Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #73228 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-01-09 10:11 +0000 |
| Last post | 2021-01-10 10:58 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 391 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 10:11 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Dieter Britz <dieterhansbritz@gmail.com> - 2021-01-09 13:01 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-09 08:16 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 09:34 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-09 12:35 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 11:09 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:49 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:34 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-09 12:41 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 17:47 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-09 14:29 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-09 12:56 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-09 21:29 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 21:03 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:24 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2021-01-09 08:58 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:27 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-09 12:38 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 09:12 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2021-01-09 18:03 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 12:16 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:53 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-10 11:45 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 14:03 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 09:54 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 17:02 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 12:26 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 12:20 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 15:20 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 23:29 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 10:38 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 17:40 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 12:52 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 20:08 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 14:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 13:51 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 05:45 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 09:38 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 03:26 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 19:56 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 07:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-14 10:15 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-14 18:42 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 16:39 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2021-01-11 09:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-11 10:27 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 22:44 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 19:00 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-11 10:27 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-11 17:51 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 13:33 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 08:40 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 20:22 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 10:53 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 18:01 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 12:59 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 20:08 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 14:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 20:19 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 15:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-12 22:51 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-13 02:36 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-13 16:19 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 10:56 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-11 16:34 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-11 10:35 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-11 19:24 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 04:39 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:39 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:29 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Dieter Britz <dieterhansbritz@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:38 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-10 08:55 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 15:41 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 21:48 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-10 19:47 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-11 15:22 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 13:35 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 10:05 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-11 16:20 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-11 13:05 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-11 18:15 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 21:48 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 10:13 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 15:23 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 15:47 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-12 13:11 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-12 15:02 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-12 15:17 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 10:19 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-12 08:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-12 13:41 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 05:51 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people KenW <ken1943@invalid.net> - 2021-01-12 15:58 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-12 18:15 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 07:46 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 21:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-13 02:36 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 14:31 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-12 14:47 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 15:26 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 19:46 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-01-13 08:07 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 08:37 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-13 12:31 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:49 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 11:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-13 16:07 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 18:57 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 21:39 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 22:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 06:02 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 21:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-18 09:10 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 08:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:06 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 12:51 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 09:58 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-18 18:24 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-20 00:18 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-18 18:23 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 14:14 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 13:21 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:42 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 16:16 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 09:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 14:23 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 14:21 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 10:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 15:27 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:13 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:27 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 13:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 15:46 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 09:19 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 13:03 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:25 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 13:38 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-20 21:44 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:44 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-21 19:19 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 11:39 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:52 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:55 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:48 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 22:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:50 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 15:30 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-20 21:46 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:48 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-21 19:20 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 08:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:59 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 15:19 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 16:35 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:40 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 14:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 16:17 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 14:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 17:46 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 10:23 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:42 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 14:20 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 17:46 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 10:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 15:28 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:28 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:47 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Leo <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2021-01-18 20:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 20:42 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 17:45 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:18 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-20 00:28 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 23:42 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 17:43 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-19 11:24 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 05:39 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 08:07 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 19:33 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 11:35 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 15:37 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 14:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 14:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 19:54 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 20:00 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:33 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-21 05:46 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 03:05 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 10:29 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:44 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:00 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:20 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:35 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 10:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:13 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-21 17:27 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:48 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 15:04 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 10:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 19:25 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 14:33 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 11:57 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:20 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 19:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 19:28 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 20:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 22:09 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 12:01 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:25 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 14:29 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 19:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 15:02 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 11:50 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 12:01 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:31 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:47 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-22 10:06 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 09:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 10:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:36 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 13:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:08 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:35 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 11:43 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:46 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 03:02 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:23 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-21 06:06 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:42 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:15 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:47 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 12:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:04 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:20 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:53 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:19 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 19:59 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 15:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 10:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:33 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 07:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 10:33 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 09:27 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 21:20 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 15:46 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 14:12 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:52 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:24 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:44 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:55 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 17:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 12:54 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:07 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:41 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 19:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:32 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 13:09 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 12:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 15:19 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 14:46 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-13 16:14 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:53 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 16:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 22:19 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 14:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-13 13:49 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 13:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:40 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 08:15 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Hergen Lehmann <hlehmann.expires.5-11@snafu.de> - 2021-01-13 22:09 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-13 20:17 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bernd Froehlich <befr@eaglesoft.de> - 2021-01-14 08:02 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 09:43 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-14 07:49 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-14 14:43 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-14 23:53 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 12:15 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 14:34 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 21:28 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-14 17:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 23:02 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 19:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 12:17 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:50 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 13:17 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:34 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:10 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:21 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 13:37 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:41 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:23 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:43 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:51 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:54 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 12:50 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:21 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:13 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 19:50 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-15 06:39 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 18:38 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-15 22:29 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 16:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-15 08:28 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 18:42 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-15 22:29 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 16:16 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-15 21:37 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 17:24 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-15 23:00 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 19:29 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 01:04 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 20:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 11:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 08:48 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 14:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 10:24 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 15:43 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 13:25 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 19:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 16:31 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 23:57 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 19:21 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-17 13:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-17 16:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 11:54 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 13:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:44 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2021-01-16 09:59 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 21:08 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 09:08 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2021-01-16 02:49 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 04:51 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 12:07 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 08:37 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 14:01 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:59 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 13:07 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-18 12:24 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:43 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-16 16:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-15 07:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 03:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-15 11:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 08:07 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 13:06 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 04:16 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-12 22:27 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 11:16 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-13 02:36 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:13 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 15:19 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 07:53 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 13:35 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:58 +0000
Page 17 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 Next page →
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-20 16:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ruah4m$e0o$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73866 |
On 2021-01-20 3:41 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > >>>>>> Isn't it strange how we need to wait for the autopsy when someone >>>>>> else declares a cause of death? >>>>> >>>>> Nope, nothing strange about that and we don’t need >>>>> to wait for the autopsy with the one that got shot. >>> >>>> You declared it a stroke... >>> >>> More of your lies, and since lies is all you can manage, >>> here goes the chain on your shit and lies. > >> You insisted that the fact he could get up and walk away was proof >> that it couldn't have been the attack at the capitol that killed him. > > More of your bare faced lies. > > You get that I can produce the actual quote... ...right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 11:23 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6rvsiFloorU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73873 |
"Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message news:ruah4m$e0o$2@dont-email.me... > On 2021-01-20 3:41 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >>>>>>> Isn't it strange how we need to wait for the autopsy when someone >>>>>>> else declares a cause of death? >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope, nothing strange about that and we don’t need >>>>>> to wait for the autopsy with the one that got shot. >>>> >>>>> You declared it a stroke... >>>> >>>> More of your lies, and since lies is all you can manage, >>>> here goes the chain on your shit and lies. >> >>> You insisted that the fact he could get up and walk away was proof that >>> it couldn't have been the attack at the capitol that killed him. >> >> More of your bare faced lies. > You get that I can produce the actual quote... > ...right? You actually present a very selective and flagrantly dishonest subset of what I actually said.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-20 16:43 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ruainj$k58$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73876 |
On 2021-01-20 4:23 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > > "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message > news:ruah4m$e0o$2@dont-email.me... >> On 2021-01-20 3:41 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>>> Isn't it strange how we need to wait for the autopsy when >>>>>>>> someone else declares a cause of death? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nope, nothing strange about that and we don’t need >>>>>>> to wait for the autopsy with the one that got shot. >>>>> >>>>>> You declared it a stroke... >>>>> >>>>> More of your lies, and since lies is all you can manage, >>>>> here goes the chain on your shit and lies. >>> >>>> You insisted that the fact he could get up and walk away was proof >>>> that it couldn't have been the attack at the capitol that killed him. >>> >>> More of your bare faced lies. > >> You get that I can produce the actual quote... > >> ...right? > > You actually present a very selective and flagrantly > dishonest subset of what I actually said. Really? Let's look: When someone said: 'and so far, directly or indirectly killed six people' You answered: 'Nope, not even one.' When I pointed out that a source YOU CHOSE said: 'Capitol Police officer Brian D. Sicknick died from injuries sustained in the riot.' You replied: 'But says that he died in his office after leaving the capitol. If he actually had had his head bashed in, he wouldn’t have been able to return to his office, he would have been in an ambulance or have been conveyed to an ER or would have died on the floor in the capitol.' So explain what part of the context is missing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 11:51 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6s1ggFm1f6U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73879 |
"Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message news:ruainj$k58$2@dont-email.me... > On 2021-01-20 4:23 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >> news:ruah4m$e0o$2@dont-email.me... >>> On 2021-01-20 3:41 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Isn't it strange how we need to wait for the autopsy when someone >>>>>>>>> else declares a cause of death? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nope, nothing strange about that and we don’t need >>>>>>>> to wait for the autopsy with the one that got shot. >>>>>> >>>>>>> You declared it a stroke... >>>>>> >>>>>> More of your lies, and since lies is all you can manage, >>>>>> here goes the chain on your shit and lies. >>>> >>>>> You insisted that the fact he could get up and walk away was proof >>>>> that it couldn't have been the attack at the capitol that killed him. >>>> >>>> More of your bare faced lies. >> >>> You get that I can produce the actual quote... >> >>> ...right? >> >> You actually present a very selective and flagrantly >> dishonest subset of what I actually said. > > Really? > > Let's look: Yeah, lets. > When I pointed out that a source YOU CHOSE said: > 'Capitol Police officer Brian D. Sicknick died from injuries sustained in > the riot.' You actually lied that he had his head bashed in. > You replied: > 'But says that he died in his office after leaving the capitol. > If he actually had had his head bashed in, he wouldn’t have > been able to return to his office, he would have been in an > ambulance or have been conveyed to an ER or would have > died on the floor in the capitol.' > So explain what part of the context is missing. Your stupid lie that he had his head bashed in, and where I said anything about proof of anything, Pinocchio.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-20 16:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ruajbd$k58$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73882 |
On 2021-01-20 4:51 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > > "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message > news:ruainj$k58$2@dont-email.me... >> On 2021-01-20 4:23 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>> news:ruah4m$e0o$2@dont-email.me... >>>> On 2021-01-20 3:41 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Isn't it strange how we need to wait for the autopsy when >>>>>>>>>> someone else declares a cause of death? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nope, nothing strange about that and we don’t need >>>>>>>>> to wait for the autopsy with the one that got shot. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You declared it a stroke... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> More of your lies, and since lies is all you can manage, >>>>>>> here goes the chain on your shit and lies. >>>>> >>>>>> You insisted that the fact he could get up and walk away was proof >>>>>> that it couldn't have been the attack at the capitol that killed him. >>>>> >>>>> More of your bare faced lies. >>> >>>> You get that I can produce the actual quote... >>> >>>> ...right? >>> >>> You actually present a very selective and flagrantly >>> dishonest subset of what I actually said. >> >> Really? >> >> Let's look: > > Yeah, lets. > >> When I pointed out that a source YOU CHOSE said: > >> 'Capitol Police officer Brian D. Sicknick died from injuries sustained >> in the riot.' > > You actually lied that he had his head bashed in. I used "hyperbole": you should look it up. > >> You replied: > >> 'But says that he died in his office after leaving the capitol. >> If he actually had had his head bashed in, he wouldn’t have >> been able to return to his office, he would have been in an >> ambulance or have been conveyed to an ER or would have >> died on the floor in the capitol.' > >> So explain what part of the context is missing. > > Your stupid lie that he had his head bashed in, and where > I said anything about proof of anything, Pinocchio. Sorry, but regardless of what I said, you clearly stated that if his injuries were serious he MUST have been taken to an ER or taken away in an ambulance.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 12:50 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6s4ujFml7sU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73884 |
"Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message news:ruajbd$k58$5@dont-email.me... > On 2021-01-20 4:51 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >> news:ruainj$k58$2@dont-email.me... >>> On 2021-01-20 4:23 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>> news:ruah4m$e0o$2@dont-email.me... >>>>> On 2021-01-20 3:41 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Isn't it strange how we need to wait for the autopsy when >>>>>>>>>>> someone else declares a cause of death? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nope, nothing strange about that and we don’t need >>>>>>>>>> to wait for the autopsy with the one that got shot. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You declared it a stroke... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> More of your lies, and since lies is all you can manage, >>>>>>>> here goes the chain on your shit and lies. >>>>>> >>>>>>> You insisted that the fact he could get up and walk away was proof >>>>>>> that it couldn't have been the attack at the capitol that killed >>>>>>> him. >>>>>> >>>>>> More of your bare faced lies. >>>> >>>>> You get that I can produce the actual quote... >>>> >>>>> ...right? >>>> >>>> You actually present a very selective and flagrantly >>>> dishonest subset of what I actually said. >>> >>> Really? >>> >>> Let's look: >> >> Yeah, lets. >> >>> When I pointed out that a source YOU CHOSE said: >> >>> 'Capitol Police officer Brian D. Sicknick died from injuries sustained >>> in the riot.' >> >> You actually lied that he had his head bashed in. > > I used "hyperbole": You lied thru your teeth, as always. >>> You replied: >> >>> 'But says that he died in his office after leaving the capitol. >>> If he actually had had his head bashed in, he wouldn’t have >>> been able to return to his office, he would have been in an >>> ambulance or have been conveyed to an ER or would have >>> died on the floor in the capitol.' >> >>> So explain what part of the context is missing. >> >> Your stupid lie that he had his head bashed in, and where >> I said anything about proof of anything, Pinocchio. > > Sorry, but regardless of what I said, you clearly stated that if his > injuries were serious he MUST have been taken to an ER or taken away in an > ambulance. Never used the word MUST either, you silly little pathological liar, and I was talking about HAVING HIS HEAD BASHED IN. If he actually had had his head bashed in, he wouldn’t have been ALLOWED to return to his office, fuckwit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-20 18:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ruango$fbe$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73888 |
On 2021-01-20 5:50 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > > "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message > news:ruajbd$k58$5@dont-email.me... >> On 2021-01-20 4:51 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>> news:ruainj$k58$2@dont-email.me... >>>> On 2021-01-20 4:23 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>> news:ruah4m$e0o$2@dont-email.me... >>>>>> On 2021-01-20 3:41 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Isn't it strange how we need to wait for the autopsy when >>>>>>>>>>>> someone else declares a cause of death? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nope, nothing strange about that and we don’t need >>>>>>>>>>> to wait for the autopsy with the one that got shot. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You declared it a stroke... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> More of your lies, and since lies is all you can manage, >>>>>>>>> here goes the chain on your shit and lies. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You insisted that the fact he could get up and walk away was >>>>>>>> proof that it couldn't have been the attack at the capitol that >>>>>>>> killed him. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> More of your bare faced lies. >>>>> >>>>>> You get that I can produce the actual quote... >>>>> >>>>>> ...right? >>>>> >>>>> You actually present a very selective and flagrantly >>>>> dishonest subset of what I actually said. >>>> >>>> Really? >>>> >>>> Let's look: >>> >>> Yeah, lets. >>> >>>> When I pointed out that a source YOU CHOSE said: >>> >>>> 'Capitol Police officer Brian D. Sicknick died from injuries >>>> sustained in the riot.' >>> >>> You actually lied that he had his head bashed in. >> >> I used "hyperbole": > > You lied thru your teeth, as always. Nope. > >>>> You replied: >>> >>>> 'But says that he died in his office after leaving the capitol. >>>> If he actually had had his head bashed in, he wouldn’t have >>>> been able to return to his office, he would have been in an >>>> ambulance or have been conveyed to an ER or would have >>>> died on the floor in the capitol.' >>> >>>> So explain what part of the context is missing. >>> >>> Your stupid lie that he had his head bashed in, and where >>> I said anything about proof of anything, Pinocchio. >> >> Sorry, but regardless of what I said, you clearly stated that if his >> injuries were serious he MUST have been taken to an ER or taken away >> in an ambulance. > > Never used the word MUST either, you silly little pathological > liar, and I was talking about HAVING HIS HEAD BASHED IN. > If he actually had had his head bashed in, he wouldn’t have > been ALLOWED to return to his office, fuckwit. You still insisted that if he'd had a serious injury: 'he wouldn’t have been able to return to his office, he would have been in an ambulance or have been conveyed to an ER or would have died on the floor in the capitol.'
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 13:21 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6s6q6Fn07lU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73891 |
"Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message news:ruango$fbe$2@dont-email.me... > On 2021-01-20 5:50 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >> news:ruajbd$k58$5@dont-email.me... >>> On 2021-01-20 4:51 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>> news:ruainj$k58$2@dont-email.me... >>>>> On 2021-01-20 4:23 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>> news:ruah4m$e0o$2@dont-email.me... >>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 3:41 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Isn't it strange how we need to wait for the autopsy when >>>>>>>>>>>>> someone else declares a cause of death? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, nothing strange about that and we don’t need >>>>>>>>>>>> to wait for the autopsy with the one that got shot. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You declared it a stroke... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> More of your lies, and since lies is all you can manage, >>>>>>>>>> here goes the chain on your shit and lies. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You insisted that the fact he could get up and walk away was proof >>>>>>>>> that it couldn't have been the attack at the capitol that killed >>>>>>>>> him. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> More of your bare faced lies. >>>>>> >>>>>>> You get that I can produce the actual quote... >>>>>> >>>>>>> ...right? >>>>>> >>>>>> You actually present a very selective and flagrantly >>>>>> dishonest subset of what I actually said. >>>>> >>>>> Really? >>>>> >>>>> Let's look: >>>> >>>> Yeah, lets. >>>> >>>>> When I pointed out that a source YOU CHOSE said: >>>> >>>>> 'Capitol Police officer Brian D. Sicknick died from injuries sustained >>>>> in the riot.' >>>> >>>> You actually lied that he had his head bashed in. >>> >>> I used "hyperbole": >> >> You lied thru your teeth, as always. > > Nope. Yep. >>>>> You replied: >>>> >>>>> 'But says that he died in his office after leaving the capitol. >>>>> If he actually had had his head bashed in, he wouldn’t have >>>>> been able to return to his office, he would have been in an >>>>> ambulance or have been conveyed to an ER or would have >>>>> died on the floor in the capitol.' >>>> >>>>> So explain what part of the context is missing. >>>> >>>> Your stupid lie that he had his head bashed in, and where >>>> I said anything about proof of anything, Pinocchio. >>> >>> Sorry, but regardless of what I said, you clearly stated that if his >>> injuries were serious he MUST have been taken to an ER or taken away in >>> an ambulance. >> >> Never used the word MUST either, you silly little pathological >> liar, and I was talking about HAVING HIS HEAD BASHED IN. >> If he actually had had his head bashed in, he wouldn’t have >> been ALLOWED to return to his office, fuckwit. > > You still insisted that if he'd had a serious injury: More of your lies, I said that about having his HEAD BASHED IN. > 'he wouldn’t have been able to return to his office, he would have been in > an ambulance or have been conveyed to an ER or would have died on the > floor in the capitol.'
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-20 18:33 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ruap5p$oqv$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73894 |
On 2021-01-20 6:21 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > > "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message > news:ruango$fbe$2@dont-email.me... >> On 2021-01-20 5:50 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>> news:ruajbd$k58$5@dont-email.me... >>>> On 2021-01-20 4:51 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>> news:ruainj$k58$2@dont-email.me... >>>>>> On 2021-01-20 4:23 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:ruah4m$e0o$2@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 3:41 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Isn't it strange how we need to wait for the autopsy when >>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone else declares a cause of death? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, nothing strange about that and we don’t need >>>>>>>>>>>>> to wait for the autopsy with the one that got shot. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You declared it a stroke... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> More of your lies, and since lies is all you can manage, >>>>>>>>>>> here goes the chain on your shit and lies. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You insisted that the fact he could get up and walk away was >>>>>>>>>> proof that it couldn't have been the attack at the capitol >>>>>>>>>> that killed him. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> More of your bare faced lies. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You get that I can produce the actual quote... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ...right? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You actually present a very selective and flagrantly >>>>>>> dishonest subset of what I actually said. >>>>>> >>>>>> Really? >>>>>> >>>>>> Let's look: >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, lets. >>>>> >>>>>> When I pointed out that a source YOU CHOSE said: >>>>> >>>>>> 'Capitol Police officer Brian D. Sicknick died from injuries >>>>>> sustained in the riot.' >>>>> >>>>> You actually lied that he had his head bashed in. >>>> >>>> I used "hyperbole": >>> >>> You lied thru your teeth, as always. >> >> Nope. > > Yep. Nope. > >>>>>> You replied: >>>>> >>>>>> 'But says that he died in his office after leaving the capitol. >>>>>> If he actually had had his head bashed in, he wouldn’t have >>>>>> been able to return to his office, he would have been in an >>>>>> ambulance or have been conveyed to an ER or would have >>>>>> died on the floor in the capitol.' >>>>> >>>>>> So explain what part of the context is missing. >>>>> >>>>> Your stupid lie that he had his head bashed in, and where >>>>> I said anything about proof of anything, Pinocchio. >>>> >>>> Sorry, but regardless of what I said, you clearly stated that if his >>>> injuries were serious he MUST have been taken to an ER or taken away >>>> in an ambulance. >>> >>> Never used the word MUST either, you silly little pathological >>> liar, and I was talking about HAVING HIS HEAD BASHED IN. >>> If he actually had had his head bashed in, he wouldn’t have >>> been ALLOWED to return to his office, fuckwit. >> >> You still insisted that if he'd had a serious injury: > > More of your lies, I said that about having his HEAD BASHED IN. "Hyperbole", sunshine: look it up. > >> 'he wouldn’t have been able to return to his office, he would have >> been in an ambulance or have been conveyed to an ER or would have died >> on the floor in the capitol.' > So you agree that he could have sustained injuries during the attack at the capitol that didn't immediately manifest, right? That's "yes", or "no", sunshine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 13:49 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6s8d3Fn8nrU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73896 |
"Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message news:ruap5p$oqv$2@dont-email.me... > On 2021-01-20 6:21 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >> news:ruango$fbe$2@dont-email.me... >>> On 2021-01-20 5:50 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>> news:ruajbd$k58$5@dont-email.me... >>>>> On 2021-01-20 4:51 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>> news:ruainj$k58$2@dont-email.me... >>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 4:23 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:ruah4m$e0o$2@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 3:41 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Isn't it strange how we need to wait for the autopsy when >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone else declares a cause of death? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, nothing strange about that and we don’t need >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to wait for the autopsy with the one that got shot. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You declared it a stroke... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> More of your lies, and since lies is all you can manage, >>>>>>>>>>>> here goes the chain on your shit and lies. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You insisted that the fact he could get up and walk away was >>>>>>>>>>> proof that it couldn't have been the attack at the capitol that >>>>>>>>>>> killed him. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> More of your bare faced lies. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You get that I can produce the actual quote... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ...right? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You actually present a very selective and flagrantly >>>>>>>> dishonest subset of what I actually said. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Really? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Let's look: >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah, lets. >>>>>> >>>>>>> When I pointed out that a source YOU CHOSE said: >>>>>> >>>>>>> 'Capitol Police officer Brian D. Sicknick died from injuries >>>>>>> sustained in the riot.' >>>>>> >>>>>> You actually lied that he had his head bashed in. >>>>> >>>>> I used "hyperbole": >>>> >>>> You lied thru your teeth, as always. >>> >>> Nope. >> >> Yep. > > Nope. Yep. >>>>>>> You replied: >>>>>> >>>>>>> 'But says that he died in his office after leaving the capitol. >>>>>>> If he actually had had his head bashed in, he wouldn’t have >>>>>>> been able to return to his office, he would have been in an >>>>>>> ambulance or have been conveyed to an ER or would have >>>>>>> died on the floor in the capitol.' >>>>>> >>>>>>> So explain what part of the context is missing. >>>>>> >>>>>> Your stupid lie that he had his head bashed in, and where >>>>>> I said anything about proof of anything, Pinocchio. >>>>> >>>>> Sorry, but regardless of what I said, you clearly stated that if his >>>>> injuries were serious he MUST have been taken to an ER or taken away >>>>> in an ambulance. >>>> >>>> Never used the word MUST either, you silly little pathological >>>> liar, and I was talking about HAVING HIS HEAD BASHED IN. >>>> If he actually had had his head bashed in, he wouldn’t have >>>> been ALLOWED to return to his office, fuckwit. >>> >>> You still insisted that if he'd had a serious injury: >> >> More of your lies, I said that about having his HEAD BASHED IN. >> >>> 'he wouldn’t have been able to return to his office, he would have been >>> in an ambulance or have been conveyed to an ER or would have died on the >>> floor in the capitol.' > So you agree that he could have sustained injuries during the attack at > the capitol that didn't immediately manifest, right? Always have, and said so too. > That's "yes", or "no", sunshine. Wrong as always, shitshine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-20 18:51 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ruaq7t$u8l$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73899 |
On 2021-01-20 6:49 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > >>>>>>>> 'But says that he died in his office after leaving the capitol. >>>>>>>> If he actually had had his head bashed in, he wouldn’t have >>>>>>>> been able to return to his office, he would have been in an >>>>>>>> ambulance or have been conveyed to an ER or would have >>>>>>>> died on the floor in the capitol.' >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So explain what part of the context is missing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Your stupid lie that he had his head bashed in, and where >>>>>>> I said anything about proof of anything, Pinocchio. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry, but regardless of what I said, you clearly stated that if >>>>>> his injuries were serious he MUST have been taken to an ER or >>>>>> taken away in an ambulance. >>>>> >>>>> Never used the word MUST either, you silly little pathological >>>>> liar, and I was talking about HAVING HIS HEAD BASHED IN. >>>>> If he actually had had his head bashed in, he wouldn’t have >>>>> been ALLOWED to return to his office, fuckwit. >>>> >>>> You still insisted that if he'd had a serious injury: >>> >>> More of your lies, I said that about having his HEAD BASHED IN. >>> >>>> 'he wouldn’t have been able to return to his office, he would have >>>> been in an ambulance or have been conveyed to an ER or would have >>>> died on the floor in the capitol.' > >> So you agree that he could have sustained injuries during the attack >> at the capitol that didn't immediately manifest, right? > > Always have, and said so too. So provide the quote.... ...but we both know that can't happen... ...don't we? :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 14:13 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6s9qmFng4kU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73900 |
Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote > Rod Speed wrote >>>>>>>>> 'But says that he died in his office after leaving the capitol. >>>>>>>>> If he actually had had his head bashed in, he wouldn’t have >>>>>>>>> been able to return to his office, he would have been in an >>>>>>>>> ambulance or have been conveyed to an ER or would have >>>>>>>>> died on the floor in the capitol.' >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So explain what part of the context is missing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Your stupid lie that he had his head bashed in, and where >>>>>>>> I said anything about proof of anything, Pinocchio. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry, but regardless of what I said, you clearly stated that if his >>>>>>> injuries were serious he MUST have been taken to an ER or taken away >>>>>>> in an ambulance. >>>>>> >>>>>> Never used the word MUST either, you silly little pathological >>>>>> liar, and I was talking about HAVING HIS HEAD BASHED IN. >>>>>> If he actually had had his head bashed in, he wouldn’t have >>>>>> been ALLOWED to return to his office, fuckwit. >>>>> >>>>> You still insisted that if he'd had a serious injury: >>>> >>>> More of your lies, I said that about having his HEAD BASHED IN. >>>> >>>>> 'he wouldn’t have been able to return to his office, he would have >>>>> been in an ambulance or have been conveyed to an ER or would have died >>>>> on the floor in the capitol.' >> >>> So you agree that he could have sustained injuries during the attack at >>> the capitol that didn't immediately manifest, right? >> >> Always have, and said so too. > > So provide the quote.... Go and fuck yourself, again. > ...but we both know that can't happen... Wrong, as always. Not playing your stupid games.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-20 19:50 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ruatmt$ffs$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73903 |
On 2021-01-20 7:13 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote >> Rod Speed wrote > >>>>>>>>>> 'But says that he died in his office after leaving the capitol. >>>>>>>>>> If he actually had had his head bashed in, he wouldn’t have >>>>>>>>>> been able to return to his office, he would have been in an >>>>>>>>>> ambulance or have been conveyed to an ER or would have >>>>>>>>>> died on the floor in the capitol.' >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So explain what part of the context is missing. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Your stupid lie that he had his head bashed in, and where >>>>>>>>> I said anything about proof of anything, Pinocchio. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry, but regardless of what I said, you clearly stated that if >>>>>>>> his injuries were serious he MUST have been taken to an ER or >>>>>>>> taken away in an ambulance. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Never used the word MUST either, you silly little pathological >>>>>>> liar, and I was talking about HAVING HIS HEAD BASHED IN. >>>>>>> If he actually had had his head bashed in, he wouldn’t have >>>>>>> been ALLOWED to return to his office, fuckwit. >>>>>> >>>>>> You still insisted that if he'd had a serious injury: >>>>> >>>>> More of your lies, I said that about having his HEAD BASHED IN. >>>>> >>>>>> 'he wouldn’t have been able to return to his office, he would have >>>>>> been in an ambulance or have been conveyed to an ER or would have >>>>>> died on the floor in the capitol.' >>> >>>> So you agree that he could have sustained injuries during the attack >>>> at the capitol that didn't immediately manifest, right? >>> >>> Always have, and said so too. >> >> So provide the quote.... > > Go and fuck yourself, again. Right. That's what everyone who's got nothing has to say for themselves. > >> ...but we both know that can't happen... > > Wrong, as always. Not playing your stupid games. > Translation: You've got nothing, sunshine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-15 06:39 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <V9ydnZMN3bxpEZz9nZ2dnUU7-fnNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #73650 |
On Jan 14, 2021 at 11:02:25 PM PST, "The Real Bev" <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: > On 01/14/2021 05:36 PM, sms wrote: >> On 1/14/2021 12:02 AM, Bernd Froehlich wrote: >>> On 13. Jan 2021 at 21:17:00 CET, "Anonymous Reactionary" >>> <anonymous@internet.everywhere> wrote: >>> >>>> The Left is composed of homicidal terrorists >>>> and maniacs. >>> >>> Umm, just remind me: was it the left that stormed the capitol and got 6 >>> people killed? >> >> One of the rioters that was arrested just committed suicide. So 7 people >> dies as a result now. None of those people would likely be dead if not >> for the riots. > > They might have been in car accidents or contracted COVID-19 or been > shot by a jealous lover. Three people died of some sort of medical > thing (heart attack? stroke?) The woman with "some sort of medical thing" was crushed to death, and trampled by her fellow cult entranced rioters. Her death was initially labelled a medical emergency because an ambulance and EMTs were summoned when she ws found on the floor of the rotunda where she had no business being. > One cop was apparently bashed to death with a fire extinguisher and one > rioter was apparently shot by a cop. More than apparently shot, the bullet wound in her neck seemed to remove all doubt. > > The suicide was individual choice. However, without the provocation of the riot, and whatever his involvement might have been, that Capitol Police officer might not have needed to make that individual choice. > > > If this is what insurrection has become we're truly in deep shit. And > speaking of shit, wasn't somebody going to take a dump in Pelosi's chair? Ultimately none of this should have happened, and it can all be traced back to Trump, and his preemptive claim of election fraud which never existed, along with his fueling the flames of his white supremacist, racist, fascist cult of personality. -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-15 18:38 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rttjjn$jit$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73657 |
On 01/15/2021 04:39 AM, Savageduck wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2021 at 11:02:25 PM PST, "The Real Bev" <bashley101@gmail.com>
>> If this is what insurrection has become we're truly in deep shit. And
>> speaking of shit, wasn't somebody going to take a dump in Pelosi's chair?
>
> Ultimately none of this should have happened, and it can all be traced back to
> Trump, and his preemptive claim of election fraud which never existed, along
> with his fueling the flames of his white supremacist, racist, fascist cult of
> personality.
I don't accept that. I am none of those things, but I voted for him
because I disagree with the Democrats' agenda and he was the only other
choice. I hoped for more than I got.
If there's nothing to prevent fraud there's no way to determine if it
happens. Imagine a big basket full of ballots with a sign saying
ELIGIBLE VOTERS PLEASE TAKE ONE...
--
Cheers, Bev
"You should be glad that bridge fell down -- I was planning
to build thirteen more to the same design."
-- Attributed to I.K. Brunel, addressing the
Directors of the Great Western Railway
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-15 22:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <150120212229428585%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #73671 |
In article <rttjjn$jit$1@dont-email.me>, The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: > If there's nothing to prevent fraud there's no way to determine if it > happens. there's plenty to prevent and detect voter fraud, which is why there wasn't any. nothing is perfect, and out of ~160 million votes, there will always be minor problems, but nothing to come anywhere close to changing the results. three people in pennsylvania were caught illegally voting for trump. one person in florida also registered in georgia, voting for trump both times. > Imagine a big basket full of ballots with a sign saying > ELIGIBLE VOTERS PLEASE TAKE ONE... that did not happen, but even if it did, only one ballot per registered voter would be valid. any additional ballots from the same voter would be rejected as would ballots from non-registered voters, with the person criminally charged for voter fraud.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-16 16:11 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6fasgF79p2U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73671 |
"The Real Bev" <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote in message news:rttjjn$jit$1@dont-email.me... > On 01/15/2021 04:39 AM, Savageduck wrote: >> On Jan 14, 2021 at 11:02:25 PM PST, "The Real Bev" <bashley101@gmail.com> > >>> If this is what insurrection has become we're truly in deep shit. And >>> speaking of shit, wasn't somebody going to take a dump in Pelosi's >>> chair? >> >> Ultimately none of this should have happened, and it can all be traced >> back to >> Trump, and his preemptive claim of election fraud which never existed, >> along >> with his fueling the flames of his white supremacist, racist, fascist >> cult of >> personality. > > I don't accept that. I am none of those things, but I voted for him > because I disagree with the Democrats' agenda and he was the only other > choice. I hoped for more than I got. > If there's nothing to prevent fraud There is plenty to prevent voting fraud. > there's no way to determine if it happens. But when there is plenty to prevent voting fraud, there is. > Imagine a big basket full of ballots with a sign saying ELIGIBLE VOTERS > PLEASE TAKE ONE... There isnt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-15 08:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <rts5al$iga$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73650 |
"The Real Bev" <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote | They might have been in car accidents or contracted COVID-19 or been | shot by a jealous lover. Three people died of some sort of medical | thing (heart attack? stroke?) One cop was apparently bashed to death | with a fire extinguisher and one rioter was apparently shot by a cop. | The suicide was individual choice. | | If this is what insurrection has become we're truly in deep shit. I don't understand this attitude, even though I know it's become common. It's like teenagers who burn down their school because they think it's "cool", not realizing their own parents will have to pay to rebuild and that they're causing a lot of suffering for a lot of people, including themselves. Do you think it's OK because you believe Trump is cool and his amorality is a kind of morality? Teenagers are notoriously bad at reasoning and they've never had to earn their own living. But what about you? Have you never had to work for a living? Do you have so little regard for what the founders achieved that you treat it all with such flippancy? Where's your personal dignity? If you've lost it you can't blame Democrats or minorities or teachers unions. Your dignity is your own responsibility.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-15 18:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rttjrf$klr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73659 |
On 01/15/2021 05:28 AM, Mayayana wrote:
> "The Real Bev" <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote
>
> | They might have been in car accidents or contracted COVID-19 or been
> | shot by a jealous lover. Three people died of some sort of medical
> | thing (heart attack? stroke?) One cop was apparently bashed to death
> | with a fire extinguisher and one rioter was apparently shot by a cop.
> | The suicide was individual choice.
> |
> | If this is what insurrection has become we're truly in deep shit.
>
> I don't understand this attitude, even though I know
> it's become common. It's like teenagers who burn down their
> school because they think it's "cool", not realizing their own
> parents will have to pay to rebuild and that they're causing
> a lot of suffering for a lot of people, including themselves.
> Do you think it's OK because you believe Trump is cool and
> his amorality is a kind of morality?
What gives you the idea that I approve? I disapprove strongly. I
disapprove of any destruction for its own sake. The cause is
irrelevant. I think it's much worse to loot and burn the businesses of
ordinary citizens, but that's not the same as saying that it's OK for a
lot of stupid people to invade the Capitol.
> Teenagers are notoriously bad at reasoning and they've
> never had to earn their own living. But what about you?
> Have you never had to work for a living? Do you have so
> little regard for what the founders achieved that you treat
> it all with such flippancy? Where's your personal dignity?
> If you've lost it you can't blame Democrats or minorities
> or teachers unions. Your dignity is your own responsibility.
I thought you were more perceptive...
I can be flippant because that's the way I've been all my life and I'm
not about to change. That says nothing about what I approve or
disapprove of.
--
Cheers, Bev
"You should be glad that bridge fell down -- I was planning
to build thirteen more to the same design."
-- Attributed to I.K. Brunel, addressing the
Directors of the Great Western Railway
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-15 22:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <150120212229448668%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #73672 |
In article <rttjrf$klr$1@dont-email.me>, The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: > > | They might have been in car accidents or contracted COVID-19 or been > > | shot by a jealous lover. Three people died of some sort of medical > > | thing (heart attack? stroke?) One cop was apparently bashed to death > > | with a fire extinguisher and one rioter was apparently shot by a cop. > > | The suicide was individual choice. > > | > > | If this is what insurrection has become we're truly in deep shit. > > > > I don't understand this attitude, even though I know > > it's become common. It's like teenagers who burn down their > > school because they think it's "cool", not realizing their own > > parents will have to pay to rebuild and that they're causing > > a lot of suffering for a lot of people, including themselves. > > Do you think it's OK because you believe Trump is cool and > > his amorality is a kind of morality? > > What gives you the idea that I approve? I disapprove strongly. I > disapprove of any destruction for its own sake. The cause is > irrelevant. I think it's much worse to loot and burn the businesses of > ordinary citizens, but that's not the same as saying that it's OK for a > lot of stupid people to invade the Capitol. they did a lot more than 'invade the capitol'. insurrectionists violently broke into the capitol with the intent to assassinate the vice president as well as most, if not all of congress, in an attempt to overthrow the government. they also caused significant amount of damage and so far, directly or indirectly killed six people and injured many more. they took down american flags and replaced them with confederate flags and trump flags. if you think that looting a business is somehow worse, then your brain is wired wrong.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 17 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web