Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #73228 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-01-09 10:11 +0000 |
| Last post | 2021-01-10 10:58 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 391 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 10:11 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Dieter Britz <dieterhansbritz@gmail.com> - 2021-01-09 13:01 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-09 08:16 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 09:34 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-09 12:35 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 11:09 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:49 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:34 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-09 12:41 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 17:47 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-09 14:29 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-09 12:56 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-09 21:29 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 21:03 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:24 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2021-01-09 08:58 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:27 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-09 12:38 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 09:12 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2021-01-09 18:03 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 12:16 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:53 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-10 11:45 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 14:03 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 09:54 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 17:02 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 12:26 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 12:20 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 15:20 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 23:29 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 10:38 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 17:40 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 12:52 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 20:08 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 14:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 13:51 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 05:45 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 09:38 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 03:26 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 19:56 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 07:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-14 10:15 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-14 18:42 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 16:39 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2021-01-11 09:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-11 10:27 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 22:44 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 19:00 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-11 10:27 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-11 17:51 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 13:33 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 08:40 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 20:22 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 10:53 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 18:01 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 12:59 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 20:08 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 14:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 20:19 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 15:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-12 22:51 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-13 02:36 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-13 16:19 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 10:56 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-11 16:34 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-11 10:35 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-11 19:24 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 04:39 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:39 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:29 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Dieter Britz <dieterhansbritz@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:38 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-10 08:55 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 15:41 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 21:48 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-10 19:47 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-11 15:22 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 13:35 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 10:05 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-11 16:20 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-11 13:05 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-11 18:15 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 21:48 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 10:13 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 15:23 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 15:47 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-12 13:11 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-12 15:02 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-12 15:17 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 10:19 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-12 08:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-12 13:41 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 05:51 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people KenW <ken1943@invalid.net> - 2021-01-12 15:58 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-12 18:15 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 07:46 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 21:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-13 02:36 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 14:31 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-12 14:47 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 15:26 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 19:46 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-01-13 08:07 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 08:37 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-13 12:31 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:49 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 11:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-13 16:07 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 18:57 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 21:39 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 22:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 06:02 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 21:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-18 09:10 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 08:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:06 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 12:51 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 09:58 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-18 18:24 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-20 00:18 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-18 18:23 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 14:14 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 13:21 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:42 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 16:16 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 09:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 14:23 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 14:21 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 10:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 15:27 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:13 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:27 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 13:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 15:46 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 09:19 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 13:03 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:25 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 13:38 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-20 21:44 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:44 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-21 19:19 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 11:39 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:52 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:55 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:48 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 22:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:50 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 15:30 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-20 21:46 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:48 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-21 19:20 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 08:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:59 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 15:19 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 16:35 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:40 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 14:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 16:17 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 14:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 17:46 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 10:23 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:42 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 14:20 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 17:46 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 10:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 15:28 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:28 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:47 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Leo <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2021-01-18 20:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 20:42 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 17:45 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:18 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-20 00:28 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 23:42 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 17:43 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-19 11:24 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 05:39 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 08:07 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 19:33 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 11:35 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 15:37 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 14:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 14:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 19:54 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 20:00 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:33 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-21 05:46 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 03:05 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 10:29 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:44 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:00 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:20 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:35 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 10:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:13 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-21 17:27 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:48 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 15:04 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 10:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 19:25 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 14:33 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 11:57 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:20 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 19:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 19:28 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 20:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 22:09 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 12:01 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:25 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 14:29 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 19:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 15:02 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 11:50 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 12:01 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:31 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:47 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-22 10:06 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 09:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 10:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:36 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 13:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:08 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:35 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 11:43 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:46 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 03:02 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:23 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-21 06:06 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:42 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:15 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:47 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 12:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:04 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:20 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:53 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:19 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 19:59 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 15:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 10:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:33 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 07:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 10:33 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 09:27 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 21:20 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 15:46 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 14:12 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:52 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:24 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:44 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:55 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 17:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 12:54 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:07 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:41 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 19:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:32 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 13:09 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 12:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 15:19 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 14:46 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-13 16:14 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:53 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 16:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 22:19 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 14:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-13 13:49 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 13:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:40 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 08:15 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Hergen Lehmann <hlehmann.expires.5-11@snafu.de> - 2021-01-13 22:09 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-13 20:17 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bernd Froehlich <befr@eaglesoft.de> - 2021-01-14 08:02 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 09:43 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-14 07:49 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-14 14:43 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-14 23:53 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 12:15 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 14:34 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 21:28 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-14 17:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 23:02 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 19:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 12:17 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:50 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 13:17 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:34 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:10 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:21 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 13:37 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:41 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:23 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:43 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:51 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:54 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 12:50 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:21 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:13 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 19:50 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-15 06:39 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 18:38 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-15 22:29 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 16:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-15 08:28 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 18:42 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-15 22:29 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 16:16 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-15 21:37 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 17:24 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-15 23:00 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 19:29 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 01:04 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 20:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 11:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 08:48 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 14:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 10:24 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 15:43 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 13:25 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 19:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 16:31 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 23:57 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 19:21 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-17 13:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-17 16:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 11:54 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 13:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:44 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2021-01-16 09:59 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 21:08 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 09:08 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2021-01-16 02:49 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 04:51 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 12:07 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 08:37 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 14:01 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:59 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 13:07 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-18 12:24 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:43 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-16 16:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-15 07:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 03:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-15 11:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 08:07 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 13:06 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 04:16 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-12 22:27 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 11:16 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-13 02:36 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:13 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 15:19 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 07:53 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 13:35 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:58 +0000
Page 14 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 … 20 Next page →
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 10:32 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ruchc7$5v6$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73912 |
On 2021-01-20 8:11 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > > "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message > news:ruau71$hlh$1@dont-email.me... >> On 2021-01-20 7:19 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>> news:ruaqbf$u8l$3@dont-email.me... >>>> On 2021-01-20 6:46 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>> news:ruap31$oqv$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>> On 2021-01-20 6:20 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:ruanet$fbe$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 5:46 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:ruaj8u$k58$4@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 4:47 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:ruaiaj$k58$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 4:22 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ruah25$e0o$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 3:42 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Savageduck" <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:xvSdnZ7jpOwsP5X9nZ2dnUU7-bHNnZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 2021 at 11:35:18 AM PST, "Alan Baker" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 12:33 a.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Chris" <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ru8ocd$1bk$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 01/18/2021 06:10 AM, Mayayana wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trump[ into the white >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without any doubt, that he was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> truth is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just another dirty lie. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him. I voted for him >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because he wasn't a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democrat. I expected lower taxes, a stronger >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> border, a stronger >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> military, a pathway to legality for the foreigners >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who were already >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here, and the elimination of a lot of stupid shit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Obama introduced. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instead I got inane tweets. Still, he's not Hillary. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump is a brand. He sold the brand to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his voters and all they got were slogans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They got rather more than that in some areas like Syria. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> His whole presidency was a grift to fill his pockets >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In fact he donated his presidential salary. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that salary is the only way he could get money from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the job, is it? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What he charged the Secret Service for accommodation, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and golf cart rental at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mar-a-Largo, West Palm Beach, Doral, Bedminster, & Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> National, D.C. more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than made up for any "sacrifice" of Presidential salary. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BULLSHIT. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, well-documented fact: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/secret-service-has-paid-rates-as-high-as-650-a-night-for-rooms-at-trumps-properties/2020/02/06/7f27a7c6-3ec5-11ea-8872-5df698785a4e_story.html> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Not that it amounted to more than his presidential salary >>>>>>>>>>>>> it isnt. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Really? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And you know that... ...how? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Don’t need to when rubbing your stupid nose >>>>>>>>>>> in the fact that it isnt well documented that it >>>>>>>>>>> exceeded his presidential salary, fuckwit >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've provided something... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nope, I knew that story long ago. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And you've still provided... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> NOTHING. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You only provide shit and lies. >>>>> >>>>>> It's a lie that the US government has paid a lot of money to >>>>>> Trump's businesses? >>>>> >>>>> The claim that he got more from the govt for >>>>> the secret service goons accommodation and golf >>>>> cart rental than his presidential salary is straight >>>>> from your arse, we can tell from the smell. >>>> >>>> That implies you know the figures... >>> >>> Wrong, as always. >>> >>> And YOU made the original claim. >> >> I made the original claim that the US government paid a lot of money >> to Trump's businesses, and you accepted that claim. > > Nope, just that they paid SOME money to > trump businesses, a different matter entirely. So... ...what: $20... ...$50? > >>> So YOU to substantiate that claim. >>> >>> THAT’S how it works, shitshine. >>> >>>> ...so let's see them... >>> >>> Lets see yours. >>> >>>> ...and your source. >>> >>> Ditto. >> >> Sorry. > > Liar. > >> But I provided a link > > Which doesn’t even claim that the amount paid at > Mar-a-Lago exceeded his presidential salary, liar. > >> and you accepted the basic premise, > > Nope, it was no news to me, I had heard it before. Which MEANS you accept the basic premise. > >> then countered that it wasn't as much as Trump's salary. > > I didn’t say that either, you silly little pathological liar. You said PRECISELY that. It is still quoted above: 'Not that it amounted to more than his presidential salary it isnt.' So you're now going to insist that because you said "not...more" that you're argument is that Trump's businesses were paid precisely the amount of his salary? > >> So it is YOUR claim that hasn't got any support. > > Wrong, as always. And yet your support has never been presented. Nothing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-22 07:49 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6u7mbF4q71U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73944 |
"Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message news:ruchc7$5v6$2@dont-email.me... > On 2021-01-20 8:11 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >> news:ruau71$hlh$1@dont-email.me... >>> On 2021-01-20 7:19 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>> news:ruaqbf$u8l$3@dont-email.me... >>>>> On 2021-01-20 6:46 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>> news:ruap31$oqv$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 6:20 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:ruanet$fbe$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 5:46 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:ruaj8u$k58$4@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 4:47 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:ruaiaj$k58$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 4:22 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ruah25$e0o$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 3:42 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Savageduck" <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:xvSdnZ7jpOwsP5X9nZ2dnUU7-bHNnZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 2021 at 11:35:18 AM PST, "Alan Baker" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 12:33 a.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Chris" <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ru8ocd$1bk$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 01/18/2021 06:10 AM, Mayayana wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trump[ into the white >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any doubt, that he was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just another dirty lie. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him. I voted for him >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because he wasn't a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democrat. I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a stronger >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> military, a pathway to legality for the foreigners >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who were already >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here, and the elimination of a lot of stupid shit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Obama introduced. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instead I got inane tweets. Still, he's not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump is a brand. He sold the brand to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his voters and all they got were slogans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They got rather more than that in some areas like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Syria. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> His whole presidency was a grift to fill his pockets >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In fact he donated his presidential salary. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that salary is the only way he could get money from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the job, is it? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What he charged the Secret Service for accommodation, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> golf cart rental at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mar-a-Largo, West Palm Beach, Doral, Bedminster, & Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> National, D.C. more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than made up for any "sacrifice" of Presidential salary. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BULLSHIT. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, well-documented fact: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/secret-service-has-paid-rates-as-high-as-650-a-night-for-rooms-at-trumps-properties/2020/02/06/7f27a7c6-3ec5-11ea-8872-5df698785a4e_story.html> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not that it amounted to more than his presidential salary it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> isnt. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Really? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And you know that... ...how? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Don’t need to when rubbing your stupid nose >>>>>>>>>>>> in the fact that it isnt well documented that it >>>>>>>>>>>> exceeded his presidential salary, fuckwit >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I've provided something... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nope, I knew that story long ago. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And you've still provided... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> NOTHING. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You only provide shit and lies. >>>>>> >>>>>>> It's a lie that the US government has paid a lot of money to Trump's >>>>>>> businesses? >>>>>> >>>>>> The claim that he got more from the govt for >>>>>> the secret service goons accommodation and golf >>>>>> cart rental than his presidential salary is straight >>>>>> from your arse, we can tell from the smell. >>>>> >>>>> That implies you know the figures... >>>> >>>> Wrong, as always. >>>> >>>> And YOU made the original claim. >>> >>> I made the original claim that the US government paid a lot of money to >>> Trump's businesses, and you accepted that claim. >> >> Nope, just that they paid SOME money to >> trump businesses, a different matter entirely. > > So... ...what: $20... ...$50? > >> >>>> So YOU to substantiate that claim. >>>> >>>> THAT’S how it works, shitshine. >>>> >>>>> ...so let's see them... >>>> >>>> Lets see yours. >>>> >>>>> ...and your source. >>>> >>>> Ditto. >>> >>> Sorry. >> >> Liar. >> >>> But I provided a link >> >> Which doesn’t even claim that the amount paid at >> Mar-a-Lago exceeded his presidential salary, liar. >> >>> and you accepted the basic premise, >> >> Nope, it was no news to me, I had heard it before. > > Which MEANS you accept the basic premise. Nope. >>> then countered that it wasn't as much as Trump's salary. >> >> I didn’t say that either, you silly little pathological liar. > > You said PRECISELY that. Nope. > It is still quoted above: Nope. > 'Not that it amounted to more than his presidential salary it isnt.' I said that about what your cite didn’t say, fuckwit. > So you're now going to insist that because you said "not...more" that > you're argument is that Trump's businesses were paid precisely the amount > of his salary? Nope. >>> So it is YOUR claim that hasn't got any support. >> Wrong, as always. > And yet your support has never been presented. > Nothing. Sane with your original stupid claim.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 14:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rucu60$3p9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73951 |
On 2021-01-21 12:49 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > > "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message > news:ruchc7$5v6$2@dont-email.me... >> On 2021-01-20 8:11 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>> news:ruau71$hlh$1@dont-email.me... >>>> On 2021-01-20 7:19 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>> news:ruaqbf$u8l$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>> On 2021-01-20 6:46 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:ruap31$oqv$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 6:20 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:ruanet$fbe$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 5:46 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:ruaj8u$k58$4@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 4:47 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ruaiaj$k58$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 4:22 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ruah25$e0o$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 3:42 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Savageduck" <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:xvSdnZ7jpOwsP5X9nZ2dnUU7-bHNnZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 2021 at 11:35:18 AM PST, "Alan Baker" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 12:33 a.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Chris" <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ru8ocd$1bk$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 01/18/2021 06:10 AM, Mayayana wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> got trump[ into the white >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without any doubt, that he was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> truth is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just another dirty lie. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in him. I voted for him >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because he wasn't a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democrat. I expected lower taxes, a stronger >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> border, a stronger >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> military, a pathway to legality for the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> foreigners who were already >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here, and the elimination of a lot of stupid shit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Obama introduced. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instead I got inane tweets. Still, he's not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump is a brand. He sold the brand to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his voters and all they got were slogans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They got rather more than that in some areas like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Syria. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> His whole presidency was a grift to fill his pockets >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In fact he donated his presidential salary. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that salary is the only way he could get money >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the job, is it? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What he charged the Secret Service for accommodation, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and golf cart rental at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mar-a-Largo, West Palm Beach, Doral, Bedminster, & >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump National, D.C. more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than made up for any "sacrifice" of Presidential salary. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BULLSHIT. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, well-documented fact: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/secret-service-has-paid-rates-as-high-as-650-a-night-for-rooms-at-trumps-properties/2020/02/06/7f27a7c6-3ec5-11ea-8872-5df698785a4e_story.html> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not that it amounted to more than his presidential salary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it isnt. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you know that... ...how? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don’t need to when rubbing your stupid nose >>>>>>>>>>>>> in the fact that it isnt well documented that it >>>>>>>>>>>>> exceeded his presidential salary, fuckwit >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I've provided something... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nope, I knew that story long ago. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And you've still provided... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> NOTHING. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You only provide shit and lies. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's a lie that the US government has paid a lot of money to >>>>>>>> Trump's businesses? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The claim that he got more from the govt for >>>>>>> the secret service goons accommodation and golf >>>>>>> cart rental than his presidential salary is straight >>>>>>> from your arse, we can tell from the smell. >>>>>> >>>>>> That implies you know the figures... >>>>> >>>>> Wrong, as always. >>>>> >>>>> And YOU made the original claim. >>>> >>>> I made the original claim that the US government paid a lot of money >>>> to Trump's businesses, and you accepted that claim. >>> >>> Nope, just that they paid SOME money to >>> trump businesses, a different matter entirely. >> >> So... ...what: $20... ...$50? >> >>> >>>>> So YOU to substantiate that claim. >>>>> >>>>> THAT’S how it works, shitshine. >>>>> >>>>>> ...so let's see them... >>>>> >>>>> Lets see yours. >>>>> >>>>>> ...and your source. >>>>> >>>>> Ditto. >>>> >>>> Sorry. >>> >>> Liar. >>> >>>> But I provided a link >>> >>> Which doesn’t even claim that the amount paid at >>> Mar-a-Lago exceeded his presidential salary, liar. >>> >>>> and you accepted the basic premise, >>> >>> Nope, it was no news to me, I had heard it before. >> >> Which MEANS you accept the basic premise. > > Nope. Yup. If some says "X happened" and you say "That's no news to me, I've heard it before", no one understands that to mean anything other than you agree that it happened. > >>>> then countered that it wasn't as much as Trump's salary. >>> >>> I didn’t say that either, you silly little pathological liar. >> >> You said PRECISELY that. > > Nope. > >> It is still quoted above: > > Nope. > >> 'Not that it amounted to more than his presidential salary it isnt.' > > I said that about what your cite didn’t say, fuckwit. It is still and absolute statement about the relationship between the two quantities. > >> So you're now going to insist that because you said "not...more" that >> you're argument is that Trump's businesses were paid precisely the >> amount of his salary? > > Nope. > >>>> So it is YOUR claim that hasn't got any support. > >>> Wrong, as always. > >> And yet your support has never been presented. > >> Nothing. > > Sane with your original stupid claim. Nope. I provided a source. It's still quoted above, too. And it also says this: 'The records show more than $471,000 in payments from taxpayers to Trump’s companies. But — because these records cover only a fraction of Trump’s travel during a fraction of his term — the actual total is likely to be higher.' And before you say that's just what "some journo" says: "A recent report from the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) raised similar concerns. G GAO found that federal agencies spent at least $13.6 million for just four trips to Mar-a-Lago in early 2017. Of those expenses, the Secret Service incurred about $1.6 million to provide support. JO also found that the Secret Service did not consistently report its cost as required by the Presidential Protection Assistance Act of 1976. These troubling reports come amid the Committee's own investigation of taxpayer spending at the President's businesses, including the Department of Defense's expenditure of nearly $200,000 at President trumps Turnbo resort in Scotland between August 2017 and July 2019.' <https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/2020-02-12.CBM%20Speier%20to%20Murray-USSS%20re%20Exorbitant%20Charges.pdf> You see, sunshine, unlike you, I can back up what I say.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-22 09:33 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6udqdF5v3gU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73964 |
"Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message news:rucu60$3p9$1@dont-email.me... > On 2021-01-21 12:49 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >> news:ruchc7$5v6$2@dont-email.me... >>> On 2021-01-20 8:11 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>> news:ruau71$hlh$1@dont-email.me... >>>>> On 2021-01-20 7:19 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>> news:ruaqbf$u8l$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 6:46 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:ruap31$oqv$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 6:20 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:ruanet$fbe$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 5:46 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:ruaj8u$k58$4@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 4:47 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ruaiaj$k58$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 4:22 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ruah25$e0o$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 3:42 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Savageduck" <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:xvSdnZ7jpOwsP5X9nZ2dnUU7-bHNnZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 2021 at 11:35:18 AM PST, "Alan Baker" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021-01-20 12:33 a.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Chris" <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ru8ocd$1bk$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 01/18/2021 06:10 AM, Mayayana wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trump[ into the white >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without any doubt, that he was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> truth is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just another dirty lie. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him. I voted for him >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because he wasn't a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democrat. I expected lower taxes, a stronger >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> border, a stronger >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> military, a pathway to legality for the foreigners >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who were already >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here, and the elimination of a lot of stupid shit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Obama introduced. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instead I got inane tweets. Still, he's not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump is a brand. He sold the brand to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his voters and all they got were slogans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They got rather more than that in some areas like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Syria. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> His whole presidency was a grift to fill his pockets >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In fact he donated his presidential salary. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that salary is the only way he could get money from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the job, is it? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What he charged the Secret Service for accommodation, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and golf cart rental at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mar-a-Largo, West Palm Beach, Doral, Bedminster, & Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> National, D.C. more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than made up for any "sacrifice" of Presidential salary. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BULLSHIT. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, well-documented fact: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/secret-service-has-paid-rates-as-high-as-650-a-night-for-rooms-at-trumps-properties/2020/02/06/7f27a7c6-3ec5-11ea-8872-5df698785a4e_story.html> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not that it amounted to more than his presidential salary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it isnt. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you know that... ...how? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don’t need to when rubbing your stupid nose >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the fact that it isnt well documented that it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> exceeded his presidential salary, fuckwit >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've provided something... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, I knew that story long ago. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And you've still provided... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> NOTHING. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You only provide shit and lies. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's a lie that the US government has paid a lot of money to >>>>>>>>> Trump's businesses? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The claim that he got more from the govt for >>>>>>>> the secret service goons accommodation and golf >>>>>>>> cart rental than his presidential salary is straight >>>>>>>> from your arse, we can tell from the smell. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That implies you know the figures... >>>>>> >>>>>> Wrong, as always. >>>>>> >>>>>> And YOU made the original claim. >>>>> >>>>> I made the original claim that the US government paid a lot of money >>>>> to Trump's businesses, and you accepted that claim. >>>> >>>> Nope, just that they paid SOME money to >>>> trump businesses, a different matter entirely. >>> >>> So... ...what: $20... ...$50? >>> >>>> >>>>>> So YOU to substantiate that claim. >>>>>> >>>>>> THAT’S how it works, shitshine. >>>>>> >>>>>>> ...so let's see them... >>>>>> >>>>>> Lets see yours. >>>>>> >>>>>>> ...and your source. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ditto. >>>>> >>>>> Sorry. >>>> >>>> Liar. >>>> >>>>> But I provided a link >>>> >>>> Which doesn’t even claim that the amount paid at >>>> Mar-a-Lago exceeded his presidential salary, liar. >>>> >>>>> and you accepted the basic premise, >>>> >>>> Nope, it was no news to me, I had heard it before. >>> >>> Which MEANS you accept the basic premise. >> >> Nope. > > Yup. Nope. dope. > If some says "X happened" and you say "That's no news to me, I've heard it > before", no one understands that to mean anything other than you agree > that it happened. I never said it didn’t happen, I JUST said that you have no evidence to support your claim that what he got that way was more than his presidential salary. >>>>> then countered that it wasn't as much as Trump's salary. >>>> >>>> I didn’t say that either, you silly little pathological liar. >>> >>> You said PRECISELY that. >> >> Nope. >> >>> It is still quoted above: >> >> Nope. >> >>> 'Not that it amounted to more than his presidential salary it isnt.' >> >> I said that about what your cite didn’t say, fuckwit. > It is still and absolute statement about the relationship between the two > quantities. Wrong, as always. >>> So you're now going to insist that because you said "not...more" that >>> you're argument is that Trump's businesses were paid precisely the >>> amount of his salary? >> >> Nope. >> >>>>> So it is YOUR claim that hasn't got any support. >> >>>> Wrong, as always. >> >>> And yet your support has never been presented. >> >>> Nothing. >> >> Sane with your original stupid claim. > > Nope. > > I provided a source. Which doesn’t support your claim that he got more money that way than his presidential salary. > It's still quoted above, too. Pity it doesn’t support your claim that he got more money that way than his presidential salary. > And it also says this: > 'The records show more than $471,000 in payments from taxpayers to Trump’s > companies. But — because these records cover only a fraction of Trump’s > travel during a fraction of his term — the actual total is likely to be > higher.' And the total presidential salary over 4 years is much higher again. Three times more in fact. > And before you say that's just what "some journo" says: > "A recent report from the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office > (GAO) raised similar concerns. G GAO found that federal agencies spent at > least $13.6 million for just four trips to Mar-a-Lago in early 2017. That’s not what Trump charged them. > Of those expenses, the Secret Service incurred about $1.6 million to > provide support. That’s not what Trump charged them. > JO also found that the Secret Service did not consistently report its cost > as required by the Presidential Protection Assistance Act of 1976. > These troubling reports come amid the Committee's own investigation of > taxpayer spending at the President's businesses, including the Department > of Defense's expenditure of nearly $200,000 at President trumps Turnbo > resort in Scotland between August 2017 and July 2019.' Still nothing like his total presidential salary over 4 years. > <https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/2020-02-12.CBM%20Speier%20to%20Murray-USSS%20re%20Exorbitant%20Charges.pdf> > You see, sunshine, unlike you, I can back up what I say. Pity you did, shitshine,
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-20 07:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ru9ims$n1o$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73820 |
On 1/20/2021 12:07 AM, Chris wrote: > The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 01/18/2021 06:10 AM, Mayayana wrote: >>> "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >>> >>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into the white >>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, that he was >>> | not capable of handling the job. >>> | >>> >>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >>> just another dirty lie. >> >> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted for him >> because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he wasn't a >> Democrat. I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger >> military, a pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already >> here, and the elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama introduced. >> Instead I got inane tweets. Still, he's not Hillary. > > Trump is a brand. He sold the brand to his voters and all they got were > slogans. His whole presidency was a grift to fill his pockets and improve > his brand. Unfortunately for him, he didn't realise that it came with > responsibility and consequences. He's now seriously damaged (hopefully > fatally) his brand. No-one wants anything to do with him. He's also too > afraid to go back to NY and is going to hide in Florida. Although, who > knows how long for as his neighbours have already made it clear he's not > allowed to reside at Mar-a-lago. Amusingly, his efforts to sell his hotel in D.C. have been unsuccessful, not just because of the unrealistic price he's demanding, but also because a condition of the sale is to retain the Trump name on the property. Eventually he'll have to sell it at a much lower price than he's asking, and remove the condition that the buyer retain the Trump name, or the bank will foreclose. Or perhaps Sheldon Adelson will step in and bail him out and buy the property and keep the Trump name on the hotel, though that will negatively affect bookings.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-20 10:33 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <dcWdnZDb4bbwxpX9nZ2dnUU7-VGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #73829 |
On Jan 20, 2021 at 7:36:59 AM PST, "sms" <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote: > On 1/20/2021 12:07 AM, Chris wrote: >> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 01/18/2021 06:10 AM, Mayayana wrote: >>>> "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >>>> >>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into the white >>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, that he was >>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>> | >>>> >>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >>>> just another dirty lie. >>> >>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted for him >>> because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he wasn't a >>> Democrat. I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger >>> military, a pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already >>> here, and the elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama introduced. >>> Instead I got inane tweets. Still, he's not Hillary. >> >> Trump is a brand. He sold the brand to his voters and all they got were >> slogans. His whole presidency was a grift to fill his pockets and improve >> his brand. Unfortunately for him, he didn't realise that it came with >> responsibility and consequences. He's now seriously damaged (hopefully >> fatally) his brand. No-one wants anything to do with him. He's also too >> afraid to go back to NY and is going to hide in Florida. Although, who >> knows how long for as his neighbours have already made it clear he's not >> allowed to reside at Mar-a-lago. > > Amusingly, his efforts to sell his hotel in D.C. have been unsuccessful, > not just because of the unrealistic price he's demanding, but also > because a condition of the sale is to retain the Trump name on the > property. Eventually he'll have to sell it at a much lower price than > he's asking, and remove the condition that the buyer retain the Trump > name, or the bank will foreclose. Or perhaps Sheldon Adelson will step > in and bail him out and buy the property and keep the Trump name on the > hotel, though that will negatively affect bookings. Sheldon Adelson died on January 11. So the bail out isn't coming from that corner. Perhaps Robert & his daughter Rebekah Mercer, the money behind Breitbart might step up. -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-20 09:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ru9p6j$8mf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73832 |
On 1/20/2021 8:33 AM, Savageduck wrote: <snip> > Sheldon Adelson died on January 11. So the bail out isn't coming from that > corner. Perhaps Robert & his daughter Rebekah Mercer, the money behind > Breitbart might step up. Geez, I missed that. But his company still exists and I think that his wife was a co-conspirator and could continue his legacy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-20 21:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rua6q6$be4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73829 |
sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote: > On 1/20/2021 12:07 AM, Chris wrote: >> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 01/18/2021 06:10 AM, Mayayana wrote: >>>> "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >>>> >>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into the white >>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, that he was >>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>> | >>>> >>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >>>> just another dirty lie. >>> >>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted for him >>> because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he wasn't a >>> Democrat. I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger >>> military, a pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already >>> here, and the elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama introduced. >>> Instead I got inane tweets. Still, he's not Hillary. >> >> Trump is a brand. He sold the brand to his voters and all they got were >> slogans. His whole presidency was a grift to fill his pockets and improve >> his brand. Unfortunately for him, he didn't realise that it came with >> responsibility and consequences. He's now seriously damaged (hopefully >> fatally) his brand. No-one wants anything to do with him. He's also too >> afraid to go back to NY and is going to hide in Florida. Although, who >> knows how long for as his neighbours have already made it clear he's not >> allowed to reside at Mar-a-lago. > > Amusingly, his efforts to sell his hotel in D.C. have been unsuccessful, > not just because of the unrealistic price he's demanding, but also > because a condition of the sale is to retain the Trump name on the > property. Eventually he'll have to sell it at a much lower price than > he's asking, and remove the condition that the buyer retain the Trump > name, or the bank will foreclose. Or perhaps Sheldon Adelson will step > in and bail him out and buy the property and keep the Trump name on the > hotel, though that will negatively affect bookings. He's going to have a really hard time trying to cash in on his what should have been his Presidential "bonus". He's also got that huge loan with Deutsche Bank which is due in a couple of years. He'll probably be able to con his followers into giving him money.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-20 15:46 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q72dnVVrVOk0OZX9nZ2dnUU7-cfNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #73846 |
On Jan 20, 2021 at 1:20:06 PM PST, "Chris" <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: > sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote: >> On 1/20/2021 12:07 AM, Chris wrote: >>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 01/18/2021 06:10 AM, Mayayana wrote: >>>>> "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >>>>> >>>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into the white >>>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, that he was >>>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>>> | >>>>> >>>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >>>>> just another dirty lie. >>>> >>>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted for him >>>> because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he wasn't a >>>> Democrat. I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger >>>> military, a pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already >>>> here, and the elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama introduced. >>>> Instead I got inane tweets. Still, he's not Hillary. >>> >>> Trump is a brand. He sold the brand to his voters and all they got were >>> slogans. His whole presidency was a grift to fill his pockets and improve >>> his brand. Unfortunately for him, he didn't realise that it came with >>> responsibility and consequences. He's now seriously damaged (hopefully >>> fatally) his brand. No-one wants anything to do with him. He's also too >>> afraid to go back to NY and is going to hide in Florida. Although, who >>> knows how long for as his neighbours have already made it clear he's not >>> allowed to reside at Mar-a-lago. >> >> Amusingly, his efforts to sell his hotel in D.C. have been unsuccessful, >> not just because of the unrealistic price he's demanding, but also >> because a condition of the sale is to retain the Trump name on the >> property. Eventually he'll have to sell it at a much lower price than >> he's asking, and remove the condition that the buyer retain the Trump >> name, or the bank will foreclose. Or perhaps Sheldon Adelson will step >> in and bail him out and buy the property and keep the Trump name on the >> hotel, though that will negatively affect bookings. > > He's going to have a really hard time trying to cash in on his what should > have been his Presidential "bonus". He's also got that huge loan with > Deutsche Bank which is due in a couple of years. He'll probably be able to > con his followers into giving him money. The Deutsche Bank loan is due in a few months, and is $400M+. Also his donations, and merchandise sales have been stifled since Stripe (Payment processing software <https://stripe.com>), and Shopify (e-commerce & merchandizing platform <https://www.shopify.com>) have cut him off. -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-20 14:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rua9sa$voi$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73855 |
On 1/20/2021 1:46 PM, Savageduck wrote: <snip> > The Deutsche Bank loan is due in a few months, and is $400M+. > > Also his donations, and merchandise sales have been stifled since Stripe > (Payment processing software <https://stripe.com>), and Shopify (e-commerce & > merchandizing platform <https://www.shopify.com>) have cut him off Someone will bail him out. Or he can sell some of his money-losing properties at a loss, and still raise enough. He's never been much of a businessman, his usual methodology is to declare bankruptcy, of which he's already had six, and screwing the creditors. A few more would be no big deal. There's also the possibility of someone like Sheldon Adelson's widow bailing him out, $400 million would be pocket change to her.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 10:52 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6ru2oFldtbU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73859 |
sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote > Savageduck wrote >> The Deutsche Bank loan is due in a few months, and is $400M+. >> Also his donations, and merchandise sales have been stifled since Stripe >> (Payment processing software <https://stripe.com>), and Shopify >> (e-commerce & >> merchandizing platform <https://www.shopify.com>) have cut him off > Someone will bail him out. Or he can sell some of his money-losing > properties at a loss, and still raise enough. Doesn’t need to given that they arent collateral for those loans. > He's never been much of a businessman, his usual methodology is to declare > bankruptcy, of which he's already had six, and screwing the creditors. And is free to do that again and Deutsche Bank gets to like that or lump it. > A few more would be no big deal. Precisely. > There's also the possibility of someone like Sheldon Adelson's widow > bailing him out, $400 million would be pocket change to her.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 10:46 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6rtn1FlbvlU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73855 |
"Savageduck" <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> wrote in message news:q72dnVVrVOk0OZX9nZ2dnUU7-cfNnZ2d@giganews.com... > On Jan 20, 2021 at 1:20:06 PM PST, "Chris" <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: > >> sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote: >>> On 1/20/2021 12:07 AM, Chris wrote: >>>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 01/18/2021 06:10 AM, Mayayana wrote: >>>>>> "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into the >>>>>> white >>>>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, that >>>>>> he was >>>>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>>>> | >>>>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>>>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >>>>>> just another dirty lie. >>>>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted for >>>>> him >>>>> because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he wasn't a >>>>> Democrat. I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger >>>>> military, a pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already >>>>> here, and the elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama >>>>> introduced. >>>>> Instead I got inane tweets. Still, he's not Hillary. >>>> Trump is a brand. He sold the brand to his voters and all they got >>>> were >>>> slogans. His whole presidency was a grift to fill his pockets and >>>> improve >>>> his brand. Unfortunately for him, he didn't realise that it came with >>>> responsibility and consequences. He's now seriously damaged (hopefully >>>> fatally) his brand. No-one wants anything to do with him. He's also >>>> too >>>> afraid to go back to NY and is going to hide in Florida. Although, who >>>> knows how long for as his neighbours have already made it clear he's >>>> not >>>> allowed to reside at Mar-a-lago. >>> Amusingly, his efforts to sell his hotel in D.C. have been >>> unsuccessful, not just because of the unrealistic price he's demanding, >>> but also because a condition of the sale is to retain the Trump name on >>> the property. Eventually he'll have to sell it at a much lower price >>> than he's asking, and remove the condition that the buyer retain the >>> Trump name, or the bank will foreclose. Or perhaps Sheldon Adelson will >>> step in and bail him out and buy the property and keep the Trump name on >>> the hotel, though that will negatively affect bookings. >> >> He's going to have a really hard time trying to cash in on his what >> should >> have been his Presidential "bonus". He's also got that huge loan with >> Deutsche Bank which is due in a couple of years. He'll probably be able >> to >> con his followers into giving him money. > > The Deutsche Bank loan is due in a few months, and is $400M+. And they have fuck all collateral for those loans and get to wear the loss. > Also his donations, and merchandise sales have been stifled since Stripe > (Payment processing software <https://stripe.com>), and Shopify > (e-commerce & > merchandizing platform <https://www.shopify.com>) have cut him off. Plenty wont, you watch,
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-20 16:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ruah5r$e0o$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73869 |
On 2021-01-20 3:46 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > > "Savageduck" <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> wrote in message > news:q72dnVVrVOk0OZX9nZ2dnUU7-cfNnZ2d@giganews.com... >> On Jan 20, 2021 at 1:20:06 PM PST, "Chris" <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote: >>>> On 1/20/2021 12:07 AM, Chris wrote: >>>>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 01/18/2021 06:10 AM, Mayayana wrote: >>>>>>> "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into >>>>>>> the white >>>>>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, >>>>>>> that he was >>>>>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>>>>> | >>>>>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>>>>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >>>>>>> just another dirty lie. >>>>>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted >>>>>> for him >>>>>> because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he wasn't a >>>>>> Democrat. I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger >>>>>> military, a pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already >>>>>> here, and the elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama >>>>>> introduced. >>>>>> Instead I got inane tweets. Still, he's not Hillary. >>>>> Trump is a brand. He sold the brand to his voters and all they got >>>>> were >>>>> slogans. His whole presidency was a grift to fill his pockets and >>>>> improve >>>>> his brand. Unfortunately for him, he didn't realise that it came with >>>>> responsibility and consequences. He's now seriously damaged >>>>> (hopefully >>>>> fatally) his brand. No-one wants anything to do with him. He's >>>>> also too >>>>> afraid to go back to NY and is going to hide in Florida. Although, >>>>> who >>>>> knows how long for as his neighbours have already made it clear >>>>> he's not >>>>> allowed to reside at Mar-a-lago. >>>> Amusingly, his efforts to sell his hotel in D.C. have been >>>> unsuccessful, not just because of the unrealistic price he's >>>> demanding, but also because a condition of the sale is to retain the >>>> Trump name on the property. Eventually he'll have to sell it at a >>>> much lower price than he's asking, and remove the condition that the >>>> buyer retain the Trump name, or the bank will foreclose. Or perhaps >>>> Sheldon Adelson will step in and bail him out and buy the property >>>> and keep the Trump name on the hotel, though that will negatively >>>> affect bookings. >>> >>> He's going to have a really hard time trying to cash in on his what >>> should >>> have been his Presidential "bonus". He's also got that huge loan with >>> Deutsche Bank which is due in a couple of years. He'll probably be >>> able to >>> con his followers into giving him money. >> >> The Deutsche Bank loan is due in a few months, and is $400M+. > > And they have fuck all collateral for those loans and get to wear the loss. And now you're magically privy to Trump's financial status!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 11:24 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6rvupFlp28U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73874 |
"Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message news:ruah5r$e0o$3@dont-email.me... > On 2021-01-20 3:46 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "Savageduck" <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> wrote in message >> news:q72dnVVrVOk0OZX9nZ2dnUU7-cfNnZ2d@giganews.com... >>> On Jan 20, 2021 at 1:20:06 PM PST, "Chris" <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 1/20/2021 12:07 AM, Chris wrote: >>>>>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 01/18/2021 06:10 AM, Mayayana wrote: >>>>>>>> "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into the >>>>>>>> white >>>>>>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, >>>>>>>> that he was >>>>>>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>>>>>> | >>>>>>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>>>>>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >>>>>>>> just another dirty lie. >>>>>>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted >>>>>>> for him >>>>>>> because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he wasn't a >>>>>>> Democrat. I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger >>>>>>> military, a pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already >>>>>>> here, and the elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama >>>>>>> introduced. >>>>>>> Instead I got inane tweets. Still, he's not Hillary. >>>>>> Trump is a brand. He sold the brand to his voters and all they got >>>>>> were >>>>>> slogans. His whole presidency was a grift to fill his pockets and >>>>>> improve >>>>>> his brand. Unfortunately for him, he didn't realise that it came >>>>>> with >>>>>> responsibility and consequences. He's now seriously damaged >>>>>> (hopefully >>>>>> fatally) his brand. No-one wants anything to do with him. He's also >>>>>> too >>>>>> afraid to go back to NY and is going to hide in Florida. Although, >>>>>> who >>>>>> knows how long for as his neighbours have already made it clear he's >>>>>> not >>>>>> allowed to reside at Mar-a-lago. >>>>> Amusingly, his efforts to sell his hotel in D.C. have been >>>>> unsuccessful, not just because of the unrealistic price he's >>>>> demanding, but also because a condition of the sale is to retain the >>>>> Trump name on the property. Eventually he'll have to sell it at a much >>>>> lower price than he's asking, and remove the condition that the buyer >>>>> retain the Trump name, or the bank will foreclose. Or perhaps Sheldon >>>>> Adelson will step in and bail him out and buy the property and keep >>>>> the Trump name on the hotel, though that will negatively affect >>>>> bookings. >>>> >>>> He's going to have a really hard time trying to cash in on his what >>>> should >>>> have been his Presidential "bonus". He's also got that huge loan with >>>> Deutsche Bank which is due in a couple of years. He'll probably be able >>>> to >>>> con his followers into giving him money. >>> >>> The Deutsche Bank loan is due in a few months, and is $400M+. >> >> And they have fuck all collateral for those loans and get to wear the >> loss. > > And now you're magically privy to Trump's financial status! Don’t need to be, just like he doesn’t need to be to know that that dollar amount is due soon.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-20 16:44 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ruaipe$k58$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73877 |
On 2021-01-20 4:24 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > > "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message > news:ruah5r$e0o$3@dont-email.me... >> On 2021-01-20 3:46 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Savageduck" <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> wrote in message >>> news:q72dnVVrVOk0OZX9nZ2dnUU7-cfNnZ2d@giganews.com... >>>> On Jan 20, 2021 at 1:20:06 PM PST, "Chris" <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 1/20/2021 12:07 AM, Chris wrote: >>>>>>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 01/18/2021 06:10 AM, Mayayana wrote: >>>>>>>>> "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into >>>>>>>>> the white >>>>>>>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, >>>>>>>>> that he was >>>>>>>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>>>>>>> | >>>>>>>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>>>>>>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >>>>>>>>> just another dirty lie. >>>>>>>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I >>>>>>>> voted for him >>>>>>>> because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he >>>>>>>> wasn't a >>>>>>>> Democrat. I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger >>>>>>>> military, a pathway to legality for the foreigners who were >>>>>>>> already >>>>>>>> here, and the elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama >>>>>>>> introduced. >>>>>>>> Instead I got inane tweets. Still, he's not Hillary. >>>>>>> Trump is a brand. He sold the brand to his voters and all they >>>>>>> got were >>>>>>> slogans. His whole presidency was a grift to fill his pockets >>>>>>> and improve >>>>>>> his brand. Unfortunately for him, he didn't realise that it came >>>>>>> with >>>>>>> responsibility and consequences. He's now seriously damaged >>>>>>> (hopefully >>>>>>> fatally) his brand. No-one wants anything to do with him. He's >>>>>>> also too >>>>>>> afraid to go back to NY and is going to hide in Florida. >>>>>>> Although, who >>>>>>> knows how long for as his neighbours have already made it clear >>>>>>> he's not >>>>>>> allowed to reside at Mar-a-lago. >>>>>> Amusingly, his efforts to sell his hotel in D.C. have been >>>>>> unsuccessful, not just because of the unrealistic price he's >>>>>> demanding, but also because a condition of the sale is to retain >>>>>> the Trump name on the property. Eventually he'll have to sell it >>>>>> at a much lower price than he's asking, and remove the condition >>>>>> that the buyer retain the Trump name, or the bank will foreclose. >>>>>> Or perhaps Sheldon Adelson will step in and bail him out and buy >>>>>> the property and keep the Trump name on the hotel, though that >>>>>> will negatively affect bookings. >>>>> >>>>> He's going to have a really hard time trying to cash in on his what >>>>> should >>>>> have been his Presidential "bonus". He's also got that huge loan with >>>>> Deutsche Bank which is due in a couple of years. He'll probably be >>>>> able to >>>>> con his followers into giving him money. >>>> >>>> The Deutsche Bank loan is due in a few months, and is $400M+. >>> >>> And they have fuck all collateral for those loans and get to wear the >>> loss. >> >> And now you're magically privy to Trump's financial status! > > Don’t need to be, just like he doesn’t need to > be to know that that dollar amount is due soon. Yet you're the one who claimed the loans have no collateral... ...or are you going to claim I'm misquoting you about that?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 11:55 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6s1p5Fm2nbU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73880 |
"Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message news:ruaipe$k58$3@dont-email.me... > On 2021-01-20 4:24 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >> news:ruah5r$e0o$3@dont-email.me... >>> On 2021-01-20 3:46 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Savageduck" <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> wrote in message >>>> news:q72dnVVrVOk0OZX9nZ2dnUU7-cfNnZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>> On Jan 20, 2021 at 1:20:06 PM PST, "Chris" <ithinkiam@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/20/2021 12:07 AM, Chris wrote: >>>>>>>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 01/18/2021 06:10 AM, Mayayana wrote: >>>>>>>>>> "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into >>>>>>>>>> the white >>>>>>>>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, >>>>>>>>>> that he was >>>>>>>>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>>>>>>>> | >>>>>>>>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>>>>>>>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >>>>>>>>>> just another dirty lie. >>>>>>>>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted >>>>>>>>> for him >>>>>>>>> because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he wasn't >>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>> Democrat. I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger >>>>>>>>> military, a pathway to legality for the foreigners who were >>>>>>>>> already >>>>>>>>> here, and the elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama >>>>>>>>> introduced. >>>>>>>>> Instead I got inane tweets. Still, he's not Hillary. >>>>>>>> Trump is a brand. He sold the brand to his voters and all they got >>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>> slogans. His whole presidency was a grift to fill his pockets and >>>>>>>> improve >>>>>>>> his brand. Unfortunately for him, he didn't realise that it came >>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>> responsibility and consequences. He's now seriously damaged >>>>>>>> (hopefully >>>>>>>> fatally) his brand. No-one wants anything to do with him. He's >>>>>>>> also too >>>>>>>> afraid to go back to NY and is going to hide in Florida. Although, >>>>>>>> who >>>>>>>> knows how long for as his neighbours have already made it clear >>>>>>>> he's not >>>>>>>> allowed to reside at Mar-a-lago. >>>>>>> Amusingly, his efforts to sell his hotel in D.C. have been >>>>>>> unsuccessful, not just because of the unrealistic price he's >>>>>>> demanding, but also because a condition of the sale is to retain the >>>>>>> Trump name on the property. Eventually he'll have to sell it at a >>>>>>> much lower price than he's asking, and remove the condition that the >>>>>>> buyer retain the Trump name, or the bank will foreclose. Or perhaps >>>>>>> Sheldon Adelson will step in and bail him out and buy the property >>>>>>> and keep the Trump name on the hotel, though that will negatively >>>>>>> affect bookings. >>>>>> >>>>>> He's going to have a really hard time trying to cash in on his what >>>>>> should >>>>>> have been his Presidential "bonus". He's also got that huge loan with >>>>>> Deutsche Bank which is due in a couple of years. He'll probably be >>>>>> able to >>>>>> con his followers into giving him money. >>>>> >>>>> The Deutsche Bank loan is due in a few months, and is $400M+. >>>> >>>> And they have fuck all collateral for those loans and get to wear the >>>> loss. >>> >>> And now you're magically privy to Trump's financial status! >> >> Don’t need to be, just like he doesn’t need to >> be to know that that dollar amount is due soon. > > Yet you're the one who claimed the loans have no collateral... I said fuck all collateral,, not no capital, and don’t need to be privy to Trump's financial status to know that either. Trump's financial status is irrelevant to what collateral there is for those particular loans due soon. And my source for that is just as good as his, fuckwit. > ...or are you going to claim I'm misquoting you about that? You clearly did just that and were stupid enough to leave the original this time too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-20 17:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ruakvt$2gd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73885 |
On 2021-01-20 4:55 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > > "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>>>>>> He's going to have a really hard time trying to cash in on his >>>>>>> what should >>>>>>> have been his Presidential "bonus". He's also got that huge loan >>>>>>> with >>>>>>> Deutsche Bank which is due in a couple of years. He'll probably >>>>>>> be able to >>>>>>> con his followers into giving him money. >>>>>> >>>>>> The Deutsche Bank loan is due in a few months, and is $400M+. >>>>> >>>>> And they have fuck all collateral for those loans and get to wear >>>>> the loss. >>>> >>>> And now you're magically privy to Trump's financial status! >>> >>> Don’t need to be, just like he doesn’t need to >>> be to know that that dollar amount is due soon. >> >> Yet you're the one who claimed the loans have no collateral... > > I said fuck all collateral,, not no capital, and don’t need > to be privy to Trump's financial status to know that either. So "fuck all" as a saying is different from "no" in this context... ...how exactly? > > Trump's financial status is irrelevant to what collateral > there is for those particular loans due soon. And my > source for that is just as good as his, fuckwit. He doesn't need a source, sunshine. You accepted what he DID claim which was about loans coming due and nothing about collateral at all. You're really bad at this, aren't you? > >> ...or are you going to claim I'm misquoting you about that? > > You clearly did just that and were stupid enough to leave the original > this time too. I used a neutral term in place of your hyperbole. I didn't change the meaning of what you claimed one iota.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 12:54 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6s57oFmmfeU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73886 |
"Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message news:ruakvt$2gd$1@dont-email.me... > On 2021-01-20 4:55 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message > >>>>>>>> He's going to have a really hard time trying to cash in on his what >>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>> have been his Presidential "bonus". He's also got that huge loan >>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>> Deutsche Bank which is due in a couple of years. He'll probably be >>>>>>>> able to >>>>>>>> con his followers into giving him money. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The Deutsche Bank loan is due in a few months, and is $400M+. >>>>>> >>>>>> And they have fuck all collateral for those loans and get to wear the >>>>>> loss. >>>>> >>>>> And now you're magically privy to Trump's financial status! >>>> >>>> Don’t need to be, just like he doesn’t need to >>>> be to know that that dollar amount is due soon. >>> >>> Yet you're the one who claimed the loans have no collateral... >> >> I said fuck all collateral,, not no capital, and don’t need >> to be privy to Trump's financial status to know that either. > So "fuck all" as a saying is different from "no" in this context... Yep. >> Trump's financial status is irrelevant to what collateral >> there is for those particular loans due soon. And my >> source for that is just as good as his, fuckwit. > > He doesn't need a source, sunshine. I don’t either, shitshine. > You accepted what he DID claim which was about loans coming due Nope, I knew that already, from months ago. > and nothing about collateral at all. Pity about what I came across months ago. <reams of your shit any 3 year old could leave for dead flushed where it belongs> >>> ...or are you going to claim I'm misquoting you about that? >> >> You clearly did just that and were stupid enough to leave the original >> this time too. > I used a neutral term in place of your hyperbole. There is no hyperbole in what I said, its fact. > I didn't change the meaning of what you claimed one iota. You never could bullshit and lie your way out of a wet paper bag.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-20 18:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ruank6$fbe$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73889 |
On 2021-01-20 5:54 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > > "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message > news:ruakvt$2gd$1@dont-email.me... >> On 2021-01-20 4:55 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >> >>>>>>>>> He's going to have a really hard time trying to cash in on his >>>>>>>>> what should >>>>>>>>> have been his Presidential "bonus". He's also got that huge >>>>>>>>> loan with >>>>>>>>> Deutsche Bank which is due in a couple of years. He'll probably >>>>>>>>> be able to >>>>>>>>> con his followers into giving him money. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Deutsche Bank loan is due in a few months, and is $400M+. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And they have fuck all collateral for those loans and get to wear >>>>>>> the loss. >>>>>> >>>>>> And now you're magically privy to Trump's financial status! >>>>> >>>>> Don’t need to be, just like he doesn’t need to >>>>> be to know that that dollar amount is due soon. >>>> >>>> Yet you're the one who claimed the loans have no collateral... >>> >>> I said fuck all collateral,, not no capital, and don’t need >>> to be privy to Trump's financial status to know that either. > >> So "fuck all" as a saying is different from "no" in this context... > > Yep. > >>> Trump's financial status is irrelevant to what collateral >>> there is for those particular loans due soon. And my >>> source for that is just as good as his, fuckwit. >> >> He doesn't need a source, sunshine. > > I don’t either, shitshine. Yeah... ...you do. Because you made a claim that I DON'T accept. > >> You accepted what he DID claim which was about loans coming due > > Nope, I knew that already, from months ago. Right. And them went on to claim that those loans had "fuck all collateral". That's a claim. > >> and nothing about collateral at all. > > Pity about what I came across months ago. Which you won't present here for what reason? > > <reams of your shit any 3 year old could > leave for dead flushed where it belongs> > >>>> ...or are you going to claim I'm misquoting you about that? >>> >>> You clearly did just that and were stupid enough to leave the >>> original this time too. > >> I used a neutral term in place of your hyperbole. > > There is no hyperbole in what I said, its fact. Your support for that claim is where? > >> I didn't change the meaning of what you claimed one iota. > > You never could bullshit and lie your way out of a wet paper bag. LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-21 13:41 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6s7ujFn68fU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73892 |
"Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message news:ruank6$fbe$3@dont-email.me... > On 2021-01-20 5:54 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >> news:ruakvt$2gd$1@dont-email.me... >>> On 2021-01-20 4:55 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message >>> >>>>>>>>>> He's going to have a really hard time trying to cash in on his >>>>>>>>>> what should >>>>>>>>>> have been his Presidential "bonus". He's also got that huge loan >>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>> Deutsche Bank which is due in a couple of years. He'll probably >>>>>>>>>> be able to >>>>>>>>>> con his followers into giving him money. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Deutsche Bank loan is due in a few months, and is $400M+. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And they have fuck all collateral for those loans and get to wear >>>>>>>> the loss. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And now you're magically privy to Trump's financial status! >>>>>> >>>>>> Don’t need to be, just like he doesn’t need to >>>>>> be to know that that dollar amount is due soon. >>>>> >>>>> Yet you're the one who claimed the loans have no collateral... >>>> >>>> I said fuck all collateral,, not no capital, and don’t need >>>> to be privy to Trump's financial status to know that either. >> >>> So "fuck all" as a saying is different from "no" in this context... >> >> Yep. >> >>>> Trump's financial status is irrelevant to what collateral >>>> there is for those particular loans due soon. And my >>>> source for that is just as good as his, fuckwit. >>> >>> He doesn't need a source, sunshine. >> >> I don’t either, shitshine. > > Yeah... ...you do. > > Because you made a claim that I DON'T accept. You have always been, and always will be completely and utterly irrelevant. What you may or may not accept in spades. You are free to research that yourself if you don’t accept it. I don’t bother to save everything I read just in case some pathological liar doesn’t accept it when I state it. >>> You accepted what he DID claim which was about loans coming due >> >> Nope, I knew that already, from months ago. > > Right. And them went on to claim that those loans had "fuck all > collateral". Nope, state that. > That's a claim. Nope, a statement of fact. >>> and nothing about collateral at all. >> >> Pity about what I came across months ago. > > Which you won't present here for what reason? I don’t bother to save everything I read just in case some pathological liar doesn’t accept it when I state it. You are free to research that if you don’t believe it. >> <reams of your shit any 3 year old could >> leave for dead flushed where it belongs> >> >>>>> ...or are you going to claim I'm misquoting you about that? >>>> >>>> You clearly did just that and were stupid enough to leave the original >>>> this time too. >> >>> I used a neutral term in place of your hyperbole. >> >> There is no hyperbole in what I said, its fact. > > Your support for that claim is where? Don’t need any, you are free to research that if you don’t believe it. >>> I didn't change the meaning of what you claimed one iota. >> >> You never could bullshit and lie your way out of a wet paper bag. > > LOL! Village eejut imitations cut no mustard, fuckwit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 14 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 … 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web