Re: Call Recording

From	"s\|b" <me@privacy.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.mobile.android
Subject	Re: Call Recording
Date	2019-01-27 23:00 +0100
Organization	XXII
Message-ID	<gb6nviF38prU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<6Y13E.178018$pE1.105319@fx38.am4> <q2jj3q$5ei$1@dont-email.me> <gb65okFtp8kU1@mid.individual.net> <gb66ahFtp8kU2@mid.individual.net> <q2l4uu$gs8$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 21:39:58 +0100, Joerg Lorenz wrote:

> This is not correct for the whole of the EU. Without court order ist 
> cannot be used as evidence.

Based on this site:

<https://www.elfri.be/rechtspraak/gesprek-opnemen-als-bewijs-en-niet-als-chantagemiddel-toegelaten>

in Belgium, it can. The link states: 'recording a (phone) conversation
as evidence and not as a mean to blackmail, is allowed'.

> I can sue anybody tapping my phone without consent.

AFAIK 'tapping' is something else. It's recording phone conversation by
a person that is not taking part in the conversation.

> Guess why all 
> companies in the EU and the rest of Europe need written consent from 
> their work force if they want to or have to to record phone calls for 
> regulatory reasons.

Because the recording is done by a third party, one that is not part of
the conversation.

> Otherwise it would be severe breach of personal privacy.

I wouldn't know about that. You talk about a breach in personal privacy,
but the article says the conversation can be recorded because it is part
of the (recording) person's privacy as well.

I have no idea how this law holds up when the other party is living in
another country.

-- 
s|b

Thread

Call Recording Ian <ian@privacy.net> - 2019-01-26 18:48 +0000
  Re: Call Recording arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-26 20:48 +0000
    Re: Call Recording Boris <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 21:12 +0000
      Re: Call Recording arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-26 22:17 +0000
  Re: Call Recording Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2019-01-27 07:29 +0100
    Re: Call Recording VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2019-01-27 01:31 -0600
      Re: Call Recording Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2019-01-27 11:13 +0100
        Re: Call Recording Chris in Makati <mail@nospam.com> - 2019-01-27 15:04 +0000
          Re: Call Recording 123456789 <123456@123456.com> - 2019-01-27 09:09 -0700
          Re: Call Recording arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-28 01:49 +0000
        Re: Call Recording arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-28 01:49 +0000
      Re: Call Recording Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2019-01-27 11:16 +0100
        Re: Call Recording VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2019-01-27 20:03 -0600
          Re: Call Recording "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-01-28 03:54 +0100
            Re: Call Recording arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-28 03:53 +0000
      Re: Call Recording "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-01-27 14:36 +0100
        Re: Call Recording Piet <www.godfatherof.nl/@opt-in.invalid> - 2019-01-30 21:32 +0100
      Re: Call Recording nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-27 14:16 -0500
    Re: Call Recording John McGaw <Nobody@Nowh.ere> - 2019-01-27 11:11 -0500
    Re: Call Recording "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2019-01-27 17:49 +0100
      Re: Call Recording "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2019-01-27 17:58 +0100
        Re: Call Recording Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2019-01-27 21:39 +0100
          Re: Call Recording "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2019-01-27 23:00 +0100
      Re: Call Recording Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2019-01-27 21:32 +0100
        Re: Call Recording arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-28 01:48 +0000
    Re: Call Recording arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-28 01:49 +0000

csiph-web