Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #21669
| Path | csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.szaf.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: IMEI alteration is not fraud |
| Date | 4 Aug 2015 18:11:00 GMT |
| Organization | NOYB |
| Lines | 21 |
| Message-ID | <d2cdhkFec25U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <1441f$55abc986$43da7656$24535@nntpswitch.blueworldhosting.com> <5oednaAF8sylJC3InZ2dnUU78KWdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <e087fbdda80eed256e1c3fc8f2481ebd@remailer.paranoici.org> <7ImdnXEk1PcFAinInZ2dnUU78TednZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <fnre8c-lni.ln1@esprimo.zbmc.eu> <yudezg0nsu6b.urfbmnqqmjir.dlg@40tude.net> <16r69c-f5e.ln1@esprimo.zbmc.eu> |
| X-Trace | individual.net ZZz7fl6peWREiOJTdr0cYwt+/aY/wsL58j3HZVGj8CL7zrInq3 |
| X-Orig-Path | not-for-mail |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:e7C1LA62QCsCjoCNi5MAbQVjcDE= |
| User-Agent | tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-6.2-WOW64/1.5.22(0.156/4/2) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2 |
| X-Antivirus | avast! (VPS 150803-1, 08/03/2015), Outbound message |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.mobile.android:21669 |
Show key headers only | View raw
cl@isbd.net wrote: > tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 12:09:03 +0100, cl@isbd.net wrote: > > > > > and what about a tablet (like the one I bought a couple of years > > > ago) that had no IMEI numbers for its two SIM cards? > > > > It's not SIM cards or tablets that need IMEI numbers, it's GSM telephones. > > And even a dual-SIM telephone needs only one IMEI. HTH. Cheers, -- tlvp > > My dual SIM phablet has an IMEI for each SIM. That's great! That means if one IMEI says the phone is stolen, you can still continue to use the other half-a-phone! But seriously, as tlvp says, a dual-SIM phone *needs* only one IMEI, but using 2 probably isn't a problem, as long as they identify the same unique phone. In any case, whatever you do, don't *change* either IMEI, or the nospam-police will be down on you like a ton of bricks!
Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: IMEI alteration is not fraud cl@isbd.net - 2015-07-26 12:09 +0100
Re: IMEI alteration is not fraud tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-03 23:35 -0400
Re: IMEI alteration is not fraud cl@isbd.net - 2015-08-04 14:26 +0100
Re: IMEI alteration is not fraud Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-08-04 18:11 +0000
csiph-web