Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #57038
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-10, microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.freeware |
| Subject | Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? |
| Date | 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <XnsA98E2B68EB5D9HT1@YMHc9WdP.R3Ec> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <pqijiq$4pg$1@news.mixmin.net> <pqiobd$1sm$1@dont-email.me> <pqivmu$mti$1@news.mixmin.net> <pqkpir.d3k.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <pqle6o$eoc$1@news.mixmin.net> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> news:pqle6o$eoc$1@news.mixmin.net Mon, 22 Oct 2018 21:07:37 GMT in comp.mobile.android, wrote: > On 22 Oct 2018 13:51:21 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote: > >> 1. 'Map network drive' and 'net use' can not handle FTP syntax, >> period. > > To be clear to all, Frank and I are in complete agreement on > _everything_ that Frank wrote in that post above. Frank wasn't the first to tell you that you cannot use UNC via FTP. I was, several weeks ago. > Specifically, after much experimentation, this morning, I gave up > on trying to mount Android FTP shares over WiFi as a "removable > drive" drive letter using only native Windows "net use" commands. Again, weeks ago, I already told you that you couldn't use it in the manner in which you were trying. > Ironically, as Frank astutely noted, "net use" works great with > WebDAV shares under the exact same conditions (even down to my > tests changing the ports and login credentials). Of course it does. It has since Windows XP, as I told you, previously. > I changed the login credentials and ports to match them as best I > could, and the results were astounding (to me). > > WebDAV works: > o net use X: \\192.168.1.7@8000\DCIM\Camera /user:francis francis Yep. > FTP fails: > o net use X: \\192.168.1.7@8000\DCIM\Camera /user:francis francis Yep. > Why? See below. > Hell if I know why. That's obvious. You know very little...In spite of your claims to the contrary. > Someone (like Rudy?) who understands Windows will have to explain > why. :) It's quite simple. FTP does NOT support UNC. UNC and FTP don't know each other. Never have, never will. FTP is an ancient by todays standards protocol; no changes are going to be made to it anytime soon to give you any UNC support. That's just not happening. So much code would have to be modified to allow for it, that you'd just wind up breaking a pile of ftp servers and clients. For no gain. Shame you wanted to be an immature little asshole towards me for weeks now. You could have been using drive letters, mounted to your internal/external memory (available or not, your choice) via your entire network, had you manned up for what you did, accepted responsibility for it, 0wned your fuckup as they say where I'm from. In the unlikely event you didn't already know, you've exceeded the amount of time I was willing to wait on that apology by a significant margin. Perhaps that's why you're slowing down on posts in that thread and appear to be giving up? Can't find anyone willing to show you how to do it, even for nothing more than to spite me? Pooh backed out when offered, I noticed. Nice of the idiot to suggest a symlink to you, wasn't it? How did that advice workout for you Arlen? Come to think of it, has any of his suggestions (I bet he laughed his fucking ass off reading your posts about libmtp) actually given you those 'DOS' friendly drive letters you've been asking for? You know that Windows NT doesn't have DOS though, right? What you're calling 'DOS' is an emulated console environment. With 64bit systems, 16bit native code emulation is no more. It can still be run on those systems, but a 3rd party app is required to play middleman. There's no IO.SYS/MSDOS.SYS, ibm.com, etc etc etc, used for the purposes of an NT startup, Arlen. Unlike windows 9x family and the 3x family, NT doesn't ride on top of, or share code common natively with DOS. It's not a glorified 'shell'. Remember, pooh told you that net use only supported samba. YOU (yes, you) noticed net use (by trying it no doubt, you didn't know beforehand) noticed it worked with webdav too. I told you it has supported webdav since the Windows XP days and even went so far as to provide a demonstration of it that was touted as a new 'feature' of Windows XP. Viva la 'Web Folders'. Hehehe. Windows XP has been out for a long long time Arlen. There's no excuse for someone like pooh with the self proclaimed expertise (on multiple occasions mind you) to not have known that. None whatsoever. Pooh slipped up again (it's rare, but it happens) and showed his hand again. He's a considerable bullshitter, don't ya know. Ahem, well, you know that now... [g] Despite still praising him and intentionally not crediting me for my posts that you find are beneficial. I think that's pretty good, considering you've previously referred to me as a moron, stupid, etc. I'm stupid, yet I provided two posts (hehe, quite a bit more, but who's counting) that you yourself admit have technical value. Thanks, I guess? -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php =================================================== Man who run behind car get exhausted.
Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-14 17:24 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2018-10-17 01:06 +0100
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-18 16:26 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-18 18:13 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-18 19:59 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-18 20:42 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-18 21:55 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? M.L. <me@privacy.invalid> - 2018-10-19 23:04 -0500
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2018-10-20 00:37 -0400
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-21 19:20 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2018-10-21 16:42 -0400
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-21 22:47 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-22 13:51 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2018-10-22 16:44 +0200
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-22 17:21 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2018-10-22 21:43 +0200
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-22 20:44 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 12:10 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-23 16:16 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 19:21 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-23 20:51 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-23 16:54 -0400
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 22:23 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 22:23 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-10-23 23:09 +0200
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 22:23 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-10-24 02:47 +0200
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-24 10:35 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-10-24 17:25 +0200
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-24 15:50 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? M.L. <me@privacy.invalid> - 2018-10-25 17:49 -0500
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-26 01:24 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-27 07:32 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-22 20:37 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-23 15:58 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 19:46 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 19:52 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-22 22:55 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 00:37 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-10-23 12:55 +0200
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 12:10 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 14:11 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 22:36 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 19:15 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-22 21:44 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-22 21:07 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-11-02 19:05 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-03 02:00 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-11-03 15:09 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2018-10-22 18:56 +0100
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 03:37 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-21 01:30 +0000
csiph-web