Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #33030 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-02 19:37 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-08-08 05:49 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 127 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-02 19:37 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-02 15:43 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-02 19:54 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-02 22:28 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-03 03:18 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-03 03:43 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-02 23:51 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-03 04:21 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-03 06:34 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-08-02 23:43 -0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-03 07:06 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-03 06:47 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-08-03 11:04 +0200
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-03 19:13 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-03 15:19 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-08-04 08:57 +0200
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-04 10:54 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-08-04 13:05 +0200
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-04 03:54 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-04 10:54 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-04 04:00 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 21:03 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-08-03 10:57 +0200
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-03 19:32 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-03 15:33 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-03 19:42 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-03 16:00 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-08-04 09:15 +0200
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-04 10:54 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-08-04 13:06 +0200
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-08-03 11:07 +0200
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-03 06:38 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Meanie <meanie.brat@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 16:40 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-03 19:03 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-03 15:19 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-04 10:56 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-08-04 09:37 +0200
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-04 10:57 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-08-04 13:07 +0200
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-08-04 11:01 -0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-04 20:13 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-04 20:17 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-05 16:51 -0300
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-06 00:25 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-05 22:05 -0300
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-06 02:46 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-06 00:40 -0300
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-06 14:42 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-06 10:54 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-06 15:14 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-06 15:05 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-06 15:03 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-06 15:37 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-06 19:59 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-09 23:21 +0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-09 16:42 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-09 14:21 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-10 20:27 +0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? joe <none@domain.invalid> - 2016-08-10 08:37 -0500
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-10 08:37 -0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-10 08:37 -0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-10 17:43 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-14 02:41 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-14 00:07 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-14 22:23 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-14 19:00 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-14 22:24 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-14 18:59 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-14 22:24 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-14 18:59 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-14 22:24 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-14 23:35 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-16 00:10 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-15 23:51 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? AL <noemail@none.com> - 2016-08-15 22:11 -0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-16 06:42 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-16 19:25 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-16 19:58 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-17 01:21 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? AL <noemail@none.com> - 2016-08-16 23:11 -0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-17 16:12 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2016-08-19 19:12 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? AL <noemail@none.com> - 2016-08-19 14:57 -0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? "Jeff Gaines" <jgaines_newsid@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-08-20 07:53 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2016-08-20 12:56 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Roy Smith <rasmith1959@live.com> - 2016-08-17 03:12 -0500
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-17 10:16 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-17 17:11 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-17 17:11 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-17 16:22 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2016-08-19 18:43 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-09-09 02:11 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-09-09 02:20 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2016-08-16 14:06 -0500
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-16 19:30 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-14 17:56 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-14 14:09 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-14 18:18 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-14 22:23 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-14 23:32 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-15 02:06 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-14 22:23 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-14 23:33 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-15 02:06 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-14 22:23 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-14 22:29 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-14 23:37 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-15 02:06 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-15 05:17 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-15 01:47 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-16 00:17 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-16 01:41 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? crankypuss <undisclosedUserid@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 05:39 -0600
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-16 21:35 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? AL <noemail@none.com> - 2016-08-15 19:40 -0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? crankypuss <undisclosedUserid@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 05:49 -0600
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? AL <noemail@none.com> - 2016-08-16 08:46 -0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-16 00:11 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-16 01:11 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-16 21:35 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-16 22:01 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-10 20:47 +0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-07 01:44 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-07 03:57 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2016-08-07 19:48 +1000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-07 18:06 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-08 05:49 +0200
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-15 02:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nor82o$j0j$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #33363 |
On 14 Aug 2016 23:32:16 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: > Projection - you routinely lie and insult people in the Apple news > groups. No I don't. I just tell them the truth. To them, the truth is insulting. So be it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-14 22:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <noqr1q$4i6$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #33346 |
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 14:09:54 -0400, nospam wrote: > what he doesn't get is that an ad id is just one of many ways someone > can be tracked, so even if it really is removed, it doesn't actually do > what he hopes to do. This is one of the rare times you've said something half correct. I certainly know there are *plenty* of tracking on *all* computer devices, including on iOS. One by one, I try to understand them, where most that are on Android devices are also on iOS devices. For example, the Harris Stingray will track an iPhone as well as an Android phone, and browser fingerprinting works as well on Safari as it does on other browsers, and advertisement exploits and canvas exploits work on all devices, and mapping apps track you on all devices, etc. In fact, if you notice the subject line of this thread, it's all about *why* the iOS users seem to *feel* safer on iOS when they're actually no safer (and in some key ways, far less safe) than Android users are. It used to frustrate me how illogical iOS users are, but I finally figured out that whatever the Apple Marketing Mommy tells them is how they *feel*, and, to iOS users, that they *feel* safe, is all that matters. That they're no less safe in actuality doesn't matter to them. The only thing that matters to them is that Apple Marketing makes them *feel* safer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-14 23:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e1cddjFo020U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #33349 |
On 2016-08-14, Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote: > On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 14:09:54 -0400, nospam wrote: > >> what he doesn't get is that an ad id is just one of many ways someone >> can be tracked, so even if it really is removed, it doesn't actually do >> what he hopes to do. > > This is one of the rare times you've said something half correct. He's been saying this for many posts, and you have rejected or ignored it each time. So no, it's not rare at all. What is rare is that you are now acknowledging it. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-15 02:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nor82m$j0j$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #33364 |
On 14 Aug 2016 23:33:07 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: > He's been saying this for many posts, and you have rejected or ignored > it each time. Um... it's the subject line. So, um ... er.... it's only *you* who doesn't know this. HINT: Next time, read the subject line before responding.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-14 22:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <noqr1s$4i6$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #33345 |
On 14 Aug 2016 17:56:58 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: > All you have shown is that you can hide the ID from the > user interface. You haven't even bothered to verify that the ID isn't > still stored within the device, nor that the ID isn't being transmitted > over the network - you hid it and just gave up. I killed the app that *creates* the apid. And, I didn't install the account that manages the Apid. The ApID is gone.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-14 22:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <noqrbd$4rk$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #33350 |
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 22:23:57 +0000 (UTC), Aardvarks wrote: > I killed the app that *creates* the apid. > And, I didn't install the account that manages the Apid. > > The ApID is gone. AdID
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-14 23:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e1cdkuFo020U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #33350 |
On 2016-08-14, Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote: > On 14 Aug 2016 17:56:58 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: > >> All you have shown is that you can hide the ID from the >> user interface. You haven't even bothered to verify that the ID isn't >> still stored within the device, nor that the ID isn't being transmitted >> over the network - you hid it and just gave up. > > I killed the app that *creates* the apid. Nonsense. The advertising ID is created and stored by the Google Play Services API which is part of the Android operating system itself, which you have not removed. > The ApID is gone. You haven't offered a single shred of prof of that claim. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-15 02:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nor82k$j0j$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #33365 |
On 14 Aug 2016 23:37:03 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: > Nonsense. The advertising ID is created and stored by the Google Play > Services API which is part of the Android operating system itself, which > you have not removed. It's gone. I showed screenshots proving that. You missed it. It was in the first post. Heh heh ... you probably skipped it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-15 05:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e1d1ieFs6hvU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #33366 |
Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote: > On 14 Aug 2016 23:37:03 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: > >> Nonsense. The advertising ID is created and stored by the Google Play >> Services API which is part of the Android operating system itself, which >> you have not removed. > > It's gone. > > I showed screenshots proving that. Nope. All you have shown is that it is now hidden from the user interface. You haven't bothered to check if it is still stored on the device. You also haven't checked to see if it is being transmitted over the network. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-15 01:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <150820160147507333%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #33373 |
In article <e1d1ieFs6hvU1@mid.individual.net>, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > >> Nonsense. The advertising ID is created and stored by the Google Play > >> Services API which is part of the Android operating system itself, which > >> you have not removed. > > > > It's gone. > > > > I showed screenshots proving that. > > Nope. All you have shown is that it is now hidden from the user interface. > You haven't bothered to check if it is still stored on the device. You also > haven't checked to see if it is being transmitted over the network. or what else is sent
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-16 00:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <notm3g$1uiv$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #33374 |
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 01:47:50 -0400, nospam wrote: > or what else is sent The AdID is gone. But, you do have a point in that many other "things" can be sent, whether it's an iOS or an Android device. There's no difference between the two platforms since it's easy to turn off all the Google-Android-specific stuff (e.g., location services are trivial to turn off, as is the collection of SSIDs by Google). So the only thing that Google can get is stuff that's *also* on iOS, which is the whole point of this thread. For example, if someone is dumb enough to log into a Google account and then use their Google Maps on their mobile device, then it serves them right for being tracked (on either device). The fact you can use Google Maps *without* logging in is what people should be aware of (on both platforms). Same with youtube, whether you use it from a separate and special browser (as I do, under VPN) or from the youtube app. Google tracks all your youtubes, even if you're not logged in (where I would never log in on any platform). So, the risk is exactly the same for Google tracking between iOS and Android. Exactly. The only difference is that stupid Android users are more affected; but any Android user on this newsgroup should be smart enough to easily turn off *all* the Android-specific Google tracking, as I did. NOTE: Words are cheap and nospam is cheap so he will *say* that Google still tracks but they can't because *all* their tracking is turned off that is *specific* to Android. The tracking still exists that is on *both* Android and iOS so even though iOS users *feel* safer (because that's what Mommy Apple Marketing told them), they are just as safe as intelligent Android users are.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-16 01:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e1f99vFe72tU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #33389 |
On 2016-08-16, Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote: > On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 01:47:50 -0400, nospam wrote: > >> or what else is sent > > The AdID is gone. Unfortunately for you, repeating a phrase over and over doesn't magically make it true. Until you show a shred of proof, you are assumed to be wrong. : ) [mindless troll rant omitted] -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | crankypuss <undisclosedUserid@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-16 05:39 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nouus6$3mn$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #33391 |
On 08/15/2016 07:41 PM, Jolly Roger wrote: > On 2016-08-16, Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 01:47:50 -0400, nospam wrote: >> >>> or what else is sent >> >> The AdID is gone. > > Unfortunately for you, repeating a phrase over and over doesn't > magically make it true. Until you show a shred of proof, you are assumed > to be wrong. : ) > > [mindless troll rant omitted] > I wonder why we realize that here, but journalists and politicians and advertisers seem to have no inkling that repeating a phrase doesn't magically make it true... in fact some advertisers might have statistics to show that it does. Go figure, eh? -- http://totally-portable-software.blogspot.com [Sat Mar 26: "Documentation and Portability"]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-16 21:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <np00vn$153n$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #33391 |
On 16 Aug 2016 01:41:19 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: > Unfortunately for you, repeating a phrase over and over doesn't > magically make it true. Until you show a shred of proof, you are assumed > to be wrong. : I love when you post because you give me the most insight into the mind of the typical iOS user.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | AL <noemail@none.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-15 19:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <B2vsz.46235$n83.20918@fx43.iad> |
| In reply to | #33389 |
Aardvarks wrote: >if someone is dumb enough to log into a Google account and > then use their Google Maps on their mobile device, then it serves them > right for being tracked (on either device). Just curious. What's wrong with Google knowing where I am? Should I not also be paranoid of Verizon's cell service who also knows where I am? And GM (OnStar) who knows where my car and I are? And then there's Amex who follows me from place to place daily as I use my credit card. And Apple who knows where my wife is (Find my iPhone). > The fact you can use Google Maps *without* logging in is what people should > be aware of (on both platforms). So the only thing logging out of my Google account would accomplish for me is no more email... :-/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | crankypuss <undisclosedUserid@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-16 05:49 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nouus6$3mn$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #33392 |
On 08/15/2016 08:40 PM, AL wrote: > Aardvarks wrote: > >> if someone is dumb enough to log into a Google account and >> then use their Google Maps on their mobile device, then it serves them >> right for being tracked (on either device). > > Just curious. What's wrong with Google knowing where I am? > Should I not also be paranoid of Verizon's cell service who also knows > where I am? And GM (OnStar) who knows where my car and I are? And then > there's Amex who follows me from place to place daily as I use my credit > card. And Apple who knows where my wife is (Find my iPhone). > >> The fact you can use Google Maps *without* logging in is what people >> should >> be aware of (on both platforms). > > So the only thing logging out of my Google account would accomplish for > me is no more email... :-/ > There have been times when I thought "no more email" would be a very good thing indeed. <g> But I tend to agree. I have my Apple devices set to report their last-known-location in case I happen to want that information. I think anyone who is interested in following Mr Boring Nobody around by sniffing his electronic tracks deserves the accompanying descent into insanity of which such activity stands as evidence. -- http://totally-portable-software.blogspot.com [Sat Mar 26: "Documentation and Portability"]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | AL <noemail@none.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-16 08:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <yzGsz.25051$dk1.17992@fx41.iad> |
| In reply to | #33408 |
crankypuss wrote: > On 08/15/2016 08:40 PM, AL wrote: >> Just curious. What's wrong with Google knowing where I am? >> Should I not also be paranoid of Verizon's cell service >> who also knows >> where I am? And GM (OnStar) who knows where my car and I >> are? And then >> there's Amex who follows me from place to place daily as I >> use my credit >> card. And Apple who knows where my wife is (Find my iPhone). > I think anyone who is interested in following Mr Boring > Nobody around by sniffing his electronic tracks deserves the > accompanying descent into insanity of which such activity > stands as evidence. If anyone at Google picks me out of their 200+ million accounts to read I suppose I should feel honored. Perhaps that would be the day to play the lottery.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-16 00:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <notlnt$1u5m$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #33373 |
On 15 Aug 2016 05:17:02 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: > Nope. All you have shown is that it is now hidden from the user interface. > You haven't bothered to check if it is still stored on the device. You also > haven't checked to see if it is being transmitted over the network. You live in abject fear, so you just make this stuff up. When the apple mommy tells the child in bed that the big hairy blue monster can't get out of the closet when the lights are turned off if the closet door is closed ... you believe it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-16 01:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e1f7isFdtuiU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #33387 |
Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote: > On 15 Aug 2016 05:17:02 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: > >> Nope. All you have shown is that it is now hidden from the user interface. >> You haven't bothered to check if it is still stored on the device. You also >> haven't checked to see if it is being transmitted over the network. > > You live in abject fear, More insults showing you have nothing further of substance to add to the conversation. Troll on. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-16 21:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <np00vo$153n$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #33390 |
On 16 Aug 2016 01:11:57 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: > More insults showing you have nothing further of substance to add to the > conversation. Troll on. Again, you entirely missed the point. That's because I used metaphor. Since your mind works only in direct simple concepts, I'll explain the metaphor. Specifically: a) The "blue monster" is a metaphor for your made-up fears. b) The "mommy" is a metaphor for Apple Marketing. All your made-up fears are allayed by Apple Marketing in your child-like mind. Sheesh. I have to say things directly to you just for you to get the simplest of concepts. In a way, I love discussing technical concepts with you because you give me the most direct insight into the mind of the average iOS user.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web