Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.misc > #10228 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-01 17:00 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-02-01 19:25 +0100 |
| Articles | 6 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.misc
[CM] Oops: private browsing in Edge browser isn't actually private RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2016-02-01 17:00 +0000
Re: [CM] Oops: private browsing in Edge browser isn't actually private Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2016-02-01 10:00 -0800
Re: [CM] Oops: private browsing in Edge browser isn't actually private RS Wood <rswood@therandymon.com> - 2016-02-01 22:22 +0300
Re: [CM] Oops: private browsing in Edge browser isn't actually private Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-02-02 08:14 +0000
Re: [CM] Oops: private browsing in Edge browser isn't actually private Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2016-02-01 18:19 +0000
Re: [CM] Oops: private browsing in Edge browser isn't actually private "Andy K." <andy.k466@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 19:25 +0100
| From | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-01 17:00 +0000 |
| Subject | [CM] Oops: private browsing in Edge browser isn't actually private |
| Message-ID | <n8o2vh$r3p$1@solani.org> |
From the «private is what our lawyers say is private» department: Title: Microsoft Edge's Private Browsing Mode Isn't Actually Private Author: help@slashdot.org Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 18:59:00 -0500 Link: http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/Q4C2DwMmi34/microsoft-edges-private-browsing-mode-isnt-actually-private JustAnotherOldGuy writes: The forensic examination of most web browsers has proven that they don't have a provision for storing the details of privately browsed web sessions. However, in the case of Microsoft Edge, the private browsing isn't as private as it seems. Previous investigations of the browser have resulted in revealing that websites visited in private mode are also stored in the browser's WebCache file. The Container_n table stores web history, and a field named 'Flag' with a value of '8' shows that website was visited in private mode. An investigator can easily spot the difference and use this evidence against a person. The not-so-private browsing featured by Edge makes its very purpose seem to fail, and you can't help but ask how such a fundamental aspect of private browsing could be so fantastically borked. It beggars belief. [image 2][2][image 4][4][image 6][6] Read more of this story[7] at Slashdot. [image 8] Links: [1]: http://twitter.com/home?status=Microsoft+Edge's+Private+Browsing+Mode+Isn't+Actually+Private%3A+http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F20B3aZq (link) [2]: http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png (image) [3]: http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fyro.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F16%2F01%2F31%2F2359234%2Fmicrosoft-edges-private-browsing-mode-isnt-actually-private%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook (link) [4]: http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png (image) [5]: http://plus.google.com/share?url=http://yro.slashdot.org/story/16/01/31/2359234/microsoft-edges-private-browsing-mode-isnt-actually-private?utm_source=slashdot&utm_medium=googleplus (link) [6]: http://www.gstatic.com/images/icons/gplus-16.png (image) [7]: http://yro.slashdot.org/story/16/01/31/2359234/microsoft-edges-private-browsing-mode-isnt-actually-private?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&utm_medium=feed (link) [8]: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/Q4C2DwMmi34 (image) -- Posting to comp.misc, sci.misc, and misc.news.internet.discuss
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-01 10:00 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <uq6dnWrgEdVqATLLnZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #10228 |
On 02/01/16 09:00, RS Wood so wittily quipped: > From the «private is what our lawyers say is private» department: > Title: Microsoft Edge's Private Browsing Mode Isn't Actually Private > Author: help@slashdot.org > Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 18:59:00 -0500 > Link: http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/Q4C2DwMmi34/microsoft-edges-private-browsing-mode-isnt-actually-private > > JustAnotherOldGuy writes: The forensic examination of most web browsers has > proven that they don't have a provision for storing the details of privately > browsed web sessions. However, in the case of Microsoft Edge, the private > browsing isn't as private as it seems. Previous investigations of the browser > have resulted in revealing that websites visited in private mode are also > stored in the browser's WebCache file. The Container_n table stores web > history, and a field named 'Flag' with a value of '8' shows that website was > visited in private mode. An investigator can easily spot the difference and use > this evidence against a person. The not-so-private browsing featured by Edge > makes its very purpose seem to fail, and you can't help but ask how such a > fundamental aspect of private browsing could be so fantastically borked. It > beggars belief. links to here: http://betanews.com/2016/01/30/stop-using-microsoft-edges-inprivate-mode-if-you-value-your-privacy/ "Microsoft is aware of the problem, and says: 'We recently became aware of a report that claims InPrivate tabs are not working as designed, and we are committed to resolving this as quickly as possible.'" translation: you CAUGHT us with our pants down, and we're currently running around with our ASSES on fire (and our pants around our ankles).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RS Wood <rswood@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-01 22:22 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <dh9piqFqrr2U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #10231 |
Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> Wrote in message: > > translation: you CAUGHT us with our pants down, and we're currently > running around with our ASSES on fire (and our pants around our ankles). > > > Sure am glad I wasnt using that feature to visit sites i need to keep secret. Oh wait ....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-02 08:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA5A221E7889CBF7D9A8@dieselpower.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #10231 |
Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> news:uq6dnWrgEdVqATLLnZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@earthlink.com Mon, 01 Feb 2016 18:00:15 GMT in alt.hacker, wrote: > links to here: > > http://betanews.com/2016/01/30/stop-using-microsoft-edges-inprivate > -mode-if-you-value-your-privacy/ > > "Microsoft is aware of the problem, and says: 'We recently became > aware of a report that claims InPrivate tabs are not working as > designed, and we are committed to resolving this as quickly as > possible.'" > > translation: you CAUGHT us with our pants down, and we're > currently running around with our ASSES on fire (and our pants > around our ankles). ROFL. That's exactly what's happened. -- Hey listen... On your way back up, bring some popcorn...With salt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-01 18:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n8o7jo$iqc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #10228 |
In comp.misc RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote: > Title: Microsoft Edge's Private Browsing Mode Isn't Actually Private > ... > The not-so-private browsing featured by Edge makes its very purpose > seem to fail, and you can't help but ask how such a fundamental > aspect of private browsing could be so fantastically borked. It > beggars belief. Welcome to the world of Microsoft, building broken software for 30+ years, and continuing the tradition.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Andy K." <andy.k466@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-01 19:25 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n8o7pi$4ue$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #10232 |
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 18:19:36 -0000 (UTC) Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: > In comp.misc RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote: > > Title: Microsoft Edge's Private Browsing Mode Isn't Actually Private > > ... > > The not-so-private browsing featured by Edge makes its very purpose > > seem to fail, and you can't help but ask how such a fundamental > > aspect of private browsing could be so fantastically borked. It > > beggars belief. > > Welcome to the world of Microsoft, building broken software for 30+ > years, and continuing the tradition. Don't forget getting paid for it. Handsomely.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.misc
csiph-web