Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #73228 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-01-09 10:11 +0000 |
| Last post | 2021-01-10 10:58 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 391 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 10:11 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Dieter Britz <dieterhansbritz@gmail.com> - 2021-01-09 13:01 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-09 08:16 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 09:34 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-09 12:35 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 11:09 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:49 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:34 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-09 12:41 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 17:47 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-09 14:29 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-09 12:56 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-09 21:29 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 21:03 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:24 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2021-01-09 08:58 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:27 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-09 12:38 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 09:12 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2021-01-09 18:03 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 12:16 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:53 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-10 11:45 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 14:03 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 09:54 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 17:02 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 12:26 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 12:20 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 15:20 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 23:29 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 10:38 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 17:40 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 12:52 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 20:08 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 14:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 13:51 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 05:45 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 09:38 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 03:26 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 19:56 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 07:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-14 10:15 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-14 18:42 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 16:39 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2021-01-11 09:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-11 10:27 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 22:44 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 19:00 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-11 10:27 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-11 17:51 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 13:33 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 08:40 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 20:22 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 10:53 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 18:01 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 12:59 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 20:08 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 14:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 20:19 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 15:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-12 22:51 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-13 02:36 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-13 16:19 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 10:56 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-11 16:34 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-11 10:35 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-11 19:24 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 04:39 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:39 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:29 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Dieter Britz <dieterhansbritz@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:38 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-10 08:55 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 15:41 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 21:48 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-10 19:47 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-11 15:22 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 13:35 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 10:05 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-11 16:20 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-11 13:05 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-11 18:15 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 21:48 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 10:13 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 15:23 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 15:47 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-12 13:11 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-12 15:02 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-12 15:17 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 10:19 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-12 08:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-12 13:41 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 05:51 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people KenW <ken1943@invalid.net> - 2021-01-12 15:58 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-12 18:15 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 07:46 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 21:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-13 02:36 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 14:31 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-12 14:47 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 15:26 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 19:46 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-01-13 08:07 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 08:37 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-13 12:31 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:49 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 11:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-13 16:07 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 18:57 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 21:39 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 22:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 06:02 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 21:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-18 09:10 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 08:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:06 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 12:51 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 09:58 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-18 18:24 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-20 00:18 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-18 18:23 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 14:14 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 13:21 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:42 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 16:16 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 09:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 14:23 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 14:21 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 10:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 15:27 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:13 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:27 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 13:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 15:46 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 09:19 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 13:03 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:25 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 13:38 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-20 21:44 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:44 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-21 19:19 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 11:39 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:52 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:55 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:48 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 22:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:50 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 15:30 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-20 21:46 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:48 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-21 19:20 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 08:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:59 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 15:19 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 16:35 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:40 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 14:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 16:17 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 14:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 17:46 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 10:23 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:42 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 14:20 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 17:46 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 10:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 15:28 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:28 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:47 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Leo <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2021-01-18 20:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 20:42 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 17:45 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:18 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-20 00:28 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 23:42 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 17:43 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-19 11:24 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 05:39 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 08:07 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 19:33 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 11:35 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 15:37 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 14:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 14:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 19:54 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 20:00 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:33 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-21 05:46 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 03:05 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 10:29 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:44 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:00 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:20 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:35 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 10:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:13 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-21 17:27 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:48 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 15:04 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 10:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 19:25 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 14:33 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 11:57 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:20 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 19:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 19:28 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 20:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 22:09 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 12:01 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:25 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 14:29 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 19:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 15:02 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 11:50 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 12:01 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:31 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:47 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-22 10:06 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 09:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 10:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:36 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 13:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:08 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:35 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 11:43 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:46 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 03:02 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:23 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-21 06:06 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:42 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:15 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:47 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 12:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:04 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:20 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:53 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:19 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 19:59 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 15:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 10:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:33 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 07:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 10:33 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 09:27 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 21:20 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 15:46 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 14:12 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:52 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:24 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:44 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:55 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 17:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 12:54 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:07 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:41 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 19:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:32 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 13:09 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 12:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 15:19 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 14:46 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-13 16:14 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:53 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 16:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 22:19 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 14:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-13 13:49 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 13:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:40 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 08:15 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Hergen Lehmann <hlehmann.expires.5-11@snafu.de> - 2021-01-13 22:09 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-13 20:17 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bernd Froehlich <befr@eaglesoft.de> - 2021-01-14 08:02 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 09:43 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-14 07:49 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-14 14:43 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-14 23:53 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 12:15 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 14:34 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 21:28 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-14 17:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 23:02 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 19:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 12:17 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:50 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 13:17 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:34 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:10 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:21 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 13:37 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:41 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:23 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:43 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:51 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:54 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 12:50 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:21 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:13 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 19:50 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-15 06:39 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 18:38 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-15 22:29 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 16:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-15 08:28 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 18:42 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-15 22:29 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 16:16 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-15 21:37 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 17:24 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-15 23:00 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 19:29 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 01:04 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 20:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 11:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 08:48 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 14:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 10:24 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 15:43 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 13:25 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 19:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 16:31 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 23:57 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 19:21 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-17 13:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-17 16:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 11:54 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 13:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:44 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2021-01-16 09:59 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 21:08 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 09:08 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2021-01-16 02:49 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 04:51 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 12:07 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 08:37 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 14:01 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:59 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 13:07 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-18 12:24 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:43 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-16 16:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-15 07:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 03:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-15 11:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 08:07 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 13:06 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 04:16 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-12 22:27 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 11:16 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-13 02:36 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:13 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 15:19 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 07:53 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 13:35 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:58 +0000
Page 11 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 20 Next page →
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 10:29 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ruch6m$5v6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73931 |
On 2021-01-21 8:05 a.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > > "sms" <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in message > news:ruc0ki$t8o$1@dont-email.me... >> On 1/21/2021 12:33 AM, Chris wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >>> Oh boo-hoo! Poor little rich girl! She knew exactly what she was >>> getting by >>> marrying that creep. The real victim is his son, he won't be getting any >>> love or care from his vain and self-centred parents. > >> Exactly. She knew what she was getting into when she married him. It >> was a good deal for her, financially. You're right, the victim is Barron. > > Nope, he's doing fine. > >> We can hope that he will not turn out like Trump's other children, but >> it may be a vain hope. > > Nope, he already isnt anything like them. > >>> Literally everything you believe that Trump told you is a lie. >> >> Trump's core belief: "It's morally wrong to allow a sucker to keep his >> money." > > Still did a hell of a lot better than any other > prez in Syria, even than Ike and Vietnam. Again, in specifics, what did Trump do that was so much "better than any other prez"? And before you answer: '“What Syria withdrawal? There was never a Syria withdrawal,” Jeffrey said. “When the situation in northeast Syria had been fairly stable after we defeated ISIS, [Trump] was inclined to pull out. In each case, we then decided to come up with five better arguments for why we needed to stay. And we succeeded both times. That’s the story.”' <https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2020/11/outgoing-syria-envoy-admits-hiding-us-troop-numbers-praises-trumps-mideast-record/170012/>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-22 07:44 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6u7dhF4ohiU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73943 |
Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote > Rod Speed wrote >> sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote >>> Chris wrote >>>> Oh boo-hoo! Poor little rich girl! She knew exactly what she was >>>> getting by marrying that creep. The real victim is his son, he won't be >>>> getting any >>>> love or care from his vain and self-centred parents. >>> Exactly. She knew what she was getting into when she married him. It was >>> a good deal for her, financially. Yep, and not just financially either. >>> You're right, the victim is Barron. >> Nope, he's doing fine. >>> We can hope that he will not turn out like Trump's other children, but >>> it may be a vain hope. >> Nope, he already isnt anything like them. >>>> Literally everything you believe that Trump told you is a lie. >>> Trump's core belief: "It's morally wrong to allow a sucker to keep his >>> money." >> Still did a hell of a lot better than any other >> prez in Syria, even than Ike and Vietnam. > Again, in specifics, what did Trump do that was so much "better than any > other prez"? I just told you, Syria. > And before you answer: > '“What Syria withdrawal? There was never a Syria withdrawal,” Jeffrey > said. “When the situation in northeast Syria had been fairly stable after > we defeated ISIS, Something none of the other prez managed even with Panama and Grenada, let alone Beirut, Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Somalia, etc etc etc. > [Trump] was inclined to pull out. In each case, we then decided to come up > with five better arguments for why we needed to stay. In fact the USA isnt in Syria anymore. > And we succeeded both times. That’s the story.”' Nope, a very selective version of it. > <https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2020/11/outgoing-syria-envoy-admits-hiding-us-troop-numbers-praises-trumps-mideast-record/170012/>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 14:00 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ructie$v4r$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73950 |
On 2021-01-21 12:44 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote >> Rod Speed wrote >>> sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote >>>> Chris wrote > >>>>> Oh boo-hoo! Poor little rich girl! She knew exactly what she was >>>>> getting by marrying that creep. The real victim is his son, he >>>>> won't be getting any >>>>> love or care from his vain and self-centred parents. > >>>> Exactly. She knew what she was getting into when she married him. It >>>> was a good deal for her, financially. > > Yep, and not just financially either. > >>>> You're right, the victim is Barron. > >>> Nope, he's doing fine. > >>>> We can hope that he will not turn out like Trump's other children, >>>> but it may be a vain hope. > >>> Nope, he already isnt anything like them. > >>>>> Literally everything you believe that Trump told you is a lie. > >>>> Trump's core belief: "It's morally wrong to allow a sucker to keep >>>> his money." > >>> Still did a hell of a lot better than any other >>> prez in Syria, even than Ike and Vietnam. > >> Again, in specifics, what did Trump do that was so much "better than >> any other prez"? > > I just told you, Syria. > >> And before you answer: > >> '“What Syria withdrawal? There was never a Syria withdrawal,” Jeffrey >> said. “When the situation in northeast Syria had been fairly stable >> after we defeated ISIS, > > Something none of the other prez managed even > with Panama and Grenada, let alone Beirut, Iraq, > Afghanistan, Vietnam, Somalia, etc etc etc. > >> [Trump] was inclined to pull out. In each case, we then decided to >> come up with five better arguments for why we needed to stay. > > In fact the USA isnt in Syria anymore. In fact... ...(and as usual)... ...you're wrong. Because if the USA wasn't currently there, then Syria could be demanding... ...in the last 24 hours... ...the withdrawal of US forces. Which they are. > >> And we succeeded both times. That’s the story.”' > > Nope, a very selective version of it. And what about that makes it untrue? > >> <https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2020/11/outgoing-syria-envoy-admits-hiding-us-troop-numbers-praises-trumps-mideast-record/170012/> > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-22 09:20 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6ud1cF5qsgU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73959 |
Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote > Rod Speed wrote >> Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote >>> Rod Speed wrote >>>> sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote >>>>> Chris wrote >>>>>> Oh boo-hoo! Poor little rich girl! She knew exactly what she was >>>>>> getting by marrying that creep. The real victim is his son, he won't >>>>>> be getting any >>>>>> love or care from his vain and self-centred parents. >> >>>>> Exactly. She knew what she was getting into when she married him. It >>>>> was a good deal for her, financially. >> >> Yep, and not just financially either. >> >>>>> You're right, the victim is Barron. >> >>>> Nope, he's doing fine. >> >>>>> We can hope that he will not turn out like Trump's other children, but >>>>> it may be a vain hope. >> >>>> Nope, he already isnt anything like them. >> >>>>>> Literally everything you believe that Trump told you is a lie. >> >>>>> Trump's core belief: "It's morally wrong to allow a sucker to keep his >>>>> money." >> >>>> Still did a hell of a lot better than any other >>>> prez in Syria, even than Ike and Vietnam. >> >>> Again, in specifics, what did Trump do that was so much "better than any >>> other prez"? >> >> I just told you, Syria. >> >>> And before you answer: >> >>> '“What Syria withdrawal? There was never a Syria withdrawal,” Jeffrey >>> said. “When the situation in northeast Syria had been fairly stable >>> after we defeated ISIS, >> >> Something none of the other prez managed even >> with Panama and Grenada, let alone Beirut, Iraq, >> Afghanistan, Vietnam, Somalia, etc etc etc. >> >>> [Trump] was inclined to pull out. In each case, we then decided to come >>> up with five better arguments for why we needed to stay. >> >> In fact the USA isnt in Syria anymore. > > In fact... > > ...(and as usual)... > > ...you're wrong. Nope. > Because if the USA wasn't currently there, It isnt in Syria. > then Syria could be demanding... > ...in the last 24 hours... > > ...the withdrawal of US forces. > > Which they are. Bullshit they are. >>> And we succeeded both times. That’s the story.”' >> >> Nope, a very selective version of it. > > And what about that makes it untrue? The stupid line that the USA still has troops in Syria. >>> <https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2020/11/outgoing-syria-envoy-admits-hiding-us-troop-numbers-praises-trumps-mideast-record/170012/>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 14:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rucvj3$cnd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73966 |
On 2021-01-21 2:20 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote >> Rod Speed wrote >>> Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote >>>> Rod Speed wrote >>>>> sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote >>>>>> Chris wrote > >>>>>>> Oh boo-hoo! Poor little rich girl! She knew exactly what she was >>>>>>> getting by marrying that creep. The real victim is his son, he >>>>>>> won't be getting any >>>>>>> love or care from his vain and self-centred parents. >>> >>>>>> Exactly. She knew what she was getting into when she married him. >>>>>> It was a good deal for her, financially. >>> >>> Yep, and not just financially either. >>> >>>>>> You're right, the victim is Barron. >>> >>>>> Nope, he's doing fine. >>> >>>>>> We can hope that he will not turn out like Trump's other children, >>>>>> but it may be a vain hope. >>> >>>>> Nope, he already isnt anything like them. >>> >>>>>>> Literally everything you believe that Trump told you is a lie. >>> >>>>>> Trump's core belief: "It's morally wrong to allow a sucker to keep >>>>>> his money." >>> >>>>> Still did a hell of a lot better than any other >>>>> prez in Syria, even than Ike and Vietnam. >>> >>>> Again, in specifics, what did Trump do that was so much "better than >>>> any other prez"? >>> >>> I just told you, Syria. >>> >>>> And before you answer: >>> >>>> '“What Syria withdrawal? There was never a Syria withdrawal,” >>>> Jeffrey said. “When the situation in northeast Syria had been fairly >>>> stable after we defeated ISIS, >>> >>> Something none of the other prez managed even >>> with Panama and Grenada, let alone Beirut, Iraq, >>> Afghanistan, Vietnam, Somalia, etc etc etc. >>> >>>> [Trump] was inclined to pull out. In each case, we then decided to >>>> come up with five better arguments for why we needed to stay. >>> >>> In fact the USA isnt in Syria anymore. >> >> In fact... >> >> ...(and as usual)... >> >> ...you're wrong. > > Nope. > >> Because if the USA wasn't currently there, > > It isnt in Syria. > >> then Syria could be demanding... > >> ...in the last 24 hours... >> >> ...the withdrawal of US forces. >> >> Which they are. > > Bullshit they are. You really did drink the entire punchbowl, sunshine! 'Damascus, Jan 21 : The Syrian government has demanded the “immediate and unconditional withdrawal” of US forces from the war-torn country due to their “hostile practices”. In a statement issued on Wednesday the Foreign Ministry condemned what it called the “hostile practices” of the US forces in northeastern Syria, reports Xinhua news agency. It accused the US forces of “systematic theft” of oil and agriculture resources in northern Syrian in addition to bringing in military reinforcement to that part of the country. The former administration of President Donald Trump has destabilised the region and supported separatist movements in a bid to divide Syria and prevent reaching a political solution through supporting the “terrorist groups”, the Ministry claimed.' <https://www.siasat.com/syria-demands-immediate-withdrawal-of-us-forces-2072422/> 'Trump says the US is “out of Syria.” But more US troops are heading there. About 100 US service members are going to northeast Syria to defend against Russian aggression. Despite President Donald Trump’s clear desire to withdraw US troops from Syria and improve ties with Russia, the Pentagon will imminently send around 100 more service members to the war-torn nation to better confront Moscow’s forces.' <https://www.vox.com/2020/9/21/21448845/syria-russia-usa-troops-trump> Note that that says "100 MORE service members", sunshine. And the article goes on: 'The decision comes just a month after seven US service members suffered concussions during a skirmish with a Russian convoy that wasn’t expected in the area. The altercation clearly moved the Defense Department to provide reinforcements for the roughly 500 US troops still in Syria as part of a global coalition to defeat ISIS.' Oh! You'll get your panties in a bunch because the link is to a Vox.com article, won't you? OK. <https://apnews.com/article/islamic-state-group-united-states-archive-russia-8c0209aa0d83ed130fb2edc560b012bf> Still not enough, sunshine? 'Hundreds of U.S. troops are stationed in northeastern Syria, working with their local partners from the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces to fight against the Islamic State group.' <https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-defense-in-syria-isis-threat> > >>>> And we succeeded both times. That’s the story.”' >>> >>> Nope, a very selective version of it. >> >> And what about that makes it untrue? > > The stupid line that the USA still has troops in Syria. You're really not good at this. That doesn't match with your initial statement about that article at ALL, sunshine. > >>>> <https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2020/11/outgoing-syria-envoy-admits-hiding-us-troop-numbers-praises-trumps-mideast-record/170012/> >>>> > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-22 10:01 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6uffbF68ioU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73971 |
"Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message news:rucvj3$cnd$1@dont-email.me... > On 2021-01-21 2:20 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >> Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote >>> Rod Speed wrote >>>> Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote >>>>> Rod Speed wrote >>>>>> sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote >>>>>>> Chris wrote >> >>>>>>>> Oh boo-hoo! Poor little rich girl! She knew exactly what she was >>>>>>>> getting by marrying that creep. The real victim is his son, he >>>>>>>> won't be getting any >>>>>>>> love or care from his vain and self-centred parents. >>>> >>>>>>> Exactly. She knew what she was getting into when she married him. It >>>>>>> was a good deal for her, financially. >>>> >>>> Yep, and not just financially either. >>>> >>>>>>> You're right, the victim is Barron. >>>> >>>>>> Nope, he's doing fine. >>>> >>>>>>> We can hope that he will not turn out like Trump's other children, >>>>>>> but it may be a vain hope. >>>> >>>>>> Nope, he already isnt anything like them. >>>> >>>>>>>> Literally everything you believe that Trump told you is a lie. >>>> >>>>>>> Trump's core belief: "It's morally wrong to allow a sucker to keep >>>>>>> his money." >>>> >>>>>> Still did a hell of a lot better than any other >>>>>> prez in Syria, even than Ike and Vietnam. >>>> >>>>> Again, in specifics, what did Trump do that was so much "better than >>>>> any other prez"? >>>> >>>> I just told you, Syria. >>>> >>>>> And before you answer: >>>> >>>>> '“What Syria withdrawal? There was never a Syria withdrawal,” Jeffrey >>>>> said. “When the situation in northeast Syria had been fairly stable >>>>> after we defeated ISIS, >>>> >>>> Something none of the other prez managed even >>>> with Panama and Grenada, let alone Beirut, Iraq, >>>> Afghanistan, Vietnam, Somalia, etc etc etc. >>>> >>>>> [Trump] was inclined to pull out. In each case, we then decided to >>>>> come up with five better arguments for why we needed to stay. >>>> >>>> In fact the USA isnt in Syria anymore. >>> >>> In fact... >>> >>> ...(and as usual)... >>> >>> ...you're wrong. >> >> Nope. >> >>> Because if the USA wasn't currently there, >> >> It isnt in Syria. >> >>> then Syria could be demanding... >> >>> ...in the last 24 hours... >>> >>> ...the withdrawal of US forces. >>> >>> Which they are. >> >> Bullshit they are. > > You really did drink the entire punchbowl, sunshine! We'll see, shitshine... > 'Damascus, Jan 21 : The Syrian government has demanded the “immediate and > unconditional withdrawal” of US forces from the war-torn country due to > their “hostile practices”. > In a statement issued on Wednesday the Foreign Ministry condemned what it > called the “hostile practices” of the US forces in northeastern Syria, > reports Xinhua news agency. Wota stunningly impeccable and impartial source. > It accused the US forces of “systematic theft” of oil and agriculture > resources in northern Syrian in addition to bringing in military > reinforcement to that part of the country. China claims it said that, anyway. > The former administration of President Donald Trump has destabilised the > region and supported separatist movements in a bid to divide Syria and > prevent reaching a political solution through supporting the “terrorist > groups”, the Ministry claimed.' China claims it said that, anyway. > <https://www.siasat.com/syria-demands-immediate-withdrawal-of-us-forces-2072422/> > 'Trump says the US is “out of Syria.” But more US troops are heading > there. Bullshit they are. > About 100 US service members are going to northeast Syria to defend > against Russian aggression. Not now they arent. > Despite President Donald Trump’s clear desire to withdraw US troops from > Syria and improve ties with Russia, the Pentagon will imminently send > around 100 more service members to the war-torn nation to better confront > Moscow’s forces.' > <https://www.vox.com/2020/9/21/21448845/syria-russia-usa-troops-trump> Look at the date, fuckwit. > Note that that says "100 MORE service members", sunshine. Pity about the date, shitshine. > And the article goes on: > 'The decision comes just a month after seven US service members suffered > concussions during a skirmish with a Russian convoy that wasn’t expected > in the area. The altercation clearly moved the Defense Department to > provide reinforcements for the roughly 500 US troops still in Syria as > part of a global coalition to defeat ISIS.' Pity about the date, shitshine. > Oh! You'll get your panties in a bunch because the link is to a Vox.com > article, won't you? Nope, because of the date, shitshine. > OK. > <https://apnews.com/article/islamic-state-group-united-states-archive-russia-8c0209aa0d83ed130fb2edc560b012bf> Pity about the date, shitshine. > Still not enough, sunshine? > 'Hundreds of U.S. troops are stationed in northeastern Syria, working with > their local partners from the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces to > fight against the Islamic State group.' > <https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-defense-in-syria-isis-threat> Pity about the date, shitshine. >>>>> And we succeeded both times. That’s the story.”' >>>> >>>> Nope, a very selective version of it. >>> >>> And what about that makes it untrue? >> >> The stupid line that the USA still has troops in Syria. > > You're really not good at this. We'll see... > That doesn't match with your initial statement about that article at ALL, > sunshine. Wrong, as always. >>>>> <https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2020/11/outgoing-syria-envoy-admits-hiding-us-troop-numbers-praises-trumps-mideast-record/170012/>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 14:13 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rucua5$1sg$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73943 |
On 01/21/2021 10:29 AM, Alan Baker wrote:
> Again, in specifics, what did Trump do that was so much "better than any
> other prez"?
Well, he DIDN'T do all the shit that Biden is doing yesterday and today.
I approve of regularizing the DACA kids; the rest of it is harmful
bullshit.
--
Cheers, Bev
There's something wrong with my keyboard.
Whenever I type x I get x.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 17:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <210120211727349631%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #73965 |
In article <rucua5$1sg$4@dont-email.me>, The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Again, in specifics, what did Trump do that was so much "better than any > > other prez"? > > Well, he DIDN'T do all the shit that Biden is doing yesterday and today. that's why trump was such a big failure. he was all talk and no substance. at least biden is getting stuff done.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-22 09:48 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6ueljF6404U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73969 |
"nospam" <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:210120211727349631%nospam@nospam.invalid... > In article <rucua5$1sg$4@dont-email.me>, The Real Bev > <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > Again, in specifics, what did Trump do that was so much "better than >> > any >> > other prez"? >> >> Well, he DIDN'T do all the shit that Biden is doing yesterday and today. > > that's why trump was such a big failure. he was all talk and no > substance. at least biden is getting stuff done. Trump got Syria done, much better than any other prez except with Grenada and Panama.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 15:04 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rud198$ptd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73975 |
On 2021-01-21 2:48 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > > "nospam" <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote in message > news:210120211727349631%nospam@nospam.invalid... >> In article <rucua5$1sg$4@dont-email.me>, The Real Bev >> <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> > Again, in specifics, what did Trump do that was so much "better >>> than > any >>> > other prez"? >>> >>> Well, he DIDN'T do all the shit that Biden is doing yesterday and today. >> >> that's why trump was such a big failure. he was all talk and no >> substance. at least biden is getting stuff done. > > Trump got Syria done, much better than any > other prez except with Grenada and Panama. There are still US troops in Syria today, sunshine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-22 10:15 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6ug87F6d65U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73978 |
"Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message news:rud198$ptd$1@dont-email.me... > On 2021-01-21 2:48 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "nospam" <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote in message >> news:210120211727349631%nospam@nospam.invalid... >>> In article <rucua5$1sg$4@dont-email.me>, The Real Bev >>> <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> > Again, in specifics, what did Trump do that was so much "better >>>> than > any >>>> > other prez"? >>>> >>>> Well, he DIDN'T do all the shit that Biden is doing yesterday and >>>> today. >>> >>> that's why trump was such a big failure. he was all talk and no >>> substance. at least biden is getting stuff done. >> >> Trump got Syria done, much better than any >> other prez except with Grenada and Panama. > > There are still US troops in Syria today, sunshine. Wrong, as always and even if there was, and there isnt, still a fucking sight better result with ISIS than any other prez managed except with Granada and Panama.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 19:25 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rudgio$9k8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73979 |
On 2021-01-21 3:15 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > > "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message > news:rud198$ptd$1@dont-email.me... >> On 2021-01-21 2:48 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "nospam" <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:210120211727349631%nospam@nospam.invalid... >>>> In article <rucua5$1sg$4@dont-email.me>, The Real Bev >>>> <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> > Again, in specifics, what did Trump do that was so much "better >>>>> than > any >>>>> > other prez"? >>>>> >>>>> Well, he DIDN'T do all the shit that Biden is doing yesterday and >>>>> today. >>>> >>>> that's why trump was such a big failure. he was all talk and no >>>> substance. at least biden is getting stuff done. >>> >>> Trump got Syria done, much better than any >>> other prez except with Grenada and Panama. >> >> There are still US troops in Syria today, sunshine. > > Wrong, as always and even if there was, and there isnt, > still a fucking sight better result with ISIS than any other > prez managed except with Granada and Panama. First of all, it's "Grenada". Second, Grenada and Panama were pushovers. Third, I provided you a source from the US Department of Defense itself. I'm surprised you don't deal with being wrong better than this, sunshine; what with all the practice you get. :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-22 14:33 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6uvciF92dqU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73988 |
Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote > Rod Speed wrote >> Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote >>> Rod Speed wrote >>>> nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote >>>>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>> Again, in specifics, what did Trump do that was so much "better than >>>>>>> any other prez"? >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, he DIDN'T do all the shit that Biden is doing yesterday and >>>>>> today. >>>>> >>>>> that's why trump was such a big failure. he was all talk and no >>>>> substance. at least biden is getting stuff done. >>>> >>>> Trump got Syria done, much better than any >>>> other prez except with Grenada and Panama. >>> >>> There are still US troops in Syria today, sunshine. >> >> Wrong, as always and even if there was, and there isnt, >> still a fucking sight better result with ISIS than any other >> prez managed except with Grenada and Panama. > Grenada and Panama were pushovers. That’s why I excluded them from the list of useful things other presidents did. > I provided you a source from the US Department of Defense itself. Pity about the DATE on that. <reams of your shit any 3 year old could leave for dead flushed where it belongs>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-22 11:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rueej0$dpj$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73975 |
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "nospam" <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote in message > news:210120211727349631%nospam@nospam.invalid... >> In article <rucua5$1sg$4@dont-email.me>, The Real Bev >> <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>>> Again, in specifics, what did Trump do that was so much "better than >>>> any >>>> other prez"? >>> >>> Well, he DIDN'T do all the shit that Biden is doing yesterday and today. >> >> that's why trump was such a big failure. he was all talk and no >> substance. at least biden is getting stuff done. > > Trump got Syria done, much better than any > other prez except with Grenada and Panama. No he didn't. He simply pulled out and let the Kurds, Russians and the Syrian regime deal with it. While at the same time turning a blind eye to Assad's brutal suppression of his own people. That's not better. It's cowardice. He'd rather arse-lick dictators than stand up to them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-23 04:20 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i70fqrFi71tU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #74012 |
Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote > Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >> nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote >>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote >>>>> Again, in specifics, what did Trump do that >>>>> was so much "better than any other prez"? >>>> Well, he DIDN'T do all the shit that Biden is doing yesterday and >>>> today. >>> that's why trump was such a big failure. he was all talk >>> and no substance. at least biden is getting stuff done. >> Trump got Syria done, much better than any >> other prez except with Grenada and Panama. > No he didn't. He simply pulled out and let the > Kurds, Russians and the Syrian regime deal with it. You don’t have a fucking clue what was involved in Syria. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_Syrian_Civil_War > While at the same time turning a blind eye to > Assad's brutal suppression of his own people. He doesn’t get to decide how Assad operates. > That's not better. It's cowardice. Even sillier than you usually manage and that’s saying something. > He'd rather arse-lick dictators than stand up to them. Pity about the result with ISIS. A much better result than any other prez ever got, even Ike.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 14:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rucvkk$cnd$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73965 |
On 2021-01-21 2:13 p.m., The Real Bev wrote: > On 01/21/2021 10:29 AM, Alan Baker wrote: > >> Again, in specifics, what did Trump do that was so much "better than any >> other prez"? > > Well, he DIDN'T do all the shit that Biden is doing yesterday and today. > I approve of regularizing the DACA kids; the rest of it is harmful > bullshit. > Specifics... ...if you have the balls for it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 19:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rudghj$9fn$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73973 |
On 01/21/2021 02:36 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
> On 2021-01-21 2:13 p.m., The Real Bev wrote:
>> On 01/21/2021 10:29 AM, Alan Baker wrote:
>>
>>> Again, in specifics, what did Trump do that was so much "better than any
>>> other prez"?
>>
>> Well, he DIDN'T do all the shit that Biden is doing yesterday and today.
>> I approve of regularizing the DACA kids; the rest of it is harmful
>> bullshit.
>
> Specifics... ...if you have the balls for it.
I don't want immigration from ANYWHERE, especially countries whose
people seem to think that killing Americans is a good thing; we already
have too many people, especially low-skill people.
The Paris global warming thing is crap and we're well out of it.
Assuming that human-caused global warming/climate change is actually
happening, do you REALLY believe that anything the US can do can stop
it? King Canute was trying to prove a point, not show how powerful he was.
I'm pretty sure he intends to throw more federal money at California's
bullet train, which has been proven to be an expensive and unwanted
boondoggle.
Spending OUR money on stupid stuff is harmful. California should serve
as a warning, not a role model.
--
Cheers, Bev
Linux -- the ultimate freebie!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 19:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rudgo8$9k8$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73987 |
On 2021-01-21 7:24 p.m., The Real Bev wrote: > On 01/21/2021 02:36 PM, Alan Baker wrote: >> On 2021-01-21 2:13 p.m., The Real Bev wrote: >>> On 01/21/2021 10:29 AM, Alan Baker wrote: >>> >>>> Again, in specifics, what did Trump do that was so much "better than >>>> any >>>> other prez"? >>> >>> Well, he DIDN'T do all the shit that Biden is doing yesterday and today. >>> I approve of regularizing the DACA kids; the rest of it is harmful >>> bullshit. >> >> Specifics... ...if you have the balls for it. > > I don't want immigration from ANYWHERE, especially countries whose > people seem to think that killing Americans is a good thing; we already > have too many people, especially low-skill people. So you don't want something that Trump wasn't doing. Got it. > > The Paris global warming thing is crap and we're well out of it. And you know it's crap because... > Assuming that human-caused global warming/climate change is actually > happening, do you REALLY believe that anything the US can do can stop > it? King Canute was trying to prove a point, not show how powerful he was. > > I'm pretty sure he intends to throw more federal money at California's > bullet train, which has been proven to be an expensive and unwanted > boondoggle. "Pretty sure". That doesn't really match up with what "Biden is doing yesterday and today" > > Spending OUR money on stupid stuff is harmful. California should serve > as a warning, not a role model. But spending your money on multi-millionaires and huge corporations was such a great idea, was it?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 20:55 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rudlrn$hc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73990 |
On 01/21/2021 07:28 PM, Alan Baker wrote: > On 2021-01-21 7:24 p.m., The Real Bev wrote: >> On 01/21/2021 02:36 PM, Alan Baker wrote: >>> On 2021-01-21 2:13 p.m., The Real Bev wrote: >>>> On 01/21/2021 10:29 AM, Alan Baker wrote: >>>> >>>>> Again, in specifics, what did Trump do that was so much "better than >>>>> any >>>>> other prez"? >>>> >>>> Well, he DIDN'T do all the shit that Biden is doing yesterday and today. >>>> I approve of regularizing the DACA kids; the rest of it is harmful >>>> bullshit. >>> >>> Specifics... ...if you have the balls for it. >> >> I don't want immigration from ANYWHERE, especially countries whose >> people seem to think that killing Americans is a good thing; we already >> have too many people, especially low-skill people. So you agree with this? Good for you! > So you don't want something that Trump wasn't doing. > > Got it. That makes no sense. Sort of like "What is not required is forbidden..." >> The Paris global warming thing is crap and we're well out of it. > > And you know it's crap because... See next paragraph; apparently you missed it before. >> Assuming that human-caused global warming/climate change is actually >> happening, do you REALLY believe that anything the US can do can stop >> it? King Canute was trying to prove a point, not show how powerful he was. >> >> I'm pretty sure he intends to throw more federal money at California's >> bullet train, which has been proven to be an expensive and unwanted >> boondoggle. > > "Pretty sure". > > That doesn't really match up with what "Biden is doing yesterday and today" I just said that to be polite. While I have no inside information, I'm willing to bet ONE WHOLE DIME (my sucker bet) that that's what happens. >> Spending OUR money on stupid stuff is harmful. California should serve >> as a warning, not a role model. > > But spending your money on multi-millionaires and huge corporations was > such a great idea, was it? Did I say that? I'm still pissed because Our Benevolent Government killed off Fannie Mae, previously a nice safe widows-and-orphans investment. -- Cheers, Bev "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." -- P.J. O'Rourke
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 22:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rudq60$iok$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #74005 |
On 2021-01-21 8:55 p.m., The Real Bev wrote: > On 01/21/2021 07:28 PM, Alan Baker wrote: >> On 2021-01-21 7:24 p.m., The Real Bev wrote: >>> On 01/21/2021 02:36 PM, Alan Baker wrote: >>>> On 2021-01-21 2:13 p.m., The Real Bev wrote: >>>>> On 01/21/2021 10:29 AM, Alan Baker wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Again, in specifics, what did Trump do that was so much "better than >>>>>> any >>>>>> other prez"? >>>>> >>>>> Well, he DIDN'T do all the shit that Biden is doing yesterday and >>>>> today. >>>>> I approve of regularizing the DACA kids; the rest of it is harmful >>>>> bullshit. >>>> >>>> Specifics... ...if you have the balls for it. >>> >>> I don't want immigration from ANYWHERE, especially countries whose >>> people seem to think that killing Americans is a good thing; we already >>> have too many people, especially low-skill people. > > So you agree with this? Good for you! Nope. > >> So you don't want something that Trump wasn't doing. >> >> Got it. > > That makes no sense. Sort of like "What is not required is forbidden..." No. Your reply makes no sense. > >>> The Paris global warming thing is crap and we're well out of it. >> >> And you know it's crap because... > > See next paragraph; apparently you missed it before. Why? Where does it change what you said above? > >>> Assuming that human-caused global warming/climate change is actually >>> happening, do you REALLY believe that anything the US can do can stop >>> it? King Canute was trying to prove a point, not show how powerful he >>> was. So not only do you claim sufficient knowledge to state confidently that it's crap... ...you also know what can and cannot be done about it. Got it. >>> >>> I'm pretty sure he intends to throw more federal money at California's >>> bullet train, which has been proven to be an expensive and unwanted >>> boondoggle. >> >> "Pretty sure". >> >> That doesn't really match up with what "Biden is doing yesterday and >> today" > > I just said that to be polite. While I have no inside information, I'm > willing to bet ONE WHOLE DIME (my sucker bet) that that's what happens. Done. Accepted if you don't get the meaning. > >>> Spending OUR money on stupid stuff is harmful. California should serve >>> as a warning, not a role model. >> >> But spending your money on multi-millionaires and huge corporations was >> such a great idea, was it? > > Did I say that? Let me see your posts where you complained about it... ...ever. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web