Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #21077 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-20 14:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-06 17:24 +0200 |
| Articles | 11 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
Order of microUSB charger connecting/disconnecting Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 14:10 +0200
Re: Order of microUSB charger connecting/disconnecting Joe Beanfish <joebeanfish@nospam.duh> - 2015-07-20 13:08 +0000
Re: Order of microUSB charger connecting/disconnecting J0HNS0N <12J0HNSON1022@92300nomail.com> - 2015-07-20 09:58 -0700
Re: Order of microUSB charger connecting/disconnecting tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-03 19:48 -0400
Re: Order of microUSB charger connecting/disconnecting Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 01:58 +0200
Re: Order of microUSB charger connecting/disconnecting Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2015-08-04 10:46 +0100
Re: Order of microUSB charger connecting/disconnecting Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 13:06 +0200
Re: Order of microUSB charger connecting/disconnecting Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2015-08-05 15:59 +0100
Re: Order of microUSB charger connecting/disconnecting Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 17:45 +0200
Re: Order of microUSB charger connecting/disconnecting Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2015-08-06 14:58 +0100
Re: Order of microUSB charger connecting/disconnecting Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 17:24 +0200
| From | Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-20 14:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Order of microUSB charger connecting/disconnecting |
| Message-ID | <moioc6$r54$1@dont-email.me> |
I read time by time contradictory advices for the order of microUSB (referred as uUSB ) charger connecting/disconnecting. I mean it in context of durability of Android devices and their uUSB versatile connectors, wrt to transient effects. Some advices say to connect/disconnect the charger from the grid first, other advices say to connect/disconnect the uUSB first, other ones say to connect the microUSB first, but disconnect charger first. Connecting charger first / disconnecting uUSB first may speak for avoiding eventual voltage shocks due transient states of charger (dis)connecting. Disconnecting charger first / connecting uUSB first may speak for avoiding microUSB connector wearing out due eventual micro sparks, especially at disconnecting. Some users says uUSB pins can get even burnt by these effects. As I am not an expert on wearing out factors in electronics, I would like to hear opinions in context of uUSB charged devices, eventually in general context of related electronics. -- Poutnik
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe Beanfish <joebeanfish@nospam.duh> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-20 13:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <moirst$6u9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21077 |
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:10:07 +0200, Poutnik wrote: > I read time by time contradictory advices for the order of microUSB > (referred as uUSB ) charger connecting/disconnecting. > > I mean it in context of durability of Android devices and their uUSB > versatile connectors, wrt to transient effects. My experience is to plug and unplug the same device (S3) from the microUSB port multiple times a day for 2+ years without issue. I rarely unplug or turn off the wall wart (or computer connection depending on which charger I'm using).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | J0HNS0N <12J0HNSON1022@92300nomail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-20 09:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <em9qqa9g4f54a2hk69hvo1948k4k1dkdo2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #21077 |
Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> wrote: >As I am not an expert on wearing out factors in electronics, >I would like to hear opinions in context of uUSB charged devices, >eventually in general context of related electronics. I certainly am no expert. But in my case I've never worried about all that. Most of my chargers stay plugged in for convenience. Never had a problem. Even had a cheap Target charger fail once and the phone screen was blinking off and on when I found it. Still no device damage. IMO it's a big PITA worry about that kind of thing but YMMV. BTW I've never had a device fail (knocks on wood). It has always become obsolete first, or I just wanted a new one. Usually within 2 years or so.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-03 19:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <km18po6axn4n$.1dl6nipqzbbtf$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #21077 |
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:10:07 +0200, Poutnik wrote: > ... time by time ... Kindly allow me to suggest "from time to time" :-) . Cheers, -- tlvp -- Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 01:58 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mpov3k$8mp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21635 |
Dne 04/08/2015 v 01:48 tlvp napsal(a): > On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:10:07 +0200, Poutnik wrote: > >> ... time by time ... > > Kindly allow me to suggest "from time to time" :-) . Cheers, -- tlvp > Or occasionally, not to be in doubt... :-) -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 10:46 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <VA.00000ab3.08edab5f@me.invalid> |
| In reply to | #21636 |
In article <mpov3k$8mp$1@dont-email.me>, Poutnik wrote: > Dne 04/08/2015 v 01:48 tlvp napsal(a): >> On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:10:07 +0200, Poutnik wrote: >> >>> ... time by time ... >> >> Kindly allow me to suggest "from time to time" :-) . Cheers, -- tlvp > > Or occasionally, not to be in doubt... :-) Or just "sometimes", which sounds more natural to my ears. -- Cheers, Daniel.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 13:06 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mpq683$kcn$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21654 |
On 08/04/2015 11:46 AM, Daniel James wrote: > In article <mpov3k$8mp$1@dont-email.me>, Poutnik wrote: >> Dne 04/08/2015 v 01:48 tlvp napsal(a): >>> On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:10:07 +0200, Poutnik wrote: >>> >>>> ... time by time ... >>> >>> Kindly allow me to suggest "from time to time" :-) . Cheers, -- tlvp >> >> Or occasionally, not to be in doubt... :-) > > Or just "sometimes", which sounds more natural to my ears. > Does not put sometimes less stress on re-occurrence ? -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 15:59 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <VA.00000ab4.0f3231a1@me.invalid> |
| In reply to | #21657 |
In article <mpq683$kcn$1@dont-email.me>, Poutnik wrote: > On 08/04/2015 11:46 AM, Daniel James wrote: >> In article <mpov3k$8mp$1@dont-email.me>, Poutnik wrote: >>> Dne 04/08/2015 v 01:48 tlvp napsal(a): >>>> On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:10:07 +0200, Poutnik wrote: >>>> >>>>> ... time by time ... >>>> >>>> Kindly allow me to suggest "from time to time" :-) . Cheers, -- tlvp >>> >>> Or occasionally, not to be in doubt... :-) >> >> Or just "sometimes", which sounds more natural to my ears. > > Does not put sometimes less stress on re-occurrence ? No, not at all. I certainly wouldn't use "sometimes" to describe something that only happened once. -- Cheers, Daniel.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 17:45 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mptavb$v3s$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21691 |
On 08/05/2015 04:59 PM, Daniel James wrote: > In article <mpq683$kcn$1@dont-email.me>, Poutnik wrote: >> On 08/04/2015 11:46 AM, Daniel James wrote: >>> In article <mpov3k$8mp$1@dont-email.me>, Poutnik wrote: >>>> Dne 04/08/2015 v 01:48 tlvp napsal(a): >>>>> On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:10:07 +0200, Poutnik wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> ... time by time ... >>>>> >>>>> Kindly allow me to suggest "from time to time" :-) . Cheers, -- > tlvp >>>> >>>> Or occasionally, not to be in doubt... :-) >>> >>> Or just "sometimes", which sounds more natural to my ears. >> >> Does not put sometimes less stress on re-occurrence ? > > No, not at all. > > I certainly wouldn't use "sometimes" to describe something that only > happened once. > Less stress does not mean exclusion. -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 14:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <VA.00000ab5.1420e6b9@me.invalid> |
| In reply to | #21692 |
In article <mptavb$v3s$1@dont-email.me>, Poutnik wrote: >> I certainly wouldn't use "sometimes" to describe something that only >> happened once. > > > Less stress does not mean exclusion. No, it doesn't. Perhaps you are misunderstanding the meaning of "certainly" in my reply? -- Cheers, Daniel.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 17:24 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mpvu44$2is$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21741 |
On 08/06/2015 03:58 PM, Daniel James wrote: > In article <mptavb$v3s$1@dont-email.me>, Poutnik wrote: >>> I certainly wouldn't use "sometimes" to describe something that only >>> happened once. >> >> >> Less stress does not mean exclusion. > > No, it doesn't. > > Perhaps you are misunderstanding the meaning of "certainly" in my reply? > I do not suppose so, but I may have been confused by turning to one time events. As I would use sometimes to describe something that happens only once, if it was not intention to happen justy once. there may be opportuunity to happen once, twice, or more times. but all taht may be fine tuning the meaning and word play, and I may not get all that correcly as not native. -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web