Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #21118 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-22 10:06 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-07-23 08:39 +1000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 353 — 49 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-22 10:06 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 10:23 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 08:56 +1000
anonymous sims in EU (was: Who pays for a phone..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-07-23 20:21 +0200
Re: anonymous sims in EU tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-03 20:04 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 03:22 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 10:27 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-22 17:00 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 13:26 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 10:00 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 14:22 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-07-22 10:07 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-22 20:06 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? DevilsPGD <boogabooga@crazyhat.net> - 2015-07-22 13:13 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 09:08 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Chris Blunt <mail@nospam.com> - 2015-07-24 11:22 +0800
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 14:36 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:12 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-25 19:34 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 16:58 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 17:51 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 09:57 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-24 14:32 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Wolfgang Barth <barthwo@spamfence.net> - 2015-07-24 15:38 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-07-24 09:26 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:22 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-07-25 11:19 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:17 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-07-25 11:18 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-25 19:47 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-27 09:46 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 03:50 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 06:59 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-04 16:21 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 08:52 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 05:30 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-04 19:33 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-06 09:39 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 12:17 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 05:41 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-04 17:25 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 05:26 +1000
voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-05 20:08 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-05 14:58 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-05 15:16 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 12:41 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-05 16:03 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 06:24 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 13:34 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 04:51 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-10-21 19:45 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 09:17 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-10-24 17:49 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 13:40 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "NotMe" <me@privacy.net> - 2015-10-24 19:03 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-25 09:52 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 22:28 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Walter Briscoe <wbriscoe@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2015-10-25 08:17 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 10:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-10-25 18:50 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-25 18:00 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 10:16 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-26 07:24 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 10:13 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-27 07:09 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 20:03 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-27 18:33 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "NotMe" <me@privacy.net> - 2015-10-26 08:07 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-10-25 14:58 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "NotMe" <me@privacy.net> - 2015-10-25 17:10 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-10-26 10:08 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 10:09 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-26 07:27 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 10:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-27 07:11 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 20:09 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Walter Briscoe <wbriscoe@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2015-10-26 21:24 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 23:18 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 13:22 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 13:41 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 14:53 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-06 15:35 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 23:26 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-06 16:35 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 09:46 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 14:40 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-07 06:02 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-08 01:09 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 14:04 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas DevilsPGD <boogabooga@crazyhat.net> - 2015-08-09 00:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-08-09 12:42 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2015-08-10 00:18 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-08-09 17:50 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-09 23:19 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-09 23:10 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 08:43 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 13:40 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-11 00:21 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 06:57 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-11 09:57 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:20 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-12 11:21 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-12 19:50 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-12 16:21 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-13 12:08 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-13 09:58 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-13 17:04 +0200
security concept "rule of least priviledge" (was: voting booths in repu areas) Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-17 16:42 -0400
Re: security concept "rule of least priviledge" (was: voting booths in repu areas) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-18 10:08 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 06:26 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-13 09:38 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-13 17:14 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-13 11:42 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-13 18:47 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-13 14:22 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 07:00 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-14 11:34 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 06:53 +0700
what's entrapment (was: voting booths in republican areas) Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-15 14:13 +0000
Re: what's entrapment (was: voting booths in republican areas) John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:20 +0700
Re: what's entrapment Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-18 22:06 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 06:43 +0700
prosecutors do not care about guilt (was: voting booths in republican areas) Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-15 13:42 +0000
Re: prosecutors do not care about guilt (was: voting booths in republican areas) John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:08 +0700
Re: prosecutors do not care about guilt (was: voting booths in republican areas) Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-16 17:14 +0200
Re: prosecutors do not care about guilt Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-17 22:57 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-12 13:07 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-08-12 18:31 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-12 22:44 -0400
why disclose personal info (was: voting booths in republican areas) Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-15 13:20 +0000
Re: why disclose personal info David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-08-15 15:12 +0100
Re: why disclose personal info Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-08-15 15:08 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:26 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:23 -0700
accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-15 09:50 -0400
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) lew <citrustwosac@google.mailer.company.invalid> - 2015-08-15 16:36 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 10:55 -0700
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-15 14:44 -0500
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 19:34 -0700
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:54 +0700
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-18 11:02 +1000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-22 12:55 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-22 19:08 +0200
security vs. manners (was: accommodating unreasonable searches..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-24 00:48 +0200
Re: security vs. manners Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-24 14:18 -0400
Re: security vs. manners The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:59 -0700
Re: security vs. manners Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-25 13:40 +0200
Re: security vs. manners Travis Bickle <3S96@taxi.net> - 2015-08-25 12:31 -0400
Re: security vs. manners lew <citrustwosac@google.mailer.company.invalid> - 2015-08-25 16:38 +0000
Re: security vs. manners "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-26 09:29 -0400
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 10:19 -0400
Re: security vs. manners "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-26 11:45 -0400
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 13:53 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-26 14:39 -0500
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 16:56 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-26 16:08 -0500
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:33 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-26 17:32 -0500
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 19:51 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-26 18:59 -0500
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-27 08:42 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-27 09:24 -0500
Re: security vs. manners tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-26 22:52 -0400
Re: security vs. manners The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 09:57 -0700
Re: security vs. manners Bob Henson <rh547477@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 15:36 +0100
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-25 21:04 -0400
Re: security vs. manners tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-26 03:25 -0400
Re: security vs. manners "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-26 09:26 -0400
Re: security vs. manners The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 12:18 -0700
Re: security vs. manners (was: accommodating unreasonable searches..) TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-25 08:36 -0400
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2015-08-16 23:19 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) "Stuart McCall" <smccall@myunrealbox.com> - 2015-08-17 18:08 +0100
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-17 17:22 -0400
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2015-08-17 23:15 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) "Stuart McCall" <smccall@myunrealbox.com> - 2015-08-18 17:11 +0100
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2015-08-18 23:03 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) Joe Makowiec <makowiec@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-19 13:53 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 06:49 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-06 17:25 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 19:51 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 19:31 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 21:56 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-06 20:51 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-06 21:48 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 19:29 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-07 15:40 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-07 00:08 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-07 21:08 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-08 01:04 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 13:58 +1000
do absentee voters need photo id? (was: voting booths in republican areas) Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-08 14:03 +0200
Re: do absentee voters need photo id? (was: voting booths in republican areas) Elias <elias@nowherenohow.com> - 2015-08-08 10:02 -0500
Re: do absentee voters need photo id? (was: voting booths in republican areas) Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-08 21:28 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-06 15:23 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas News <News@Group.Post> - 2015-08-06 07:00 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 04:59 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:33 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-06 15:34 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 18:50 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 16:55 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 09:12 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 08:40 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-06 07:26 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 12:16 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 13:24 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 12:16 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 13:22 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-06 07:35 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-08-06 14:36 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 12:18 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 13:31 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:46 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 14:04 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 12:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 14:27 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:44 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 13:58 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 12:12 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:36 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-10 20:05 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 06:18 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-05 15:27 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 13:38 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 15:25 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-05 15:19 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 09:07 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 08:38 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-06 07:25 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 11:11 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-06 07:31 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 12:02 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 11:14 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:38 -0700
leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-07 14:58 +0200
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-07 10:56 -0400
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 05:16 +1000
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-25 22:45 +0200
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-26 09:24 -0400
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-27 13:47 +0000
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-27 10:20 -0400
q) campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? a) education Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-09-03 08:44 +0000
comp.mobile.android "The Sorceress of Qar" <sorceress@qar.qanar.com> - 2015-08-27 09:23 -0500
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-27 13:01 -0400
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201509.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-09-06 00:12 +0200
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-08 16:21 -0700
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-22 23:11 +0200
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 20:54 -0700
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-08-22 23:40 -0500
Bev's reverse logic (was: leader's campaigns..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-09-03 09:22 +0200
Re: Bev's reverse logic David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-09-03 08:44 +0100
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-23 08:49 -0400
small campaign donations (was: leader's campaigns..) Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-31 16:06 -0400
leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-12 04:08 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> - 2015-08-05 18:13 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 16:02 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Mike Yetto <unet.lighthouse@xoxy.net> - 2015-08-06 18:27 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> - 2015-08-07 12:36 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-07 12:38 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-10 08:51 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-10 22:28 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-11 08:53 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-11 01:06 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-11 10:25 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-11 17:46 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-12 09:54 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-05 19:00 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> - 2015-08-07 12:39 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-08-06 16:14 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 09:07 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-18 09:49 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 11:46 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-18 12:38 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 18:51 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-19 11:14 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 08:31 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-19 12:56 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 11:57 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-19 15:04 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 12:22 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-19 15:36 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 06:09 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 13:10 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:03 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 12:39 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Joe Makowiec <makowiec@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-19 20:09 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 14:27 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 14:58 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 16:10 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-20 08:32 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:14 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-24 08:33 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-24 09:37 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 15:27 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:13 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-19 16:34 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 14:46 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-20 12:40 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-20 09:55 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-20 10:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-20 22:35 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:09 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:02 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-19 00:03 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 19:01 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2015-08-19 19:08 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 09:34 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-18 23:57 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 19:05 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 09:28 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2015-08-19 19:14 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-19 09:09 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 07:15 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 05:56 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 05:52 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 13:15 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas David Solimano <david@solimano.org> - 2015-08-06 22:52 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 21:59 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 20:26 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 14:03 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:11 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 05:34 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-25 20:04 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Dieghettino <d@casa.mia> - 2015-07-26 06:41 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 08:45 +1000
non-EU travellers must carry passports (was: Who pays..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-01 20:26 +0200
Re: non-EU travellers must carry passports cl@isbd.net - 2015-08-01 21:33 +0100
Re: non-EU travellers must carry passports tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-03 23:11 -0400
Re: non-EU travellers must carry passports cl@isbd.net - 2015-08-04 14:25 +0100
Re: non-EU travellers must carry passports Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-05 18:56 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 04:05 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 07:03 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 14:11 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-04 11:19 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 12:19 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 12:32 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-04 15:40 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 14:15 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 05:36 +1000
id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-05 20:05 +0000
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 13:19 -0700
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 04:46 -0400
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 09:10 -0400
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 14:51 -0400
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 14:58 -0400
id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-08 08:48 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-26 18:45 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 10:04 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-27 09:51 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-28 09:30 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 20:24 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-25 19:57 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 16:57 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 08:39 +1000
Page 2 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 18 Next page →
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 17:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mp1as7$u6c$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21301 |
On 07/25/2015 01:58 PM, M.L. wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 19:34:53 +0000, Frank Slootweg wrote: > >> Well, except for a few know-it-alls in this group, most of us have >> rather limited mind-reading capabilities and our crystal balls are >> worthless as well, but the most *likely* explanation is that just wanted >> to make sure that you would pay the bill. As I said before, what they >> did is probably *illegal* in Italy, but heh, they're Italians, so what >> the heck has the law got to do with anything!? I had heard that the passport-retention thing was required by the police (I assume) in case the guests committed a crime. > I think the only rule that matters in Italy is that, whatever you do > while driving, you have to mean it. > > They sense fear. When we were in Rome we enjoyed watching two drivers jumping up and down on their cars in order to separate locked bumpers. They seemed to enjoy the process too. This was in 1978; I doubt if modern bumpers could stand treatment like that. We now protect our bumpers with our cars instead of the other way around. -- Cheers, Bev =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= SAVE GAS, FART IN A JAR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-26 09:57 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <d1imevFu3rbU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #21292 |
"Dieghettino" <d@casa.mia> wrote in message news:slrnmr84tj.c8r.d@news.eternal-september.org... >> M.L. <me@privacy.invalid> wrote: >>> On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:36:48 +1000, Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> > They only do that for foreigners, not even those from other EU >>> > countrys. >>> >>> I don't know the answer, but I *think* they give the passports to the >>> local *police*, whom you apparently have to *register* with. >>> >>> Again, this is all foreign to me, so, those who actually know *why* they >>> physically held the passports the entire week, should let me know too. >> >> Well, except for a few know-it-alls in this group, most of us have >> rather limited mind-reading capabilities and our crystal balls are >> worthless as well, but the most *likely* explanation is that just wanted >> to make sure that you would pay the bill. As I said before, what they >> did is probably *illegal* in Italy, but heh, they're Italians, so what >> the heck has the law got to do with anything!? > > Many things have been said on this topic, most of them wrong. > I will try to shred some light (or to confuse them definitively...) > > Here in Italy we have many personal identification documents which, with > regards to being identified with, are equivalent. Mains are: > > - passport (as everybody) > - "Carta d'identità" (namely: identity card. Many other european > countries have a similar one and are accepted in Italy) > - Driving license (yes, it is accepted as ID. I mean: the italian one) > - Gun licence (yes, we are so strange that, to buy a gun, we need to > obtain a license which is issued by an authority and is an ID. If you > can't understand why we are so strange, don't bother: that's > reciprocal...) > > There are a few others, but they are not so widespread. Well, gun licence > is not common at all either... > Many have a driving licence so, has long as > you do not need to go abroad, you can live happily (and legally) on your > driving license. If you happen to go abroad, then if you stay inside UE > the > identity card is good enough and it is MUCH cheaper than the passport, > so you never apply for a passport until you don't plan to go outside UE. > Many people live all their life (happily) without ever holding a passport. > > In any case, the identity card in Italy is considered the main ID. > I think that nearly everybody has the "carta d'identità". > > As for being registered at hotels. > Believe it or not, they don't do it because they fear you don't pay: if > you happen not to pay, they have to sue you and the expenses and the > hassle is MUCH bigger of the value you owe them. If they don't trust you, > they ask you to pay in advance or they swipe your credit card (as > everywhere else in the world, anyway). > Registration at hotels happens > simply because there is a law which forces them to do it. This law > goes back to 1931 and, if you are good at history, you should realize that > at the time the italian prime minister was.... guess who? > Yes: Benito Mussolini. This, I think, should be enough to explain the > origin and the meaning of the law. > Well, time is gone since then... but... when they get you used to it... > why to change...? ;) > So, we still have that law which simply says that everybody which sleeps > in > an hotel must be registered and communicated to the police enforcement. > Believe me: it is a great hassle for hotel keepers and they would really > get rid of it but, clearly, it is not in their power. > Moreover: in principle, the law also forces them to register clients > _in the very moment_ they register in, so they should give you back your > ID > (whatever it is) together with the key. But since it is such an hassle, > they usually postpone this boring and time-consuming duty to downtimes: > this is why they ask you to leave your ID. > But if you urge them that you need your ID for wathever reason, usually > they do it straight away or, at least, take a copy of your ID. > That's all of the story. > > As for italian sims. > I am not an expert, anyway in Italy we have mostly prepaid sims. The > reason is simple: on contracts there is a tax which makes sense only if it > is not a private sim. > Main operators are: TIM, Vodafone, Wind, 3. > There are also virtual operators. > You subscribe for a basic fare (something like 0.15 €/min for voice calls) > but you hardly ever use it: usually you put a monthly option on top of it. > Something like 9 €/month for 200 minutes, 200 sms, 1 GB (it is only an > example, but this is the order of magnitude). > > This means that during the month, you can make for free (well... free > but for the 9€ you already gave them...) 200 minutes of outgoing calls to > ITALIAN numbers, send for free (as before...) 200 sms to ITALIAN numbers > and use 1GB of free (...) data. All this holds only as long as you use > your > phone from within Italy, otherwise you start roaming as your option does > not apply while you are abroad. If you happen to run out of, say, minutes > then you call using your basic fare till your option is renewed at the end > of the period. > And yes: we belong to that small minority of people in the world > who don't get charged for incoming calls, wherever they originate in this > strange planet. Vast majority in fact.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-24 14:32 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <motb7v$m7i$2@news.sap-ag.de> |
| In reply to | #21252 |
Am 24.07.2015 um 05:22 schrieb Chris Blunt: > On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:27:54 -0400, "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> wrote: > >> On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:06:17 +0200, Michael Eyd wrote: >> >>> Hotels depend in their handling (AFAIK) from country to country, in >>> Germany e.g. I think I never needed an identity card for many years. >> >> I remember, in Italy, they *took* my passport from me! >> I was shocked. It was their *rule*. > > So how can people who don't hold passports ever stay at hotels in > Italy? Bear in mind that in Europe (other than in the US) most countries have an identity card, which serves as the primary identification method there. And for travels inside Europe a European hardly ever needs a passport, the identity card is sufficient for travelling to most countries. Best regards, Michael
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wolfgang Barth <barthwo@spamfence.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-24 15:38 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <d1etecFvmjU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #21260 |
Am 24.07.2015 um 14:32 schrieb Michael Eyd: >>> >>>> Hotels depend in their handling (AFAIK) from country to country, in >>>> Germany e.g. I think I never needed an identity card for many years. >>> >>> I remember, in Italy, they *took* my passport from me! >>> I was shocked. It was their *rule*. >> >> So how can people who don't hold passports ever stay at hotels in >> Italy? > > Bear in mind that in Europe (other than in the US) most countries have > an identity card, which serves as the primary identification method > there. And for travels inside Europe a European hardly ever needs a > passport, the identity card is sufficient for travelling to most countries. > Yes, thats correct. Most people dont have a passport because its only needed for travel in non-european countries. I think the drivers licence is used for ID in the US in most cases. I heard there is a "non-drivers-licence" card for people without drivers licence. This would be exactly the same than the ID card here. Wolfgang
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-24 09:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2015072409264041871-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #21263 |
On 2015-07-24 13:38:15 +0000, Wolfgang Barth <barthwo@spamfence.net> said: > Am 24.07.2015 um 14:32 schrieb Michael Eyd: >>>> >>>>> Hotels depend in their handling (AFAIK) from country to country, in >>>>> Germany e.g. I think I never needed an identity card for many years. >>>> >>>> I remember, in Italy, they *took* my passport from me! >>>> I was shocked. It was their *rule*. >>> >>> So how can people who don't hold passports ever stay at hotels in >>> Italy? >> >> Bear in mind that in Europe (other than in the US) most countries have >> an identity card, which serves as the primary identification method >> there. And for travels inside Europe a European hardly ever needs a >> passport, the identity card is sufficient for travelling to most countries. >> > Yes, thats correct. Most people dont have a passport because its only > needed for travel in non-european countries. > > I think the drivers licence is used for ID in the US in most cases. In the US a drivers licence is the usual photo ID. > I heard there is a "non-drivers-licence" card for people without drivers > licence. This would be exactly the same than the ID card here. For non-drivers who need a photo ID there are usually State ID cards. There is no US national ID card. However, there is some political movement for one. Regarding US passports, US citizens have the option to obtain a "passport card" in addition to a standard passport. This is used for travel between the US, Canada, Mexico, Caribbean countries, and Burmuda at land border crossings, or sea ports-of-entry, since the requirements for crossing those borders changed from just needing a drivers license to having a passport. <http://travel.state.gov/content/passports/english/passports/information/card/Difference-Between-Passport-Book-and-Card.html> -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 13:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <8bbb0$55b3c5eb$adb2d18a$25839@nntpswitch.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #21263 |
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:38:15 +0200, Wolfgang Barth wrote: > I think the drivers licence is used for ID in the US in most cases. > > I heard there is a "non-drivers-licence" card for people without drivers > licence. This would be exactly the same than the ID card here. In California you can have either or both a drivers' license or/and an identity card, which look exactly the same, and which use the *same* number. The only difference is that one is a license and the other is an identity card. Both last a few years and expire as a birthday present to you on your birthday.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 11:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <20150725111932262-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #21285 |
On 2015-07-25 17:22:51 +0000, "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> said: > On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:38:15 +0200, Wolfgang Barth wrote: > >> I think the drivers licence is used for ID in the US in most cases. >> >> I heard there is a "non-drivers-licence" card for people without drivers >> licence. This would be exactly the same than the ID card here. > > In California you can have either or both a drivers' license or/and an > identity card, which look exactly the same, and which use the *same* > number. > > The only difference is that one is a license and the other is an identity > card. Both last a few years and expire as a birthday present to you on > your birthday. ...and if you haven't been particularly naughty, you can renew online. -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 13:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <12243$55b3c49e$adb2d18a$25839@nntpswitch.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #21260 |
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:32:00 +0200, Michael Eyd wrote: > Bear in mind that in Europe (other than in the US) most countries have > an identity card, which serves as the primary identification method > there. And for travels inside Europe a European hardly ever needs a > passport, the identity card is sufficient for travelling to most > countries. It that "identity card" the same as a drivers' license? By that, I mean most USA citizens "own" an identity card, which is their Social Security Card, but nobody carries it around with them. Almost everyone over about age 16 or 17 (depending on the state) has a drivers' license, which is what is used as a de-facto identity card in almost all instances. In some states, they make an identity card, which, by the way, in California looks EXACTLY the same as a drivers' license, even down to the *same ID number!*, but it isn't a drivers' license. In fact, as a test, I often show that identity card instead of my drivers' license when I rent a car, and they take it all the time, not even noticing that it's different. However, I think very few people have an "identity card" that isn't their drivers' license. Is it the same in Europe?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 11:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2015072511180583873-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #21284 |
On 2015-07-25 17:17:18 +0000, "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> said: > On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:32:00 +0200, Michael Eyd wrote: > >> Bear in mind that in Europe (other than in the US) most countries have >> an identity card, which serves as the primary identification method >> there. And for travels inside Europe a European hardly ever needs a >> passport, the identity card is sufficient for travelling to most >> countries. > > It that "identity card" the same as a drivers' license? > > By that, I mean most USA citizens "own" an identity card, which is their > Social Security Card, but nobody carries it around with them. Strange, my somewhat wrinkled social security card has the following words printed just below my signature: "FOR SOCIAL SECURITY AND TAX PURPOSES-NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" The social security card is not an ID card. It is not remotely a photo ID. Most importantly it should never be used as an ID card. > Almost everyone over about age 16 or 17 (depending on the state) has a > drivers' license, which is what is used as a de-facto identity card in > almost all instances. > > In some states, they make an identity card, which, by the way, in > California looks EXACTLY the same as a drivers' license, even down to the > *same ID number!*, but it isn't a drivers' license. Yup! However, the prefix letter is different. > In fact, as a test, I often show that identity card instead of my > drivers' license when I rent a car, and they take it all the time, not > even noticing that it's different. Then they are idiots. > However, I think very few people have an "identity card" that isn't their > drivers' license. I have two, one of which is in a badge wallet, and which notes my status as a retired Lieutenant from a California Law enforcement agency. > Is it the same in Europe? -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-25 19:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d1i7f3Fqh8cU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #21284 |
M.L. <me@privacy.invalid> wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:32:00 +0200, Michael Eyd wrote: > > > Bear in mind that in Europe (other than in the US) most countries have > > an identity card, which serves as the primary identification method > > there. And for travels inside Europe a European hardly ever needs a > > passport, the identity card is sufficient for travelling to most > > countries. > > It that "identity card" the same as a drivers' license? > > By that, I mean most USA citizens "own" an identity card, which is their > Social Security Card, but nobody carries it around with them. > > Almost everyone over about age 16 or 17 (depending on the state) has a > drivers' license, which is what is used as a de-facto identity card in > almost all instances. > > In some states, they make an identity card, which, by the way, in > California looks EXACTLY the same as a drivers' license, even down to the > *same ID number!*, but it isn't a drivers' license. > > In fact, as a test, I often show that identity card instead of my > drivers' license when I rent a car, and they take it all the time, not > even noticing that it's different. > > However, I think very few people have an "identity card" that isn't their > drivers' license. > > Is it the same in Europe? Contrary to popular belief, there's no such thing as 'Europe' (like, BTW, there's no such thing as 'the US'), but in many European countries you always have to be able to identify yourself. That is done with an identity card or a passport. While often a driver's license is accepted for identification, it's not an official document for identifying, but as the name indicates, a *license* to drive something(s). I live in The Netherlands. We need to carry an identity card or a passport. I have a passport, but don't carry it, way too risky to lose it (and my nice AU entry/exit stamps :-)). Instead, I carry my driver's license, because I need that anyway. Nobody has ever asked for my ID, so sofar so good.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-27 09:46 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mp4nlb$gvc$1@news.sap-ag.de> |
| In reply to | #21284 |
Am 25.07.2015 um 19:17 schrieb M.L.: > On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:32:00 +0200, Michael Eyd wrote: > >> Bear in mind that in Europe (other than in the US) most countries have >> an identity card, which serves as the primary identification method >> there. And for travels inside Europe a European hardly ever needs a >> passport, the identity card is sufficient for travelling to most >> countries. > > It that "identity card" the same as a drivers' license? No, not at all. For Germany: Two completely different documents, for many decades even of completely different formats. In any case they serve completely different purposes, and exchangeability is very limited. > By that, I mean most USA citizens "own" an identity card, which is their > Social Security Card, but nobody carries it around with them. > > Almost everyone over about age 16 or 17 (depending on the state) has a > drivers' license, which is what is used as a de-facto identity card in > almost all instances. A driver's license is not an ID card, though in some situations it will be accepted as such (e.g. if only your age is to be checked when buying alcoholic beverages, or to verify that you're the person you claim to be when acting as a blood donor). In other situations it will not be sufficient, e.g. if your address needs to be verified (which is not part of the driver's license). > In some states, they make an identity card, which, by the way, in > California looks EXACTLY the same as a drivers' license, even down to the > *same ID number!*, but it isn't a drivers' license. For Germany: Different numbers. Actually, for decades we even didn't have anything like a 'real' number on our driver's licenses, only a list number identifying some archived forms from your drivers tests. Virtually useless - and many times giving problems trying to rent a car in the US... ;-) > In fact, as a test, I often show that identity card instead of my > drivers' license when I rent a car, and they take it all the time, not > even noticing that it's different. No good here, as it wouldn't prove your license to drive the car in question - and the agents here know the difference... ;-) > However, I think very few people have an "identity card" that isn't their > drivers' license. > > Is it the same in Europe? No, not in Germany. For Germany, >>90% of all adults can be expected to have an ID card, and many even carry it with them all the time (though it is not legally required (which many Germans think), it has its advantages). Best regards, Michael
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 03:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <166agq5991moh$.9mo4cqsa7oqq.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #21284 |
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 13:17:18 -0400, M.L. wrote:
> most USA citizens "own" an identity card, which is their
> Social Security Card ...
It carries no likeness of the citizen, though, i.e., is not "Photo ID" ...
> ... but nobody carries it around with them.
Why carry around ID that's not accepted as ID? the SS card is as useless
for ID as a Voter Registration card is (even my local polling place wants
"Photo ID", not my VR card :-{ ).
Cheers, -- tlvp
--
Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 06:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2015080406591521951-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #21650 |
On 2015-08-04 07:50:09 +0000, tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> said:
> On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 13:17:18 -0400, M.L. wrote:
>
>> most USA citizens "own" an identity card, which is their
>> Social Security Card ...
>
> It carries no likeness of the citizen, though, i.e., is not "Photo ID" ...
>
>> ... but nobody carries it around with them.
>
> Why carry around ID that's not accepted as ID? the SS card is as useless
> for ID as a Voter Registration card is (even my local polling place wants
> "Photo ID", not my VR card :-{ ).
Not only is the SS card useless as ID it is actually illegal for a
vendor to demand it as ID. So much so that right under the signature
line are these words:
"FOR SOCIAL SECURITY AND TAX PURPOSES-NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION"
...and which State do you live in that photo ID is required at a polling place?
--
Regards,
Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 16:21 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mpqhon$5fj$1@news.sap-ag.de> |
| In reply to | #21660 |
Am 04.08.2015 um 15:59 schrieb Savageduck: > ...and which State do you live in that photo ID is required at a polling > place? In the US you're not required to prove that you're the one your claiming to be at a polling place? Sounds strange to me... Over here in Germany the rule is rather simple: If you can't prove that you're the one who's listed on the voters registration card (like a postal card), you won't get anywhere near the ballot box. And the usual way for this identification is by means of the ID card, which always is a photo ID. Best regards, Michael
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 08:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2015080408522621545-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #21662 |
On 2015-08-04 14:21:11 +0000, Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> said: > Am 04.08.2015 um 15:59 schrieb Savageduck: > >> ...and which State do you live in that photo ID is required at a polling >> place? > > In the US you're not required to prove that you're the one your > claiming to be at a polling place? Sounds strange to me... It depends on the State. In California where I live, once registered to vote I have options to vote at my local precinct polling place, which for me is within easy walking distance from my home. All that is required is to have my name (without ID) checked against the local registration roster, and for me to sign that roster. I can also choose to vote by mail, or as an absentee voter. There are several different ways to register to vote in California, but all are controlled by the office of the California Secretary of State. <http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voter-registration/> Different States have different rules for voter registration and actual voting. > Over here in Germany the rule is rather simple: If you can't prove that > you're the one who's listed on the voters registration card (like a > postal card), you won't get anywhere near the ballot box. And the usual > way for this identification is by means of the ID card, which always is > a photo ID. > > Best regards, > > Michael -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 05:30 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <d2ci77Ffjk1U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #21664 |
Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote
> Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> wrote
>> Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote
>>> ...and which State do you live in that photo ID is required at a polling
>>> place?
>> In the US you're not required to prove that you're the one your claiming
>> to be at a polling place? Sounds strange to me...
> It depends on the State. In California where I live, once registered to
> vote I have options to vote at my local precinct polling place, which for
> me is within easy walking distance from my home. All that is required is
> to have my name (without ID) checked against the local registration
> roster, and for me to sign that roster.
We don’t sign anything, a line is rules thru your entry on the register
because here its compulsory to vote and they check that that way.
No ID required at all.
> I can also choose to vote by mail, or as an absentee voter.
Same here. And online now.
> There are several different ways to register to vote in California, but
> all are controlled by the office of the California Secretary of State.
> <http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voter-registration/>
We do have the electoral roll, but its national not state, and its
organised by the same operation that handles the voting in elections.
> Different States have different rules for voter registration and actual
> voting.
Ours are all national.
>> Over here in Germany the rule is rather simple: If you can't prove that
>> you're the one who's listed on the voters registration card (like a
>> postal card), you won't get anywhere near the ballot box. And the usual
>> way for this identification is by means of the ID card, which always is a
>> photo ID.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 19:33 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <55C0F755.40329947@B.Maus.De> |
| In reply to | #21662 |
Michael Eyd wrote: > Over here in Germany the rule is rather simple: If you can't prove that > you're the one who's listed on the voters registration card (like a > postal card), you won't get anywhere near the ballot box. And the usual > way for this identification is by means of the ID card, which always is > a photo ID. Don't mislead the good people here. The voting attendents *can* ask for ID, in my experience /the experience of decades by now) they never ever do. I think they ought to avoid fraud, but they don't. Axel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 09:39 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mpv300$4vm$1@news.sap-ag.de> |
| In reply to | #21667 |
Am 04.08.2015 um 19:33 schrieb Axel Berger: > Michael Eyd wrote: >> Over here in Germany the rule is rather simple: If you can't prove that >> you're the one who's listed on the voters registration card (like a >> postal card), you won't get anywhere near the ballot box. And the usual >> way for this identification is by means of the ID card, which always is >> a photo ID. > > Don't mislead the good people here. The voting attendents *can* ask for > ID, in my experience /the experience of decades by now) they never ever > do. AFAIR I have been asked for the ID several times, though most of the time I tend to directly display it together with the voters card. If I'm voting via mail, then obviously no ID check is performed, only several signatures 'prove' that I and I alone voted... ;-) > I think they ought to avoid fraud, but they don't. Might depend on the region? Or just (bad) luck? Best regards, Michael
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 12:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mpr30g$aqb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21662 |
On 08/04/2015 07:21 AM, Michael Eyd wrote: > Am 04.08.2015 um 15:59 schrieb Savageduck: > >> ...and which State do you live in that photo ID is required at a polling >> place? > > In the US you're not required to prove that you're the one your claiming > to be at a polling place? Sounds strange to me... Me too, but there it is. Some claim it's a civil rights thing because some people find it difficult to obtain proper documentation even though they were born in the US. I think it's because politicians want to toady to illegals in order to get their votes or to increase the number of inhabitants of their districts or just because they're shitheads. If you're not smart enough to figure out how to obtain the proper documentation, perhaps you aren't smart enough to even think about voting. Some say that even the hopelessly stupid deserve representation, but I think they already have it. > Over here in Germany the rule is rather simple: If you can't prove that > you're the one who's listed on the voters registration card (like a > postal card), you won't get anywhere near the ballot box. And the usual > way for this identification is by means of the ID card, which always is > a photo ID. Good for Deutschland! -- Cheers, Bev ======================================== If I gave a shit, you'd be the first one I'd give it to.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 05:41 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <d2cir3FfosrU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #21673 |
The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote > Michael Eyd wrote >> Savageduck wrote >>> ...and which State do you live in that >>> photo ID is required at a polling place? >> In the US you're not required to prove that you're the one your >> claiming to be at a polling place? Sounds strange to me... > Me too, Not to anyone in most of the english speaking world. > but there it is. Some claim it's a civil rights thing because some > people find it difficult to obtain proper documentation even though > they were born in the US. I think it's because politicians want to > toady to illegals in order to get their votes or to increase the number > of inhabitants of their districts or just because they're shitheads. Its actually because those who vote for a particular party are rather less likely to have a photo ID. Nothing to do with illegals who can get one any time they want one. > If you're not smart enough to figure out how to obtain the proper > documentation, perhaps you aren't smart enough to even think > about voting. Some say that even the hopelessly stupid deserve > representation, but I think they already have it. >> Over here in Germany the rule is rather simple: If you can't prove that >> you're the one who's listed on the voters registration card (like a >> postal card), you won't get anywhere near the ballot box. And the usual >> way for this identification is by means of the ID card, which always is >> a photo ID. > Good for Deutschland! Even sillier than you usually manage. And he lied about that anyway.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 18 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web