Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #73228 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-01-09 10:11 +0000 |
| Last post | 2021-01-10 10:58 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 391 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 10:11 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Dieter Britz <dieterhansbritz@gmail.com> - 2021-01-09 13:01 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-09 08:16 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 09:34 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-09 12:35 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 11:09 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:49 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:34 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-09 12:41 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 17:47 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-09 14:29 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-09 12:56 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-09 21:29 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 21:03 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:24 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2021-01-09 08:58 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:27 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-09 12:38 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 09:12 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2021-01-09 18:03 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 12:16 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:53 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-10 11:45 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 14:03 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 09:54 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 17:02 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 12:26 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 12:20 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 15:20 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 23:29 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 10:38 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 17:40 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 12:52 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 20:08 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 14:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 13:51 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 05:45 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 09:38 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 03:26 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 19:56 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 07:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-14 10:15 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-14 18:42 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 16:39 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2021-01-11 09:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-11 10:27 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 22:44 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 19:00 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-11 10:27 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-11 17:51 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 13:33 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 08:40 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 20:22 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 10:53 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 18:01 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 12:59 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 20:08 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 14:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 20:19 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 15:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-12 22:51 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-13 02:36 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-13 16:19 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 10:56 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-11 16:34 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-11 10:35 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-11 19:24 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 04:39 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:39 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:29 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Dieter Britz <dieterhansbritz@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:38 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-10 08:55 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 15:41 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 21:48 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-10 19:47 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-11 15:22 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 13:35 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 10:05 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-11 16:20 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-11 13:05 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-11 18:15 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 21:48 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 10:13 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 15:23 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 15:47 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-12 13:11 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-12 15:02 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-12 15:17 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 10:19 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-12 08:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-12 13:41 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 05:51 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people KenW <ken1943@invalid.net> - 2021-01-12 15:58 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-12 18:15 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 07:46 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 21:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-13 02:36 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 14:31 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-12 14:47 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 15:26 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 19:46 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-01-13 08:07 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 08:37 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-13 12:31 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:49 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 11:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-13 16:07 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 18:57 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 21:39 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 22:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 06:02 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 21:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-18 09:10 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 08:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:06 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 12:51 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 09:58 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-18 18:24 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-20 00:18 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-18 18:23 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 14:14 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 13:21 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:42 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 16:16 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 09:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 14:23 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 14:21 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 10:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 15:27 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:13 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:27 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 13:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 15:46 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 09:19 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 13:03 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:25 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 13:38 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-20 21:44 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:44 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-21 19:19 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 11:39 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:52 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:55 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:48 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 22:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:50 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 15:30 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-20 21:46 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:48 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-21 19:20 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 08:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:59 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 15:19 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 16:35 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:40 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 14:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 16:17 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 14:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 17:46 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 10:23 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:42 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 14:20 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 17:46 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 10:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 15:28 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:28 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:47 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Leo <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2021-01-18 20:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 20:42 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 17:45 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:18 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-20 00:28 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 23:42 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 17:43 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-19 11:24 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 05:39 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 08:07 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 19:33 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 11:35 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 15:37 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 14:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 14:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 19:54 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 20:00 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:33 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-21 05:46 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 03:05 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 10:29 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:44 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:00 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:20 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:35 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 10:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:13 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-21 17:27 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:48 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 15:04 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 10:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 19:25 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 14:33 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 11:57 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:20 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 19:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 19:28 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 20:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 22:09 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 12:01 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:25 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 14:29 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 19:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 15:02 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 11:50 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 12:01 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:31 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:47 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-22 10:06 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 09:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 10:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:36 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 13:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:08 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:35 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 11:43 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:46 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 03:02 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:23 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-21 06:06 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:42 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:15 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:47 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 12:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:04 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:20 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:53 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:19 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 19:59 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 15:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 10:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:33 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 07:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 10:33 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 09:27 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 21:20 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 15:46 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 14:12 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:52 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:24 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:44 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:55 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 17:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 12:54 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:07 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:41 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 19:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:32 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 13:09 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 12:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 15:19 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 14:46 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-13 16:14 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:53 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 16:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 22:19 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 14:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-13 13:49 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 13:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:40 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 08:15 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Hergen Lehmann <hlehmann.expires.5-11@snafu.de> - 2021-01-13 22:09 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-13 20:17 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bernd Froehlich <befr@eaglesoft.de> - 2021-01-14 08:02 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 09:43 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-14 07:49 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-14 14:43 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-14 23:53 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 12:15 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 14:34 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 21:28 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-14 17:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 23:02 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 19:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 12:17 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:50 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 13:17 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:34 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:10 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:21 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 13:37 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:41 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:23 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:43 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:51 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:54 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 12:50 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:21 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:13 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 19:50 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-15 06:39 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 18:38 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-15 22:29 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 16:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-15 08:28 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 18:42 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-15 22:29 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 16:16 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-15 21:37 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 17:24 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-15 23:00 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 19:29 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 01:04 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 20:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 11:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 08:48 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 14:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 10:24 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 15:43 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 13:25 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 19:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 16:31 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 23:57 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 19:21 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-17 13:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-17 16:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 11:54 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 13:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:44 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2021-01-16 09:59 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 21:08 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 09:08 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2021-01-16 02:49 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 04:51 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 12:07 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 08:37 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 14:01 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:59 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 13:07 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-18 12:24 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:43 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-16 16:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-15 07:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 03:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-15 11:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 08:07 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 13:06 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 04:16 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-12 22:27 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 11:16 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-13 02:36 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:13 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 15:19 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 07:53 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 13:35 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:58 +0000
Page 7 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 20 Next page →
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-18 09:58 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ru4i8h$g6u$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73733 |
On 2021-01-18 9:06 a.m., The Real Bev wrote: > On 01/18/2021 06:10 AM, Mayayana wrote: >> "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >> >> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into the white >> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, that he >> was >> | not capable of handling the job. >> | >> >> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >> just another dirty lie. > > I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted for him > because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he wasn't a > Democrat. I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger > military, a pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already > here, and the elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama introduced. > Instead I got inane tweets. Still, he's not Hillary. > And that, in a nutshell, is what is wrong with your political "philosophy". >> Lindsey Graham is now blaming Pelosi for the Capitol >> mob, just days after denouncing Trump. Others are blaming >> BLM or Antifa. Meanwhile some don't deny it but say they >> attacked the building because Trump told them to. And Bev >> defends treason as an established right defined in the >> Constitution. > > It's only treason if you lose. This wasn't an insurrection, it was a > stupid mob doing stupid destructive shit for its own sake. An > insurrection would have had an actual goal and worked a little better. For Trump's sake. He lied to them for months, then paid to gather them, incited them and sent them off. > > If this was an insurrection, then so were the BLM riots -- although > those rioters at least got new shoes and big TVs for their efforts. Nope. Simply wrong.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-18 18:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <i6m230Fgih7U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73739 |
On 2021-01-18, Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote: >> >> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted for >> him because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he wasn't >> a Democrat. I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger >> military, a pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already >> here, and the elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama >> introduced. Instead I got inane tweets. Still, he's not Hillary. > > And that, in a nutshell, is what is wrong with your political > "philosophy". Fucking yourself and everyone else in your own country to own the libs. Masterminds. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-20 00:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ru7srv$12no$1@neodome.net> |
| In reply to | #73744 |
Jolly Roger wrote: > On 2021-01-18, Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote: >>> >>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted for >>> him because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he wasn't >>> a Democrat. I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger >>> military, a pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already >>> here, and the elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama >>> introduced. Instead I got inane tweets. Still, he's not Hillary. >> >> And that, in a nutshell, is what is wrong with your political >> "philosophy". > > Fucking yourself and everyone else in your own country to own the libs. > Masterminds. > Give five legitimate examples.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-18 18:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <i6m207Fgih7U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73733 |
On 2021-01-18, The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted for > him because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he wasn't > a Democrat. I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger > military, a pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already > here, and the elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama > introduced. Instead I got inane tweets. Still, he's not Hillary. Sucker. Good job, dingus. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-18 14:14 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <Fq6dnZo-gYyRcZj9nZ2dnUU7-QfNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #73733 |
On Jan 18, 2021 at 9:06:59 AM PST, "The Real Bev" <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: > On 01/18/2021 06:10 AM, Mayayana wrote: >> "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >> >> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into the white >> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, that he was >> | not capable of handling the job. >> | >> >> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >> just another dirty lie. > > I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted for him > because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he wasn't a > Democrat. It wasn't stupid people he pissed off. The stupid people seemed to be quite happy with him. > I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger > military, a pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already > here, and the elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama introduced. You got what you voted for, and the Obama shit he eliminated wasn't that stupid. > > Instead I got inane tweets. Now those were mostly, ...er, all stupid. > Still, he's not Hillary. No kidding. > >> Lindsey Graham is now blaming Pelosi for the Capitol >> mob, just days after denouncing Trump. Others are blaming >> BLM or Antifa. Meanwhile some don't deny it but say they >> attacked the building because Trump told them to. And Bev >> defends treason as an established right defined in the >> Constitution. > > It's only treason if you lose. This wasn't an insurrection, it was a > stupid mob doing stupid destructive shit for its own sake. An > insurrection would have had an actual goal and worked a little better. Actually it was an insurrection, and they did have an actual goal, reversing a legal, & Constitutional election, because the election didn't go their way. As for working a little bit better, that is what you get from a mob of cult followers. > > If this was an insurrection, then so were the BLM riots -- although > those rioters at least got new shoes and big TVs for their efforts. Actually the BLM protests/riots were not in anyway close to being an insurrection. They were not trying to overthrow a duly elected government, they were protesting racially motivated injustice. > > >> It was actually Ted Kennedy and his family who attacked >> the Capitol. The fake media are trying to cover it up by >> claiming Ted Kennedy is dead. I'm not fooled! > > "If Mary Jo had been able to float I'd be President today." -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-19 07:49 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6maisFign2U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73746 |
"Savageduck" <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> wrote in message news:Fq6dnZo-gYyRcZj9nZ2dnUU7-QfNnZ2d@giganews.com... > On Jan 18, 2021 at 9:06:59 AM PST, "The Real Bev" <bashley101@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On 01/18/2021 06:10 AM, Mayayana wrote: >>> "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >>> >>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into the white >>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, that he >>> was >>> | not capable of handling the job. >>> | >>> >>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >>> just another dirty lie. >> >> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted for him >> because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he wasn't a >> Democrat. > > It wasn't stupid people he pissed off. The stupid people seemed to be > quite > happy with him. > >> I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger military, a >> pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already here, and the >> elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama introduced. > > You got what you voted for, and the Obama shit he eliminated wasn't that > stupid. >> >> Instead I got inane tweets. > > Now those were mostly, ...er, all stupid. > >> Still, he's not Hillary. > > No kidding. >> >>> Lindsey Graham is now blaming Pelosi for the Capitol >>> mob, just days after denouncing Trump. Others are blaming >>> BLM or Antifa. Meanwhile some don't deny it but say they >>> attacked the building because Trump told them to. And Bev >>> defends treason as an established right defined in the >>> Constitution. >> >> It's only treason if you lose. This wasn't an insurrection, it was a >> stupid mob doing stupid destructive shit for its own sake. An >> insurrection would have had an actual goal and worked a little better. > > Actually it was an insurrection, Nope, just a violent riot. > and they did have an actual goal, reversing a legal, & Constitutional > election, That doesn’t make it an insurrection, any more than a violent riot about Rowe v Wade would be. > because the election didn't go their way. Yes. > As for working a little bit better, that is what you get from a mob of > cult followers. >> If this was an insurrection, then so were the BLM riots -- although those >> rioters at least got new shoes and big TVs for their efforts. > Actually the BLM protests/riots were not in anyway close to being an > insurrection. They were not trying to overthrow a duly elected government, Neither was the capitol violent riot. > they were protesting racially motivated injustice. Nope, there was no injustice involved. They were in fact protesting when black criminals ended up with what they deserved. >>> It was actually Ted Kennedy and his family who attacked >>> the Capitol. The fake media are trying to cover it up by >>> claiming Ted Kennedy is dead. I'm not fooled! >> >> "If Mary Jo had been able to float I'd be President today."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-18 13:21 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ru4u4v$d9e$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73753 |
On 2021-01-18 12:49 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > > "Savageduck" <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> wrote in message > news:Fq6dnZo-gYyRcZj9nZ2dnUU7-QfNnZ2d@giganews.com... >> On Jan 18, 2021 at 9:06:59 AM PST, "The Real Bev" <bashley101@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 01/18/2021 06:10 AM, Mayayana wrote: >>>> "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >>>> >>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into the >>>> white >>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, that >>>> he was >>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>> | >>>> >>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >>>> just another dirty lie. >>> >>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted for >>> him because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he wasn't >>> a Democrat. >> >> It wasn't stupid people he pissed off. The stupid people seemed to be >> quite >> happy with him. >> >>> I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger military, a >>> pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already here, and the >>> elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama introduced. >> >> You got what you voted for, and the Obama shit he eliminated wasn't that >> stupid. >>> >>> Instead I got inane tweets. >> >> Now those were mostly, ...er, all stupid. >> >>> Still, he's not Hillary. >> >> No kidding. >>> >>>> Lindsey Graham is now blaming Pelosi for the Capitol >>>> mob, just days after denouncing Trump. Others are blaming >>>> BLM or Antifa. Meanwhile some don't deny it but say they >>>> attacked the building because Trump told them to. And Bev >>>> defends treason as an established right defined in the >>>> Constitution. >>> >>> It's only treason if you lose. This wasn't an insurrection, it was a >>> stupid mob doing stupid destructive shit for its own sake. An >>> insurrection would have had an actual goal and worked a little better. >> >> Actually it was an insurrection, > > Nope, just a violent riot. Where they came with zip-tie handcuffs... > >> and they did have an actual goal, reversing a legal, & Constitutional >> election, > > That doesn’t make it an insurrection, any more > than a violent riot about Rowe v Wade would be. > >> because the election didn't go their way. > > Yes. > >> As for working a little bit better, that is what you get from a mob of >> cult followers. > >>> If this was an insurrection, then so were the BLM riots -- although >>> those rioters at least got new shoes and big TVs for their efforts. > >> Actually the BLM protests/riots were not in anyway close to being an >> insurrection. They were not trying to overthrow a duly elected >> government, > > Neither was the capitol violent riot. Yes. They were trying to overturn the election to put the loser in power. That is textbook insurrection. > >> they were protesting racially motivated injustice. > > Nope, there was no injustice involved. > They were in fact protesting when black > criminals ended up with what they deserved. Really? Did Breona Taylor get what she deserved? What law had George Floyd broken when a police officer knelt on his neck for eight minutes until he died?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-19 08:42 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6mdm0Fj3dbU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73758 |
Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote > Rod Speed wrote >> Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> wrote >>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote >>>> Mayayana wrote >>>>> Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >>>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into the >>>>> white >>>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, that >>>>> he was >>>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>>> | >>>>> >>>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >>>>> just another dirty lie. >>>> >>>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted for >>>> him because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he wasn't a >>>> Democrat. >>> >>> It wasn't stupid people he pissed off. The stupid people seemed to be >>> quite >>> happy with him. >>> >>>> I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger military, a >>>> pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already here, and the >>>> elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama introduced. >>> >>> You got what you voted for, and the Obama shit he eliminated wasn't that >>> stupid. >>>> >>>> Instead I got inane tweets. >>> >>> Now those were mostly, ...er, all stupid. >>> >>>> Still, he's not Hillary. >>> >>> No kidding. >>>> >>>>> Lindsey Graham is now blaming Pelosi for the Capitol >>>>> mob, just days after denouncing Trump. Others are blaming >>>>> BLM or Antifa. Meanwhile some don't deny it but say they >>>>> attacked the building because Trump told them to. And Bev >>>>> defends treason as an established right defined in the >>>>> Constitution. >>>> >>>> It's only treason if you lose. This wasn't an insurrection, it was a >>>> stupid mob doing stupid destructive shit for its own sake. An >>>> insurrection would have had an actual goal and worked a little better. >>> >>> Actually it was an insurrection, >> >> Nope, just a violent riot. > > Where they came with zip-tie handcuffs... Only one individual did that, and even someone as stupid as you should have noticed that they arent the ideal way to kill all the Congress critters. And that even if you do kill all the congress critters, that doesn’t replace the govt. >>> and they did have an actual goal, reversing a legal, & Constitutional >>> election, >> >> That doesn’t make it an insurrection, any more >> than a violent riot about Rowe v Wade would be. >> >>> because the election didn't go their way. >> >> Yes. >> >>> As for working a little bit better, that is what you get from a mob of >>> cult followers. >> >>>> If this was an insurrection, then so were the BLM riots -- although >>>> those rioters at least got new shoes and big TVs for their efforts. >> >>> Actually the BLM protests/riots were not in anyway close to being an >>> insurrection. They were not trying to overthrow a duly elected >>> government, >> >> Neither was the capitol violent riot. > > Yes. They were trying to overturn the election to put the loser in power. Storming the capitol couldn’t have achieved that. > That is textbook insurrection. Nope, because that couldn’t have replaced Biden with Trump. And he isnt the power anyway, Congress is. >>> they were protesting racially motivated injustice. >> >> Nope, there was no injustice involved. >> They were in fact protesting when black >> criminals ended up with what they deserved. > Really? Yep. > Did Breona Taylor get what she deserved? Yep, she was shacked up with a drug dealer. > What law had George Floyd broken when a police officer knelt on his neck He resisted getting into the cop car when caught passing a forged note. > for eight minutes until he died? That wouldn’t have happened if he had got into the cop car.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-18 16:16 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <28OdnQbAip4ylZv9nZ2dnUU7-WHNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #73763 |
On Jan 18, 2021 at 1:42:17 PM PST, ""Rod Speed"" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: > Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote >> Rod Speed wrote >>> Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> wrote >>>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote >>>>> Mayayana wrote >>>>>> Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote > >>>>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into the >>>>>> white >>>>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, that >>>>>> he was >>>>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>>>> | >>>>>> >>>>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>>>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >>>>>> just another dirty lie. >>>>> >>>>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted for >>>>> him because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he wasn't a >>>>> Democrat. >>>> >>>> It wasn't stupid people he pissed off. The stupid people seemed to be >>>> quite >>>> happy with him. >>>> >>>>> I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger military, a >>>>> pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already here, and the >>>>> elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama introduced. >>>> >>>> You got what you voted for, and the Obama shit he eliminated wasn't that >>>> stupid. >>>>> >>>>> Instead I got inane tweets. >>>> >>>> Now those were mostly, ...er, all stupid. >>>> >>>>> Still, he's not Hillary. >>>> >>>> No kidding. >>>>> >>>>>> Lindsey Graham is now blaming Pelosi for the Capitol >>>>>> mob, just days after denouncing Trump. Others are blaming >>>>>> BLM or Antifa. Meanwhile some don't deny it but say they >>>>>> attacked the building because Trump told them to. And Bev >>>>>> defends treason as an established right defined in the >>>>>> Constitution. >>>>> >>>>> It's only treason if you lose. This wasn't an insurrection, it was a >>>>> stupid mob doing stupid destructive shit for its own sake. An >>>>> insurrection would have had an actual goal and worked a little better. >>>> >>>> Actually it was an insurrection, >>> >>> Nope, just a violent riot. >> >> Where they came with zip-tie handcuffs... > > Only one individual did that, Actually there were two photographed and arrested with flex-cuffs. One the 30 year old wannabe warrior who was photographed with his mother. The other was the retired Airforce Lt. Colonel who was turned in by his ex-wife. -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-19 09:22 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6mg1gFjhntU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73769 |
Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> wrote > Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >> Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote >>> Rod Speed wrote >>>> Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> wrote >>>>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>> Mayayana wrote >>>>>>> Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >> >>>>>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into the >>>>>>> white >>>>>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, >>>>>>> that he was >>>>>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>>>>> | >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>>>>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >>>>>>> just another dirty lie. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted for >>>>>> him because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he wasn't >>>>>> a Democrat. >>>>> >>>>> It wasn't stupid people he pissed off. The stupid people seemed to be >>>>> quite >>>>> happy with him. >>>>> >>>>>> I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger military, a >>>>>> pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already here, and the >>>>>> elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama introduced. >>>>> >>>>> You got what you voted for, and the Obama shit he eliminated wasn't >>>>> that >>>>> stupid. >>>>>> >>>>>> Instead I got inane tweets. >>>>> >>>>> Now those were mostly, ...er, all stupid. >>>>> >>>>>> Still, he's not Hillary. >>>>> >>>>> No kidding. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Lindsey Graham is now blaming Pelosi for the Capitol >>>>>>> mob, just days after denouncing Trump. Others are blaming >>>>>>> BLM or Antifa. Meanwhile some don't deny it but say they >>>>>>> attacked the building because Trump told them to. And Bev >>>>>>> defends treason as an established right defined in the >>>>>>> Constitution. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's only treason if you lose. This wasn't an insurrection, it was >>>>>> a stupid mob doing stupid destructive shit for its own sake. An >>>>>> insurrection would have had an actual goal and worked a little >>>>>> better. >>>>> >>>>> Actually it was an insurrection, >>>> >>>> Nope, just a violent riot. >>> >>> Where they came with zip-tie handcuffs... >> >> Only one individual did that, > Actually there were two photographed and arrested with flex-cuffs. One the > 30 year old wannabe warrior who was photographed with his mother. The > other was the retired Airforce Lt. Colonel who was turned in by his > ex-wife. Still a microscopic subset of those there.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-18 14:23 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ru51pu$1gt$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73774 |
On 2021-01-18 2:22 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> wrote >> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>> Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote >>>> Rod Speed wrote >>>>> Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> wrote >>>>>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>> Mayayana wrote >>>>>>>> Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >>> >>>>>>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into >>>>>>>> the white >>>>>>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, >>>>>>>> that he was >>>>>>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>>>>>> | >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>>>>>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >>>>>>>> just another dirty lie. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted >>>>>>> for him because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because >>>>>>> he wasn't a Democrat. >>>>>> >>>>>> It wasn't stupid people he pissed off. The stupid people seemed >>>>>> to be quite >>>>>> happy with him. >>>>>> >>>>>>> I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger military, >>>>>>> a pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already here, >>>>>>> and the elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama introduced. >>>>>> >>>>>> You got what you voted for, and the Obama shit he eliminated >>>>>> wasn't that >>>>>> stupid. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Instead I got inane tweets. >>>>>> >>>>>> Now those were mostly, ...er, all stupid. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Still, he's not Hillary. >>>>>> >>>>>> No kidding. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lindsey Graham is now blaming Pelosi for the Capitol >>>>>>>> mob, just days after denouncing Trump. Others are blaming >>>>>>>> BLM or Antifa. Meanwhile some don't deny it but say they >>>>>>>> attacked the building because Trump told them to. And Bev >>>>>>>> defends treason as an established right defined in the >>>>>>>> Constitution. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's only treason if you lose. This wasn't an insurrection, it >>>>>>> was a stupid mob doing stupid destructive shit for its own sake. >>>>>>> An insurrection would have had an actual goal and worked a little >>>>>>> better. >>>>>> >>>>>> Actually it was an insurrection, >>>>> >>>>> Nope, just a violent riot. >>>> >>>> Where they came with zip-tie handcuffs... >>> >>> Only one individual did that, > >> Actually there were two photographed and arrested with flex-cuffs. One >> the 30 year old wannabe warrior who was photographed with his mother. >> The other was the retired Airforce Lt. Colonel who was turned in by >> his ex-wife. > > Still a microscopic subset of those there. > > How many does it take, sunshine?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-18 14:21 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ru51lj$1gt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73763 |
On 2021-01-18 1:42 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote >> Rod Speed wrote >>> Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> wrote >>>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote >>>>> Mayayana wrote >>>>>> Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote > >>>>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into the >>>>>> white >>>>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, >>>>>> that he was >>>>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>>>> | >>>>>> >>>>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>>>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >>>>>> just another dirty lie. >>>>> >>>>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted >>>>> for him because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he >>>>> wasn't a Democrat. >>>> >>>> It wasn't stupid people he pissed off. The stupid people seemed to >>>> be quite >>>> happy with him. >>>> >>>>> I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger military, a >>>>> pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already here, and >>>>> the elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama introduced. >>>> >>>> You got what you voted for, and the Obama shit he eliminated wasn't >>>> that >>>> stupid. >>>>> >>>>> Instead I got inane tweets. >>>> >>>> Now those were mostly, ...er, all stupid. >>>> >>>>> Still, he's not Hillary. >>>> >>>> No kidding. >>>>> >>>>>> Lindsey Graham is now blaming Pelosi for the Capitol >>>>>> mob, just days after denouncing Trump. Others are blaming >>>>>> BLM or Antifa. Meanwhile some don't deny it but say they >>>>>> attacked the building because Trump told them to. And Bev >>>>>> defends treason as an established right defined in the >>>>>> Constitution. >>>>> >>>>> It's only treason if you lose. This wasn't an insurrection, it was >>>>> a stupid mob doing stupid destructive shit for its own sake. An >>>>> insurrection would have had an actual goal and worked a little better. >>>> >>>> Actually it was an insurrection, >>> >>> Nope, just a violent riot. >> >> Where they came with zip-tie handcuffs... > > Only one individual did that, and even someone > as stupid as you should have noticed that they > arent the ideal way to kill all the Congress critters. Before I prove you wrong... AGAIN ...state clearly that you are going to stick with that claim. > > And that even if you do kill all the congress > critters, that doesn’t replace the govt. That there plan was a bad one, doesn't prevent it from being insurrection. > >>>> and they did have an actual goal, reversing a legal, & >>>> Constitutional election, >>> >>> That doesn’t make it an insurrection, any more >>> than a violent riot about Rowe v Wade would be. >>> >>>> because the election didn't go their way. >>> >>> Yes. >>> >>>> As for working a little bit better, that is what you get from a mob >>>> of cult followers. >>> >>>>> If this was an insurrection, then so were the BLM riots -- although >>>>> those rioters at least got new shoes and big TVs for their efforts. >>> >>>> Actually the BLM protests/riots were not in anyway close to being an >>>> insurrection. They were not trying to overthrow a duly elected >>>> government, >>> >>> Neither was the capitol violent riot. >> >> Yes. They were trying to overturn the election to put the loser in power. > > Storming the capitol couldn’t have achieved that. > >> That is textbook insurrection. > > Nope, because that couldn’t have replaced Biden with > Trump. And he isnt the power anyway, Congress is. Sorry, but your understanding of the law is woefully inadequate. Try and kill someone by shooting them in the chest, and it's still attempted murder even if you KNOW that he was wearing a bulletproof vest. > >>>> they were protesting racially motivated injustice. >>> >>> Nope, there was no injustice involved. >>> They were in fact protesting when black >>> criminals ended up with what they deserved. > >> Really? > > Yep. > >> Did Breona Taylor get what she deserved? > > Yep, she was shacked up with a drug dealer. Got any proof of that... ...or don't you have to provide proof. The police served their warrant on the wrong apartment, sunshine. > >> What law had George Floyd broken when a police officer knelt on his neck > > He resisted getting into the cop car > when caught passing a forged note. And for resisting getting into a cop car the sentence (no jury, no judge) is death? > >> for eight minutes until he died? > > That wouldn’t have happened if he had got into the cop car. How is that relevant? He was cuffed and the "officer" (now charged with murder, BTW) kept his knee on his neck for two minutes after he was non-responsive.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-19 10:01 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6mi9kFjuifU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73773 |
"Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message news:ru51lj$1gt$1@dont-email.me... > On 2021-01-18 1:42 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >> Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote >>> Rod Speed wrote >>>> Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> wrote >>>>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>> Mayayana wrote >>>>>>> Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >> >>>>>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into the >>>>>>> white >>>>>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, that >>>>>>> he was >>>>>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>>>>> | >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>>>>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >>>>>>> just another dirty lie. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted for >>>>>> him because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he wasn't >>>>>> a Democrat. >>>>> >>>>> It wasn't stupid people he pissed off. The stupid people seemed to be >>>>> quite >>>>> happy with him. >>>>> >>>>>> I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger military, a >>>>>> pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already here, and the >>>>>> elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama introduced. >>>>> >>>>> You got what you voted for, and the Obama shit he eliminated wasn't >>>>> that stupid. >>>>>> >>>>>> Instead I got inane tweets. >>>>> >>>>> Now those were mostly, ...er, all stupid. >>>>> >>>>>> Still, he's not Hillary. >>>>> >>>>> No kidding. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Lindsey Graham is now blaming Pelosi for the Capitol >>>>>>> mob, just days after denouncing Trump. Others are blaming >>>>>>> BLM or Antifa. Meanwhile some don't deny it but say they >>>>>>> attacked the building because Trump told them to. And Bev >>>>>>> defends treason as an established right defined in the >>>>>>> Constitution. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's only treason if you lose. This wasn't an insurrection, it was a >>>>>> stupid mob doing stupid destructive shit for its own sake. An >>>>>> insurrection would have had an actual goal and worked a little >>>>>> better. >>>>> >>>>> Actually it was an insurrection, >>>> >>>> Nope, just a violent riot. >>> >>> Where they came with zip-tie handcuffs... >> >> Only one individual did that, and even someone >> as stupid as you should have noticed that they >> arent the ideal way to kill all the Congress critters. > Before I prove you wrong... > AGAIN More of your bare faced lies. > ...state clearly that you are going to > stick with that claim. Go and fuck yourself. AGAIN. >> And that even if you do kill all the congress >> critters, that doesn’t replace the govt. > That there plan was a bad one, doesn't prevent it from being insurrection. But doing what couldn’t change who is in power means it wasn’t. >>>>> and they did have an actual goal, reversing a legal, & Constitutional >>>>> election, >>>> >>>> That doesn’t make it an insurrection, any more >>>> than a violent riot about Rowe v Wade would be. >>>> >>>>> because the election didn't go their way. >>>> >>>> Yes. >>>> >>>>> As for working a little bit better, that is what you get from a mob of >>>>> cult followers. >>>> >>>>>> If this was an insurrection, then so were the BLM riots -- although >>>>>> those rioters at least got new shoes and big TVs for their efforts. >>>> >>>>> Actually the BLM protests/riots were not in anyway close to being an >>>>> insurrection. They were not trying to overthrow a duly elected >>>>> government, >>>> >>>> Neither was the capitol violent riot. >>> >>> Yes. They were trying to overturn the election to put the loser in >>> power. >> >> Storming the capitol couldn’t have achieved that. >> >>> That is textbook insurrection. >> >> Nope, because that couldn’t have replaced Biden with >> Trump. And he isnt the power anyway, Congress is. > Sorry, but your understanding of the law is woefully inadequate. We'll see... > Try and kill someone by shooting them in the chest, and it's still > attempted murder even if you KNOW that he was wearing a bulletproof vest. Wrong, as always. >>>>> they were protesting racially motivated injustice. >>>> >>>> Nope, there was no injustice involved. >>>> They were in fact protesting when black >>>> criminals ended up with what they deserved. >> >>> Really? >> >> Yep. >> >>> Did Breona Taylor get what she deserved? >> >> Yep, she was shacked up with a drug dealer. > > Got any proof of that... Yep, his criminal record. > ...or don't you have to provide proof. We all swooned at the proof you provided that that cop had his head bashed in. > The police served their warrant on the wrong apartment, sunshine. Only because the criminal she was shacked up with was somewhere else at the time, shitshine. Pity about the other criminal who was actually stupid enough to shoot at the cops. >>> What law had George Floyd broken when a police officer knelt on his neck >> >> He resisted getting into the cop car >> when caught passing a forged note. > > And for resisting getting into a cop car the sentence (no jury, no judge) > is death? He wasn’t deliberately executed, you pathetic excuse for a lying bullshit artist. >>> for eight minutes until he died? >> >> That wouldn’t have happened if he had got into the cop car. > > How is that relevant? He was clearly a convicted criminal resisting arrest. > He was cuffed and the "officer" (now charged with murder, BTW) kept his > knee on his neck for two minutes after he was non-responsive. But didn’t deliberately execute him as you lied, as always.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-18 15:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ru55hi$qfh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73782 |
On 2021-01-18 3:01 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > > "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message > news:ru51lj$1gt$1@dont-email.me... >> On 2021-01-18 1:42 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>> Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote >>>> Rod Speed wrote >>>>> Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> wrote >>>>>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>> Mayayana wrote >>>>>>>> Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >>> >>>>>>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into >>>>>>>> the white >>>>>>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, >>>>>>>> that he was >>>>>>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>>>>>> | >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>>>>>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >>>>>>>> just another dirty lie. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted >>>>>>> for him because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because >>>>>>> he wasn't a Democrat. >>>>>> >>>>>> It wasn't stupid people he pissed off. The stupid people seemed to >>>>>> be quite >>>>>> happy with him. >>>>>> >>>>>>> I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger military, >>>>>>> a pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already here, >>>>>>> and the elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama introduced. >>>>>> >>>>>> You got what you voted for, and the Obama shit he eliminated >>>>>> wasn't that stupid. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Instead I got inane tweets. >>>>>> >>>>>> Now those were mostly, ...er, all stupid. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Still, he's not Hillary. >>>>>> >>>>>> No kidding. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lindsey Graham is now blaming Pelosi for the Capitol >>>>>>>> mob, just days after denouncing Trump. Others are blaming >>>>>>>> BLM or Antifa. Meanwhile some don't deny it but say they >>>>>>>> attacked the building because Trump told them to. And Bev >>>>>>>> defends treason as an established right defined in the >>>>>>>> Constitution. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's only treason if you lose. This wasn't an insurrection, it >>>>>>> was a stupid mob doing stupid destructive shit for its own sake. >>>>>>> An insurrection would have had an actual goal and worked a little >>>>>>> better. >>>>>> >>>>>> Actually it was an insurrection, >>>>> >>>>> Nope, just a violent riot. >>>> >>>> Where they came with zip-tie handcuffs... >>> >>> Only one individual did that, and even someone >>> as stupid as you should have noticed that they >>> arent the ideal way to kill all the Congress critters. > >> Before I prove you wrong... > >> AGAIN > > More of your bare faced lies. > >> ...state clearly that you are going to >> stick with that claim. > > Go and fuck yourself. > > AGAIN. So you are precisely the pussy I knew you were. > >>> And that even if you do kill all the congress >>> critters, that doesn’t replace the govt. > >> That there plan was a bad one, doesn't prevent it from being >> insurrection. > > But doing what couldn’t change who is in power means it wasn’t. > >>>>>> and they did have an actual goal, reversing a legal, & >>>>>> Constitutional election, >>>>> >>>>> That doesn’t make it an insurrection, any more >>>>> than a violent riot about Rowe v Wade would be. >>>>> >>>>>> because the election didn't go their way. >>>>> >>>>> Yes. >>>>> >>>>>> As for working a little bit better, that is what you get from a >>>>>> mob of cult followers. >>>>> >>>>>>> If this was an insurrection, then so were the BLM riots -- >>>>>>> although those rioters at least got new shoes and big TVs for >>>>>>> their efforts. >>>>> >>>>>> Actually the BLM protests/riots were not in anyway close to being >>>>>> an insurrection. They were not trying to overthrow a duly elected >>>>>> government, >>>>> >>>>> Neither was the capitol violent riot. >>>> >>>> Yes. They were trying to overturn the election to put the loser in >>>> power. >>> >>> Storming the capitol couldn’t have achieved that. >>> >>>> That is textbook insurrection. >>> >>> Nope, because that couldn’t have replaced Biden with >>> Trump. And he isnt the power anyway, Congress is. > >> Sorry, but your understanding of the law is woefully inadequate. > > We'll see... > >> Try and kill someone by shooting them in the chest, and it's still >> attempted murder even if you KNOW that he was wearing a bulletproof vest. > > Wrong, as always. Nope. Intent doesn't depend on whether or not your plan could possibly succeed. > >>>>>> they were protesting racially motivated injustice. >>>>> >>>>> Nope, there was no injustice involved. >>>>> They were in fact protesting when black >>>>> criminals ended up with what they deserved. >>> >>>> Really? >>> >>> Yep. >>> >>>> Did Breona Taylor get what she deserved? >>> >>> Yep, she was shacked up with a drug dealer. >> >> Got any proof of that... > > Yep, his criminal record. > >> ...or don't you have to provide proof. > > We all swooned at the proof you provided > that that cop had his head bashed in. Look! You're pussying out... ...again! > >> The police served their warrant on the wrong apartment, sunshine. > > Only because the criminal she was shacked up > with was somewhere else at the time, shitshine. Nope. She was at home with her boyfriend. > > Pity about the other criminal who was actually > stupid enough to shoot at the cops. Got any proof there was someone else who could have been home? Thought not... ...pussy. > >>>> What law had George Floyd broken when a police officer knelt on his >>>> neck >>> >>> He resisted getting into the cop car >>> when caught passing a forged note. >> >> And for resisting getting into a cop car the sentence (no jury, no >> judge) is death? > > He wasn’t deliberately executed, you > pathetic excuse for a lying bullshit artist. Really? So why did the cop keep his knee on his neck after he became unresponsive? > >>>> for eight minutes until he died? >>> >>> That wouldn’t have happened if he had got into the cop car. >> >> How is that relevant? > > He was clearly a convicted criminal resisting arrest. Nope. Since he was killed at the scene, there was not trial. > >> He was cuffed and the "officer" (now charged with murder, BTW) kept >> his knee on his neck for two minutes after he was non-responsive. > > But didn’t deliberately execute him as you lied, as always. You're the one who said he: "ended up with what [he] deserved." I just said he was murdered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-19 13:13 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6mthpFlttlU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73786 |
Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote > Rod Speed wrote >> Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote >>> Rod Speed wrote >>>> Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote >>>>> Rod Speed wrote >>>>>> Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> wrote >>>>>>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>> Mayayana wrote >>>>>>>>> Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote >>>> >>>>>>>>> | We have this thing called an "election". It got trump[ into the >>>>>>>>> white >>>>>>>>> | houe, and it got him out after he proved, without any doubt, >>>>>>>>> that he was >>>>>>>>> | not capable of handling the job. >>>>>>>>> | >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bev is a Trumpian. He'll wisecrack his way through, >>>>>>>>> no matter how grave the issue. For Trumpians, truth is >>>>>>>>> just another dirty lie. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm sorry to say that I was really disappointed in him. I voted >>>>>>>> for him because he pissed off stupid people, but mostly because he >>>>>>>> wasn't a Democrat. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It wasn't stupid people he pissed off. The stupid people seemed to >>>>>>> be quite >>>>>>> happy with him. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I expected lower taxes, a stronger border, a stronger military, a >>>>>>>> pathway to legality for the foreigners who were already here, and >>>>>>>> the elimination of a lot of stupid shit that Obama introduced. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You got what you voted for, and the Obama shit he eliminated wasn't >>>>>>> that stupid. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Instead I got inane tweets. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now those were mostly, ...er, all stupid. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Still, he's not Hillary. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No kidding. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Lindsey Graham is now blaming Pelosi for the Capitol >>>>>>>>> mob, just days after denouncing Trump. Others are blaming >>>>>>>>> BLM or Antifa. Meanwhile some don't deny it but say they >>>>>>>>> attacked the building because Trump told them to. And Bev >>>>>>>>> defends treason as an established right defined in the >>>>>>>>> Constitution. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's only treason if you lose. This wasn't an insurrection, it was >>>>>>>> a stupid mob doing stupid destructive shit for its own sake. An >>>>>>>> insurrection would have had an actual goal and worked a little >>>>>>>> better. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Actually it was an insurrection, >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope, just a violent riot. >>>>> >>>>> Where they came with zip-tie handcuffs... >>>> >>>> Only one individual did that, and even someone >>>> as stupid as you should have noticed that they >>>> arent the ideal way to kill all the Congress critters. >> >>> Before I prove you wrong... >> >>> AGAIN >> >> More of your bare faced lies. >> >>> ...state clearly that you are going to >>> stick with that claim. >> >> Go and fuck yourself. >> >> AGAIN. > > So you are precisely the pussy I knew you were. Any 3 year old could leave that for dead. Get one to help you before posting again, if anyone is actually stupid enough to let you anywhere near one. >>>> And that even if you do kill all the congress >>>> critters, that doesn’t replace the govt. >> >>> That there plan was a bad one, doesn't prevent it from being >>> insurrection. >> >> But doing what couldn’t change who is in power means it wasn’t. >> >>>>>>> and they did have an actual goal, reversing a legal, & >>>>>>> Constitutional election, >>>>>> >>>>>> That doesn’t make it an insurrection, any more >>>>>> than a violent riot about Rowe v Wade would be. >>>>>> >>>>>>> because the election didn't go their way. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes. >>>>>> >>>>>>> As for working a little bit better, that is what you get from a mob >>>>>>> of cult followers. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> If this was an insurrection, then so were the BLM riots -- >>>>>>>> although those rioters at least got new shoes and big TVs for their >>>>>>>> efforts. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Actually the BLM protests/riots were not in anyway close to being an >>>>>>> insurrection. They were not trying to overthrow a duly elected >>>>>>> government, >>>>>> >>>>>> Neither was the capitol violent riot. >>>>> >>>>> Yes. They were trying to overturn the election to put the loser in >>>>> power. >>>> >>>> Storming the capitol couldn’t have achieved that. >>>> >>>>> That is textbook insurrection. >>>> >>>> Nope, because that couldn’t have replaced Biden with >>>> Trump. And he isnt the power anyway, Congress is. >> >>> Sorry, but your understanding of the law is woefully inadequate. >> >> We'll see... >> >>> Try and kill someone by shooting them in the chest, and it's still >>> attempted murder even if you KNOW that he was wearing a bulletproof >>> vest. >> >> Wrong, as always. > Nope. Yep. > Intent doesn't depend on whether or not your plan could possibly succeed. Wrong, as always. If you know that they are wearing a bullet proof vest, you clearly don’t intend to kill them, fuckwit. >>>>>>> they were protesting racially motivated injustice. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope, there was no injustice involved. >>>>>> They were in fact protesting when black >>>>>> criminals ended up with what they deserved. >>>> >>>>> Really? >>>> >>>> Yep. >>>> >>>>> Did Breona Taylor get what she deserved? >>>> >>>> Yep, she was shacked up with a drug dealer. >>> >>> Got any proof of that... >> >> Yep, his criminal record. >> >>> ...or don't you have to provide proof. >> >> We all swooned at the proof you provided >> that that cop had his head bashed in. > Look! You're pussying out... ...again! More of your bare faced lies. That is rubbing your stupid nose in your mindless bullshit and lies. >>> The police served their warrant on the wrong apartment, sunshine. >> >> Only because the criminal she was shacked up >> with was somewhere else at the time, shitshine. > Nope. She was at home with her boyfriend. Yep, the one they were after was elsewhere. >> Pity about the other criminal who was actually >> stupid enough to shoot at the cops. > Got any proof there was someone else who could have been home? Yep, named in the warrant. <reams of your shit any 3 year old could leave for dead flushed where it belongs> >>>>> What law had George Floyd broken when a police officer knelt on his >>>>> neck >>>> >>>> He resisted getting into the cop car >>>> when caught passing a forged note. >>> >>> And for resisting getting into a cop car the sentence (no jury, no >>> judge) is death? >> >> He wasn’t deliberately executed, you >> pathetic excuse for a lying bullshit artist. > Really? Yep. > So why did the cop keep his knee on his neck after he became unresponsive? He was too stupid to realise that that could kill him. >>>>> for eight minutes until he died? >>>> >>>> That wouldn’t have happened if he had got into the cop car. >>> >>> How is that relevant? >> >> He was clearly a convicted criminal resisting arrest. > > Nope. Yep. > Since he was killed at the scene, there was not trial. He had been convicted and jailed for other crimes. >>> He was cuffed and the "officer" (now charged with murder, BTW) kept his >>> knee on his neck for two minutes after he was non-responsive. >> >> But didn’t deliberately execute him as you lied, as always. > > You're the one who said he: > > "ended up with what [he] deserved." I didn’t say he deserved to be killed, fuckwit. > I just said he was murdered. No evidence that he was murdered, just killed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-18 18:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ru5g29$l21$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73789 |
On 2021-01-18 6:13 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> Only one individual did that, and even someone >>>>> as stupid as you should have noticed that they >>>>> arent the ideal way to kill all the Congress critters. >>> >>>> Before I prove you wrong... >>> >>>> AGAIN >>> >>> More of your bare faced lies. >>> >>>> ...state clearly that you are going to >>>> stick with that claim. >>> >>> Go and fuck yourself. >>> >>> AGAIN. >> >> So you are precisely the pussy I knew you were. > > Any 3 year old could leave that for dead. Get one > to help you before posting again, if anyone is actually > stupid enough to let you anywhere near one. > You're becoming incoherent. I realize your claim that there was "only one individual" has already been shot to hell. >>>>> And that even if you do kill all the congress >>>>> critters, that doesn’t replace the govt. >>> >>>> That there plan was a bad one, doesn't prevent it from being >>>> insurrection. >>> >>> But doing what couldn’t change who is in power means it wasn’t. >>> >>>>>>>> and they did have an actual goal, reversing a legal, & >>>>>>>> Constitutional election, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That doesn’t make it an insurrection, any more >>>>>>> than a violent riot about Rowe v Wade would be. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> because the election didn't go their way. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As for working a little bit better, that is what you get from a >>>>>>>> mob of cult followers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If this was an insurrection, then so were the BLM riots -- >>>>>>>>> although those rioters at least got new shoes and big TVs for >>>>>>>>> their efforts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Actually the BLM protests/riots were not in anyway close to >>>>>>>> being an insurrection. They were not trying to overthrow a duly >>>>>>>> elected government, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Neither was the capitol violent riot. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes. They were trying to overturn the election to put the loser in >>>>>> power. >>>>> >>>>> Storming the capitol couldn’t have achieved that. >>>>> >>>>>> That is textbook insurrection. >>>>> >>>>> Nope, because that couldn’t have replaced Biden with >>>>> Trump. And he isnt the power anyway, Congress is. >>> >>>> Sorry, but your understanding of the law is woefully inadequate. >>> >>> We'll see... >>> >>>> Try and kill someone by shooting them in the chest, and it's still >>>> attempted murder even if you KNOW that he was wearing a bulletproof >>>> vest. >>> >>> Wrong, as always. > >> Nope. > > Yep. > >> Intent doesn't depend on whether or not your plan could possibly succeed. > > Wrong, as always. If you know that they > are wearing a bullet proof vest, you clearly > don’t intend to kill them, fuckwit. Sorry, but no. Intent doesn't depend on your chance of success. > >>>>>>>> they were protesting racially motivated injustice. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nope, there was no injustice involved. >>>>>>> They were in fact protesting when black >>>>>>> criminals ended up with what they deserved. >>>>> >>>>>> Really? >>>>> >>>>> Yep. >>>>> >>>>>> Did Breona Taylor get what she deserved? >>>>> >>>>> Yep, she was shacked up with a drug dealer. >>>> >>>> Got any proof of that... >>> >>> Yep, his criminal record. >>> >>>> ...or don't you have to provide proof. >>> >>> We all swooned at the proof you provided >>> that that cop had his head bashed in. > >> Look! You're pussying out... ...again! > > More of your bare faced lies. That is rubbing your > stupid nose in your mindless bullshit and lies. > >>>> The police served their warrant on the wrong apartment, sunshine. >>> >>> Only because the criminal she was shacked up >>> with was somewhere else at the time, shitshine. > >> Nope. She was at home with her boyfriend. > > Yep, the one they were after was elsewhere. > Name him or her. You won't. Because you can't. >>> Pity about the other criminal who was actually >>> stupid enough to shoot at the cops. > >> Got any proof there was someone else who could have been home? > > Yep, named in the warrant. And yet you won't name him or her. > > <reams of your shit any 3 year old could > leave for dead flushed where it belongs> LOL! > >>>>>> What law had George Floyd broken when a police officer knelt on >>>>>> his neck >>>>> >>>>> He resisted getting into the cop car >>>>> when caught passing a forged note. >>>> >>>> And for resisting getting into a cop car the sentence (no jury, no >>>> judge) is death? >>> >>> He wasn’t deliberately executed, you >>> pathetic excuse for a lying bullshit artist. > >> Really? > > Yep. > >> So why did the cop keep his knee on his neck after he became >> unresponsive? > > He was too stupid to realise that that could kill him. Really? A trained police officer couldn't figure out that kneeling on someone's neck... When it had already rendered them unresponsive. ...couldn't kill? > >>>>>> for eight minutes until he died? >>>>> >>>>> That wouldn’t have happened if he had got into the cop car. >>>> >>>> How is that relevant? >>> >>> He was clearly a convicted criminal resisting arrest. >> >> Nope. > > Yep. Nope. You can't be resisting arrest when you're unconscious... ...and he was already unconscious when he was killed. > >> Since he was killed at the scene, there was not trial. > > He had been convicted and jailed for other crimes. Which is utterly irrelevant. > >>>> He was cuffed and the "officer" (now charged with murder, BTW) kept >>>> his knee on his neck for two minutes after he was non-responsive. >>> >>> But didn’t deliberately execute him as you lied, as always. >> >> You're the one who said he: >> >> "ended up with what [he] deserved." > > I didn’t say he deserved to be killed, fuckwit. Really? So what DID you mean, pussy? > >> I just said he was murdered. > > No evidence that he was murdered, just killed. And yet, the "officer" has been charged with murder.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-19 13:46 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6mvg3Fm95tU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73791 |
Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote > Rod Speed wrote >>>>>> Only one individual did that, and even someone >>>>>> as stupid as you should have noticed that they >>>>>> arent the ideal way to kill all the Congress critters. >>>> >>>>> Before I prove you wrong... >>>> >>>>> AGAIN >>>> >>>> More of your bare faced lies. >>>> >>>>> ...state clearly that you are going to >>>>> stick with that claim. >>>> >>>> Go and fuck yourself. >>>> >>>> AGAIN. >>> >>> So you are precisely the pussy I knew you were. >> >> Any 3 year old could leave that for dead. Get one >> to help you before posting again, if anyone is actually >> stupid enough to let you anywhere near one. > You're becoming incoherent. You never could bullshit and lie your way out of a wet paper bag. And since this shit is the best you can manage, here goes the chain on the rest of your shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-18 18:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ru5hhd$v7u$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73793 |
On 2021-01-18 6:46 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote >> Rod Speed wrote > >>>>>>> Only one individual did that, and even someone >>>>>>> as stupid as you should have noticed that they >>>>>>> arent the ideal way to kill all the Congress critters. >>>>> >>>>>> Before I prove you wrong... >>>>> >>>>>> AGAIN >>>>> >>>>> More of your bare faced lies. >>>>> >>>>>> ...state clearly that you are going to >>>>>> stick with that claim. >>>>> >>>>> Go and fuck yourself. >>>>> >>>>> AGAIN. >>>> >>>> So you are precisely the pussy I knew you were. >>> >>> Any 3 year old could leave that for dead. Get one >>> to help you before posting again, if anyone is actually >>> stupid enough to let you anywhere near one. > >> You're becoming incoherent. > > You never could bullshit and lie your way out of a wet paper bag. And > since this shit is the best you can manage, here goes the chain on the > rest of your shit. > You're babbling.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-18 13:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ru4t75$69v$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73746 |
On 1/18/2021 12:14 PM, Savageduck wrote: <snip> > It wasn't stupid people he pissed off. The stupid people seemed to be quite > happy with him. Precisely. Unfortunately for him, a sufficient number of the stupid people that voted for him the first time, failed to do so a second time. Still, it's scary that he got 70+ million votes. That highlights the need for a massive education and deprogramming effort.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-19 08:30 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6md03FivfiU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73755 |
sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote > Savageduck wrote >> It wasn't stupid people he pissed off. The stupid people seemed to be >> quite happy with him. > Precisely. Unfortunately for him, a sufficient number of the stupid people > that voted for him the first time, failed to do so a second time. That’s not accurate. In fact he got more votes the second time than he did the first time, by millions too. > Still, it's scary that he got 70+ million votes. That highlights the need > for a massive education and deprogramming effort. That’s not the problem. The reason so many voted for him both times is that they are royally pissed off what the political system has delivered for them and want to see if he can do any better. And the vast bulk of those who vote for him are uneducable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web