Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #21118 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-22 10:06 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-07-23 08:39 +1000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 353 — 49 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-22 10:06 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 10:23 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 08:56 +1000
anonymous sims in EU (was: Who pays for a phone..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-07-23 20:21 +0200
Re: anonymous sims in EU tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-03 20:04 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 03:22 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 10:27 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-22 17:00 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 13:26 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 10:00 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 14:22 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-07-22 10:07 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-22 20:06 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? DevilsPGD <boogabooga@crazyhat.net> - 2015-07-22 13:13 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 09:08 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Chris Blunt <mail@nospam.com> - 2015-07-24 11:22 +0800
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 14:36 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:12 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-25 19:34 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 16:58 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 17:51 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 09:57 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-24 14:32 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Wolfgang Barth <barthwo@spamfence.net> - 2015-07-24 15:38 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-07-24 09:26 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:22 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-07-25 11:19 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:17 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-07-25 11:18 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-25 19:47 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-27 09:46 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 03:50 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 06:59 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-04 16:21 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 08:52 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 05:30 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-04 19:33 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-06 09:39 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 12:17 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 05:41 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-04 17:25 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 05:26 +1000
voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-05 20:08 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-05 14:58 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-05 15:16 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 12:41 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-05 16:03 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 06:24 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 13:34 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 04:51 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-10-21 19:45 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 09:17 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-10-24 17:49 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 13:40 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "NotMe" <me@privacy.net> - 2015-10-24 19:03 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-25 09:52 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 22:28 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Walter Briscoe <wbriscoe@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2015-10-25 08:17 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 10:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-10-25 18:50 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-25 18:00 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 10:16 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-26 07:24 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 10:13 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-27 07:09 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 20:03 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-27 18:33 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "NotMe" <me@privacy.net> - 2015-10-26 08:07 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-10-25 14:58 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "NotMe" <me@privacy.net> - 2015-10-25 17:10 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-10-26 10:08 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 10:09 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-26 07:27 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 10:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-27 07:11 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 20:09 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Walter Briscoe <wbriscoe@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2015-10-26 21:24 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 23:18 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 13:22 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 13:41 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 14:53 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-06 15:35 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 23:26 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-06 16:35 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 09:46 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 14:40 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-07 06:02 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-08 01:09 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 14:04 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas DevilsPGD <boogabooga@crazyhat.net> - 2015-08-09 00:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-08-09 12:42 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2015-08-10 00:18 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-08-09 17:50 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-09 23:19 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-09 23:10 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 08:43 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 13:40 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-11 00:21 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 06:57 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-11 09:57 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:20 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-12 11:21 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-12 19:50 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-12 16:21 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-13 12:08 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-13 09:58 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-13 17:04 +0200
security concept "rule of least priviledge" (was: voting booths in repu areas) Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-17 16:42 -0400
Re: security concept "rule of least priviledge" (was: voting booths in repu areas) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-18 10:08 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 06:26 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-13 09:38 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-13 17:14 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-13 11:42 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-13 18:47 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-13 14:22 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 07:00 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-14 11:34 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 06:53 +0700
what's entrapment (was: voting booths in republican areas) Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-15 14:13 +0000
Re: what's entrapment (was: voting booths in republican areas) John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:20 +0700
Re: what's entrapment Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-18 22:06 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 06:43 +0700
prosecutors do not care about guilt (was: voting booths in republican areas) Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-15 13:42 +0000
Re: prosecutors do not care about guilt (was: voting booths in republican areas) John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:08 +0700
Re: prosecutors do not care about guilt (was: voting booths in republican areas) Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-16 17:14 +0200
Re: prosecutors do not care about guilt Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-17 22:57 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-12 13:07 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-08-12 18:31 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-12 22:44 -0400
why disclose personal info (was: voting booths in republican areas) Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-15 13:20 +0000
Re: why disclose personal info David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-08-15 15:12 +0100
Re: why disclose personal info Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-08-15 15:08 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:26 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:23 -0700
accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-15 09:50 -0400
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) lew <citrustwosac@google.mailer.company.invalid> - 2015-08-15 16:36 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 10:55 -0700
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-15 14:44 -0500
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 19:34 -0700
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:54 +0700
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-18 11:02 +1000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-22 12:55 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-22 19:08 +0200
security vs. manners (was: accommodating unreasonable searches..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-24 00:48 +0200
Re: security vs. manners Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-24 14:18 -0400
Re: security vs. manners The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:59 -0700
Re: security vs. manners Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-25 13:40 +0200
Re: security vs. manners Travis Bickle <3S96@taxi.net> - 2015-08-25 12:31 -0400
Re: security vs. manners lew <citrustwosac@google.mailer.company.invalid> - 2015-08-25 16:38 +0000
Re: security vs. manners "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-26 09:29 -0400
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 10:19 -0400
Re: security vs. manners "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-26 11:45 -0400
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 13:53 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-26 14:39 -0500
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 16:56 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-26 16:08 -0500
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:33 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-26 17:32 -0500
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 19:51 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-26 18:59 -0500
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-27 08:42 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-27 09:24 -0500
Re: security vs. manners tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-26 22:52 -0400
Re: security vs. manners The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 09:57 -0700
Re: security vs. manners Bob Henson <rh547477@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 15:36 +0100
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-25 21:04 -0400
Re: security vs. manners tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-26 03:25 -0400
Re: security vs. manners "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-26 09:26 -0400
Re: security vs. manners The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 12:18 -0700
Re: security vs. manners (was: accommodating unreasonable searches..) TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-25 08:36 -0400
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2015-08-16 23:19 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) "Stuart McCall" <smccall@myunrealbox.com> - 2015-08-17 18:08 +0100
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-17 17:22 -0400
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2015-08-17 23:15 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) "Stuart McCall" <smccall@myunrealbox.com> - 2015-08-18 17:11 +0100
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2015-08-18 23:03 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) Joe Makowiec <makowiec@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-19 13:53 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 06:49 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-06 17:25 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 19:51 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 19:31 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 21:56 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-06 20:51 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-06 21:48 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 19:29 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-07 15:40 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-07 00:08 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-07 21:08 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-08 01:04 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 13:58 +1000
do absentee voters need photo id? (was: voting booths in republican areas) Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-08 14:03 +0200
Re: do absentee voters need photo id? (was: voting booths in republican areas) Elias <elias@nowherenohow.com> - 2015-08-08 10:02 -0500
Re: do absentee voters need photo id? (was: voting booths in republican areas) Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-08 21:28 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-06 15:23 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas News <News@Group.Post> - 2015-08-06 07:00 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 04:59 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:33 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-06 15:34 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 18:50 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 16:55 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 09:12 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 08:40 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-06 07:26 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 12:16 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 13:24 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 12:16 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 13:22 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-06 07:35 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-08-06 14:36 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 12:18 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 13:31 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:46 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 14:04 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 12:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 14:27 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:44 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 13:58 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 12:12 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:36 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-10 20:05 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 06:18 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-05 15:27 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 13:38 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 15:25 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-05 15:19 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 09:07 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 08:38 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-06 07:25 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 11:11 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-06 07:31 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 12:02 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 11:14 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:38 -0700
leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-07 14:58 +0200
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-07 10:56 -0400
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 05:16 +1000
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-25 22:45 +0200
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-26 09:24 -0400
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-27 13:47 +0000
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-27 10:20 -0400
q) campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? a) education Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-09-03 08:44 +0000
comp.mobile.android "The Sorceress of Qar" <sorceress@qar.qanar.com> - 2015-08-27 09:23 -0500
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-27 13:01 -0400
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201509.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-09-06 00:12 +0200
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-08 16:21 -0700
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-22 23:11 +0200
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 20:54 -0700
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-08-22 23:40 -0500
Bev's reverse logic (was: leader's campaigns..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-09-03 09:22 +0200
Re: Bev's reverse logic David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-09-03 08:44 +0100
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-23 08:49 -0400
small campaign donations (was: leader's campaigns..) Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-31 16:06 -0400
leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-12 04:08 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> - 2015-08-05 18:13 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 16:02 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Mike Yetto <unet.lighthouse@xoxy.net> - 2015-08-06 18:27 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> - 2015-08-07 12:36 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-07 12:38 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-10 08:51 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-10 22:28 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-11 08:53 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-11 01:06 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-11 10:25 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-11 17:46 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-12 09:54 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-05 19:00 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> - 2015-08-07 12:39 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-08-06 16:14 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 09:07 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-18 09:49 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 11:46 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-18 12:38 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 18:51 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-19 11:14 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 08:31 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-19 12:56 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 11:57 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-19 15:04 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 12:22 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-19 15:36 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 06:09 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 13:10 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:03 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 12:39 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Joe Makowiec <makowiec@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-19 20:09 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 14:27 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 14:58 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 16:10 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-20 08:32 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:14 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-24 08:33 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-24 09:37 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 15:27 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:13 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-19 16:34 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 14:46 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-20 12:40 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-20 09:55 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-20 10:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-20 22:35 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:09 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:02 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-19 00:03 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 19:01 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2015-08-19 19:08 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 09:34 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-18 23:57 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 19:05 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 09:28 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2015-08-19 19:14 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-19 09:09 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 07:15 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 05:56 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 05:52 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 13:15 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas David Solimano <david@solimano.org> - 2015-08-06 22:52 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 21:59 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 20:26 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 14:03 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:11 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 05:34 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-25 20:04 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Dieghettino <d@casa.mia> - 2015-07-26 06:41 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 08:45 +1000
non-EU travellers must carry passports (was: Who pays..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-01 20:26 +0200
Re: non-EU travellers must carry passports cl@isbd.net - 2015-08-01 21:33 +0100
Re: non-EU travellers must carry passports tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-03 23:11 -0400
Re: non-EU travellers must carry passports cl@isbd.net - 2015-08-04 14:25 +0100
Re: non-EU travellers must carry passports Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-05 18:56 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 04:05 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 07:03 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 14:11 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-04 11:19 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 12:19 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 12:32 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-04 15:40 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 14:15 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 05:36 +1000
id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-05 20:05 +0000
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 13:19 -0700
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 04:46 -0400
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 09:10 -0400
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 14:51 -0400
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 14:58 -0400
id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-08 08:48 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-26 18:45 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 10:04 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-27 09:51 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-28 09:30 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 20:24 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-25 19:57 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 16:57 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 08:39 +1000
Page 11 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 18 Next page →
| From | "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 09:12 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mpvmdf$4s0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21704 |
"The Real Bev" <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote in message news:mptr75$47q$1@dont-email.me... > On 08/05/2015 12:41 PM, Michelle Steiner wrote: >> In article <mptma8$feh$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Democrats don't support voter ID for one simple reason - they have >>> no >>> interest in prohibiting voter fraud because they benefit from it. >> >> Bullshit! Study after study shows that voter ID fraud is virtually >> nonexistent. > > Would you care to explain just how that might work? I'm serious about > this. I've heard that before, but how can there be voter fraud if > there's no way to determine which voters are legitimate? Good question. I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me how in some precints in Philadelphia, Obama recieved *over* 100% of the registered vote while Romney received zero votes. >> Republicans want strict voter ID laws because the poor >> and minorities are less likely to have photo ID, and the poor and >> minorities are more likely to vote Democratic. > > No, we don't want the illegals to vote. Why is this so hard to > understand? BTW, I used to be a Republican until they stopped being > republicans; now I'm a Libertarian, sort of. I'm leaning that way too. >>> This notion that requiring voter ID is a political strategy and >>> that the purpose is to scare off voters is pure bunk. >> >> It is a political strategy designed to reduce the number of poor and >> minority voters. It is a "cure" for a virtually nonexistent problem. > > If LEGAL poor and minority voters can't figure out how to acquire the > proper documentation (which you have to do for just about every damn > thing anyway) maybe they've in effect forfeited their right to vote. > Not everything is easy or automatic, nor should it be. If you care > enough about something you'll figure out a way to do it. > > -- > Cheers, Bev > =========================================== > Lawyering: the only profession that if you > didn't have it you wouldn't need it. > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 08:40 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <6so6satd61rr3mkl3t20m1cvkcufc7282h@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #21737 |
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:12:47 -0400, "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote: >"The Real Bev" <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:mptr75$47q$1@dont-email.me... >> On 08/05/2015 12:41 PM, Michelle Steiner wrote: >>> In article <mptma8$feh$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Democrats don't support voter ID for one simple reason - they have >>>> no >>>> interest in prohibiting voter fraud because they benefit from it. >>> >>> Bullshit! Study after study shows that voter ID fraud is virtually >>> nonexistent. >> >> Would you care to explain just how that might work? I'm serious about >> this. I've heard that before, but how can there be voter fraud if >> there's no way to determine which voters are legitimate? > >Good question. I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me how in >some precints in Philadelphia, Obama recieved *over* 100% of the >registered vote while Romney received zero votes. Haven't heard that one. Do you have a cite? > >>> Republicans want strict voter ID laws because the poor >>> and minorities are less likely to have photo ID, and the poor and >>> minorities are more likely to vote Democratic. >> >> No, we don't want the illegals to vote. Why is this so hard to >> understand? BTW, I used to be a Republican until they stopped being >> republicans; now I'm a Libertarian, sort of. > >I'm leaning that way too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 07:26 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <2015080607265454438-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #21740 |
On 2015-08-06 13:40:39 +0000, BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> said: > On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:12:47 -0400, "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote: > >> "The Real Bev" <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:mptr75$47q$1@dont-email.me... >>> On 08/05/2015 12:41 PM, Michelle Steiner wrote: >>>> In article <mptma8$feh$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Democrats don't support voter ID for one simple reason - they have >>>>> no >>>>> interest in prohibiting voter fraud because they benefit from it. >>>> >>>> Bullshit! Study after study shows that voter ID fraud is virtually >>>> nonexistent. >>> >>> Would you care to explain just how that might work? I'm serious about >>> this. I've heard that before, but how can there be voter fraud if >>> there's no way to determine which voters are legitimate? >> >> Good question. I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me how in >> some precints in Philadelphia, Obama recieved *over* 100% of the >> registered vote while Romney received zero votes. > > Haven't heard that one. Do you have a cite? Tea Party and birther anti-Obama mythology. -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 12:16 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mq016a$efa$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21745 |
"Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message
news:2015080607265454438-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
> On 2015-08-06 13:40:39 +0000, BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> said:
>
>> On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:12:47 -0400, "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> "The Real Bev" <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:mptr75$47q$1@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 08/05/2015 12:41 PM, Michelle Steiner wrote:
>>>>> In article <mptma8$feh$1@dont-email.me>, PAS
>>>>> <ntotrr@optonline.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Democrats don't support voter ID for one simple reason - they
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> no
>>>>>> interest in prohibiting voter fraud because they benefit from it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bullshit! Study after study shows that voter ID fraud is
>>>>> virtually
>>>>> nonexistent.
>>>>
>>>> Would you care to explain just how that might work? I'm serious
>>>> about
>>>> this. I've heard that before, but how can there be voter fraud if
>>>> there's no way to determine which voters are legitimate?
>>>
>>> Good question. I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me how
>>> in
>>> some precints in Philadelphia, Obama recieved *over* 100% of the
>>> registered vote while Romney received zero votes.
>>
>> Haven't heard that one. Do you have a cite?
>
> Tea Party and birther anti-Obama mythology.
BS. It's easy to find if you'd care to look. See my other post.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 13:24 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <9f97sap4jgoduhvhs6hkrrvv899v4gi7dg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #21756 |
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:16:42 -0400, "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote:
>"Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message
>news:2015080607265454438-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
>> On 2015-08-06 13:40:39 +0000, BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> said:
>>
>>> On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:12:47 -0400, "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "The Real Bev" <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:mptr75$47q$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>> On 08/05/2015 12:41 PM, Michelle Steiner wrote:
>>>>>> In article <mptma8$feh$1@dont-email.me>, PAS
>>>>>> <ntotrr@optonline.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Democrats don't support voter ID for one simple reason - they
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>> interest in prohibiting voter fraud because they benefit from it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bullshit! Study after study shows that voter ID fraud is
>>>>>> virtually
>>>>>> nonexistent.
>>>>>
>>>>> Would you care to explain just how that might work? I'm serious
>>>>> about
>>>>> this. I've heard that before, but how can there be voter fraud if
>>>>> there's no way to determine which voters are legitimate?
>>>>
>>>> Good question. I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me how
>>>> in
>>>> some precints in Philadelphia, Obama recieved *over* 100% of the
>>>> registered vote while Romney received zero votes.
>>>
>>> Haven't heard that one. Do you have a cite?
>>
>> Tea Party and birther anti-Obama mythology.
>
>BS. It's easy to find if you'd care to look. See my other post.
I did. It was shaky evidence and it said nothing about any
percentages.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 12:16 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mq0152$ea6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21740 |
"BobbyK" <bknight@Conramp.net> wrote in message news:6so6satd61rr3mkl3t20m1cvkcufc7282h@4ax.com... > On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:12:47 -0400, "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote: > >>"The Real Bev" <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote in message >>news:mptr75$47q$1@dont-email.me... >>> On 08/05/2015 12:41 PM, Michelle Steiner wrote: >>>> In article <mptma8$feh$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Democrats don't support voter ID for one simple reason - they have >>>>> no >>>>> interest in prohibiting voter fraud because they benefit from it. >>>> >>>> Bullshit! Study after study shows that voter ID fraud is virtually >>>> nonexistent. >>> >>> Would you care to explain just how that might work? I'm serious >>> about >>> this. I've heard that before, but how can there be voter fraud if >>> there's no way to determine which voters are legitimate? >> >>Good question. I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me how in >>some precints in Philadelphia, Obama recieved *over* 100% of the >>registered vote while Romney received zero votes. > > Haven't heard that one. Do you have a cite? Easy enough to find: http://www.philly.com/philly/hot_topics/Voting_Divisions_Where_Romney_Got_No_Votes.html And there's never any real voter fraud http://www.punditpress.com/2012/11/breaking-st-lucie-county-florida-had.html >>>> Republicans want strict voter ID laws because the poor >>>> and minorities are less likely to have photo ID, and the poor and >>>> minorities are more likely to vote Democratic. >>> >>> No, we don't want the illegals to vote. Why is this so hard to >>> understand? BTW, I used to be a Republican until they stopped being >>> republicans; now I'm a Libertarian, sort of. >> >>I'm leaning that way too. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 13:22 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <p097sa13r9j0fdv7ksj4111hfj44d115pd@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #21755 |
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:16:02 -0400, "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote: >"BobbyK" <bknight@Conramp.net> wrote in message >news:6so6satd61rr3mkl3t20m1cvkcufc7282h@4ax.com... >> On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:12:47 -0400, "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote: >> >>>"The Real Bev" <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>news:mptr75$47q$1@dont-email.me... >>>> On 08/05/2015 12:41 PM, Michelle Steiner wrote: >>>>> In article <mptma8$feh$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Democrats don't support voter ID for one simple reason - they have >>>>>> no >>>>>> interest in prohibiting voter fraud because they benefit from it. >>>>> >>>>> Bullshit! Study after study shows that voter ID fraud is virtually >>>>> nonexistent. >>>> >>>> Would you care to explain just how that might work? I'm serious >>>> about >>>> this. I've heard that before, but how can there be voter fraud if >>>> there's no way to determine which voters are legitimate? >>> >>>Good question. I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me how in >>>some precints in Philadelphia, Obama recieved *over* 100% of the >>>registered vote while Romney received zero votes. >> >> Haven't heard that one. Do you have a cite? > >Easy enough to find: > >http://www.philly.com/philly/hot_topics/Voting_Divisions_Where_Romney_Got_No_Votes.html You have to be kidding. That could be a letter from a nut or an op ed blog. A cite has to have the origin to be of any use. > >And there's never any real voter fraud > >http://www.punditpress.com/2012/11/breaking-st-lucie-county-florida-had.html That's more like it. However, where's the voter fraud? Fraud, yes but probably by those counting the votes. Big difference. Are you simple minded enough to think that over 72,000 people voted illegally? >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 07:35 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <060820150735157010%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #21737 |
In article <mpvmdf$4s0$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote: > > Would you care to explain just how that might work? I'm serious about > > this. I've heard that before, but how can there be voter fraud if > > there's no way to determine which voters are legitimate? > > Good question. I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me how in > some precints in Philadelphia, Obama recieved *over* 100% of the > registered vote while Romney received zero votes. I'm still waiting for evidence that this actually happened. Such evidence will never come forward because Obama didn't receive over 100% of the votes anywhere. <http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 14:36 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <slrnms6sb3.121s.g.kreme@amelia.local> |
| In reply to | #21747 |
In message <060820150735157010%michelle@michelle.org> Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: > In article <mpvmdf$4s0$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> > wrote: >> > Would you care to explain just how that might work? I'm serious about >> > this. I've heard that before, but how can there be voter fraud if >> > there's no way to determine which voters are legitimate? >> >> Good question. I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me how in >> some precints in Philadelphia, Obama recieved *over* 100% of the >> registered vote while Romney received zero votes. > I'm still waiting for evidence that this actually happened. You will be waiting a *long* time. Hope you're not holding your breath. > Such evidence will never come forward because Obama didn't receive > over 100% of the votes anywhere. Yep. > <http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp> There is nothing so stupid that a Republican will not believe it. -- I'm just going to go home, lie down, and listen to country music. The music of pain.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 12:18 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mq018n$emc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21747 |
"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message news:060820150735157010%michelle@michelle.org... > In article <mpvmdf$4s0$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> > wrote: > >> > Would you care to explain just how that might work? I'm serious >> > about >> > this. I've heard that before, but how can there be voter fraud if >> > there's no way to determine which voters are legitimate? >> >> Good question. I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me how in >> some precints in Philadelphia, Obama recieved *over* 100% of the >> registered vote while Romney received zero votes. > > I'm still waiting for evidence that this actually happened. Such > evidence will never come forward because Obama didn't receive over > 100% > of the votes anywhere. > > <http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp> Don't be so quick to trust snopes. If I cited Fox News you'd dismiss them as partisan, so is snopes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 13:31 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <5p97sa5cgefgsh3h8b3r65eqt1coq0kobm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #21757 |
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:18:00 -0400, "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote: >"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message >news:060820150735157010%michelle@michelle.org... >> In article <mpvmdf$4s0$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> >> wrote: >> >>> > Would you care to explain just how that might work? I'm serious >>> > about >>> > this. I've heard that before, but how can there be voter fraud if >>> > there's no way to determine which voters are legitimate? >>> >>> Good question. I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me how in >>> some precints in Philadelphia, Obama recieved *over* 100% of the >>> registered vote while Romney received zero votes. >> >> I'm still waiting for evidence that this actually happened. Such >> evidence will never come forward because Obama didn't receive over >> 100% >> of the votes anywhere. >> >> <http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp> > >Don't be so quick to trust snopes. If I cited Fox News you'd dismiss >them as partisan, so is snopes. LOL. Only to someone who doesn't read. Your partisanship is even more obvious now.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 11:46 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mq09v8$ib7$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21762 |
On 08/06/2015 11:31 AM, BobbyK wrote: > On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:18:00 -0400, "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote: > >>"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message >>news:060820150735157010%michelle@michelle.org... >>> In article <mpvmdf$4s0$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> > Would you care to explain just how that might work? I'm serious >>>> > about >>>> > this. I've heard that before, but how can there be voter fraud if >>>> > there's no way to determine which voters are legitimate? >>>> >>>> Good question. I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me how in >>>> some precints in Philadelphia, Obama recieved *over* 100% of the >>>> registered vote while Romney received zero votes. >>> >>> I'm still waiting for evidence that this actually happened. Such >>> evidence will never come forward because Obama didn't receive over >>> 100% >>> of the votes anywhere. >>> >>> <http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp> >> >>Don't be so quick to trust snopes. If I cited Fox News you'd dismiss >>them as partisan, so is snopes. > > LOL. Only to someone who doesn't read. Your partisanship is even > more obvious now. Rush Limbaugh doesn't do rigorous fact-checking either. Sometimes 'sloppy' is the same as 'dishonest'. Never trust the word of anybody who gets paid to tell you something. -- Cheers, Bev $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Polish loan sharks: they loan you money and then skip town.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 14:04 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <pjb7sadbauqtguav11u9462l1t0oo1n5ep@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #21768 |
On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:46:33 -0700, The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >On 08/06/2015 11:31 AM, BobbyK wrote: >> On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:18:00 -0400, "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote: >> >>>"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message >>>news:060820150735157010%michelle@michelle.org... >>>> In article <mpvmdf$4s0$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> > Would you care to explain just how that might work? I'm serious >>>>> > about >>>>> > this. I've heard that before, but how can there be voter fraud if >>>>> > there's no way to determine which voters are legitimate? >>>>> >>>>> Good question. I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me how in >>>>> some precints in Philadelphia, Obama recieved *over* 100% of the >>>>> registered vote while Romney received zero votes. >>>> >>>> I'm still waiting for evidence that this actually happened. Such >>>> evidence will never come forward because Obama didn't receive over >>>> 100% >>>> of the votes anywhere. >>>> >>>> <http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp> >>> >>>Don't be so quick to trust snopes. If I cited Fox News you'd dismiss >>>them as partisan, so is snopes. >> >> LOL. Only to someone who doesn't read. Your partisanship is even >> more obvious now. > >Rush Limbaugh doesn't do rigorous fact-checking either. Sometimes >'sloppy' is the same as 'dishonest'. Bev, you're all over the map. You said that you were disappointed with Snopes, then when I suggest that PAS didn't check their report well you compare him to Limbaugh, seemingly agreeing with me. > >Never trust the word of anybody who gets paid to tell you something. In Snopes' examples they offered absolute and concrete evidence of their claims of falsehoods. That's something you can trust because they gave examples and sites....real sites.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 12:14 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mq0bj7$p2d$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21773 |
On 08/06/2015 12:04 PM, BobbyK wrote: > On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:46:33 -0700, The Real Bev > <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On 08/06/2015 11:31 AM, BobbyK wrote: >>> On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:18:00 -0400, "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote: >>> >>>>"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message >>>>news:060820150735157010%michelle@michelle.org... >>>>> In article <mpvmdf$4s0$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> > Would you care to explain just how that might work? I'm serious >>>>>> > about >>>>>> > this. I've heard that before, but how can there be voter fraud if >>>>>> > there's no way to determine which voters are legitimate? >>>>>> >>>>>> Good question. I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me how in >>>>>> some precints in Philadelphia, Obama recieved *over* 100% of the >>>>>> registered vote while Romney received zero votes. >>>>> >>>>> I'm still waiting for evidence that this actually happened. Such >>>>> evidence will never come forward because Obama didn't receive over >>>>> 100% >>>>> of the votes anywhere. >>>>> >>>>> <http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp> >>>> >>>>Don't be so quick to trust snopes. If I cited Fox News you'd dismiss >>>>them as partisan, so is snopes. >>> >>> LOL. Only to someone who doesn't read. Your partisanship is even >>> more obvious now. >> >>Rush Limbaugh doesn't do rigorous fact-checking either. Sometimes >>'sloppy' is the same as 'dishonest'. > > Bev, you're all over the map. You said that you were disappointed > with Snopes, then when I suggest that PAS didn't check their report > well you compare him to Limbaugh, seemingly agreeing with me. > >> >>Never trust the word of anybody who gets paid to tell you something. > > In Snopes' examples they offered absolute and concrete evidence of > their claims of falsehoods. That's something you can trust because > they gave examples and sites....real sites. Nobody tells the truth all the time. Period. Nobody said I have to follow anybody's party line. -- Cheers, Bev =============================================================== The people who don't know what they're doing and the people who don't realize it are generally the same people." -- DAbel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 14:27 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <lqc7sadi5s6ej8krblic8fr9me98lik70i@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #21776 |
On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 12:14:16 -0700, The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >On 08/06/2015 12:04 PM, BobbyK wrote: >> On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:46:33 -0700, The Real Bev >> <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >>>Never trust the word of anybody who gets paid to tell you something. >> >> In Snopes' examples they offered absolute and concrete evidence of >> their claims of falsehoods. That's something you can trust because >> they gave examples and sites....real sites. > >Nobody tells the truth all the time. Period. Nobody said I have to >follow anybody's party line. Wait a minute. You're disappointed in Snopes because they can't be trusted on this specific item? They're spouting party lines? They blew all of the voter fraud items away with lies? Is that what you think? Then tell us which were lies and prove it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 11:44 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mq09rj$ib7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21757 |
On 08/06/2015 09:18 AM, PAS wrote: > "Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: >> <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote: >> >>>> Would you care to explain just how that might work? I'm >>>> serious about this. I've heard that before, but how can there >>>> be voter fraud if there's no way to determine which voters are >>>> legitimate? Still waiting for an answer here. If somebody steals your stuff and you can't prove it's yours, then 'theft' didn't happen and the thief gets to keep it. If there's no way at all to prove that the stuff belongs to anybody, it's stupid to be honest -- which explains why politicians are the way they are. >>> Good question. I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me >>> how in some precints in Philadelphia, Obama recieved *over* 100% >>> of the registered vote while Romney received zero votes. >> >> I'm still waiting for evidence that this actually happened. Such >> evidence will never come forward because Obama didn't receive over >> 100% of the votes anywhere. >> >> <http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp> > > Don't be so quick to trust snopes. If I cited Fox News you'd > dismiss them as partisan, so is snopes. I was sorry to see that. I'd like to believe that Snopes is still useful for non-political stuff, but it may be that EVERYTHING is political in some say. -- Cheers, Bev $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Polish loan sharks: they loan you money and then skip town.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 13:58 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <v5b7sadqvkgvhah4dlfcbl0guhvvjd9ofs@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #21767 |
On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:44:35 -0700, The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >On 08/06/2015 09:18 AM, PAS wrote: >> "Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: >>> <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote: >>> >>>>> Would you care to explain just how that might work? I'm >>>>> serious about this. I've heard that before, but how can there >>>>> be voter fraud if there's no way to determine which voters are >>>>> legitimate? > >Still waiting for an answer here. If somebody steals your stuff and you >can't prove it's yours, then 'theft' didn't happen and the thief gets to >keep it. If there's no way at all to prove that the stuff belongs to >anybody, it's stupid to be honest -- which explains why politicians are >the way they are. > >>>> Good question. I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me >>>> how in some precints in Philadelphia, Obama recieved *over* 100% >>>> of the registered vote while Romney received zero votes. >>> >>> I'm still waiting for evidence that this actually happened. Such >>> evidence will never come forward because Obama didn't receive over >>> 100% of the votes anywhere. >>> >>> <http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp> >> >> Don't be so quick to trust snopes. If I cited Fox News you'd >> dismiss them as partisan, so is snopes. > >I was sorry to see that. I'd like to believe that Snopes is still >useful for non-political stuff, but it may be that EVERYTHING is >political in some say. Sorry to see what? The facts that they pointed out that proved falsehoods?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 12:12 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mq0bgl$p2d$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21771 |
On 08/06/2015 11:58 AM, BobbyK wrote: > On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:44:35 -0700, The Real Bev > <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On 08/06/2015 09:18 AM, PAS wrote: >>> "Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: >>>> <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Would you care to explain just how that might work? I'm >>>>>> serious about this. I've heard that before, but how can there >>>>>> be voter fraud if there's no way to determine which voters are >>>>>> legitimate? >> >>Still waiting for an answer here. If somebody steals your stuff and you >>can't prove it's yours, then 'theft' didn't happen and the thief gets to >>keep it. If there's no way at all to prove that the stuff belongs to >>anybody, it's stupid to be honest -- which explains why politicians are >>the way they are. >> >>>>> Good question. I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me >>>>> how in some precints in Philadelphia, Obama recieved *over* 100% >>>>> of the registered vote while Romney received zero votes. >>>> >>>> I'm still waiting for evidence that this actually happened. Such >>>> evidence will never come forward because Obama didn't receive over >>>> 100% of the votes anywhere. >>>> >>>> <http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp> >>> >>> Don't be so quick to trust snopes. If I cited Fox News you'd >>> dismiss them as partisan, so is snopes. >> >>I was sorry to see that. I'd like to believe that Snopes is still >>useful for non-political stuff, but it may be that EVERYTHING is >>political in some say. > > Sorry to see what? The facts that they pointed out that proved > falsehoods? Sorry to see that Snopes can't be trusted 100%. It would be nice to think that there are people who regard truth as valuable. -- Cheers, Bev ======================================================= The people who don't know what they're doing and the people who don't realize it are generally the same people." -- DAbel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 11:36 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mq09c0$fh9$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21737 |
On 08/06/2015 06:12 AM, PAS wrote: > "The Real Bev" <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:mptr75$47q$1@dont-email.me... >> On 08/05/2015 12:41 PM, Michelle Steiner wrote: >>> In article <mptma8$feh$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Democrats don't support voter ID for one simple reason - they have >>>> no >>>> interest in prohibiting voter fraud because they benefit from it. >>> >>> Bullshit! Study after study shows that voter ID fraud is virtually >>> nonexistent. >> >> Would you care to explain just how that might work? I'm serious about >> this. I've heard that before, but how can there be voter fraud if >> there's no way to determine which voters are legitimate? > > Good question. I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me how in > some precints in Philadelphia, Obama recieved *over* 100% of the > registered vote while Romney received zero votes. One of the sites Michelle referred to explained that: "Hey, it could happen!" Good to know there's a credible explanation. -- Cheers, Bev $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Polish loan sharks: they loan you money and then skip town.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 20:05 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <a0743e96a0b9797df3a8d48b29c08035@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #21704 |
> No, we don't want the illegals to vote. Why is this so hard to > understand? * Because the ad runs in swing states (e.g. Ohio), not a southern border state. * Because the ads are paid for by the republican party, who is hardly interested in giving advice to illegal immigrants that would prevent them being caught. * Because no illegal immigrant would jeopardize their presence here by trying to cast an insignificant vote. * Particularly when most illegal immigrants (from Mexico) favor Christian-right politics - which also happens to be attributed to the most xenophobic political party of the land. IOW, no party represents them well.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 18 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web