Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #144722 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andrew <andys@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-12-02 04:40 +0000 |
| Last post | 2024-12-05 09:11 -0600 |
| Articles | 11 on this page of 51 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-02 04:40 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2024-12-01 23:19 -0600
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-02 05:51 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2024-12-02 01:23 -0600
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-02 07:54 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-12-02 11:15 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-02 16:40 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-02 16:19 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-02 17:03 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2024-12-02 13:42 -0600
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-03 01:23 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2024-12-03 07:59 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-02 13:58 +0100
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-02 16:27 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-02 21:24 +0100
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-03 01:40 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-03 14:39 +0100
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-04 04:38 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-04 12:57 +0100
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-05 06:30 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2024-12-05 09:11 -0600
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-05 19:09 +0100
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2024-12-02 15:35 -0600
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-02 23:26 +0100
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-03 01:55 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-03 01:48 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2024-12-02 21:02 -0600
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-03 03:25 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-03 14:41 +0100
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-04 04:42 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2024-12-04 13:02 -0600
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-04 20:13 +0100
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-05 06:39 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-05 19:10 +0100
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-05 06:37 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2024-12-05 09:08 -0600
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-05 19:11 +0100
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-12-06 11:08 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? D <noreply@mixmin.net> - 2024-12-02 15:02 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-12-02 23:54 +0100
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-03 02:06 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-12-03 16:40 +0100
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-12-03 16:40 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-04 05:01 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-04 12:57 +0100
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2024-12-04 13:05 -0600
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-05 06:42 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-04 04:53 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2024-12-04 13:41 -0600
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-05 06:47 +0000
Re: Why do people use the Google Play Store search engine? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2024-12-05 09:11 -0600
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
| From | Andrew <andys@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-03 02:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vilp3h$re8$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #144779 |
Arno Welzel wrote on Mon, 2 Dec 2024 23:54:35 +0100 : >> Why do people use just about the dumbest possible search engine instead? > > Because they don't know better. Yes. You're the only one who knows the answer to that question, which is what I'm actually trying to "fix" in my kind-hearted way on this newsgroup. <https://skyica.com/appfinder/features/> I'm trying to inform the technologically intelligent people on this newsgroup that making decisions based *only* on Google Play Store app search (and filter) results, means those people are always ignorant. <https://xdaforums.com/t/app-6-0-app-finder-the-most-advanced-search-engine-for-android-apps.4578809/> As a result, they don't even know what they don't know. Yet, the sad reality is, they think they do. That's why they're always making such bad decisions on what apps to use. On the other question though, if you do install the Skyica App Finder <https://skyica.com/appfinder/get/> <https://skyica.com/appfinder/get/App-Finder-1.4.1a-U.apk> Name: App-Finder-1.4.1a-U.apk Size: 4497432 bytes (4392 KiB) SHA256: 7075AFFE7593C03594DA6A1EB67AA955EBB2EE23FA28198FD49D5821602EC2B9 Please let me know if it asks you for money as it never asks me for money. And I've used it since, oh, let me look on XDA when I first found out about it and when I started working with the developer to make it work with phones that have no Google Account and hence no Google Play Store app... a. This is my latest post (July 2024) <https://xdaforums.com/t/app-6-0-app-finder-the-most-advanced-search-engine-for-android-apps.4578809/post-89597887> b. This seems to be my first post (September 2023) <https://xdaforums.com/t/app-6-0-app-finder-the-most-advanced-search-engine-for-android-apps.4578809/post-88973777> c. This is proof I communicated with Aurora & Skyica to make it work! <https://xdaforums.com/t/app-6-0-app-finder-the-most-advanced-search-engine-for-android-apps.4578809/post-89024201> Notice that *intelligent* people work together to solve difficult issues. Morons only complain they can't install the app because they're afraid. BTW, if just a few of the intelligent people here use it, I will have fulfilled my generously kind-hearted goal of informing people of not only one of the best free apps on Android, but the best app finder bar none. That's what makes me happy. -- (Responding to people who wish to remain stupid is not what I like to do.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-03 16:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <lr8n3lF330nU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #144787 |
Andrew, 2024-12-03 03:06: > Arno Welzel wrote on Mon, 2 Dec 2024 23:54:35 +0100 : > >>> Why do people use just about the dumbest possible search engine instead? >> >> Because they don't know better. > > Yes. You're the only one who knows the answer to that question, which is > what I'm actually trying to "fix" in my kind-hearted way on this newsgroup. > <https://skyica.com/appfinder/features/> Do you get paid for this? This app is not for free. -- Arno Welzel https://arnowelzel.de
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-03 16:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vinfps.er4.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #144818 |
Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> wrote: > Andrew, 2024-12-03 03:06: > > > Arno Welzel wrote on Mon, 2 Dec 2024 23:54:35 +0100 : > > > >>> Why do people use just about the dumbest possible search engine instead? > >> > >> Because they don't know better. > > > > Yes. You're the only one who knows the answer to that question, which is > > what I'm actually trying to "fix" in my kind-hearted way on this newsgroup. > > <https://skyica.com/appfinder/features/> > > Do you get paid for this? This app is not for free. Well, the free one is. And as to the paid one: What's $40 between 'friends'!? :-) <https://skyica.com/appfinder/comparison/>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew <andys@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-04 05:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vionns$2se8$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #144824 |
Frank Slootweg wrote on 3 Dec 2024 16:40:22 GMT : >> Do you get paid for this? This app is not for free. > > Well, the free one is. In hindsight, it seems only Frank understood a single thing about this app, where what I learned is that most people are so afraid of a non-Google app that they (almost literally) leave puddles of piss on the floor in their quivering fear. I'm saying that in a very glaringly low-level but extremely obvious way that the fear that people like Carlos and Vanguard feel about apps not from Google is so strong that they actually give me credit for convincing them the app is too dangerous for them. I find that interesting. They piss in their pants just hearing about apps not from Google. And then they blame me for them pissing in their pants out of fear. WTF? They're afraid. But they can't admit that they're afraid. They leave puddles of piss on the floor - which shows clearly they're afraid. But they can't admit it. So Vanguard came up with a whole plethora of insane excuses for what he just should have said scares him so much that he peed in his pants at the mere mention of loading a non-Google app to search for Google apps. Likewise with Carlos - who - get this - blamed ME! for his puddles of piss on the floor - when it's really that Carlos is as quiveringly scared as Vanguard was. Who is that afraid of an app that they piss all over themselves at the mere mention of loading an app that isn't from Google to search Google's repo? I learned a lot about the people on this newsgroup. Mostly that they're afraid of everything. It's time for them to clean up their piss on the floor and move to the next thread as it's disgusting to me how fearful these people are of a simple app. They blame me for their fears. They blame me because they pissed in their pants. At the mere mention of an app that isn't from Google to search for apps that are from Google. That's actually kind of funny when you think about that is what happened.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-04 12:57 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ams52lxod6.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #144861 |
On 2024-12-04 06:01, Andrew wrote: > Frank Slootweg wrote on 3 Dec 2024 16:40:22 GMT : > >>> Do you get paid for this? This app is not for free. >> >> Well, the free one is. > > In hindsight, it seems only Frank understood a single thing about this app, > where what I learned is that most people are so afraid of a non-Google app > that they (almost literally) leave puddles of piss on the floor in their > quivering fear. > > I'm saying that in a very glaringly low-level but extremely obvious way > that the fear that people like Carlos and Vanguard feel about apps not from > Google is so strong that they actually give me credit for convincing them > the app is too dangerous for them. > > I find that interesting. > > They piss in their pants just hearing about apps not from Google. > And then they blame me for them pissing in their pants out of fear. > > WTF? > > They're afraid. But they can't admit that they're afraid. They leave > puddles of piss on the floor - which shows clearly they're > afraid. Arlen, that you are so intense in praising that tool, trying to convince us, and even insulting us if we are not convinced, is enough to put me away from trying the tool. -- Cheers, Carlos.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-04 13:05 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <ute1yp1n6l5z$.dlg@v.nguard.lh> |
| In reply to | #144881 |
"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > On 2024-12-04 06:01, Andrew wrote: >> Frank Slootweg wrote on 3 Dec 2024 16:40:22 GMT : >> >>>> Do you get paid for this? This app is not for free. >>> >>> Well, the free one is. >> >> In hindsight, it seems only Frank understood a single thing about this app, >> where what I learned is that most people are so afraid of a non-Google app >> that they (almost literally) leave puddles of piss on the floor in their >> quivering fear. >> >> I'm saying that in a very glaringly low-level but extremely obvious way >> that the fear that people like Carlos and Vanguard feel about apps not from >> Google is so strong that they actually give me credit for convincing them >> the app is too dangerous for them. >> >> I find that interesting. >> >> They piss in their pants just hearing about apps not from Google. >> And then they blame me for them pissing in their pants out of fear. >> >> WTF? >> >> They're afraid. But they can't admit that they're afraid. They leave >> puddles of piss on the floor - which shows clearly they're >> afraid. > > Arlen, that you are so intense in praising that tool, trying to convince > us, and even insulting us if we are not convinced, is enough to put me > away from trying the tool. He can't help himself. Like Alan Conner, if you agreee with him then you are a saint, but if you don't agree with him then you are the spawn of Satan, and must be stupid and fearful spawn because you don't agree.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew <andys@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-05 06:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <virhvn$1s33$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #144903 |
VanguardLH wrote on Wed, 4 Dec 2024 13:05:05 -0600 : > He can't help himself. Like Alan Conner, if you agreee with him then > you are a saint, but if you don't agree with him then you are the spawn > of Satan, and must be stupid and fearful spawn because you don't agree. What you do not understand is I agree with ANYONE who makes a valid point. And I disagree with ANYONE who fabricates inane excuses for their fears. You spent hours fabricating absurdly ridiculous excuses for why you couldn't install the Aurora APK also, Vanguard. You think I forget? Face it. You're *A-F-R-A-I-D*. And that's OK. But don't blame me for your insanely abnormal personal fears of an APK. Stop blaming me for your own personal problems, Vanguard. Be a man.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew <andys@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-04 04:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vion7r$2cp9$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #144818 |
Arno Welzel wrote on Tue, 3 Dec 2024 16:40:39 +0100 : >> Arno Welzel wrote on Mon, 2 Dec 2024 23:54:35 +0100 : >> >>>> Why do people use just about the dumbest possible search engine instead? >>> >>> Because they don't know better. >> >> Yes. You're the only one who knows the answer to that question, which is >> what I'm actually trying to "fix" in my kind-hearted way on this newsgroup. >> <https://skyica.com/appfinder/features/> > > Do you get paid for this? This app is not for free. That's an odd thought process... very strange... almost incomprehensible... It's kind of like saying the Google Play Store OSMAnd app costs money so you won't install the free F-Droid OSMAnd app - which is the same app. The thought process of people who say such things boggles my mind...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-04 13:41 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nhg1hz4jpaqg.dlg@v.nguard.lh> |
| In reply to | #144860 |
Andrew <andys@nospam.com> wrote: > Arno Welzel wrote on Tue, 3 Dec 2024 16:40:39 +0100 : > >>> Arno Welzel wrote on Mon, 2 Dec 2024 23:54:35 +0100 : >>> >>>>> Why do people use just about the dumbest possible search engine instead? >>>> >>>> Because they don't know better. >>> >>> Yes. You're the only one who knows the answer to that question, which is >>> what I'm actually trying to "fix" in my kind-hearted way on this newsgroup. >>> <https://skyica.com/appfinder/features/> >> >> Do you get paid for this? This app is not for free. > > That's an odd thought process... very strange... almost incomprehensible... > > It's kind of like saying the Google Play Store OSMAnd app costs money so > you won't install the free F-Droid OSMAnd app - which is the same app. > > The thought process of people who say such things boggles my mind... And there you go misleading again. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.osmand Yep, free. However, this one is payware: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.osmand.plus However, you said OSMand, not OSMand+. Yet Fdroid you claim offers the free (non-plus) version is instead proliferating the plus paid version that you tout as free. In a search on "osmand" at Fdroid, the only match in their search was: https://f-droid.org/en/packages/net.osmand.plus/ That looks to be the OSMand+ version, but they substituted ~ for + in the product name yet "plus" is in the URL path. Read carefully that Fdroid app page which notes: Anti-Features (i.e., features you do NOT want for freeware) - This app contains non-free assets - This app promotes or depends entirely on a non-free network service Yes, Fdroid carries the app, but also notes it is NOT a free app. Nope, I don't need to install it to check free versus paid. I trust Fdroid more than you. You said OSMand (no plus sign). You also said it's at Fdroid. That's OSMand+. Sorry, I cannot address why Fdroid doesn't carry OSMand non-plus (free) since their About page claims "F-Droid is an installable catalogue of FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) applications for the Android platform." Seems contradictory that Fdroid carries OSMand+ instead of OSMand, but you claimed the one at Fdroid was free. Free download does not mandate free software. Tis disappointing Fdroid is pushing payware, and then caveats the app with anti-features. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OsmAnd "It is available in both free and paid versions; the latter unlocks the download limit for offline maps and provides access to Wikipedia points of interest (POIs) and their descriptions from within the app." There is a download limit for offline maps in Google Maps? Or in the Here [WeGo] app? Gee, I never got charged for all those offline maps I stored on my SD card using those map apps. The comment about lack of POIs (Points of Interest) is one of the reasons my trial of OSMand (free non-plus) ceased. That along with them using county plats that did not match reality since those show road proposed changes or additions that have not yet occurred. Plus crowdsourcing a database doesn't guarantee accuracy. Hmm, and I didn't have to pay for Google Maps or Here [WeGo], either. OpenStreetMaps (OSM), and the OSMand that accesses the OSM map database are valiant efforts indeed, but lost in my evaluation of it, and of alternatives all of which were free, and all of which were available at play.google.com.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew <andys@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-05 06:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <viri9m$2am6$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #144908 |
VanguardLH wrote on Wed, 4 Dec 2024 13:41:55 -0600 : > However, you said OSMand, not OSMand+. Yet Fdroid you claim offers the > free (non-plus) version is instead proliferating the plus paid version > that you tout as free. In a search on "osmand" at Fdroid, the only > match in their search was: > > https://f-droid.org/en/packages/net.osmand.plus/ > > That looks to be the OSMand+ version, but they substituted ~ for + in > the product name yet "plus" is in the URL path. Why are you repeating this? Everyone knows this. It's been discussed something like a thousand times on this newsgroup Vanguard. OSMAnd+ is what is on the Google Play Store repo OSMAnd~ is what is on the F-Droid repo Everyone knows that. I don't need to re-state it. Everyone knows it. > > Read carefully that Fdroid app page which notes: > Anti-Features (i.e., features you do NOT want for freeware) > - This app contains non-free assets > - This app promotes or depends entirely on a non-free network service > > Yes, Fdroid carries the app, but also notes it is NOT a free app. Nope, > I don't need to install it to check free versus paid. I trust Fdroid > more than you. You said OSMand (no plus sign). You also said it's at > Fdroid. That's OSMand+. Sorry, I cannot address why Fdroid doesn't > carry OSMand non-plus (free) since their About page claims "F-Droid is > an installable catalogue of FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) > applications for the Android platform." Seems contradictory that Fdroid > carries OSMand+ instead of OSMand, but you claimed the one at Fdroid was > free. Free download does not mandate free software. Tis disappointing > Fdroid is pushing payware, and then caveats the app with anti-features. Every word you (and Carlos) write is about your abject fears of APKs. And that's fine. You're welcome to spend hours fabricating reasons for why you fear an APK. Just don't blame me for your abject fears of something as simple as an APK. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OsmAnd > "It is available in both free and paid versions; the latter unlocks the > download limit for offline maps and provides access to Wikipedia points > of interest (POIs) and their descriptions from within the app." > > There is a download limit for offline maps in Google Maps? Or in the > Here [WeGo] app? Gee, I never got charged for all those offline maps I > stored on my SD card using those map apps. The comment about lack of > POIs (Points of Interest) is one of the reasons my trial of OSMand (free > non-plus) ceased. That along with them using county plats that did not > match reality since those show road proposed changes or additions that > have not yet occurred. Plus crowdsourcing a database doesn't guarantee > accuracy. Hmm, and I didn't have to pay for Google Maps or Here [WeGo], > either. OpenStreetMaps (OSM), and the OSMand that accesses the OSM map > database are valiant efforts indeed, but lost in my evaluation of it, > and of alternatives all of which were free, and all of which were > available at play.google.com. You spend hours justifying your abject fears of something as simple as an app, which is clear by your fabrications of why you can't install that app. Instead of spending hours justifying your fears of an app, why don't you just download the app, test it out, and let us know how it works for you? That's what I do.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-05 09:11 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <zhgip1lp18c7$.dlg@v.nguard.lh> |
| In reply to | #144928 |
Andrew <andys@nospam.com> wrote: > VanguardLH wrote on Wed, 4 Dec 2024 13:41:55 -0600 : > >> However, you said OSMand, not OSMand+. Yet Fdroid you claim offers the >> free (non-plus) version is instead proliferating the plus paid version >> that you tout as free. In a search on "osmand" at Fdroid, the only >> match in their search was: >> >> https://f-droid.org/en/packages/net.osmand.plus/ >> >> That looks to be the OSMand+ version, but they substituted ~ for + in >> the product name yet "plus" is in the URL path. > > Why are you repeating this? Everyone knows this. It's been discussed > something like a thousand times on this newsgroup Vanguard. Provide 100 MIDs for those claimed "thousands" of prior discussions.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web