Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #59567
| From | Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: use of the plus sign |
| Date | 2019-02-02 18:04 +0000 |
| Organization | NOYB |
| Message-ID | <q34pj2.bps.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <x9-dnbJcIN_JvsnBnZ2dnUU78WXNnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <72662561-2c3c-dc81-5b61-4622b13b7eff@telia.com> <_cednSq1a4AIrsnBnZ2dnUU78TfNnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <q31s3j.cg8.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <q33qf6$i66$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Piet <www.godfatherof.nl/@opt-in.invalid> wrote: > Frank Slootweg wrote: > > NY wrote: > >> Lars Enderin wrote: > >>> NY wrote: > >>>> I wonder if there are any other countries which start all their national > >>>> area codes with a digit which *must* be dialled for calls within that > >>>> country and which *must not* be dialled for calls from outside that > >>>> country. > >>> > >>> Swedish area codes start with a zero inside Sweden. > >> > >> What advice is given to Swedish people about quoting phone numbers so they > >> can be dialled both from within and outside Sweden? Do they put the 0 in > >> brackets or do they list two formats of the number? I'm interested whether > >> they solve the problem in the same way as the UK does. > > > > Same problem and same solution (0 in brackets) in The Netherlands. > > Which problem? The notation +31 (0)10 1234567 is ITU-approved: > https://www.itu.int/rec/dologin_pub.asp?lang=e&id=T-REC-E.123-200102-I!!PDF-E&type=items > (items 7.1, 7.2) > https://www.itu.int/rec/dologin_pub.asp?lang=e&id=T-REC-E.123-200102-I!!PDF-S&type=items > for Carlos ;-) The point isn't that it isn't approved/standardized/<whatever>. The point is that it is confusing/error-prone/ambiguous/irritating/<whatever>. OTOH, I initially planned to put scare quotes around "problem" - i.e. 'problem' -, because for *me*, it's a non-problem. But as my gran said: "It's not all about you, Frank!" :-) [...]
Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
use of the plus sign micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2019-01-29 04:47 -0500
Re: use of the plus sign Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2019-01-29 10:05 +0000
Re: use of the plus sign Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2019-01-29 10:11 +0000
Re: use of the plus sign micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2019-01-29 06:55 -0500
Re: use of the plus sign "NY" <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-01 10:45 +0000
Re: use of the plus sign Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2019-02-01 12:07 +0100
Re: use of the plus sign "NY" <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-01 11:54 +0000
Re: use of the plus sign micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2019-02-01 10:17 -0500
Re: use of the plus sign Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-01 15:28 +0000
Re: use of the plus sign "NY" <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-01 16:58 +0000
Re: use of the plus sign Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2019-02-01 17:29 +0000
Re: use of the plus sign "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-01 18:53 +0100
Re: use of the plus sign "NY" <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-01 18:05 +0000
Re: use of the plus sign "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-01 19:59 +0100
Re: use of the plus sign Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-01 21:09 +0000
Re: use of the plus sign Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 22:08 +0000
Re: use of the plus sign micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2019-02-02 00:21 -0500
Re: use of the plus sign Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 09:23 +0000
Re: use of the plus sign "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-01 23:22 +0100
Re: use of the plus sign Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2019-02-02 19:27 +0000
Re: use of the plus sign Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 21:58 +0000
Re: use of the plus sign Piet <www.godfatherof.nl/@opt-in.invalid> - 2019-02-02 11:12 +0100
Re: use of the plus sign Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-02 18:04 +0000
Re: use of the plus sign Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2019-02-02 18:12 +0000
Re: use of the plus sign "NY" <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-02 19:52 +0000
Re: use of the plus sign nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-02 15:23 -0500
Re: use of the plus sign "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-01 14:00 +0100
Re: use of the plus sign "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-01-29 13:20 +0100
Re: use of the plus sign micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2019-01-30 07:51 -0500
Re: use of the plus sign Chris in Makati <mail@nospam.com> - 2019-01-29 13:54 +0000
Re: use of the plus sign Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2019-01-29 18:00 +0100
Re: use of the plus sign Ralph Fox <-rf-nz-@-.invalid> - 2019-02-02 07:34 +1300
csiph-web