you actually worry about a few cents (US) a day you really > need a better retirement income... Hi AJL, My entire point is simply logic. There's a reason that most phones today have the sd slot, and, there's a reason that people w/o it pay through the nose to replace the feature. It's basic MARKETING 101 that we all learned in the 1970s. >>It's like having a gas guzzling car like a Ferrari. >>It's more of a style thing saying "I can waste money all I want". > > I'll be happy to waste a few cents a day on a Ferrari. Just tell me where... It's OK that people waste money on a Ferrari. As long as they don't claim it's cheaper than a Honda. It's OK when people waste their money. As long as they realize they're paying thru the nose for that Ferrari. Likewise, it's OK that you waste your money, AJL. As long as you realize that you are paying thru the nose for storage. You've told us many times that you were so desperate to replace the missing functionality that you pay every single day of your life to get it back. That's fine. All I ask you to do is compare the price of three basic things: 128GB or 256GB of internal storage = ? for the life of the phone 128GB or 256GB of cloud storage = ? for the life of the phone 128GB or 256GB of sd storage = ? for the life of the phone >>Which, after all, is fundamentally your basic argument, is it not? >>You can easily afford to waste money. That comes out in all your posts. > > That's true. I do enjoy my toy's. I'm down to 2 tablets and this Chromebook > now so time for a new gadget. Maybe back to Windows again? Time will tell. > Amazon recently broke my heart with its latest update by breaking my > side-loaded Google apps on my Fire tablets so they've now gone to the > great-grandkids. Lose-win? Like you, I have more devices than I can count, some of which are that festugenah Apple iOS stuff, which, if you want to waste money, Apple products are designed to force you to pay for what they didn't give you. Interestingly, my wife just donated her pink tenth-generation iPad to a great grandkid, so we're in the same boat that our babies' babies are getting our stuff. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 20:15 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Storage media availability over time |
| Message-ID | <nema59Fr40fU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #155084 |
On 2026-08-19 20:04, Maria Sophia wrote:
> AJL wrote:
>>> Over a 50 year storage life, 2 bucks a month [for AJL's Google 100GB online storage] is only $1K totally wasted.
>>> For the USA, where wealth predominates over efficiency, that's nothing.
>>
>> In 50 years I'll be 135 years old so I'll probably not spend quite that
>> much. And if you actually worry about a few cents (US) a day you really
>> need a better retirement income...
>
> Hi AJL,
>
> My entire point is simply logic.
>
> There's a reason that most phones today have the sd slot, and, there's a
> reason that people w/o it pay through the nose to replace the feature.
>
Flawed logic: we don't pay through the nose.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 10:19 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Storage media availability over time |
| Message-ID | <1164s3a$2aaq$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #155086 |
Carlos E. R. wrote: >> There's a reason that most phones today have the sd slot, and, there's a >> reason that people w/o it pay through the nose to replace the feature. >> > > Flawed logic: we don't pay through the nose. There's a reason I helpfully suggested you invest in a Logic class. What's the difference in two phones, all else equal, but one has 128GB of internal storage, while the other has 256GB of internal storage, Carlos? Same question for cloud storage. Same question for sd card storage.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 20:29 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Storage media availability over time |
| Message-ID | <nemavtFr40fU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #155088 |
On 2026-08-19 20:19, Maria Sophia wrote:
> Carlos E. R. wrote:
>>> There's a reason that most phones today have the sd slot, and, there's a
>>> reason that people w/o it pay through the nose to replace the feature.
>>>
>>
>> Flawed logic: we don't pay through the nose.
>
> There's a reason I helpfully suggested you invest in a Logic class.
You are making assumptions based on your opinions, and then draw
concussions. Thus, failed logic.
>
> What's the difference in two phones, all else equal, but one has 128GB of
> internal storage, while the other has 256GB of internal storage, Carlos?
That's not the only difference. It also has more RAM. Plus, internal
"disk" is faster and more reliable than any external memory.
A lot of the space I need is for whatsapp, and whatsapp can not be told
to use the external card. So, the card id not useful to me.
The external card slot comes in the same position as the 2nd SIM. I need
the 2nd SIM, thus I can not use the external card.
>
> Same question for cloud storage.
> Same question for sd card storage.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 11:57 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Storage media availability over time |
| Message-ID | <11651q7$2ffk$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #155090 |
Carlos E. R. wrote: >> There's a reason I helpfully suggested you invest in a Logic class. > > You are making assumptions based on your opinions, and then draw > concussions. Thus, failed logic. > >> >> What's the difference in two phones, all else equal, but one has 128GB of >> internal storage, while the other has 256GB of internal storage, Carlos? > > That's not the only difference. It also has more RAM. Plus, internal > "disk" is faster and more reliable than any external memory. > > A lot of the space I need is for whatsapp, and whatsapp can not be told > to use the external card. So, the card id not useful to me. > > The external card slot comes in the same position as the 2nd SIM. I need > the 2nd SIM, thus I can not use the external card. > >> >> Same question for cloud storage. >> Same question for sd card storage. Hi Carlos, You'll never find me ever stating a claim that isn't logically sound. Yet again I must ask you to invest in a basic fundamental logic class. My assumptions are based on facts. Your claim that 60% of Android phones having sd slots is an opinion is patently absurd because we proved in this thread that is a fact. Just because you might not *like* that fact, doesn't make fact an opinion. Likewise, just because I said two otherwise equal phones doesn't mean you can add RAM differences because the point was to compare only the storage. What's the cost difference between phones which are equal in all but storage where one has 64GB of storage (like mine, which is perfectly usable) and another has 128GB of storage and another 256GB of storage. You do not need to answer that question, Carlos. We know the answer. Since I *did* take a class in LOGIC, I already know the answer. It's absurd for you to claim that the difference in cost isn't appreciable. Now, you *can* claim that the difference in storage is a. Faster b. More reliable c. Doesn't use a second slot etc. Never for a moment ever think I'm not eminently logical in all respects. Both internal storage and cloud storage are *different* than sd storage. But they're both *more expensive* than sd storage, which is my main point. They're all different. But in terms of expense, the logic is very clear.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 22:13 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Storage media availability over time |
| Message-ID | <nemh40Fr40hU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #155095 |
On 2026-08-19 21:57, Maria Sophia wrote:
> Carlos E. R. wrote:
>>> There's a reason I helpfully suggested you invest in a Logic class.
>>
>> You are making assumptions based on your opinions, and then draw
>> concussions. Thus, failed logic.
>>
>>>
>>> What's the difference in two phones, all else equal, but one has 128GB of
>>> internal storage, while the other has 256GB of internal storage, Carlos?
>>
>> That's not the only difference. It also has more RAM. Plus, internal
>> "disk" is faster and more reliable than any external memory.
>>
>> A lot of the space I need is for whatsapp, and whatsapp can not be told
>> to use the external card. So, the card id not useful to me.
>>
>> The external card slot comes in the same position as the 2nd SIM. I need
>> the 2nd SIM, thus I can not use the external card.
>>
>>>
>>> Same question for cloud storage.
>>> Same question for sd card storage.
>
> Hi Carlos,
>
> You'll never find me ever stating a claim that isn't logically sound.
>
> Yet again I must ask you to invest in a basic fundamental logic class.
> My assumptions are based on facts.
>
> Your claim that 60% of Android phones having sd slots is an opinion is
> patently absurd because we proved in this thread that is a fact.
I did not say this.
> Just because you might not *like* that fact, doesn't make fact an opinion.
>
> Likewise, just because I said two otherwise equal phones doesn't mean you
> can add RAM differences because the point was to compare only the storage.
Moot point. I can not compare what does not exist.
I did not have to compare two equal phones except for the storage size.
I compared two phones with different storage and different ram size.
That is a fact, by the way.
If I ever have to choose between two identical phones except for the
storage size, then I will tell you what I chose.
>
> What's the cost difference between phones which are equal in all but
> storage where one has 64GB of storage (like mine, which is perfectly
> usable) and another has 128GB of storage and another 256GB of storage.
>
> You do not need to answer that question, Carlos. We know the answer.
> Since I *did* take a class in LOGIC, I already know the answer.
No, I do not know the answer. And has nothing to do with logic classes.
>
> It's absurd for you to claim that the difference in cost isn't appreciable.
>
> Now, you *can* claim that the difference in storage is
> a. Faster
> b. More reliable
> c. Doesn't use a second slot
> etc.
>
> Never for a moment ever think I'm not eminently logical in all respects.
> Both internal storage and cloud storage are *different* than sd storage.
>
> But they're both *more expensive* than sd storage, which is my main point.
> They're all different. But in terms of expense, the logic is very clear.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 12:50 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Storage media availability over time |
| Message-ID | <11654tr$2g3g$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #155098 |
Carlos E. R. wrote: > If I ever have to choose between two identical phones except for the > storage size, then I will tell you what I chose. Fair enough... Let's move on Carlos, since I can solve problems that none of you can solve such as this archival solution I'm working on at this very moment. The chance of you solving this backup/restore problem is likely nearly zero, while the chance of me solving it is nearly 100% and yet, nobody has ever solved it (to my knowledge), so it's best I invest my time on this. Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android,alt.comp.microsoft.windows,alt.comp.os.windows-10 Subject: PSA: How to archive your EXACT homescreen(s) apps to Windows for perfect cross-platform backup/restore sans the net Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 09:57:21 -0800 Message-ID: <115nktv$15du$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> If you know of any program which does what I'm solving, let me know: 1. On Android, we create an SQL backup of the homescreen(s) 2. On the desktop, we reproduce the folder/APK hierarchy The result will be organized like this for every folder & every package. Homescreen #1, Folder #1, App #1 Package (xyz.package.com) Let's move our energies into solving *that* venerable problem!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | AJL <noemail@none.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-20 00:21 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Storage media availability over time |
| Message-ID | <1165hb1$33e8h$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #155084 |
On 8/19/26 11:04 AM, Maria Sophia wrote: >All I ask you to do is compare the price of three basic things: > 128GB or 256GB of internal storage = ? for the life of the phone > 128GB or 256GB of cloud storage = ? for the life of the phone > 128GB or 256GB of sd storage = ? for the life of the phone That argument doesn't work for me since I use my cloud storage on all my devices, not just my phone...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-20 23:08 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Storage media availability over time |
| Message-ID | <1167qbu$3qpql$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #155084 |
Maria Sophia, 2026-08-19 20:04: [...]> All I ask you to do is compare the price of three basic things: > 128GB or 256GB of internal storage = ? for the life of the phone > 128GB or 256GB of cloud storage = ? for the life of the phone > 128GB or 256GB of sd storage = ? for the life of the phone I had to replace around 10 SD cards over the last 5-10 years because they just failed. I had to replace NO phone because the internal memory failed So for me the choice is clear - no SD card at all in the phone. I don't want to deal with SD card failures. -- Arno Welzel https://arnowelzel.de
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 19:11 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Storage media availability over time |
| Message-ID | <nem6e2Fr40fU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #155075 |
On 2026-08-19 18:23, Maria Sophia wrote:
> AJL wrote:
>>> Google, for example, just like Apple, does not provide the sd card because
>>
>> I haven't used my card slot in many years. When my 7 year old phone finally
>> does go bad my reasons for a choice of a new one won't depend on a card
>> slot. In fact I'll probably look for one that doesn't have one. Just an
>> extra hole to get dirt in. I have 100GB available online for the data I
>> need so I'll likely not use all that much internal storage either. I
>> suspect most of the buying public is like me and are quite happy with no
>> slot. And Google and the competition are likely just giving the general
>> market what it wants.
>>
>>> they make far more billions by having you buy back the functionality.
>>
>> My online 100GB Google storage costs me less than $2 a month (US) so they
>> won't be making all that much $$ back from me. YMMV...
>
> Hi AJL,
>
> Yes. I understand you. Both of us have had this conversation in the past,
> where the good news is neither of us is changing our stripes.
>
> We're consistent. :)
>
> Over a 50 year storage life, 2 bucks a month is only $1K totally wasted.
> For the USA, where wealth predominates over efficiency, that's nothing.
>
> As for "most of the buying public is like you", I can't say that, but if we
> look at the fact that 60% of the phones today have the slot, I think not.
You insist in ignoring that several people here have told you that they
have the slot, and they have not used it in years.
...
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 09:44 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Storage media availability over time |
| Message-ID | <1164q20$1e67$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #155078 |
Carlos E. R. wrote: >> As for "most of the buying public is like you", I can't say that, but if we >> look at the fact that 60% of the phones today have the slot, I think not. > > You insist in ignoring that several people here have told you that they > have the slot, and they have not used it in years. Hi Carlos, I like you. But... When you make absurd statements like that, you begin to worry me. A lot... My suggestion is you take a class in basic logic the first chance you get. Your argument that if 3 people in the entire world say "they" never used the slot, then, to you, for some absurd reason, that means NOBODY uses it. Did you notice that most (if not all) those who said they didn't use the slot also paid through the nose already to replace what the slot provides? No? Of course not. Please, if you propose an argument to me, make that argument *not* absurd. OK? The mere fact that over 60% of today's Android phones have the slot is a meaningful statistic as is the fact those who don't use it pay for storage.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 19:56 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Storage media availability over time |
| Message-ID | <nem926Fr40fU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #155080 |
On 2026-08-19 19:44, Maria Sophia wrote:
> Carlos E. R. wrote:
>>> As for "most of the buying public is like you", I can't say that, but if we
>>> look at the fact that 60% of the phones today have the slot, I think not.
>>
>> You insist in ignoring that several people here have told you that they
>> have the slot, and they have not used it in years.
>
> Hi Carlos,
>
> I like you.
> But...
>
> When you make absurd statements like that, you begin to worry me.
> A lot...
>
Frsss
> My suggestion is you take a class in basic logic the first chance you get.
>
> Your argument that if 3 people in the entire world say "they" never used
> the slot, then, to you, for some absurd reason, that means NOBODY uses it.
>
> Did you notice that most (if not all) those who said they didn't use the
> slot also paid through the nose already to replace what the slot provides?
>
Nope.
> No?
> Of course not.
>
> Please, if you propose an argument to me, make that argument *not* absurd.
> OK?
>
> The mere fact that over 60% of today's Android phones have the slot is a
> meaningful statistic as is the fact those who don't use it pay for storage.
You are being ridiculous.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 10:11 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Storage media availability over time |
| Message-ID | <1164rkd$i8b$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #155083 |
Carlos E. R. wrote: >> The mere fact that over 60% of today's Android phones have the slot is a >> meaningful statistic as is the fact those who don't use it pay for storage. > > You are being ridiculous. Hi Carlos, Logic: a. If most phones have it b. Then it's there for a reason How is pointing out that 60% of all current/recent Android phones have sd slots being ridiculous? They put those slots in phones for a reason. My observation for the group is eminently logical and quite reasonable. 128GB or 256GB of internal storage = ? for the life of the phone 128GB or 256GB of cloud storage = ? for the life of the phone 128GB or 256GB of sd storage = ? for the life of the phone Assume 7 years. And no, you can't say the internal storage is free because it's not. If you can make a logical argument, then let's hear your logic. And no, people who claim to not be using sd who *also* paid through the nose for more storage via internal/cloud methods, does not count. It's absurd, in fact, for someone to pay through the nose to replace the missing storage of sd cards, and then "claim" they don't need storage. Logic: a. If they paid for it b. Then they needed it
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 20:17 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Storage media availability over time |
| Message-ID | <nemaa7Fr40fU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #155085 |
On 2026-08-19 20:11, Maria Sophia wrote:
> Carlos E. R. wrote:
>>> The mere fact that over 60% of today's Android phones have the slot is a
>>> meaningful statistic as is the fact those who don't use it pay for storage.
>>
>> You are being ridiculous.
>
> Hi Carlos,
>
> Logic:
> a. If most phones have it
> b. Then it's there for a reason
>
> How is pointing out that 60% of all current/recent Android phones have sd
> slots being ridiculous? They put those slots in phones for a reason.
>
Nobody says it is ridiculous.
> My observation for the group is eminently logical and quite reasonable.
>
> 128GB or 256GB of internal storage = ? for the life of the phone
> 128GB or 256GB of cloud storage = ? for the life of the phone
> 128GB or 256GB of sd storage = ? for the life of the phone
>
> Assume 7 years.
> And no, you can't say the internal storage is free because it's not.
>
> If you can make a logical argument, then let's hear your logic.
>
> And no, people who claim to not be using sd who *also* paid through the
> nose for more storage via internal/cloud methods, does not count.
>
No, we did not pay through the nose.
> It's absurd, in fact, for someone to pay through the nose to replace the
> missing storage of sd cards, and then "claim" they don't need storage.
>
> Logic:
> a. If they paid for it
> b. Then they needed it
Flawed logic.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 10:24 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Storage media availability over time |
| Message-ID | <1164sdj$2j40$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #155087 |
Carlos E. R. wrote: >> And no, people who claim to not be using sd who *also* paid through the >> nose for more storage via internal/cloud methods, does not count. >> > > No, we did not pay through the nose. There's a reason I ask you to invest in a basic class in elementary logic. As you're well aware, I have over 1000 packages installed on my 64GB phone. As you're well aware, I have a 128GB sd card on that phone. For "data". You are well aware I get videos/image of the grandchildren nearly every day (which I store on the external sd card but even that is filling up lately). So, let's compare costs now, using simple logic given you know the above. 1. How much would it cost me to double my storage to 256GB with sd tech? 2. Versus, how much it would cost me to buy that storage on "the cloud"? 3. Versus, how much would it cost me to buy a whole new phone to get it? You don't need to answer the question because the question is the logic.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 20:35 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Storage media availability over time |
| Message-ID | <nembb3Fr40fU8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #155089 |
On 2026-08-19 20:24, Maria Sophia wrote:
> Carlos E. R. wrote:
>>> And no, people who claim to not be using sd who *also* paid through the
>>> nose for more storage via internal/cloud methods, does not count.
>>>
>>
>> No, we did not pay through the nose.
>
> There's a reason I ask you to invest in a basic class in elementary logic.
Flawed logic, that starts with your opinions, not undisputed facts.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-19 12:04 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Storage media availability over time |
| Message-ID | <116527s$to1$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #155091 |
Carlos E. R. wrote:
>> There's a reason I ask you to invest in a basic class in elementary logic.
>
> Flawed logic, that starts with your opinions, not undisputed facts.
Hi Carlos,
Without sd storage, people are forced to pay thru the nose to get it back.
I get it that you're butt hurt that I showed your argument wasn't logical.
So I don't mind that, in your emotional defense, you claim I'm illogical.
And yet, in your entire life, you've never heard me claim an illogical
statement, so, I simply need to repeat the basic logic of using sd cards.
It's absurd for you to claim that the difference in cost isn't appreciable.
Now, you *can* claim that the difference in storage is
a. Varies in speed between {sd, cloud, internal storage}
b. Varies in reliability between {sd, cloud, internal storage}
c. Varies in Internet needs between cloud and sd/internal storage
d. Varies in hardware needs between {sd, cloud, internal storage}
etc.
Never for a moment ever think I'm not eminently logical in all respects.
Both internal storage and cloud storage are *different* than sd storage.
But they're both *more expensive* than sd storage, which is my main point.
Assessment:
Anyone paying more for a phone larger than about 64GB is wasting their
money given I have over a thousand packages on my 64GB Samsung Galaxy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web