Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #34619 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-23 01:22 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-09-23 17:03 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 38 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> - 2016-09-23 01:22 +0000
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-23 01:25 +0000
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-22 21:39 -0400
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> - 2016-09-23 03:32 +0000
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> - 2016-09-23 01:48 +0000
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-09-23 02:21 +0000
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-22 19:38 -0700
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-22 19:58 -0700
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> - 2016-09-23 03:19 +0000
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-09-22 23:27 -0400
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> - 2016-09-23 03:47 +0000
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-22 20:46 -0700
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hartman@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 04:05 +0000
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> - 2016-09-23 11:45 +0000
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hartman@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 13:11 +0000
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> - 2016-09-23 16:08 +0000
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-09-24 01:35 -0400
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> - 2016-09-24 15:34 +0000
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-09-24 18:19 -0400
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-09-23 00:42 -0400
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> - 2016-09-23 11:44 +0000
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Andreas Rutishauser <andreas@macandreas.ch> - 2016-09-23 06:56 +0200
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-22 22:38 -0700
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> - 2016-09-23 12:34 +0000
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-23 10:05 -0700
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 13:32 +1000
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-09-23 00:48 -0400
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-09-23 00:34 -0400
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> - 2016-09-23 12:42 +0000
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-09-23 08:26 +0200
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> - 2016-09-23 12:33 +0000
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-09-23 14:39 -0400
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2016-09-23 10:07 +0100
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> - 2016-09-23 12:33 +0000
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> - 2016-09-23 12:36 +0000
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? "Mark W." <markawillson@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 06:24 -0700
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> - 2016-09-23 16:08 +0000
Re: How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 17:03 +0000
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
| From | Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-23 01:22 +0000 |
| Subject | How to check validity of suspicious looking SMS message text URL? |
| Message-ID | <ns2051$15hl$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Is there *anything* a user can do to check the URL without going to that URL? Just received this text on my cell phone: http://i.cubeupload.com/k8CbNK.png All I know is where it (says it) comes from: http://i.cubeupload.com/QD1o9F.png Of course, I could just delete it (and will); but my question here is how can I find out *more information* about whether this is a phishing attempt of some sort. Of course, the text itself has to be ignored - and I'm pretty sure the phone number itself can easily be spoofed (spoofcard, for example), so the only real hint of the purpose is at the end of the URL. The domain of the URL appears to be a redirector site (much like tinyurl.com); so what matters most is the payload at the end of the URL. Without actually going to that URL, is there a way to find out *more data* about what this message is all about? For example, is there a trusted aggregator where we can *forward* such messages to? Or is there a web site where we can paste in the URL to find out more data? I googled the URL, but the result was "Your search - message http://bit.do/cBuHr 681-207-8069 - did not match any documents". Is there *anything* a user can do to check the URL without going to that URL?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-23 01:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ns20ai$ic3$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #34619 |
On 2016-09-23, Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> wrote: > Is there *anything* a user can do to check the URL without going to that > URL? > ... > > For example, is there a trusted aggregator where we can *forward* such > messages to? Yes, firefox uses google servers for that. -- press any key to continue or any other to quit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-22 21:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <220920162139507952%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #34619 |
In article <ns2051$15hl$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> wrote: > > Just received this text on my cell phone: > http://i.cubeupload.com/k8CbNK.png tap it!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-23 03:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ns27ov$1dj8$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #34621 |
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:39:50 -0400, nospam wrote: >> Just received this text on my cell phone: >> http://i.cubeupload.com/k8CbNK.png > > tap it! As always, you are an expert at being amazingly unhelpful.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-23 01:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ns21lp$172c$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #34619 |
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 01:22:42 +0000 (UTC), Horace Algiers wrote: > Is there *anything* a user can do to check the URL without going to that > URL? > > Just received this text on my cell phone: > http://i.cubeupload.com/k8CbNK.png > > All I know is where it (says it) comes from: > http://i.cubeupload.com/QD1o9F.png This does not answer the question, but I did forward the suspicious text to T-mobile at "spam" (aka 7726) from my SMS client: http://i.cubeupload.com/tkSPkz.jpg While that does nothing to help me identify the reputed payload, it does alert T-Mobile to the spam (and potential SMSishing attack, but I have no way of knowing if they were phishing or spamming or doing anything else maliciously as I didn't visit the URL). I just want to know how to *investigate* the URL. Meanwhile... For those on T-Mobile, here's what they recommend for SMS spam: http://www.t-mobile.com/company/privacy-resources/spam/sms-spam.html And it's the same, essentially, for SMishing attacks: http://www.t-mobile.com/company/privacy-resources/spam/phishing.html We could also send email to privacy@T-Mobile.com if we think it's someone impersonating T-Mobile themselves. The phone number of the sender can easily be spoofed, as explained here: https://support.t-mobile.com/docs/DOC-2747 The FTC recommends we forward phishing messages to "spam@uce.gov" and to "reportphishing@antiphishing.org", which is an Anti-Phishing Working Group (whatever that means). https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0003-phishing If you're on AT&T, they recommend forwarding it to "abuse@att.net": http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=22157&cdvn=news&newsarticleid=33564&mapcode= Verizon suggests phishing@verizonwireless.com http://www.verizonwireless.com/support/phishing-faqs/ It seems that fraud.org is also interested in "your story": http://www.fraud.org/homepage?splash=1 None of these above answer the question of how to *investigate* the URL without actually clicking on the URL - so that's why I ask here...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-23 02:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnnu94du.56m.g.kreme@snow.local> |
| In reply to | #34619 |
In message <ns2051$15hl$1@gioia.aioe.org> Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> wrote: > Is there *anything* a user can do to check the URL without going to that > URL? > Just received this text on my cell phone: > http://i.cubeupload.com/k8CbNK.png > All I know is where it (says it) comes from: > http://i.cubeupload.com/QD1o9F.png > Of course, I could just delete it (and will); but my question here is how > can I find out *more information* about whether this is a phishing attempt > of some sort. `whois cubeupload.com` might be a start. > The domain of the URL appears to be a redirector site (much like > tinyurl.com); so what matters most is the payload at the end of the URL. Which is a png. > Without actually going to that URL, is there a way to find out *more data* > about what this message is all about? It is an image. > For example, is there a trusted aggregator where we can *forward* such > messages to? No. -- if you ever get that chimp off your back, if you ever find the thing you lack, ah but you know you're only having a laugh. Oh, oh here we go again -- until the end.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-22 19:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D409E3CA.7E1AE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #34619 |
On 9/22/16, 6:22 PM, in article ns2051$15hl$1@gioia.aioe.org, "Horace
Algiers" <horace@horacealgiers.com> wrote:
> Is there *anything* a user can do to check the URL without going to that
> URL?
>
> Just received this text on my cell phone:
> http://i.cubeupload.com/k8CbNK.png
>
> All I know is where it (says it) comes from:
> http://i.cubeupload.com/QD1o9F.png
>
> Of course, I could just delete it (and will); but my question here is how
> can I find out *more information* about whether this is a phishing attempt
> of some sort.
>
> Of course, the text itself has to be ignored - and I'm pretty sure the
> phone number itself can easily be spoofed (spoofcard, for example), so the
> only real hint of the purpose is at the end of the URL.
>
> The domain of the URL appears to be a redirector site (much like
> tinyurl.com); so what matters most is the payload at the end of the URL.
>
> Without actually going to that URL, is there a way to find out *more data*
> about what this message is all about?
>
> For example, is there a trusted aggregator where we can *forward* such
> messages to?
>
> Or is there a web site where we can paste in the URL to find out more data?
>
> I googled the URL, but the result was "Your search - message
> http://bit.do/cBuHr 681-207-8069 - did not match any documents".
>
> Is there *anything* a user can do to check the URL without going to that
> URL?
<http://bit.do/faq/#preview>
-----
How to preview shortened URLs?
You can find out what is the destination address (expand a short
link) and view to where the link will redirect without going to
the final destination. Just add "/expand/" to the short link
address. Example: http://bit.do/expand/shortlink
-----
So in the case of yours go to http://bit.do/expand/cBuHr
That will tell you:
-----
Short link: http://bit.do/[REDACTED]
Redirects to: http://www.rbusvv.com/
-----
From there I went to: <http://whois.domaintools.com/rbusvv.com>
Gives you some info and a screen shot. There is also info on them online:
<http://www.scamadviser.com/is-rbusv.com-a-fake-site.html>
-----
Low Trust Rating. This Site May Not Be Safe to Use.
-----
I think I would avoid it. :)
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-22 19:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D409E87F.7E1BB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #34624 |
On 9/22/16, 7:38 PM, in article D409E3CA.7E1AE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com, "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/22/16, 6:22 PM, in article ns2051$15hl$1@gioia.aioe.org, "Horace > Algiers" <horace@horacealgiers.com> wrote: > >> Is there *anything* a user can do to check the URL without going to that >> URL? >> >> Just received this text on my cell phone: >> http://i.cubeupload.com/k8CbNK.png >> >> All I know is where it (says it) comes from: >> http://i.cubeupload.com/QD1o9F.png >> >> Of course, I could just delete it (and will); but my question here is how >> can I find out *more information* about whether this is a phishing attempt >> of some sort. >> >> Of course, the text itself has to be ignored - and I'm pretty sure the >> phone number itself can easily be spoofed (spoofcard, for example), so the >> only real hint of the purpose is at the end of the URL. >> >> The domain of the URL appears to be a redirector site (much like >> tinyurl.com); so what matters most is the payload at the end of the URL. >> >> Without actually going to that URL, is there a way to find out *more data* >> about what this message is all about? >> >> For example, is there a trusted aggregator where we can *forward* such >> messages to? >> >> Or is there a web site where we can paste in the URL to find out more data? >> >> I googled the URL, but the result was "Your search - message >> http://bit.do/cBuHr 681-207-8069 - did not match any documents". >> >> Is there *anything* a user can do to check the URL without going to that >> URL? > > <http://bit.do/faq/#preview> > ----- > How to preview shortened URLs? > You can find out what is the destination address (expand a short > link) and view to where the link will redirect without going to > the final destination. Just add "/expand/" to the short link > address. Example: http://bit.do/expand/shortlink > ----- > > So in the case of yours go to http://bit.do/expand/cBuHr > > That will tell you: > ----- > Short link: http://bit.do/[REDACTED] > Redirects to: http://www.rbusvv.com/ > ----- And I goofed. Do not click on the link right about this one. Redacted one and then did not the other. Um, oops. > From there I went to: <http://whois.domaintools.com/rbusvv.com> > > Gives you some info and a screen shot. There is also info on them online: > > <http://www.scamadviser.com/is-rbusv.com-a-fake-site.html> > ----- > Low Trust Rating. This Site May Not Be Safe to Use. > ----- > > I think I would avoid it. :) > -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-23 03:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ns270n$qk6$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #34624 |
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:38:50 -0700, Snit wrote: > How to preview shortened URLs? > You can find out what is the destination address (expand a short > link) and view to where the link will redirect without going to > the final destination. Just add "/expand/" to the short link > address. Example: http://bit.do/expand/shortlink > ----- > > So in the case of yours go to http://bit.do/expand/cBuHr > > That will tell you: > ----- > Short link: http://bit.do/[REDACTED] > Redirects to: http://www.rbusvv.com/ > ----- > > From there I went to: <http://whois.domaintools.com/rbusvv.com> > > Gives you some info and a screen shot. There is also info on them online: > > <http://www.scamadviser.com/is-rbusv.com-a-fake-site.html> > ----- > Low Trust Rating. This Site May Not Be Safe to Use. > ----- > > I think I would avoid it. :) Thank you for both *understanding* the question, and for being *helpful* in your response, especially since everyone can benefit from your advice. I did not know about the *expand* option, so I just tried it on a tinyurl: http://tinyurl.com/alt-os-linux http://tinyurlcom/expand/alt-os-linux Hmmm... it did not seem to work. It reported nothing, when it should have reported: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/alt.os.linux To test if the "expand" only works with "bit.do" URLs, I created this: Short URL: http://bit.do/alt-os-linux Traffic stats: http://bit.do/alt-os-linux- Which should point to that Google Groups URL for alt.os.linux. http://i.cubeupload.com/loFJs7.jpg Once created, I tried the *expand* option with bit.do to get: http://bit.do/expand/alt-os-linux Which did work by reporting: Short link: http://bit.do/alt-os-linux Redirects to: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/alt.os.linux So, thanks for the "expand" option for bit.do; now we need the same option for tinyurl.com. Googling, I found this site: http://www.getlinkinfo.com/ And entering the tinyurl http://tinyurl.com/alt-os-linux, it reported a decent amount of good stuff about that shortened URL. Looking at your whois link was interesting, but didn't show scamming: http://whois.domaintools.com/rbusvv.com But looking at your scam advisor site, there is a ton of conflicting info: http://www.scamadviser.com/is-rbusv.com-a-fake-site.html For example, the WHOIS implicates Las Vegas and CN but the *addresses* in China are oddly European: Admin Name: Helmut Kohl Admin Organization: Helmut Kohl Admin Street: 78 Messegel auml nde Neue Messe Admin State/Province: Freistaat Bayern Admin Postal Code: 81477 Admin Country: CN Admin Phone: +86.004908209145 Admin Email: blucemall@gmail.com So I suspect the *address* doesn't exist in China. Conflictingly, the scam advisor web site tells us the site is in Turkey but most likely in China. Here is their analysis: Website: rbusv.com Title: Fashion Sunglasses Online Sales, Fashion Sunglasses Online Sales Description: Fashion Sunglasses Online Sales Domain Age: 0 Days Website Speed: Average Organisation: huiru li Owner: huiru li Owner Address: an yang shi zheng da dong lu 9985 hao Owner City: anyangshi Owner Postcode: 351100 Phone Number: +86.18403310655 [China] Phone Type: generic: Email: 2926033044@qq.com [China] Related to 14 sites Owner Country : China [China] Website Location : Turkey [Turkey] Probable website origin :- 80%; [China] China 14%; [United States] United States 6%; [Turkey] Turkey Notes:- [Alert Result] Registered contact email address is a free one [Alert Result] Technical contact email address is a free one [Alert Result] Administrative contact email address is a free one [Alert Result] This registrar is used by a high % of spammers and fraud sites [Alert Result] This website may be related to a number of high risk sites [Alert Result] This website may be related to a number of high risk sites [Alert Result] This website is 0 Days old [Alert Result] The website expected life (364 days) is relatively short. [Alert Result] This website setup involves countries known to be high risk [Alert Result] This website is likely to be operating from a high risk country Analysis Details:- This site has a high risk country associated with it. This may be as you expect but care should be taken if purchasing an item from a site that you didn't expect to be associated with the countries listed above. Certain countries are listed as being high risk because of the high percentage of online fraud or tendency to send fake/replica items. Free email addresses have been used in the setup of this website. This is not necesarily worrying, depending on the site. For online shops, this can be a sign that the site has some risk
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-22 23:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <57e4a122$0$17653$b1db1813$19ace300@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #34626 |
Note: the payload may end in .jpg or .png in the URL, but it does not mean that the server will serve that. It could have Content-type: application/octed-stream or somethint else and feed something that will cause a buffer overflow. More importantly, clicking on that URL sends the spammer plenty of information about you because your mobile phone will send chockful of info in the HTTP request. These URLs are often specific to your telephone number so they can then link your HTTP requyest to your phone number by using the request as a key to their database.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-23 03:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ns28jl$1eg5$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #34627 |
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 23:27:28 -0400, JF Mezei wrote: > Note: the payload may end in .jpg or .png in the URL, but it does not > mean that the server will serve that. It could have Content-type: > application/octed-stream or somethint else and feed something that will > cause a buffer overflow. Just to be clear, the URL was *not* an image URL. The "PNG" URL was merely the URL of the screenshot that I uploaded. 1. This is a screenshot I uploaded of the original message: http://i.cubeupload.com/k8CbNK.png 2. This is a screenshot when I clicked for more details: http://i.cubeupload.com/QD1o9F.png 3. And this is a screenshot of what T-Mobile said about it: http://i.cubeupload.com/tkSPkz.jpg There should be no danger in viewing those screenshots. > More importantly, clicking on that URL sends the spammer plenty of > information about you because your mobile phone will send chockful of > info in the HTTP request. > > These URLs are often specific to your telephone number so they can then > link your HTTP requyest to your phone number by using the request as a > key to their database. This is a good point in that nobody should click on the actual URL. And that the actual URL may be specific to my particular phone number. In which case, it gives the sender precise information about my phone. (Although you may note I'm *always* on TOR and VPN concurrently on my phone - so while the phone number is correct, the IP address will always be incorrect.) If others want to run TOR/VPN 100% of the time on the phone, it's easy. Just install "Orbot" https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.torproject.android Note that Orbot has superceded Orfox: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=info.guardianproject.orfox What Orfox gives you is TOR-on-Firefox (similar to the tor-browser-bundle on computers); but what Orbot gives you is that, plus VPN (which is basically Tor on everything).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-22 20:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D409F3C2.7E1CA%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #34626 |
On 9/22/16, 8:19 PM, in article ns270n$qk6$1@news.mixmin.net, "Horace
Algiers" <horace@horacealgiers.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:38:50 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>> How to preview shortened URLs?
>> You can find out what is the destination address (expand a short
>> link) and view to where the link will redirect without going to
>> the final destination. Just add "/expand/" to the short link
>> address. Example: http://bit.do/expand/shortlink
>> -----
>>
>> So in the case of yours go to http://bit.do/expand/cBuHr
>>
>> That will tell you:
>> -----
>> Short link: http://bit.do/[REDACTED]
>> Redirects to: http://www.[redacted].com/
>> -----
>>
>> From there I went to: <http://whois.domaintools.com/rbusvv.com>
>>
>> Gives you some info and a screen shot. There is also info on them online:
>>
>> <http://www.scamadviser.com/is-rbusv.com-a-fake-site.html>
>> -----
>> Low Trust Rating. This Site May Not Be Safe to Use.
>> -----
>>
>> I think I would avoid it. :)
>
> Thank you for both *understanding* the question, and for being *helpful* in
> your response, especially since everyone can benefit from your advice.
Most URL shortners have this ability. Not all though.
> I did not know about the *expand* option, so I just tried it on a tinyurl:
> http://tinyurl.com/alt-os-linux
> http://tinyurlcom/expand/alt-os-linux
>
> Hmmm... it did not seem to work.
> It reported nothing, when it should have reported:
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/alt.os.linux
You can enable previews for ALL tinyurl links:
<http://tinyurl.com/preview.php>
-----
Don't want to be instantly redirected to a TinyURL and instead
want to see where it's going before going to the site? Not a
problem with our preview feature.
-----
But as I looked for that I found this:
<http://www.getlinkinfo.com>
Works great... I will have to remember that. And below I see you found it,
too.
> To test if the "expand" only works with "bit.do" URLs, I created this:
> Short URL: http://bit.do/alt-os-linux
> Traffic stats: http://bit.do/alt-os-linux-
> Which should point to that Google Groups URL for alt.os.linux.
> http://i.cubeupload.com/loFJs7.jpg
>
> Once created, I tried the *expand* option with bit.do to get:
> http://bit.do/expand/alt-os-linux
>
> Which did work by reporting:
> Short link: http://bit.do/alt-os-linux
> Redirects to: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/alt.os.linux
>
> So, thanks for the "expand" option for bit.do; now we need the same option
> for tinyurl.com.
They have one as well.
> Googling, I found this site: http://www.getlinkinfo.com/
> And entering the tinyurl http://tinyurl.com/alt-os-linux, it reported a
> decent amount of good stuff about that shortened URL.
>
> Looking at your whois link was interesting, but didn't show scamming:
> http://whois.domaintools.com/rbusvv.com
>
> But looking at your scam advisor site, there is a ton of conflicting info:
> http://www.scamadviser.com/is-rbusv.com-a-fake-site.html
>
> For example, the WHOIS implicates Las Vegas and CN but the *addresses* in
> China are oddly European:
> Admin Name: Helmut Kohl
> Admin Organization: Helmut Kohl
> Admin Street: 78 Messegel auml nde Neue Messe
> Admin State/Province: Freistaat Bayern
> Admin Postal Code: 81477
> Admin Country: CN
> Admin Phone: +86.004908209145
> Admin Email: blucemall@gmail.com
> So I suspect the *address* doesn't exist in China.
>
> Conflictingly, the scam advisor web site tells us the site is in Turkey but
> most likely in China.
>
> Here is their analysis:
> Website: rbusv.com
> Title: Fashion Sunglasses Online Sales, Fashion Sunglasses Online Sales
> Description: Fashion Sunglasses Online Sales
>
> Domain Age: 0 Days
> Website Speed: Average
>
> Organisation: huiru li
> Owner: huiru li
> Owner Address: an yang shi zheng da dong lu 9985 hao
> Owner City: anyangshi
> Owner Postcode: 351100
> Phone Number: +86.18403310655 [China]
> Phone Type: generic:
> Email: 2926033044@qq.com [China] Related to 14 sites
>
> Owner Country : China [China]
> Website Location : Turkey [Turkey]
>
> Probable website origin :-
> 80%; [China] China
> 14%; [United States] United States
> 6%; [Turkey] Turkey
>
> Notes:-
> [Alert Result] Registered contact email address is a free one
> [Alert Result] Technical contact email address is a free one
> [Alert Result] Administrative contact email address is a free one
> [Alert Result] This registrar is used by a high % of spammers and fraud
> sites
> [Alert Result] This website may be related to a number of high risk sites
> [Alert Result] This website may be related to a number of high risk sites
> [Alert Result] This website is 0 Days old
> [Alert Result] The website expected life (364 days) is relatively short.
> [Alert Result] This website setup involves countries known to be high risk
> [Alert Result] This website is likely to be operating from a high risk
> country
>
> Analysis Details:-
>
> This site has a high risk country associated with it. This may be as you
> expect but care should be taken if purchasing an item from a site that you
> didn't expect to be associated with the countries listed above. Certain
> countries are listed as being high risk because of the high percentage of
> online fraud or tendency to send fake/replica items.
>
> Free email addresses have been used in the setup of this website. This is
> not necesarily worrying, depending on the site. For online shops, this can
> be a sign that the site has some risk
>
>
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hartman@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-23 04:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <57e4a9f9$0$871$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> |
| In reply to | #34626 |
In alt.os.linux Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> wrote: > China are oddly European: > Admin Name: Helmut Kohl > Admin Organization: Helmut Kohl > Admin Street: 78 Messegel auml nde Neue Messe > Admin State/Province: Freistaat Bayern Helmut Kohl is the ex-BundesKansler (Prime Minister) of Germany, the one that accomplished the re-unification of both Germanies. He's 86 now and retired, so this info is most certainly fake.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-23 11:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ns34lj$qlf$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #34632 |
On 23 Sep 2016 04:05:13 GMT, Eef Hartman wrote: > Helmut Kohl is the ex-BundesKansler (Prime Minister) of Germany, > the one that accomplished the re-unification of both Germanies. > He's 86 now and retired, so this info is most certainly fake. Just curious, did he live at "78 Messegel auml nde Neue Messe", in "Freistaat Bayern", or is that also a wholly made-up address?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hartman@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-23 13:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <57e52a10$0$15994$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> |
| In reply to | #34646 |
In alt.os.linux Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> wrote: > Just curious, did he live at "78 Messegel auml nde Neue Messe", in > "Freistaat Bayern", or is that also a wholly made-up address? I don't know his current address, no, but "Freistaat Bayern" is the old name for the federal state of Bavaria (in the south-east of Germany) and I don't believe that's where he's currently living.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-23 16:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ns3k16$1n3c$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #34653 |
On 23 Sep 2016 13:11:44 GMT, Eef Hartman wrote: > I don't know his current address, no, but "Freistaat Bayern" is the > old name for the federal state of Bavaria (in the south-east of > Germany) and I don't believe that's where he's currently living. Thanks. The *entire* set of registered information appeared, from the start, to be bogus, which is just one sign of "something" being fishy. Still, it would be nice if we could forward the SMishing texts in a timely manner to a security researcher who knew what to do with them to track down the specific payload.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-24 01:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <16biuct5x3snd$.1bgemgutc2v1u$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #34646 |
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:45:59 +0000 (UTC), Horace Algiers wrote: > On 23 Sep 2016 04:05:13 GMT, Eef Hartman wrote: > >> Helmut Kohl ... > > Just curious, did he live at "78 Messegel auml nde Neue Messe" ... ? No idea. But "Messegel auml nde" is almost certainly a typographically garbled form of "78 Messegelände" (the "auml" being the HTML entity-name for the character " ä "). HTH. Cheers, -- tlvp -- Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Horace Algiers <horace@horacealgiers.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-24 15:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ns66e1$1ann$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #34707 |
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 01:35:03 -0400, tlvp wrote: > No idea. But "Messegel auml nde" is almost certainly a typographically > garbled form of "78 Messegelände" (the "auml" being the HTML entity-name > for the character " ä "). HTH. Cheers, -- tlvp Thanks. I think we've mostly agreed that the SMS was up to no good, and that there are places to forward such SMS texts, and that there are places which will unravel and reveal the URL without compromising our security. Thanks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-24 18:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <148ibyxvclt9$.af4bxg9674ow$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #34723 |
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 15:34:25 +0000 (UTC), Horace Algiers wrote: > On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 01:35:03 -0400, tlvp wrote: > >> No idea. But "Messegel auml nde" is almost certainly a typographically >> garbled form of "78 Messegel㭤e" (the "auml" being the HTML entity-name >> for the character " ➢). HTH. Cheers, -- tlvp > > Thanks. I think we've mostly agreed that the SMS was up to no good, and > that there are places to forward such SMS texts, and that there are places > which will unravel and reveal the URL without compromising our security. > > Thanks. Oops ... you don't do Unicode very well, do you :-) ? Cheers, -- tlvp -- Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-23 00:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1exxvxx0v4py2$.1vaegndrzrt6a$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #34626 |
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 03:19:51 -0000 (UTC), Horace Algiers wrote: > ... > But looking at your scam advisor site, there is a ton of conflicting info: > http://www.scamadviser.com/is-rbusv.com-a-fake-site.html > > For example, the WHOIS implicates Las Vegas and CN but the *addresses* in > China are oddly European: > Admin Name: Helmut Kohl > Admin Organization: Helmut Kohl You *do* know who Helmut Kohl is/was, don't you? (Forerunner to Angela Merkel.) Dead giveaway this site is *not* on the up-and-up! Cheers, -- tlvp -- Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web