Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #31681 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-14 23:20 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-07-16 20:31 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 181 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-14 23:20 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-14 19:22 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-15 01:50 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-14 21:51 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-15 02:00 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-14 22:09 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-15 01:55 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-14 23:23 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2016-07-14 18:59 -0500
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-15 01:51 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2016-07-14 21:20 -0500
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-07-15 14:19 +1200
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2016-07-14 21:31 -0500
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 01:29 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-15 18:43 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-15 16:36 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-15 18:43 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-07-18 14:33 +0200
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-18 18:20 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-18 18:21 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-18 20:37 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-18 22:57 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-18 23:06 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-19 00:08 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 01:29 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? PAS <abc@doremi.net> - 2016-07-15 10:03 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-15 10:38 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? PAS <abc@doremi.net> - 2016-07-15 11:17 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-15 12:41 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-15 17:07 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-15 19:32 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-15 19:12 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-15 15:16 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-15 19:36 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-15 18:58 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-15 18:52 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2016-07-15 11:26 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-15 19:31 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-15 18:43 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-15 15:16 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-15 19:37 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? ElfinArc6 <eflinarc6@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 14:40 -0500
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-15 20:04 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Meanie <meanie.brat@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 16:39 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-16 03:47 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-07-18 14:45 +0200
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-18 18:19 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-18 18:57 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-18 22:33 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-18 22:53 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-07-19 09:06 +0200
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-19 07:37 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-19 23:00 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-19 23:20 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-19 19:29 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 00:17 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-20 01:25 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 01:45 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-20 02:03 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 04:11 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-20 09:54 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-20 17:05 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-19 21:26 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 01:43 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 01:45 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-20 02:07 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 04:13 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-20 05:22 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-20 09:54 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-07-19 16:31 -0700
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-19 19:37 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 01:45 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-20 02:09 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 03:56 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-07-20 04:42 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-20 09:54 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-20 15:53 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-20 12:18 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-20 17:12 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-20 13:21 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 01:44 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-07-19 19:08 -0700
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 04:03 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-19 23:23 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 01:44 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-20 02:02 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 04:06 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-20 17:04 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 18:34 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 01:45 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-20 02:03 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 04:10 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-07-20 09:11 +0200
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 18:34 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-19 23:00 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-19 23:28 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 01:56 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-20 05:25 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-07-19 03:51 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-19 04:32 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2016-07-16 01:01 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-16 05:14 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? PAS <abc@doremi.net> - 2016-07-18 10:56 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-18 18:19 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-19 00:07 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-19 03:05 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-19 04:42 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-19 05:00 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-19 05:22 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-19 05:35 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-19 05:45 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-19 01:50 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-19 06:05 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-19 10:55 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-07-19 08:45 -0700
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-19 13:20 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 18:30 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-19 22:41 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 03:41 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 02:44 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 02:27 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-19 22:56 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 03:41 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-20 09:54 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 18:36 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-20 14:55 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-07-20 12:38 -0700
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-20 15:46 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-07-20 13:13 -0700
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 14:45 -0700
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-21 02:25 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-21 00:15 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 04:47 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-21 14:08 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-21 18:44 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-21 18:58 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-21 19:14 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-21 19:17 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-21 18:31 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 18:46 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-21 18:44 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-21 18:44 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-21 04:44 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? crankpuss <undisclosedUserid@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 05:03 -0600
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-21 14:11 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-21 18:44 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-21 18:31 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-21 18:44 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-21 18:51 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-21 19:17 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-21 19:19 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-21 21:43 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-21 18:30 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? crankpuss <undisclosedUserid@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 06:22 -0600
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-22 15:01 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-22 11:35 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-22 16:04 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? crankypuss <undisclosedUserid@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 13:23 -0600
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 03:41 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-19 23:00 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-19 06:18 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-20 03:41 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-07-20 05:17 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-15 18:43 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-15 01:55 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-14 21:56 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-15 02:04 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-14 22:09 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2016-07-15 01:32 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-15 19:32 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-15 15:37 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-07-15 13:17 -0700
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-16 03:58 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-07-15 10:42 +0200
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-15 19:34 +0000
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2016-07-16 01:08 -0400
Re: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-17 03:12 +0000
SOLVED: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? (was: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities?) Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-15 20:07 +0000
Re: SOLVED: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-16 04:29 +0000
Re: SOLVED: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-07-16 02:42 -0400
Re: SOLVED: Why do Apple Apologists lie so much about iOS capabilities? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-07-16 20:31 +0000
Page 4 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 10 Next page →
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-20 09:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <200720160954254097%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #32312 |
In article <nmmtm4$1hbq$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote: > You must feel threatened by my ideas; otherwise, why attack me personally? projection. *you* repeatedly attack anyone who doesn't agree with your bizarro ideas as well as anyone who uses apple products (note the thread title).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-20 17:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dv9pbiFiqicU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #32312 |
On 2016-07-20, Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote: > On 20 Jul 2016 02:03:57 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: > >> The only thing that is threatened by your nonsensical posts is your own >> credibility, fool. Keep trying! > > You must feel threatened by my ideas; otherwise, why attack me personally? You must feel threatened by Apple; you continually troll Apple news groups and insult Apple users. You reap what you sew. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 21:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <190720162126573400%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #32276 |
In article <nmmfuv$151p$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote: > You can't even comprehend that bluetooth file transfer has its place in > mobile devices. not anymore it doesn't. new technologies have replaced old outdated ones, something you just can't comprehend.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-20 01:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nmml0k$19c3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #32279 |
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 21:26:57 -0400, nospam wrote: >> You can't even comprehend that bluetooth file transfer has its place in >> mobile devices. > > not anymore it doesn't. > > new technologies have replaced old outdated ones, something you just > can't comprehend. See? I used to think you were stupid. But you're actually probably intelligent. At least, you *can* comprehend technology. That you can't comprehend that there are different ways of transferring files is what used to frustrate me. But now I understand. Apple Marketing didn't tell you to transfer files that way. Period. a. It threatens your herd solidarity b. It threatens your product cachet c. It is part of a multi-variable approach The fact that there is more than just the Apple way of doing something threatens one or more of those three insecurities. Mind you, I can easily tell this not from studying how you respond - because your responses are as predictable but far less simplistic than Jolly Roger's responses. But, once I understood Jolly Roger's fundamentalist motive - yours became as readily apparent.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-20 01:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nmml3p$19ed$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #32279 |
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 21:26:57 -0400, nospam wrote: >> You can't even comprehend that bluetooth file transfer has its place in >> mobile devices. > > not anymore it doesn't. > > new technologies have replaced old outdated ones, something you just > can't comprehend. See? I used to think you were stupid. But you're actually probably intelligent. At least, you *can* comprehend technology. That you can't comprehend that there are different ways of transferring files is what used to frustrate me. But now I understand. Apple Marketing didn't tell you to transfer files that way. Period. a. It threatens your herd solidarity b. It threatens your product cachet c. It is part of a multi-variable approach The fact that there is more than just the Apple way of doing something threatens one or more of those three insecurities. Mind you, I can easily tell this not from studying how you respond - because your responses are as predictable but far less simplistic than Jolly Roger's responses. But, once I understood Jolly Roger's fundamentalist motive - yours became as readily apparent.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-20 02:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dv84n3F6sc2U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #32287 |
On 2016-07-20, Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote: > > Apple Marketing didn't tell you to transfer files that way. > Period. Many of us were doing Bluetooth File Transfers before iOS ever came along. We just recognize there are now *much* better ways. You, on the other hand, can't seem to use anything but BT file transfers, because: troll. You're a transparent idiot troll. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-20 04:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nmmtoi$1hd8$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #32293 |
On 20 Jul 2016 02:07:32 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: > Many of us were doing Bluetooth File Transfers before iOS ever came > along. We just recognize there are now *much* better ways. You, on the > other hand, can't seem to use anything but BT file transfers, because: > troll. You're a transparent idiot troll. This time you actually make sense, in that bluetooth file transfer is a common concept. Why? Because it works across platforms without the need for a network. Can I do that on Android? You betcha. Can I do that on iOS? Nope. Why not?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-20 05:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dv8g4kF9aq9U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #32313 |
Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote: > On 20 Jul 2016 02:07:32 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: > >> Many of us were doing Bluetooth File Transfers before iOS ever came >> along. We just recognize there are now *much* better ways. You, on the >> other hand, can't seem to use anything but BT file transfers, because: >> troll. You're a transparent idiot troll. > > This time you actually make sense And you almost never do. > Can I do that on iOS? > Nope. > > Why not? I can do Bluetooth file transfers on iOS. You can't because: troll. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-20 09:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <200720160954264169%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #32313 |
In article <nmmtoi$1hd8$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote: > > > Many of us were doing Bluetooth File Transfers before iOS ever came > > along. We just recognize there are now *much* better ways. You, on the > > other hand, can't seem to use anything but BT file transfers, because: > > troll. You're a transparent idiot troll. > > This time you actually make sense, in that bluetooth file transfer is a > common concept. *was* > Why? > Because it works across platforms without the need for a network. what you fail to understand is that there are numerous new and more advanced methods to move content without the need for what you call a network (which shows how little you actually know about networking). fyi, just about any file transfer these days involves using a network, and that includes bluetooth (yes, it's a network, just a slow one). you're also too stupid to realize that android can use new methods too. it's not just apple that uses advanced technologies.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 16:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2016071916312583454-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #32270 |
On 2016-07-19 23:20:51 +0000, Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> said: > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 23:00:12 +0000 (UTC), Aardvarks wrote: > >> I love when *you* post, because you are far more simple minded than is >> nospam or Michael Eyd, so, I can more easily understand the mindset of the >> average iOS user though your simplistic thought processes. > > Here's what I've learned, simply by trying to understand how you think, > mainly because you're one of the easiest to figure out. > > You exhibit in all your posts: > a. A herd mentality xenophobia > b. Cachet-inspired insecurities > c. An inability to comprehend multi-vector solution > > For example, you can't fathom, nor even imagine in your wildest dreams, > that more than one thing contributes to desktop organization. > > It's the one-button-mouse mentality, in a nutshell. When you are ignorant on a subject it really shows. The "one-button-mouse" has not been part of the Apple World for years. Yet you continue to believe that bringing out that ancient blob of FUD is somehow going to add weight to your anti-Apple campaign, and from the dark depths of your mind, another insult to users of Apple products. -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 19:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <190720161937510680%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #32274 |
In article <2016071916312583454-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> >
> > It's the one-button-mouse mentality, in a nutshell.
>
> When you are ignorant on a subject it really shows. The
> "one-button-mouse" has not been part of the Apple World for years.
about 30 years, actually.
macs have supported multi-button mice since around 1986, several of
which were available from third parties.
windows 2.0 had not yet been released, which almost nobody used anyway.
> Yet
> you continue to believe that bringing out that ancient blob of FUD is
> somehow going to add weight to your anti-Apple campaign, and from the
> dark depths of your mind, another insult to users of Apple products.
yep.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-20 01:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nmml3m$19ed$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #32275 |
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 19:37:51 -0400, nospam wrote: > about 30 years, actually. > > macs have supported multi-button mice since around 1986, several of > which were available from third parties. > > windows 2.0 had not yet been released, which almost nobody used anyway. I will simply repeat what I said, since *most* of you exhibit the same fundamentalist ideals (e.g., Jolly Roger, nospam, SavageDuck and the Jamie's). NOTE: Michelle, Patty Winters, David Empson, and Sobriquet are *not* the type of Apple Fundamentalists that I describe below. ========================== The one-button mouse existed - but that's not the point in the least because it was merely a well-known example to exemplify a concept. That you base your entire argument on that well-known exemplification is what used to frustrate me to no end in the past. It used to bother me that you base your entire argument by attacking a mere off-the-cuff illustrative example - and - in doing so, you completely miss the concept. What I've learned, mostly from Michael Eyd and Jolly Roger, is that when you so directly attack a mere well-known off-the-cuff example, you show that you either purposefully or unconsciously are threatened by the main concept. I'm not sure what part of that well-known example threatened you so much, but so far, all the threats have been from your perception of you: a. Herd mentality b. Marketing cachet c. Single-vector approach Which of those three fundamentalist ideals do you feel were threatened by that single-mouse-button example?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-20 02:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dv84q5F6sc2U5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #32284 |
On 2016-07-20, Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 19:37:51 -0400, nospam wrote: > >> about 30 years, actually. >> >> macs have supported multi-button mice since around 1986, several of >> which were available from third parties. >> >> windows 2.0 had not yet been released, which almost nobody used anyway. > > I will simply repeat what I said, blah blah blah blah blah He actually thinks this is working. : D -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-20 03:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nmmspf$1g6u$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #32295 |
On 20 Jul 2016 02:09:09 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: > He actually thinks this is working. : D What I love is that you are my favorite poster to this thread because I see, in all your posts, the pattern that explains not only you, but most of the others.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-20 04:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ck1m3owl1jko.15oqw5fpflzjl$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #32275 |
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 19:37:51 -0400, nospam wrote: > windows 2.0 had not yet been released, which almost nobody used anyway. LOL! Natch. Who'd try to use an OS that "had not yet been released" :-) ? Do try to think before you write. Cheers, -- tlvp -- Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-20 09:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <200720160954243991%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #32340 |
In article <ck1m3owl1jko.15oqw5fpflzjl$.dlg@40tude.net>, tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> wrote: > > > windows 2.0 had not yet been released, which almost nobody used anyway. > > LOL! Natch. Who'd try to use an OS that "had not yet been released" :-) ? whoosh. > Do try to think before you write. Cheers, -- tlvp do try to read for comprehension and don't snip to alter context either.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-20 15:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dv9l4mFi4naU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #32340 |
tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 19:37:51 -0400, nospam wrote: > >> windows 2.0 had not yet been released, which almost nobody used anyway. > > LOL! Natch. Who'd try to use an OS that "had not yet been released" :-) ? > Do try to think before you write. *WHOOSH* The point is that at the time Macs supported multi-button mice (starting around 1986), Windows 2 hadn't even been released. Have you used a multi-button mouse with Windows 1? I'd be interested to know what you could do with it. I doubt it would be very useful. : ) -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-20 12:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <200720161218302732%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #32385 |
In article <dv9l4mFi4naU1@mid.individual.net>, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > >> windows 2.0 had not yet been released, which almost nobody used anyway. > > > > LOL! Natch. Who'd try to use an OS that "had not yet been released" :-) ? > > Do try to think before you write. > > *WHOOSH* > > The point is that at the time Macs supported multi-button mice (starting > around 1986), Windows 2 hadn't even been released. and that windows 2 didn't sell very well after it was released. it wasn't until windows 3 when windows started to become popular, with windows 95 where it took off. > Have you used a multi-button mouse with Windows 1? I'd be interested to > know what you could do with it. I doubt it would be very useful. : ) windows 1 did support a 2-button mouse, but that doesn't mean it was useful. it was pretty bad. there weren't even overlapping windows. they were all tiled, and back then, displays were 640x480, so not much space for tiling. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Windows1.0.png>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-20 17:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dv9pnbFiqicU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #32391 |
On 2016-07-20, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <dv9l4mFi4naU1@mid.individual.net>, Jolly Roger ><jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > >>>> windows 2.0 had not yet been released, which almost nobody used anyway. >>> >>> LOL! Natch. Who'd try to use an OS that "had not yet been released" :-) ? >>> Do try to think before you write. >> >> *WHOOSH* >> >> The point is that at the time Macs supported multi-button mice (starting >> around 1986), Windows 2 hadn't even been released. > > and that windows 2 didn't sell very well after it was released. > > it wasn't until windows 3 when windows started to become popular, with > windows 95 where it took off. Yes, I remember it well. At the time a lot of my PC-using friends were still stuck in DOS-land, and many of them made jokes about my Mac with cute little pictures and icons on the screen being a kid's toy. It was funny to watch each of them turn right around and embrace Windows not long after that. : ) >> Have you used a multi-button mouse with Windows 1? I'd be interested to >> know what you could do with it. I doubt it would be very useful. : ) > > windows 1 did support a 2-button mouse, but that doesn't mean it was > useful. it was pretty bad. there weren't even overlapping windows. they > were all tiled, and back then, displays were 640x480, so not much space > for tiling. > ><https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Windows1.0.png> Right. I was more interested in what multi-button functionality was (or wasn't) there. I doubt there was a whole lot you could do with that second button. : ) -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-20 13:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <200720161321540959%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #32405 |
In article <dv9pnbFiqicU6@mid.individual.net>, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > > it wasn't until windows 3 when windows started to become popular, with > > windows 95 where it took off. > > Yes, I remember it well. At the time a lot of my PC-using friends were > still stuck in DOS-land, and many of them made jokes about my Mac with > cute little pictures and icons on the screen being a kid's toy. It was > funny to watch each of them turn right around and embrace Windows not > long after that. : ) yep. the same thing is happening now, where people call phones and tablets toys. the number of tasks that require a desktop or a laptop is shrinking, and rather rapidly. mobile is clearly the future.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web