Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #21118 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-22 10:06 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-07-23 08:39 +1000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 353 — 49 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-22 10:06 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 10:23 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 08:56 +1000
anonymous sims in EU (was: Who pays for a phone..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-07-23 20:21 +0200
Re: anonymous sims in EU tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-03 20:04 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 03:22 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 10:27 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-22 17:00 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 13:26 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 10:00 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 14:22 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-07-22 10:07 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-22 20:06 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? DevilsPGD <boogabooga@crazyhat.net> - 2015-07-22 13:13 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 09:08 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Chris Blunt <mail@nospam.com> - 2015-07-24 11:22 +0800
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 14:36 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:12 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-25 19:34 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 16:58 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 17:51 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 09:57 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-24 14:32 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Wolfgang Barth <barthwo@spamfence.net> - 2015-07-24 15:38 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-07-24 09:26 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:22 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-07-25 11:19 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:17 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-07-25 11:18 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-25 19:47 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-27 09:46 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 03:50 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 06:59 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-04 16:21 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 08:52 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 05:30 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-04 19:33 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-06 09:39 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 12:17 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 05:41 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-04 17:25 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 05:26 +1000
voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-05 20:08 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-05 14:58 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-05 15:16 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 12:41 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-05 16:03 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 06:24 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 13:34 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 04:51 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-10-21 19:45 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 09:17 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-10-24 17:49 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 13:40 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "NotMe" <me@privacy.net> - 2015-10-24 19:03 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-25 09:52 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 22:28 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Walter Briscoe <wbriscoe@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2015-10-25 08:17 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 10:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-10-25 18:50 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-25 18:00 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 10:16 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-26 07:24 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 10:13 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-27 07:09 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 20:03 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-27 18:33 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "NotMe" <me@privacy.net> - 2015-10-26 08:07 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-10-25 14:58 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "NotMe" <me@privacy.net> - 2015-10-25 17:10 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-10-26 10:08 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 10:09 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-26 07:27 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 10:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-27 07:11 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 20:09 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Walter Briscoe <wbriscoe@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2015-10-26 21:24 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 23:18 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 13:22 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 13:41 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 14:53 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-06 15:35 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 23:26 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-06 16:35 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 09:46 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 14:40 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-07 06:02 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-08 01:09 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 14:04 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas DevilsPGD <boogabooga@crazyhat.net> - 2015-08-09 00:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-08-09 12:42 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2015-08-10 00:18 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-08-09 17:50 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-09 23:19 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-09 23:10 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 08:43 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 13:40 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-11 00:21 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 06:57 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-11 09:57 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:20 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-12 11:21 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-12 19:50 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-12 16:21 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-13 12:08 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-13 09:58 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-13 17:04 +0200
security concept "rule of least priviledge" (was: voting booths in repu areas) Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-17 16:42 -0400
Re: security concept "rule of least priviledge" (was: voting booths in repu areas) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-18 10:08 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 06:26 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-13 09:38 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-13 17:14 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-13 11:42 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-13 18:47 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-13 14:22 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 07:00 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-14 11:34 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 06:53 +0700
what's entrapment (was: voting booths in republican areas) Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-15 14:13 +0000
Re: what's entrapment (was: voting booths in republican areas) John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:20 +0700
Re: what's entrapment Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-18 22:06 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 06:43 +0700
prosecutors do not care about guilt (was: voting booths in republican areas) Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-15 13:42 +0000
Re: prosecutors do not care about guilt (was: voting booths in republican areas) John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:08 +0700
Re: prosecutors do not care about guilt (was: voting booths in republican areas) Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-16 17:14 +0200
Re: prosecutors do not care about guilt Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-17 22:57 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-12 13:07 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-08-12 18:31 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-12 22:44 -0400
why disclose personal info (was: voting booths in republican areas) Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-15 13:20 +0000
Re: why disclose personal info David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-08-15 15:12 +0100
Re: why disclose personal info Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-08-15 15:08 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:26 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:23 -0700
accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-15 09:50 -0400
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) lew <citrustwosac@google.mailer.company.invalid> - 2015-08-15 16:36 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 10:55 -0700
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-15 14:44 -0500
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 19:34 -0700
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:54 +0700
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-18 11:02 +1000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-22 12:55 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-22 19:08 +0200
security vs. manners (was: accommodating unreasonable searches..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-24 00:48 +0200
Re: security vs. manners Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-24 14:18 -0400
Re: security vs. manners The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:59 -0700
Re: security vs. manners Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-25 13:40 +0200
Re: security vs. manners Travis Bickle <3S96@taxi.net> - 2015-08-25 12:31 -0400
Re: security vs. manners lew <citrustwosac@google.mailer.company.invalid> - 2015-08-25 16:38 +0000
Re: security vs. manners "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-26 09:29 -0400
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 10:19 -0400
Re: security vs. manners "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-26 11:45 -0400
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 13:53 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-26 14:39 -0500
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 16:56 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-26 16:08 -0500
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:33 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-26 17:32 -0500
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 19:51 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-26 18:59 -0500
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-27 08:42 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-27 09:24 -0500
Re: security vs. manners tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-26 22:52 -0400
Re: security vs. manners The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 09:57 -0700
Re: security vs. manners Bob Henson <rh547477@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 15:36 +0100
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-25 21:04 -0400
Re: security vs. manners tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-26 03:25 -0400
Re: security vs. manners "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-26 09:26 -0400
Re: security vs. manners The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 12:18 -0700
Re: security vs. manners (was: accommodating unreasonable searches..) TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-25 08:36 -0400
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2015-08-16 23:19 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) "Stuart McCall" <smccall@myunrealbox.com> - 2015-08-17 18:08 +0100
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-17 17:22 -0400
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2015-08-17 23:15 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) "Stuart McCall" <smccall@myunrealbox.com> - 2015-08-18 17:11 +0100
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2015-08-18 23:03 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) Joe Makowiec <makowiec@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-19 13:53 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 06:49 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-06 17:25 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 19:51 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 19:31 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 21:56 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-06 20:51 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-06 21:48 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 19:29 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-07 15:40 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-07 00:08 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-07 21:08 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-08 01:04 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 13:58 +1000
do absentee voters need photo id? (was: voting booths in republican areas) Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-08 14:03 +0200
Re: do absentee voters need photo id? (was: voting booths in republican areas) Elias <elias@nowherenohow.com> - 2015-08-08 10:02 -0500
Re: do absentee voters need photo id? (was: voting booths in republican areas) Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-08 21:28 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-06 15:23 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas News <News@Group.Post> - 2015-08-06 07:00 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 04:59 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:33 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-06 15:34 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 18:50 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 16:55 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 09:12 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 08:40 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-06 07:26 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 12:16 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 13:24 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 12:16 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 13:22 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-06 07:35 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-08-06 14:36 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 12:18 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 13:31 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:46 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 14:04 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 12:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 14:27 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:44 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 13:58 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 12:12 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:36 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-10 20:05 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 06:18 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-05 15:27 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 13:38 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 15:25 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-05 15:19 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 09:07 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 08:38 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-06 07:25 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 11:11 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-06 07:31 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 12:02 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 11:14 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:38 -0700
leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-07 14:58 +0200
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-07 10:56 -0400
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 05:16 +1000
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-25 22:45 +0200
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-26 09:24 -0400
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-27 13:47 +0000
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-27 10:20 -0400
q) campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? a) education Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-09-03 08:44 +0000
comp.mobile.android "The Sorceress of Qar" <sorceress@qar.qanar.com> - 2015-08-27 09:23 -0500
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-27 13:01 -0400
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201509.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-09-06 00:12 +0200
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-08 16:21 -0700
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-22 23:11 +0200
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 20:54 -0700
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-08-22 23:40 -0500
Bev's reverse logic (was: leader's campaigns..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-09-03 09:22 +0200
Re: Bev's reverse logic David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-09-03 08:44 +0100
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-23 08:49 -0400
small campaign donations (was: leader's campaigns..) Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-31 16:06 -0400
leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-12 04:08 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> - 2015-08-05 18:13 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 16:02 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Mike Yetto <unet.lighthouse@xoxy.net> - 2015-08-06 18:27 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> - 2015-08-07 12:36 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-07 12:38 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-10 08:51 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-10 22:28 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-11 08:53 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-11 01:06 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-11 10:25 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-11 17:46 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-12 09:54 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-05 19:00 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> - 2015-08-07 12:39 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-08-06 16:14 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 09:07 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-18 09:49 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 11:46 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-18 12:38 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 18:51 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-19 11:14 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 08:31 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-19 12:56 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 11:57 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-19 15:04 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 12:22 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-19 15:36 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 06:09 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 13:10 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:03 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 12:39 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Joe Makowiec <makowiec@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-19 20:09 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 14:27 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 14:58 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 16:10 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-20 08:32 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:14 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-24 08:33 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-24 09:37 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 15:27 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:13 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-19 16:34 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 14:46 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-20 12:40 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-20 09:55 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-20 10:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-20 22:35 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:09 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:02 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-19 00:03 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 19:01 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2015-08-19 19:08 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 09:34 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-18 23:57 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 19:05 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 09:28 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2015-08-19 19:14 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-19 09:09 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 07:15 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 05:56 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 05:52 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 13:15 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas David Solimano <david@solimano.org> - 2015-08-06 22:52 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 21:59 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 20:26 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 14:03 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:11 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 05:34 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-25 20:04 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Dieghettino <d@casa.mia> - 2015-07-26 06:41 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 08:45 +1000
non-EU travellers must carry passports (was: Who pays..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-01 20:26 +0200
Re: non-EU travellers must carry passports cl@isbd.net - 2015-08-01 21:33 +0100
Re: non-EU travellers must carry passports tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-03 23:11 -0400
Re: non-EU travellers must carry passports cl@isbd.net - 2015-08-04 14:25 +0100
Re: non-EU travellers must carry passports Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-05 18:56 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 04:05 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 07:03 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 14:11 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-04 11:19 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 12:19 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 12:32 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-04 15:40 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 14:15 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 05:36 +1000
id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-05 20:05 +0000
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 13:19 -0700
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 04:46 -0400
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 09:10 -0400
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 14:51 -0400
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 14:58 -0400
id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-08 08:48 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-26 18:45 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 10:04 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-27 09:51 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-28 09:30 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 20:24 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-25 19:57 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 16:57 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 08:39 +1000
Page 3 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 18 Next page →
| From | Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 17:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <040820151725147915%leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> |
| In reply to | #21673 |
In article <mpr30g$aqb$1@dont-email.me>, The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: > If you're not smart enough to figure out how to obtain the proper > documentation, perhaps you aren't smart enough to even think about > voting. Some say that even the hopelessly stupid deserve > representation, but I think they already have it. Blasphemy! But I agree. leo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 05:26 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <d2chusFfhhnU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #21662 |
"Michael Eyd" <invalid@eyd.de> wrote in message news:mpqhon$5fj$1@news.sap-ag.de... > Am 04.08.2015 um 15:59 schrieb Savageduck: > >> ...and which State do you live in that photo ID is required at a polling >> place? > In the US you're not required to prove that you're the one your claiming > to be at a polling place? Doesn’t happen in Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand etc either. > Sounds strange to me... Your problem. > Over here in Germany the rule is rather simple: If you can't prove that > you're the one who's listed on the voters registration card (like a postal > card), you won't get anywhere near the ballot box. You lot have always been much more into that sort of stuff than the english speaking world. > And the usual way for this identification is by means of the ID card, > which always is a photo ID.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 20:08 +0200 |
| Subject | voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) |
| Message-ID | <448fcd2fbde463f54a667ea9a3b0f02b@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #21662 |
> Am 04.08.2015 um 15:59 schrieb Savageduck: > > > ...and which State do you live in that photo ID is required at a > > polling place? > > In the US you're not required to prove that you're the one your > claiming to be at a polling place? Sounds strange to me... It varies from one region to the next. Republican voters are die-hard voters. So if a voting booth is in a republican stronghold, the standard of identity proof is much higher. Republicans are largely disciplined on this while democrats are not. So increasing restrictions and voting difficulty always reduces number of democratic votes. Democrats have less wealth as a whole, and naturally a disproportionate higher number of democrats don't have passports or driver licenses. It's a republican political strategy, similar to large billboards during campaign times saying "voting fraud is a crime.. will be strictly enforced!" Of course everyone knows that, but the strategy is actually to frighten legit voters into not taking any risk (like those who may not have a driver license or passport, or those who recently moved into the area, who might be uncertain whether they were automatically deregistered from the previous area, etc).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 14:58 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) |
| Message-ID | <mptma8$feh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21694 |
"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message news:448fcd2fbde463f54a667ea9a3b0f02b@dizum.com... >> Am 04.08.2015 um 15:59 schrieb Savageduck: >> >> > ...and which State do you live in that photo ID is required at a >> > polling place? >> >> In the US you're not required to prove that you're the one your >> claiming to be at a polling place? Sounds strange to me... > > It varies from one region to the next. Republican voters are die-hard > voters. So if a voting booth is in a republican stronghold, the > standard of identity proof is much higher. Republicans are largely > disciplined on this while democrats are not. So increasing > restrictions and voting difficulty always reduces number of democratic > votes. Democrats have less wealth as a whole, and naturally a > disproportionate higher number of democrats don't have passports or > driver licenses. > > It's a republican political strategy, similar to large billboards > during campaign times saying "voting fraud is a crime.. will be > strictly enforced!" Of course everyone knows that, but the strategy > is actually to frighten legit voters into not taking any risk (like > those who may not have a driver license or passport, or those who > recently moved into the area, who might be uncertain whether they were > automatically deregistered from the previous area, etc). Can you cite anything that proves your claim that Democrats have less wealth than Republicans? Two of the largest blue states are California and New York. There is far more democratic wealth in those states than Republican. Where do you get your information that polling places in Republican strongholds require a higher standard of proof of identity? The standard of identity is the same across an entire state, it does not differ from one area of a state to another. In New York, we walk into or polling place, say who we are, then the poll worker looks up our name on the list and we sign our name. If I know the name and address of someone else, I can easily claim to be that person and vote fraudulently. Democrats don't support voter ID for one simple reason - they have no interest in prohibiting voter fraud because they benefit from it. How does requiring voter ID scare off voters? How difficult is it to obtain an ID? You don't need a driver's license, you can get a state issued ID card. This notion that requiring voter ID is a political strategy and that the purpose is to scare off voters is pure bunk.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 15:16 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) |
| Message-ID | <050820151516156956%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #21695 |
In article <mptma8$feh$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote: > Where do you get your information that polling places in Republican > strongholds require a higher standard of proof of identity? The > standard of identity is the same across an entire state, it does not > differ from one area of a state to another. In New York, we walk into > or polling place, say who we are, then the poll worker looks up our name > on the list and we sign our name. If I know the name and address of > someone else, I can easily claim to be that person and vote > fraudulently. vote early and vote often! > Democrats don't support voter ID for one simple reason - they have no > interest in prohibiting voter fraud because they benefit from it. nonsense. *all* politicians can benefit from voter fraud (or any other type of illicit activity) if they think they can get away with it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 12:41 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) |
| Message-ID | <050820151241371909%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #21695 |
In article <mptma8$feh$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote: > Democrats don't support voter ID for one simple reason - they have no > interest in prohibiting voter fraud because they benefit from it. Bullshit! Study after study shows that voter ID fraud is virtually nonexistent. Republicans want strict voter ID laws because the poor and minorities are less likely to have photo ID, and the poor and minorities are more likely to vote Democratic. > This notion that requiring voter ID is a political strategy and > that the purpose is to scare off voters is pure bunk. It is a political strategy designed to reduce the number of poor and minority voters. It is a "cure" for a virtually nonexistent problem.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 16:03 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) |
| Message-ID | <mptq35$v7f$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21697 |
"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message news:050820151241371909%michelle@michelle.org... > In article <mptma8$feh$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> > wrote: > >> Democrats don't support voter ID for one simple reason - they have no >> interest in prohibiting voter fraud because they benefit from it. > > Bullshit! Study after study shows that voter ID fraud is virtually > nonexistent. Republicans want strict voter ID laws because the poor > and minorities are less likely to have photo ID, and the poor and > minorities are more likely to vote Democratic. How hard is it for a poor person or a minority person to get a photo ID? If they're poor and on public assistance then they need ID to get that. This is such a BS argument you make, you're regurgitating party talking points. >> This notion that requiring voter ID is a political strategy and >> that the purpose is to scare off voters is pure bunk. > > It is a political strategy designed to reduce the number of poor and > minority voters. It is a "cure" for a virtually nonexistent problem.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 06:24 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) |
| Message-ID | <d2fa3vF65koU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #21698 |
"PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote in message news:mptq35$v7f$1@dont-email.me... > "Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message > news:050820151241371909%michelle@michelle.org... >> In article <mptma8$feh$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Democrats don't support voter ID for one simple reason - they have no >>> interest in prohibiting voter fraud because they benefit from it. >> >> Bullshit! Study after study shows that voter ID fraud is virtually >> nonexistent. Republicans want strict voter ID laws because the poor >> and minorities are less likely to have photo ID, and the poor and >> minorities are more likely to vote Democratic. > How hard is it for a poor person or a minority person to get a photo ID? Its not that hard, but when you don't have a car or any easy way to get around, and you don't need a photo ID for any other reason because you are too poor to fly etc, why would you bother ? It makes it impossible for those who encourage people to vote on voting day by taking to where they vote and bringing them home to get those who don't have photo ID to vote because there is no way to organise a photo ID on the day as well. > If they're poor and on public assistance then they need ID to get that. There are plenty who aren't that don't need ID. > This is such a BS argument you make, Nope, its certainly true that the dregs of society are much less likely to have a photo ID, because they are less likely to have a drivers license etc because of the cost of the car. > you're regurgitating party talking points. She is stating the obvious that you are denying., >>> This notion that requiring voter ID is a political strategy and >>> that the purpose is to scare off voters is pure bunk. >> >> It is a political strategy designed to reduce the number of poor and >> minority voters. It is a "cure" for a virtually nonexistent problem. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 13:34 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) |
| Message-ID | <050820151334372709%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #21698 |
In article <mptq35$v7f$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote: > > Bullshit! Study after study shows that voter ID fraud is virtually > > nonexistent. Republicans want strict voter ID laws because the poor > > and minorities are less likely to have photo ID, and the poor and > > minorities are more likely to vote Democratic. > > How hard is it for a poor person or a minority person to get a photo ID? It can be very hard, especially if they are old. <http://www.brennancenter.org/publication/challenge-obtaining-voter-iden tification> <http://www.aarp.org/politics-society/government-elections/info-01-2012/ voter-id-laws-impact-older-americans.html> <http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/03/how-voter-id-laws-a re-being-used-to-disenfranchise-minorities-and-the-poor/254572/> > If they're poor and on public assistance then they need ID to get that. No they don't. Furthermore, as i said, the voter ID fraud myth is just that, a myth. Here are just a few articles that debunk that myth: <https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/voter-fraud> <http://mediamatters.org/research/2014/10/30/debunking-the-conservative- medias-2014-voter-fr/201382> <http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2014/07/09/7-papers-4-go vernment-inquiries-2-news-investigations-and-1-court-ruling-proving-vote r-fraud-is-mostly-a-myth/> <http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/11/upshot/vote-fraud-is-rare-but-myth-is- widespread.html?_r=0&abt=0002&abg=0> <http://www.scholarsstrategynetwork.org/content/misleading-myth-voter-fr aud-american-elections> <http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2012/04/24/the-myth-of-voter-fra ud> <http://www.forbes.com/sites/johnwasik/2012/11/06/voter-fraud-a-massive- anti-democratic-deception/> <http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 04:51 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <q6woonawfkq6$.iazhj7hxn6zw.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #21698 |
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 16:03:17 -0400, PAS wrote: > If they're poor and on public assistance ... How many poor are actually eligible for public assistance? -- tlvp -- Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-21 19:45 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <305876d83f245b1582fd3d2693d86a6b@remailer.paranoici.org> |
| In reply to | #21698 |
> How hard is it for a poor person or a minority person to get a photo ID? > If they're poor and on public assistance then they need ID to get that. In Alabama approaches the elections, it will soon be quite difficult: https://secure2.convio.net/comcau/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=961
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 09:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <n0dmer$97c$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #23208 |
On 10/21/2015 12:45 PM, Anonymous wrote: >> How hard is it for a poor person or a minority person to get a photo ID? >> If they're poor and on public assistance then they need ID to get that. > > In Alabama approaches the elections, it will soon be quite difficult: > > https://secure2.convio.net/comcau/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=961 How many IDs (not DLs) were processed by those offices last year? -- Cheers, Bev ---------------------------------------------------------- A spokesperson for 60s band 'the animals' has today made a public apology saying they were mistaken and there isn't a house in New Orleans after all.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-24 17:49 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <14a5fc13f70b3d68a0011647711e0071@remailer.paranoici.org> |
| In reply to | #23221 |
> > In Alabama approaches the elections, it will soon be quite difficult: > > > > https://secure2.convio.net/comcau/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=961 > > How many IDs (not DLs) were processed by those offices last year? Last year was only a midterm election year.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-24 13:40 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <n0gq75$4ru$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #23224 |
On 10/24/2015 10:49 AM, Anonymous wrote: >> > In Alabama approaches the elections, it will soon be quite difficult: >> > >> > https://secure2.convio.net/comcau/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=961 >> >> How many IDs (not DLs) were processed by those offices last year? > > Last year was only a midterm election year. OK, the year before... How many people does this REALLY prevent from voting, as opposed to the number of illegals who are improperly allowed/encouraged to vote? -- Cheers, Bev ======================================================================= "Lord, grant me the serenity to accept the things that I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to hide the bodies of the people who pissed me off."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "NotMe" <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-24 19:03 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <n0h76s$j6f$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #23225 |
"The Real Bev" <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote in message news:n0gq75$4ru$2@dont-email.me... > On 10/24/2015 10:49 AM, Anonymous wrote: >>> > In Alabama approaches the elections, it will soon be quite difficult: >>> > >>> > https://secure2.convio.net/comcau/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=961 >>> >>> How many IDs (not DLs) were processed by those offices last year? >> >> Last year was only a midterm election year. > > OK, the year before... > > How many people does this REALLY prevent from voting, as opposed to the > number of illegals who are improperly allowed/encouraged to vote? > Depending on the data source (they all charge for access) in Texas alone it's between 600K and 750K. By the same measure the Texas AG in responce to a direct court order was unable to cite one instance where a photo ID would have prevented a fraudulent vote. No too long ago there was a case where a son tried to vote in place of his father (photo ID would not have helped due to family familiarity) the thing that tripped up the attempt was very old technology ...the signatures did not match.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 09:52 +0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <krgo2bddgj77dp83mndak0qjiia9dqp93r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #23225 |
On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:40:07 -0700, The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >On 10/24/2015 10:49 AM, Anonymous wrote: >>> > In Alabama approaches the elections, it will soon be quite difficult: >>> > >>> > https://secure2.convio.net/comcau/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=961 >>> >>> How many IDs (not DLs) were processed by those offices last year? >> >> Last year was only a midterm election year. > >OK, the year before... > >How many people does this REALLY prevent from voting, as opposed to the >number of illegals who are improperly allowed/encouraged to vote? Out of curiosity, if a "photo ID" is a requirement what do people that don't drive do? -- cheers, John B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-24 22:28 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <n0hp61$qum$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #23227 |
On 10/24/2015 07:52 PM, John B. wrote: > On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:40:07 -0700, The Real Bev > <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On 10/24/2015 10:49 AM, Anonymous wrote: >>>> > In Alabama approaches the elections, it will soon be quite difficult: >>>> > >>>> > https://secure2.convio.net/comcau/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=961 >>>> >>>> How many IDs (not DLs) were processed by those offices last year? >>> >>> Last year was only a midterm election year. >> >>OK, the year before... >> >>How many people does this REALLY prevent from voting, as opposed to the >>number of illegals who are improperly allowed/encouraged to vote? > > Out of curiosity, if a "photo ID" is a requirement what do people that > don't drive do? In California you can convert your DL to a photo ID if you don't drive any more. If you don't have a DL you can just produce a birth cetificate and get a photo ID that looks like a DL but isn't at no cost. Apparently you can now produce a Mexican birth certificate and get a DL. Not good. How many people who were born in the US can NOT get a copy of their birth certificates? I'd be willing to bet that local political party organizations will be happy to help out here. I can't remember what I had to do to register to vote. Maybe just fill in a form and mail it in. I'd be in favor of requiring a birth certificate to do that. -- Cheers, Bev --------------------------------------------------------- "I don't think they could put him in a mental hospital. On the other hand, if he were already in, I don't think they'd let him out." -- Greek Geek
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Walter Briscoe <wbriscoe@nospam.demon.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 08:17 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <MeIxdYT0AJLWFwqI@freenetname.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #23228 |
In message <n0hp61$qum$1@dont-email.me> of Sat, 24 Oct 2015 22:28:34 in comp.mobile.android, The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> writes >On 10/24/2015 07:52 PM, John B. wrote: >> On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:40:07 -0700, The Real Bev >> <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>On 10/24/2015 10:49 AM, Anonymous wrote: >>>>> > In Alabama approaches the elections, it will soon be quite difficult: >>>>> > >>>>> > https://secure2.convio.net/comcau/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page >>>>> >=UserAction&id=961 >>>>> >>>>> How many IDs (not DLs) were processed by those offices last year? >>>> >>>> Last year was only a midterm election year. >>> >>>OK, the year before... >>> >>>How many people does this REALLY prevent from voting, as opposed to the >>>number of illegals who are improperly allowed/encouraged to vote? >> >> Out of curiosity, if a "photo ID" is a requirement what do people that >> don't drive do? > >In California you can convert your DL to a photo ID if you don't drive >any more. If you don't have a DL you can just produce a birth >cetificate and get a photo ID that looks like a DL but isn't at no >cost. Apparently you can now produce a Mexican birth certificate and >get a DL. Not good. > >How many people who were born in the US can NOT get a copy of their >birth certificates? I'd be willing to bet that local political party >organizations will be happy to help out here. > >I can't remember what I had to do to register to vote. Maybe just fill >in a form and mail it in. I'd be in favor of requiring a birth >certificate to do that. > > WTF is this to do with comp.mobile.android? "Apparently ..." suggests an urban myth. Please cite good evidence. I used to have a California DL after passing a Drivers' Test. I was unable to renew it, when changed rules required me to quote a Social Security number. (I don't have and don't want one ;) -- Walter Briscoe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 10:14 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <n0j2ij$e1k$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #23229 |
On 10/25/2015 01:17 AM, Walter Briscoe wrote: > In message <n0hp61$qum$1@dont-email.me> of Sat, 24 Oct 2015 22:28:34 in > comp.mobile.android, The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> writes >>On 10/24/2015 07:52 PM, John B. wrote: >>> >>> Out of curiosity, if a "photo ID" is a requirement what do people that >>> don't drive do? >> >>In California you can convert your DL to a photo ID if you don't drive >>any more. If you don't have a DL you can just produce a birth >>cetificate and get a photo ID that looks like a DL but isn't at no >>cost. Apparently you can now produce a Mexican birth certificate and >>get a DL. Not good. >> >>How many people who were born in the US can NOT get a copy of their >>birth certificates? I'd be willing to bet that local political party >>organizations will be happy to help out here. >> >>I can't remember what I had to do to register to vote. Maybe just fill >>in a form and mail it in. I'd be in favor of requiring a birth >>certificate to do that. > > WTF is this to do with comp.mobile.android? Nothing at all. Thread drift. New in town, stranger? > "Apparently ..." suggests an urban myth. Please cite good evidence. Articles about Brown just signing into law automatic voter registration when you get your driver's license -- you may have to opt out if you claim you're not eligible. Not clear. Previous law that allows illegals to get drivers' licenses so they can get liability insurance etc. Not interested in doing more research. > I used to have a California DL after passing a Drivers' Test. > I was unable to renew it, when changed rules required me to quote a > Social Security number. (I don't have and don't want one ;) There are always choices to be made and prices to be paid, right? -- Cheers, Bev "When I was a kid my dad once joked that the best way to prevent being on a plane with someone carrying a bomb would be to bring your own bomb and not detonate it. Sounded convincing. What are the odds that two people board, each with a bomb?" -- Rowdy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bert <bert@iphouse.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 18:50 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <XnsA53EC00D995F7VeebleFetzer@127.0.0.1> |
| In reply to | #23237 |
In news:n0j2ij$e1k$1@dont-email.me The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: > On 10/25/2015 01:17 AM, Walter Briscoe wrote: > >> >> WTF is this to do with comp.mobile.android? > > Nothing at all. Thread drift. New in town, stranger? That's what killfiles are for. Killfiles are forever. -- bert@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 18 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web