Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #155345
| From | Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: Is ASUS the first casualty of the EU battery regs? |
| Date | 2026-08-27 10:22 +0200 |
| Organization | Camembert Normand au Lait Cru |
| Message-ID | <116os3m$16k7d$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <116ooip$18uei$1@dont-email.me> <116opb3$16i5a$1@solani.org> <tr75mmx3pu.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
On 27.08.26 10:07, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 2026-08-27 09:34, Jörg Lorenz wrote: >> On 27.08.26 09:22, Chris wrote: >>> >>> I am updating my EU battery review from earlier in the year, and I notice >>> that ASUS phones dropped out of the database in May or so. >>> >>> Checking the ASUS website today in a variety of EU countries I see that >>> their phones are either unavailable or quietly dropped. Is anyone local >>> seeing them in shops? >>> >>> I did note in March that their EU battery data was weird (together with >>> OnePlus); their rated battery capacity was less than half (2790 mAh) the >>> capacity of what was reported on their website (5800 mAh). Obviously, this >>> made the battery efficiency look very good compared to competitors. >>> https://rpubs.com/ithinkiam/1415197 >>> >>> Have ASUS decided to pull out of the EU? I can't see any official >>> announcement. And if they have, could it be because of the battery regs? >> >> That was already clear in January: >> >> https://www.nerdsheaven.de/asus-smartphones-2026/ >> >> I hope you understand German. > > Haven't you heard of automated translation? Works fine. You can do that yourself. I do not need it. -- "Roma locuta, causa finita" (Augustinus)
Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is ASUS the first casualty of the EU battery regs? Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-08-27 07:22 +0000
Re: Is ASUS the first casualty of the EU battery regs? Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2026-08-27 09:34 +0200
Re: Is ASUS the first casualty of the EU battery regs? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-27 10:07 +0200
Re: Is ASUS the first casualty of the EU battery regs? Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2026-08-27 10:22 +0200
Re: Is ASUS the first casualty of the EU battery regs? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-27 10:40 +0200
Re: Is ASUS the first casualty of the EU battery regs? Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-08-27 19:34 +0000
Re: Is ASUS the first casualty of the EU battery regs? Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2026-08-27 21:24 +0100
Re: Is ASUS the first casualty of the EU battery regs? Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2026-08-27 22:56 +0200
Re: Is ASUS the first casualty of the EU battery regs? Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2026-08-27 22:55 +0200
Re: Is ASUS the first casualty of the EU battery regs? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-08-27 18:47 +0200
Re: Is ASUS the first casualty of the EU battery regs? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-08-31 09:05 -0400
Re: Is ASUS the first casualty of the EU battery regs? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-09-02 17:45 +0200
Re: Is ASUS the first casualty of the EU battery regs? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-08-27 16:54 -0500
Re: Is ASUS the first casualty of the EU battery regs? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-27 23:59 +0100
csiph-web