Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.mobile.android > #34164

Re: I was impatient

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com>
Newsgroups comp.mobile.android
Subject Re: I was impatient
Date Tue, 13 Sep 2016 07:36:23 BST
Lines 11
Message-ID <e3pl37F60ctU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <e3p4a0F3291U1@mid.individual.net>
X-Trace individual.net 54fKv9E9dmHF4FXQP4txFg3Ck2S18p/XN/8viBvF+G/+mOQEi6
X-Orig-Path BERLIN : news.individual.net
Cancel-Lock sha1:OeHIIOaXpt7R3Driz/Y1YXPezus=
Xref csiph.com comp.mobile.android:34164

Show key headers only | View raw

in 34364 20160913 025131 "Percival P. Cassidy" <Nobody@NotMyISP.net> wrote:
>Not wanting to wait until my Nexus 5X got Android 7.0 in Google's own
>good time, I enrolled it in the beta program and got Android 7.0 (build
>NRD90M) within seconds. Fine so far. But today my wife's Nexus 5X, not
>enrolled in the beta program, got Android 7.0 (build NRD90R -- with
>September 5 security update), while mine is still on NRD90M -- with only
>the August 5 security update.)
>
>If your phone is enrolled in the beta program, which build do you have?

My experience is the same as yours.

Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

I was impatient "Percival P. Cassidy" <Nobody@NotMyISP.net> - 2016-09-12 21:51 -0400
  Re: I was impatient Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2016-09-13 07:36 +0100
  Re: I was impatient Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-09-13 11:01 +0100
    Re: I was impatient Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2016-09-14 08:11 +0100
      Re: I was impatient Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-09-15 10:22 +0100
        Re: I was impatient Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2016-09-16 07:22 +0100
          Re: I was impatient Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2016-09-16 07:29 +0100
            Re: I was impatient Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-09-16 07:55 +0100
          Re: I was impatient Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-09-16 07:49 +0100
    Re: I was impatient "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2016-09-15 19:45 +0200
      Re: I was impatient Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-09-15 19:20 +0100
        Re: I was impatient "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2016-09-15 22:01 +0200
  Re: I was impatient Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2016-09-13 13:49 +0000
    Re: I was impatient "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2016-09-13 17:15 +0200
      Re: I was impatient Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2016-09-13 17:39 +0000
        Re: I was impatient "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2016-09-13 21:07 +0200
    Re: I was impatient "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2016-09-14 17:14 +0200
      Re: I was impatient Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-09-15 10:17 +0100
        Re: I was impatient "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2016-09-15 19:40 +0200
  Re: I was impatient "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2016-09-13 16:02 +0200
  Re: I was impatient "Percival P. Cassidy" <Nobody@NotMyISP.net> - 2016-09-14 14:22 -0400
  I was impatient oxymaxsystems@gmail.com - 2016-12-12 14:19 -0800
    Re: I was impatient "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@invalid.es> - 2016-12-12 23:27 +0100
    Re: I was impatient Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2016-12-13 06:52 +0100

csiph-web