Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #145025
| From | Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: What is your experience with Samsung "RAM Plus" virtual memory expansion? |
| Date | 2024-12-07 13:14 +0000 |
| Organization | NOYB |
| Message-ID | <vj1l7i.1to.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <virg1h$eif$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <viu7ob$26lh3$1@dont-email.me> <lrfpj4F77p6U1@mid.individual.net> <vius10.17o.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <lriun1Fmn2pU3@mid.individual.net> |
Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> wrote: > Frank Slootweg, 2024-12-06 12:51: > > > Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote: > >> Edward.C wrote: > >> > >>> I think it depends on your usage. If you always have many apps running > >>> at the same time, maybe it can give slight improvement in performance. > >>> > >>> I have disabled it and never noticed any difference, probably because I > >>> have 12GB of RAM on my A55. > >> > >> Given the way Android apps save their state and are then ready to be > >> killed when there is pressure on memory, ready to be reloaded "as they > >> were", then using swap seems a bit pointless? > > > > Yes, but not all apps can be killed and reloaded/restarted "as they > > were". For example those which depend on external data or/and state. For > > those apps, you want them to be swapped instead of killed. > > By definition an app *must* support the fact, that it can be killed at > any time. Even rotating the display will kill and restart the current > running activity. That's the reason, why dialog boxes should not be used > but UI fragments instead since the state of fragments will be handled by > the OS instead of the app. > > But on the other hand it depends on the app developers how good the > implement state changes. My/the point is that not all apps *can* be designed that way. It might be that *if* they can be designed that way, they *must* be designed that way. But an app developer can not be required to do the impossible. Note that I specifically mentioned external data or/and state. If an app is killed, external data or/and state might/will be lost and the app *cannot* recover when restarted. Examples of such apps are apps which depend on data from (internal or external sensors or other data sources). Also note I mentioned in the part you snipped, if all apps/programs could be designed that way, we wouldn't have paging/swapping on real computers, but we do. Guess why that is?
Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What is your experience with Samsung "RAM Plus" virtual memory expansion? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-05 06:08 +0000
Re: What is your experience with Samsung "RAM Plus" virtual memory expansion? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-05 10:26 +0000
Re: What is your experience with Samsung "RAM Plus" virtual memory expansion? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-12-05 22:57 +0100
Re: What is your experience with Samsung "RAM Plus" virtual memory expansion? "Edward.C" <ec@spam.invalid> - 2024-12-06 13:40 +0800
Re: What is your experience with Samsung "RAM Plus" virtual memory expansion? "Edward.C" <ec@spam.invalid> - 2024-12-06 15:04 +0800
Re: What is your experience with Samsung "RAM Plus" virtual memory expansion? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-06 08:05 +0000
Re: What is your experience with Samsung "RAM Plus" virtual memory expansion? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-12-06 09:55 +0100
Re: What is your experience with Samsung "RAM Plus" virtual memory expansion? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-12-06 11:51 +0000
Re: What is your experience with Samsung "RAM Plus" virtual memory expansion? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-06 14:02 +0100
Re: What is your experience with Samsung "RAM Plus" virtual memory expansion? Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-06 21:21 +0000
Re: What is your experience with Samsung "RAM Plus" virtual memory expansion? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-12-07 13:51 +0100
Re: What is your experience with Samsung "RAM Plus" virtual memory expansion? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-12-07 13:14 +0000
Re: What is your experience with Samsung "RAM Plus" virtual memory expansion? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-07 14:05 +0000
Re: What is your experience with Samsung "RAM Plus" virtual memory expansion? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-12-07 16:18 +0000
Re: What is your experience with Samsung "RAM Plus" virtual memory expansion? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-12-09 00:50 +0100
Re: What is your experience with Samsung "RAM Plus" virtual memory expansion? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-12-09 00:46 +0100
Re: What is your experience with Samsung "RAM Plus" virtual memory expansion? Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2024-12-06 11:52 +0000
csiph-web